
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings
Introduction
Overview
Overview
There are no other imaging findings associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by elastography
Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by elastography
Vibration-controlled transient elastography is used to noninvasively measure liver stiffness and is commonly used after FIB-4 testing in patients at increased risk for advanced fibrosis. A liver stiffness measurement greater than 8.0 kPa should prompt referral to a hepatologist for further evaluation.
Two-dimensional shear wave elastography [SWE]) can estimate liver stiffness measurements: “LS of 8 and 12.5 kPa represent generally accepted cut-off values for F3 and F4 fibrosis. LS highly correlates with portal pressure, and esophageal varices are likely at values >20 kPa.”[1]
- LS of 8 suggests F3 fibrosis
- LS of 12.5 kPa suggests F4 fibrosis
A more recent study suggests lower cutoffs[2]:
- LS of 6 suggests F2 fibrosis
- LS of 7 suggests F3 fibrosis
- LS of 11 kPa suggests F4 fibrosis
The FibroScan can measure LSM by SWE
Magnetic resonance elastography
Magnetic resonance elastography
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) may be more accurate than elastography[3]
Hepatic steatosis
Hepatic steatosis
Hepattic steatosis can be measured with the Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).[4][2][5]
The controlled attenuation parameter measures attenuation of ultrasound waves through the liver and is usually performed with vibration-controlled transient elastography. A controlled attenuation parameter value of 248 dB/m or greater is considered diagnostic for hepatic steatosis, and higher values indicate more severe steatosis.
Compared with conventional ultrasonography, controlled attenuation parameter has similar sensitivity and slightly higher specificity, approximately 90%, for detecting hepatic steatosis.
Other imaging
Other imaging
CT scan: “≤ 40 Hounsfield units indicating > 30% hepatic steatosis”[6].
References
References
- ↑ Mueller S, Sandrin L (2010). “Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease”. Hepat Med. 2: 49–67. doi:10.2147/hmer.s7394. PMC 3846375. PMID 24367208.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Eddowes PJ, Sasso M, Allison M, Tsochatzis E, Anstee QM, Sheridan D; et al. (2019). “Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Gastroenterology. 156 (6): 1717–1730. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042. PMID 30689971.
- ↑ Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, Miller FH, Motosugi U, Low RN; et al. (2015). “Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13 (3): 440–451.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.046. PMC 4333001. PMID 25305349.
- ↑ Petroff D, Blank V, Newsome PN, Voican CS, Thiele M; et al. (2021). “Assessment of hepatic steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter using the M and XL probes: an individual patient data meta-analysis”. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6 (3): 185–198. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30357-5. PMID 33460567 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedpmid33501527
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS
