
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions β written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Chondroma x ray
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Findings on an x-ray suggestive of chondroma include well-defined or sclerotic border, sharp zone of transition, confinement by natural barriers, lack of destruction of the cortex and lack of extension into the soft tissue.
X Ray Findings
X Ray Findings
- X-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of chondroma. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of chondroma include:[1][2][3][4][5][6]
![]() |
- Well-defined or sclerotic border
- Sharp zone of transition
- Small size or multiple lesions
- Confinement by natural barriers
- Lack of destruction of the cortex
- Lack of extension into the soft tissue
- Following x-ray findings are suggestive of more aggresive lesion:
- Poor definition
- Cortical destruction (“moth-eaten” or permeative pattern)
- Spiculated or interrupted periosteal reaction
- Extension into the soft tissue
- Large size
Enchondroma
- Oval, well-circumscribed, central lucent lesion, with or without matrix calcifications
- May be expansion of the surrounding cortex, especially when the lesion is in the hand or foot
Periosteal chondroma
- Small, scalloped, radiolucent lesions on the outer surface of the cortex in the metaphysis or diaphysis
- Rim of sclerotic bone
- Calcification
References
References
- β Pannier S, Legeai-Mallet L (March 2008). “Hereditary multiple exostoses and enchondromatosis”. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 22 (1): 45β54. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.004. PMIDΒ 18328980.
- β Silve C, JΓΌppner H (September 2006). “Ollier disease”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 1: 37. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-37. PMCΒ 1592482. PMIDΒ 16995932.
- β Gajewski DA, Burnette JB, Murphey MD, Temple HT (April 2006). “Differentiating clinical and radiographic features of enchondroma and secondary chondrosarcoma in the foot”. Foot Ankle Int. 27 (4): 240β4. doi:10.1177/107110070602700403. PMIDΒ 16624212.
- β Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC (October 1997). “Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 169 (4): 1097β104. doi:10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308471. PMIDΒ 9308471.
- β Weiner SD (2004). “Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of bone: clinical, radiologic, and histologic differentiation”. Instr Course Lect. 53: 645β9. PMIDΒ 15116654.
- β Miller SF (January 2014). “Imaging features of juxtacortical chondroma in children”. Pediatr Radiol. 44 (1): 56β63. doi:10.1007/s00247-013-2770-6. PMIDΒ 23955368.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2], Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]

