
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Insulinoma ultrasound
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Transabdominal ultrasound has low sensitivity varying between 0 to 66% in detecting insulinoma. The sensitivity increases with the use of more invasive technique including endoscopic ultrasound (93%) and intra-operative ultrasound (86%). Hypo-echoic lesions and hypervascular mass are seen on the ultrasound.
Transabdominal Ultrasound
Transabdominal Ultrasound
- Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of insulinoma. The sensitivity varies from 0 to 66%. Smaller tumors are difficult to detect especially those on the tail of the pancreas. Findings on a trans-abdominal ultrasound suggestive of insulinoma include:[1]
- Low echogenicity
- Hypervascularity on the doppler
- An ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of complications of malignant insulinoma, which include:
Invasive Ultrasound
Invasive Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound
This is an invasive ultrasound which can be done pre-operatively. The use has been increased with the increase in sensitivities from 40 to 93%, more accurate in diagnosing pancreatic head insulinomas. It is supported as the primary diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (which includes insulinoma). The advantages include:[1][2][3]
- Visualization of smaller tumors (2mm)
- Detection of invasion and local metastasis
- Higher spatial resolutions
The disadvantages are:
- Invasiveness
- High cost
- Availabilty and expertise
{{#ev:youtube|TF1phjhRZLg}}
Intra-operative Ultrasound
The use was introduced in 1981 and used to localize non-palpable lesions and tumors which are in close proximity to pancreatic and bile ducts. They can localize the tumors in 86% of cases when performed during an open or laparoscopic surgery. [4][5]
References
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 McAuley, G.; Delaney, H.; Colville, J.; Lyburn, I.; Worsley, D.; Govender, P.; Torreggiani, W.C. (2005). “Multimodality preoperative imaging of pancreatic insulinomas”. Clinical Radiology. 60 (10): 1039–1050. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.005. ISSN 0009-9260.
- ↑ Sotoudehmanesh R, Hedayat A, Shirazian N, Shahraeeni S, Ainechi S, Zeinali F; et al. (2007). “Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the localization of insulinoma”. Endocrine. 31 (3): 238–41. PMID 17906369.
- ↑ Anderson MA, Carpenter S, Thompson NW, Nostrant TT, Elta GH, Scheiman JM (2000). “Endoscopic ultrasound is highly accurate and directs management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas”. Am J Gastroenterol. 95 (9): 2271–7. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02480.x. PMID 11007228.
- ↑ Brown CK, Bartlett DL, Doppman JL, Gorden P, Libutti SK, Fraker DL; et al. (1997). “Intraarterial calcium stimulation and intraoperative ultrasonography in the localization and resection of insulinomas”. Surgery. 122 (6): 1189–93, discussion 1193-4. PMID 9426437.
- ↑ Grover AC, Skarulis M, Alexander HR, Pingpank JF, Javor ED, Chang R; et al. (2005). “A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic exploration with intraoperative ultrasound as a technique for localizing sporadic insulinomas”. Surgery. 138 (6): 1003–8, discussion 1008. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.017. PMID 16360384.
​​
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Amandeep Singh M.D.[2]
