Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Pleural empyema laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prince Tano Djan, BSc, MBChB [2]

Overview

Overview

Diagnosis is confirmed by thoracentesis. Aspiration of the purulent fluid is necessary especially when condition is not resolving on antibiotics. The pleural fluid typically has a low pH (<7.20), low glucose (<60 mg/dL), and contains infectious organisms. Although the presence of pus or organisms on gram stain is extremely helpful in making a diagnosis of empyema, a positive bacteria culture from pleural fluid is not needed before diagnosis of empyema is comfirmed.[1][2]

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory Findings

Diagnosis is confirmed by thoracentesis. Aspiration of the purulent fluid is necessary especially when condition is not resolving on antibiotics. The pleural fluid typically has the following features:

  • Low pH (<7.20)
  • Low glucose (<60 mg/dL) and
  • Contains infectious organisms.

Although the presence of pus or organisms on gram stain is extremely helpful in making a diagnosis of empyema, a positive bacteria culture from pleural fluid is not needed before diagnosis of empyema is comfirmed.[1][2]

The COMPLES score has been developed to differentiate between tuberculous effusions with low pleural pH or glucose and complicated parapneumonic effusions.

The components are:

  • pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) (<46 IU/L [0 points]
  • The percentage of mononuclear cells (MNC %), ≥100 IU/L [6 points]), 46-100 IU/L [4 points], MNC % (<10 % [0 points], 10-50 [3 points], >50 [8 points])
  • PH, pH (<7.07 [0 points], 7.07-7.20 [3 points], >7.20 [5 points]),
  • Age.age (≥30 [0 points], <30 years [3 points])

A score of 12 or more points is highly sensitivity and specificity for complicated tuberculous pleural effusion.[3]

References

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mavroudis C, Ganzel BL, Cox SK, Polk HC (1987). “Experimental aerobic-anaerobic thoracic empyema in the guinea pig”. Ann Thorac Surg. 43 (3): 298–302. PMID 3548615.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Perez VP, Caierão J, Fischer GB, Dias CA, d’Azevedo PA (2016). “Pleural effusion with negative culture: a challenge for pneumococcal diagnosis in children”. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 86 (2): 200–4. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.022. PMID 27527890.
  3. Corral-Gudino L, García-Zamalloa A, Prada-González C, Bielsa S, Alexis D, Taboada-Gómez J; et al. (2016). “Development and Validation of the COMPLES Score for Differentiating Between Tuberculous Effusions with Low Pleural pH or Glucose and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions”. Lung. 194 (5): 847–54. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9923-y. PMID 27401009.

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH