
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
No-reflow phenomenon pathophysiology
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology
Distal Embolization of Plaques and/or Thrombus
The primary mechanism of no-reflow is likely due to distal embolization of atheromatous and thrombotic debris dislodged by balloon inflation or stent implantation.[1][2] During PCI, microthrombi and small particles of plaques are thought to be showered downstream, occluding small arteries, arterioles, and collateral microvasculature. Analysis of the aspirate obtained from patients without no-reflow revealed a greater amount of atheromatous plaques and significantly more platelet and fibrin complex, macrophages, and cholesterolcrystals than those who experienced no-reflow. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher (27.5%) in patients with no-reflow phenomenon than in patients with normal coronary blood flow after PCI (5.3%, P < 0.001). Predictors of no-reflow include a higher plaque burden, thrombus, lipid pools by IVUS, higher lesion elastic membrane cross-sectional area, pre-infarction angina, and TIMI flow grade 0 on the initial coronary angiogram, among other factors.
Other pathophysiologic mechanisms include:
- Release of active tissue factor from the dislodged plaque[3]
- Vasoconstriction secondary to serotonin, adenosine diphosphate, thromboxane A2, released by the embolized platelet-rich atheromatous material[4]
- Reperfusion injury from the release of oxygen free radicals during inflammation
- Myocardial necrosis and stunning
- Microvascular damage[5]
- Microvascular plugging with platelets or leukocytes
- Endothelial swelling and tissue edema compressing vasculature
References
References
- ↑ Henriques, JP.; Zijlstra, F.; Ottervanger, JP.; de Boer, MJ.; van ‘t Hof, AW.; Hoorntje, JC.; Suryapranata, H. (2002). “Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction”. Eur Heart J. 23 (14): 1112–7. doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.3035. PMID 12090749. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Kawaguchi, R.; Oshima, S.; Jingu, M.; Tsurugaya, H.; Toyama, T.; Hoshizaki, H.; Taniguchi, K. (2007). “Usefulness of virtual histology intravascular ultrasound to predict distal embolization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 50 (17): 1641–6. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.051. PMID 17950144. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Bonderman, D.; Teml, A.; Jakowitsch, J.; Adlbrecht, C.; Gyöngyösi, M.; Sperker, W.; Lass, H.; Mosgoeller, W.; Glogar, DH. (2002). “Coronary no-reflow is caused by shedding of active tissue factor from dissected atherosclerotic plaque”. Blood. 99 (8): 2794–800. PMID 11929768. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Gregorini, L.; Marco, J.; Kozà kovà , M.; Palombo, C.; Anguissola, GB.; Marco, I.; Bernies, M.; Cassagneau, B.; Distante, A. (1999). “Alpha-adrenergic blockade improves recovery of myocardial perfusion and function after coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction”. Circulation. 99 (4): 482–90. PMID 9927393. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Kloner, RA.; Rude, RE.; Carlson, N.; Maroko, PR.; DeBoer, LW.; Braunwald, E. (1980). “Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion: which comes first?”. Circulation. 62 (5): 945–52. PMID 7418179. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Jennifer Giuseffi, M.D.; David M. Leder, M.D.; Ayokunle Olubaniyi, M.B,B.S [2]
