Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Bone or cartilage mass imaging

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]

Overview

Overview

Conventional radiography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors. The evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors will depend on 7 characteristics: periosteal reaction, opacity and mineralization, location, size, margins, cortical involvement, and soft-tissue component.[1]

Imaging

Imaging

Plain Radiograph

Conventional radiography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors. The evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors will depend on 7 characteristics: location, margins, opacity and mineralization, size, periosteal reaction, cortical involvement, and soft-tissue component.[1]


 
 
 
 
 
Plain Radiograph
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What type of bone is involved?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long bone
 
 
 
Flat bone
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Where is the lesion located?
❑ Epiphysis
❑ Diaphysis
❑ Metaphysis
❑ Apophysis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the pattern involved?
❑ Osteoblastic
❑ Osteolytic
❑ Mixed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the transversal location?
❑ Medullary
❑ Cortical
❑ Juxtacortical
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What type of margin is involved?
❑ Well defined
❑ Ill-defined
❑ Sclerotic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Is there a periosteal reaction?
❑ Yes
❑ No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the size?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Likely benign?
 
 
 
Likely malignant?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Location

  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be divided by location into 3 different categories, such as:
  • Location in relation to the skeleton
  • Location in relation to the physis (long bones)
  • Location in relation to the transverse bone

Bone and cartilage tumors location by different parts of the skeleton, include:

  • Axial skeleton
  • Appendicular skeleton
  • Long bones
  • Flat bones

Bone and cartilage tumors location in relation to the physis, include:

Bone and cartilage tumors location in relation to the transverse bone, include:

  • Medullary
  • Cortical
  • Juxtacortical

Margin

The margin evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors, is divided into 3 categories:

  • Transition zone
  • Narrow
  • Wide
  • Margin characteristics
  • Well-defined
  • Ill-defined
  • Sclerotic
  • Patterns of bone destruction (appearance)
  • Moth-eaten (myeloma, metastases, Ewing’s sarcoma)
  • Geographic (non-ossifying fibroma, chondromyxoid fibroma, and eosinophilic granuloma)
  • Permeated (round cell lesions)

Opacity and mineralization

  • Bone and cartilage tumors opacity depends on the stimulation of osteoclasts or osteoblasts in the bone
  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be characterized by the tumor opacity into 3 different categories, including:
  • Lytic lesions
  • Sclerotic lesions
  • Mixed lesions
  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be characterized by 2 patterns of mineralization:
  • Osseous
  • Fluffy
  • Cloud-like
  • Chondral
  • Punctate
  • Flocculent
  • Arclike

Periosteal reaction

  • Periosteal reaction is a non-specific radiographic feature, that occurs with periosteal irritation
  • Periosteal reactions may be broadly characterized by pattern and tumor nature (benign/aggressive)
  • Useful to characterize a bone lesion
  • Common periosteal reactions, include:
  • Single layer
  • Multilayered (onion-skin)
  • Solid
  • Spiculated
  • Perpendicular (hair-on-end)
  • Divergent (sunburst)
  • Sloping (velvet)
  • Disorganised/complex
  • Codman triangle

Size

  • In some cases, bone tumor size may be helpful to establish the diagnosis (eg. osteoblastoma (>1.5 cm) vs osteoid osteoma (<1.5 cm))
  • Size can range from 0.1 cm – 10 cm
  • In general, large size tumors are more likely to be malignant, whereas small size tumors tend to be related with benign origin.

Cortical involvement

  • In some cases, bone and cartilage tumors lesions can specifically arise within the cortex, in such cases the evaluation will depend on:
  • Type of erosion
  • Endosteal scalloping
  • “Soap bubble” lesions

Soft-tissue component

  • Involvement of the soft-tissue is suggestive of a malignant process.

CT

  • Bone CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors
  • The majority of bone and cartilage tumors require further evaluation with CT scan
  • Features of bone CT scan, include:[2]
  • Characterization of sclerotic or mixed (lytic/sclerotic) lesions
  • Imaging method of choice for follow-up of malignant tumors
  • Characterization of occult bone destruction

MRI

  • Musculoskeletal MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors, common features include:[3]
  • Evaluation of the local extent of a malignant process
  • Useful for tumor staging
  • Evaluation of soft tissue extension
  • Extension within the bone marrow compartment and tumoral tissue infiltration
  • Soft-tissue edema
  • Narrow the differential diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors, especially when there are signs of aggressiveness
  • Contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal MRI can help demonstrate vascularized parts of the tumor
  • Useful evaluating lesions involving the cortical or medullary region, and determine whether they penetrate or invade the region
  • Useful to assess the response of chemotherapy in malignant bone tumors
  • The use of FS/STIR sequences may be helpful to confirm the presence or absence of fat in a lesion (useful to differentiate hemangioma from lipoma)
Gallery

Plain Radiograph

CT

MRI

References

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Miller TT (2008). “Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography”. Radiology. 246 (3): 662–74. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463061038. PMID 18223119.
  2. American College of Radiology (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Follow-up of Malignant or Aggressive Musculoskeletal Tumors. Available via http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/FollowupMalignantOrAggressiveMusculoskeletalTumors.pdf.
  3. Nascimento D, Suchard G, Hatem M, de Abreu A (2014). “The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tumours and tumour-like lesions”. Insights Imaging. 5 (4): 419–40. doi:10.1007/s13244-014-0339-z. PMC 4141345. PMID 25005774.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH