Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Low density lipoprotein

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, Low density lipoprotein-C

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [3] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [4]

Overview

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) belongs to the lipoprotein particle family. There is a direct association between high LDL and cardiovascular disease. Environmental and genetic factors are involved in the pathophysiology of high LDL. Several conditions may contribute to the pathophysiology of high LDL, such as diet high in saturated fat, hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, pregnancy, obesity, or medications such as amiodarone, cyclosporine, diuretics, and glucocorticoids.[1] Prior approaches to the management of LDL aimed towards the classification of LDL concentrations and the treatment of subjects with dyslipidemia to a target LDL concentration. In 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III classified LDL concentrations into optimal, near optimal, borderline high, high, and very high.[2] However, the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults no longer takes into consideration LDL cut-off concentration but rather identifies groups of patients among whom the benefit of statin outweighs the risk of adverse events.[1] There is an unmet need for more effective and tolerable therapies for the reduction of LDL-c, which is driving ongoing and future investigational therapies.

Historical Perspective

From the early 1950s onward, Fredrickson specialized in the study of plasma lipoproteins, compounds of proteins and lipids which transport lipids in the blood. However, the study of lipids in the blood has started early in the 1900’s. In 1949, Faraday Society in Birmingham organized the first symposium on lipoproteins and separated for the first time lipoproteins into alpha and beta types. In 1950, LDL was first isolated.[3] In 1973, Myant first hypothesized the role of LDL in the metabolism of cholesterol.[4]

Classification

Prior approaches to the management of LDL aimed towards the classification of LDL concentrations and the treatment of subjects with dyslipidemia to a target LDL concentration. In 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III classified LDL concentrations into optimal, near optimal, borderline high, high, and very high.[2] However, the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults no longer takes into consideration LDL cut-off concentration but rather identifies groups of patients among whom the benefit of statin outweighs the risk of adverse events.[1]

Physiology

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) belongs to the lipoprotein particle family. Its size is approximately 22 nm but since LDL particles contain a changing number of fatty acids they actually have a mass and size distribution. Each native LDL particle contains a single apolipoprotein B-100 molecule (Apo B-100, a protein with 4536 amino acid residues) that surrounds the fatty acids keeping them soluble in the aqueous environment.[5] The average composition of LDL is approximately 20% protein, 20% phospholipids, 40% cholesteryl esters, 10% unesterified cholesterol, and 5% triglycerides.[6]

Pathophysiology

Environmental and genetic factors are involved in the pathophysiology of high LDL. Several conditions may contribute to the pathophysiology of high LDL, such as diet high in saturated fat, hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, pregnancy, obesity, or medications such as amiodarone, cyclosporine, diuretics, and glucocorticoids.[1] Abnormally low LDL can occur, and they usually result from rare inherited conditions, such as familial hypobetalipoproteinemia and abetalipoproteinemia.

Causes

Low LDL

Low LDL levels can be caused by unusual inherited disorders of lipoprotein metabolism such as abetalipoproteinemia and hypobetalipoproteinemia.

High LDL

High LDL can be primary or secondary to diet high in saturated fat, hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, pregnancy, obesity, or medications such as amiodarone, cyclosporine, diuretics, and glucocorticoids.[1] High LDL can also be caused by inherited diseases that affect the lipid metabolism.

Epidemiology and Demographics

From 1976–1980 through 2007–2010, for U.S. adults aged 40–74, a decrease was observed in the prevalence of high LDL-cholesterol (LDL–C) from 59% to 28%, as well as an increase in adults using lipid-lowering medications and consuming a diet low in saturated fat. Despite recent advances in medical treatment, high LDL-C remains a significant public health problem in the United States, with more than one-quarter of adults aged 40–74 having high LDL–C.[7]

Risk Factors

Risk factors for high LDL include genetic predisposition, aging, and unhealthy life style choices.

Screening

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), screening for high LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), is indicated among men 35 years and older (Grade: A Recommendation), men age 20 to 35 years in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: B Recommendation), women age 45 years and older for in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: A Recommendation), and women age 20 to 45 years in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: B Recommendation).[8] There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening for dyslipidemia among infants, children, adolescents, or young adults less than 20 years of age (Grade: I statement).[9]

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

The natural history and the prognosis of high LDL concentrations are directly associated with the complications of atherosclerosis, namely cardiovascular disease (CVD) which is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Classically, elevated LDL concentration has been associated with significantly increased rates of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, emerging evidence has demonstrated that an elevated concentration of LDL is also strongly associated with insulin resistance as well as other forms of ischemic vascular diseases. The role of elevated levels of LDL in the development of ischemic complications, such as stroke, peripheral arterial disease, carotid atherosclerosis, and renovascular injury, has also been validated. The development of complications due to atherosclerosis are the major factors that determine the prognosis of patients with elevated LDL concentrations.

Diagnosis

Laboratory Findings

Chemical measures of lipid concentration have long been the most-used clinical measurement, not because they have the best correlation with individual outcome, but because these lab methods are less expensive and more widely available. However, there is increasing evidence and recognition of the value of more sophisticated measurements. Specifically, LDL particle number (concentration), and to a lesser extent size, have shown much tighter correlation with atherosclerotic progression and cardiovascular events than is obtained using chemical measures of total LDL concentration contained within the particles. LDL cholesterol concentration can be low, yet LDL particle number high and cardiovascular events rates are high. Alternatively, LDL cholesterol concentration can be relatively high, yet LDL particle number low and cardiovascular events are also low. If LDL particle concentration is tracked against event rates, many other statistical correlates of cardiovascular events, such as diabetes mellitus, obesity and smoking, lose much of their additive predictive power.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

While prior approaches to the management of LDL plasma concentration aimed towards treating the subjects with dyslipidemia to a target LDL concentration,[2] the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults no longer takes into consideration LDL cut-off concentration but rather identifies groups of patients among whom the benefit of statin outweighs the risk of adverse events. The 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines identifies the following statin benefit groups: subjects with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, subjects with LDL ≥ 190 mg/dL, subjects with diabetes mellitus PLUS age 40-75 years PLUS LDL 10-189 mg/dL, and subjects with LDL 70-189 mg/dL PLUS estimated 10 year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ≥ 7.5%. The pooled cohort equation should be used to estimate the 10 year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and guide the treatment among subjects with no diabetes mellitus or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle changes is a critical component of the management of patients with elevated LDL whether they are administered or not lipid lowering drugs.[1]

Landmark Trials

Future and Investigational Therapies

There is an association between the concentration of circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) and the risk of cardiovascular disease. There is an unmet need for more effective and tolerable therapies for the reduction of LDL-c. Ongoing studies are evaluating novel lipid-lowering therapeutic strategies, including anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to apolipoprotein B (apo B), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP), thyromimetics, squalene synthase, adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase, AMP-activated protein kinase, and sterol regulatory element binding proteins.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH; et al. (2014). “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63 (25 Pt B): 2889–934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. PMID 24239923.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (2001). “Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)”. JAMA. 285 (19): 2486–97. PMID 11368702.
  3. “http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01157a121”. Retrieved 8 November 2013. External link in |title= (help)
  4. Myant NB (1973). “Cholesterol metabolism”. J Clin Pathol Suppl (Assoc Clin Pathol). 5: 1–4. PMC 1436101. PMID 4354844.
  5. Segrest, J. P.; et al. (September 2001). “Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins”. Journal of Lipid Research. 42: 1346–1367.
  6. Hevonoja T, Pentikäinen MO, Hyvönen MT, Kovanen PT, Ala-Korpela M (2000). “Structure of low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles: basis for understanding molecular changes in modified LDL”. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1488 (3): 189–210. PMID 11082530.
  7. Kuklina EV, Carroll MD, Shaw KM, Hirsch R. Trends in high LDL cholesterol, cholesterol-lowering medication use, and dietary saturated-fat intake: United States, 1976–2010. NCHS data brief, no 117. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.
  8. Screening for Lipid Disorders in Adults, Topic Page. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. [1]
  9. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Lipid Disorders in Children: Recommendation Statement. July 2007.[2]

Template:Vascular diseases


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]

Overview

From the early 1950s onward, Fredrickson specialized in the study of plasma lipoproteins, compounds of proteins and lipids which transport lipids in the blood. However, the study of lipids in the blood has started early in the 1900’s. In 1949, Faraday Society in Birmingham organized the first symposium on lipoproteins and separated for the first time lipoproteins into alpha and beta types. In 1950, LDL was first isolated.[1] In 1973, Myant first hypothesized the role of LDL in the metabolism of cholesterol.[2]

Historical Perspective

  • In 1949, a new method for quantitative measurement of LDL and other lipoproteins using ultracentrifuge was developed.[3]
  • In 1950, LDL was first isolated.[1]
  • In 1963, another lipoprotein, Lp(a), was discovered as a complex particle in human plasma in an immunochemical study.[4]
  • In 1973, Myant first hypothesized the role of LDL in the metabolism of cholesterol.[2]
  • In 1979, the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPPT) demonstrated that reductions in total cholesterol and LDL were associated with reduction in coronary heart disease risk. It was reported that a 25% reduction in cholesterol or a 35% reduction in LDL cholesterol resulted in a 49% decrease in coronary heart disease risk.[5][6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 “http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01157a121”. Retrieved 8 November 2013. External link in |title= (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 Myant NB (1973). “Cholesterol metabolism”. J Clin Pathol Suppl (Assoc Clin Pathol). 5: 1–4. PMC 1436101. PMID 4354844.
  3. GOFMAN, JW.; LINDGREN, FT.; ELLIOTT, H. (1949). “Ultracentrifugal studies of lipoproteins of human serum”. J Biol Chem. 179 (2): 973–9. PMID 18150027. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. BERG, K. (1963). “A NEW SERUM TYPE SYSTEM IN MAN–THE LP SYSTEM”. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 59: 369–82. PMID 14064818.
  5. “Plasma lipid distributions in selected North American populations: the Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. The Lipid Research Clinics Program Epidemiology Committee”. Circulation. 60 (2): 427–39. 1979. PMID 312704. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. “The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease”. JAMA. 251 (3): 351–64. 1984. PMID 6361299. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)



Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]

Overview

Prior approaches to the management of LDL aimed towards the classification of LDL concentrations and the treatment of subjects with dyslipidemia to a target LDL concentration. In 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III classified LDL concentrations into optimal, near optimal, borderline high, high, and very high.[1] However, the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults no longer takes into consideration LDL cut-off concentration but rather identifies groups of patients among whom the benefit of statin outweighs the risk of adverse events.[2]

Classification

Classification of the Different Concentrations of LDL

Shown below is the classification of the different concentrations of LDL according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III published in 2001.[1]

Concentration mg/dL Concentration mmol/L Interpretation
<100 <2.6 Optimal
100 to 129 2.6 to 3.3 Near optimal
130 to 159 3.3 to 4.1 Borderline high
160 to 189 4.1 to 4.9 High
>190 >4.9 Very high

Classification of Statin Benefit Groups

The 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults no longer takes into consideration LDL cut-off concentration but rather identifies groups of patients among whom the benefit of statin outweighs the risk of adverse events. Shown below is the classification of the four statin benefit groups.[2]

Statin benefit groups
1- Presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as prior acute coronary syndrome, stable or unstable angina, coronary revascularization, non coronary arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery disease
2- LDL ≥ 190 mg/dL
3- Diabetes mellitus PLUS age 40-75 years PLUS LDL 10-189 mg/dL
4- LDL 70-189 PLUS estimated 10 year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ≥ 7.5%

The estimated 10 year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease should be calculated every 4 to 6 years using the pooled cohort equation.[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (2001). “Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)”. JAMA. 285 (19): 2486–97. PMID 11368702.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH; et al. (2014). “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63 (25 Pt B): 2889–934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. PMID 24239923.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Physiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]

Overview

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) belongs to the lipoprotein particle family. Its size is approximately 22 nm but since LDL particles contain a changing number of fatty acids they actually have a mass and size distribution. Each native LDL particle contains a single apolipoprotein B-100 molecule (Apo B-100, a protein with 4536 amino acid residues) that surrounds the fatty acids keeping them soluble in the aqueous environment.[1] The average composition of LDL is approximately 20% protein, 20% phospholipids, 40% cholesteryl esters, 10% unesterified cholesterol, and 5% triglycerides.[2]

Physiology

Structure

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) belongs to the lipoprotein particle family. It has a discoid shape with an average diameter of approximately 20 nm.[3] However, LDL is considered a heterogeneous molecule due to fluctuating density, size, and flotation rate.

The LDL particle can be structurally divided into 3 layers according to molecular orientational behavior:

  • Outer surface layer with tangential orientation: It forms a shell composed of phospholipid monolayer to cover the core. The phospholipid monolayer is organized in a way that hydrophilic residues with polar head groups interact with the outer aqueous solvent; while the inner hydrophobic residues face the lipid interior.
  • Interfacial layer with radial orientation
  • A polar lipid core with random orientation: It contains cholesteryl esters and triglycerides.[2][4]

Each native LDL particle contains a single apolipoprotein B-100 (Apo-100) molecule. Apo B-100 is a protein with 4536 amino acid residues. It encircles the fatty acids keeping them soluble in the aqueous environment.[3]

ApoB-100 covers the surface layer of LDL in a heterogeneous fashion, covering one hemisphere of LDL, while keeping other surfaces uncovered with exposed lipids.[2]

Shown below is a table depicting the biochemistry characteristics of LDL.

Lipoprotein Density Size % Protein % Phospholipids % Free cholesterol % Cholesterol ester % Triglyceride Apolipoprotein[5]
LDL 1.019–1.063 21.6 22% 22% 8 42 6 B 100

For more information about the biochemistry of all lipoproteins, click here.

LDL Subtype Patterns

LDL particles actually vary in size and density, and studies have shown that a pattern that has more small dense LDL particles (“Pattern B”) equates to a higher risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) than does a pattern with more of the larger and less dense LDL particles (“Pattern A”). This is because the smaller particles are more easily able to penetrate the endothelium. “Pattern I”, meaning “intermediate”, indicates that most LDL particles are very close in size to the normal gaps in the endothelium (26 nm).

The correspondence between Pattern B and coronary heart disease has been suggested by some in the medical community to be stronger than the correspondence between the LDL number measured in the standard lipid profile test. Tests to measure these LDL subtype patterns have been more expensive and not widely available, so the common lipid profile test has been used more commonly.

Role

LDL’s main role is mediating metabolism and transport of cholesterol. LDL transports cholesterol and triglycerides from the liver to peripheral tissues. LDL transports approximately 70% of circulating cholesterol.[6] It is formed in the circulation from VLDL by the action of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). LDL receptors, located at specific coat pits on plasma membrane of specific target cells mediate the selective uptake of molecules into cells by endocytosis. The coat pits contain clathrin protein on the cytoplasmic end of the plasma membrane to promote endocytosis. LDL receptors are glycoproteins that have negatively charged domains capable of interacting with positively charged arginine and lysine residues of apo B-100. Inside the cell, LDL migrates within a vesicle and is targeted to be degraded within the lysosome that contains hydrolases capable of digesting components of LDL. LDL degradation produces cholesterol, amino acids, glycerol and fatty acids.[7]

Not only does LDL transport cholesterol, but also this activity is key to control cholesterol homeostasis.[8] Cholesterol derived from LDL following degradation within the lysosome contributes to the feedback inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by directly suppressing the rate-limiting step catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase enzyme.[7] LDL also has the ability to suppress the transcription of LDL receptor genes, preventing accumulation of cholesterol and keeping cholesterol amounts within membranes constant despite varying cholesterol supply and demand.[9][10]

References

  1. Segrest, J. P.; et al. (September 2001). “Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins”. Journal of Lipid Research. 42: 1346–1367.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hevonoja T, Pentikäinen MO, Hyvönen MT, Kovanen PT, Ala-Korpela M (2000). “Structure of low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles: basis for understanding molecular changes in modified LDL”. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1488 (3): 189–210. PMID 11082530.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Segrest JP, Jones MK, De Loof H, Dashti N (2001). “Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins”. J Lipid Res. 42 (9): 1346–67. PMID 11518754.
  4. Prassl R (2011). “Human low density lipoprotein: the mystery of core lipid packing”. J Lipid Res. 52 (2): 187–8. doi:10.1194/jlr.E013417. PMC 3023539. PMID 21131533.
  5. Ballantyne, Christie M. (2009). Clinical lipidology : a companion to Braunwald’s heart diseas. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier. ISBN 1-4160-5469-3.
  6. Rader DJ, Cohen J, Hobbs HH (2003). “Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment”. J Clin Invest. 111 (12): 1795–803. doi:10.1172/JCI18925. PMC 161432. PMID 12813012.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Goldstein JL, Brown MS (1973). “Familial hypercholesterolemia: identification of a defect in the regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity associated with overproduction of cholesterol”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 70 (10): 2804–8. PMC 427113. PMID 4355366.
  8. Murtola T, Vuorela TA, Hyvonen MT et al. Low density lipoprotein: Structure, dynamics, and interactions of apoB-100 with lipids. Soft Matter. 2011;7:8136-8141
  9. Brown MS, Goldstein JL (1975). “Regulation of the activity of the low density lipoprotein receptor in human fibroblasts”. Cell. 6 (3): 307–16. PMID 212203.
  10. Brown MS, Goldstein JL (1999). “A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96 (20): 11041–8. PMC 34238. PMID 10500120.



Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Environmental and genetic factors are involved in the pathophysiology of high LDL. Several conditions may contribute to the pathophysiology of high LDL, such as diet high in saturated fat, hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, pregnancy, obesity, or medications such as amiodarone, cyclosporine, diuretics, and glucocorticoids.[1] Abnormally low LDL can occur, and they usually result from rare inherited conditions, such as familial hypobetalipoproteinemia, abetalipoproteinemia, Anderson’s disease (chylomicron retention disease), familial combined hypolipidemia, and PCSK9 mutations.

Pathophysiology of High LDL

Familial Hypercholersterolemia

  • Contrary to other polygenic etiologies of elevated LDL, familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), also known as hyperlipidemia type II-A according to Fredrickson’s classification, is a monogenic hypercholesterolemia due to deficiency of LDL receptors caused by a mutation of LDLR gene on chromosome 19. The disorder follows an autosomal co-dominant segregation pattern.[2]
  • Homozygous FH is a rare disorder; where individuals have extremely high levels of LDL, often > 1000 mg/dl in the presence of family history and cardiac or cutaneous symptoms, irrespective of other environmental factors, like diet, medications, or exercise.[3]
  • Patients with homozygous FH are very susceptible to early-onset cardiovascular disease along with cutaneous manifestations of abnormal lipid metabolism, such as eruptive xanthomas.
  • Goldstein and Brown described three cardinal features of FH:[4]
    • Selective elevation of LDL
    • Selective deposition of LDL-derived cholesterol into macrophages throughout the body but not in parenchyma
    • Inheritance as autosomal dominant trait with gene dosage effect
  • On the other hand, heterozygous FH, where only one mutated allele is present, has an incidence of 1 out of 500.[5] It is defined as any of the following:
    • LDL-C levels > 200 mg/dL + coronary heart disease/risk equivalents
    • LDL-C levels > 300 mg/dL regardless of disease or risk equivalents
  • Heterogeneous FH responds better to anti-lipidemics than the homogeneous counterpart.[2]

Diabetes Mellitus

  • Although plasma LDL concentration may be normal in patients with type II diabetes mellitus, several qualitative modifications aid in promoting atherosclerosis in this particular population.[6] The quantity of small dense triglyceride-rich LDL particles seem to be more abundant in patients with type II diabetes.[7]
  • Furthermore, patients with diabetes have increased LDL plasma residence time that contributes to increased arterial deposition of cholesterol and atherosclerosis.[6] Altered residence time is attributed to reduced LDL catabolism and decreased turnover,[6] probably due to decreased expression of LDL receptors.[8] The modification in LDL receptor have been attributed to diabetes that causes increased glycation of Apo-B within LDL altering adequate LDL receptor affinity and even worsening LDL oxidation.[9]
  • However, it is notable that insulin therapy targeting diabetes and anti-lipidemic treatment with statins have profound beneficial effects on the unfavorable LDL modifications present in diabetics. By inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, statin therapy indirectly increases the expression of LDL receptors thus improving the abnormal affinity.[6]

Renal Disease

  • Renal disease causes a specific form of secondary dyslipidemia only when heavy proteinuria is present. Heavy proteinuria is required to exhibit decreased LDL receptor gene expression in hepatocytes, and alter gene expression of 2 key enzymes for LDL and cholesterol homeostasis: Increased activity of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis, and reduced activity of 7α-hydroxylase, the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol metabolism and bile acid synthesis.[10]
  • Similar to the pathogenesis observed in diabetic patients, nephrotic dyslipidemia also demonstrates changes in Apo-B that reduce LDL affinity to its receptor. The proportion of atherogenic small dense LDL particles is also increased.
  • Individuals undergoing dialysis also have abnormal LDL profiles. Patients on hemodialysis generally have normal LDL cholesterol but more concentrated small dense particules.[11] Specifically, patients on peritoneal dialysis generally have higher LDL and total cholesterol due to the considerable protein loss into the peritoneal dialysate that stimulates hepatic protein synthesis, including LDL and other lipoproteins.[12]

Liver Disease

  • Cholestatic liver disease is associated with marked hyperlipidemia and elevated LDL. It is hypothesized that because HDL is also elevated in these patients and is believed to play a protective role, cardiovascular disease does not seem to be increased in patients with cholestatic liver disease. Such outcomes, however, remain controversial.[15]

Thyroid Disease

  • Hypothyroidism is associated with marked elevations of LDL due to reduced LDL receptors that decrease LDL clearance. Since hypothyroidism also reduces oxygen consumption of cardiac myocytes, cardiac contractility is reduced and vascular resistance is increased.
  • Both vascular changes and LDL accumulation seen in hypothyroidism promote atherosclerosis.[16]

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Oxidized LDL measured in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) shows significant increase when compared to control groups.[17] This was believed to be due to the hypoxemia experienced by these patients that cause lipid peroxidation and an imbalance between reactive oxygen species and counteracting antioxidant reserve.[18] However, newer research findings have not entirely supported this theory; thus the exact mechanism that associates OSAS and elevated LDL remains controversial. Elevated LDL normalizes following appropriate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for patients with OSAS.

High LDL and Atherosclerosis

  • The term atherosclerosis was first introduced by Marchand to describe the association between fatty degeneration and medium to large-sized arterial sub-intimal thickening. Since the early 1980s, it has been emphasized that LDL oxidation is important for the development of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease (CHD).[19] Atherosclerosis is considered the end-product and the most feared outcome of nearly all diseases that accompany an elevated LDL.
  • LDL undergoes oxidative modification in vivo by mechanisms that are still poorly understood. In-vitro studies have hypothesized the role of several enzymes in LDL oxidation, including 15-lipoxygenase, myeloperoxidase, xanthine oxidase, among several others.[20] It is believed that LDL oxidative modification accelerates accumulation of cholesterol within macrophages (foam cells) and initiate atherosclerotic lesions, called fatty streaks. Fatty streaks predispose to vascular disease and perturbation in endothelial function.
  • As a result, adhesive proteins such as ICAM-1 are overactivated allowing leukocytic and monocytic accumulation.[6] The latter plays a central role in the activation of inflammatory cascade and proliferation of smooth muscle cell and monocytes, further enhancing the inflammatory process and contributing to LDL oxidation and uptake by macrophages. Fatty streaks then evolve gradually into fibrous plaques, and subsequent lipid accumulation by LDL activity from the blood to the vessel wall leads to plaque instability and rupture resulting finally in thrombotic occlusion of the arterial bed. Oxidized LDL is considered significantly atherogenic and chemotactic for macrophages.
  • Once LDL moves from the blood to the vessel media, one of three outcomes will occur:
  1. LDL returns to blood causing regression of the lesion.
  2. LDL undergoes oxidation due to leukocytes and free radicals.
  3. LDL are taken up by scavenger receptors of macrophages that become foam cells. Scavenger receptors have particular recognition to LDL in oxidized form only.

Pathophysiology of Abnormally Low LDL

  • Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by apolipoprotein B mutations leading to loss of the ability to form lipoproteins in the liver and intestine.[21][22] Typically, plasma cholesterol levels will be in the range of 80-120 mg/dL, and LDL cholesterol will be in the range of 50-80 mg/dL.[22]
  • Abetalipoproteinemia is an autosomal recessive disorder that affects the absorption of dietary fats, cholesterol, and certain vitamins. People affected by this disorder are not able to make certain lipoproteins containing apo-B: chylomicrons, VLDL, and LDL. Two genes have been identified in which mutations are associated with this disorder: microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB).[23]
  • Anderson’s disease or chylomicron retention disease is an extremely rare disorder with approximately 50 cases reported. Patients with Anderson’s disease have a mutated SAR1B protein in enterocytes. Although they are able to synthesize chylomicrons they are unable to transport them out of the enterocytes leading to accumulation.[24]
  • Familial combined hypolipidemia (FCH) is an inherited disorder due to a mutation in angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3). FCH leads to very low levels of LDL, HDL, triglycerides, and apo-B.[21]
  • Protein convertase subtilin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) mutations lead to a gain of function that increases available LDL-C receptors on the surface of hepatocytes. Patients with PCSK9 mutations have LDL-C levels usually below 20 mg/dL with no other comorbidities observed and a very dramatic reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular disease. These patients were the basis for the development of PSCK9 blocking agents such as evolocumab, alirocumab, and bococizumab.[25]

References

  1. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH; et al. (2014). “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63 (25 Pt B): 2889–934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. PMID 24239923.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Rader DJ, Cohen J, Hobbs HH (2003). “Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment”. J Clin Invest. 111 (12): 1795–803. doi:10.1172/JCI18925. PMC 161432. PMID 12813012.
  3. Maiorana A, Nobili V, Calandra S, Francalanci P, Bernabei S, El Hachem M; et al. (2011). “Preemptive liver transplantation in a child with familial hypercholesterolemia”. Pediatr Transplant. 15 (2): E25–9. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01383.x. PMID 20846238.
  4. Goldstein JL, Brown MS (1973). “Familial hypercholesterolemia: identification of a defect in the regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity associated with overproduction of cholesterol”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 70 (10): 2804–8. PMC 427113. PMID 4355366.
  5. Nemati MH, Astaneh B (2010). “Optimal management of familial hypercholesterolemia: treatment and management strategies”. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 6: 1079–88. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S8283. PMC 3004511. PMID 21191428.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Vergès B (2005). “New insight into the pathophysiology of lipid abnormalities in type 2 diabetes”. Diabetes Metab. 31 (5): 429–39. PMID 16357786.
  7. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Krauss RM (1992). “LDL subclass phenotypes and triglyceride metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes”. Arterioscler Thromb. 12 (12): 1496–502. PMID 1450181.
  8. Duvillard L, Florentin E, Lizard G, Petit JM, Galland F, Monier S; et al. (2003). “Cell surface expression of LDL receptor is decreased in type 2 diabetic patients and is normalized by insulin therapy”. Diabetes Care. 26 (5): 1540–4. PMID 12716819.
  9. Lyons TJ (1992). “Lipoprotein glycation and its metabolic consequences”. Diabetes. 41 Suppl 2: 67–73. PMID 1526339.
  10. Liang K, Vaziri ND (1997). “Gene expression of LDL receptor, HMG-CoA reductase, and cholesterol-7 alpha-hydroxylase in chronic renal failure”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 12 (7): 1381–6. PMID 9249773.
  11. Kronenberg F, Lingenhel A, Neyer U, Lhotta K, König P, Auinger M; et al. (2003). “Prevalence of dyslipidemic risk factors in hemodialysis and CAPD patients”. Kidney Int Suppl (84): S113–6. PMID 12694323.
  12. Wheeler DC (1996). “Abnormalities of lipoprotein metabolism in CAPD patients”. Kidney Int Suppl. 56: S41–6. PMID 8914053.
  13. Day CP, James OF (1998). “Steatohepatitis: a tale of two “hits”?”. Gastroenterology. 114 (4): 842–5. PMID 9547102.
  14. Fon Tacer K, Rozman D (2011). “Nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease: focus on lipoprotein and lipid deregulation”. J Lipids. 2011: 783976. doi:10.1155/2011/783976. PMC 3136146. PMID 21773052.
  15. Longo M, Crosignani A, Podda M (2001). “Hyperlipidemia in Chronic Cholestatic Liver Disease”. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 4 (2): 111–114. PMID 11469968.
  16. Duntas LH (2002). “Thyroid disease and lipids”. Thyroid. 12 (4): 287–93. doi:10.1089/10507250252949405. PMID 12034052.
  17. Kizawa T, Nakamura Y, Takahashi S, Sakurai S, Yamauchi K, Inoue H (2009). “Pathogenic role of angiotensin II and oxidised LDL in obstructive sleep apnoea”. Eur Respir J. 34 (6): 1390–8. doi:10.1183/09031936.00009709. PMID 19574336.
  18. Wali SO, Bahammam AS, Massaeli H, Pierce GN, Iliskovic N, Singal PK; et al. (1998). “Susceptibility of LDL to oxidative stress in obstructive sleep apnea”. Sleep. 21 (3): 290–6. PMID 9595608.
  19. Steinbrecher UP, Parthasarathy S, Leake DS, Witztum JL, Steinberg D (1984). “Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 81 (12): 3883–7. PMC 345326. PMID 6587396.
  20. Segrest JP, Jones MK, De Loof H, Dashti N (2001). “Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins”. J Lipid Res. 42 (9): 1346–67. PMID 11518754.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Musunuru K, Pirruccello JP, Do R, Peloso GM, Guiducci C, Sougnez C; et al. (2010). “Exome sequencing, ANGPTL3 mutations, and familial combined hypolipidemia”. N Engl J Med. 363 (23): 2220–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1002926. PMC 3008575. PMID 20942659.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Schonfeld G, Lin X, Yue P (2005). “Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia: genetics and metabolism”. Cell Mol Life Sci. 62 (12): 1372–8. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-4473-0. PMID 15818469.
  23. Welty FK (2014). “Hypobetalipoproteinemia and abetalipoproteinemia”. Curr Opin Lipidol. 25 (3): 161–8. doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000072. PMC 4465983. PMID 24751931.
  24. Okada T, Miyashita M, Fukuhara J, Sugitani M, Ueno T, Samson-Bouma ME; et al. (2011). “Anderson’s disease/chylomicron retention disease in a Japanese patient with uniparental disomy 7 and a normal SAR1B gene protein coding sequence”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 6: 78. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-6-78. PMC 3284428. PMID 22104167.
  25. Mabuchi H, Nohara A, Noguchi T, Kobayashi J, Kawashiri MA, Inoue T; et al. (2014). “Genotypic and phenotypic features in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia caused by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) gain-of-function mutation”. Atherosclerosis. 236 (1): 54–61. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.06.005. PMID 25014035.



Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Low LDL | High LDL

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]

Overview

From 1976–1980 through 2007–2010, for U.S. adults aged 40–74, a decrease was observed in the prevalence of high LDL-cholesterol (LDL–C) from 59% to 28%, as well as an increase in adults using lipid-lowering medications and consuming a diet low in saturated fat. Despite recent advances in medical treatment, high LDL-C remains a significant public health problem in the United States, with more than one-quarter of adults aged 40–74 having high LDL–C.[1]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

In the United States, the prevalence of high LDL–C significantly decreased from 59% in 1976–1980 to 42% in 1988–1994, and to 33% in 2001–2004, reaching 27% in 2007–2010.[1]

The decrease in the prevalence of high LDL is paralleled by an increase in the use of cholesterol-lowering medication that grew from 5% in 1988–1994 to 17% in 2001–2004, and reached 23% in 2007–2010. In addition, the percentage of adults meeting guidelines for low saturated-fat intake increased significantly from 1976–1980 to 1988–1994, from 25% to 41%, but no significant change occurred from 1988–1994 through 2007–2010.[1]

Shown below is a diagram depicting the age-adjusted prevalence of high LDL cholesterol among adults aged 40–74, by sex and age in the United States between 1976–1980 and 2007–2010. (Source: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.)

Age-adjusted prevalence of high LDL cholesterol among adults aged 40–74, by sex and age: United States, 1976–1980 to 2007–2010

Shown below is a diagram depicting the age adjusted use of cholesterol-lowering medications among adults aged 40–74 in the United States between 1988–1994 and 2007–2010. (Source: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.)

Age adjusted use of cholesterol-lowering medications among adults aged 40–74 in the United States between 1988–1994 and 2007–2010

Shown below an image depicting the age-adjusted trends in prevalence of high LDL cholesterol, use of cholesterol-lowering medications, and low saturated-fat intake among adults aged 40–74 in the United States between 1976–1980 and 2007–2010.

1 Significant decreasing linear trends from 1976–1980 to 2007–2010 (p < 0.05).
2 Significant increase from 1976–1980 to 1988–1994 (p < 0.05); no significant change from 1988–1994 to 2007–2010.
3 Significant increasing trend from 1988–1994 to 2007–2010.

Gender

Between 1976–1980 and 2007–2010, the prevalence of high LDL–C significantly decreased among U.S. men from 65% to 31%.

The prevalence of high LDL–C also significantly decreased among U.S. women from 54% to 24% between 1976–1980 and 2007–2010.[1]

Age

Between 2007–2010, the prevalence of high LDL–C for U.S. adults aged 40–64 was between 6% to 27%. The prevalence of high LDL–C among subjects aged 65–74 was 72% to 30%.[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Kuklina EV, Carroll MD, Shaw KM, Hirsch R. Trends in high LDL cholesterol, cholesterol-lowering medication use, and dietary saturated-fat intake: United States, 1976–2010. NCHS data brief, no 117. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vendhan Ramanujam M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

Risk factors for high LDL include genetic predisposition, aging, and unhealthy life style choices.

Risk Factors for High LDL

Common Risk Factors

Common risk factors for elevated LDL concentration include:

  • Genetic predisposition and family: The genetic predisposition to elevated LDL most probably involves a polygenic mechanism and a variable penetrance.[1]
  • Aging: Men who are 45 years or older and women who are 55 years or older are at increased risk of having high LDL levels.[2][3]
  • Life style choices:[6]
    • A diet high in trans fat and saturated fat
    • Physical inactivity
    • Smoking (especially in diabetics)
    • Excessive alcohol intake
  • Overweight or obesity[7]
  • Puberty: Puberty can predispose to both increase in LDL level and LDL particle size.[10][11]

Less Common Risk Factors

References

  1. Talmud, PJ.; Shah, S.; Whittall, R.; Futema, M.; Howard, P.; Cooper, JA.; Harrison, SC.; Li, K.; Drenos, F. (2013). “Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case-control study”. Lancet. 381 (9874): 1293–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62127-8. PMID 23433573. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Félix-Redondo, FJ.; Grau, M.; Fernández-Bergés, D. (2013). “Cholesterol and cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Facts and gaps”. Aging Dis. 4 (3): 154–69. PMID 23730531. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Parini, P.; Angelin, B.; Rudling, M. (1999). “Cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in aging: reversal of hypercholesterolemia by growth hormone treatment in old rats”. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 19 (4): 832–9. PMID 10195906. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Lee, JS.; Hayashi, K.; Mishra, G.; Yasui, T.; Kubota, T.; Mizunuma, H. (2013). “Independent association between age at natural menopause and hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus: Japan nurses’ health study”. J Atheroscler Thromb. 20 (2): 161–9. PMID 23079582. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. Honjo, H.; Tanaka, K.; Urabe, M.; Naitoh, K.; Ogino, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Okada, H. “Menopause and hyperlipidemia: pravastatin lowers lipid levels without decreasing endogenous estrogens”. Clin Ther. 14 (5): 699–707. PMID 1345259.
  6. Magnussen, CG.; Thomson, R.; Cleland, VJ.; Ukoumunne, OC.; Dwyer, T.; Venn, A. (2011). “Factors affecting the stability of blood lipid and lipoprotein levels from youth to adulthood: evidence from the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study”. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 165 (1): 68–76. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.246. PMID 21199983. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  7. Kesaniemi, YA.; Grundy, SM. “Increased low density lipoprotein production associated with obesity”. Arteriosclerosis. 3 (2): 170–7. PMID 6838434.
  8. Harris, MI. (2008). “Hypercholesterolemia in diabetes and glucose intolerance in the U.S. population”. Indian J Clin Biochem. 23 (3): 209–17. doi:10.1007/s12291-008-0048-9. PMID 2310575. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. Emet, T.; Ustüner, I.; Güven, SG.; Balık, G.; Ural, UM.; Tekin, YB.; Sentürk, S.; Sahin, FK.; Avşar, AF. (2013). “Plasma lipids and lipoproteins during pregnancy and related pregnancy outcomes”. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 288 (1): 49–55. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2750-y. PMID 23400357. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. Kaitosaari, T.; Simell, O.; Viikari, J.; Raitakari, O.; Siltala, M.; Hakanen, M.; Leino, A.; Jokinen, E.; Rönnemaa, T. (2009). “Tracking and determinants of LDL particle size in healthy children from 7 to 11 years of age: the STRIP Study”. Eur J Pediatr. 168 (5): 531–9. doi:10.1007/s00431-008-0780-4. PMID 18604555. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Chen, TJ.; Ji, CY.; Hu, YH. (2009). “Genetic and environmental influences on serum lipids and the effects of puberty: a Chinese twin study”. Acta Paediatr. 98 (6): 1029–36. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01257.x. PMID 19292833. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Rao, P.; Reddy, GC.; Kanagasabapathy, AS. “Malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome in Chronic Kidney disease”.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]

Overview

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), screening for dyslipidemia, which includes high LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), is indicated among men 35 years and older (Grade: A Recommendation), men 20 to 35 years old in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: B Recommendation), women 45 years and older in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: A Recommendation), and women 20 to 45 years old in case of an elevated risk for coronary heart disease (Grade: B Recommendation).[1] There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening for dyslipidemia among infants, children, adolescents, or young adults less than 20 years of age (Grade: I statement).[1]

Screening

Screening Indications

Screening in Adults

Screening for dyslipidemia, including high LDL, depends on the gender, age, and the risk for coronary heart disease. Screening for dyslipidemia is indicated among the following:[1]

Screening in Children

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening for dyslipidemia among infants, children, adolescents, or young adults less than 20 years of age (Grade: I statement).[1]

Screening Components

Screening for dyslipidemia includes:[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Screening for Lipid Disorders in Adults, Topic Page. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. [1]
  2. Jellinger PS, Smith DA, Mehta AE, Ganda O, Handelsman Y, Rodbard HW; et al. (2012). “American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists’ Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Atherosclerosis: executive summary”. Endocr Pract. 18 (2): 269–93. PMID 22507559.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Prognosis and Complications

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]

Overview

The natural history and the prognosis of high LDL concentrations are directly associated with the complications of atherosclerosis, namely cardiovascular disease (CVD) which is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Classically, elevated LDL concentration has been associated with significantly increased rates of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, emerging evidence has demonstrated that an elevated concentration of LDL is also strongly associated with insulin resistance as well as other forms of ischemic vascular diseases. The role of elevated levels of LDL in the development of ischemic complications, such as stroke, peripheral arterial disease, carotid atherosclerosis, and renovascular injury, has also been validated. The development of complications due to atherosclerosis are the major factors that determine the prognosis of patients with elevated LDL concentrations.

Complications

The natural history and prognosis of patients with elevated LDL are directly related to the complications associated with dyslipidemia. The development of complications due to atherosclerosis are the major factors that determine the prognosis of patients with elevated LDL concentrations. The majority of patients with elevated plasma LDL and atherosclerosis who are left untreated often develop manifestations of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the most common cause of death worldwide. Elevated LDL is also frequently associated with other cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and low HDL that lead more rapidly to the development of cardiovascular disease.[1][2] Shown below is a list of complications associated with elevated concentrations of LDL and atherosclerosis:

Coronary Artery Disease

  • Dyslipidemia caused by elevated LDL is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and often regarded as a prerequisite.[3]
  • There is a direct association between cardiovascular death and duration of elevated plasma LDL levels.[4]
  • An increase of LDL by 10 mg/dL is associated with a 12% increase in CVD risk in both genders.
  • Accumulating evidence has proved the role of elevated LDL in the development of atherosclerosis and has demonstrated that lowering LDL attributes to significant reductions (30-37%) in CAD.[5]

Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin Resistance

  • Elevated concentrations of small dense LDL is often observed among patients before development of insulin resistance.[6]
  • The majority of patients with elevated LDL have other components of the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance.[6]

Stroke

  • The association between elevated LDL and stroke has been observed, but the association has not been as strongly established as in the case of coronary artery disease.[7]
  • Nonetheless, statin therapy is important in cerebrovascular events, especially among patients with other manifestations of atherosclerosis, namely coronary artery disease. Statin therapy may significantly reduce the rate of ischemic stroke by approximately 20-30%.[7][8]
  • The true relation between elevated LDL levels and ischemic stroke as a complication is yet to be delineated.

Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis

  • Elevated LDL is the primary risk factor for the initiation and development of carotid artery atherosclerosis.
  • A reduction of LDL concentrations by at least 25% is associated with a significant reduction in the radiographic progression of carotid atherosclerosis

Renovascular Disease

  • Elevations of LDL is hypothesized to be the major initiator of renovascular injury associated with renal artery stenosis.[9]
  • Oxidation of high concentrations of LDL, along with an increasein local and systemic oxidative stress, promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause vasoconstriction and worsen renal ischemia.[10]
  • Emerging evidence currently favors the pharmacologic management of dyslipidemia for the treatment of renal artery stenosis compared to angioplasty.[9]

Peripheral Arterial Disease

  • Elevated LDL is a risk factor for the development of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and contributes to its progression and other manifestations of CVD.
  • The aggressive management of atherosclerosis is a primary goal in the management of PAD, given the abundance of data to suggest that LDL normalization improves femoral arterial atherosclerosis and alters the natural history of PAD.

Death

  • The Framingham study demonstrated that elevated LDL is associated with non-CAD-death among both genders.[2]

References

  1. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D (1993). “Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial”. Diabetes Care. 16 (2): 434–44. PMID 8432214.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Gordon T, Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Dawber TR (1981). “Lipoproteins, cardiovascular disease, and death. The Framingham study”. Arch Intern Med. 141 (9): 1128–31. PMID 7259370.
  3. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM; et al. (2011). “Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association”. Circulation. 123 (4): e18–e209. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. PMID 21160056.
  4. Rader DJ, Cohen J, Hobbs HH (2003). “Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment”. J Clin Invest. 111 (12): 1795–803. doi:10.1172/JCI18925. PMC 161432. PMID 12813012.
  5. Sharma SB, Garg S (2012). “Small dense LDL: risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and its therapeutic modulation”. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 49 (2): 77–85. PMID 22650003.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Solano MP, Goldberg RB (2006). “Management of dyslipidemia in diabetes”. Cardiol Rev. 14 (3): 125–35. doi:10.1097/01.crd.0000188034.76283.5e. PMID 16628021.
  7. 7.0 7.1 “Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)”. Lancet. 344 (8934): 1383–9. 1994. PMID 7968073.
  8. “Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group”. N Engl J Med. 339 (19): 1349–57. 1998. doi:10.1056/NEJM199811053391902. PMID 9841303.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Annigeri RA (2012). “Medical therapy is best for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Arguments for”. Indian J Nephrol. 22 (1): 1–4. doi:10.4103/0971-4065.91177. PMC 3263056. PMID 22279335.
  10. Meier P, Rossert J, Plouin PF, Burnier M (2007). “Atherosclerotic renovascular disease: beyond the renal artery stenosis”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 22 (4): 1002–6. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl784. PMID 17210599.



Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Laboratory Findings

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Landmark Trials | Future or Investigational Therapies


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH