
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions โ written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Celiac disease classification
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Celiac disease (CD) may be classified according to the symptoms and laboratory findings into 5 sub groups as, classical, atypical, asymptomatic, latent, and potential CD.
Classification
Classification
Celiac disease (CD) may be classified according to burden of symptoms into five sub groups:[1][2][3][4][5][6]
- Classical CD
- Atypical CD
- Asymptomatic CD
- Latent CD
- Potential CD
| Type | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Classical | Classic CD has typical features of gastrointestinal upset (eg, chronic diarrhea) in addition to extraintestinal symptoms and signs (eg, anaemia, neuropathy, decreased bone density, increased risk of fractures) |
| Atypical | Atypical CD presents with minor gastrointestinal symptoms and signs and is rarely associated with anemia, dental enamel defects, osteoporosis, arthritis, increased transaminases, neurological symptoms, or infertility. |
| Asymptomatic | Silent CD is defined as the presence of positive CD-specific antibodies, HLA, and small-bowel biopsy findings that are compatible with CD but without sufficient symptoms and signs to warrant clinical suspicion of CD. |
| Latent | Latent CD is defined by the presence of compatible HLA but without enteropathy in a patient who has had a gluten-dependent enteropathy at some point in his or her life. The patient may or may not have symptoms and may or may not have CD-specific antibodies. |
| Potential CD | Potential CD is defined by the presence of CD-specific antibodies and compatible HLA but without histological abnormalities on duodenal biopsies. The patient may or may not have symptoms and signs and may or may not develop a gluten dependency enteropathy later. |
References
References
- โ RUBIN CE, BRANDBORG LL, PHELPS PC, TAYLOR HC (1960). “Studies of celiac disease. I. The apparent identical and specific nature of the duodenal and proximal jejunal lesion in celiac disease and idiopathic sprue”. Gastroenterology. 38: 28โ49. PMIDย 14439871.
- โ Zanini B, Caselani F, Magni A, Turini D, Ferraresi A, Lanzarotto F, Villanacci V, Carabellese N, Ricci C, Lanzini A (2013). “Celiac disease with mild enteropathy is not mild disease”. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 (3): 253โ8. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.027. PMIDย 23022697.
- โ Marsh MN (1992). “Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’)”. Gastroenterology. 102 (1): 330โ54. PMIDย 1727768.
- โ Troncone R, Greco L, Mayer M, Paparo F, Caputo N, Micillo M, Mugione P, Auricchio S (1996). “Latent and potential coeliac disease”. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 412: 10โ4. PMIDย 8783748.
- โ Matysiak-Budnik T, Malamut G, de Serre NP, Grosdidier E, Seguier S, Brousse N, Caillat-Zucman S, Cerf-Bensussan N, Schmitz J, Cellier C (2007). “Long-term follow-up of 61 coeliac patients diagnosed in childhood: evolution toward latency is possible on a normal diet”. Gut. 56 (10): 1379โ86. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.100511. PMCย 2000276. PMIDย 17303598.
- โ Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabรณ IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R, Troncone R, Giersiepen K, Branski D, Catassi C, Lelgeman M, Mรคki M, Ribes-Koninckx C, Ventura A, Zimmer KP (2012). “European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease”. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 54 (1): 136โ60. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0. PMIDย 22197856.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Seyedmahdi Pahlavani, M.D. [2]
