
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions β written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
SAGES system classification scheme
Introduction
Overview
Overview
The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines for clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery is graded and linked to evidence using the definitions in SAGES system of grading.
Levels of Evidence and Scales[1]
Levels of Evidence and Scales[1]
| Levels of evidence and scales for grading | Definition |
|---|---|
| Level I | Evidence from properly conducted randomized, controlled trials |
| Level II | Evidence from controlled trials without randomization or Cohort or caseβcontrol studies or Multiple time series, dramatic uncontrolled experiments |
| Level III | Descriptive case series, opinions of expert panels |
| Grade A | Based on high-level (level I or II), well-performed studies with uniform interpretation and conclusions by the expert panel |
| Grade B | Based on high-level, well-performed studies with varying interpretation and conclusions by the expert panel |
| Grade C | Based on lower-level evidence (level II or less) with inconsistent findings and/or varying interpretations or conclusions by the expert panel |
References
References
- β Overby, DW.; Apelgren, KN.; Richardson, W.; Fanelli, R.; Overby, DW.; Apelgren, KN.; Beghoff, KR.; Curcillo, P.; Awad, Z. (2010). “SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery”. Surg Endosc. 24 (10): 2368β86. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. PMIDΒ 20706739. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vendhan Ramanujam M.B.B.S [2]
