Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Pleural empyema medical therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Chetan Lokhande, M.B.B.S [2] Prince Tano Djan, BSc, MBChB [3]

Overview

Overview

The mainstay of therapy for empyema includes:[1] controlling the infectious focus, drainage of fluid and pus, re-expansion of the lung. This involes the use of antimicrobial agents, thrombolytics,[2][3] and drainage of the pleural space.[4][5][6] Pharmacologic therapies for acute empyema include either Ceftriaxone, Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Vancomycin or Linezolid, or TMP-SMX. The preferred regimen for subacute and chronic empyema is a combination of Clindamycin and Ceftriaxone.

Medical Therapy

Medical Therapy

The mainstay of therapy for empyema includes:[1] controlling the infectious focus, drainage of fluid and pus, re-expansion of the lung. This involes the use of antimicrobial agents, thrombolytics,[2][3] and drainage of the pleural space.[4][5][6] Pharmacologic therapies for acute empyema include either Ceftriaxone, Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Vancomycin or Linezolid, or TMP-SMX. The preferred regimen for subacute and chronic empyema is a combination of Clindamycin and Ceftriaxone.

Pharmacotherapy

Acute Pharmacotherapies

  • Appropriate antibiotics are indicated in all patients with an underlying infection. Drainage of the pleural space should be considered early, as delay of even a few days is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality.
    • Indications for chest tube drainage include:[4][5][6] a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross pus, or organisms on Gram’s stain.
      • In borderline cases, reassessment with a repeat tap should be preformed in 12 – 24 hours. If the LDH is increasing, and the pH and glucose are decreasing, a chest tube should be placed immediately.
      • The chest tube should be at least a 28 F (smaller tubes become obstructed with fibrin clot), and left in place until the drainage is clear and yellow, and its volume is < 50 cc/day.
      • Patients will get better within 24 – 48 hours. If they don’t, suspect inadequate drainage due to loculations or inappropriate antibiotics.
    • Fibrinolytic agents
      • Empyema drainage is facilitated by the use of intrapleural use of fibrinolytic agents .[7][8][9][10][11][12]
      • Surgical thoracotomy with decortication is preferred to thorascopic debridement in patients who have more pleural thickness , larger cavity and adhesions.[13][14][15]
      • Thrombolytics (mainly Urokinase and Streptokinase) have been used to break up loculations and assist drainage.[16][17]
      • The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
      • Two randomized studies comparing SK to chest tube drainage alone have shown an increase in the amount of drainage, however a statistical difference in the resolution of white blood cell (WBC) count and fever, the need for surgical drainage, or the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated.
    • More recently, however, VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) has been compared to treatment by treatment with SK and chest tube drainage (SK-CT) in randomized trials.[1]
      • Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs.
        • They felt that SK-CT only delayed, and did not prevent definitive treatment with VATS.
        • It should be noted, however, that the patients in Wait’s study had fibrinopurulent empyema, and not simple parapneumonic effusions or chronic empyema.
    • Obviously, the definitive answer is still out on the optimal management of empyema, however, the above data may indicate a more aggressive approach in these patients.

Antibiotic Therapy

Following are the guidelines to treat Pleural empyema .[18][19]


▸ Click on the following categories to expand treatment regimens.

Pleural Empyema

  ▸   Neonates

  ▸   Infants/Children

  ▸   Adult

Neonates
Preferred Regimen
Age 0-7 days and Weight ≤ 2000 gm
If MSSA
Nafcillin 25 mg/kg IV q12h
OR
Oxacillin 25 mg/kg IV q12h
If MRSA
Vancomycin 12.5 mg/kg IV q12h
Age 7-28 days and Weight ≤ 2000 gm
If MSSA
Nafcillin 25 mg/kg q8h
OR
Oxacillin 25 mg/kg IV q12h
If MRSA
Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q12h
Age 0-7 days and Weight > 2000 gm
If MSSA
Nafcillin 25 mg/kg q8h
OR
Oxacillin 25 mg/kg IV q12h
If MRSA
Vancomycin 18 mg/kg IV q12h
Age 7-28 days and Weight > 2000 gm
If MSSA
Nafcillin37 mg/kg q6h
OR
Oxacillin 37 mg/kg q6h
If MRSA
Vancomycin 22 mg/kg q12h
Infants/Children
Preferred Regimen
Cefotaxime 100 mg/kg IV q8h
OR
Ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg IV q24h
If MSSA
Vancomycin 40 mg/kg/day IV in 3-4 divided doses
With or Without
▸ ‘Cefotaxime 100 mg/kg IV q8h
OR
Ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg IV q24h
If H.Influenzae suspected
Adult
Preferred Regimen
For Strep. pneumoniae or Streptococcus sp (Group A)
Cefotaxime 2 gm IV q8h
OR
Ceftriaxone 2 gm IV q24h or Penicillin 12-18 million units IV divided q4h/day
OR
Ampicillin 8-12 gm IV divided q4h/day
For Staph. aureus
MSSA
Nafcillin2 gm IV q4h
OR
Oxacillin 2 gm IV q4h
MRSA
Vancomycin 10-15 mg/kg IV q8-12h
OR
Linezolid 600 mg IV q12h
For H. influenzae
Ceftriaxone 2 gm IV q24h
Subacute/Chronic
Clindamycin 450-900 mg IV q8h
PLUS
Ceftriaxone 2 gm IV q24h
Alternative Regimens
For Strep. pneumoniae or Streptococcus sp (Group A)
Vancomycin 1 gm IV q12h
For H. influenzae
TMP-SMX (5-10 mg/kg/day as trimethoprim component) IV/po in 2-3 divided doses
OR
Ampicillin Sulbactam 3 gm IV q6h (child dose 100-300 mg/kg/day IV divided q6h)
Chronic
Cefoxitin 2 gm IV q6-8h
OR
Imipenem 0.5 gm IV q6h
OR
Piperacillin Tazobactam 3.375 gm IV q6h (or 4-hour infusion of 3.375 gm q8h)
OR
Ampicillin Sulbactam 3 gm IV q6h
  • 1. Empiric antimicrobial therapy or culture negative therapy
  • Causative pathogens:
  • Streptococcus milleri
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Streptococcus intermedius
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Enterobacteriaceae
  • Escherichia coli
  • Fusobacterium spp.
  • Bacteroides spp.
  • Peptostreptococcus spp.
  • 2. Pathogen-based therapy
  • 2.1 Acute empyema
  • 2.1.1 Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A streptrococcus
  • 2.1.2 Staphylococcus aureus
  • 2.1.2.1 MSSA
  • 2.1.2.2 MRSA
  • 2.1.3 Hemophilus influenzae
  • 2.2 Subacute/chronic empyema
  • 2.2.1 Anaerobic streptococcus, Streptococcus milleri, Bacteroides species, Enterobacteriaceae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis
References

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Reichert M, Hecker M, Witte B, Bodner J, Padberg W, Weigand MA; et al. (2016). “Stage-directed therapy of pleural empyema”. Langenbecks Arch Surg. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1498-9. PMID 27815709.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S (2016). “Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas”. Lung. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2. PMID 27866276.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C; et al. (2011). “Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection”. N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Ashbaugh DG (1991). “Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality”. Chest. 99 (5): 1162–5. PMID 2019172.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Light RW (1995). “A new classification of parapneumonic effusions and empyema”. Chest. 108 (2): 299–301. PMID 7634854.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, Heffner J, Light R, Littenberg B; et al. (2000). “Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline”. Chest. 118 (4): 1158–71. PMID 11035692.
  7. Jerjes-Sánchez, C.; Ramirez-Rivera, A.; Elizalde, JJ.; Delgado, R.; Cicero, R.; Ibarra-Perez, C.; Arroliga, AC.; Padua, A.; Portales, A. (1996). “Intrapleural fibrinolysis with streptokinase as an adjunctive treatment in hemothorax and empyema: a multicenter trial”. Chest. 109 (6): 1514–9. PMID 8769503. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  8. Temes, RT.; Follis, F.; Kessler, RM.; Pett, SB.; Wernly, JA. (1996). “Intrapleural fibrinolytics in management of empyema thoracis”. Chest. 110 (1): 102–6. PMID 8681611. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. Davies, RJ.; Traill, ZC.; Gleeson, FV. (1997). “Randomised controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase in community acquired pleural infection”. Thorax. 52 (5): 416–21. PMID 9176531. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. Bouros, D.; Schiza, S.; Tzanakis, N.; Chalkiadakis, G.; Drositis, J.; Siafakas, N. (1999). “Intrapleural urokinase versus normal saline in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema. A randomized, double-blind study”. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 159 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9803094. PMID 9872815. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Diacon, AH.; Theron, J.; Schuurmans, MM.; Van de Wal, BW.; Bolliger, CT. (2004). “Intrapleural streptokinase for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions”. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 170 (1): 49–53. doi:10.1164/rccm.200312-1740OC. PMID 15044206. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Thomson, AH.; Hull, J.; Kumar, MR.; Wallis, C.; Balfour Lynn, IM. (2002). “Randomised trial of intrapleural urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema”. Thorax. 57 (4): 343–7. PMID 11923554. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  13. Thommi, G.; Nair, CK.; Aronow, WS.; Shehan, C.; Meyers, P.; McLeay, M. “Efficacy and safety of intrapleural instillation of alteplase in the management of complicated pleural effusion or empyema”. Am J Ther. 14 (4): 341–5. doi:10.1097/01.mjt.0000208275.88120.d1. PMID 17667208.
  14. Tuncozgur, B.; Ustunsoy, H.; Sivrikoz, MC.; Dikensoy, O.; Topal, M.; Sanli, M.; Elbeyli, L. (2001). “Intrapleural urokinase in the management of parapneumonic empyema: a randomised controlled trial”. Int J Clin Pract. 55 (10): 658–60. PMID 11777287. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. Tokuda, Y.; Matsushima, D.; Stein, GH.; Miyagi, S. (2006). “Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions: a meta-analysis”. Chest. 129 (3): 783–90. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.783. PMID 16537882. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  16. Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S (2016). “Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas”. Lung. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2. PMID 27866276.
  17. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C; et al. (2011). “Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection”. N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9
  18. Bradley, JS.; Byington, CL.; Shah, SS.; Alverson, B.; Carter, ER.; Harrison, C.; Kaplan, SL.; Mace, SE.; McCracken, GH. (2011). “The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America”. Clin Infect Dis. 53 (7): e25–76. doi:10.1093/cid/cir531. PMID 21880587. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. Rahman, NM.; Maskell, NA.; West, A.; Teoh, R.; Arnold, A.; Mackinlay, C.; Peckham, D.; Davies, CW.; Ali, N. (2011). “Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection”. N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH