Esophageal candidiasis
For patient information page on this topic, click here.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: , Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Synonyms and keywords: Candidiasis of the esophagus; Candida of esophagus; Candidosis of esophagus; Esophageal thrush; Oesophageal thrush; candidal esophagitis; monilial esophagitis.
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Esophageal candidiasis is an opportunistic infection of the esophagus by Candida albicans. The disease occurs in patients in immunocompromised states, including post-chemotherapy and in AIDS. It is also known as candidal esophagitis or monilial esophagitis.
Historical Perspective
In 1839, B. Lagenbeck from Germany described a yeast-like fungus for the first time in the human oral infection thrush and its ability to cause it.
Classification
Esophageal candidiasis is classified according to the severity of lesions seen during endoscopy into 6 grades.
Pathophysiology
Candida is a normal commensal of the skin and mucous membranes. The balance between the virulence of the fungus and the host immune defense is responsible avoiding opportunistic infection of candida. Deficiency of cell-mediated immunity or poor general status are the main risk factors for having opportunistic candidiasis. Candidiasis is usually localized to skin and mucous membranes. In rare cases, candidiasis can spread causing candidemia and distant infection. These cases are usually associated with deficient immunity . C. albicans is the main species causing infection in humans more than any other candida species.
Causes
C. albicans is the main species causing infection in humans more than any other candida species.
Differentiating esophageal candidiasis from other diseases
Esophageal candidiasis should be differentiated from other diseases causing dysphagia especially in immunocompromised patients (e.g. herpes simplex esophagitis, CMV esophagitis).
Epidemiology and Demographics
Candidiasis is the most common cause of infectious esophagitis followed by HSV esophagitis.
Risk Factors
Immunodeficiency is the most important risk factor for candida esophagitis.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Candida esophagitis is very responsive to antifungal therapy. Complications can be systemic due to the spread of infection to the blood stream or local as esophageal stricture and obstruction.
Symptoms and Physical Examination
The underlying predisposing factors are usually clear on obtaining history (HIV, chemotherapy, etc ..). Odynophagia is the most common encountered symptom of esophageal candidiasis. Examination reveals signs of immunocompromisation that was the primary cause of developing esophageal thrush.
Diagnostic tests
Although the appearance of the patches during endoscopy is diagnostic for esophageal candidiasis, biopsies should be obtained to confirm the diagnosis. If the patient is not already diagnosed with HIV or another immunocompromising disease, screening should be done.
Medical therapy
Esophageal candidiasis is almost always treated with systemic antifungals (either parentral or oral). A trial of antifungal therapy is done before performing endoscopy in HIV patients with esophagitis.
Surgery
Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of esophageal candidiasis unless complications ensue.
Primary Prevention
There is no established method for prevention of candida esophagitis.
Secondary prevention
There are no secondary preventive measures available for candida esophagitis.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2], Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3], Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [4]
Overview
In 1839, B. Lagenbeck from Germany described a yeast-like fungus for the first time in the human oral infection thrush and its ability to cause it.
Historical Perspective
- In 1839, B. Lagenbeck from Germany described a yeast-like fungus for the first time in the human oral infection thrush and its ability to cause it.[1]
- In 1923 the Candida albicans was described by Christine Marie Berkhout. Over the years the classification of the genera and species has evolved. Obsolete names for this genus include Mycotorula and Torulopsis. The species has also been known in the past as Monilia albicans and Oidium albicans. The current classification is nomen conservandum, which means the name is authorized for use by the International Botanical Congress (IBC).
- The full current taxonomic classification is available at Candida albicans.
- The genus Candida includes about 150 different species. However, only a few of those are known to cause human infections. c. albicans is the most significant pathogenic (disease-causing) species. Other Candida species causing diseases in humans include c. tropicalis, c. glabrata, c. krusei, c. parapsilosis, c. dubliniensis, and c. lusitaniae.
References
- ↑ Barnett JA (2008). “A history of research on yeasts 12: medical yeasts part 1, Candida albicans”. Yeast. 25 (6): 385–417. doi:10.1002/yea.1595. PMID 18509848.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Esophageal candidiasis is classified according to the severity of lesions seen during endoscopy.
Classification
Kodsi grading for endoscopic severity of esophageal candidiasis:
Esophageal candidiasis is graded according to severity of the lesions on endoscopy into:[1]
- Grade I: few raised lesions (< 2 mm) without surrounding edema nor laceration
- Grade II: multiple raised lesions (> 2mm) without surrounding edema nor laceration
- Grade III: linear, nodular and confluent lesions
- Grade IV: same as grade III with narrowing of the lumen and friability of the mucosa
- Grade V: thick white plaque covering the lumen in circumferential manner causing narrowing of the lumen
- Grade VI: endoscopy can detect oropharyngeal candidiasis
References
- ↑ Asayama N, Nagata N, Shimbo T, Nishimura S, Igari T, Akiyama J, Ohmagari N, Hamada Y, Nishijima T, Yazaki H, Teruya K, Oka S, Uemura N (2014). “Relationship between clinical factors and severity of esophageal candidiasis according to Kodsi’s classification”. Dis. Esophagus. 27 (3): 214–9. doi:10.1111/dote.12102. PMID 23826847.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Candida is a normal commensal of the skin and mucous membranes. The balance between the virulence of the fungus and the host immune defense is responsible avoiding opportunistic infection of candida. Deficiency of cell-mediated immunity or poor general status are the main risk factors for having opportunistic candidiasis. Candidiasis is usually localized to skin and mucous membranes. In rare cases, candidiasis can spread causing candidemia and distant infection. These cases are usually associated with deficient immunity . C. albicans is the main species causing infection in humans more than any other candida species.
Pathophysiology
Pathogenesis
Candida is a normal commensal of skin and mucous membranes. A competent immune system and an intact regenerating healthy mucosa oppose the virulence of Candida.
Candida Virulence factors
The main virulence factors that mediate the infection:[1]
- Secreting molecules that mediate adherence into host cells
- Production of hydrolases which has a lytic effect on tissues and facilitate the invasion by the fungus.
- Polymorphism: Candida has the ability to grow either as pseudohyphae (elongated ellipsoid form) or in a yeast form (rounded to oval budding form. While the role of polymorphism is not clearly understood in the virulence of Candida, it’s noted that the species that are capable of producing the most severe form of the disease has this ability.
- Biofilm production: which means the ability to form a thick layer of the organism on the mucosal surfaces or even on catheters and dentures.
Any condition that compromises cell-mediated immunity, worsens the general status of the patient or provide a favorable medium for Candida to form biofilms put the patient at increased risk for having candidiasis.[2]
Candidal gene VPS4 plays an important role in mucosal candidiasis specifically. Moreover, fungi with mutations affecting this gene were found to be less virulent.[3][4]
Gross Pathology
By upper endoscopy, candida esophagitis appears as white patches on the esophageal mucosa.
{{#ev:youtube|PKK-V07AXv8}}
Microscopic pathology:
![]() |
`
- Microscopic examination of the wet mount with 10% KOH or saline demonstrates hyphae, pseudohyphae, and blastospores.
References
- ↑ Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B (2013). “Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms”. Virulence. 4 (2): 119–28. doi:10.4161/viru.22913. PMC 3654610. PMID 23302789.
- ↑ Pappas PG (2006). “Invasive candidiasis”. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 20 (3): 485–506. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2006.07.004. PMID 16984866.
- ↑ Rane HS, Hardison S, Botelho C, Bernardo SM, Wormley F, Lee SA (2014). “Candida albicans VPS4 contributes differentially to epithelial and mucosal pathogenesis”. Virulence. 5 (8): 810–8. doi:10.4161/21505594.2014.956648. PMID 25483774.
- ↑ Lee SA, Jones J, Hardison S, Kot J, Khalique Z, Bernardo SM, Lazzell A, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot J (2009). “Candida albicans VPS4 is required for secretion of aspartyl proteases and in vivo virulence”. Mycopathologia. 167 (2): 55–63. doi:10.1007/s11046-008-9155-7. PMID 18814053.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
C. albicans is the main species causing infection in humans more than any other candida species.
Causes
Most common causes:
Candida albicans is the most common cause of Esophageal candidiasis.[1][2]
Less common causes:
Other candida strains can cause Esophageal candidiasis:[1][2]
In immunocompromised patients:
Specific species of candida were isolated from immunocompromised patients:[3]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Barchiesi F, Morbiducci V, Ancarani F, Scalise G (1993). “Emergence of oropharyngeal candidiasis caused by non-albicans species of Candida in HIV-infected patients”. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 9 (4): 455–6. PMID 8243605.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sangeorzan JA, Bradley SF, He X, Zarins LT, Ridenour GL, Tiballi RN, Kauffman CA (1994). “Epidemiology of oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: colonization, infection, treatment, and emergence of fluconazole resistance”. Am. J. Med. 97 (4): 339–46. PMID 7942935.
- ↑ Bonacini M, Young T, Laine L (1991). “The causes of esophageal symptoms in human immunodeficiency virus infection. A prospective study of 110 patients”. Arch. Intern. Med. 151 (8): 1567–72. PMID 1651690.
Differentiating esophageal candidiasis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Esophageal candidiasis should be differentiated from other diseases causing dysphagia especially in immunocompromised patients (e.g. herpes simplex esophagitis, CMV esophagitis)
Differentiating esophageal candidiasis from other diseases
Esophageal candidiasis should be differentiated from other diseases causing dysphagia especially in immunocompromised patients.
| Prominent clinical features | Endoscopy findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candida esophagitis |
|
![]() | |
| HSV esophagitis |
|
![]() | |
| CMV esophagitis |
|
|
|
| Esophageal lymphoma |
|
|
Candida esophagitis should also be differentiated from other less common causes of dysphagia as
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Esophageal achalasia
- Pill esophagitis
- Eosinophilic esophagitis
References
- ↑ Becker K, Lübke HJ, Borchard F, Häussinger D (1996). “[Inflammatory esophageal diseases caused by herpes simplex virus infections–overview and report of 15 personal cases]”. Z Gastroenterol (in German). 34 (5): 286–95. PMID 8686361.
- ↑ Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Cho KC, Beranbaum E (1987). “Cytomegalovirus esophagitis in AIDS: radiographic features in 16 patients”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 149 (5): 919–23. doi:10.2214/ajr.149.5.919. PMID 2823585.
- ↑ Ghimire P, Wu GY, Zhu L (2010). “Primary esophageal lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: Two case reports and literature review”. World J Radiol. 2 (8): 334–8. doi:10.4329/wjr.v2.i8.334. PMC 2999330. PMID 21160688.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Candidiasis is the most common cause of infectious esophagitis followed by HSV esophagitis.
Epidemiology and demographics
- Esophageal candidiasis has not been adequately studied in immunocompetent individuals.
- Candidiasis is the most common cause of infectious esophagitis followed by HSV esophagitis.[1][2]
Age
Candida esophagitis is more common in patients older than 55 years old.[3][2]
Prevalence among HIV patients
- In a study conducted in 2015, the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis was 11.2% in HIV infected individuals and 2.9% in HIV infected individuals.[4]
- Esophageal candidiasis has been reported in 10-15% of immunocompromised patients during their lifetime.[5]
- Autopsies revealed isolation of candida in 43% of immunocompromised individuals.[6]
References
- ↑ Chen LI, Chang JM, Kuo MC, Hwang SJ, Chen HC (2007). “Combined herpes viral and candidal esophagitis in a CAPD patient: case report and review of literature”. Am. J. Med. Sci. 333 (3): 191–3. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318031b1f2. PMID 17496741.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Choi JH, Lee CG, Lim YJ, Kang HW, Lim CY, Choi JS (2013). “Prevalence and risk factors of esophageal candidiasis in healthy individuals: a single center experience in Korea”. Yonsei Med. J. 54 (1): 160–5. doi:10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.160. PMC 3521253. PMID 23225813.
- ↑ Kliemann DA, Pasqualotto AC, Falavigna M, Giaretta T, Severo LC (2008). “Candida esophagitis: species distribution and risk factors for infection”. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo. 50 (5): 261–3. PMID 18949340.
- ↑ Takahashi Y, Nagata N, Shimbo T, Nishijima T, Watanabe K, Aoki T, Sekine K, Okubo H, Watanabe K, Sakurai T, Yokoi C, Mimori A, Oka S, Uemura N, Akiyama J (2015). “Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Predictive of Candida Esophagitis and Erosive Esophagitis in HIV and Non-HIV Patients: An Endoscopy-Based Cross-Sectional Study of 6011 Patients”. Medicine (Baltimore). 94 (47): e2138. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002138. PMC 5059007. PMID 26632738.
- ↑ Underwood JA, Williams JW, Keate RF (2003). “Clinical findings and risk factors for Candida esophagitis in outpatients”. Dis. Esophagus. 16 (2): 66–9. PMID 12823199.
- ↑ Weerasuriya N, Snape J (2006). “A study of candida esophagitis in elderly patients attending a district general hospital in the UK”. Dis. Esophagus. 19 (3): 189–92. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00563.x. PMID 16722997.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Immunodeficiency is the most important risk factor for candida esophagitis.
Risk factors
Immunodeficiency is the most important risk factor for candida esophagitis[1]
- People with an immune deficiency (e.g. as a result of AIDS/HIV)
- Organ transplantation patients
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy
- Patients undergoing radiotherapy
- Hematologic malagninacies
Risk factors in immunocompetent individuals
- Esophageal stasis (achalasia, esophageal cancer)[2]
- Malnutrition
- Alcoholism
References
- ↑ Kodsi BE, Wickremesinghe C, Kozinn PJ, Iswara K, Goldberg PK (1976). “Candida esophagitis: a prospective study of 27 cases”. Gastroenterology. 71 (5): 715–9. PMID 964563.
- ↑ “Candidaesophagitis | SpringerLink”.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]
Overview
Candida esophagitis is very responsive to antifungal therapy. Complications can be systemic due to the spread of infection to the blood stream or local as esophageal stricture and obstruction.
Natural history
If left untreated, complications as esophageal stricture and candidaemia ensue.
Complications
Complications can be systemic due to spread of candida or localized due to the local invasion of the fungus.[1]
- Systemic spread and fungemia
- Esophageal perforation
- Tracheoesophageal fistula
- Esophageal stricture
- Esophageal obstruction
Prognosis
- Prognosis is excellent and Esophageal candidiaisis is usually responsive to antifungal treatment.
- Recurrence is common after treatment due to persistence of the predisposing immunosuppression.
References
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH



