Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Management of the thrombotic lesion

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-In-Chief: Brian C. Bigelow, M.D.

Overview

The presence of angiographically apparent thrombus is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. Thrombus often embolizes distally and causes no reflow and associated myonecrosis. There are two broad strategies to reduce thrombus burden: mechanical strategies and pharmacologic strategies.

Management of The Thrombotic Lesion

Differentiating Thrombus from Other Angiographic Abnormalities

Goals of Treatment

Goals in the management of the thrombotic lesion include:

Step-By-Step Strategy in the Management of the Thrombotic Lesion

Pharmacologic Therapy

Antiplatelet Therapy

Antithrombin Therapy

Thrombolytic Therapy

Mechanical Therapy

Thrombus Aspiration

Direct Stenting

Distal Protection

  • Distal Protection can be achieved with the following devices (Percusurge guardwire, Triactive, Spider wire, Proxis), particularly in saphenous vein grafts
  • Occlusive (Percusurge guardwire, Triactive) and filter (Filterwire) methods may improve safety and efficacy of PCI in patients with thrombotic lesions in SVG; SAFER study of Percusurge device demonstrated lower rate of death/MI
  • Distal embolic protection has not shown to be efficacious in the setting of STEMI in native coronary arteries with either Percusurge (EMERALD trial)[2] or Filterwire (PROMISE trial).[3]

Rheolytic Thrombectomy

Less Frequently Used Modalities

  • Directional Atherectomy
  • Transluminal Extraction Catheter (TEC)

Management of No Reflow

Distal embolization of thrombus often occurs, and you should be prepared to treat the patient for potential spasm or no-reflow with a calcium channel blocker, adenosine (100 mcg IC) or nitroprusside (100 mcg IC).

References

  1. White HD, Braunwald E, Murphy SA; et al. (2007). “Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in elderly and younger patients: results from ExTRACT-TIMI 25”. Eur. Heart J. 28 (9): 1066–71. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm081. PMID 17456482. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Nikolsky E, Stone GW, Lee E; et al. (2009). “Correlations between epicardial flow, microvascular reperfusion, infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior versus non-anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary or rescue angioplasty: analysis from the EMERALD trial”. EuroIntervention. 5 (4): 417–24. PMID 19755327. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Gick M, Jander N, Bestehorn HP; et al. (2005). “Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation”. Circulation. 112 (10): 1462–9. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545178. PMID 16129793. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WikiDoc Sources

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH