Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Carotid artery dissection

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Overview

Carotid artery dissection is a tear in the intima of the carotid artery wall causing separation of the wall layers. The carotid artery supplies blood to the head and brain. Carotid dissection is an important cause of stroke in young adults.

Pathophysiology

Pathophysiology

Arterial dissection of the carotid arteries occurs when a small tear in the innermost lining of the arterial wall forms. Blood can enter into the space between the inner and outer layers of the vessel, creating an intraluminal hematoma which forms a thrombus causing narrowing (stenosis) or complete occlusion. This thrombus can act as a nidus for distal embolization to the brain. Extracranial dissection of internal carotid artery is more frequent than intracranial dissection. The stenosis that occurs in the early stages of arterial dissection is a dynamic process and some occlusions can return to stenosis very quickly[1]. When complete occlusion occurs, it may lead to ischemia. Often, even a complete occlusion is totally asymptomatic because collateral circulation in the head keeps the brain well perfused. However, when blood clots form and break off from the site of the tear, the clots travel through the blood to the brain and clog one or more of the arteries directly supplying the brain, resulting in an ischemic stroke, otherwise known as an infarct. Blood clots, or emboli, originating from the dissection are thought to be the cause of infarction in the majority of cases of stroke in the presence of carotid artery dissection. Cerebral infarction causes irreversible damage to the brain. In one study of patients with carotid artery dissection, 60% had infarcts documented on neuroimaging[2][1] .

Causes

Causes

The cause of internal carotid artery dissection can be broadly categorized into two classes: spontaneous or traumatic.

Spontaneous

Once considered uncommon, spontaneous carotid artery dissection is an increasingly recognized cause of stroke that preferentially affects the middle-aged[3].

Observational studies and case reports published since the early 1980s show that patients with spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection may also have hereditary connective tissue disorders. These include:

Nevertheless, although an association exists with connective tissue disorders does exist, most people with spontaneous arterial dissections do not have associated connective tissue disorders.

Traumatic

Carotid artery dissection is more commonly thought to be caused by trauma to the head and/or neck. The probable mechanism of injury for most internal carotid injuries is rapid deceleration, with resultant hyperextension and rotation of the neck, which stretches the internal carotid artery over the upper cervical vertebrae, producing an intimal tear[4]. After such an injury, the patient may remain asymptomatic, have a hemispheric transient ischemic event, or suffer a stroke[5].

Differentiating Carotid Artery Dissection from other Diseases

Differentiating Carotid Artery Dissection from other Diseases

Carotid artery dissection should be differentiated form the following:

Epidemiology and Demographics

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • The annual incidence of spontaneous carotid artery dissection is low, and incidence rates for internal carotid artery dissection have been reported to be 2.6 to 2.9 per 100,000[6].
  • Prevalence of hereditary connective tissue diseases in people with spontaneous dissections is highly variable, ranging from 0% to 0.6% in one study to 5% to 18% in another study.
  • An estimated 0.67% of patients admitted to the hospital after motor vehicle accidents were found to have blunt carotid injury, including intimal dissections, pseudoaneurysms, thromboses, or fistulas[7]. Of these, 76% had intimal dissections, pseudoaneurysms, or a combination of the two.
  • Gender is not associated with an increased risk of carotid artery dissection.
Complications and Prognosis

Complications and Prognosis

Complication

Prognosis

Prognosis of carotid artery dissection is favorable with 75% of patients having a good recovery. Traumatic dissection is associated with a higher mortality rate on discharge compared to spontaneous dissection. Two important prognostic factors include:

  • Initial ischemic injury
  • Collateral circulation
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Symptoms

Common symptoms of carotid artery dissection include:

Physical Examination

Eyes

Laboratory Findings

  • Complete blood count
  • Coagulation studies
    • Prothrombin time (PT)
    • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)

Imaging

Helical CT angiography (CTA)

Helical CT angiography is a reliable method to diagnose carotid artery dissections. Findings on a helical CT angiography include:

  • Narrowed eccentric lumen
  • Arterial wall thickening
  • Thin annular contrast enhancement
  • Enlargement of the dissected artery

Also, the finding of a fractured cervical bone should raise the suspicion for carotid artery dissection.

Advantages include:

  • Fast
  • Noninvasive

Magnetic Resonance Angiography

MRA has evolved as an excellent imaging modality to screen and diagnose carotid artery dissection and is superior to the conventional angiography. The classic findings on an MRA include:

  • Intraluminal hematoma which appears hyperintense on fat-suppressed, axial T1 and T2 weighted images
  • Mural expansion

Other findings include:

  • Irregular vessel margins
  • Filling defects
  • Vascular occlusion
  • Caliber changes of the vessel

Advantages of MRA:

Disadvantages include:

  • Failure to detect the intramural hematoma with in the first 24-48 hours after carotid artery dissection

Doppler Ultrasonography

Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) is used as an initial assessment of carotid artery dissection. Findings inlude:

  • Appearance of a membrane, which is appreciated in both longitudinal and axial views
  • Visualization of a false lumen even when it is thrombosed
Treatment

Treatment

The goal of treatment is to prevent the development or continuation of neurologic deficits. Treatments include

2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS: Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS: Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

Management of Patients with Cervical Artery Dissection (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

Class I
1. Contrast-enhanced CTA, MRA, and catheter-based contrast angiography are useful for diagnosis of cervical artery dissection. (Level of Evidence: C)
Class IIa
1. Antithrombotic treatment with either an anticoagulant (heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or warfarin) or a platelet inhibitor (aspirin, clopidogrel, or the combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin) for at least 3 to 6 months is reasonable for patients with extracranial carotid or vertebral arterial dissection associated with ischemic stroke or TIA[9][10][11][12]. (Level of Evidence: B)
Class IIb
1. Carotid angioplasty and stenting might be considered when ischemic neurological symptoms have not responded to antithrombotic therapy after acute carotid dissection. (Level of Evidence: C)
2. The safety and effectiveness of pharmacological therapy with a beta-adrenergic antagonist, angiotensin inhibitor, or nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist (verapamil or diltiazem) to lower blood pressure to the normal range and reduce arterial wall stress are not well established. (Level of Evidence: C)
Related Chapters
References

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lucas, C; Moulin, T; Deplanque, D; Tatu, L; Chavot, D (1998). “Stroke patterns of internal carotid artery dissection in 40 patients”. Stroke. 29 (12): 2646–2648. doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.12.2646. PMID 9836779. Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  2. VH Lee, et al. Incidence and outcome of cervical dissection; a population-based study. Neurology 2006;67:1809-1812.
  3. In: Neurology 2006;67:1809-1812. Mokri B. Spontaneous dissections of internal carotid arteries. Neurologist 1997;3:104–119.
  4. TC Fabian, et al. Blunt Carotid Injury. Annals of Surgery. 1996; Vol. 223, No. 5: 513-52.
  5. JH Matsuura, et al. Traumatic Carotid Artery Dissection and Pseudoaneurysm Treated With Endovascular Coils and Stent Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 1997; Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 339–343.
  6. VH Lee, et al. Incidence and outcome of cervical dissection; a population-based study. Neurology 2006;67:1809-1812.
  7. TC Fabian, et al. Blunt Carotid Injury. Annals of Surgery. 1996; Vol. 223, No. 5: 513-52.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL; et al. (2011). “2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery”. Circulation. 124 (4): 489–532. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78. PMID 21282505.
  9. Metso TM, Metso AJ, Helenius J; et al. (2007). “Prognosis and safety of anticoagulation in intracranial artery dissections in adults”. Stroke. 38 (6): 1837–42. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479501. PMID 17495218. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S; et al. (2007). “Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection”. Stroke. 38 (9): 2605–11. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489666. PMID 17656656. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Menon R, Kerry S, Norris JW, Markus HS (2008). “Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 79 (10): 1122–7. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.138800. PMID 18303104. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Georgiadis D, Arnold M, von Buedingen HC; et al. (2009). “Aspirin vs anticoagulation in carotid artery dissection: a study of 298 patients”. Neurology. 72 (21): 1810–5. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a2a50a. PMID 19321846. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH