Cryptococcosis
Template:DiseaseDisorder infobox
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D., Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Synonyms and keywords: Busse-Buschke Disease; Torulosis; European Blastomycosis; Cryptococcal Meningitis; Cryptococcal Pneumonia
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Cryptococcosis is an infection acquired by inhalation of soil contaminated with the encapsulated yeast (fungus) Cryptococcus neoformans. The immune response to cryptococcal infection is highly dependent on host T-cell function, interferon-γ and TNF-α signaling is impaired in immunocompromised patients, resulting in disease. The overall incidence of cryptococcosis is estimated to be 0.4 to 1.3 cases per 100,000 persons yearly in the United States. C. neoformans can cause no infection, latent infection, or symptomatic disease. C. neoformans enters the body through the respiratory route, and infection can present as pneumonia-like illness with symptoms such as cough, fever, chest pain, and weight loss. If left untreated, C. neoformans can disseminate to the central nervous system, causing meningoencephalitis. Prognosis is poor without treatment, with a mortality rate reaching 10 to 30% within 3 weeks of presentation. The standard regimen of treatment in non-AIDS patients is intravenous amphotericin B combined with oral flucytosine. AIDS patients often have a reduced response to amphotericin B and flucytosine, therefore, after initial treatment as above, oral fluconazole can be used.
Historical Perspective
Cryptococci, initially thought to be of the Saccharomyces genus, were first identified in 1894 by German pathologist Otto Busse in a patient with chronic periostitis of the tibia. In 1901, Jean Paul Vuillemin, a French mycologist, moved the yeast-like fungus to the genus Cryptococcus due to the absence of ascospores in its life cycle, a defining feature of Saccharomyces.
Classification
Cryptococcosis may be classified based on the site of infection. The clinical syndrome can be classified as pulmonary, CNS, or disseminated cryptococcosis. Another approach to the classification involves the species or variety of the Cryptococcus causative organism, including Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, and other, rare species.
Pathophysiology
Infective cryptococcal species are ubiquitous and natural exposure by inhalation is very common. Cryptococci are intracellular pathogens. Once they are phagocytosed, they germinate and multiply within the macrophages. The immune response to cryptococcal infection is highly dependent on host T-cell function, interferon-γ and TNF-α signaling. Microscopically, Cryptococci are characterized by a thick mucopolysaccharide capsule with a refractile center.
Causes
Cryptococcosis is an infection acquired by inhalation of soil contaminated with the encapsulated yeast (fungus) Cryptococcus neoformans.
Differentiating Cryptococcosis from other Diseases
Cryptococcosis is more common among immunocompromised patients who are at high risk for other fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. Cryptococcal meningitis can be indistinguishable from bacterial or viral meningitis. Cryptococcosis must be differentiated from diseases that cause symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (fever, dyspnea, cough) and meningitis (fever, headache, neck stiffness, focal neurological deficits) such as coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, tuberculosis, and community/hospital-acquired pneumonia. Cutaneous cryptococcosis in HIV/AIDS patients must be differentiated from molluscum contagiosum and Kaposi’s sarcoma.
Epidemiology and Demographics
The prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia among patients with HIV in the United States is approximately 2900 per 100,000 patients. The overall annual incidence is estimated to be 0.4 to 1.3 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Cryptococcosis has no age, gender, or racial predilection.
Risk Factors
Risk factors for the development of cryptococcal infection include being immunocompromised and inhalational exposure (most commonly from dry bird droppings).
Screening
Asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia is very common in areas with endemic HIV/AIDS, and is associated with increased mortality and incidence of cryptococcal meningitis. Screening is not recommended for HIV/AIDS patients in the United States or Europe. However, screening may be beneficial in countries with limited HAART availability, high levels of antiretroviral drug resistance, and a high burden of disease. In the absence of symptoms, positive cryptococcal antigenemia should be treated with oral fluconazole.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
C. neoformans can cause no infection, latent infection, or symptomatic disease. C. neoformans enters the body through the respiratory route. Infection can present as pneumonia-like illness with symptoms such as cough, fever, chest pain, and weight loss. If left untreated, C. neoformans can disseminate to the central nervous system and cause meningoencephalitis. Prognosis is poor without treatment, with a mortality rate reaching 10 to 30% within 3 weeks of presentation.
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
The symptoms of cryptococcosis depend on the site of infection/clinical syndrome, the virulence of the yeast strain, and the immune status of the host. Patients may be completely asymptomatic, have latent infection, or have symptomatic disease. Cryptococcus enters the body through the respiratory route. Infection can present as pneumonia-like illness with fever, cough, sputum production, and chest pain. Cryptococcus can also disseminate to the central nervous system and cause meningoencephalitis presenting with headache, nausea, vomiting, altered sensorium, and focal neurological deficits.
Physical Examination
Physical examination findings in patients with cryptococcal meningitis include fever, nystagmus, papilledema, and cranial nerve deficits. Cutaneous cryptococcal infection presents with erythematous papules, pustules, nodules, and ulcers. Rales can be heard on auscultation of the chest in pulmonary cryptococcus infection.
Laboratory Findings
Cryptococcal disease can be diagnosed through culture, CSF microscopy, or by cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) detection.
Chest X-Ray
Chest radiography in a patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis may demonstrate interstitial infiltrates, pleural effusion, or hilar lymphadenopathy.
CT
The most common CT findings in patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis are pulmonary nodules and pulmonary opacities that range from a perihilar interstitial pattern to an area of dense alveolar consolidation.
MRI
Common MRI findings in patients with cryptococcal meningitis include Virchow-Robin dilatation, hydrocephalus, intracerebral nodules, and pseudocysts.
Other Imaging Findings
There are no associated other imaging findings with cryptococcal infection.
Other Diagnostic studies
Other diagnostic studies helpful diagnosing cryptococcal infection include demonstration of the budding yeast on an India ink stain, staining the polysaccharide cell wall using mucicarmine stain, detection of cryptococcal antigen in CSF, and a positive culture for Cryptococcus neoformans.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
The standard regimen of treatment in non-AIDS patients is intravenous amphotericin B combined with oral flucytosine. AIDS patients often have a reduced response to amphotericin B and flucytosine, therefore, after initial treatment as above, oral fluconazole can be used.
Surgery
Surgical excision of cryptococcoma is recommended if the lesions are larger than 3 cm, accessible lesions have a mass effect or compress vital structures, or the size of the cryptococcoma fails to decrease after 4 weeks of medical therapy.
Prevention
Primary prevention
It is recommended that patients with CD4 counts ≤ 100 cells/μl should have routine cryptococcal antigen screening and patients with positive results should be offered preemptive anti-fungal therapy.
Secondary Prevention
Secondary preventive measures for cryptococcal infection are the same as primary prevention measures.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Cryptococci, initially thought to be of the Saccharomyces genus, were first identified in 1894 by German pathologist Otto Busse in a patient with chronic periostitis of the tibia. In 1901, Jean Paul Vuillemin, a French mycologist, moved the yeast-like fungus to the genus Cryptococcus due to the absence of ascospores in its life cycle, a defining feature of Saccharomyces.
Historical Perspective
- Cryptococci were first identified in 1894 by German pathologist Otto Busse in a patient with chronic periostitis of the tibia. He described the isolated organism as a “Saccharomyces-like” pathogen.[1]
- The infection was referred to as “Busse-Buschke” disease named after Busse and his colleague, dermatologist Abraham Buschke.[2]
- Busse later named the organism Saccharomyces hominis.
- During the same time period, Francesco Sanfelice reported isolating a similar organism from fermenting peach juice. Because of its unique colony form, he referred to the species as Saccharomyces neoformans.
- In 1901, Jean Paul Vuillemin, a French mycologist, transferred the yeast-like fungus to the genus Cryptococcus due to the absence of ascospores in its life cycle, a defining feature of Saccharomyces.[3]
- In the 1950s, four capsule serotypes (A through D) were identified using rabbit antisera. This classification was later improved by DNA sequencing, epidemiology, and pathobiology.[1][4]
- Until 1999, Cryptococcus gattii was known as Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii, until it was recognized as separate species with distinct epidemiological patterns and clinical manifestations.[5]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Srikanta D, Santiago-Tirado FH, Doering TL (2014). “Cryptococcus neoformans: historical curiosity to modern pathogen”. Yeast. 31 (2): 47–60. doi:10.1002/yea.2997. PMID 24375706.
- ↑ Knoke M, Schwesinger G (1994). “One hundred years ago: the history of cryptococcosis in Greifswald. Medical mycology in the nineteenth century”. Mycoses. 37 (7–8): 229–33. PMID 7739651.
- ↑ Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study. 2011
- ↑ EVANS EE (1950). “The antigenic composition of Cryptococcus neoformans. I. A serologic classification by means of the capsular and agglutination reactions”. J Immunol. 64 (5): 423–30. PMID 15415610.
- ↑ Rolston KV (2013). “Cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus gattii”. Clin Infect Dis. 57 (4): 552–4. doi:10.1093/cid/cit342. PMID 23697746.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Cryptococcosis may be classified based on the site of infection. The clinical syndrome can be classified as pulmonary, CNS, or disseminated cryptococcosis. Another approach to the classification is based upon the variety of species of the Cryptococcus causative organism, including Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, and other, rarer species.
Classification
Cryptococcosis may be classified based on the site of infection (the clinical syndrome), or the species of the Cryptococcus causative organism.
Site of Infection
- Pulmonary Cryptococcosis
- The most common clinical syndrome associated with Cryptococcus, but may be asymptomatic.[1]
- Related to the mode of transmission via aerosolized basidiospores.[2]
- Extra-pulmonary infections are thought to be secondary to a primary pulmonary infection, even in cases where the latter is not evident.
- Central Nervous System (CNS) Cryptococcosis
- Classically seen in patients with AIDS and low CD4 counts (below 100).[3]
- Secondary to dissemination of inhaled spores in patients who are severely immunocompromised.
- Cryptococcosis is one of the leading causes of meningitis in adults worldwide.[4]
- Disseminated Cryptococcosis
- Most often involves the skin, soft tissue, and the medulla of the bone in addition to the lungs and CNS.[5]
- Also associated with a severely immunocompromised status.
Causative Species
(a) Cryptococcus neoformans
- The most common cryptococcal species associated with human disease.
- Variety includes:
- Cryptococcus neoformans v. neoformans (serotype D)
- The major causative agent of cryptococcosis in Europe.[7]
- Cryptococcus neoformans v. grubii (serotype A)
- The major causative agent of cryptococcosis in Asia and the U.S.[8]
- Previously a variant of C. neoformans, currently classified as a separate species.
- Emerging as a common fungal pathogen in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.[9]
(c) Cryptococcus uniguttulatus
- Very rare
- Associated with ventriculitis[10]
- First isolated from a human nail
(d) Cryptococcus laurentii
- Rare
- Associated with fungemia, lung abscesses, and meningitis.[11]
(e) Cryptococcus albidus
- Very rare
- Associated with ocular infections and meningitis.[12]
- Although other species of Cryptococci exist, they are not known to be infectious to humans.
References
- ↑ Núñez M, Peacock JE, Chin R (2000). “Pulmonary cryptococcosis in the immunocompetent host. Therapy with oral fluconazole: a report of four cases and a review of the literature”. Chest. 118 (2): 527–34. PMID 10936151.
- ↑ Velagapudi R, Hsueh YP, Geunes-Boyer S, Wright JR, Heitman J (2009). “Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans”. Infect Immun. 77 (10): 4345–55. doi:10.1128/IAI.00542-09. PMC 2747963. PMID 19620339.
- ↑ Chuck SL, Sande MA (1989). “Infections with Cryptococcus neoformans in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome”. N Engl J Med. 321 (12): 794–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM198909213211205. PMID 2671735.
- ↑ C. neoformans Infection Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). http://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/cryptococcosis-neoformans/statistics.html. Accessed on December 31, 2015
- ↑ Chuang YM, Ho YC, Chang HT, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Hsueh PR (2008). “Disseminated cryptococcosis in HIV-uninfected patients”. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27 (4): 307–10. doi:10.1007/s10096-007-0430-1. PMID 18157678.
- ↑ Naka W, Masuda M, Konohana A, Shinoda T, Nishikawa T (1995). “Primary cutaneous cryptococcosis and Cryptococcus neoformans serotype D.” Clin Exp Dermatol. 20 (3): 221–5. PMID 7671417.
- ↑ Cogliati M (2013). “Global Molecular Epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii: An Atlas of the Molecular Types”. Scientifica (Cairo). 2013: 675213. doi:10.1155/2013/675213. PMC 3820360. PMID 24278784.
- ↑ Khayhan K, Hagen F, Pan W, Simwami S, Fisher MC, Wahyuningsih R, Chakrabarti A, Chowdhary A, Ikeda R, Taj-Aldeen SJ, Khan Z, Ip M, Imran D, Sjam R, Sriburee P, Liao W, Chaicumpar K, Vuddhakul V, Meyer W, Trilles L, van Iersel LJ, Meis JF, Klaassen CH, Boekhout T (2013). “Geographically structured populations of Cryptococcus neoformans Variety grubii in Asia correlate with HIV status and show a clonal population structure”. PLoS ONE. 8 (9): e72222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072222. PMC 3760895. PMID 24019866.
- ↑ Datta K, Bartlett KH, Baer R, Byrnes E, Galanis E, Heitman J; et al. (2009). “Spread of Cryptococcus gattii into Pacific Northwest region of the United States”. Emerg Infect Dis. 15 (8): 1185–91. doi:10.3201/eid1508.081384. PMC 2815957. PMID 19757550.
- ↑ McCurdy LH, Morrow JD (2001). “Ventriculitis due to Cryptococcus uniguttulatus”. South Med J. 94 (1): 65–6. PMID 11213945.
- ↑ Shankar EM, Kumarasamy N, Bella D, Renuka S, Kownhar H, Suniti S, Rajan R, Rao UA (2006). “Pneumonia and pleural effusion due to Cryptococcus laurentii in a clinically proven case of AIDS”. Can. Respir. J. 13 (5): 275–8. PMC 2683308. PMID 16896431.
- ↑ Johnson LB, Bradley SF, Kauffman CA (1998). “Fungaemia due to Cryptococcus laurentii and a review of non-neoformans cryptococcaemia”. Mycoses. 41 (7–8): 277–80. PMID 9861831.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Infective cryptococcal species are ubiquitous and natural exposure by inhalation is very common. Cryptococci are intracellular pathogens. Once they are phagocytosed, they germinate and multiply within the macrophages. The immune response to cryptococcal infection is highly dependent on host T-cell function, interferon-γ and TNF-α signaling. Microscopically, Cryptococci are characterized by a thick mucopolysaccharide capsule with a refractile center.
Pathophysiology
Transmission
- Infective cryptococcal species are ubiquitous and natural exposure is very common.[1]
- Infection occurs by inhalation of aerosolized, dessicated basidiospores.[2]
Virulence factors
- Cryptococcus polysaccharide capsule, phospholipase activity and extracellular vesicles play key roles in the survival of the organism within the host.[3]
Pathogenesis
- Once these spores reach the alveoli, they are phagocytosed by the alveolar macrophages without prior opsonization (usually required for yeast forms).
- Cryptococci are intracellular pathogens. Once they are phagocytosed, they germinate and multiply within the macrophages.[4]
- Activated macrophages are capable of destroying the yeast forms that develop; however, non-activated macrophages act as germination centers for cryptococci.[5]
- Cryptococci have the ability to form giant cells that resist phagocytosis and have been hypothesized to play a role in latent infections, and reactivation.[5]
- Cryptococci also have the ability to change the number of sets of chromosomes they have during infection; this has been associated with heteroresistance to certain antifungal agents.[6]
Host response
- After exposure to desiccated yeast cells or spores, patients may clear the infection, contain it within granulomata as a latent infection, or the infection may disseminate. This depends on the host’s immune status or other, less well-understood mechanisms.
Dissemination
- Disseminated disease occurs among patients with compromised cell-mediated immunity.
- The immune response to cryptococcal infection is highly dependent on host T-cell function, interferon-γ and TNF-α signaling.
- Granuloma formation can be seen and may also be responsible for reactivation in patients presenting with immunocompromised states.[7][8]
Microscopic Pathology


- Cryptococcus exists in yeast form.
- It is round/ovoid and approximately 5-15 μm (resembles Histoplasma or Candida, but often larger).
- It is characterized by a thick mucopolysaccharide capsule with a refractile center.
- India ink staining is used for easy visualization of the capsule in cerebrospinal fluid.[9]
- It has a tear drop-shaped budding pattern which is useful for differentiating Cryptococcus from Blastomyces and Histoplasma.
- Cryptococcal infections are usually accompanied by very little inflammation.
- Cryptococcus stain positive with methenamine silver, Alcian blue, and PAS (may be confused with corpora amylacea in the CNS).[10]
Cryptococcosis (PAS stain)
{{#ev:youtube|ZG0AcmtBLe4}}
References
- ↑ Wang CY, Wu HD, Hsueh PR (2005). “Nosocomial transmission of cryptococcosis”. N. Engl. J. Med. 352 (12): 1271–2. doi:10.1056/NEJM200503243521225. PMID 15788512.
- ↑ Jarvis JN, Harrison TS (2008). “Pulmonary cryptococcosis”. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 29 (2): 141–50. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1063853. PMID 18365996.
- ↑ Alspaugh JA (2015). “Virulence mechanisms and Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis”. Fungal Genet. Biol. 78: 55–8. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2014.09.004. PMC 4370805. PMID 25256589.
- ↑ Goldman D, Lee SC, Casadevall A (1994). “Pathogenesis of pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection in the rat”. Infect. Immun. 62 (11): 4755–61. PMC 303183. PMID 7927751.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Mansour MK, Reedy JL, Tam JM, Vyas JM (2014). “Macrophage Cryptococcus interactions: an update”. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 8 (1): 109–115. doi:10.1007/s12281-013-0165-7. PMC 3958962. PMID 24660045.
- ↑ Sionov E, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ (2013). “Azole heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans: emergence of resistant clones with chromosomal disomy in the mouse brain during fluconazole treatment”. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57 (10): 5127–30. doi:10.1128/AAC.00694-13. PMC 3811407. PMID 23836187.
- ↑ Brizendine KD, Baddley JW, Pappas PG (2011). “Pulmonary cryptococcosis”. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 32 (6): 727–34. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1295720. PMID 22167400.
- ↑ May RC, Stone NR, Wiesner DL, Bicanic T, Nielsen K (2015). “Cryptococcus: from environmental saprophyte to global pathogen”. Nat Rev Microbiol. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2015.6. PMID 26685750.
- ↑ Zerpa R, Huicho L, Guillén A (1996). “Modified India ink preparation for Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid specimens”. J Clin Microbiol. 34 (9): 2290–1. PMC 229234. PMID 8862601.
- ↑ Fungi. Libre Pathology (2015). http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Fungi#Cryptococcosis. Accessed on December 31, 2015.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]
Overview
Cryptococcus neoformans is an encapsulated yeast and an obligate aerobe that can live in both plants and animals.[1] [2]It is often found in bird excrement. It is the causative agent of cryptococcosis (cryptococcal pneumonia and meningitis).
Classification
Cryptococcus neoformans is composed of two varieties (v.): C. neoformans v. neoformans and C. n. v. grubii. A third variety, C. n. v. gattii, is now considered a distinct species, Cryptococcus gattii. C. n. v. grubii and C. n. v. neoformans have a worldwide distribution and are often found in soil contaminated by bird excrement. The genome sequence of C. neoformans v. neoformans was published in 2005.[3] Recent studies suggest colonies of C. neoformans and related fungi growing on the ruins of the melted down reactor of the chernobyl nuclear power plant may be able to use the energy of radiation (primary beta radiation) for “radiotrophic” growth.[4]
Characteristics

C. neoformans grows as a yeast (unicellular) and replicates by budding. It makes hyphae during mating, and eventually creates basidiospores at the end of the hyphae before producing spores. Under host-relevant conditions, including low glucose, serum, 5% carbon dioxide, and low iron, among others, the cells produce a characteristic polysaccharide capsule.[5] The recognition of C. neoformans in Gram-stained smears of purulent exudates may be hampered by the presence of the large gelatinous capsule which apparently prevents definitive staining of the yeast-like cells. In such stained preparations, it may appear either as round cells with Gram-positive granular inclusions impressed upon a pale lavender cytoplasmic background or as Gram-negative lipoid bodies.[6] When grown as a yeast, C. neoformans has a prominent capsule composed mostly of polysaccharides. Under the microscope, the India ink stain is used for easy visualization of the capsule in cerebrospinal fluid.[7] The particles of ink pigment do not enter the capsule that surrounds the spherical yeast cell, resulting in a zone of clearance or “halo” around the cells. This allows for quick and easy identification of C. neoformans. Unusual morphological forms are rarely seen.[8] For identification in tissue, mucicarmine stain provides specific staining of polysaccharide cell wall in C. neoformans. Cryptococcal antigen from cerebrospinal fluid is thought to be the best test for diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis in terms of sensitivity, though it might be unreliable in HIV-positive patients.[9]
Pathology

Infection with C. neoformans is termed cryptococcosis. Most infections with C. neoformans occur in the lungs.[10] However, fungal meningitis and encephalitis, especially as a secondary infection for AIDS patients, are often caused by C. neoformans, making it a particularly dangerous fungus. Infections with this fungus are rare in those with fully functioning immune systems.[11] So, C. neoformans is sometimes referred to as an opportunistic fungus.[11] It is a facultative intracellular pathogen.[12] Cryptococcus neoformans was the first intracellular pathogen for which the non-lytic escape process termed vomocytosis was observed.[13][14]
In human infection, C. neoformans is spread by inhalation of aerosolized basidiospores, and can disseminate to the central nervous system, where it can cause meningoencephalitis.[15] In the lungs, C. neoformans cells are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages.[16] Macrophages produce oxidative and nitrosative agents, creating a hostile environment, to kill invading pathogens.[17] However, some C. neoformans cells can survive intracellularly in macrophages.[16] Intracellular survival appears to be the basis for latency, disseminated disease, and resistance to eradication by antifungal agents. One mechanism by which C. neoformans survives the hostile intracellular environment of the macrophage involves upregulation of expression of genes involved in responses to oxidative stress.[16]
Traversal of the blood–brain barrier by C. neoformans plays a key role in meningitis pathogenesis.[18] However, precise mechanisms by which it passes the blood-brain barrier are still unknown; one recent study in rats suggested an important role of secreted serine proteases.[19] The metalloprotease Mpr1 has been demonstrated to be critical in blood-brain barrier penetration.[20]
The vast majority of environmental and clinical isolates of C. neoformans are mating type a. Filaments of mating type a have haploid nuclei ordinarily, but these can undergo a process of diploidization (perhaps by endoduplication or stimulated nuclear fusion) to form diploid cells termed blastospores. The diploid nuclei of blastospores are able to undergo meiosis, including recombination, to form haploid basidiospores that can then be dispersed.[21] This process is referred to as monokaryotic fruiting. Required for this process is a gene designated dmc1, a conserved homologue of genes recA in bacteria, and rad51 in eukaryotes (see articles recA and rad51). Dmc1 mediates homologous chromosome pairing during meiosis and repair of double-strand breaks in DNA.[22] One benefit of meiosis in C. neoformans could be to promote DNA repair in the DNA-damaging environment caused by the oxidative and nitrosative agents produced in macrophages.[21] Thus, C. neoformans can undergo a meiotic process, monokaryotic fruiting, that may promote recombinational repair in the oxidative, DNA-damaging environment of the host macrophage, and this may contribute to its virulence.
References
- ↑ “What Makes Cryptococcus neoformans a Pathogen? – Volume 4, Number 1—March 1998 – Emerging Infectious Disease journal – CDC”. wwwnc.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2015-11-18.
- ↑ Ingavale, Susham S.; Chang, Yun C.; Lee, Hyeseung; McClelland, Carol M.; Leong, Madeline L.; Kwon-Chung, Kyung J. (2008-09-01). “Importance of Mitochondria in Survival of Cryptococcus neoformans Under Low Oxygen Conditions and Tolerance to Cobalt Chloride”. PLoS Pathogens. 4 (9): e1000155. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000155. ISSN 1553-7366. PMC 2528940. PMID 18802457.
- ↑ Loftus BJ; et al. (2005). “The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans”. Science. 307 (5713): 1321&ndash, 24. doi:10.1126/science.1103773. PMC 3520129. PMID 15653466.
- ↑ Dadachova E; et al. (2007). Rutherford, Julian, ed. “Ionizing Radiation Changes the Electronic Properties of Melanin and Enhances the Growth of Melanized Fungi”. PLoS ONE. 2 (5): e457. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000457. PMC 1866175. PMID 17520016.
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ Bottone, E J. “Cryptococcus neoformans: pitfalls in diagnosis through evaluation of gram-stained smears of purulent exudates”. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Retrieved 2014-11-19.
- ↑ Zerpa, R; Huicho, L; Guillén, A (September 1996). “Modified India ink preparation for Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid specimens” (PDF). Journal of clinical microbiology. 34 (9): 2290–1. PMID 8862601.
- ↑ Shashikala; Kanungo, R; Srinivasan, S; Mathew, R; Kannan, M (Jul–Sep 2004). “Unusual morphological forms of Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid”. Indian journal of medical microbiology. 22 (3): 188–90. PMID 17642731.
- ↑ Antinori, Spinello; Radice, Anna; Galimberti, Laura; Magni, Carlo; Fasan, Marco; Parravicini, Carlo (November 2005). “The role of cryptococcal antigen assay in diagnosis and monitoring of cryptococcal meningitis”. Journal of clinical microbiology. 43 (11): 5828–9. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5828-5829.2005. PMC 1287839. PMID 16272534.
- ↑ Tripathi K, Mor V, Bairwa NK, Del Poeta M, Mohanty BK. (2012).“Hydroxyurea treatment inhibits proliferation of Cryptococcus neoformans in mice.”
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 What Makes Cryptococcus neoformans a Pathogen?, Kent L. Buchanan and Juneann W. Murphy University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- ↑ Template:Cite doi
- ↑ Alvarez, M; Casadevall, A (7 November 2006). “Phagosome extrusion and host-cell survival after Cryptococcus neoformans phagocytosis by macrophages”. Current biology : CB. 16 (21): 2161–5. PMID 17084702.
- ↑ Ma, H; Croudace, JE; Lammas, DA; May, RC (7 November 2006). “Expulsion of live pathogenic yeast by macrophages”. Current biology : CB. 16 (21): 2156–60. PMID 17084701.
- ↑ Velagapudi R, Hsueh YP, Geunes-Boyer S, Wright JR, Heitman J (2009). Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans” Infect Immun 77(10) 4345-55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00542-09. PMID 19620339
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Fan W, Kraus PR, Boily MJ, Heitman J (2005). Cryptococcus neoformans gene expression during murine macrophage infection. Eukaryot Cell 4(8) 1420-1433. PMID 16087747
- ↑ Alspaugh JA, Granger DL (1991). Inhibition of Cryptococcus neoformans replication by nitrogen oxides supports the role of these molecules as effectors of macrophage-mediated cytostasis” Infect Immun 59(7) 2291-2296. PMID 2050398
- ↑ Liu TB (2012). “Molecular mechanisms of cryptococcal meningitis”. Virulence. 3 (2): 173–81. doi:10.4161/viru.18685. PMC 3396696. PMID 22460646.
- ↑ Xu CY (Feb 2014). “permeability of blood-brain barrier is mediated by serine protease during Cryptococcus meningitis”. J Int Med Res. 42 (1): 85–92. doi:10.1177/0300060513504365. PMID 24398759.
- ↑ http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-06-fungal-protein-blood-brain-barrier.html
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Lin X, Hull CM, Heitman J (2005). Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans” Nature 434(7036) 1017-1021. PMID 15846346
- ↑ Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens” Infect Genet Evol 8(3) 267-285. Review. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002 PMID 18295550 http://www.hummingbirds.arizona.edu/Faculty/Michod/Downloads/IGE%20review%20sex.pdf
Differentiating Cryptococcosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Cryptococcosis is more common among immunocompromised patients who are at high risk for other fungal, bacterial and viral infections. Cryptococcal meningitis can be indistinguishable from bacterial or viral meningitis. Cryptococcosis must be differentiated from diseases that cause symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (fever, dyspnea, cough) and meningitis (fever, headache, neck stiffness, focal neurological deficits) such as coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, tuberculosis, and community/hospital-acquired pneumonia. Cutaneous cryptococcosis in HIV/AIDS patients must be differentiated from molluscum contagiosum and Kaposi’s sarcoma.
Differentiating Cryptococcosis from other Diseases
Cryptococcosis is more common among immunocompromised patients who are at high risk for other fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. It should be differentiated from the following diseases which all may cause neurological dysfuntion in an immunocompromised patient:
| Disease | Differentiating signs and symptoms | Differentiating tests |
|---|---|---|
| CNS lymphoma[1] |
|
|
| Disseminated tuberculosis[2] |
|
|
| Aspergillosis[3] |
|
|
| Cryptococcosis |
|
|
| Chagas disease[4] |
|
|
| CMV infection[5] |
|
|
| HSV infection[6] |
|
|
| Varicella Zoster infection[7] |
|
|
| Brain abscess[8][9] |
|
|
| Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy[10] |
|
Cutaneous Cryptococcosis must be differentiated from the following diseases:
- Molluscum contagiosum[11]
- Is very similar in appearance to disseminated cryptococcosis manifesting on the skin (umbilicated lesions).
- Patients are usually less sick, as molluscum is restricted to the skin.
- Kaposi’s Sarcoma[12][13]
- Cutaneous cryptococcosis may also present with violaceous papules.
- It can only be differentiated by biopsy.
- Blastomycosis[14]
- CNS involvement is much less common with blastomyces.
- Cutaneous manifestations may resemble cutaneous cryptococcosis.
- Not ubiquitous, more common in endemic areas in North America.
Differentiating cryptococcal meningitis from other causes of meningitis
Cryptococcal meningitis may be differentiated from other causes of meningitis by cerebrospinal fluid examination as shown below:[15][16][17][18][19]
| Cerebrospinal fluid level | Normal level | Bacterial meningitis[18] | Viral meningitis[18] | Cryptococcal meningitis | Tuberculous meningitis[20] | Malignant meningitis[15] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cells/ul | < 5 | >300 | 10-1000 | 10-500 | 50-500 | >4 |
| Cells | Lymphocyte:Monocyte 7:3 | Granulocyte > Lymphocyte | Lymphocyte > Granulocyte | Lympho.>Granulocyte | Lymphocytes | Lymphocytes |
| Total protein (mg/dl) | 45-60 | Typically 100-500 | Normal or slightly high | High | Typically 100-200 | >50 |
| Glucose ratio (CSF/plasma)[16] | > 0.5 | < 0.3 | > 0.6 | <0.3 | < 0.5 | <0.5 |
| Lactate (mmols/l)[17] | < 2.1 | > 2.1 | < 2.1 | >3.2 | > 2.1 | >2.1 |
| Others | ICP:6-12 (cm H2O) | CSF gram stain, CSF culture, CSF bacterial antigen | PCR of HSV-DNA, VZV | CSF gram stain, CSF india ink | PCR of TBC-DNA | CSF tumor markers such as alpha fetoproteins, CEA |
References
- ↑ Gerstner ER, Batchelor TT (2010). “Primary central nervous system lymphoma”. Arch. Neurol. 67 (3): 291–7. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.3. PMID 20212226.
- ↑ von Reyn CF, Kimambo S, Mtei L, Arbeit RD, Maro I, Bakari M, Matee M, Lahey T, Adams LV, Black W, Mackenzie T, Lyimo J, Tvaroha S, Waddell R, Kreiswirth B, Horsburgh CR, Pallangyo K (2011). “Disseminated tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus infection: ineffective immunity, polyclonal disease and high mortality”. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 15 (8): 1087–92. doi:10.5588/ijtld.10.0517. PMID 21740673.
- ↑ Latgé JP (1999). “Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis”. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12 (2): 310–50. PMC 88920. PMID 10194462.
- ↑ Rassi A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA (2010). “Chagas disease”. Lancet. 375 (9723): 1388–402. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60061-X. PMID 20399979.
- ↑ Emery VC (2001). “Investigation of CMV disease in immunocompromised patients”. J. Clin. Pathol. 54 (2): 84–8. PMC 1731357. PMID 11215290.
- ↑ Bustamante CI, Wade JC (1991). “Herpes simplex virus infection in the immunocompromised cancer patient”. J. Clin. Oncol. 9 (10): 1903–15. doi:10.1200/JCO.1991.9.10.1903. PMID 1919640.
- ↑ Hambleton S (2005). “Chickenpox”. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 18 (3): 235–40. PMID 15864101.
- ↑ Alvis Miranda H, Castellar-Leones SM, Elzain MA, Moscote-Salazar LR (2013). “Brain abscess: Current management”. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 4 (Suppl 1): S67–81. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116472. PMC 3808066. PMID 24174804.
- ↑ Patel K, Clifford DB (2014). “Bacterial brain abscess”. Neurohospitalist. 4 (4): 196–204. doi:10.1177/1941874414540684. PMC 4212419. PMID 25360205.
- ↑ Tan CS, Koralnik IJ (2010). “Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and other disorders caused by JC virus: clinical features and pathogenesis”. Lancet Neurol. 9 (4): 425–37. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70040-5. PMC 2880524. PMID 20298966.
- ↑ Penneys NS, Hicks B (1985). “Unusual cutaneous lesions associated with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 13 (5 Pt 1): 845–52. PMID 3001157.
- ↑ Jones C, Orengo I, Rosen T, Ellner K (1990). “Cutaneous cryptococcosis simulating Kaposi’s sarcoma in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome”. Cutis. 45 (3): 163–7. PMID 2311432.
- ↑ Blauvelt A, Kerdel FA (1992). “Cutaneous cryptococcosis mimicking Kaposi’s sarcoma as the initial manifestation of disseminated disease”. Int J Dermatol. 31 (4): 279–80. PMID 1634295.
- ↑ Boyars MC, Zwischenberger JB, Cox Jr CS. Clinical manifestations of pulmonary fungal infections. Journal of thoracic imaging. 1992 Sep 1;7(4):12-22.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC (2013). “Carcinomatous meningitis: Leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors”. Surg Neurol Int. 4 (Suppl 4): S265–88. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.111304. PMC 3656567. PMID 23717798.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Chow E, Troy SB (2014). “The differential diagnosis of hypoglycorrhachia in adult patients”. Am J Med Sci. 348 (3): 186–90. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000217. PMC 4065645. PMID 24326618.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Leen WG, Willemsen MA, Wevers RA, Verbeek MM (2012). “Cerebrospinal fluid glucose and lactate: age-specific reference values and implications for clinical practice”. PLoS One. 7 (8): e42745. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042745. PMC 3412827. PMID 22880096.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 Negrini B, Kelleher KJ, Wald ER (2000). “Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aseptic versus bacterial meningitis”. Pediatrics. 105 (2): 316–9. PMID 10654948.
- ↑ Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D (2010). “Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis”. Clin Microbiol Rev. 23 (3): 467–92. doi:10.1128/CMR.00070-09. PMC 2901656. PMID 20610819.
- ↑ Caudie C, Tholance Y, Quadrio I, Peysson S (2010). “[Contribution of CSF analysis to diagnosis and follow-up of tuberculous meningitis]”. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 68 (1): 107–11. doi:10.1684/abc.2010.0407. PMID 20146981.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D., Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
The prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia among patients with HIV in the United States is approximately 2900 per 100,000 patients. The overall incidence is estimated to be 0.4 to 1.3 cases per 100,000 persons yearly in the United States. Cryptococcosis has no age, gender, or racial predilections.[1]
Epidemiology and Demographics
Prevalence
- The prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia in the general population is unknown. Given the low incidence in the general population, it is thought to be very low.
- Among HIV patients in the United States, the prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia is approximately 2900 per 100,000 patients with HIV, indicating that the prevalence of cryptococcal infection may be high enough to consider targeted screening for HIV patients.[1]
Incidence
- Worldwide, the annual incidence of cryptococcosis in HIV/AIDS patients has been estimated to be 220,000 cases.[2]
- Nationally, representative estimates for the incidence of cryptococcosis are difficult to establish because cryptococcosis is only reportable in a few states.
- Results from active, population-based surveillance in two U.S. locations in the year 2000 indicated that the annual incidence of cryptococcosis among persons with AIDS ranged from a low of 200 cases per 100,000 patients to a high of 700 cases per 100,000 patients.
- The overall annual incidence in the U.S. ranges from a low of 0.4 per 100,000 individuals to a high of 1.3 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States.[3]
- C. neoformans is a major cause of meningitis in people living with HIV/AIDS, with an estimated 1 million cases of cryptococcal meningitis occurring worldwide each year.[1][4]
Age, Gender, and Race
Cryptococcosis has no age, gender, or racial predilection.[1]
Developed vs. developing countries
The geographical distribution of endemic fungi causing meningitis are shown below:[5]
| Fungus | Geographic distribution |
|---|---|
| Blastomyces dermatiditis | Midwest and Southeast of USA, lower Mississippi valley up to the North Central states, and into the Mid-Atlantic states. |
| Coccidiodes immitis | Mostly in dry, slightly acidic soil, making it common in southwest of USA, parts of Mexico, and Central and South America. |
| Histoplasma capsulatum: | Ohio, central Mississippi River Valley, and Appalachian Mountains. |
| Cryptococcus spp. | Cryptococcus neoformans is distributed worldwide with the following specifics:
|
| Paracoccidioides brasiliensi | Subtropical areas of Central and South America. |
| Hyalohyphomycoses | There are numerous molds in this group, including Aspergillus, Scedosporium, and Fusarium species. It has a worldwide distribution. |
| Candida species | Worldwide distribution |
| Sporothrix schenckii | Worldwide distribution |

References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 C. neoformans Infection Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). http://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/cryptococcosis-neoformans/statistics.html Accessed on December 31, 2015
- ↑ “C. neoformans Infection Statistics | Fungal Diseases | CDC”.
- ↑ Mirza SA, Phelan M, Rimland D, Graviss E, Hamill R, Brandt ME; et al. (2003). “The changing epidemiology of cryptococcosis: an update from population-based active surveillance in 2 large metropolitan areas, 1992-2000”. Clin Infect Dis. 36 (6): 789–94. doi:10.1086/368091. PMID 12627365.
- ↑ Park BJ, Wannemuehler KA, Marston BJ, Govender N, Pappas PG, Chiller TM (2009). “Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS”. AIDS. 23 (4): 525–30. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328322ffac. PMID 19182676.
- ↑ Koroshetz WJ. Chapter 382. Chronic and Recurrent Meningitis. In: Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Risk factors for the development of cryptococcal infection include being immunocompromised and inhalational exposure (most commonly from dry bird droppings).
Risk Factors
Risk factors for the development of cryptococcal infection include:
- Being immunocompromised, such as having advanced HIV/AIDS (CD4 <100 cells/mm), organ transplantation, invasive cancer, or intake of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications.[1][2][3]
- Cryptococcus is ubiquitous in the environment, but inhalational exposure to dry bird droppings or guano (excrement of seabirds or cave-dwelling bats) increases the risk of contracting the disease if a patient is immunocompromised.
- Smoking and outdoor occupations are considered risk factors for inhalational exposure.[4]
- Taking high-dose corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies such as alemtuzumab or infliximab, or other immunosuppressive agents.
References
- ↑ Lin YY, Shiau S, Fang CT (2015). “Risk factors for invasive Cryptococcus neoformans diseases: a case-control study”. PLoS One. 10 (3): e0119090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119090. PMC 4352003. PMID 25747471.
- ↑ C. neoformans Infection Risk & Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). http://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/cryptococcosis-neoformans/risk-prevention.html. Accessed on December 30, 2015.
- ↑ MacDougall L, Fyfe M, Romney M, Starr M, Galanis E (2011). “Risk factors for Cryptococcus gattii infection, British Columbia, Canada” Check
|url=value (help). Emerg Infect Dis. 17 (2): 193–9. doi:10.3201/eid1702.101020. PMC 3204768. PMID 21291588. - ↑ Hajjeh RA, Conn LA, Stephens DS, Baughman W, Hamill R, Graviss E; et al. (1999). “Cryptococcosis: population-based multistate active surveillance and risk factors in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons. Cryptococcal Active Surveillance Group”. J Infect Dis. 179 (2): 449–54. doi:10.1086/314606. PMID 9878030.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.
Overview
Asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia is very common in areas with endemic HIV/AIDS, and is associated with increased mortality and incidence of cryptococcal meningitis. Screening is not recommended for HIV/AIDS patients in the United States or Europe. However, screening may be beneficial in countries with limited HAART availability, high levels of antiretroviral drug resistance, and a high burden of disease. In the absence of symptoms, positive cryptococcal antigenemia should be treated with fluconazole 400 mg orally, once daily.
Screening
Methods of Screening
- The majority of studies on cryptococcal screening have used cryptococcal antigen, also known as CrAg.[1]
- A dipstick test that requires a small blood sample can detect silent antigenemia with high sensitivity in less than 10 minutes and for a small cost (less than $2).[2][3]
Recommendations
- Cryptococcal meningitis commonly affects patients with a CD4 count of ≤ 100 cells/μl. Cryptococcal meningitis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in individuals affected by HIV. It is recommended that patients with a CD4 count of ≤ 100 cells/μl should have routine cryptococcal antigen screening. Patients with a positive result should be offered preemptive anti-fungal therapy.[4][5]
- Given that the efficacy of such an approach has not been thoroughly studied, the Infectious Disease Society of America does not recommend routine screening for asymptomatic antigenemia in HIV-infected patients in the United States and Europe.
- However, the Infectious Disease Society of America recommends that areas with limited HAART availability, high levels of antiretroviral drug resistance, and a high burden of disease should consider screening.
- In the case of asymptomatic antigenemia, a lumbar puncture and a blood culture are recommended.
- Positive results should warrant treatment as symptomatic meningoencephalitis and/or disseminated disease, if any signs/symptoms are present.
- However, without evidence of meningoencephalitis, patients should be treated with fluconazole 400 mg orally, once daily.[6]
- Early studies demonstrated that asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia can be detected in up to 12% of patients with HIV/AIDS in endemic regions.
- Cryptococcus neoformans was also demonstrated by direct microscopy and culture in the cerebrospinal fluid of approximately 2/3 of patients.[7]
- Further studies conducted in endemic regions in Africa (south Africa, Uganda) demonstrated that asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia ranged from 7 to 38%.[8][9]
- Asymptomatic antigenemia was also demonstrated to be an independent predictor of mortality among these patients, and, during the first year of ART. An antigen titer greater than 1:8 was 100% sensitive and 96% specific for predicting the incidence of cryptococcal meningitis.[9]
- These alarming findings raised a question about the possibility of developing screening programs among high risk HIV/AIDS patients and providing patients with fluconazole prophylaxis that decreases the risk of active infections.
- The limited body of evidence suggests that screening and treatment reduces the incidence of cryptococcal meningitis and death in patients with AIDS.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kaplan JE, Vallabhaneni S, Smith RM, Chideya-Chihota S, Chehab J, Park B (2015). “Cryptococcal antigen screening and early antifungal treatment to prevent cryptococcal meningitis: a review of the literature”. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 68 Suppl 3: S331–9. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000484. PMID 25768872.
- ↑ Preventing Deaths Due to Cryptococcus with Targeted Screening. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). http://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/cryptococcosis-neoformans/screening.html. Accessed on December 20, 2015
- ↑ Kabanda T, Siedner MJ, Klausner JD, Muzoora C, Boulware DR (2014). “Point-of-care diagnosis and prognostication of cryptococcal meningitis with the cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay on cerebrospinal fluid”. Clin Infect Dis. 58 (1): 113–6. doi:10.1093/cid/cit641. PMC 3864499. PMID 24065327.
- ↑ Cassim N, Schnippel K, Coetzee LM, Glencross DK (2017). “Establishing a cost-per-result of laboratory-based, reflex Cryptococcal antigenaemia screening (CrAg) in HIV+ patients with CD4 counts less than 100 cells/μl using a Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) at a typical busy CD4 laboratory in South Africa”. PLoS One. 12 (2): e0171675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171675. PMID 28166254.
- ↑ Greene G, Sriruttan C, Le T, Chiller T, Govender NP (2017). “Looking for fungi in all the right places: screening for cryptococcal disease and other AIDS-related mycoses among patients with advanced HIV disease”. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 12 (2): 139–147. doi:10.1097/COH.0000000000000347. PMID 28134711.
- ↑ Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ; et al. (2010). “Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america”. Clin Infect Dis. 50 (3): 291–322. doi:10.1086/649858. PMID 20047480.
- ↑ Desmet P, Kayembe KD, De Vroey C (1989). “The value of cryptococcal serum antigen screening among HIV-positive/AIDS patients in Kinshasa, Zaire”. AIDS. 3 (2): 77–8. PMID 2496722.
- ↑ Tassie JM, Pepper L, Fogg C, Biraro S, Mayanja B, Andia I; et al. (2003). “Systematic screening of cryptococcal antigenemia in HIV-positive adults in Uganda”. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 33 (3): 411–2. PMID 12843756.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Jarvis JN, Lawn SD, Vogt M, Bangani N, Wood R, Harrison TS (2009). “Screening for cryptococcal antigenemia in patients accessing an antiretroviral treatment program in South Africa”. Clin Infect Dis. 48 (7): 856–62. doi:10.1086/597262. PMC 2875173. PMID 19222372.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
C. neoformans can cause no infection, latent infection, or symptomatic disease. C. neoformans enters the body through the respiratory route. Infection can present as pneumonia-like illness with symptoms such as cough, fever, chest pain, and weight loss. If left untreated, C. neoformans can disseminate to the central nervous system and cause meningoencephalitis. Prognosis is poor without treatment, with a mortality rate reaching 10 to 30% within 3 weeks of presentation.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Natural History
Depending on the virulence of the yeast strain and the immune status of the host, C. neoformans can cause no infection, latent infection, or symptomatic disease. C. neoformans can present as pneumonia-like illness, with symptoms such as cough, fever, chest pain, and weight loss. If left untreated, C. neoformans can disseminate to the central nervous system and cause meningoencephalitis.[1]
Complications
Cryptococcosis may lead to the following complications:[2]
- Meningitis
- Disseminated cryptococcal infection
- Treatment of fungal meningitis in HIV-infected patients receiving HAART, organ transplantation, and pregnancy may result in immune reconstitution syndrome.[3][4][5][6]
Prognosis
Prior to the introduction of amphotericin B therapy, cryptococcal meningitis was almost always fatal. Now, although most of these patients can be cured with a course of intravenous amphotericin B, the optimum duration of therapy is often unclear, and there is still a significant percentage of early deaths and late treatment failure.[7][8][9]
- The mortality of cryptococcal meningitis is high (10-30%).[10]
- Increasing levels of the following worsens the prognosis of HIV-negative cryptococcal meningitis patients with acute/subacute onset:
- Ratio of CSF glucose/blood glucose
- Impaired consciousness
- Hospitalization duration
References
- ↑ Schop J (2007). “Protective immunity against cryptococcus neoformans infection”. Mcgill J Med. 10 (1): 35–43. PMC 2323542. PMID 18523595.
- ↑ Jarvis JN, Harrison TS (2008). “Pulmonary cryptococcosis”. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 29 (2): 141–50. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1063853. PMID 18365996.
- ↑ Singh N, Perfect JR (2007). “Immune reconstitution syndrome associated with opportunistic mycoses”. Lancet Infect Dis. 7 (6): 395–401. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70085-3. PMID 17521592.
- ↑ Jenny-Avital ER, Abadi M (2002). “Immune reconstitution cryptococcosis after initiation of successful highly active antiretroviral therapy”. Clin Infect Dis. 35 (12): e128–33. doi:10.1086/344467. PMID 12471589.
- ↑ Blanche P, Gombert B, Ginsburg C, Passeron A, Stubei I, Rigolet A; et al. (1998). “HIV combination therapy: immune restitution causing cryptococcal lymphadenitis dramatically improved by anti-inflammatory therapy”. Scand J Infect Dis. 30 (6): 615–6. PMID 10225395.
- ↑ Woods ML, MacGinley R, Eisen DP, Allworth AM (1998). “HIV combination therapy: partial immune restitution unmasking latent cryptococcal infection”. AIDS. 12 (12): 1491–4. PMID 9727570.
- ↑ Diamond RD, Bennett JE (1974). “Prognostic factors in cryptococcal meningitis. A study in 111 cases”. Ann Intern Med. 80 (2): 176–81. PMID 4811791.
- ↑ Lewis JL, Rabinovich S (1972). “The wide spectrum of cryptococcal infections”. Am J Med. 53 (3): 315–22. PMID 5054723.
- ↑ NEWCOMER VD, STERNBERG TH, WRIGHT ET, REISNER RM, McNALL EG, SORENSEN LJ (1960). “The treatment of systemic fungus infections with amphotericin B.” Ann N Y Acad Sci. 89: 221–39. PMID 13728643.
- ↑ Van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA et al. (1997) Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med, 337, 15–21.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
