Roseola
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]:Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Synonyms and keywords: Roseola infantum, exanthem subitum, sixth disease, 3 day rash, pseudorubella, exanthem criticum
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
Roseola is a disease of infants. It is characterized by an abrupt rise in body temperature to as high as 40°C (104°F) followed by a rapid drop to normal within the next 2–4 days which coincides with the appearance of an erythematous maculopapular skin rash that persists for 1–3 days. It is typically a benign disease which resolves without sequelae. Roseola disease is caused by Human herpes virus 6 (HHV6). HHV-6A and HHV-6B are two distinct species of HHV-6.
Historical perspective
For the first time, Zahorsky of St. Louis in 1910 described a febrile exanthem occurring in infants which he termed roseola. Human herpes virus 6 was first identified in 1986.
Classification
There is no established classification system for roseola.
Pathophysiology
Roseola has two phases, the febrile and the rash (maculopapular) phase. During the first phase, HHV6 replicates in salivary glands and is secreted as primary source of infection. After complete resolution of the febrile phase, due to the latency of the virus in the lymphocytes and monocytes, the rash phase begins. A more serious form of HHV 6 is seen in older children, immunocompromised adults and organ transplant patients.
Causes
Roseola is caused by Human herpes virus 6, a member of the Herpesvirales order, Herpesviridae family, Betaherpesvirinae subfamily, and Roseolovirus genus. Herpesviruses have a unique four-layered structure: a core containing the large, double-stranded DNA genome is enclosed by an icosapentahedral capsid which is composed of capsomers. The capsid is surrounded by an amorphous protein coat called the tegument. It is encased in a glycoprotein-bearing lipid bilayer envelope.
Differential diagnosis
Roseola must be differentiated from other diseases that cause fever and rash, such as Rubella (german measles), Rubeola (measles), hand foot and mouth disease caused by coxsackie virus, erythema infectiosum caused by parvovirus B19, scarlet fever and even drug allergy.
Epidemiology and demographics
There is no accurate data for the prevalence or incidence of roseola. This is because the disease is a self limiting disease and it is under reported in most cases. Roseola is an illness of young children, with a peak prevalence between 7 and 13 months. Ninety percent of cases occur in children younger than two years. Roseola occurs equally in boys and girls. It occurs throughout the year, although outbreaks may occur in groups according to season
Risk factors
The common risk factors in the development of roseola includes infancy (younger 2 years), immunosuppression, and organ transplantation.
Screening
According to the USPSTF, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for roseola.
Natural history complications and prognosis
The symptoms of roseola usually starts in the first 2 years of life of an infant. If roseola, left untreated, it will resolve by itself. In rare cases, febrile seizures, encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, thrombocytopenic purpura, bone marrow failure and pneumonitis. The overall prognosis of roseola is very good.
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
The hallmark of roseola is a non pruritic macular or maculopapular rash. A positive history of a high fever of 40ºC (104ºF) that lasts for 3 to 5 days.
Physical Examination
Physical examination findings in a patient with roseola will depend on the presenting phase (febrile or rash). Vital signs are affected in the febrile phase and stabilize in the rash phase. Conversely, in the rash phase, vital signs become normal while skin appearance is affected.
Laboratory Findings
The diagnosis of roseola is made clinically. However, in atypical cases, the diagnosis can be made by both serologic and direct detection of HHV6 virus in the saliva of the patient. Expected results of diagnostic studies include antigen detection, PCR, and immunofluorescence.
Electrocardiogram
There are no electrocardiogram findings associated with roseola.
Chest X Ray
There are no chest x ray findings associated with roseola.
MRI
There are no MRI findings associated with roseola.
Echocardiography or ultrasound
There are no echocardiography or ultrasound findings associated with roseola.
Other imaging findings
There are no other imaging findings associated with roseola.
Other diagnostic studies
There are no other diagnostic studies associated with roseola.
Treatment
Medical therapy
There is no treatment for roseola; it is a self limiting disease that resolves on its own without any medical intervention but antipyretics can be used as a supportive therapy in cases of high fever.[1]
Surgery
Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of roseola.
Primary prevention
There is no established method of prevention of roseola. However, standard sanitary procedures such as hand washing can help prevent the spread of the HHV 6 virus.
Secondary prevention
There are no secondary preventive measures available for roseola.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
For the first time, Zahorsky of St. Louis in 1910 described a febrile exanthem occurring in infants which he termed roseola. Human herpes virus 6 was first identified in 1986.
Historical Perspective
- For the first time, Zahorsky of St. Louis in 1910 described a febrile exanthem occurring in infants which he termed roseola.
- In 1986, Human herpes virus 6 (HHV6), the main causative agent of roseola disease was first isolated from patients who were diagnosed with HIV AIDS or a lymphoproliferative disorder from the peripheral blood leukocytes. [1]
- The two different variants of HHV 6 discovered by Frenkel, Ablashi and Aubin are variant A and Variant B HHV 6 strains.[2][3][4]
- HHV 6A has been found to be more associated with the development of roseola.
References
- ↑ Salahuddin SZ, Ablashi DV, Markham PD, Josephs SF, Sturzenegger S, Kaplan M; et al. (1986). “Isolation of a new virus, HBLV, in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders”. Science. 234 (4776): 596–601. PMID 2876520.
- ↑ Schirmer EC, Wyatt LS, Yamanishi K, Rodriguez WJ, Frenkel N (1991). “Differentiation between two distinct classes of viruses now classified as human herpesvirus 6”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 88 (13): 5922–6. PMC 51990. PMID 1648234.
- ↑ Ablashi DV, Balachandran N, Josephs SF, Hung CL, Krueger GR, Kramarsky B; et al. (1991). “Genomic polymorphism, growth properties, and immunologic variations in human herpesvirus-6 isolates”. Virology. 184 (2): 545–52. PMID 1653487.
- ↑ Aubin JT, Collandre H, Candotti D, Ingrand D, Rouzioux C, Burgard M; et al. (1991). “Several groups among human herpesvirus 6 strains can be distinguished by Southern blotting and polymerase chain reaction”. J Clin Microbiol. 29 (2): 367–72. PMC 269769. PMID 1848868.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
There is no established classification system for roseola.
Classification
There is no established classification system for roseola.
References
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
Roseola has two phases, the febrile and the rash (maculopapular) phase. During the first phase, HHV6 replicates in salivary glands and is secreted as primary source of infection. After completes resolution of the febrile phase, due to the latency of the virus in the lymphocytes and monocytes, the rash phase begins.
Pathophysiology
Roseola has two phases:
Transmission of infection
The febrile phase
- HHV 6 virus is replicated in the salivary glands and secreted in saliva in the primary infection.[1]
- Intrauterine transmission was suggested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity of uncultured cord blood mononuclear cells.[2]
- CNS invasion is believed to occur in rare cases accounting for some of the CNS manifestations such as febrile seizures.[3]
The rash phase
- In the second phase of the disease, the HHV 6 virus is found to remain latent in lymphocytes and monocytes and found in low levels in some tissues. CD4 positive T cells have been found to support the growth of roseola.[1][4]
Pathogenesis
- Infection of the CD134 cells has been shown in some studies to be responsible for the reactivation of HHV 6 from latency in vitro.
- The human herpes virus infects the T cells, monocytes–macrophages, epithelial cells, and central nervous system cells resulting in a lifelong latency or persistence of virus at multiple sites. HHV-6 exists in a true state of viral latency in monocytes and macrophages.[4]
- HHV-6 has tropism towards CD4 T cells and replicates in the T cells inducing a lifelong latent infection in humans.
Genetics
Chromosomal integration of HHV-6A and HHV-6B is responsible for transmission of infection from the parents to the newborn and is observed in 1% of the population.
Associated conditions
A more serious form of HHV 6 is seen in older children, immunocompromised adults and organ transplant patients.
Gross pathology
There are no gross pathologic findings associated with roseola.
Microscopic pathology
There are no microscopic findings associated with roseola.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 JURETIC M (1963). “Exanthema subitum a review of 243 cases”. Helv Paediatr Acta. 18: 80–95. PMID 13958107.
- ↑ Asano Y, Yoshikawa T, Suga S, Kobayashi I, Nakashima T, Yazaki T; et al. (1994). “Clinical features of infants with primary human herpesvirus 6 infection (exanthem subitum, roseola infantum)”. Pediatrics. 93 (1): 104–8. PMID 8265302.
- ↑ Stoeckle MY (2000). “The spectrum of human herpesvirus 6 infection: from roseola infantum to adult disease”. Annu Rev Med. 51: 423–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.423. PMID 10774474.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 BERENBERG W, WRIGHT S, JANEWAY CA (1949). “Roseola infantum (exanthem subitum)”. N Engl J Med. 241 (7): 253–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM194908182410701. PMID 18138680.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
Roseola may be caused by either Human herpes virus 6A, 6B and 7 (HHV6A, HHV6B and HHV 7). The most common cause is HHV6B. Other causes include enteroviruses (Coxsackie A and B, echoviruses), adenoviruses and parainfluenza viruses.
Causes
- Roseola may be caused by Human herpes virus 6A, 6B and 7 (HHV6A, HHV6B and HHV 7). Other causes include enteroviruses (Coxsackie A and B, echoviruses), adenoviruses and parainfluenza viruses.[1]
- Roseola belongs to the Roseolovirus genus of the Betaherpesviridnae subfamily.
- HHV-6B causes exanthema subitum.[2]
References
- ↑ Tanaka K, Kondo T, Torigoe S, Okada S, Mukai T, Yamanishi K (1994). “Human herpesvirus 7: another causal agent for roseola (exanthem subitum)”. J Pediatr. 125 (1): 1–5. PMID 8021757.
- ↑ Agut H, Bonnafous P, Gautheret-Dejean A (2017). “Update on infections with human herpesviruses 6A, 6B, and 7”. Med Mal Infect. 47 (2): 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2016.09.004. PMID 27773488.
Differentiating Any Disease from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
Roseola must be differentiated from other diseases that cause fever and rash, such as Rubella (german measles), Rubeola (measles), hand foot and mouth disease caused by coxakie virus, erythema infectiosum caused by parvovirus B19, scarlet fever and even drug allergy.
Differential diagnosis
Roseola, also known as Exanthem subitum must be differentiated from all other childhood diseases that cause rash, and fever. The following table summarizes the differential diagnosis for roseola.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
| Disease | Cause | Typical Age | Prodrome | Fever | Duration of the rash (days) | Workup | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roseola Infantum (exanthem subitum) | Human herpes virus type 6 | 6 months to 2 years | None | High | 1-2; it follows defervescence | Discrete erythematous macules, rarely involves face, begins as fever ends | Lymphadenopathy, irritability |
| Measles | Paramyxovirus Measles virus |
1 to 20 years | 2-4 days of cough, conjunctivitis, and coryza | High | 5 – 6 | Erythematous, irregular size, maculopapular; starts on temples and behind ears; progresses down from face; fades to brownish | Koplik’s spots: C blue-white papules (salt grains) on bright red mucosa opposite premolar teeth |
| Rubella | Togavirus | 7 months to 29 years | 0 – 4 days; mild malaise, fever; absent in children | Low grade | 1 – 3 | Discrete, rose-pink, diffuse, maculopapular; progresses downward from face, may change quickly | Arthralgia (usually in adults), tender posterior cervical and suboccipital lymphadenopathy, malaise, petechiae on soft palate |
| Erythema Infectiosum (Fifth Disease) | Human parvovirus type B19 | 5 – 10 years | None, usually in children, may occur in adults | None to low-grade | 2 – 4 | Starts as “slapped cheek”, maculopapular; progresses to reticular (lacy) pattern; can recur with environmental changes such as sunlight exposure | Arthralgia/arthritis in adults, adenopathy |
| Infectious Mononucleosis | Epstein-Barr Virus | 10 – 30 years | 2 – 5 days of malaise and fatigue | Low to high | 2 – 7 | Trunk and proximal extremities. Rash common if Ampicillin given | Pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, malaise |
| Kawasaki disease | Unknown | < 5 years | 3 days of abrupt fever | High; fever of 5 days is a diagnostic criteria | 5 – 7 | Erythematous, morbilliform, maculopapular or scarlatiniform, central distribution; erythematous, indurated palms and soles | Acute: dry, fissured and injected lips, strawberry tongue; irritability; cervical lymphadenopathy; conjunctival injection; peripheral edema; Subacute: finger-tip desquamation; Complications: arthritis, carditis |
| Scarlet Fever | ß-hemolytic streptococci | > 2 years | 0 – 6 day, marked | Low to high | 2 – 7 | Scarlet “sunburn” with punctate papules “sandpaper”, circumoral pallor, increased intensity in skin folds, blanches stars face/head, upper trunk and progresses downward | Sore throat, exudative tonsillitis, vomiting, abdominal pain, lmphadenopathy, white then red strawberry tongue |
| Enterovirus | Echovirus Coxsackie virus |
Mainly childhood | 0 – 1 day fever and myalias | Low to high | 1 – 5 | Fine, pink, always affects face; variant is Boston exanthem (large ~ 1 cm, discrete maculopapules) | Sore throat, headache, malaise, no lymphadenopathy, gastroenteritis |
| Dengue Fever | Flavivirus Dengue virus types 1 – 4 |
None | High | 1 – 5 | Generalized maculopapular rash after defervescence; spares palms and soles | Headache, myalgia, abdominal pain, pharyngitis, vomiting | |
| Drug induced rash | Many | Any | Possible due to underlying illness | Possible | Varies | Typically diffuse but may be concentrated in diaper area, typically no progression, erythema multiform rash can progress over a few days | Possibly due to underlying illness or complications |
| Pharyngoconjunctival Fever | Adenovirus types 2, 3, 4, 7, 7a | < 5 years | Low to high | 3 – 5 | Starts on face and spreads down to trunk and extremities | Sore throat, conjunctivitis, headache, anorexia |
Table adapted from CDC Pinkbook.[9]
References
- ↑ JURETIC M (1963). “Exanthema subitum a review of 243 cases”. Helv Paediatr Acta. 18: 80–95. PMID 13958107.
- ↑ Robbins, Frederick C. (1962). “Measles: Clinical Features”. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 103 (3): 266. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1962.02080020278018. ISSN 0002-922X.
- ↑ Thompson, Amy E. (2015). “Recognizing Measles”. JAMA. 313 (15): 1584. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1889. ISSN 0098-7484.
- ↑ Kaplan, Leonard J. (1992). “Severe Measles in Immunocompromised Patients”. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 267 (9): 1237. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480090085032. ISSN 0098-7484.
- ↑ Ratnam S, Gadag V, West R, Burris J, Oates E, Stead F; et al. (1995). “Comparison of commercial enzyme immunoassay kits with plaque reduction neutralization test for detection of measles virus antibody”. J Clin Microbiol. 33 (4): 811–5. PMC 228046. PMID 7790442.
- ↑ Papania, Mark J.; Wallace, Gregory S.; Rota, Paul A.; Icenogle, Joseph P.; Fiebelkorn, Amy Parker; Armstrong, Gregory L.; Reef, Susan E.; Redd, Susan B.; Abernathy, Emily S.; Barskey, Albert E.; Hao, Lijuan; McLean, Huong Q.; Rota, Jennifer S.; Bellini, William J.; Seward, Jane F. (2014). “Elimination of Endemic Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome From the Western Hemisphere”. JAMA Pediatrics. 168 (2): 148. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4342. ISSN 2168-6203.
- ↑ Jayaprakash B, Sudha V, Shashikiran U (2006). “Atypical presentation of adult rubella”. Med J Malaysia. 61 (2): 242–4. PMID 16898322.
- ↑ Dimech, W.; Panagiotopoulos, L.; Marler, J.; Laven, N.; Leeson, S.; Dax, E. M. (2005). “Evaluation of Three Immunoassays Used for Detection of Anti-Rubella Virus Immunoglobulin M Antibodies”. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 12 (9): 1104–1108. doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005. ISSN 1556-6811.
- ↑ “Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases”.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
There is no accurate data for the prevalence or incidence of roseola. This is because the disease is a self limiting disease and it is under reported in most cases. Roseola is an illness of young children, with a peak prevalence between 7 and 13 months. Ninety percent of cases occur in children younger than two years. Roseola occurs equally in boys and girls. It occurs throughout the year, although outbreaks may occur in groups according to season .
Epidemiology and demographics
Prevalence
- There is no accurate data for the prevalence or incidence of roseola.
- More than 90% of adult populations in developed countries are seropositive for HHV 6.
Age
Roseola commonly affects young children between the ages of 7 and 13 months.[1]
Gender
- Males and females are affected equally by roseola.[2]
Race
- There is no racial predilection for roseola.
Developed countries
- HHV6 infection is nearly universal accounting for 10-45% of febrile illness in infants.
Developing countries
- There is a strong association of HHV 6A in Zambian children when compared to rest of the world.
References
- ↑ JURETIC M (1963). “Exanthema subitum a review of 243 cases”. Helv Paediatr Acta. 18: 80–95. PMID 13958107.
- ↑ Asano Y, Yoshikawa T, Suga S, Kobayashi I, Nakashima T, Yazaki T; et al. (1994). “Clinical features of infants with primary human herpesvirus 6 infection (exanthem subitum, roseola infantum)”. Pediatrics. 93 (1): 104–8. PMID 8265302.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
The common risk factors in the development of roseola includes infancy (younger 2 years), immunosuppression, and organ transplantation.
Risk factors
Risk factors predisposing to roseola infection include:
- Infancy: primary infection usually occurs in children less than 2 years of age
- Immunosuppression in adults with solid organ transplants and patients with HIV infection are at a higher risk of developing complications such as encephalitis.
References
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
According to the USPSTF, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for roseola.
Screening
According to the USPSTF, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for roseola.
References
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]
Overview
The symptoms of roseola usually starts in the first 2 years of life of an infant. If roseola is left untreated, it will resolve by itself. In rare cases, febrile seizures, encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, thrombocytopenic purpura, bone marrow failure and pneumonitis. The overall prognosis of roseola is very good.
Natural history, complications and prognosis
Natural history
- The symptoms of roseola usually start in the first 2 years of life of an infant. It starts as a high fever 40ºC (104ºF) which lasts for 3 to 5 days, as the fever abates, the child develops a non pruritic blanching papular or maculopapular rash that starts on the neck and progresses downward.[1]
- Roseola is a self limiting disease; if left untreated, it resolves without any sequelae.
Complications
Roseola is usually benign and self limited. However patients with HIV or immunosuppressed patients may experience reactivation of the virus and signs and symptoms such as:[1]
- Seizures ( generally related to fever)
- Aseptic meningitis
- Encephalitis
- Thrombocytopenic purpura
- Bone marrow failure
- Pneumonitis
Prognosis
The prognosis of roseola is good even without treatment. It is a self limiting disease, most children recover without any sequelae.[2][3]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 JURETIC M (1963). “Exanthema subitum a review of 243 cases”. Helv Paediatr Acta. 18: 80–95. PMID 13958107.
- ↑ Fölster-Holst R, Kreth HW (2009). “Viral exanthems in childhood–infectious (direct) exanthems. Part 2: Other viral exanthems”. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 7 (5): 414–9. doi:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2008.06869.x. PMID 18808380.
- ↑ Thomas, Emy Aby; John, Mary; Bhatia, Anuradha (2007). “Cutaneous manifestations of dengue viral infection in Punjab (north India)”. International Journal of Dermatology. 46 (7): 715–719. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03298.x. ISSN 0011-9059.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
