Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Glomus tumor


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jesus Rosario Hernandez, M.D. [2]Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Barré-Masson syndrome; Glomangioma; Tumors of popoff; Solitary glomus tumor; Solid glomus tumor

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2] Roukoz A. Karam, M.D.[3]

Overview

Glomus body was first discovered by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal. However, Glomus tumor was first correctly described in 1924 by Barre and Masson. Glomus tumor arises from modified smooth muscle cells (or pericytes) of the glomus body (previously called as glomus cells). Glomus tumors may be classified into solitary and multiple variants. On gross pathology, they are small (usually less than 1 cm), bluish or whitish, well circumscribed, solitary nodules are characteristic findings of glomus tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, branching vascular channels and aggregates of specialized glomus cells are characteristic findings of glomus tumor. Multiple glomus tumors are caused by a mutation in the GLMN (glomulin) gene. Solitary glomus tumors must be differentiated from other diseases that cause pain such as leiomyoma and eccrine spiradenoma. Multiple glomus tumors must be differentiated from other diseases such as cavernous hemangioma and blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome. Solitary glomus tumors commonly affect young to middle aged individuals. Multiple glomus tumors commonly affect children. Females are more commonly affected with solitary glomus tumors (particularly subungual lesions) than males. Males are more commonly affected with multiple glomus tumors than females. Common risk factors in the development of glomus tumors are age and gender. If left untreated, patients with glomus tumors may progress to develop pain and nail discoloration. Common complication of the glomus tumor includes malignant change in multiple tumors. Common complications of glomus tumors post operatively include nail deformities and recurrence. Findings on x rays suggestive of glomus tumor may include a marginated bone erosion or thinning of the adjacent cortical bone. MRI and ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of glomus tumors. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for glomus tumor. Prognosis is generally excellent for solitary glomus tumors and malignant glomus tumors treated with wide excision. However, the prognosis is poor for malignant glomus tumors with widespread metastases.

Historical Perspective

Glomus body was first discovered by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal. However, Glomus tumor was first correctly described in 1924 by Barre and Masson.

Classification

Glomus tumors may be classified into solitary and multiple variants.

Pathophysiology

Glomus tumor arises from modified smooth muscle cells (or pericytes) of the glomus body (previously called as glomus cells). The glomus body is a neuromyoarterial plexus in the dermis of skin that is normally involved in thermoregulation. The gene involved in the pathogenesis of familial glomangioma is the glomulin (GLMN) gene. On gross pathology, small (usually less than 1 cm), bluish or whitish, well circumscribed, solitary nodules are characteristic findings of glomus tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, branching vascular channels and aggregates of specialised glomus cells are characteristic findings of glomus tumor.

Causes

The cause of solitary glomus tumors has not been identified. Multiple glomus tumors are caused by a mutation in the GLMN (glomulin) gene.

Differentiating Glomus Tumor from other Diseases

Solitary glomus tumors must be differentiated from other diseases that cause pain such as leiomyoma and eccrine spiradenoma. Multiple glomus tumors must be differentiated from other diseases such as cavernous hemangioma and blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The exact incidence of glomus tumors is unknown. Females are more commonly affected with solitary glomus tumors (particularly subungual lesions) than males, while multiple lesions are slightly more common in males. Solitary glomus tumors can occur at any age; however, multiple glomus tumors commonly affect children.

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for glomus tumor; however, an epidemiologic relationship may exist between glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis.

Screening

Screening for multiple glomus tumors by genetic testing is recommended among individuals with a family history of glomangiomas (autosomal dominant inheritance).

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, patients with glomus tumors may progress to develop pain and nail discoloration. Common complication of the glomus tumor includes malignant change in multiple tumors. Common complications of glomus tumors post operatively include nail deformities and recurrence. Prognosis is generally excellent for solitary glomus tumors and malignant glomus tumors treated with wide excision. However, the prognosis is poor for malignant glomus tumors with widespread metastases.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

There is no single diagnostic study of choice for the diagnosis of glomus tumor, but glomus tumors can be diagnosed based on MRI of the finger in addition to history and physical examination.

History and Symptoms

A detailed history from the patient may be helpful. A positive history of trauma may be present. A positive family history may be present in patients with multiple glomus tumors (autosomal dominant). Symptoms of glomus tumor include hypersensitivity to cold and paroxysmal pain at a well defined site.

Physical examination

Patients with glomus tumor usually appear well. Physical examination of patients with glomus tumor is usually remarkable for small (usually less than 2cm), blue or red palpable nodules which are usually distributed in the acral regions (subungual most common) and nail deformities.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with glomus tumor.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with glomus tumor.

X Ray

X rays may be helpful in the diagnosis of glomus tumor. Findings on x rays suggestive of glomus tumor may include a marginated bone erosion or thinning of the adjacent cortical bone.

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the preoperative diagnosis of glomus tumor; it provides the localization, size, and shape of tumors as small as 3 mm. Findings on an ultrasound suggestive of glomus tumor include a well-circumscribed hypoechoic mass.

CT Scan

There are no CT findings associated with glomus tumors.

MRI

An MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of glomus tumor. Findings on MRI suggestive of glomus tumor include slightly hypointense or hyperintense T1 images and hyperintense T2 images.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with glomus tumor.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for glomus tumor include immunohistochemistry staining, which demonstrates glomus cells positive for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin and negative for desmin.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The predominant therapy for solitary glomus tumor is surgical resection. Patients with multiple glomus tumors are treated with sclerotherapy or laser therapy.

Surgery

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for glomus tumor.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Roukoz A. Karam, M.D.[2]

Overview

Glomus body was first discovered by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal. However, Glomus tumor was first correctly described in 1924 by Barre and Masson.

Historical Perspective

Glomus tumor was first described by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal.[1][2]

  • However, Wood described it as a small, bluish, benign, subcutaneous nodule associated with severe paroxysmal pain and tenderness.
    • He called this lesion a “painful subcutaneous tubercle.”
  • In 1878, Kolaczek described the subungual location of a painful tubercle, which he believed to be a variant of angiosarcoma.
  • Glomus tumor was first correctly described by Barre and Masson in 1924.[1][2]
    • They correctly interpreted the pathologic anatomy of the painful tubercle.
    • Barre and Masson called it a glomus tumor because of its relationship to the normal neuromyoarterial glomus.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Garman ME, Orengo IF, Netscher D, Schwartz MR, Rosen T (2003). “On glomus tumors, warts, and razors”. Dermatol Surg. 29 (2): 192–4. PMID 12562354.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tomak Y, Akcay I, Dabak N, Eroglu L (2003). “Subungual glomus tumours of the hand: diagnosis and treatment of 14 cases”. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 37 (2): 121–4. PMID 12755514.
Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

Glomus tumors may be classified into solitary and multiple variants.

Classification

Glomus tumors may be classified into the following:[1]

  • Solitary glomus tumors
  • Multiple glomus tumors

Histopathological classification

Glomus tumors may be classified according to histopathology into the following subtypes:[4][5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Rudolph R (1993). “Familial multiple glomangiomas”. Ann Plast Surg. 30 (2): 183–5. PMID 8387739.
  2. Parsons ME, Russo G, Fucich L, Millikan LE, Kim R (1997). “Multiple glomus tumors”. Int J Dermatol. 36 (12): 894–900. PMID 9466193.
  3. Yang JS, Ko JW, Suh KS, Kim ST (1999). “Congenital multiple plaque-like glomangiomyoma”. Am J Dermatopathol. 21 (5): 454–7. PMID 10535575.
  4. Gombos Z, Zhang PJ (2008). “Glomus tumor”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 132 (9): 1448–52. doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1448:GT]2.0.CO;2. PMID 18788860.
  5. Calduch L, Monteagudo C, Martínez-Ruiz E, Ramón D, Pinazo I, Cardá C; et al. (2002). “Familial generalized multiple glomangiomyoma: report of a new family, with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies and review of the literature”. Pediatr Dermatol. 19 (5): 402–8. PMID 12383095.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

Glomus tumor arises from modified smooth muscle cells (or pericytes) of the glomus body (previously called as glomus cells). The glomus body is a neuromyoarterial plexus in the dermis of skin that is normally involved in thermoregulation. The gene involved in the pathogenesis of familial glomangioma is the glomulin (GLMN) gene. On gross pathology, small (usually less than 1 cm), bluish or whitish, well circumscribed, solitary nodules are characteristic findings of glomus tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, branching vascular channels and aggregates of specialized glomus cells are characteristic findings of glomus tumor.

Pathophysiology

Genetics

Associated Conditions

Gross Pathology

Microscopic Findings

References

  1. Kim DH (1999). “Glomus tumor of the finger tip and MRI appearance”. Iowa Orthop J. 19: 136–8. PMC 1888624. PMID 10847529.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Gombos Z, Zhang PJ (2008). “Glomus tumor”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 132 (9): 1448–52. doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1448:GT]2.0.CO;2. PMID 18788860.
  3. Kumar, Monique G.; Emnett, Ryan J.; Bayliss, Susan J.; Gutmann, David H. (2014). “Glomus tumors in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 71 (1): 44–48. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.913. ISSN 0190-9622.
  4. Stewart, D. R.; Sloan, J. L.; Yao, L.; Mannes, A. J.; Moshyedi, A.; Richard Lee, C.-C.; Sciot, R.; De Smet, L.; Mautner, V.-F.; Legius, E. (2010). “Diagnosis, management, and complications of glomus tumours of the digits in neurofibromatosis type 1”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 47 (8): 525–532. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.073965. ISSN 0022-2593.
  5. Pater TJ, Marks RM (2004). “Glomus tumor of the hallux: case presentation and review of the literature”. Foot Ankle Int. 25 (6): 434–7. doi:10.1177/107110070402500614. PMID 15215032.
  6. Fazwi R, Chandran PA, Ahmad TS (2011). “Glomus tumour: a retrospective review of 15 years experience in a single institution”. Malays Orthop J. 5 (3): 8–12. doi:10.5704/MOJ.1111.007. PMC 4093623. PMID 25279028.
  7. Glomus tumor. Libre pathology. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Glomus_tumour Accessed on February 1, 2016.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Glomus tumor. Wikimedia commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glomus_tumour_-_very_high_mag.jpg#/media/File:Glomus_tumour_-_intermed_mag.jpg Accessed on January 7, 2016.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

The cause of solitary glomus tumors has not been identified. Multiple glomus tumors are caused by a mutation in the GLMN (glomulin) gene.

Causes

  • The exact cause of solitary glomus tumors has not been identified. However, trauma may cause a weakening in the structure of the glomus body, resulting in reactive hypertrophy.[1]
  • Multiple glomus tumors are caused by a loss of function mutation in the GLMN (glomulin) gene.

References

  1. Grover C, Khurana A, Jain R, Rathi V (2013). “Transungual surgical excision of subungual glomus tumour”. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 6 (4): 196–203. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.123401. PMC 3884883. PMID 24470715.
Differentiating Glomus tumor from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

Solitary glomus tumors must be differentiated from leiomyoma and eccrine spiradenoma. Multiple glomus tumors must be differentiated from other diseases such as cavernous hemangioma and blue rubber-bleb nevus syndrome.

Differential diagnosis

The presence of pain in most cases means the differential diagnosis must include other painful tumors that can occur in the digits:[1]

References

  1. Rohrich RJ, Hochstein LM, Millwee RH (1994). “Subungual glomus tumors: an algorithmic approach”. Ann Plast Surg. 33 (3): 300–4. PMID 7985967.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lee W, Kwon SB, Cho SH, Eo SR, Kwon C (2015). “Glomus tumor of the hand”. Arch Plast Surg. 42 (3): 295–301. doi:10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.295. PMC 4439588. PMID 26015884.
  3. Chatterjee JS, Youssef AH, Brown RM, Nishikawa H (2005). “Congenital nodular multiple glomangioma: a case report”. J Clin Pathol. 58 (1): 102–3. doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.014324. PMC 1770555. PMID 15623496.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Glomus tumor. Libre pathology. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Glomus_tumour Accessed on February 1, 2016.
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

The exact incidence of glomus tumors is unknown. Females are more commonly affected with solitary glomus tumors (particularly subungual lesions) than males, while multiple lesions are slightly more common in males. Solitary glomus tumors can occur at any age; however, multiple glomus tumors commonly affect children.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

Age

  • Solitary glomus tumors can occur at any age.[4]
    • While previously thought to occur predominantly in young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 years, they have also been reported to be frequent in older adults between 40 and 70 years of age.
  • Multiple glomus tumors commonly affect children.
    • Multiple glomus tumors develop 11–15 years earlier than single lesions.
    • One third of the cases of multiple glomus tumors affect individuals younger than twenty years of age.

Gender

  • Females are more commonly affected with solitary glomus tumors (particularly subungual lesions) than males.[5]
  • Multiple lesions are slightly more common in males.[6]

References

  1. Nazerani S, Motamedi MH, Keramati MR (2010). “Diagnosis and management of glomus tumors of the hand”. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 14 (1): 8–13. doi:10.1097/BTH.0b013e3181c767d4. PMID 20216046.
  2. Harrison B, Moore AM, Calfee R, Sammer DM (2013). “The association between glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis”. J Hand Surg Am. 38 (8): 1571–4. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.025. PMID 23849732.
  3. Harrison B, Sammer D (2014). “Glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis: a newly recognized association”. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2 (9): e214. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000144. PMC 4229273. PMID 25426397.
  4. Mravic M, LaChaud G, Nguyen A, Scott MA, Dry SM, James AW (2015). “Clinical and histopathological diagnosis of glomus tumor: an institutional experience of 138 cases”. Int J Surg Pathol. 23 (3): 181–8. doi:10.1177/1066896914567330. PMC 4498398. PMID 25614464.
  5. Chou T, Pan SC, Shieh SJ, Lee JW, Chiu HY, Ho CL (2016). “Glomus Tumor: Twenty-Year Experience and Literature Review”. Ann Plast Surg. 76 Suppl 1: S35–40. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000684. PMID 26808758.
  6. D’Acri AM, Ramos-e-Silva M, Basílio-de-Oliveira C, Cerqueira A, Monteiro D, Pretti G; et al. (2002). “Multiple glomus tumors: recognition and diagnosis”. Skinmed. 1 (2): 94–8. PMID 14673334.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Roukoz A. Karam, M.D.[2]

Overview

There are no established risk factors for glomus tumor; however, an epidemiological relationship may exist between glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis.

Risk Factors

References

  1. Harrison B, Moore AM, Calfee R, Sammer DM (2013). “The association between glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis”. J Hand Surg Am. 38 (8): 1571–4. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.025. PMID 23849732.
  2. Harrison B, Sammer D (2014). “Glomus tumors and neurofibromatosis: a newly recognized association”. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2 (9): e214. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000144. PMC 4229273. PMID 25426397.
  3. Aqil N, Gallouj S, Moustaide K, Mernissi FZ (2018). “Painful tumors in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report”. J Med Case Rep. 12 (1): 319. doi:10.1186/s13256-018-1847-0. PMC 6194630. PMID 30336779.
Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

Screening for multiple glomus tumors by genetic testing is recommended among individuals with a family history of glomangiomas (autosomal dominant inheritance).

Screening

  • Screening for multiple glomus tumors by genetic testing is recommended among individuals with a family history of glomangiomas (autosomal dominant inheritance).[1]
  • Screening for genetic mutations in the glomulin gene helps in the diagnosis of approximately 70% of the patients with familial glomangiomas.[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Gombos Z, Zhang PJ (2008). “Glomus tumor”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 132 (9): 1448–52. doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1448:GT]2.0.CO;2. PMID 18788860.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]

Overview

If left untreated, patients with glomus tumors may progress to develop pain and nail discoloration. A common complication of the glomus tumor is malignant change in multiple tumors. Common complications of glomus tumors post operatively include nail deformities and recurrence. Prognosis is generally excellent for solitary glomus tumors and malignant glomus tumors treated with wide excision. However, the prognosis is poor for malignant glomus tumors with widespread metastases.

Natural History

If left untreated, patients with glomus tumors may progress to develop pain and nail discoloration.[1]

Complications

  • A common complication of the glomus tumor is malignant change in multiple glomus tumors (glomangiosarcomas).
    • Very rare and usually only locally invasive
    • Widespread metastases may occur which are fatal
  • Common complications of glomus tumors post operatively include:[1]
    • Nail deformity
    • Recurrence
      • Recurrence is thought to be a result of incomplete excision or, in the case of late recurrence, development of a new lesion at or near the excision site. Excision of the capsule of the tumor is required to prevent local recurrence.[2]
  • Glomus tumors may recur locally:[3]
    • 10% of cases
    • Usually infiltrative lesions
  • Malignant glomus tumors are exceptional and include:[4]
    • Glomus tumors showing marked nuclear atypia along with any mitotic activity
    • Glomus tumors containing atypical mitotic figures

Prognosis

Prognosis is generally excellent for solitary glomus tumors and malignant glomus tumors treated with wide excision.

However, the prognosis is poor for malignant glomus tumors with widespread metastases.[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Grover C, Khurana A, Jain R, Rathi V (2013). “Transungual surgical excision of subungual glomus tumour”. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 6 (4): 196–203. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.123401. PMC 3884883. PMID 24470715.
  2. Hazani R, Houle JM, Kasdan ML, Wilhelmi BJ (2008). “Glomus tumors of the hand”. Eplasty. 8: e48. PMC 2567120. PMID 18997858.
  3. Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Weiss SW (2001). “Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors”. Am J Surg Pathol. 25 (1): 1–12. PMID 11145243.
  4. Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Weiss SW (2001). “Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors”. Am J Surg Pathol. 25 (1): 1–12. PMID 11145243.
  5. Blanchard AJ (1941). “The Pathology of Glomus Tumours”. Can Med Assoc J. 44 (4): 357–60. PMC 1827043. PMID 20322052.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT scan | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters

Template:Epithelial neoplasms


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH