
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Occupational lung disease diagnostic study of choice
Introduction
Overview
Overview
The initial study of choice for the diagnosis of occupational lung disease is a chest x-ray. The findings on x ray that are suggestive of occupational lung disease include, pleural thickening, plaques, calcifications, opacities, and atelectasis.
Diagnostic Study of Choice
Diagnostic Study of Choice
Study of choice:
- Chest x-ray is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of occupational lung disease.[1][2][3][4]
- The following result of chest x-ray is confirmatory of occupational lung disease:
- Pleural thickening
- Pleural plaques
- Pleural abnormalities
- Calcification
- Small or large opacities
- Costophrenic angle obliteration
- Atelectasis
- Pneumothorax
- Parenchymal bands
- Enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes
- Bullae
- Granulomata
The comparison table for diagnostic studies of choice for occupational lung disease
| Test | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|
| Chest x-ray | 47% | 82% |
Sequence of Diagnostic Studies
- The chest x – ray should be performed when:
Diagnostic criteria
- Occupational lung disease may be diagnosed at any time if one or more of the following criteria are met:
- Recorded exposure to an inhalant known to induce disease
- A clearly established latency period between exposure to the noxious agent and the development of symptoms of disease
- Clinical symptoms that are compatible with the clear features of the disease
- Exclusion of other diseases that could possibly be responsible for the clinical picture
References
References
- ↑ Kim JS, Lynch DA (2002). “Imaging of nonmalignant occupational lung disease”. J Thorac Imaging. 17 (4): 238–60. PMID 12362064.
- ↑ Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, Han J, Kwon OJ, Kim TS (2006). “Pneumoconiosis: comparison of imaging and pathologic findings”. Radiographics. 26 (1): 59–77. doi:10.1148/rg.261055070. PMID 16418244.
- ↑ Hering KG, Jacobsen M, Bosch-Galetke E, Elliehausen HJ, Hieckel HG, Hofmann-Preiss K, Jacques W, Jeremie U, Kotschy-Lang N, Kraus T, Menze B, Raab W, Raithel HJ, Schneider WD, Strassburger K, Tuengerthal S, Woitowitz HJ (2003). “[Further development of the International Pneumoconiosis Classification–from ILO 1980 to ILO 2000 and to ILO 2000/German Federal Republic version]”. Pneumologie (in German). 57 (10): 576–84. doi:10.1055/s-2003-43020. PMID 14569528.
- ↑ Halldin CN, Blackley DJ, Petsonk EL, Laney AS (2017). “Pneumoconioses Radiographs in a Large Population of U.S. Coal Workers: Variability in A Reader and B Reader Classifications by Using the International Labour Office Classification”. Radiology. 284 (3): 870–876. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162437. PMID 28430556.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
