Developer site: The content shown here is test data.

Health Dictionary AI Health Chat Find an Online Doctor
A serene Zen garden with raked sand and smooth stones, symbolising clarity and calm

Health Dictionary

Back to skin conditions

Chagas disease laboratory findings

Introduction

Overview

Overview

Acute Chagas disease is often diagnosed by peripheral blood smear following the visual detection of T. cruzi parasite. Serology is often helpful for chronic cases only, where assay positivity of both “whole parasite lysate” and “recombinant antigen” is usually required for the diagnosis. Although PCR is sensitive in acute cases (e.g. exposure following organ transplantation), its sensitivity and specificity are variable in the chronic state and highly depend on the pre-test probability.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory Findings

Blood smear

  • Acute Chagas disease is often diagnosed by visual detection of the T. cruzi parasite on peripheral blood smear.
  • Peripheral blood smears are usually stained with Giemsa stain for adequate visualization of the parasite.

Serology

  • Serology is not usually helpful in acute Chagas disease.
  • Detection of anti-trypanosomal IgG antibodies is helpful to detect chronic Chagas disease infections.[1][2]
  • A single assay for chronic T. cruzi infection is neither sensitive nor specific, and positive results from both “whole parasite lysate” and “recombinant antigens” are required to make the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease.[1][2]
  • Detection of antibodies among infants may be difficult due to the presence of maternal antibodies early following birth. Accordingly, serologic testing for infants is only recommended at least 9 months after birth.[3]

PCR

  • In acute disease, PCR is very sensitive and is widely used today to detect accidental exposure among organ transplant recipients following organ transplantation
  • In chronic disease, PCR sensitivity and specificity depend on the pre-test probability of Chagas disease.[4]
  • Serial PCR measurements are often necessary to confirm the diagnosis of Chagas disease.[4]
  • Quantitative PCR is helpful to monitor for Chagas reactivation, and increasing parasitic load on PCR is considered a sensitive surrogate of reactivation.[5]
References

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Rassi A, Rassi A, Marcondes de Rezende J (2012). “American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease)”. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 26 (2): 275–91. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2012.03.002. PMIDΒ 22632639.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Tarleton RL, Reithinger R, Urbina JA, Kitron U, GΓΌrtler RE (2007). “The challenges of Chagas Disease– grim outlook or glimmer of hope”. PLoS Med. 4 (12): e332. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040332. PMCΒ 2222930. PMIDΒ 18162039.
  3. ↑ Bern C, Martin DL, Gilman RH (2011). “Acute and congenital Chagas disease”. Adv Parasitol. 75: 19–47. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385863-4.00002-2. PMIDΒ 21820550.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Schijman AG, Bisio M, Orellana L, Sued M, Duffy T, Mejia Jaramillo AM; et al. (2011). “International study to evaluate PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from Chagas disease patients”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 5 (1): e931. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000931. PMCΒ 3019106. PMIDΒ 21264349.
  5. ↑ Duffy T, Bisio M, Altcheh J, Burgos JM, Diez M, Levin MJ; et al. (2009). “Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in chagas disease patients”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 3 (4): e419. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000419. PMCΒ 2667272. PMIDΒ 19381287.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 “Public Health Image Library (PHIL)”.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.