
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Hemorrhoids natural history, complications and prognosis
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Most symptomatic hemorrhoids follow a relapsing–remitting course with an excellent overall prognosis, and only about 10% of patients ultimately require surgery.[1] Asymptomatic or incidentally detected hemorrhoids need no treatment.[1][2] The main complications of the disease are thrombosis of external hemorrhoids, strangulation of irreducible (grade IV) prolapse with risk of gangrene and perineal sepsis, iron-deficiency anemia from chronic bleeding, and pruritus ani with soiling.[3][4] Treatment-related complications include pain and delayed bleeding after rubber band ligation, and urinary retention, fecal incontinence, and anal stricture after hemorrhoidectomy. Perineal sepsis after office procedures is rare but can be fatal.[5] Recurrence rises as treatment becomes less invasive. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy has the lowest recurrence (2%–10%), and its advantage over rubber band ligation is concentrated in grade III disease.[1][6][7] Rectal bleeding or anemia should never be attributed to hemorrhoids until colorectal cancer and other sources have been excluded.[4]
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Natural History
- Asymptomatic disease: Hemorrhoidal tissue is common and often silent. In an Austrian screening colonoscopy cohort, 38.9% of patients had internal hemorrhoidal tissue, and 55.3% of these were asymptomatic. Asymptomatic hemorrhoids require no intervention and carry an excellent prognosis.[1][2]
- Symptomatic internal disease: Usually presents with painless bleeding and/or prolapse and follows a relapsing–remitting course that responds to conservative and office-based measures.[1] Prolapse grade (I, within the canal; II, spontaneous reduction; III, manual reduction; IV, irreducible) broadly predicts the intensity of treatment required and the risk of recurrence.[1]
- Thrombosed external hemorrhoids: Most resolve with conservative management over days to weeks, often leaving a residual skin tag. After about 72 hours the thrombus organizes and the overlying hematoma liquefies. Excision within 48–72 hours shortens symptomatic pain and reduces recurrence compared with conservative care.[3][2]
- Progression to strangulation: Irreducible (grade IV) prolapse can be trapped by anal sphincter spasm, causing venous congestion and strangulation. If untreated, this can progress to necrosis and life-threatening perineal sepsis. It is uncommon, but it is the main reason untreated advanced disease is dangerous.[4][3]
Complications
Complications of hemorrhoidal disease
- Thrombosis: Acute, sharply painful, bluish-purple perianal mass (external hemorrhoids). Erosion of the thrombus may cause bright-red bleeding.[1]
- Strangulation and necrosis/gangrene: Results from irreducible prolapse with vascular compromise and may progress to life-threatening infection. Management is almost always inpatient and ranges from analgesia and antibiotics to emergency excision.[3]
- Iron-deficiency anemia: Results from chronic bleeding. Rarely, acute severe bleeding requires transfusion. Anemia mandates full colonic evaluation and should never be attributed to hemorrhoids alone.[4]
- Pruritus ani, mucous discharge, and fecal seepage/soiling: Caused by prolapse and by skin tags that impede anal hygiene.[3]
- Residual skin tags: Common after a thrombosed external hemorrhoid resolves. They are a cosmetic and hygienic problem, not a dangerous one.[1]
- Infection: Significant infection or abscess is not a routine complication of uncomplicated hemorrhoids. It is essentially confined to strangulation/necrosis and to rare post-procedural perineal sepsis.[2][3]
Complications of treatment
| Intervention | Principal complications |
|---|---|
| Rubber band ligation | Anorectal pain, bleeding, external hemorrhoid thrombosis, vasovagal symptoms. Rare perineal/perianal sepsis presents with fever, severe anal pain, difficulty with micturition, or incontinence and requires urgent broad-spectrum antibiotics and examination under anesthesia.[2][5] |
| Rubber band ligation in patients on antithrombotic therapy | Increased bleeding risk. Sclerotherapy is a safer alternative in anticoagulated patients.[5][2] |
| Excisional hemorrhoidectomy | Postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, fecal incontinence, anal stricture. Incontinence may be transient, from edema impairing sphincter approximation, or persistent, from sphincter injury (especially with pre-existing incontinence).[1][5] |
| Stapled hemorrhoidopexy | Distinctive serious complications: rectovaginal fistula, chronic pain, rectal perforation, anorectal stricture.[8][9] |
Prognosis
- The overall prognosis is excellent, and most patients never require surgery (~10% do).[1]
- Recurrence is the main prognostic trade-off: it rises as treatment becomes less invasive. In a 1,958-patient cohort (mean follow-up 42 months), treatment received was the main independent predictor of recurrence. Rubber band ligation had the highest recurrence and the lowest complication rate, and excisional hemorrhoidectomy had the lowest recurrence.[7]
Outcomes and recurrence by treatment modality
| Modality | Symptom resolution / efficacy | Recurrence or re-treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative (fiber, fluid) | Persistent symptoms reduced by ~53% versus usual care[1] | Relapsing course; may be definitive for mild disease |
| Phlebotonics/flavonoids | Improve bleeding, pruritus, and discharge, but not pain[3][1] | ~80% symptom recurrence within 3–6 months of stopping[3] |
| Rubber band ligation | ~89% symptom resolution; 86.7% asymptomatic at 8 weeks[1] | Up to 20% need repeat banding; ~15.5% symptomatic recurrence at 2 years. Recurrence was 47.5% in grade III disease in an RCT.[1][6] |
| Sclerotherapy | 70%–90% short-term[1] | Long-term remission in about one-third[1] |
| Infrared coagulation | 70%–80%[1] | Similar to rubber band ligation |
| Transanal (Doppler-guided) hemorrhoidal dearterialization | Less postoperative pain than excision[1] | Higher recurrence than excisional hemorrhoidectomy[1] |
| Excisional hemorrhoidectomy | Highest efficacy; 89.3% complete remission versus 50% with rubber band ligation[1] | Low: 2%–10% overall; 6.1% in the grade III RCT. Recovery takes 9–14 days.[1][6] |
| Stapled hemorrhoidopexy | Effective short-term | Higher long-term recurrence than excisional surgery[10]. One large single-surgeon cohort found recurrence similar to excision but the highest complication rate.[7] |
Grade-dependence of the banding-versus-excision gap
- In a Cochrane analysis, excision was superior to rubber band ligation for grade III disease (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.04–1.45) but not for grade II disease (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.94–1.21).[1]
- In the Dutch multicenter HollAND RCT in grade III disease (n = 87), recurrence was 47.5% after rubber band ligation versus 6.1% after hemorrhoidectomy (absolute difference 41%; 95% CI 24%–59%). Banding was not noninferior in quality-adjusted life years, but patients had less pain and returned to work sooner (1 vs 9 days).[6]
- Grade III disease is therefore a genuine decision point rather than an automatic surgical referral. Patients choosing banding should be counseled on the quantified recurrence penalty.[6][5]
Areas of Uncertainty
- Optimal first-line treatment for grade III disease: Society guidance allows both office-based rubber band ligation and excision. The pivotal RCT was small and terminated early (n = 87).[6][5]
- Bleeding risk with antithrombotic therapy: Systematic reviews suggest increased post-banding bleeding, but a retrospective clopidogrel cohort found no significant difference. The optimal timing for holding and resuming agents is unresolved.[5]
- Conservative adjuncts: Efficacy of sitz baths, suppositories, and topical anesthetics/steroids rests on scarce evidence despite widespread use.[3]
- Newer sclerosants: Polidocanol foam may rival rubber band ligation with lower recurrence and fewer complications, based on small trials that need confirmation.[11]
Clinical Pearls
- Significant pain with internal hemorrhoids suggests strangulation or a thrombosed external component. Otherwise, suspect an alternative diagnosis such as anal fissure.[3]
- Strangulated hemorrhoids lack concentric mucosal folds and cannot be reduced, which distinguishes them from full-thickness rectal prolapse.[4]
- The characteristic delayed-hemorrhage windows are 10–14 days after rubber band ligation and 7–10 days after hemorrhoidectomy.[5][1]
- Fever, severe anal pain, and urinary difficulty after banding suggest perineal sepsis and require urgent examination under anesthesia and antibiotics.[5]
- Limiting perioperative intravenous fluids to less than 750 mL and providing adequate analgesia reduces urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy.[5]
References
References
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 Ashburn JH (2025). “Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Review”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13083.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Wald A, Bharucha AE, Limketkai B, Malcolm A, Remes-Troche JM, Whitehead WE, Zutshi M (2021). “ACG Clinical Guidelines: Management of Benign Anorectal Disorders”. Am J Gastroenterol. 116 (10): 1987–2008. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001507. PMID 34618700 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 Bharucha AE, Knowles CH, Malcolm A (2026). “An Evidence-Based Practical Review on Common Benign Anorectal Disorders: Hemorrhoids, Anal Fissure, Dyssynergic Defecation, and Fecal Incontinence”. Gastroenterology.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Bharucha AE, Cima RR (2022). “Anorectal diseases”. Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology (7th ed.).
- ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 Hawkins AT, Davis BR, Bhama AR, Fang SH, Dawes AJ, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM (2024). “The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids”. Dis Colon Rectum. 67 (5): 614–623. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000003276. PMID 38294832 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 van Oostendorp JY, Dekker L, van Dieren S, Veldkamp R, Bemelman WA, Han-Geurts I (2025). “Comparison of Rubber Band Ligation and Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Grade III: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial”. Dis Colon Rectum. 68 (5): 572–583. PMC PMC11999089 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 39952268 Check|pmid=value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help) - ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 De Robles MS, Young CJ (2021). “Surgical technique is the main predictor of recurrence in the management of haemorrhoids”. ANZ J Surg. 91 (9): 1854–1858. doi:10.1111/ans.16738. PMID 33724701 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Muldoon R (2020). “Review of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids”. JAMA Surg. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0788.
- ↑ Wang TH, Kiu KT, Yen MH, Chang TC (2020). “Comparison of the short-term outcomes of using DST and PPH staplers in the treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids”. Sci Rep. 10 (1): 5189. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62141-5. PMC PMC7089945 Check
|pmc=value (help). - ↑ Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2007). “Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery”. Dis Colon Rectum. 50 (9): 1297–305. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-0308-4. PMID 17665254.
- ↑ Arnold MJ, Smith D (2025). “Management of Hemorrhoids: Guidelines From the ASCRS”. Am Fam Physician.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] {Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [3]
