Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Cerebral palsy

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2], Iqra Qamar M.D.[3], Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [4]

Synonyms and keywords:

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2], Iqra Qamar M.D.[3], Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [4]

Overview

Cerebral palsy is defined as a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that are attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain. Cerebral palsy can be classified based on the number of limbs involved, physiologically and functionally. The motor disorders of cerebral palsy often are accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems. Intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia are the two main pathologies that play a vital role in the development of cerebral palsy. Birth asphyxia is believed to be the principal etiology for cerebral palsy. However, recent studies demonstrated that 70% to 80% of cases of cerebral palsy are due to antenatal factors, while only 10% to 28% of cases are due to birth asphyxia in term and near-term infants. The incidence of cerebral palsy is approximately 150-250 per 100,000 live births worldwide. Decline in the trends of cerebral palsy is due to advances in perinatal care. The prevalence of different motor patterns of cerebral palsy has remained remarkably static over the last 20 years. Common risk factors in the development of cerebral palsy include prematurity, fetal birth asphyxia, multiple births, and maternal illness. The most common symptoms of cerebral palsy include abnormal [[muscle tone]- early hypotonia followed by spasticity, gross motor developmental delay, definite hand preference before age 1 year, failure to crawl, failure to thrive or growth failure. The d]iagnosis of cerebral palsy is clinical and there is no specific test to confirm the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. MRI is the diagnostic neuroimaging study of choice and findings include hypoxic-ischemic lesions, cortical malformations, and lesions of the basal ganglia. Pharmacologic medical therapies for cerebral palsy include botulinum toxin, intrathecal baclofen, and oral antispastics.

Historical Perspective

The first detailed medical descriptions for cerebral palsy dates back to the era of Hippocrates in his work “Corpus Hippocraticum”. Although there is lack of detailed medical descriptions from before the 19th century, mentions to cerebral palsy can be found in representational art, literary sources and paleopathology. In 1827, Jean Baptiste Cazauvieilh was the first to report cerebral atrophy in individuals with congenital paralysis and tried to distinguish between lesions in the developing brain with those related to trauma. In 1853, Little named spastic diplegia as Little’s disease. In 1861, after twenty years of experience and nearly 200 cases, Little put forth a theory that asphyxia at birth could cause permanent central nervous system damage in cerebral palsy patients. Between 1891 and 1897, Sigmund Freud was the first to describe a classification system for cerebral palsy in his several volumes entitled “Cerebral Palsy”. In 1953, Virginia Apgar generated a scoring system, “APGAR” that forced obstetricians to examine the condition of newborns at birth and assess the need for treatment.

Classification

Cerebral palsy can be classified based on number of limbs involved, physiologically and functionally. Based on number of limbs involved cerebral palsy can be classified into monoplegia, hemiplegia, diplegia, paraplegia and quadriplegia. Physiologically, cerebral palsy can be divided into a spastic type (pyramidal), and an extrapyramidal type. The extrapyramidal types of cerebral palsy include athetoid, choreiform, ataxic, rigid, and hypotonic. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) are two most commonly employed systems for functional classification of cerebral palsy. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on the children’s self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) also classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on self-initiated movement abilities, in particular sitting and walking.

Pathophysiology

Cerebral palsy is defined as a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that are attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain. The motor disorders of cerebral palsy often are accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems. Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) are the two main pathologies that play a vital role in the development of cerebral palsy. The insult to the brain is believed to occur between the time of conception and age 2 years, at which time a significant amount of motor development has occurred. Intraventricular hemorrhage is defined as a condition in which bleeding from the subependymal matrix occurs into the ventricles of the brain. Preterm infants are at increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage because of underdeveloped blood vessels. Ischemia and infection are two important factors that play a vital role in the pathogenesis of periventricular leukomalacia. Since preterm and even term neonates have low cerebral blood flow, the periventricular white matter is susceptible to ischemic damage resulting in motor damage.

Causes

Birth asphyxia is believed to be the principal etiology for cerebral palsy. However, recent studies demonstrated that 70% to 80% of cases of cerebral palsy are due to antenatal factors, while only 10% to 28% of cases are due to birth asphyxia in term and near-term infants. Causes of cerebral palsy are often multifactorial.

Differentiating Cerebral palsy from Other Diseases

Cerebral palsy must be differentiated from other diseases that cause spasticity, hypotonia, ataxia and dystonia such as inherited metabolic disorders, intellectual disability, metabolic myopathies, metabolic neuropathy, traumatic peripheral nerve lesions, tumors of the conus and cauda equina and vascular malformations of the spinal cord.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of cerebral palsy is approximately 150-250 per 100,000 live births worldwide. Decline in the trends of cerebral palsy is due to advances in perinatal care. The prevalence of different motor patterns of cerebral palsy has remained remarkably static over the last 20 years. Most patients are identified by 2 years of age due to delayed motor milestones. Cerebral palsy usually affects individuals of the black non-Hispanic children race. White non-Hispanic children are less likely to develop cerebral palsy. Males are more commonly affected by cerebral palsy than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.5 to 1.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of cerebral palsy include prematurity, fetal birth asphyxia, multiple gestation, maternal illness, fetal brain malformation, maternal teratogen exposure, low socioeconomic status, nonvertex presentation, postmaturity, and head injury.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Although the neurologic deficit is permanent and non-progressive, if cerebral palsy is left untreated it can have a dynamic effect on growth and development of the patient resulting in gait abnormalities. Cerebral palsy affects multiple systems. Common complications include contractures, hip dislocation, scoliosis, failure to thrive, dental caries (enamel dysgenesis, malocclusion, and gingival hyperplasia), increased risk of aspiration pneumonia, bronchiolitis/asthma, epilepsy, and mental retardation.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of cerebral palsy is clinical and there is no specific test to confirm the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Diagnostic evaluation may include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, electroencephalography (EEG), lumbar puncture, metabolic and genetic testing and, screening for thrombophilia.

History and Symptoms

A positive history of failure to meet the expected developmental milestones, failure to suppress the primitive reflexes, intellectual disability or mental retardation, visual or hearing problems, speech or language problems, and oromotor dysfunction is suggestive of cerebral palsy. The most common symptoms of cerebral palsy include abnormal muscle tone– early hypotonia followed by spasticity, gross motor developmental delay, definite hand preference before age 1 year, failure to crawl, failure to thrive or growth failure. Less common symptoms of cerebral palsy may include hypotonia with decreased resistance to movement.

Physical Examination

Patients with cerebral palsy usually have abnormal neck or truncal tone, asymmetric posture, abnormal strength, gait and coordination. Physical examination of patients with cerebral palsy is usually remarkable for neuromuscular findings such as tremors or involuntary movements, athetosis, chorea, muscle rigidity, sensory loss, diplegia/hemiplegia/quadriplegia, intellectual disability, dystonia, normal/increased/decreased tone, persistent or asymmetric fisting, abnormal oromotor patterns, tongue retraction and thrust, tonic bite, oral hypersensitivity, grimacing, poor head control and spastic cerebral palsy presents with features of upper motor neuron lesion.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with cerebral palsy. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) recommends lab studies if there is no specific structural abnormality present-, the presence of atypical features in history or physical examination and cerebral palsy associated with brain malformation. Following labs may help to rule out other diseases and may include thyroid function tests, lactate and pyruvate levels, organic and amino acids, ammonia levels and chromosomal analysis

Electrocardiogram

There are no diagnostic ECG findings associated with cerebral palsy. Findings on an ECG suggestive of cerebral palsy may include increased heart rate, shorter PR interval and shorter QRS duration.

X-ray

There are no diagnostic x-ray findings associated with cerebral palsy. An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of complications of cerebral palsy which include recurrent aspirations and scoliosis.

Ultrasound

Cranial ultrasonographic findings may include intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic injury to the periventricular white matter and periventricular leukomalacia.

CT scan

CT scan findings suggestive of cerebral palsy may include congenital malformations, intracranial hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia.

MRI

MRI is the diagnostic neuroimaging study of choice especially for older children and is preferred over CT scan. The diagnostic yield of MRI depends upon the type of CP (mixed > quadriplegic > hemiplegic > diplegic > ataxic > dyskinetic) and the timing of birth. MRI findings in patients with CP may include hypoxic-ischemic lesions (eg, periventricular leukomalacia-PVL), cortical malformations and lesions of the basal ganglia.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with cerebral palsy.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for cerebral palsy may include electroencephalography, EMG and nerve conduction studies, placental examination, and screening for associated conditions such as intellectual disability, visual impairment, hearing impairment, speech and language impairment.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Pharmacologic medical therapies for cerebral palsy include botulinum toxin, intrathecal baclofen, and oral antispastics. The management of cerebral palsy should be individualized according to the patient’s need and status of disease. The disease itself is not progressive but the presentations might change with the maturation of the brain and the development of the skeletal system. Medical therapy aims at improvement of the motor function through relieving the spasticity of the limbs and preventing the occurrence of convulsions.

Surgery

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with cerebral palsy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with severe disease causing functional abnormalities. Surgical interventions include selective dorsal rhizotomy and tendon lengthening or transfer. n lengthening or transfer.

Primary Prevention

Effective measures for the primary prevention of cerebral palsy include avoiding preterm birth, avoiding complicated delivery and avoiding head trauma in the neonate.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of cerebral palsy.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

The first detailed medical descriptions for cerebral palsy dates back to the era of Hippocrates in his work “Corpus Hippocraticum”. Although there is lack of detailed medical descriptions from before the 19th century, mentions to cerebral palsy can be found in representational art, literary sources and paleopathology. In 1827, Jean Baptiste Cazauvieilh was the first to report cerebral atrophy in individuals with congenital paralysis and tried to distinguish between lesions in the developing brain with those related to trauma. In 1853, Little named spastic diplegia as Little’s disease. In 1861, after twenty years of experience and nearly 200 cases, Little put forth a theory that asphyxia at birth could cause permanent central nervous system damage in cerebral palsy patients. Between 1891 and 1897, Sigmund Freud was the first to describe a classification system for cerebral palsy in his several volumes entitled “Cerebral Palsy”. In 1953, Virginia Apgar generated a scoring system, “APGAR” that forced obstetricians to examine the condition of newborns at birth and assess the need for treatment.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1827, Jean Baptiste Cazauvieilh was the first to report cerebral atrophy in individuals with congenital paralysis and tried to distinguish between lesions in the developing brain with those related to trauma.[1][2]
  • In 1829, Jean Cruveilhier and Carl Rokitansky reported isolated cases of cerebral atrophy in children.
  • In 1842, Eduard Heinrich Henonch in his dissertation, “Die Atrophia Cerebri”, described the cerebral changes associated with infantile hemiplegia.
  • In 1832, William John Little, the founder of orthopedic surgery in England successfully corrected his own clubfoot using George Fredrick Louis Stromeyer’s technique of subcutaneous tenotomy.
  • In 1853, Little named spastic diplegia as Little’s disease.
  • In 1861, after twenty years of experience and nearly 200 cases, Little put forth a theory that asphyxia at birth could cause permanent central nervous system damage in cerebral palsy patients.
  • In 1868, Jean Louis Cotard, under the guidance of Jean Martin Charcot (1825–1893), a French neurologist, analyzed the different etiologies of cerebral paralysis, especially trauma, and described partial atrophy of the brain in these conditions.
  • In 1882, James Ross proposed the idea that most cases of spastic paraplegia in infancy are due to a porencephalic defect of the cortical motor centers.
  • In 1887, Victor Hutintel suggested that congenital hemiplegia might result from localized encephalomalacia, which is secondary to venous congestion, stasis, thrombosis, and hemorrhage.
  • Between 1891 and 1897, Sigmund Freud was the first to describe a classification system for cerebral palsy in his several volumes entitled “Cerebral Palsy”.
  • In 1925, Schaltenbrand was the first to describe normal motor development in great detail and was later elaborated on by McGraw in 1943.
  • In 1947, Strauss and Lehtinen noticed for the first time that behavioral and emotional abnormalities are common in children with cerebral palsy.
  • In the 1950’s, Andreas Peto developed conductive education with the objective to enable children with cerebral palsy to walk in order to be able to integrate them as well as possible into the regular educational system.
  • In 1953, Virginia Apgar generated a scoring system, “APGAR” that forced obstetricians to examine the condition of newborns at birth and assess the need for treatment.
  • In 1959, Crothers and Paine pioneered a multidisciplinary approach for the evaluation of cerebral palsy, based on the classification of muscle tone and neurological syndromes.
  • In 1961, Erich Saling & Damaschke developed the micro-assay for sampling blood gas which allowed the diagnosis of acidosis and hypoxia using small quantities of blood.
  • In 1964, Crothers and Paine, along with Ingram, studied cerebral palsy patients with cerebellar involvement and discovered a form of cerebral palsy in which ataxia is present.
  • In 1964, Prechtl and Beintema developed an examination system based on primitive reflex status and their relevance as a diagnostic tool to functionally assess the young nervous system, is especially important in predicting cerebral palsy and minor neurological deficits.
  • In 1967, Christensen and Melchior published in detail the first book on cerebral palsy concentrating on clinical and neuropathological studies and related these to aetiological and pathogenic factors.

References

  1. Panteliadis C, Panteliadis P, Vassilyadi F (2013). “Hallmarks in the history of cerebral palsy: from antiquity to mid-20th century”. Brain Dev. 35 (4): 285–92. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2012.05.003. PMID 22658818.
  2. Rock I, Nijhawan R, Palmer S, Tudor L (1992). “Grouping based on phenomenal similarity of achromatic color”. Perception. 21 (6): 779–89. doi:10.1068/p210779. PMID 1297981.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Cerebral palsy can be classified based on number of limbs involved, physiologically and functionally. Based on number of limbs involved cerebral palsy can be classified into monoplegia, hemiplegia, diplegia, paraplegia and quadriplegia. Physiologically, cerebral palsy can be divided into a spastic type (pyramidal), and an extrapyramidal type. The extrapyramidal types of cerebral palsy include athetoid, choreiform, ataxic, rigid, and hypotonic. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) are two most commonly employed systems for functional classification of cerebral palsy. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on the children’s self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) also classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on self-initiated movement abilities, in particular sitting and walking.

Classification

Topographical Distribution

Based on number of limbs involved cerebral palsy can be classified into 4 subtypes

TYPE Involved Limb
Monoplegia One extremity involved, usually lower
Hemiplegia Both extremities on the same side involved 

Usually, upper extremity involved more than lower extremity

Paraplegia Both lower extremities equally involved
Diplegia Lower extremities more involved than upper extremities 

Fine-motor/sensory abnormalities in upper extremity

Quadriplegia All extremities involved equally 

Normal head/neck control

Double hemiplegia All extremities involved, upper more than lower

Physiologic classification

Physiologically, cerebral palsy can be divided into a spastic type, which affects the corticospinal tracts (pyramidal) , and an extrapyramidal type, which affects the other regions of the developing brain. The extrapyramidal types of cerebral palsy include athetoid, choreiform, ataxic, rigid, and hypotonic.[1]


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cerebral palsy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pyramidal
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extrapyramidal
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spastic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spastic diplegia
 
Spastic hemiplegia
 
Spastic quadriplegia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Athetoid
 
Choreiform
 
Rigid
 
Ataxic
 
Hypotonic

Spastic

  • Spastic cerebral palsy is the most common form of cerebral palsy.[2]
  • Spastic cerebral palsy is usually associated with injury to the pyramidal tracts in the immature brain.
  • Spasticity is caused due to exaggeration of the normal musclepassive stretch reflex.
  • Histologically altered muscle function leads to the deposition of type I collagen in the endomysium of the affected muscle, leading to thickening and fibrosis, the degree of which correlated to the severity of the spasticity.
  • Simultaneous co-contraction of normally antagonistic muscle groups leads to fatigue, loss of dexterity and coordination, and balance difficulties.

Athetoid

  • Athetoid cerebral palsy is caused by an injury to the extrapyramidal tracts.
  • Athetoid cerebral palsy is characterized by dyskinetic, purposeless movements that may be exacerbated by environmental stimulation.
  • With the improvements in prevention of Rh incompatibility leading to kernicterus, the incidence of athetoid cerebral palsy is decreasing.
  • Dystonia, characterized by an increased overall tone and distorted positioning in response to voluntary movements, or hypotonia also can occur with athetoid cerebral palsy.

Choreiform

  • Choreiform cerebral palsy is characterized by continual purposeless movements of the patient’s wrists, fingers, toes, and ankles.
  • This continuous movement can make bracing and sitting difficult.

Rigid

  • Patients with rigid cerebral palsy are the most hypertonic of all cerebral palsy patients.
  • Hypertonicity occurs in the absence of hyperreflexia, spasticity, and clonus, which are common in spastic cerebral palsy.
  • Patients with rigid cerebral palsy have a “cogwheel” or “lead pipe” muscle stiffness that often requires surgical release.

Ataxic

  • Ataxic cerebral palsy is a very rare type.
  • Ataxic cerebral palsy is characterized by the disturbance of coordinated movement as a result of an injury to the developing cerebellum.
  • It is important to distinguish true ataxia from spasticity because with treatment many children with ataxia are able to improve their gait function without surgery.

Hypotonic

  • Hypotonic cerebral palsy is characterized by weakness in conjunction with low muscle tone and normal deep tendon reflexes.
  • Many children who ultimately develop spastic or ataxic cerebral palsy pass through a hypotonic stage lasting 1 or 2 years before the true nature of their brain injury becomes apparent.
  • Persistent hypotonia can lead to difficulties with sitting balance, head positioning, and communication.

Functional Classification of Cerebral Palsy

The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) are two most commonly employed systems for functional classification of cerebral palsy.[3]

Manual Ability Classification System

The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on the children’s self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life.[4]

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Does the child handle most kind of
daily activities independently
( during play and leisure, eating and dressing)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Does the child handle even more difficult tasks
with fair speed and accuracy and
does not need alternative ways to perform
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Does the child perform number of mannual tasks
which commonly need to prepared or adapted
and help is needed occasionally
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Yes
 
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
Handles objects easily and successfully
 
Level 2
Handles most objects with
reduced quality and speed of acheivement
 
 
 
Level 3
Handles objects with
difficulty but needs preparation
 
 
Can the child perform
easy activites with frequent support
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
 
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 4
Handles easy activites
with limitations and support
 
 
 
Level 5
Cannot handle daily activites
has severely limited abilities to perform even simple actions

Gross Motor Function Classification System

The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) also classifies children with cerebral palsy into five levels. The levels are based on self-initiated movement abilities, in particular sitting and walking.[5]

Level Description
1
  • Can walk at home, school, outdoors and in the community without any support.
  • Can climb stairs without the use of a railing.
  • Can perform gross motor skills such as running and jumping, but speed, balance, and coordination are limited.
2
  • Can walk in most settings and climb stairs holding onto a railing.
  • May experience difficulty walking long distances and balancing on uneven terrain, inclines, in crowded areas or confined spaces.
  • Can walk with physical assistance, a handheld mobility device or used wheeled mobility over long distances.
  • Have only minimal ability to perform gross motor skills such as running and jumping.
3
  • Can walk using a hand-held mobility device in most indoor settings.
  • Can may climb stairs holding onto a railing with supervision or assistance.
  • Can use wheeled mobility when traveling long distances and may self-propel for shorter distances.
4
  • Can use methods of mobility that require physical assistance or powered mobility in most settings.
  • Can walk for short distances at home with physical assistance or use powered mobility or a body support walker when positioned.
  • At school, outdoors and in the community children are transported in a manual wheelchair or use powered mobility.
5
  • Children are transported in a manual wheelchair in all settings.
  • Children are limited in their ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures and control leg and arm movements.

References

  1. Agarwal A, Verma I (2012). “Cerebral palsy in children: An overview”. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 3 (2): 77–81. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2012.09.001. PMC 3872805. PMID 26403442.
  2. Shamsoddini A, Amirsalari S, Hollisaz MT, Rahimnia A, Khatibi-Aghda A (2014). “Management of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy”. Iran J Pediatr. 24 (4): 345–51. PMC 4339555. PMID 25755853.
  3. Compagnone E, Maniglio J, Camposeo S, Vespino T, Losito L, De Rinaldis M, Gennaro L, Trabacca A (2014). “Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: correlations between the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS), the manual ability classification system (MACS) and the communication function classification system (CFCS)”. Res Dev Disabil. 35 (11): 2651–7. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.005. PMID 25062096.
  4. Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J (2017). “Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy”. Children (Basel). 4 (4). doi:10.3390/children4040030. PMC 5406689. PMID 28441773.
  5. Carnahan KD, Arner M, Hägglund G (2007). “Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children”. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 8: 50. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-50. PMC 1919364. PMID 17584944.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Cerebral palsy is defined as a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that are attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain. The motor disorders of cerebral palsy often are accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems. Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)are the two main pathologies that play a vital role in the development of cerebral palsy. The insult to the brain is believed to occur between the time of conception and age 2 years, at which time a significant amount of motor development has occurred. Intraventricular hemorrhage is defined as a condition in which bleeding from the subependymal matrix occurs into the ventricles of the brain. Preterm infants are at increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage because of underdeveloped blood vessels. Ischemia and infection are two important factors that play a vital role in the pathogenesis of periventricular leukomalacia. Since preterm and even term neonates have low cerebral blood flow, the periventricular white matter is susceptible to ischemic damage resulting in motor damage.

Pathophysiology

Cerebral palsy is defined as a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that are attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain. The motor disorders of cerebral palsy often are accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems. Generally there are three distinctive features common to all patients with cerebral palsy:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

  • Motor impairment, which distinguishes it from global developmental delay or autism.
  • An initial insult to the developing brain
  • A neurologic deficit that is nonprogressive

Initial Insult

  • The insult to the brain is believed to occur between the time of conception and age 2 years, at which time a significant amount of motor development has occurred.
  • A similar injury to the brain after age 2 years can have a similar effect, however, and often is results in classic picture of cerebral palsy.
  • By 8 years of age, most of the development of the immature brain is complete, as is gait development, and an insult to the brain results in a more adult-type clinical picture and outcome.
Major events in human brain development Peak times of occurrence
Primary neurulation Weeks 3-4
Prosencephalic development Months 2-3 of gestation
Neuronal proliferation Months 3-4 of gestation
Neuronal migration Months 3-5 of gestation
Organization Month 5 of gestation to years postnatal
Myelination Birth to years postnatal

Pathogenesis

  • Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) are the two main pathologies that play a vital role in the development of cerebral palsy.
  • Corticospinal tracts composing of descending motor axons traverse through the periventricular region which is commonly injured in PVL and IVH leading to cerebral palsy.
  • Although both pathologies increase the risk of cerebral palsy, periventricular leukomalacia is more closely related to cerebral palsy and is the leading cause in preterm infants.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prematurity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intraventricluar
hemorrhage
 
 
 
 
Periventricular
watershed zones
 
 
 
 
Immature autoregulatory
mechanisms
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ischemia/hypoxia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cytokines
 
 
 
 
Reactive
oxygen species
 
 
 
 
Exitotoxicity
by glutamate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Periventricular
leukomalacia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cerebral Palsy
 
 
 
 
 
 

Intraventricular hemorrhage

  • Intraventricular hemorrhage is defined as a condition in which bleeding from the subependymal matrix occurs into the ventricles of the brain.
  • Preterm infants are at increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage because of underdeveloped blood vessels.
  • The risk of cerebral palsy increases with the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.

Periventricular leukomalacia

Ischemia and infection are two important factors that play a vital role in the pathogenesis of periventricular leukomalacia.

Ischemia/hypoxia

Infection and inflammation

  • This process involves microglia (brain macrophage) cell activation and cytokine release, which causes damage to a specific cell type in the developing brain called the oligodendrocyte.
  • The oligodendrocytes are a type of supportive brain cell that wraps around neurons to form the myelin sheath, which is essential for white matter development.
  • Intrauterine infections activate the fetal immune system, which produces cytokines (e.g., interferon γ and TNF-α) that are toxic to premyelinating oligodendrocytes.
  • Infections also activate microglial cells, which release free radicals. Premyelinating oligodendrocytes have immature defences against reactive oxygen species (e.g., low production of glutathione, an important antioxidant).
  • IVH is hypothesized to cause PVL because iron-rich blood causes iron-mediated conversion of hydrogen peroxide to hydroxyl radical, contributing to oxidative damage.

Excitotoxicity

  • Excitotoxicity is a process where increased extracellular glutamate levels stimulate oligodendrocytes to increase calcium influx, which stimulates reactive oxidative species release.
  • Glutamate is increased because hypoxia causes white matter cells to reduce reuptake of glutamate due to lack of energy to operate glutamate pumps.
  • Glutamate is also released from microglial cells during the inflammatory response.

Inflammatory Response

Ischemic and hemorrhagic injuries results in:

Associated Conditions

Cerebral palsy is often accompanied by other disorders of cerebral function. Associated abnormalities may affect cognition, vision, hearing, language, cortical sensation, attention, vigilance, and behavior. Common conditions associated with cerebral palsy include:

References

  1. Nelson KB (2008). “Causative factors in cerebral palsy”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 51 (4): 749–62. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e318187087c. PMID 18981800.
  2. Koman LA, Smith BP, Shilt JS (2004). “Cerebral palsy”. Lancet. 363 (9421): 1619–31. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16207-7. PMID 15145637.
  3. Longo M, Hankins GD (2009). “Defining cerebral palsy: pathogenesis, pathophysiology and new intervention”. Minerva Ginecol. 61 (5): 421–9. PMID 19749673.
  4. Hankins GD, Speer M (2003). “Defining the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy”. Obstet Gynecol. 102 (3): 628–36. PMID 12962954.
  5. Marret S, Vanhulle C, Laquerriere A (2013). “Pathophysiology of cerebral palsy”. Handb Clin Neurol. 111: 169–76. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00016-6. PMID 23622161.
  6. Johnston MV, Hoon AH (2006). “Cerebral palsy”. Neuromolecular Med. 8 (4): 435–50. doi:10.1385/NMM:8:4:435. PMID 17028368.
  7. Boog G (2011). “[Cerebral palsy and perinatal asphyxia (II–Medicolegal implications and prevention)]”. Gynecol Obstet Fertil (in French). 39 (3): 146–73. doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.01.015. PMID 21354846.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Birth asphyxia is believed to be the principal etiology for cerebral palsy. However, recent studies demonstrated that 70% to 80% of cases of cerebral palsy are due to antenatal factors, while only 10% to 28% of cases are due to birth asphyxia in term and near-term infants. Causes of cerebral palsy are often multifactorial.

Causes

Birth asphyxia is believed to be the principal etiology for cerebral palsy. However, recent studies demonstrated that 70% to 80% of cases of cerebral palsy are due to antenatal factors, while only 10% to 28% of cases are due to birth asphyxia in term and near-term infants. Causes of cerebral palsy are often multifactorial. For example, an intrauterine infection may result in growth restriction, maternal fever, and prematurity, all of which have been associated with cerebral palsy.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Prenatal causes

Placental pathology

Perinatal causes

Postnatal causes

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cerebral palsy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Antenatal
 
 
 
 
Perinatal
 
 
 
 
Postnatal
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prematurity and low birth weight
Intrauterine infections
Multiple gestations
Pregnancy complications
 
 
 
 
Birth asphyxia
complicated labour and delivery
 
 
 
 
Head trauma
Meningitis
Cardio-pulmonary arrest

References

  1. Thorarensen O, Ryan S, Hunter J, Younkin DP (1997). “Factor V Leiden mutation: an unrecognized cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy, neonatal stroke, and placental thrombosis”. Ann. Neurol. 42 (3): 372–5. doi:10.1002/ana.410420316. PMID 9307261.
  2. Jacobsson B, Hagberg G (2004). “Antenatal risk factors for cerebral palsy”. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 18 (3): 425–36. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.011. PMID 15183137.
  3. Kuban KC, Leviton A (1994). “Cerebral palsy”. N. Engl. J. Med. 330 (3): 188–95. doi:10.1056/NEJM199401203300308. PMID 8264743.
  4. Nelson KB (2003). “Can we prevent cerebral palsy?”. N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (18): 1765–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb035364. PMID 14585946.
  5. Odding E, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ (2006). “The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors”. Disabil Rehabil. 28 (4): 183–91. doi:10.1080/09638280500158422. PMID 16467053.
  6. Ishii N, Kono Y, Yonemoto N, Kusuda S, Fujimura M (2013). “Outcomes of infants born at 22 and 23 weeks’ gestation”. Pediatrics. 132 (1): 62–71. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2857. PMID 23733804.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Cerebral Palsy from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iqra Qamar M.D.[2]

Overview

Cerebral palsy must be differentiated from other diseases that cause spasticity, hypotonia, ataxia, and dystonia such as inherited metabolic disorders, intellectual disability, metabolic myopathies, metabolic neuropathy, traumatic peripheral nerve lesions, tumors of the conus and cauda equina and vascular malformations of the spinal cord.

Differentiating Cerebral Palsy from other Diseases

Preferred Table

Diseases Type of motor abnormality Clinical findings Laboratory findings and diagnostic tests Radiographic findings
Spasticity Hypotonia Ataxia Dystonia
Leigh syndrome + +
Niemann-Pick disease type C + +
  • Abnormal liver function tests
  • Fibroblast cell culture with filipin staining
Infantile Refsum disease + + Elevated plasma VLCFA levels
Adrenoleukodystrophy +
  • Elevated plasma VLCFA levels
  • Molecular genetic testing for mutations in the ABCD1 gene
Zellweger syndrome +
Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency + + +
  • Elevated lactate and pyruvate levels in blood and CSF
  • Abnormal PDH enzymatic activity in cultured fibroblasts
Arginase deficiency +
Holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency + Elevated levels of:
  • Beta-hydroxyisovalerate
  • Beta-methylcrotonylglycine
  • Beta-hydroxypropionate
  • Methylcitrate
  • Tiglylglycine
Glutaric aciduria type 1 + Elevated levels of:
Ataxia telangiectasia +
Pontocerebellar hypoplasias + Genetic testing for PCH gene mutations
Metachromatic leukodystrophy + +
  • Deficient arylsulfatase A enzyme activity in leukocytes or cultured skin fibroblasts
Pelizaeus-Merzbacher + +
Angelman syndrome +
  • Methylation studies and chromosome microarray to detect chromosome 15 anomalies and UBE3A mutations
Rett syndrome + +
  • Occurs almost exclusively in females
  • Normal development during first six months followed by regression and loss of milestones
  • Loss of speech capability
  • Stereotypic hand movements
  • Seizures
  • Autistic features
  • Clinical diagnosis
  • Genetic testing for MECP2 mutations
Lesch-Nyhan syndrome + +
Miller-Dieker lissencephaly + +
  • Cytogenetic testing for 17p13.3 microdeletion
Dopa-responsive dystonia + +
  • Onset in early childhood
  • Symptoms worsen with fatigue and exercise
  • Positive response to a trial of levodopa

References

  1. Cooper J, Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B, Birnbaum R (1995). “The determination of sensory deficits in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy”. J. Child Neurol. 10 (4): 300–9. doi:10.1177/088307389501000412. PMID 7594266.
  2. Himmelmann K, Beckung E, Hagberg G, Uvebrant P (2006). “Gross and fine motor function and accompanying impairments in cerebral palsy”. Dev Med Child Neurol. 48 (6): 417–23. doi:10.1017/S0012162206000922. PMID 16700930.
  3. Odding E, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ (2006). “The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors”. Disabil Rehabil. 28 (4): 183–91. doi:10.1080/09638280500158422. PMID 16467053.
  4. Burns YR, O’Callaghan M, Tudehope DI (1989). “Early identification of cerebral palsy in high risk infants”. Aust Paediatr J. 25 (4): 215–9. PMID 2590117.
  5. Gupta R, Appleton RE (2001). “Cerebral palsy: not always what it seems”. Arch. Dis. Child. 85 (5): 356–60. PMC 1718969. PMID 11668092.

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

The incidence of cerebral palsy is approximately 150-250 per 100,000 live births worldwide. Decline in the trends of cerebral palsy is due to advances in perinatal care. The prevalence of different motor patterns of cerebral palsy has remained remarkably static over the last 20 years. Most patients are identified by 2 years of age due to delayed motor milestones. Cerebral palsy usually affects individuals of the black non-Hispanic children race. White non-Hispanic children are less likely to develop cerebral palsy. Males are more commonly affected by cerebral palsy than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.5 to 1.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence of cerebral palsy is approximately 150-250 per 100,000 live births worldwide.[1]
  • Decline in the trends of cerebral palsy is due to advances in perinatal care.
  • Patients with mild forms of cerebral palsy that do not result in severe functional impairment may remain undiagnosed, leading to underestimation of the true prevalence of cerebral palsy.

Prevelance

The prevalence of different motor patterns of cerebral palsy has remained remarkably static over the last 20 years.[2]

  • The prevalence of bilateral spastic cerebral palsy is approximately 120-150 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.
  • The prevalence of unilateral or hemiplegic cerebral palsy is approximately 60-80 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.
  • The prevalence of bilateral dystonic cerebral palsy is approximately 150-250 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.
Trends in birth prevalence of congenital Cerebral Palsy
Source:By American Academy of Pediatrics [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

Age

  • Cerebral palsy is more common in children who are born very prematurely.
  • Most patients are identified by 2 years of age due to delayed motor milestones.
Walking ability among 8 year old children with cerebral palsy
Source: By American Academy of Pediatrics [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

Race

  • Cerebral palsy usually affects individuals of the black non-Hispanic children race. White non-Hispanic children are less likely to develop cerebral palsy.

Gender

  • Males are more commonly affected by cerebral palsy than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.5 to 1.

References

  1. Odding E, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ (2006). “The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors”. Disabil Rehabil. 28 (4): 183–91. doi:10.1080/09638280500158422. PMID 16467053.
  2. “Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE)”. Dev Med Child Neurol. 42 (12): 816–24. 2000. PMID 11132255.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of cerebral palsy include prematurity, fetal birth asphyxia, multiple gestation, maternal illness, fetal brain malformation, maternal teratogen exposure, low socioeconomic status, nonvertex presentation, postmaturity, and head injury.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of cerebral palsy include prematurity, fetal birth asphyxia, and multiple births.[1][2]

Common Risk Factors

Less Common Risk Factors

References

  1. Koman LA, Smith BP, Shilt JS (2004). “Cerebral palsy”. Lancet. 363 (9421): 1619–31. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16207-7. PMID 15145637.
  2. Fairhurst C (2012). “Cerebral palsy: the whys and hows”. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 97 (4): 122–31. doi:10.1136/edpract-2011-300593. PMID 22868578.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.

Screening

  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy.
  • Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.[1]

References

  1. Upasani VV, Ketwaroo PD, Estroff JA, Warf BC, Emans JB, Glotzbecker MP (2016). “Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling”. World J Orthop. 7 (7): 406–17. doi:10.5312/wjo.v7.i7.406. PMC 4945507. PMID 27458551.

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Although the neurologic deficit is permanent and non-progressive, if cerebral palsy is left untreated it can have a dynamic effect on growth and development of the patient resulting in gait abnormalities. Cerebral palsy affects multiple systems. Common complications include contractures, hip dislocation, scoliosis, failure to thrive, dental caries (enamel dysgenesis, malocclusion, and gingival hyperplasia), increased risk of aspiration pneumonia, bronchiolitis/asthma, epilepsy, and mental retardation.

Natural History

Complications

Cerebral palsy affects multiple systems. Common complications include:[3][4][5]

Prognosis

  • Prognosis of cerebral palsy depends on the type and severity of motor impairment.[6]
  • Average life expectancy of patients with cerebral palsy is 44% of normal.
  • The strongest predictors of early mortality are immobility and impaired feeding ability.[7]
  • Retention of asymmetric and symmetric tonic neck reflex, moro reflex, neck righting reflex, and presence of lower-extremity extensor thrust response in early infancy are associated with poor prognostic factors for the development of independent walking
  • Long-term monitoring depends on the degree of involvement:[8][9]
    • Patients with a gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) level of I or II need less monitoring.
    • Patients with level III should be monitored every other year.
    • Patients with level IV or V need assessment every year during active growth.

References

  1. Ando N, Ueda S (2000). “Functional deterioration in adults with cerebral palsy”. Clin Rehabil. 14 (3): 300–6. doi:10.1191/026921500672826716. PMID 10868725.
  2. Bell KJ, Ounpuu S, DeLuca PA, Romness MJ (2002). “Natural progression of gait in children with cerebral palsy”. J Pediatr Orthop. 22 (5): 677–82. PMID 12198474.
  3. Peterson M (2015). “Physical inactivity and secondary health complications in cerebral palsy: chicken or egg?”. Dev Med Child Neurol. 57 (2): 114–5. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12578. PMC 4863451. PMID 25195946.
  4. Foster T, Rai AI, Weller RA, Dixon TA, Weller EB (2010). “Psychiatric complications in cerebral palsy”. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 12 (2): 116–21. doi:10.1007/s11920-010-0096-8. PMID 20425296.
  5. Mello SS, Marques RS, Saraiva RA (2007). “[Respiratory complications in patients with cerebral palsy undergoing general anesthesia.]”. Rev Bras Anestesiol (in Portuguese). 57 (5): 455–64. PMID 19462122.
  6. O’Shea TM (2008). “Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cerebral palsy”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 51 (4): 816–28. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181870ba7. PMC 3051278. PMID 18981805.
  7. Bleck EE (1975). “Locomotor prognosis in cerebral palsy”. Dev Med Child Neurol. 17 (1): 18–25. PMID 1123119.
  8. Strauss D, Brooks J, Rosenbloom L, Shavelle R (2008). “Life expectancy in cerebral palsy: an update”. Dev Med Child Neurol. 50 (7): 487–93. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03000.x. PMID 18611196.
  9. Liptak GS (2008). “Health and well being of adults with cerebral palsy”. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21 (2): 136–42. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f6a499. PMID 18317270.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Electrocardiogram | Laboratory Findings | X-Ray Findings | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT-Scan Findings | MRI Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Other Imaging Findings

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH