Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Burkitt's lymphoma

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Umar Ahmad, M.D.[2] Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [3]

Synonyms and keywords:: Burkitt’s tumor; Burkitt lymphoma; Burkitt’s type non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; Malignant lymphoma, Burkitt’s type

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2]

Overview

Burkitt’s lymphoma (“Burkitt’s tumor”, or “Malignant lymphoma, Burkitt’s type”) is a cancer of the lymphatic system (in particular, B lymphocytes). Burkitt’s lymphoma was first described by Denis Parsons Burkitt, a surgeon, in 1958 while working in equatorial Africa. Burkitt’s lymphoma may be classified according to WHO classification into 3 clinical variants: endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma, sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma, and immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma includes c-myc. On gross pathology, ulceration and discharge are characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, “starry sky” appearance is characteristic finding of Burkitt’s lymphoma. There are no established causes for Burkitt’s lymphoma. Burkitt’s lymphoma must be differentiated from other diseases such as Hodgkin’s lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, Mucosa-Associated Lymphatic Tissue lymphoma (MALT), small cell lymphocytic lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Burkitt’s lymphoma is a common disease that tends to affect children or young adults. Males are more commonly affected with Burkitt’s lymphoma than females. Burkitt’s lymphoma usually affects individuals of the African race. Common risk factors in the development of Burkitt’s lymphoma may be HIV/AIDS and post-transplant immunosuppression. According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Burkitt’s lymphoma. The prognosis varies with the age, children have the most favorable prognosis. Burkitt’s lymphoma in children is associated with a 5 year survival rate of 90%. The presence of metastasis in bone marrow or CNS is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma. According to the Murphy staging system, there are four stages of Burkitt’s lymphoma based on the number of nodes and extra nodal involvement. Laboratory tests for Burkitt’s lymphoma include complete blood count (CBC), blood chemistry studies, immuno histochemistry, HIV blood test, flow cytometric analysis, and cytogenetics. Chest and knee x ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. CT and MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lymph node or extra nodal tissue biopsy is diagnostic of Burkitt’s lymphoma. PET and bone scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Other diagnostic studies for the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma include bone marrow biopsy and spinal fluid examination. The predominant therapy for Burkitt’s lymphoma is chemotherapy. Adjunctive immunotherapy and stem cell transplantation may be required. Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Historical Perspective

Burkitt’s lymphoma was first described by Denis Parsons Burkitt, a surgeon, in 1958 while working in equatorial Africa.

Classification

Burkitt’s lymphoma may be classified according to WHO classification into 3 clinical variants: endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma, sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma, and immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Pathophysiology

The c-myc gene involved in the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. On gross pathology, ulceration and discharge are characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, “starry sky” appearance is a characteristic finding of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Causes

There are no established causes for Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Differential diagnosis

Burkitt’s lymphoma must be differentiated from other diseases such as Hodgkin’s lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, Mucosa-Associated Lymphatic Tissue lymphoma (MALT), small cell lymphocytic lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Epidemiology and Demographics

Burkitt’s lymphoma is a common disease that tends to affect children or young adults. Males are more commonly affected with Burkitt’s lymphoma than females. Burkitt’s lymphoma usually affects individuals of the African race.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of Burkitt’s lymphoma may be HIV/AIDS and post-transplant immunosuppression.

Screening

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Prognosis

The prognosis varies with the age, children have the most favorable prognosis. Burkitt’s lymphoma in children is associated with a 5 year survival rate of 90%. The presence of metastasis in bone marrow or CNS is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Diagnosis

Staging

According to the Murphy staging system, there are four stages of Burkitt’s lymphoma based on the number of nodes and extra nodal involvement.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory tests for Burkitt’s lymphoma include complete blood count (CBC), blood chemistry studies, immuno histochemistry, HIV blood test, flow cytometric analysis, and cytogenetics.

X Ray Findings

Chest and knee x ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

CT

Chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

MRI

MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Biopsy

Lymph node or extra nodal tissue biopsy is diagnostic of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Other Imaging Studies

PET and bone scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Other diagnostic studies

Other diagnostic studies for the diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma include bone marrow biopsy and spinal fluid examination.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The predominant therapy for Burkitt’s lymphoma is chemotherapy. Adjunctive immunotherapy and stem cell transplantation may be required.

Surgery

Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

References

Template:Chromosomal abnormalities


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[3]

Overview

Burkitt’s lymphoma was first discovered by Denis Parsons Burkitt, an Irish surgeon, in 1958 while working in Africa.

Historical Perspective

  • Burkitt’s lymphoma was first discovered by Denis Parsons Burkitt, an Irish surgeon, in 1958 while working in Africa.[1]
  • In 1961 Burkitt and O’Connor detailed the features of the clinical syndrome known as Burkitt’s lymphoma. Soon afterward, Wright discovered that this lymphoma can be distinguished from other forms of lymphomas based on key histopathological features.[2]

References

  1. Burkitt D (1958). “A sarcoma involving the jaws in African children”. The British journal of surgery. 46 (197): 218–23. doi:10.1002/bjs.18004619704. PMID 13628987.
  2. Ortiz-Hidalgo C (1994). “A short history of Hodgkin’s disease and Burkitt’s lymphoma”. Am J Clin Pathol. 101 (4 Suppl 1): S27–33. PMID 8154453.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2]

Overview

Burkitt’s lymphoma may be classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification into 3 clinical variants. The clinical variants are endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma, sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma, and immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Classification

Burkitt’s lymphoma may be classified according to WHO classification into 3 clinical variants:

  • Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma [1]
  • Sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma[2]
  • Immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma[3]

It is almost impossible to differentiate these three clinical variants based on histology (i.e. microscopic appearance) or immunophenotype.

Classification Based on The Geographic Distribution and Clinical Presentation
Name Description
Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma

(African Burkitt’s lymphoma)

Sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma

(Non-African or Non-endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma)

Immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma
  • The presentation of patients with immunodeficiency-related Burkitt’s lymphoma is often accompanied by signs or symptoms related to the underlying immunodeficiency which can be the following:
  • Immunodeficiency-related cases frequently often involve lymph nodes, bone marrow, and CNS

References

  1. Tao Q, Robertson KD, Manns A, Hildesheim A, Ambinder RF (1998). “Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma: molecular analysis of primary tumor tissue”. Blood. 91 (4): 1373–81. PMID 9454768.
  2. Ng JY, Thompson RJ, Lam A, Nigam S (2018). “Sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma masquerading as an intussuscepted Meckel’s diverticulum in a 9-year-old child”. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. doi:10.1136/bcr-2018-224333. PMID 30042102.
  3. Linke-Serinsöz E, Fend F, Quintanilla-Martinez L (2017). “Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) related lymphomas, pathology view point”. Semin Diagn Pathol. 34 (4): 352–363. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2017.04.003. PMID 28506687.

Template:Chromosomal abnormalities


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivali Marketkar, M.B.B.S. [2] Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [3], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[4]

Overview

The c-myc gene is involved in the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. On gross pathology, ulceration and discharge are characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, “starry sky” appearance is a characteristic finding of Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Pathology

Burkitt’s lymphoma is an aggressive and rapidly growing tumor.[1]. It can present in a wide variety of locations which include:

Genetics

Translocation of chromosome 8 myc locus with 3 possible partners (accounting for 90% of translocations):[2]

  • The Ig heavy chain region on chromosome 14: t(8;14)
  • The kappa light chain locus on chromosome 2: t(2;8)
  • The lambda light chain locus on chromosome 22: t(8;22)
  • WHO committees suggest the following:
  • If morphologic features are intermediate, diagnosis of Burkitt’s should only be made if the Ki-67 fraction of viable cells is at least 99 percent
  • If morphologic features suggest diffuse large B cell lymphoma, but have with a high proliferation fraction or t(8;14), they should be classified as diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Gene targets

  • Unique genetic alterations promote cell survival in Burkitt’s lymphoma, distinct from other types of lymphoma[3]
  • These TCF3 and ID3 gene mutations in Burkitt’s correspond to a cell survival pathway that may be found to be amenable to targeted therapy.[4]

MicroRNA expression

  • In 2014, it was described that short non-coding RNAs named microRNAs (miRNAs) have important functions in lymphoma biology
  • In malignant B cells miRNAs participate in pathways fundamental to B cell development like B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, B cell migration/adhesion, cell-cell interactions in immune niches, and the production and class-switching of immunoglobulins[5]
  • MiRNAs influences B cells in the following manner:[5]
    • Maturation
    • Generation of marginal zone
    • Follicular
    • Plasma
    • Memory B cells

Immunohistochemistry

The tumor cells in Burkitt lymphoma generally strongly express markers of B cell differentiation and they are the following:[6]

  • (CD19
  • CD20
  • CD22)
  • CD10
  • BCL6
  • The tumor cells are generally negative for BCL2 and TdT. The high mitotic activity of Burkitt’s lymphoma is confirmed by nearly 100% of the cells staining positive for Ki67.[7]

Malignant B cell characteristics

Malignant B cells have identical DNA recombinations of the V(D)J region of the immunoglobin genes and there characteristics are the following: [8]

  • This means that no increase in specificity of antibody molecules is occurring in the malignant cells
  • These malignant cells are thus clonal populations and can be assayed for by using DNA probes specific for the regions where recombination is expected
  • Normal DNA will be characterized by two high concentration of identical germ line DNA V(D)J regions and endless, likely undetectable, non-germline Ig V(D)J DNA
  • Lymphoma cells have an additional high concentration of V(D)J DNA that is unlike the germ line, indicating clonal populations of B Cells that are not undifferentiated B cells (germ line DNA cells)
  • Assays typically use the process of electrophoresis and southern blot analysis to determine the existence of these characteristics

Gross Pathology

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma include:[10]

  • Medium-sized (~1.5-2x the size of a RBC) with uniform size (“monotonous”) — key feature (i.e. tumor nuclei size similar to that of histiocytes or endothelial cells)
  • Round nucleus
  • Small nucleoli
  • Relatively abundant cytoplasm (basophilic)
  • Brisk mitotic rate and apoptotic activity
  • Cellular outline usually appears squared off
  • “Starry-sky pattern”:
  • The stars in the pattern are tingible-body macrophages (macrophages containing apoptotic tumor cells)
  • The tumour cells are the sky


Video

{{#ev:youtube|CwsQ-wIbbK8}}

References

  1. Burkitt lymphoma. Radiopedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/burkitt-lymphoma Accessed on October,5 2015
  2. Burkitt’s Lymphoma. Wikibooks. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Radiation_Oncology/NHL/Burkitt_lymphoma#Pathology Accessed on October,5 2015
  3. “NIH study shows Burkitt lymphoma is molecularly distinct from other lymphomas”. National Cancer Institute.
  4. Staudt L, et al. Burkitt Lymphoma Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Targets from Structural and Functional Genomics. Nature. August 12, 2012 doi:10.1038/nature11378
  5. 5.0 5.1 Musilova, K; Mraz, M (2014). “MicroRNAs in B cell lymphomas: How a complex biology gets more complex”. Leukemia. doi:10.1038/leu.2014.351. PMID 25541152.
  6. Chuang, Shih-Sung; Ye, Hongtao; Du, Ming-Qing; Lu, Chin-Li; Dogan, Ahmet; Hsieh, Pin-Pen; Huang, Wan-Ting; Jung, Yun-Chih (2007). “Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Burkitt Lymphoma From Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Very High Proliferation Index and With or Without a Starry-Sky Pattern”. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 128 (4): 558–564. doi:10.1309/EQJR3D3V0CCQGP04. ISSN 0002-9173.
  7. Steven H Swerdlow (2008). WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Lyon, France : International Agency for Research on Cancer. ISBN 978-92-832-2431-0.
  8. Ferry, J. A. (2006). “Burkitt’s Lymphoma: Clinicopathologic Features and Differential Diagnosis”. The Oncologist. 11 (4): 375–383. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-4-375. ISSN 1083-7159.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Burkitt’s lymphoma. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burkitt%27s_lymphomaAccessed on October 5, 2015
  10. Bellan C, Lazzi S, De Falco G, Nyongo A, Giordano A, Leoncini L (2003). “Burkitt’s lymphoma: new insights into molecular pathogenesis”. J. Clin. Pathol. 56 (3): 188–92. PMC 1769902. PMID 12610094. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:Chromosomal abnormalities


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Assistant Editor-in-Chief: Soumya Sachdeva, Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2]

Overview

There are no established causes for Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Causes

There are no established causes for Burkitt’s lymphoma.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Burkitt’s lymphoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Assistant Editor-in-Chief: Soumya Sachdeva, Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[3]

Overview

Burkitt’s lymphoma must be differentiated from other diseases such as Hodgkin’s lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, Mucosa-Associated Lymphatic Tissue lymphoma (MALT), small cell lymphocytic lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Differentiating Burkitt’s lymphoma from other Diseases

Burkitt’s lymphoma must be differentiated from other diseases such as:[1]

Differential Diagnosis of Sporadic Burkitt’s Lymphoma

S.No. Disease Symptoms Signs Diagnosis Comments
Abdominal Pain Hematuria Headache Abdominal mass Abdominal tenderness Ultrasonography CT scan Histology
1. Wilms tumor + + + +
  • Wilms tumor has a triphasic appearance.
  • It is comprised of 3 types of cells:
  • All the 3 types are not required for the diagnosis of Wilms tumor.
  • Primitive tubules and glomeruli are often seen comprised of neoplastic cells.
  • Beckwith and Palmer reported in NWTS the different histopathologic types of Wilms tumor to categorize them based on prognosis.[5]
2. Renal cell carcinoma + + +/- +
  • Ultrasound (US) may be helpful when CT scan results are equivocal. It is noteworthy to mention that not all renal cell carcinomas are detectable on ultrasound.
Both CT and MRI may be used to detect neoplastic masses that may define renal cell carcinoma or metastasis of the primary cancer. CT scan and use of intravenous (IV) contrast is generally used for work-up and follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma. The histological pattern of renal cell carcinoma depends whether it is papillary, chromophobe or collecting duct renal cell carcinoma.
3. Rhabdoid kidney disease + + +
  • CT scan may be diagnostic of malignant rhabdoid tumor. Findings on CT scan suggestive of malignant rhabdoid tumor include a large, heterogenous, centrally located mass, which is lobulated with individual lobules separated by intervening areas of decreased attenuation, relating to either previous hemorrhage or necrosis. Enhancement is similarly heterogeneous. Calcification is relatively common, observed in 20-50% of cases and is typically linear and tends to outline tumor lobules.
  • Malignant rhabdoid tumor is characterized by the round blue tumor cells of high cellularity composed of atypical cells with eccentric nuclei, small nucleoli, and abundant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm with frequent mitotic figures.
4. Polycystic kidney disease + + + (from hypertension) +

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on an ultrasound diagnostic of polycystic kidney disease include:[6][7]

  • At least three unilateral or bilateral cysts in patients 15 – 39 years old
  • Atleast two cysts in each kidney in patients 40 – 59 years old
  • Atleast four cysts in each kidney in patients 60 years of age or older

Renal CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on CT scan diagnostic of ADPKD include:

  • Numerous renal cysts of varying size and shape with little intervening parenchyma with water attenuation and very thin wall.
  • Reduction in sinus fat due to expansion of the cortex
  • Occasional complex cysts with hyperdense appearance, with possible septations or calcifications
  • Multiple homogeneous and hypoattenuating cystic lesions in the liver in patients with liver involvement
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, thickening and lamellation of tubular basement membranes, microcysts and negative immunofluorescence for complement and immunoglobulin are characteristic findings of ADPKD.[8][9][10][11]
5. Pheochromocytoma + (as a part of the hypertension paroxysm)
  • CT is the preferred imaging modality for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
The following findings may be observed on CT scan:[12]
  • On microscopic pathology, Pheochromocytoma typically demonstrates a nesting (Zellballen) pattern on microscopy. This pattern is composed of well-defined clusters of tumor cells containing eosinophilic cytoplasm separated by fibrovascular stroma.
6. Burkitt lymphoma +/- (in non-endemic or sporadic form of the disease)
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma include:[17]
  • Medium-sized (~1.5-2x the size of a RBC) with uniform size (“monotonous”) — key feature (i.e. tumor nuclei size similar to that of histiocytes or endothelial cells)
  • Round nucleus
  • Small nucleoli
  • Relatively abundant cytoplasm (basophilic)
  • Brisk mitotic rate and apoptotic activity
  • Cellular outline usually appears squared off
  • “Starry-sky pattern”:
  • The stars in the pattern are tingible-body macrophages (macrophages containing apoptotic tumor cells.
  • The tumour cells are the sky
7. Intussusception + +/- +
  • Ultrasound is the gold standard imaging modality used to diagnose intussusception[18]
    • Target or doughnut sign[19]
      • Edematous intussuscipien forms an external ring around the centrally located intussusceptum
      • Target sign is usually seen in right lower quadrant
    • Layers of intussusception forms pseudo-kidney appearance on the transverse view
  • CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of intussusception. CT scan maybe used when other image modalities like x-ray and ultrasound have not given positive results but suspicion of intussusception is high.
  • Intussusception occurs if there is an imbalance between the longitudinal and radial smooth muscle forces of intestine that maintain its normal structure. This imbalance leads to a segment of intestine to invaginate into another segment and cause entero-enteral intussusception. Etiology of intussusception is either idiopathic or pathologic (lead point). 
8. Hydronephrosis + +/- + (CVA tenderness in case of pyelonephritis)
  • In the case of renal colic (one sided loin pain usually accompanied by a trace of blood in the urine) the initial investigation is usually an intravenous urogram. This has the advantage of showing whether there is any obstruction of flow of urine causing hydronephrosis as well as demonstrating the function of the other kidney. Many stones are not visible on plain x ray or IVU but 99% of stones are visible on CT and therefore CT is becoming a common choice of initial investigation.
  • The kidney undergoes extensive dilation with atrophy and thinning of the renal cortex.
9. Dysplastic kidney N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

MCDK is usually diagnosed by ultrasound examination before birth.

  • Mass of non-communicating cysts of variable size.
  • Unlike severe hydronephrosis, in which the largest cystic structure (the renal pelvis) lies in a central location and is surrounded by dilated calices, in multicystic dysplastic kidney the cyst distribution shows no recognizable pattern.
  • Dysplastic, echogenic parenchyma may be visible between the cysts, but no normal renal parenchyma is seen.
  • MCKD can be discovered accidentally on CT scan.
  • CT scan shows myltiple cysts with absence of renal parenchyma.
  • MCKD is the result of abnormal differentiation of the renal parenchyma.
10. Pediatric Neuroblastoma + +/- +/-
  • CT scan is the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma.[21]
  • On CT scan, neuroblastoma is characterized by:[22]
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis the presence of round blue cells separated by thin fibrous septa are characteristic findings of neuroblastoma.
  • Other findings of neuroblastoma on light microscopy may include:[23]
  • Homer-Wright rosettes (rosettes with a small meshwork of fibers at the center)
  • Neuropil-like stroma (paucicellular stroma with a cotton candy-like appearance)
11. Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma + +/- +/- +/- On CT scan, rhabdomyosarocma is characterized by:
  • Soft tissue density
  • Some enhancement with contrast
  • Adjacent bony destruction (over 20% of cases)
12. Mesoblastic nephroma + + +
  • Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • Mesoblastic nephroma may presents as a well-defined mass with low-level homogeneous echoes.[24]
  • The presence of concentric echogenic and hypoechoic rings can be a helpful diagnostic feature of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • Findings on CT scan suggestive of mesoblastic nephroma include:
  • Solid hypoattenuating renal lesion
  • Variable contrast enhancement
  • No calcification

Classic mesoblastic nephroma

Cellular mesoblastic nephroma

  • Plump cells with vesicular nuclei
  • Well-defined border
  • Mitotically active

Mixed mesoblastic nephroma

  • Both classic pattern and cellular pattern areas are present
Most common renal tumor that occurs in 1st month of life

Differential Diagnosis of Endemic Burkitt’s Lymphoma

Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma typically presents as a cervico-facial mass and must be differentiated from other diseases that may present as a cervico-facial mass such as salivary glands tumors, sialolithiasis, human immunodeficiency virus, radiation, and systemic diseases such as, sarcoidosis, and sjögren’s syndrome.[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]

Diseases Symptoms and sign Laboratory Findings Other Findings
Onset Unilateral/Bilateral Pain Swelling Tenderness Purulent discharge Common site of involvement ESR Leukocytosis
Sialolithiasis Acute Unilateral + + + Submandibular gland ↑/NL ↑/NL Radio-opaque in X-ray
Acute bacterial sialadenitis Acute Unilateral + + + + Parotid Other sign of infection may be present
Chronic bacterial sialadenitis Chronic Unilateral + + +/- Parotid Other sign of infection may be present
Viral sialadenitis Acute Bilateral + + + Parotid Coryza symptoms
Human immunodeficiency virus Acute Bilateral + + Parotid NL NL Other systemic findings of HIV/ check ELISA
 Radiation sialadenitis Acute Unilateral + + + Depends on the treatment field NL NL History of radiation in the salivary gland site
Salivary gland tumors Subacute Unilateral + Parotid ↑/NL ↑/NL Advance age
Sarcoidosis Gradual Bilateral + Parotid Systemic findings in other organs
Sjögren’s syndrome Gradual Bilateral +/- + Parotid or submandibular glands ↑/NL ↑/NL Dry eye/dry mouth
Malnutrition Gradual Bilateral +/- + Parotid NL NL Systemic findings in other organs

Differentials Based on Cell Surface Markers

Based on the expression of cell surface markers, the table below differentiates Burkitt’s lymphoma from other diseases that cause similar clinical presentations:[33]

Differential Diagnosis Surface Immunoglobulin CD5 CD22/FMC7 CD23 CD79b CD103

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Weakly positive

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive/Negative

Prolymphocytic leukemia

Strongly positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Hairy cell leukemia

Strongly positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive/Negative

Positive

Mantle cell lymphoma

Positive

Positive

Strongly positive

Negative

Strongly positive

Negative

Follicular lymphoma

Strongly positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Strongly positive

Negative

References

  1. Chen M, Yang JL, Zhao S, Liu WP, Li GD, Ye YX; et al. (2018). “[Diagnostic and therapeutic values of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in B-cell lymphomas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 604 cases]”. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 47 (12): 920–925. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.12.005. PMID 30522172.
  2. Hartman DS, Sanders RC (April 1982). “Wilms’ tumor versus neuroblastoma: usefulness of ultrasound in differentiation”. J Ultrasound Med. 1 (3): 117–22. PMID 6152936.
  3. De Campo JF (1986). “Ultrasound of Wilms’ tumor”. Pediatr Radiol. 16 (1): 21–4. PMID 3003660.
  4. Cahan LD (1985). “Failure of encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis procedure in moyamoya disease”. Pediatr Neurosci. 12 (1): 58–62. PMID 4080660.
  5. Jolly RD, Stellwagen E, Babul J, Vodkaĭlo LV, Titov VL, Moldomusaev DM, Maianskiĭ AN (November 1975). “Mannosidosis of Angus Cattle: a prototype control program for some genetic diseases”. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 19 (23): 1–21. PMID 1978.
  6. Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Eckardt KU, Gansevoort RT, Harris T, Horie S, Kasiske BL, Odland D, Pei Y, Perrone RD, Pirson Y, Schrier RW, Torra R, Torres VE, Watnick T, Wheeler DC (July 2015). “Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): executive summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference”. Kidney Int. 88 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1038/ki.2015.59. PMC 4913350. PMID 25786098.
  7. Pei Y, Obaji J, Dupuis A, Paterson AD, Magistroni R, Dicks E, Parfrey P, Cramer B, Coto E, Torra R, San Millan JL, Gibson R, Breuning M, Peters D, Ravine D (January 2009). “Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis of ADPKD”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20 (1): 205–12. doi:10.1681/ASN.2008050507. PMC 2615723. PMID 18945943.
  8. Stavrou C, Koptides M, Tombazos C, Psara E, Patsias C, Zouvani I, Kyriacou K, Hildebrandt F, Christofides T, Pierides A, Deltas CC (October 2002). “Autosomal-dominant medullary cystic kidney disease type 1: clinical and molecular findings in six large Cypriot families”. Kidney Int. 62 (4): 1385–94. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid581.x. PMID 12234310.
  9. Bleyer AJ, Kmoch S, Antignac C, Robins V, Kidd K, Kelsoe JR, Hladik G, Klemmer P, Knohl SJ, Scheinman SJ, Vo N, Santi A, Harris A, Canaday O, Weller N, Hulick PJ, Vogel K, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Tuazon J, Deltas C, Somers D, Megarbane A, Kimmel PL, Sperati CJ, Orr-Urtreger A, Ben-Shachar S, Waugh DA, McGinn S, Bleyer AJ, Hodanová K, Vylet’al P, Živná M, Hart TC, Hart PS (March 2014). “Variable clinical presentation of an MUC1 mutation causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 9 (3): 527–35. doi:10.2215/CJN.06380613. PMC 3944763. PMID 24509297.
  10. Faguer S, Decramer S, Chassaing N, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Calvas P, Beaufils S, Bessenay L, Lengelé JP, Dahan K, Ronco P, Devuyst O, Chauveau D (October 2011). “Diagnosis, management, and prognosis of HNF1B nephropathy in adulthood”. Kidney Int. 80 (7): 768–76. doi:10.1038/ki.2011.225. PMID 21775974.
  11. Heidet L, Decramer S, Pawtowski A, Morinière V, Bandin F, Knebelmann B, Lebre AS, Faguer S, Guigonis V, Antignac C, Salomon R (June 2010). “Spectrum of HNF1B mutations in a large cohort of patients who harbor renal diseases”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 5 (6): 1079–90. doi:10.2215/CJN.06810909. PMC 2879303. PMID 20378641.
  12. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  13. Whalen RK, Althausen AF, Daniels GH (1992). “Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma”. J Urol. 147 (1): 1–10. PMID 1729490.
  14. Baid SK, Lai EW, Wesley RA, Ling A, Timmers HJ, Adams KT; et al. (2009). “Brief communication: radiographic contrast infusion and catecholamine release in patients with pheochromocytoma”. Ann Intern Med. 150 (1): 27–32. PMC 3490128. PMID 19124817.
  15. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  16. Burkitt lymphoma. MedlinePlus. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001308.htm Accessed on September 30, 2015
  17. Bellan C, Lazzi S, De Falco G, Nyongo A, Giordano A, Leoncini L (2003). “Burkitt’s lymphoma: new insights into molecular pathogenesis”. J. Clin. Pathol. 56 (3): 188–92. PMC 1769902. PMID 12610094. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  18. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J, Rohrschneider WK (2007). “Current radiological management of intussusception in children”. Eur Radiol. 17 (9): 2411–21. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0589-y. PMID 17308922.
  19. Boyle MJ, Arkell LJ, Williams JT (1993). “Ultrasonic diagnosis of adult intussusception”. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 88 (4): 617–8. PMID 8470658.
  20. Neuroblastoma. Radiopaedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 8 2015
  21. Colon NC, Chung DH (2011). “Neuroblastoma”. Adv Pediatr. 58 (1): 297–311. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2011.03.011. PMC 3668791. PMID 21736987.
  22. Neuroblastoma. Radiopaedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 8 2015
  23. Neuroblastoma. Libre Pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Adrenal_gland#Neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 5 2015
  24. Mesoblastic nephroma.Dr Ayush Goel and Dr Yuranga Weerakkody et al. Radiopaedia.org 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mesoblastic-nephroma
  25. Delli K, Spijkervet FK, Vissink A (2014). “Salivary gland diseases: infections, sialolithiasis and mucoceles”. Monogr Oral Sci. 24: 135–48. doi:10.1159/000358794. PMID 24862601.
  26. Delli K, Spijkervet FK, Vissink A (2014). “Salivary gland diseases: infections, sialolithiasis and mucoceles”. Monogr Oral Sci. 24: 135–48. doi:10.1159/000358794. PMID 24862601.
  27. Capaccio P, Torretta S, Pignataro L, Koch M (2017). “Salivary lithotripsy in the era of sialendoscopy”. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 37 (2): 113–121. doi:10.14639/0392-100X-1600. PMC 5463518. PMID 28516973.
  28. Wallace E, Tauzin M, Hagan J, Schaitkin B, Walvekar RR (2010). “Management of giant sialoliths: review of the literature and preliminary experience with interventional sialendoscopy”. Laryngoscope. 120 (10): 1974–8. doi:10.1002/lary.21082. PMID 20824782.
  29. Wallace E, Tauzin M, Hagan J, Schaitkin B, Walvekar RR (2010). “Management of giant sialoliths: review of the literature and preliminary experience with interventional sialendoscopy”. Laryngoscope. 120 (10): 1974–8. doi:10.1002/lary.21082. PMID 20824782.
  30. Loury, MC (2006). “Salivary gland disorder”. Advanced Otolaryngology.
  31. Raad II, Sabbagh MF, Caranasos GJ (1990). “Acute bacterial sialadenitis: a study of 29 cases and review”. Rev. Infect. Dis. 12 (4): 591–601. PMID 2385766.
  32. Silvers AR, Som PM (1998). “Salivary glands”. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 36 (5): 941–66, vi. PMID 9747195.
  33. Hoffbrand V, Moss P. Essential Haematology. John Wiley & Sons; 2011


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[3]

Overview

Burkitt’s lymphoma is a common disease that tends to affect children or young adults. Males are more commonly affected with Burkitt’s lymphoma compared to females. Burkitt’s lymphoma usually affects individuals of the African race.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence of is approximately 3 to 6 cases per 100,000 children per year for endemic and 0.02 cases per 100,000 people for sporadic burkitt’s lymphoma[1][2]

Age

  • Burkitt’s lymphoma is a common disease that tends to affect children or young adults. The median age at diagnosis is 8 years[3]

Gender

  • Males are more commonly affected with Burkitt’s lymphoma than females. The Male to Female ratio is approximately 4 to 1[4]

Race

  • Burkitt’s lymphoma usually affects individuals of the African race[4]

Region

  • The majority of Burkitt’s lymphoma cases are reported in equitorial Africa[5]

References

  1. Magrath, Ian (2012). “Epidemiology: clues to the pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma”. British Journal of Haematology. 156 (6): 744–756. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.09013.x. ISSN 0007-1048.
  2. Sant, M.; Allemani, C.; Tereanu, C.; De Angelis, R.; Capocaccia, R.; Visser, O.; Marcos-Gragera, R.; Maynadie, M.; Simonetti, A.; Lutz, J.-M.; Berrino, F. (2010). “Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project”. Blood. 116 (19): 3724–3734. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-282632. ISSN 0006-4971.
  3. Dozzo M, Carobolante F, Donisi PM, Scattolin A, Maino E, Sancetta R; et al. (2017). “Burkitt lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: management challenges”. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 8: 11–29. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S94170. PMC 5207020. PMID 28096698.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Boerma EG, van Imhoff GW, Appel IM, Veeger NJ, Kluin PM, Kluin-Nelemans JC (2004). “Gender and age-related differences in Burkitt lymphoma–epidemiological and clinical data from The Netherlands”. Eur J Cancer. 40 (18): 2781–7. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.09.004. PMID 15571961.
  5. Orem J, Mbidde EK, Lambert B, de Sanjose S, Weiderpass E (2007). “Burkitt’s lymphoma in Africa, a review of the epidemiology and etiology”. Afr Health Sci. 7 (3): 166–75. doi:10.5555/afhs.2007.7.3.166. PMC 2269718. PMID 18052871.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[3]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of Burkitt’s lymphoma are HIV/AIDS and post-transplant immunosuppression. There are no established risk factors for childhood Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of Burkitt’s lymphoma may include:[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Karimi P, Birmann BM, Anderson LA, McShane CM, Gadalla SM, Sampson JN; et al. (2018). “Risk factors for Burkitt lymphoma: a nested case-control study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink”. Br J Haematol. 181 (4): 505–514. doi:10.1111/bjh.15229. PMC 5980720. PMID 29676453.
  2. Meister A, Hentrich M, Wyen C, Hübel K (2018). “Malignant lymphoma in the HIV-positive patient”. Eur J Haematol. 101 (1): 119–126. doi:10.1111/ejh.13082. PMID 29663523.
  3. Naik S, Tayapongsak K, Robbins K, Manavi CK, Pettenati MJ, Grier DD (2013). “Burkitt’s Lymphoma Presenting as Late-Onset Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder following Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation: Case Report and Review of the Literature”. Case Rep Oncol. 6 (1): 6–14. doi:10.1159/000346346. PMC 3573821. PMID 23466659.
  4. Mbulaiteye SM, Clarke CA, Morton LM, Gibson TM, Pawlish K, Weisenburger DD; et al. (2013). “Burkitt lymphoma risk in U.S. solid organ transplant recipients”. Am J Hematol. 88 (4): 245–50. doi:10.1002/ajh.23385. PMC 3608801. PMID 23386365.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2]

Overview

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Screening

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Burkitt’s lymphoma.[1]

References

  1. Recommendations. U.S Preventive Services Task Force. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=Burkitt+lymphoma Accessed on October 1, 2015


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sowminya Arikapudi, M.B,B.S. [2], Kamal Akbar, M.D.[3]

Overview

The prognosis varies with the age, children have the most favorable prognosis. Burkitt’s lymphoma in children is associated with a 5 year survival rate of 90%. The presence of metastasis in bone marrow or CNS is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma.

Complications

Common complications of Burkitt’s lymphoma include:

Prognosis

  • In children, prognosis is good with survival rates >90%[5]
  • In adults, prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 50% and is even worse with bone marrow or CNS involvement (>30% 5-year survival rate).

References

  1. Comfort AO (2004). “Burkitt’s lymphoma of the jaws: role of dental practitioner in management”. Pac Health Dialog. 11 (1): 89–93. PMID 18181448.
  2. Aslan G (2013). “Unusual presentation of sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma originating from the nasal septum: a case report”. J Med Case Rep. 7: 60. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-7-60. PMC 3599746. PMID 23497670.
  3. Madabhavi I, Patel A, Revannasiddaiah S, Choudhary M, Anand A, Das P; et al. (2014). “Primary esophageal Burkitt’s lymphoma: a rare case report and review of literature”. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 7 (4): 230–7. PMC 4185878. PMID 25289138.
  4. Wössmann W, Schrappe M, Meyer U, Zimmermann M, Reiter A (2003). “Incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in children with advanced stage Burkitt’s lymphoma/leukemia before and after introduction of prophylactic use of urate oxidase”. Ann Hematol. 82 (3): 160–5. doi:10.1007/s00277-003-0608-2. PMID 12634948.
  5. Jacobson C, LaCasce A (2014). “How I treat Burkitt lymphoma in adults”. Blood. 124 (19): 2913–20. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-06-538504. PMID 25258344.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray Findings | CT | MRI | Biopsy | Other Imaging Studies | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Cost Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:Chromosomal abnormalities

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH