
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Back pain monitoring response to therapy
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Methods of determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (ODQ) contains 10 questions that have 5-point Likert scale answers and can measure the response to therapy.[1]
- The ODQ questions are worded to reduce recall bias[2].
- The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) has been proposed as >0.5 standard deviation improvement.[3]
- MCID of 12.8 has been proposed[4]
- Copay et al used various methods to determine the optimal MCID[4].
- Receiver-operating characteristic curve derived MCID: ” The optimal cut-off value for a ROC curve corresponds to the point of optimal trade-off between sensitivity and specificity “
- Half a standard deviation: Template:Sfrac \times {SD}
- Standard error of measurement SD \times \sqrt{1 – r}, “where SD is the standard deviation of the baseline scores and r is the test-retest reliability coefficient”
- Minimum detectable change: 1.96 \times \sqrt{2} \times{SEM}
- Effect size derived MCID: “multiplying the SD of the baseline scores by 0.2 (the small effect size)”
- Copay et al used various methods to determine the optimal MCID[4].
Recommendations for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
Copay calculated the MCID to be 12.8[4]. Davidson recommends an MCID of 10.5 or 15[5].
Fritz calculated a value for the MCID of 6.[6]
Vianin’s literature review finds the range of MCIDs proposed is 4 to 10.5.[7]
References
References
- ↑ Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980). “The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire”. Physiotherapy. 66 (8): 271–3. PMID 6450426.
- ↑ Tiao, Justin; Rosenberg, Ashley M.; Bienstock, Dennis M.; Sacks, Brittany; Laurore, Charles; Herrera, Michael; Shankar, Dhruv S.; Bronson, Wesley H.; Chaudhary, Saad B.; Poeran, Jashvant; Iatridis, James C.; Hecht, Andrew C. (2025-04-01). “The Oswestry Disability Index and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Scores Are Not Affected by Recall Bias in Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients: A Prospective Study Using Data From Fitness Trackers”. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global Research & Reviews. 9 (4): e24.00185. doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00185. ISSN 2474-7661. PMC 11981322 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 40215470 Check|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Delitto A, Piva SR, Moore CG, Fritz JM, Wisniewski SR, Josbeno DA; et al. (2015). “Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial”. Ann Intern Med. 162 (7): 465–73. doi:10.7326/M14-1420. PMC 6252248. PMID 25844995. Review in: Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;21(1):31
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008). “Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales”. Spine J. 8 (6): 968–74. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. PMID 18201937.
- ↑ Davidson M, Keating JL (2002). “A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness”. Phys Ther. 82 (1): 8–24. doi:10.1093/ptj/82.1.8. PMID 11784274.
- ↑ Fritz, J. M.; Irrgang, J. J. (2001). “A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale” (PDF). Physical Therapy. 81 (2): 776–788. doi:10.1093/ptj/81.2.776. ISSN 0031-9023. PMID 11175676. Retrieved 2025-08-19.
- ↑ Vianin M (2008). “Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index”. J Chiropr Med. 7 (4): 161–3. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.07.001. PMC 2697602. PMID 19646379.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Zehra Malik, M.B.B.S[2]
