Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Streptococcus pneumoniae

This page is about microbiologic aspects of the organism(s).  For clinical aspects of the disease, see Streptococcus pneumoniae infection.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Overview

Streptococcus pneumoniae, or pneumococcus, is a Gram-positive, alpha-hemolytic, facultative anaerobic member of the genus Streptococcus.[1] A significant human pathogenic bacterium, S. pneumoniae was recognized as a major cause of pneumonia in the late 19th century, and is the subject of many humoral immunity studies.

S. pneumoniae resides asymptomatically in the nasopharynx of healthy carriers. The respiratory tract, sinuses, and nasal cavity are the parts of host body that are usually infected. However, in susceptible individuals, such as elderly and immunocompromised people and children, the bacterium may become pathogenic, spread to other locations and cause disease. S. pneumoniae is the main cause of community acquired pneumonia and meningitis in children and the elderly, and of septicemia in HIV-infected persons. The methods of transmission include sneezing, coughing, and direct contact with an infected person.

Despite the name, the organism causes many types of pneumococcal infections other than pneumonia. These invasive pneumococcal diseases include bronchitis, rhinitis, acute sinusitis, otitis media, conjunctivitis, meningitis, bacteremia, sepsis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, endocarditis, peritonitis, pericarditis, cellulitis, and brain abscess.[2]

S. pneumoniae is one of the most common causes of bacterial meningitis in adults and young adults, along with Neisseria meningitidis, and is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in adults in the USA. It is also one of the top two isolates found in ear infection, otitis media.[3] Pneumococcal pneumonia is more common in the very young and the very old. It also is a major bacterium for invasive diseases like pneumonia and meningitis in South Asian children 12 years of age, though the evidence is of low quality and scarce.[4]

S. pneumoniae can be differentiated from Streptococcus viridans, some of which are also alpha-hemolytic, using an optochin test, as S. pneumoniae is optochin-sensitive. S. pneumoniae can also be distinguished based on its sensitivity to lysis by bile, the so-called “bile solubility test”. The encapsulated, Gram-positive coccoid bacteria have a distinctive morphology on Gram stain, lancet-shaped diplococci. They have a polysaccharide capsule that acts as a virulence factor for the organism; more than 90 different serotypes are known, and these types differ in virulence, prevalence, and extent of drug resistance.

History

History

In 1881, the organism, known later in 1886 as the pneumococcus[5] for its role as an [etiologic agent] of pneumonia, was first isolated simultaneously and independently by the U.S. Army physician George Sternberg[6] and the French chemist Louis Pasteur.[7]

The organism was termed Diplococcus pneumoniae from 1920[8] because of its characteristic appearance in Gram-stained sputum. It was renamed Streptococcus pneumoniae in 1974 because it was very similar to streptococci.[5][9]

S. pneumoniae played a central role in demonstrating genetic material consists of DNA. In 1928, Frederick Griffith demonstrated transformation of life, turning harmless pneumococcus into a lethal form by co-inoculating the live pneumococci into a mouse along with heat-killed, virulent pneumococci.[10] In 1944, Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty demonstrated the transforming factor in Griffith’s experiment was DNA, not protein, as was widely believed at the time.[11] Avery’s work marked the birth of the molecular era of genetics.[12]

Virulence Factors

Virulence Factors

S. pneumoniae expresses different virulence factors on its cell surface and inside the organism. These virulence factors contribute to some of the clinical manifestations during infection with S. pneumoniae.

  • Polysaccharide capsule -prevents phagocytosis by host immune cells by inhibiting C3b opsonization of the bacterial cells
  • Pneumolysin (Ply) -a 53-kDa protein that can cause lysis of host cells and activate complement
  • Autolysin (LytA) -activation of this protein lyses the bacteria releasing its internal contents (i.e. pneumolysin)
  • Hydrogen peroxide – causes damage to host cells (can cause apoptosis in neuronal cells during meningitis) and has bactericidal effects against competing bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus)[13]
  • Pili – hair-like structures that extend from the surface of many strains of S. pneumoniae. They contribute to colonization of upper respiratory tract and increase the formation of large amounts of TNF by the immune system during sepsis, raising the possibility of septic shock[14]
  • Choline binding protein A (CbpA) -an adhesin that can interact with carbohydrates on the cell surface of pulmonary epithelial cells
  • Protective Antigen (PspA) -can inhibit complement-mediated opsonization of pneumococci
Pathogenesis

Pathogenesis

S. pneumoniae is normally found in the nasopharynx of 5-10% of healthy adults, and 20-40% of healthy children. It can be found in higher amounts in certain environments, especially those where people are spending a great deal of time in close proximity to each other (day cares, army barracks). It attaches to nasopharyngeal cells through interaction of bacterial surface adhesins. This normal colonization can become infectious if the organisms are carried into areas such as the Eustachian tube or nasal sinuses where it can cause otitis media and sinusitis, respectively. Pneumonia occurs if the organisms are inhaled into the lungs and not cleared (again, viral infection, or smoking-induced ciliary paralysis might be contributing factors). Once the organism makes its way to a site where it is not normally found, it activates the complement protein group, stimulates cytokine production, and attracts white blood cells (specifically neutrophils). The organism’s polysaccharide capsule makes it resistant to phagocytosis, and if there is no pre-existing anticapsular antibody, alveolar macrophages cannot adequately kill the pneumococci. The organism spreads to the blood stream (where it can cause bacteremia) and is carried to the meninges, joint spaces, bones, and peritoneal cavity, and may result in meningitis, brain abscess, septic arthritis, or osteomyelitis.

S. pneumoniae has several virulence factors, including the polysaccharide capsule mentioned earlier, that help it evade a host’s immune system. It has pneumococcal surface proteins that inhibit complement-mediated opsonization, and it secretes IgA1 protease that will destroy secretory IgA produced by the body.

Humoral immunity

Humoral immunity

In the 19th century, it was demonstrated that immunization of rabbits with killed pneumococci protected them against subsequent challenge with viable pneumococci. Serum from immunized rabbits or from humans who had recovered from pneumococcal pneumonia also conferred protection. In the 20th century, the efficacy of immunization was demonstrated in South African miners.

It was discovered that the pneumococcus’s capsule made it resistant to phagocytosis, and in the 1920s it was shown that an antibody specific for capsular polysaccharide aided the killing of S. pneumoniae. In 1936, a pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine was used to abort an epidemic of pneumococcal pneumonia. In the 1940s, experiments on capsular transformation by pneumococci first identified DNA as the material that carries genetic information.

In 1900, it was recognized that different serovars of pneumococci exist, and that immunization with a given serovar did not protect against infection with other serovars. Since then over ninety serovars have been discovered, each with a unique polysaccharide capsule which can be identified by the quellung reaction. Because some of these serovars cause disease more commonly than others, it is possible to provide reasonable protection by immunizing with less than 90 serovars; the current vaccine contains 23 serovars (i.e., it is “23-valent”).

The serovars are numbered according to two systems: the American system, which numbers them in the order in which they were discovered, and the Danish system which groups them according to antigenic similarities.

Genetics

Genetics

The genome of S. pneumoniae is a closed, circular DNA structure that contains between 2.0 and 2.1 million base pairs, depending on the strain. It has a core set of 1553 genes, plus 154 genes in its virulome, which contribute to virulence, and 176 genes that maintain a noninvasive phenotype. Genetic information can vary up to 10% between strains.[15]

Transformation in S. pneumoniae

Transformation in S. pneumoniae

Natural bacterial transformation involves the transfer of DNA from one bacterium to another through the surrounding medium. Transformation is a complex, developmental process requiring energy, dependent on expression of numerous genes. In S. pneumoniae at least 23 genes are required. In order for a bacterium to bind, take up and recombine exogenous DNA into its chromosome it must enter a special physiological state, called competence.

Competence, in S. pneumoniae, is induced by DNA-damaging agents such as mitomycin C, a DNA inter-strand cross-linking agent, and the fluoroquinolone antibiotics norfloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, topoisomerase inhibitors that cause double-strand breaks.[16] Transformation protects S. pneumoniae against the bactericidal effect of mitomycin C.[17] Michod et al.[18] summarized evidence that induction of competence in S. pneumoniae is associated with increased resistance to oxidative stress and increased expression of the RecA protein, a key component of the recombinational repair machinery for removing DNA damages. On the basis of these findings, they suggested that transformation is an adaptation for repairing oxidative DNA damages. S. pneumoniae infection stimulates polymorphonuclear leukocytes (granulocyte) to produce an oxidative burst that is potentially lethal to the bacteria. The ability of S. pneumoniae to repair the oxidative DNA damages in its genome, caused by this host defense, likely contributes to this pathogen’s virulence.

Infection

Infection

S. pneumoniae is part of the normal upper respiratory tract flora, but, as with many natural flora, it can become pathogenic under the right conditions, like if the immune system of the host is suppressed. Invasins, such as pneumolysin, an anti-phagocytic capsule, various adhesins and immunogenic cell wall components are all major virulence factors.

Risk Factors

Risk Factors

The risk of pneumococcal infection is much increased in persons with impaired IgG synthesis, impaired phagocytosis, or defective clearance of pneumococci. In particular, the absence of a functional spleen, through congenital asplenia, splenectomy, or sickle-cell disease predisposes one to a more severe course of infection (Overwhelming post-splenectomy infection) and prevention measures are indicated (see asplenia).

Vaccine

Vaccine

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [1] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

A pneumococcal vaccine is a vaccine against Streptococcus pneumoniae.[1]

Types include:

Vaccination in the USA

In the USA, a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine vaccine (PCV 7) (e.g. Prevenar[2]) is recommended since 2000 for all children aged 2–23 months and for at-risk children aged 24–59 months. The normally 4-doses series is given at 2, 4, 6 & 12–14 months of age. Protection is good against deep pneumococcal infections (especially septicemia and meningitis). Similar 9-, 10-, and 13-valent vaccines have been tested. However, if a child is exposed to a serotype of pneumococcus that is not contained in the vaccine, he/she is not afforded any protection. This limitation, and the ability of capsular-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines to promote the spread of non-covered serotypes, has led to research into vaccines that would provide species-wide protection.

Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax is one brand) gives at least 85% protection in those under 55 years of age for five years or longer. Immunization is suggested for those at highest risk of infection, including those 65 years or older; generally the vaccine should be a single lifetime dose, as there is a high risk of side effects if repeated. The standard 23-valent vaccines are ineffective for children under two years old.

The current guidelines of the American College of Physicians call for administration of the immunization between ages 2 and 65 when indicated, or at age 65. If someone received the immunization before age 60, the guidelines call for a one-time revaccination.

Revaccination at periodic intervals is also indicated for those with other conditions such as asplenia or nephrotic syndrome.

Vaccination in the UK

It was announced in February 2006 that the UK government would introduce vaccination with the conjugate vaccine in children aged 2, 4 and 13 months.[3][4] This is expected to start on September 4,2006 and is to include changes to the immunisation programme in general.[5] In 2009, the European Medicines Agency approved the use of a 10-valent pneumcoccal conjugate vaccine for use in Europe.[6]

Vaccination worldwide

Pneumococcal vaccines Accelerated Development and Introduction Plan (PnemoADIP) is a program to accelerate the evaluation and access to new pneumococcal vaccines in the developing world. PneumoADIP is funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). Thirty GAVI countries have expressed interest in participating by 2010. PneumoADIP aims to save 5.4 million children by 2030.[7]

Vaccine research

Due to the geographic distribution of pneumococcal serotypes, additional research is needed to find the most efficacious vaccine for developing-world populations. In a previous study, the most common pneumococcal serotypes or groups from developed countries were found to be, in descending order, 14, 6, 19, 18, 9, 23, 7, 4, 1 and 15. In developing countries the order was 6, 14, 8, 5, 1, 19, 9, 23, 18, 15 and 7.[8] In order to further pneumococcal vaccine research and reduce childhood mortality, five countries and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation established a pilot Advance Market Commitment for pneumococal vaccines worth US$1.5 billion. Advance Market Committments are a a new approach to public health funding designed to stimulate the development and manufacture of vaccines for developing countries.[9]

There is currently research into producing vaccines than can be given into the nose rather than by injection.[10] [11] It is believed that this improves vaccine efficacy and also avoids the need for injection.

The development of serotype-specific anticapsular monoclonal antibodies has also been researched in recent years. These antibodies have been shown to prolong survival in a mouse model of pneumococcal infection characterized by a reduction in bacterial loads and a suppression of the host inflammatory response.[12][13] Additional pneumococcal vaccine research is taking place to find a vaccine that offers broad protection against pneumococcal disease.[14]

See Also

References

  1. Pneumococcal+Vaccines at the US National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
  2. E.M.E.A.:Prevenar – Annex I: Summary of Product Characteristics
  3. “Children to be given new vaccine” BBC News, February 08, 2006, retrieved August 25, 2006
  4. “Pneumococcal vaccine added to the childhood immunisation programme” February 08, 2006
  5. “Changes to the immunisation programme in the UK” Meningitis Research Foundation, retrieved August 25, 2006
  6. Synflorix, GlaxoSmithKline’s pneumococcal vaccine receives European authorisation. http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10039.htm.
  7. “PneumoADIP website”
  8. Sniadack DH, Schwartz B, Lipman H, et al. Potential interventions for the prevention of childhood pneumonia: geographic and temporal differences in serotype and serogroup distribution of sterile site pneumococcal isolates from children–implications for vaccine strategies. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1995;14(6):503-510.
  9. GAVI Alliance, World Bank. Saving Lives with New Vaccines: Advance Market Commitments. http://www.vaccineamc.org/files/AMC_FactSheet_v2.pdf.
  10. Hanniffy SB, Carter AT, Hitchin E, Wellsa JM. (2007). “Mucosal delivery of a Pneumococcal vaccine using Lactococcus lactis affords protection against respiratory infection” ( – Scholar search). J Infect Dis. 195: 185&ndash, 193. doi:10.1086/509807.
  11. Malley R. Lipsitch M, Stack A, Saladino R, Fleisher G, Pelton S, Thompson C, Briles D, Anderson P. (2001). “Intranasal immunization with killed unencapsulated whole cells prevents colonization and invasive disease by capsulated pneumococci”. Infect Immun. 69: 4870&ndash, 4873. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.8.4870-4873.2001. PMID 11447162.
  12. Burns T, Abadi M, Pirofski L (2005). “Modulation of the lung inflammatory response to serotype 8 pneumococcal infection by a human immunoglobulin m monoclonal antibody to serotype 8 capsular polysaccharide”. Infect Immun. 73 (8): 4530&ndash, 8. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.8.4530-4538.2005. PMID 16040964.
  13. Fabrizio K, Groner A, Boes M, Pirofski L. “A Human Monoclonal IgM Reduces Bacteremia and Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Systemic Pneumococcal Infection”. Clin Vaccine Immunol. PMID 17301214.
  14. World Health Organization. Streptococcus pneumoniae. http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/ari/en/index6.html.

Template:Vaccines

Template:SIB Template:WH Template:WS

Interaction with Haemophilus influenzae

Interaction with Haemophilus influenzae

Both Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) and S. pneumoniae can be found in the human upper respiratory system. A study of competition in vitro revealed S. pneumoniae overpowered H. influenzae by attacking it with hydrogen peroxide.[19]

When both bacteria are placed together into the nasal cavity of a mouse, within 2 weeks, only H. influenzae survives. When both are placed separately into a nasal cavity, each one survives. Upon examining the upper respiratory tissue from mice exposed to both bacteria, an extraordinarily large number of neutrophil immune cells were found. In mice exposed to only one bacterium, the cells were not present.

Lab tests show neutrophils that were exposed to already-dead H. influenzae were more aggressive in attacking S. pneumoniae than unexposed neutrophils. Exposure to killed H. influenzae had no effect on live H. influenzae.

Two scenarios may be responsible for this response:

  1. When H. influenzae is attacked by S. pneumoniae, it signals the immune system to attack the S. pneumoniae
  2. The combination of the two species sets off an immune system alarm that is not set off by either species individually.

It is unclear why H. influenzae is not affected by the immune system response.[20]

See also

See also

References

References

  1. Ryan KJ; Ray CG (editors) (2004). Sherris Medical Microbiology. McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-8385-8529-9.
  2. Siemieniuk, Reed A.C. (Nov 2011). “The persisting burden of invasive pneumococcal disease in HIV patients: an observational cohort study”. BMC Infectious Diseases. 11: 314. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-314. PMC 3226630. PMID 22078162. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  3. Dagan R (2000). “Treatment of acute otitis media—challenges in the era of antibiotic resistance”. Vaccine. 19 (Suppl 1): S9–S16. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00272-3. PMID 11163457.
  4. Jaiswal, Nishant; Singh, Meenu; Thumburu, Kiran Kumar; Bharti, Bhavneet; Agarwal, Amit; Kumar, Ajay; Kaur, Harpreet; Chadha, Neelima; et al. (5 May 2014). “Burden of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Children Aged 1 Month to 12 Years Living in South Asia: A Systematic Review”. PLoS ONE. 9 (5): e96282. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096282.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Plotkin, SA; Orenstein, W; Offit, PA (September 22, 2012). Vaccines. Elsevier – Saunders. p. 542. ISBN 978-1455700905. Retrieved July 2, 2015.
  6. Sternberg, George Miller (30 April 1881). “A fatal form of septicaemia in the rabbit produced by the subcutaneous injection of human saliva. An experimental research”. Bulletin of the National Board of Health. Baltimore, Maryland.
  7. Pasteur, Louis (1881). “Sur une maladie nouvelle provoquée par la salive d’un enfant mort de rage”. Acad. D. Sc. De Paris. Paris, France. 92: 159.
  8. Winslow, C., and J. Broadhurst (1920). “The Families and Genera of the Bacteria: Final Report of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types”. J Bacteriol. 5 (3): 191–229. PMC 378870. PMID 16558872.
  9. Wainer H (2014). Medical Illuminations: Using Evidence, Visualization and Statistical Thinking to Improve Healthcare. Oxford University Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0199668793. Retrieved July 4, 2015.
  10. Griffith F (January 1928). “The Significance of Pneumococcal Types” (PDF). Journal of Hygiene. Cambridge University Press. 27 (2): 113–159. doi:10.1017/S0022172400031879. PMC 2167760. Retrieved July 3, 2015.
  11. Avery OT, MacLeod CM, and McCarty M (1944). “Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types: induction of transformation by a desoxyribonucleic acid fraction isolated from pneumococcus type III”. J Exp Med. 79 (2): 137–158. doi:10.1084/jem.79.2.137. PMC 2135445. PMID 19871359.
  12. Lederberg J (1994). “The Transformation of Genetics by DNA: An Anniversary Celebration of Avery, Macleod and Mccarty (1944)”. Genetics. 136 (2): 423&ndash, 6. PMC 1205797. PMID 8150273.
  13. Pericone, Christopher D., Overweg, Karin, Hermans, Peter W. M., Weiser, Jeffrey N. (2000). “Inhibitory and Bactericidal Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide Production by Streptococcus pneumoniae on Other Inhabitants of the Upper Respiratory Tract”. Infect Immun. 68 (7): 3990–3997. PMID 10858213.
  14. Barocchi M, Ries J, Zogaj X, Hemsley C, Albiger B, Kanth A, Dahlberg S, Fernebro J, Moschioni M, Masignani V, Hultenby K, Taddei A, Beiter K, Wartha F, von Euler A, Covacci A, Holden D, Normark S, Rappuoli R, Henriques-Normark B (2006). “A pneumococcal pilus influences virulence and host inflammatory responses”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103 (8): 2857–2862. PMID 16481624.
  15. van der Poll T, Opal SM (2009). “Pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia”. Lancet. 374 (9700): 1543–56. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61114-4. PMID 19880020.
  16. Claverys JP, Prudhomme M, Martin B (2006). “Induction of competence regulons as a general response to stress in gram-positive bacteria”. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60: 451–75. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142139. PMID 16771651.
  17. Engelmoer DJ, Rozen DE (December 2011). “Competence increases survival during stress in Streptococcus pneumoniae”. Evolution. 65 (12): 3475–85. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01402.x. PMID 22133219.
  18. Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM (May 2008). “Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens”. Infect. Genet. Evol. 8 (3): 267–85. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002. PMID 18295550.http://www.hummingbirds.arizona.edu/Faculty/Michod/Downloads/IGE%20review%20sex.pdf
  19. Pericone, Christopher D., Overweg, Karin, Hermans, Peter W. M., Weiser, Jeffrey N. (2000). “Inhibitory and Bactericidal Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide Production by Streptococcus pneumoniae on Other Inhabitants of the Upper Respiratory Tract”. Infect Immun. 68 (7): 3990&ndash, 3997. doi:10.1128/IAI.68.7.3990-3997.2000. PMC 101678. PMID 10858213.
  20. Lysenko ES, Ratner AJ, Nelson AL, Weiser JN (2005). “The Role of Innate Immune Responses in the Outcome of Interspecies Competition for Colonization of Mucosal Surfaces”. PLoS Pathog. 1 (1): e1. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0010001. PMC 1238736. PMID 16201010. Full text
External links

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH