
Health Dictionary
Reliable, easy-to-read patient information on common medical conditions — written in plain language, free of jargon, and grounded in current evidence. Browse the most frequent diagnoses, understand what they mean for everyday life, and learn which steps and questions help you have a focused conversation with your doctor.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia other diagnostic studies
Introduction
Overview
Overview
Other diagnostic studies for acute lymphoblastic leukemia include cytogenetics, bone marrow biopsy, flow cytometry, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and flouroscence insitu hybridization (FISH).
Cytogenetics
Cytogenetics
- In Cytogenetics the following establishes whether the “blast” cells began from the B lymphocytes or T lymphocytes[1]
- DNA testing can establish how aggressive the disease is; different mutations have been associated with shorter or longer survival[3]
Biopsy
Biopsy
- A biopsy is the only sure way to know whether leukemia cells are in the bone marrow
- Before the sample is taken, local anesthesia is used to numb the area. This helps reduce the pain.
- Bone marrow from the hipbone or another large bone is taken as biopsy.[4]
- On biopsy the following is seen:[5]
- A bone marrow biopsy and aspirate are routinely performed even in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia to determine the extent of marrow involvement
- Malignant cells should be sent for conventional cytogenetic studies, as detection of the Ph1 t(9;22), myc gene rearrangements (in Burkitt), and MLL gene rearrangements add important prognostic information[6]
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry
RT-PCR and FISH
RT-PCR and FISH
References
References
- ↑ Hakeem A, Shiekh AA, Bhat GM, Lone AR (2015). “Prognostification of ALL by Cytogenetics”. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 31 (3): 322–31. doi:10.1007/s12288-014-0483-0. PMC 4465518. PMID 26085716.
- ↑ Motlló C, Ribera JM, Morgades M, Granada I, Montesinos P, Mercadal S; et al. (2018). “Frequency and prognostic significance of additional cytogenetic abnormalities to the Philadelphia chromosome in young and older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. Leuk Lymphoma. 59 (1): 146–154. doi:10.1080/10428194.2017.1326596. PMID 28554259.
- ↑ Woo JS, Alberti MO, Tirado CA (2014). “Childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a genetic update”. Exp Hematol Oncol. 3: 16. doi:10.1186/2162-3619-3-16. PMC 4063430. PMID 24949228.
- ↑ Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th EditioN, Chapter 97. Malignancies of Lymphoid Cells. Clinical Features, Treatment, and Prognosis of Specific Lymphoid Malignancies.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Kröber SM, Greschniok A, Kaiserling E, Horny HP (2000). “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: correlation between morphological/immunohistochemical and molecular biological findings in bone marrow biopsy specimens”. Mol Pathol. 53 (2): 83–7. PMC 1186910. PMID 10889907.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 “National Cancer Institute”.
- ↑ “National Cancer Institute”.
- ↑ Chiaretti S, Zini G, Bassan R (2014). “Diagnosis and subclassification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 6 (1): e2014073. doi:10.4084/MJHID.2014.073. PMC 4235437. PMID 25408859.
- ↑ Kamoda Y, Izumi K, Iioka F, Akasaka T, Nakamura F, Kishimori C; et al. (2016). “Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Separated into Two Subgroups Associated with Survival by BCR-ABL Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Segmented Cell Nuclei: Report from a Single Institution”. Acta Haematol. 136 (3): 157–66. doi:10.1159/000445972. PMID 27537935.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2] Carlos A Lopez, M.D. [3]
