Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Galactosemia

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Classic galactosemia, galactokinase deficiency

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactosemia is a genetic metabolic disorder which affects an individual’s ability to properly metabolize galactose. In individuals with galactosemia, the enzymes needed for further metabolism of galactose are dysfunctional or entirely absent, leading to toxic levels of galactose and phosphorylated intermediates to build up in the blood, resulting inliver and kidney failure, cataract, and brain damage.

Historical Perspective

The first case of galactosemia was reported in 1908. The disease was fully described in 1935 by Mason and Turner followed by elucidation of the gene in 1956. Since then, screening tests for galactosemia have been widely used.

Classification

Galactosemia consists of four types of disorders resulting from abnormal activity of the enzymes involved in galactose metabolism. Type I/ Classical is the most serious form of the disease.

Galactose is an important metabolite of the human body both for neonatal and adult health, playing a vital role in systemic and cognitive development .Abnormalities in any of the enzymes involved in any of the steps of the Leloir pathway can give rise to the pathological condition called galactosemia.

Causes

Galactosemia is an autosomal recessive disorder which is caused by dysfunction of the enzymes involved in the Leloir pathway of galactose metabolism.

Differentiating Galactosemia from other Diseases

Galactosemia closely resembles other metabolic disorders which form important differential diagnoses in clinical practice.

Galactosemia is quite widespread among different countries of the world with significant demographic differences with race and ethnicity. In spite of that, typical symptoms and clinical signs are manifested in most of the patients.

Galactosemia satisfies the criteria for newborn screening successfully. Since most babies are born apparently healthy, there is a considerable window for prompt detection of the disease and appropriate intervention.

Risk Factors

The major risk factor for galactosemia is the presence of the defective gene(s).

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Galactosemia is an inherited metabolic disorder with a variable natural history. It can lead to severe systemic complications if neglected. The prognosis depends on various factors.

History and Symptoms

Galactosemia is primarily seen in the neonatal period with a wide range of symptoms.

Physical Examination

Galactosemia gives rise to varied signs on clinical examination.

Laboratory Findings

Galactosemia can be confirmed by a panel of laboratory investigations which provide both direct and indirect evidence of the disease by detecting abnormalities in blood, urine and/or other body tissues.

There are no significant electrocardiographic findings in galactosemia.

Chest Xray is normal in galactosemia.

CT Scan of the brain is useful in galactosemia.

MRI findings of galactosemic patients indicate abnormal myelination secondary to the inability to produce sufficient and/or normal galactocerebroside due to defective enzyme activity.

Echocardiography is not useful in the diagnosis of galactosemia. On the other hand, ultrasonography provides useful information.

Other Imaging Findings

Additional imaging with diffusion weighted MRI and radionuclides also aid in the diagnosis of galactosemia.

Other Diagnostic Studies

In addition to the commonly performed laboratory tests, histopathology and genetics also aid in confirmation of galactosemia.

Treatment

Medical therapy is of limited importance in galactosemia.

Surgicaltreatment is rarely indicated for management of galactosemia.

Preventive strategies of galactosemia are primarily aimed at early detection through screening and prompt intervention.

Secondary prevention of galactosemia consists of newborn screening and dietary modifications.

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

The cost-effectiveness of the therapy of galactosemia has primarily been studied with respect to the screening program for the disease and the benefits reaped from it.

A number of therapeutic modalities are currently being explored.

Case Studies

Case #1

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

The first case of galactosemia was reported in 1908. The disease was fully described in 1935 by Mason and Turner followed by elucidation of the gene in 1956. Since then, screening tests for galactosemia have been widely used.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

  • Galactosemia was first discovered by Von Ruess in 1908 on a breast- fed infant with failure to thrive, hepatosplenomegaly and galactosuria (increased galactose excretion in urine). The galactosuria stopped after elimination of dietary milk products but the infant ultimately succumbed to death. Autopsy showed liver cirrhosis, but the confirmation of the cause was not possible. It has been generally accepted that this was the first report of galactosemia.
  • The first detailed report was given by Friedrich Goppert in 1917. [1]

Landmark events and development strategies

  • The disease was first recognized in detail in 1935 by Mason and Turner. [2]
  • The defective gene (GALT) was found in 1988 after identification of the gene in 1956. [3]
  • In 1963, it was first detected in a newborn using a screening method developed by Guthrie and Paigen. This was the second disorder detected by this method.[1]
  • Increased newborn screening is a significant development for the galactosemic community.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Timson DJ (2016). “The molecular basis of galactosemia – Past, present and future”. Gene. 589 (2): 133–41. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.077. PMID 26143117.
  2. Coelho AI, Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Vicente JB, Rivera I (2017). “Sweet and sour: an update on classic galactosemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 40 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1007/s10545-017-0029-3. PMC 5391384. PMID 28281081.
  3. Reichardt JK, Berg P (1988). “Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding human galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase”. Mol Biol Med. 5 (2): 107–22. PMID 2840550.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dayana Davidis, M.D. [2]

Overview

Galactosemia consists of four types of disorders resulting from abnormal activity of the enzymes involved in galactose metabolism. Type I/ Classical is the most serious form of the disease.

Types

Galactosemia refers to a group of autosomal recessive disorders of galactose metabolism. They are classified into the following types based on the enzymatic activity [1]

Type I/Classical

  • Defects in both copies of the gene that codes for the enzyme galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase or GALT.[2].
  • Most common and severe form.
    • Duarte galactosemia
      • Variant of classic galactosemia.
      • Galactose metabolised to some extent as GALT not completely absent
      • Less severe symptoms than other forms

Type II

  • Defect in both copies of the gene that codes for the enzyme galactokinase or GALK.[3]
  • Less common and harmful than classic galactosemia.
  • Does not generally lead to hepatomegaly or brain damage.

Type III

  • Alterations in the gene coding for epimerase enzyme.[4] This is the mildest type.

Type IV

  • This type has only been discovered recently.
  • Abnormal changes in the galactose mutatrose enzyme, encoded by the GALM gene, have been proven to cause the disorder. [5]

References

  1. Banford S, McCorvie TJ, Pey AL, Timson DJ (2021). “Galactosemia: Towards Pharmacological Chaperones”. J Pers Med. 11 (2). doi:10.3390/jpm11020106. PMC 7914515 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 33562227 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. Coelho AI, Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Vicente JB, Rivera I (2017). “Sweet and sour: an update on classic galactosemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 40 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1007/s10545-017-0029-3. PMC 5391384. PMID 28281081.
  3. Holden HM, Thoden JB, Timson DJ, Reece RJ (2004). “Galactokinase: structure, function and role in type II galactosemia”. Cell Mol Life Sci. 61 (19–20): 2471–84. doi:10.1007/s00018-004-4160-6. PMID 15526155.
  4. Timson DJ (2006). “The structural and molecular biology of type III galactosemia”. IUBMB Life. 58 (2): 83–9. doi:10.1080/15216540600644846. PMID 16611573.
  5. Banford S, Timson DJ (2021). “The structural and molecular biology of type IV galactosemia”. Biochimie. 183: 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2020.11.001. PMID 33181226 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactose is an important metabolite of the human body both for neonatal and adult health, playing a vital role in systemic and cognitive development .Abnormalities in any of the enzymes involved in each of the steps of the Leloir pathway can give rise to the pathological condition called galactosemia.

Pathophysiology

Physiology

Galactose is metabolised in the body through the Leloir pathway. [2]

Pathology

Abnormalities in any of the enzymes involved in each of the steps of the Leloir pathway can give rise to the pathological condition called galactosemia.

References

  1. Coelho AI, Berry GT, Rubio-Gozalbo ME (2015). “Galactose metabolism and health”. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 18 (4): 422–7. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000189. PMID 26001656.
  2. Holden HM, Rayment I, Thoden JB (2003). “Structure and function of enzymes of the Leloir pathway for galactose metabolism”. J Biol Chem. 278 (45): 43885–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.R300025200. PMID 12923184.
  3. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). “Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes”. Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2326-4594-jiems-2021-002 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. Gitzelmann R (1995). “Galactose-1-phosphate in the pathophysiology of galactosemia”. Eur J Pediatr. 154 (7 Suppl 2): S45–9. doi:10.1007/BF02143803. PMID 7671964.
  5. Lai K, Langley SD, Khwaja FW, Schmitt EW, Elsas LJ (2003). “GALT deficiency causes UDP-hexose deficit in human galactosemic cells”. Glycobiology. 13 (4): 285–94. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwg033. PMID 12626383.
  6. Coss KP, Treacy EP, Cotter EJ, Knerr I, Murray DW, Shin YS; et al. (2014). “Systemic gene dysregulation in classical Galactosaemia: Is there a central mechanism?”. Mol Genet Metab. 113 (3): 177–87. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.08.004. PMID 25174965.
  7. Fekete E, Karaffa L, Sándor E, Bányai I, Seiboth B, Gyémánt G; et al. (2004). “The alternative D-galactose degrading pathway of Aspergillus nidulans proceeds via L-sorbose”. Arch Microbiol. 181 (1): 35–44. doi:10.1007/s00203-003-0622-8. PMID 14624333.
  8. “StatPearls”. 2022. PMID 32809518 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Openo KK, Schulz JM, Vargas CA, Orton CS, Epstein MP, Schnur RE; et al. (2006). “Epimerase-deficiency galactosemia is not a binary condition”. Am J Hum Genet. 78 (1): 89–102. doi:10.1086/498985. PMC 1380226. PMID 16385452.
  10. Yazici H, Canda E, Altınok YA, Ucar SK, Coker M (2022). “Two siblings with galactose mutarotase deficiency: Clinical differences”. JIMD Rep. 63 (1): 25–28. doi:10.1002/jmd2.12263. PMC 8743342 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 35028268 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactosemia is an autosomal recessive disorder which is caused by dysfunction of the enzymes] involved in the Leloir pathway of galactose metabolism.

Causes

Galactosemia is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner when one faulty gene is acquired from each of the carrier parents. The mutations responsible are as follows [1]:

Type I/ Classical galactosemia

Impaired functioning of the GALT gene, leading to absence of the galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase enzyme [2].

Duarte variant

GALT gene dysfunction causes reduction of enzyme activity to 50 % [2]

Type II galactosemia

Abnormality in the GALK1 gene [3]

Type III galactosemia

Variation in the activity of the GALE gene [4]

Type IV galactosemia

Biallelic mutations in the GALM gene [5]

References

  1. Demirbas D, Coelho AI, Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Berry GT (2018). “Hereditary galactosemia”. Metabolism. 83: 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2018.01.025. PMID 29409891.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Elsas LJ, Lai K (1998). “The molecular biology of galactosemia”. Genet Med. 1 (1): 40–8. doi:10.1097/00125817-199811000-00009. PMID 11261429.
  3. “StatPearls”. 2022. PMID 32809518 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW; et al. (1993). “GeneReviews®”. PMID 21290786.
  5. Iwasawa S, Kikuchi A, Wada Y, Arai-Ichinoi N, Sakamoto O, Tamiya G; et al. (2019). “The prevalence of GALM mutations that cause galactosemia: A database of functionally evaluated variants”. Mol Genet Metab. 126 (4): 362–367. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.01.018. PMID 30910422.

Template:Metabolic pathology

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Galactosemia from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactosemia closely resembles other metabolic disorders which form important differential diagnoses in clinical practice.

Differentiating Galactosemia from other Diseases

Galactosemia needs to differentiated from other diseases like:

References

  1. Sakura N, Mizoguchi N, Ono H, Yamaoka H, Hamakawa M (2000). “Congenital biliary atresia detected as a result of galactosemia screening by the Beutler method”. Clin Chim Acta. 298 (1–2): 175–9. doi:10.1016/s0009-8981(00)00220-5. PMID 10876013.
  2. Müller D, Santer R, Krawinkel M, Christiansen B, Schaub J (1997). “Fanconi-Bickel syndrome presenting in neonatal screening for galactosaemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 20 (4): 607–8. doi:10.1023/a:1005375629820. PMID 9266402.
  3. Stuhrman G, Perez Juanazo SJ, Crivelly K, Smith J, Andersson H, Morava E (2017). “False-Positive Newborn Screen Using the Beutler Spot Assay for Galactosemia in Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency”. JIMD Rep. 36: 1–5. doi:10.1007/8904_2016_34. PMC 5680284. PMID 28078493.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Karadag N, Zenciroglu A, Eminoglu FT, Dilli D, Karagol BS, Kundak A; et al. (2013). “Literature review and outcome of classic galactosemia diagnosed in the neonatal period”. Clin Lab. 59 (9–10): 1139–46. doi:10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121235. PMID 24273939.
  5. Senemar S, Ganjekarimi A, Senemar S, Tarami B, Bazrgar M (2011). “The prevalence and clinical study of galactosemia disease in a pilot screening program of neonates, southern iran”. Iran J Public Health. 40 (4): 99–104. PMC 3481732. PMID 23113108.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Bezerra JA, Wells RG, Mack CL, Karpen SJ, Hoofnagle JH, Doo E; et al. (2018). “Biliary Atresia: Clinical and Research Challenges for the Twenty-First Century”. Hepatology. 68 (3): 1163–1173. doi:10.1002/hep.29905. PMC 6167205. PMID 29604222.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Feldman AG, Mack CL (2015). =ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25658057 “Biliary Atresia: Clinical Lessons Learned” Check |url= value (help). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 61 (2): 167–75. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000755. PMID 25658057.
  8. Santer R, Steinmann B, Schaub J (2002). “Fanconi-Bickel syndrome–a congenital defect of facilitative glucose transport”. Curr Mol Med. 2 (2): 213–27. doi:10.2174/1566524024605743. PMID 11949937.
  9. Pena L, Charrow J (2011). “Fanconi-Bickel syndrome: report of life history and successful pregnancy in an affected patient”. Am J Med Genet A. 155A (2): 415–7. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33822. PMID 21271664.
  10. Santer R, Schneppenheim R, Dombrowski A, Götze H, Steinmann B, Schaub J (1997). “Mutations in GLUT2, the gene for the liver-type glucose transporter, in patients with Fanconi-Bickel syndrome”. Nat Genet. 17 (3): 324–6. doi:10.1038/ng1197-324. PMID 9354798.
  11. Sakamoto O, Jagadeesh S, Nampoothiri S (2012). “Fanconi-Bickel syndrome”. Indian J Pediatr. 79 (1): 112–4. doi:10.1007/s12098-011-0373-5. PMID 21327337.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Luzzatto L, Nannelli C, Notaro R (2016). “Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency”. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 30 (2): 373–93. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2015.11.006. PMID 27040960.
  13. Beutler E, Mitchell M (1968). “Special modifications of the fluorescent screening method for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency”. Blood. 32 (5): 816–8. PMID 4386875.
  14. de Gurrola GC, Araúz JJ, Durán E, Aguilar-Medina M, Ramos-Payán R, García-Magallanes N; et al. (2008). “Kernicterus by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a case report and review of the literature”. J Med Case Rep. 2: 146. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-2-146. PMC 2391151. PMID 18460213.
  15. Singh B, Kaur P, Chan KH, Lahita RG, Maroules M, Chandran C (2020). “Severe Rhabdomyolysis in Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency”. Am J Med Sci. 360 (1): 72–74. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.018. PMID 32448501 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WH Template:WS

Differential diagnosis of galactosemia
Diseases Clinical manifestations Para-clinical findings Gold standard Additional findings
Galactosemia Hepatomegaly, jaundice, vomiting, cataract, sepsis, psychomotor retardation [4] Direct and indirect hyperbilirubinemia [4] Measurement of GALT/GALK/Epimerase activity in erthrocytes [5] Hemophagocytosis, purpura fulminans [4]
Biliary atresia Persistent jaundice, dark urine, clay-colored stools, hepatomegaly [6] Elevated total and direct bilirubin, ALT, AST, GGT [7] Atretic biliary tree on liver biopsy [6] Ascites, splenomegaly [7]
Fanconi Bickel syndrome Hepatomegaly, glucose and galactose intolerance, severe growth retardation [8] Hyperlipidemia, tubular nephropathy [9] Mutation analysis of SLC2A2 gene encoding GLUT2 transporter [10] Genu varum, hypophosphatemic rickets, Fanconi syndrome [11]
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency Severe neonatal jaundice [12] Acute hemolytic anemia after certain infections, intake of some drugs or fava beans [12] Fluorescent spot test [13] Kernicterus [14], rhabdomyolysis [15]
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactosemia is quite widespread among different countries of the world with significant demographic differences with race and ethnicity. In spite of that, typical symptoms and clinical signs are manifested in most of the patients.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Epidemiology

  • Classic galactosemia affects approximately 1/50,000 live births in the USA. [1]. It is around 1 in 47000 among the White Americans. [2].1% of the North American people are carriers. [3]
  • Incidence in UK is 1 in 70000, in Ireland 1 in 23000. [2]
  • Incidence in the traveller community is notably high as 1 in 480. [2]
  • In western Europe the percentage of galactosemia ranges from 1: 23000 to 1: 44000. [4]

Demographics

  • The incidence seems to be rather lower among people of African and Asian descent.[3]
  • The disorder is apparently less prevalent among Asians. Galactosemia is seen in all races; however, its variants are classified genetically, being most notable among African–Americans.[5]
  • Symptoms mostly develop in a few days to two weeks after initiating feeding in an apparently normal infant leading often to discharge from the hospital prior to the onset of the illness.
  • The other important clinical finding in these patients is cataract.[6]
  • Cognitive impairment is present in the majority of patients.[7]

References

  1. Pyhtila BM, Shaw KA, Neumann SE, Fridovich-Keil JL (2015). “Newborn screening for galactosemia in the United States: looking back, looking around, and looking ahead”. JIMD Rep. 15: 79–93. doi:10.1007/8904_2014_302. PMC 4413015. PMID 24718839.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Suzuki M, West C, Beutler E (2001). “Large-scale molecular screening for galactosemia alleles in a pan-ethnic population”. Hum Genet. 109 (2): 210–5. doi:10.1007/s004390100552. PMID 11511927.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Ruiz M, Jover S, Armas M, Duque MR, Santana C, Girós ML; et al. (1999). “Galactosaemia presenting as congenital pseudoafibrinogenaemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 22 (8): 943–4. doi:10.1023/a:1005660011709. PMID 10604151.
  4. Bosch AM, Bakker HD, van Gennip AH, van Kempen JV, Wanders RJ, Wijburg FA (2002). “Clinical features of galactokinase deficiency: a review of the literature”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 25 (8): 629–34. doi:10.1023/a:1022875629436. PMID 12705493.
  5. Senemar S, Ganjekarimi A, Senemar S, Tarami B, Bazrgar M (2011). “The prevalence and clinical study of galactosemia disease in a pilot screening program of neonates, southern iran”. Iran J Public Health. 40 (4): 99–104. PMC 3481732. PMID 23113108.
  6. Kaye CI, Committee on Genetics. Accurso F, La Franchi S, Lane PA, Hope N; et al. (2006). “Newborn screening fact sheets”. Pediatrics. 118 (3): e934–63. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1783. PMID 16950973.
  7. Schadewaldt P, Hoffmann B, Hammen HW, Kamp G, Schweitzer-Krantz S, Wendel U (2010). “Longitudinal assessment of intellectual achievement in patients with classical galactosemia”. Pediatrics. 125 (2): e374–81. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3325. PMID 20100763.
Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujaya Chattopadhyay, M.D.[2]

Overview

Galactosemia satisfies the criteria for newborn screening successfully. Since most babies are born apparently healthy, there is a considerable window for prompt detection of the disease and appropriate intervention.

Galactosemia despite being incurable, qualifies for screening as early detection can prevent complications. [1] . Neonatal blood samples should be collected within 48 hours of birth, reach the laboratory within another 24 hours for the most accurate results.

Tests used to screen for galactosemia

Thus, screening for galactosemia is primarily based on estimation of galactose, galactose-1-phosphate and GALT in RBCs. Elevated galactose with absent GALT activity indicates classic galactosemia, some GALT activity points towards Duarte variant, while raised sugar with normal GALT suggests deficiency of galactokinase or epimerase.

References

  1. Kotb MA, Mansour L, William Shaker Basanti C, El Garf W, Ali GIZ, Mostafa El Sorogy ST; et al. (2018). “Pilot study of classic galactosemia: Neurodevelopmental impact and other complications urge neonatal screening in Egypt”. J Adv Res. 12: 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2018.02.001. PMC 6054589. PMID 30038819.
  2. Adam BW, Flores SR, Hou Y, Allen TW, De Jesus VR (2015). “Galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase dried blood spot quality control materials for newborn screening tests”. Clin Biochem. 48 (6): 437–42. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.12.009. PMC 4547523. PMID 25528144.
  3. HAWORTH JC, MACDONALD MS (1957). “Reducing sugars in the urine and blood of premature babies”. Arch Dis Child. 32 (165): 417–21. doi:10.1136/adc.32.165.417. PMC 2012154. PMID 13479147.
  4. Haque SK, Ariceta G, Batlle D (2012). “Proximal renal tubular acidosis: a not so rare disorder of multiple etiologies”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 27 (12): 4273–87. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs493. PMC 3616759. PMID 23235953.
  5. Resendez A, Panescu P, Zuniga R, Banda I, Joseph J, Webb DL; et al. (2016). “Multiwell Assay for the Analysis of Sugar Gut Permeability Markers: Discrimination of Sugar Alcohols with a Fluorescent Probe Array Based on Boronic Acid Appended Viologens”. Anal Chem. 88 (10): 5444–52. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00880. PMC 5747966. PMID 27116118.
  6. Jakobs C, Kleijer WJ, Allen J, Holton JB (1995). “Prenatal diagnosis of galactosemia”. Eur J Pediatr. 154 (7 Suppl 2): S33–6. doi:10.1007/BF02143800. PMID 7671961.
  7. Christopher R, Sankaran BP (2008). “An insight into the biochemistry of inborn errors of metabolism for a clinical neurologist”. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 11 (2): 68–81. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.41873. PMC 2771954. PMID 19893643.
  8. Pasquali M, Yu C, Coffee B (2018). “Laboratory diagnosis of galactosemia: a technical standard and guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)”. Genet Med. 20 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1038/gim.2017.172. PMID 29261178.
  9. Rajabi F (2018). “Updates in Newborn Screening”. Pediatr Ann. 47 (5): e187–e190. doi:10.3928/19382359-20180426-01. PMID 29750285.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk factors

Overview

The major risk factor for galactosemia is the presence of the defective gene(s).

Risk factors

Galactosemia is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder of galactose metabolism. Two defective alleles are necessary to manifest the condition.[1]

References

  1. Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW; et al. (1993). “GeneReviews®”. PMID 20301691.
  2. Boonyawat B, Kamolsilp M, Phavichitr N (2005). “Galactosemia in Thai patient at Phramongkutklao Hospital: a case report”. J Med Assoc Thai. 88 Suppl 3: S275–80. PMID 16858969.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dayana Davidis, M.D. [2]

Overview

Galactosemia is an inherited metabolic disorder with a variable natural history. It can lead to severe systemic complications if neglected. The prognosis depends on various factors.

Natural History

Acute neonatal illness is experienced by most patients. A reported lower enzyme activity leads to more severe presentation while newborn screening results in detection at more favorable stages of the disease. Clinical features include [1] having one or more of:

A younger age of diagnosis and early introduction of dietary changes exert a positive effect on the natural history of galactosemia [2] [3].

Complications

Despite dietary modifications, most of the galactosemic patients develop neurological and/or gonadal complications and are at risk of bone damage [1].

Neurological , cognitive and behavioral complications [4]:

  • Tremor: Most often seen in the second decade of life [1]
  • General motor abnormality ataxia
  • Seizures
  • Dystonia
  • Anxiety disorder: It is the most frequently reported mental problem and common in all age categories, usually after the second decade.
  • ADHD, ASD: More likely before the second decade

Gonadal complications

Bone complications

Reduced bone mineral density [8]

Prognosis

The prognostic outcome of galactosemia depends on a number of factors [1]:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Haskovic M, Bosch AM, Burnyte B, Coelho AI, Cassiman D; et al. (2019). “The natural history of classic galactosemia: lessons from the GalNet registry”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 14 (1): 86. doi:10.1186/s13023-019-1047-z. PMC 6486996. PMID 31029175.
  2. Berry GT, Nissim I, Gibson JB, Mazur AT, Lin Z, Elsas LJ; et al. (1997). “Quantitative assessment of whole body galactose metabolism in galactosemic patients”. Eur J Pediatr. 156 Suppl 1: S43–9. doi:10.1007/pl00014271. PMID 9266215.
  3. Berry GT (2012). “Galactosemia: when is it a newborn screening emergency?”. Mol Genet Metab. 106 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.03.007. PMID 22483615.
  4. Rubio-Agusti I, Carecchio M, Bhatia KP, Kojovic M, Parees I, Chandrashekar HS; et al. (2013). “Movement disorders in adult patients with classical galactosemia”. Mov Disord. 28 (6): 804–10. doi:10.1002/mds.25348. PMID 23400815.
  5. Frederick AB, Zinsli AM, Carlock G, Conneely K, Fridovich-Keil JL (2018). “Presentation, progression, and predictors of ovarian insufficiency in classic galactosemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 41 (5): 785–790. doi:10.1007/s10545-018-0177-0. PMC 6128750. PMID 29721917.
  6. Gubbels CS, Welt CK, Dumoulin JC, Robben SG, Gordon CM, Dunselman GA; et al. (2013). “The male reproductive system in classic galactosemia: cryptorchidism and low semen volume”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 36 (5): 779–86. doi:10.1007/s10545-012-9539-1. PMID 23053469.
  7. Gubbels CS, Maurice-Stam H, Berry GT, Bosch AM, Waisbren S, Rubio-Gozalbo ME; et al. (2011). “Psychosocial developmental milestones in men with classic galactosemia”. J Inherit Metab Dis. 34 (2): 415–9. doi:10.1007/s10545-011-9290-z. PMC 3112026. PMID 21350966.
  8. van Erven B, Welling L, van Calcar SC, Doulgeraki A, Eyskens F, Gribben J; et al. (2017). “Bone Health in Classic Galactosemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. JIMD Rep. 35: 87–96. doi:10.1007/8904_2016_28. PMC 5585100. PMID 27995581.
  9. Van Calcar SC, Bernstein LE, Rohr FJ, Scaman CH, Yannicelli S, Berry GT (2014). “A re-evaluation of life-long severe galactose restriction for the nutrition management of classic galactosemia”. Mol Genet Metab. 112 (3): 191–7. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.04.004. PMID 24857409.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings |Electrocardiography| Chest XRay| CT Scan| MRI|Echocardiography and Ultrasound| Other Imaging| Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:Metabolic pathology

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH