Sacrococcygeal teratoma
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[3]
Synonyms and keywords: Fetiform Teratoma, Fetus in fetu
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Sacrococcygel teratoma was first described by Stanley in 1842. In 1863, first successful surgery was performed on Sacrococcygeal teratoma by Dr. W. Blizard. Between 1950s and 1960s, germ cell theory of the origin of Sacrococcygeal teratoma was introduced.[1] Sacrococcygeal teratoma is one of the most common congenital tumors.[2] The incidence of Sacrococcygeal teratoma is estimated to be 1 in 35,000 births.[2] Sacrococcygeal teratoma is classified into four different categories according to American Academy of Pediatrics Surgery classification based upon the anatomical location of the tumor.[3][4] Subtypes of sacrococcygeal teratoma have different staging systems based on the size and growth of the tumor, lymph node involvement, and the presence of metastasis.[5] Sacrococcygeal teratoma originates from the pluripotent cells in primitive knot or Hensen’s node, which is the primary organizer of embryonic development, located on the anterior surface of the sacrum or coccyx by 2rd or 3rd gestational week.[6] Development of Sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and losses of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[7][8] The pathophysiology of sacrococcygeal teratoma depends on the histological subtype. Development of sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and losses of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[7][8] Sacrococcygeal teratoma must be differentiated from endodermal sinus tumor, ependymoma, fibromatosis, ganglioneuroma, giant cell tumor of the sacrum, leiomyoma, meningomyelocele, ovarian teratoma, neuroblastoma, retrorectal hamartoma, intracanalicular epidermoid tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, paraganglioma, dermal sinus stalk ascending towards the conus modulars, and hydromelia.[9] According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sacrococcygela teratoma.[10] The hallmark of sacrococcygeal teratoma is a protruding mass at the sacrococcygeal region. It is important to obtain the history about the onset, and the progression of the symptoms. Most common symptoms of sacrococcygeal teratoma are due to compression caused by the large tumor mass.[11] Patient with sacrococcygeal teratoma usually are generally well-appearanceing. Physical examination of patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma is usually remarkable for a protruding pre sacral mass.[12] Alpha-Fetoprotein and beta-hCG should be evaluated in patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma to determine the presence of malignant component of the tumor.[13] On x-ray, sacrococcygeal teratoma is characterized by a large mass projecting from the lower pelvic region or within the abdominopelvic cavity.[14] CT scan is not part of the routine investigation of sacrococcygeal teratoma. On CT scan, sacrococcygeal teratoma is characterized by bone, fat, and cystic components.[15] Ultrasound is used to diagnose Sacrococcygeal teratoma in second trimester.[16] Mature sacrococcygeal teratomas tend to be cystic, showing anechoic component. Immature sacrococcygeal teratomas are much rare and solid type, showing echogenic mass within the pelvis.[17] Echocardiography identifies high output cardiac state preceding hydrops fetalis.[18] Colour Doppler studies in sacrococcygeal teratoma may show marked hypervascularity with arterio-venous (AV) shunting.[19] There is no medical treatment for sacrococcygeal teratoma; the mainstay of therapy is surgical.[20] Perinatal surgical intervention is used to decrease cardiovascular complications caused by the large sacrococcygeal teratoma.[21] Early complete resection is the mainstay of management of benign tumor. Complete surgical excision in malignant sacrococcygeal teratoma is followed by platinum based chemotherapy.[22] Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. Most of the sacrococcygeal teratomas are benign in nature and prognosis is generally regarded as good after resection.[23] The sacrococcygeal teratoma with cystic morphology is associated with the most favorable prognosis.[24]
Historical Perspective
Sacrococcygel teratoma was first described by Stanley in 1842. In 1863, first successful surgery was performed on Sacrococcygeal teratoma by Dr. W. Blizard. Between 1950s and 1960s, germ cell theory of the origin of Sacrococcygeal teratoma was introduced.[1]
Classification
Sacrococcygeal teratoma is classified into four different categories according to American Academy of Pediatrics Surgery classification based upon the anatomical location of the tumor.[3][4] Subtypes of sacrococcygeal teratoma have different staging systems based on the size and growth of the tumor, lymph node involvement, and the presence of metastasis.[5]
Pathophysiology
Sacrococcygeal teratoma originates from the pluripotent cells in primitive knot or Hensen’s node, which is the primary organizer of embryonic development, located on the anterior surface of the sacrum or coccyx by 2rd or 3rd gestational week.[25] Development of Sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and losses of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[7][8] The pathophysiology of sacrococcygeal teratoma depends on the histological subtype.
Causes
Development of sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and losses of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[7][8]
Differential Diagnosis
Sacrococcygeal teratoma must be differentiated from endodermal sinus tumor, ependymoma, fibromatosis, ganglioneuroma, giant cell tumor of the sacrum, leiomyoma, meningomyelocele, ovarian teratoma, neuroblastoma, retrorectal hamartoma, intracanalicular epidermoid tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, paraganglioma, dermal sinus stalk ascending towards the conus modulars, and hydromelia.[26]
Epidemiology & Demographics
Sacrococcygeal teratoma is one of the most common congenital tumors.[2] The incidence of Sacrococcygeal teratoma is estimated to be 1 in 35,000 births.[2]
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for sacrococcygeal teratoma.
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sacrococcygela teratoma.[10]
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. Most of the sacrococcygeal teratomas are benign in nature and prognosis is generally regarded as good after resection.[27] The sacrococcygeal teratoma with cystic morphology is associated with the most favorable prognosis.[24]
History and Symptoms
The hallmark of sacrococcygeal teratoma is a protruding mass at the sacrococcygeal region. It is important to obtain the history about the onset, and the progression of the symptoms. Most common symptoms of sacrococcygeal teratoma are due to compression caused by the large tumor mass.[28]
Physical Examination
Patient with sacrococcygeal teratoma usually are generally well-appearanceing. Physical examination of patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma is usually remarkable for a protruding pre sacral mass.[29]
Laboratory tests
Alpha-Fetoprotein and beta-hCG should be evaluated in patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma to determine the presence of malignant component of the tumor.[13]
Pelvic X-Ray Findings in Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
On x-ray, sacrococcygeal teratoma is characterized by a large mass projecting from the lower pelvic region or within the abdominopelvic cavity.[30]
CT Findings in Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
CT scan is not part of the routine investigation of sacrococcygeal teratoma. On CT scan, sacrococcygeal teratoma is characterized by bone, fat, and cystic components.[31]
Ultrasound Findings in Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
Ultrasound is used to diagnose Sacrococcygeal teratoma in second trimester.[16] Mature sacrococcygeal teratomas tend to be cystic, showing anechoic component. Immature sacrococcygeal teratomas are much rare and solid type, showing echogenic mass within the pelvis.[32] Echocardiography identifies high output cardiac state preceding hydrops fetalis.[18]
Other Imaging Findings
Colour Doppler studies in sacrococcygeal teratoma may show marked hypervascularity with arterio-venous (AV) shunting.[33]
Medical Therapy
There is no medical treatment for sacrococcygeal teratoma; the mainstay of therapy is surgical.[34]
Surgery
Perinatal surgical intervention is used to decrease cardiovascular complications caused by the large sacrococcygeal teratoma.[35] Early complete resection is the mainstay of management of benign tumor. Complete surgical excision in malignant sacrococcygeal teratoma is followed by platinum based chemotherapy.[36]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Olson JS. The History of Cancer, An Annotated Bibliography. ABC-CLIO; 1989.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Sacrococcygeal Teratoma. Cincinnati Children’s (2015)http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/service/f/fetal-care/conditions/sct/default/ Accessed on November 24, 2015
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Puri P, Höllwarth ME. Pediatric Surgery, Diagnosis and Management. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Myers LB, Bulich LA. Anesthesia for Fetal Intervention and Surgery. PMPH-USA; 2005.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer, Principles & Practice of Oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
- ↑ http://www.hindawi.com/journals/criog/2012/131369/
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT (2006). “Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence”. Klin Padiatr. 218 (6): 296–302. doi:10.1055/s-2006-942271. PMID 17080330.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Veltman I, Veltman J, Janssen I, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Oosterhuis W, Schneider D, Stoop H, Gillis A, Zahn S, Looijenga L, Göbel U, van Kessel AG (2005). “Identification of recurrent chromosomal aberrations in germ cell tumors of neonates and infants using genomewide array-based comparative genomic hybridization”. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 43 (4): 367–76. doi:10.1002/gcc.20208. PMID 15880464.
- ↑ Myers LB, Bulich LA. Anesthesia for Fetal Intervention and Surgery. PMPH-USA; 2005.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Recommendations. US preventive services task force(2015) http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=sacrococcygeal+teratoma Accessed on November 25, 2015
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma/
- ↑ Mahour GH (1988). “Sacrococcygeal teratomas”. CA Cancer J Clin. 38 (6): 362–7. PMID 3141009.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Wu JT, Book L, Sudar K (1981). “Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels in normal infants”. Pediatr. Res. 15 (1): 50–2. PMID 6163129.
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Wilson RD, Hedrick H, Flake AW, Johnson MP, Bebbington MW, Mann S, Rychik J, Liechty K, Adzick NS (2009). “Sacrococcygeal teratomas: prenatal surveillance, growth and pregnancy outcome”. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 25 (1): 15–20. doi:10.1159/000188056.
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Adzick NS (2010). “Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies”. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 15 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2009.05.003. PMID 19540178.
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma/
- ↑ Roybal JL, Moldenhauer JS, Khalek N, Bebbington MW, Johnson MP, Hedrick HL, Adzick NS, Flake AW (2011). “Early delivery as an alternative management strategy for selected high-risk fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 46 (7): 1325–32. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.10.020. PMID 21763829.
- ↑ Marina NM, Cushing B, Giller R, Cohen L, Lauer SJ, Ablin A, Weetman R, Cullen J, Rogers P, Vinocur C, Stolar C, Rescorla F, Hawkins E, Heifetz S, Rao PV, Krailo M, Castleberry RP (1999). “Complete surgical excision is effective treatment for children with immature teratomas with or without malignant elements: A Pediatric Oncology Group/Children’s Cancer Group Intergroup Study”. J. Clin. Oncol. 17 (7): 2137–43. PMID 10561269.
- ↑ http://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma-sct/about#.VnhH0bRYZFI
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin EB, Vu L, Bratton B, Cedars E, Yoke L, Byrne F, Hirose S, Feldstein V, Miniati D, Lee H (2013). “Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 48 (6): 1225–31. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.016. PMID 23845611.
- ↑ http://www.hindawi.com/journals/criog/2012/131369/
- ↑ Myers LB, Bulich LA. Anesthesia for Fetal Intervention and Surgery. PMPH-USA; 2005.
- ↑ http://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma-sct/about#.VnhH0bRYZFI
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma/
- ↑ Mahour GH (1988). “Sacrococcygeal teratomas”. CA Cancer J Clin. 38 (6): 362–7. PMID 3141009.
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma/
- ↑ Roybal JL, Moldenhauer JS, Khalek N, Bebbington MW, Johnson MP, Hedrick HL, Adzick NS, Flake AW (2011). “Early delivery as an alternative management strategy for selected high-risk fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 46 (7): 1325–32. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.10.020. PMID 21763829.
- ↑ Marina NM, Cushing B, Giller R, Cohen L, Lauer SJ, Ablin A, Weetman R, Cullen J, Rogers P, Vinocur C, Stolar C, Rescorla F, Hawkins E, Heifetz S, Rao PV, Krailo M, Castleberry RP (1999). “Complete surgical excision is effective treatment for children with immature teratomas with or without malignant elements: A Pediatric Oncology Group/Children’s Cancer Group Intergroup Study”. J. Clin. Oncol. 17 (7): 2137–43. PMID 10561269.
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Sacrococcygel teratoma was first described by Stanley in 1842. In 1863, first successful surgery was performed on sacrococcygeal teratoma by Dr. W. Blizard. Between 1950s and 1960s, germ cell theory of the origin of sacrococcygeal teratoma was introduced.[1]
Historical Perspective
Discovery
- Teratoma is one of the oldest known tumor.[1]
- A 4000 year old Babylonian document mentions the first case of sacrococcygeal teratoma.
- 17th century: French obstetrician reported the first unquestionable teratoma.
- 1841: Typical sacrococcygeal teratoma was described in detail by Stanley.[1]
- 1863: The term “teratoma” was introduced by Rudolf Virchow.
- 1863: Dr. W. Blizard became the first surgeon to successfully operate on sacrococcygeal teratoma.
- 1884: Virchow referred to external sacrococcygeal teratoma growth as a “soft tail”.
- 1920: M.A. Perlstein, E. R. Le Count, and J. Bland-Sutton suggested sacrococcygeal teratoma as a suppressed twins or parasitic fetuses since teratomas have many well developed features as finger, nail, hair.
- 1920s: Paul Kraske perfected the surgical technique for removal of the sacrococcygeal teratoma.
- 1922: A. A. Law mentioned malignant degeneration of sacrococcygeal teratoma and called for the removal of the tumor.
- 1950s and 1960s: R.E. Gross, H. W. Clathworthy, I.A. Meeker, and G. V. Brindley hypothesized that teratoma originated from totipotential cells of Henson’s node.
- 1950s and 1960s: Germ cell theory of the sacrococcygeal teratoma origin was introduced.
References
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Sacrococcygeal teratoma is classified into four different categories according to the American academy of pediatrics surgery classification based upon the anatomical location of the tumor. Sub-types of sacrococcygeal teratoma have different staging systems based on the size and growth of the tumor, lymph node involvement, and the presence of metastasis.
Classification
Classification Based Upon Anatomical Location
American academy of pediatrics surgery section system classifies sacrococcygeal teratoma depending on the anatomical location of the tumor. [1][2]
| Stage | Features |
|---|---|
|
Type I |
|
|
Type II |
|
|
Type III |
|
|
Type IV |
|
Classification Based Upon Pathology
- Benign : Mature[1]
- Malignant : Immature
References
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Sacrococcygeal teratoma originates from the pluripotent cells in primitive knot or Hensen’s node, which is the primary organizer of embryonic development, located on the anterior surface of the sacrum or coccyx by the 2nd or 3rd gestational week. Development of sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and loss of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions. The pathophysiology of sacrococcygeal teratoma depends on the histological subtype.
Pathophysiology
Pathogenesis
- Sacrococcygeal teratoma originates from the pluripotent cells in primitive knot or Hensen’s node, which is the primary organizer of embryonic development, located on the anterior surface of the sacrum or coccyx by the 2nd or 3rd gestational week.[1]
Genetics
- Development of Sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and loss of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[2][3]
Associated Conditions
Following conditions are associated with sacrococcygeal teratoma:
- Myelomeningocoele[4]
- Vertebral anomalies
- Bladder outlet obstruction
- Hydronephrosis
- Rectal stenosis or atresia
- Intraocular teratoma[5]
- Hydrops fetalis
- Cardiomegaly due to vascular shunting and high output cardiac failure
- Tethered spinal cord[6]
Gross Pathology
-
Gross Image of Sacrococcygeal teratoma [Case courtesy of Dr Saeed Soltany Hosn, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 33220]
-
Gross Image of Sacrococcygeal teratoma [Image courtesy of Sinha S, Sarin YK, Deshpande VP]
-
Gross Image of Excised Sacrococcygeal teratoma[Image courtesy of Sinha S, Sarin YK, Deshpande VP]
Microscopic Pathology
Sacrococcygeal teratoma can be divided into following two types depending on the microscopic pathology: [7]
Mature Teratoma
Immature Teratoma
- Malignant
- Consists of small fraction of incompletely differentiated tissue
- They have elevated tumor markers including yolk sac component secreting alpha fetoprotein or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET).
References
- ↑ Sacrococcygeal teratoma. Hindawi (2015)http://www.hindawi.com/journals/criog/2012/131369/ Accessed on December 15th, 2015
- ↑ Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT (2006). “Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence”. Klin Padiatr. 218 (6): 296–302. doi:10.1055/s-2006-942271. PMID 17080330.
- ↑ Veltman I, Veltman J, Janssen I, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Oosterhuis W, Schneider D, Stoop H, Gillis A, Zahn S, Looijenga L, Göbel U, van Kessel AG (2005). “Identification of recurrent chromosomal aberrations in germ cell tumors of neonates and infants using genomewide array-based comparative genomic hybridization”. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 43 (4): 367–76. doi:10.1002/gcc.20208. PMID 15880464.
- ↑ Sacrococcygel Teratoma. Radiopedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma Accessed on December 15, 2015
- ↑ Kristen E. Zhelnin, Grant M. Gebhard, David M. Mirsky, Scott Cn Oliver, Mark A. Lovell, Csaba Galambos, Timothy M. Crombleholme & Emily A. McCourt (2017). “Pediatric Intraocular Immature Teratoma Associated With Sacrococcygeal Teratoma”. Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society. 20 (3): 240–244. doi:10.1177/1093526616686233. PMID 28521629. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Tugba Sarac Sivrikoz, Recep Has, Aytul Corbacioglu Esmer, Ibrahim Kalelioglu, Atil Yuksel & Orhun Cig Taskin (2016). “Prenatal diagnosis of tethered spinal cord associated with sacrococcygeal teratoma”. Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU. 44 (8): 506–509. doi:10.1002/jcu.22344. PMID 26892808. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Calaminus G, Schneider DT, Bökkerink JP, Gadner H, Harms D, Willers R, Göbel U (2003). “Prognostic value of tumor size, metastases, extension into bone, and increased tumor marker in children with malignant sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors: a prospective evaluation of 71 patients treated in the German cooperative protocols Maligne Keimzelltumoren (MAKEI) 83/86 and MAKEI 89”. J. Clin. Oncol. 21 (5): 781–6. PMID 12610174.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Development of sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and loss of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.
Causes
Development of sacrococcygeal teratoma is associated with gain of chromosomes 1q32-qter regions and loss of the 6q24-qter and 18q21-qter regions.[1][2]
References
- ↑ Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT (2006). “Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence”. Klin Padiatr. 218 (6): 296–302. doi:10.1055/s-2006-942271. PMID 17080330.
- ↑ Veltman I, Veltman J, Janssen I, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Oosterhuis W, Schneider D, Stoop H, Gillis A, Zahn S, Looijenga L, Göbel U, van Kessel AG (2005). “Identification of recurrent chromosomal aberrations in germ cell tumors of neonates and infants using genomewide array-based comparative genomic hybridization”. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 43 (4): 367–76. doi:10.1002/gcc.20208. PMID 15880464.
Differentiating Sacrococcygeal teratoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Sacrococcygeal teratoma must be differentiated from endodermal sinus tumor, ependymoma, fibromatosis, ganglioneuroma, giant cell tumor of the sacrum, leiomyoma, meningomyelocele, ovarian teratoma, neuroblastoma, retrorectal hamartoma, intracanalicular epidermoid tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, paraganglioma, dermal sinus stalk ascending towards the conus modullaris, and hydromelia.[1]
Differenting Sacrococcygeal Teratoma from other Diseases
- Endodermal sinus tumor [1]
- Ependymoma
- Fibromatosis
- Ganglioneuroma
- Giant cell tumor of the sacrum
- Leiomyoma
- Meningomyelocele
- Ovarian teratoma
- Neuroblastoma
- Retrorectal hamartoma
- Intracanalicular epidermoid tumor
- Rhabdomyosarcoma
- Paraganglioma
- Dermal sinus stalk ascending towards the conus modullaris
- Hydromelia
- Sacrococcygeal teratoma must be differentiated from other diseases that causes vertebral column defects, spinal deformity and neurologic abnormalities or gait abnormalities, such as: Terminal myelocystocele, spine segmental dysgenesis, Caudal regression syndrome (sacral agenesis), multiple vertebral segmentation disorder, VACTERL association, arnold-chiari malformation, syringomyelia, Scoliosis, and leg length discrepancy.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
| Diseases | Clinical manifestations | Para-clinical findings | Gold standard | Additional findings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical examination | |||||||
| Imaging | |||||||
| Vertebra column defect | Protrusions, Dimples, Hair patch in the spine | Motor and sensory abnormalities | X-ray
(PA and Lateral view) |
M.R.I. | |||
| Sacrococcygeal teratoma | +/- | ++ | +/- |
|
|
Ultrasound | |
| Spina bifida | ++ | ++ | +/- | Incomplete union of the posterior elements of vertebral levels |
|
MRI | – |
| Terminal myelocystocele | +/- | Protrusions and dimples | +/- | Incomplete union of the posterior elements of vertebral levels |
|
MRI |
|
| Spine segmental dysgenesis | + | – | +/- | Defects in the segments of the spine and spinal cord |
|
MRI |
|
| Caudal regression syndrome (sacral agenesis) | + | +/- | +/- | Agenesis of the sacrum and lumbar spine |
|
MRI | Associated with other developmental malformations (orthopedic, neurological, genito-urinary, gastrointestinal…)
|
| VACTERL association | + | +/- | +/- | Vertebral body dysgenesis/hypogenesis | – | MRI, Ct scan, X ray | VACTERL stands for:
|
| Arnold-chiari malformation | + | + | + | None | MRI |
| |
| Syringomyelia | + | + | + |
|
MRI |
| |
| Scoliosis | +/- | +/- | +/- |
|
MRI |
| |
| Leg length discrepancy | – | – | – |
|
None | Orthoroentogram | |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Myers LB, Bulich LA. Anesthesia for Fetal Intervention and Surgery. PMPH-USA; 2005.
- ↑ Calloni SF, Huisman TA, Poretti A, Soares BP (2017). “Back pain and scoliosis in children: When to image, what to consider”. Neuroradiol J. 30 (5): 393–404. doi:10.1177/1971400917697503. PMC 5602330. PMID 28786774.
- ↑ Azar, F., Canale, S., Beaty, J. & Campbell, W. (2017). Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Page: 1898-2028.
- ↑ Meyer SH, Morris GF, Pretorius DH, James HE (March 1998). “Terminal myelocystocele: important differential diagnosis in the prenatal assessment of spina bifida”. J Ultrasound Med. 17 (3): 193–7. PMID 9514174.
- ↑ Scott RM, Wolpert SM, Bartoshesky LE, Zimbler S, Karlin L (April 1988). “Segmental spinal dysgenesis”. Neurosurgery. 22 (4): 739–44. PMID 3374785.
- ↑ Kremser E, Mitchell GM (February 1971). “Treatment of primary dysmenorrhea with a combined type oral contraceptive–a double blind study”. J Am Coll Health Assoc. 19 (3): 195–6. PMID 4925436.
- ↑ Benedetti-Valentino F J, De Feo V, Pistolese GR, Fiorani P (September 1966). “[Nephroptosis and fibromuscular hyperplasia of the tunica media of the renal arteries]”. Minerva Cardioangiol (in Italian). 14 (9): 528–34. PMID 5991006. Vancouver style error: name (help)
- ↑ Naccarato R, Sturniolo GC, Martin A, D’Odorico A, Montino C (March 1988). “[Irritable bowel syndrome]”. G Clin Med (in Italian). 69 (3): 163–8. PMID 3169446.
- ↑ Sacrococcygel Teratoma. Radiopedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/sacrococcygeal-teratoma Accessed on December 15, 2015
- ↑ Danzer E, Hubbard AM, Hedrick HL, Johnson MP, Wilson RD, Howell LJ, Flake AW, Adzick NS (2006). “Diagnosis and characterization of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma with prenatal MRI”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 187 (4): W350–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0152. PMID 16985105.
Template:Congenital malformations and deformations of nervous system Template:Tumors Template:Epithelial neoplasms Template:Pathology Template:Joints of torso
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
Sacrococcygeal teratoma is one of the most common congenital tumors. The incidence of sacrococcygeal teratoma, based on multiple studies conducted around the world, ranges from 3.5 – 9.3 per 100, 000 individuals. The prevalence of sacrococcygeal teratoma ranges from 1.4 – 3.3 per 100, 000 individuals. In a retrospective cohort study conducted in southern Sweden from 2000 to 2013, the overall mortality rate of sacrococcygeal teratoma was 11%. Sacrococcygeal teratoma affects neonates. There is no racial predilection to sacrococcygeal teratoma. The female to male ratio is approximately 4 to 1.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence
Below given table compares different studies on the incidence of sacrococcygeal teratoma
| Author | Study period | Country | Case number | Incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derikx 2006[1] | 1990 – 1999 | The Netherlands | 173 | 3.5/100,000 |
| *Forrester 2006[2] | 1986 – 2001 | USA, Hawaii | 22 | 4.29/100,000 |
| *Swamy 2008[3] | 1985 – 2006 | England | 28 | 3.6/100,000 |
| *Pauniaho 2013[4] | 1987 – 2008 | Finland | 124 | 9.3/100,000 |
| *Hambraeus 2015 | 2000 – 2013 | Sweden | 19 | 7.1/100,000 |
| *Included spontaneous abortions, terminations of pregnancy, and stillbirths | ||||
Prevalence
The prevalence of sacrococcygeal teratoma ranges from 1.4 – 3.3 per 100, 000 individuals.[5]
Mortality rate
In a retrospective cohort study conducted in southern Sweden from 2000 to 2013, the overall mortality rate of sacrococcygeal teratoma was 11%.[6]
Age
Race
There is no racial predilection to sacrococcygeal teratoma.
Gender
Women are more commonly affected by sacrococcygeal teratoma than men. The female to male ratio is approximately 4 to 1.[9]
References
- ↑ Derikx, J. P. M.; De Backer, A.; van de Schoot, L.; Aronson, D. C.; de Langen, Z. J.; van den Hoonaard, T. L.; Bax, N. M. A.; van der Staak, F.; van Heurn, L. W. E. (2006). “Factors associated with recurrence and metastasis in sacrococcygeal teratoma”. British Journal of Surgery. 93 (12): 1543–1548. doi:10.1002/bjs.5379. ISSN 0007-1323.
- ↑ Forrester, Mathias B.; Merz, Ruth D. (2006). “Descriptive epidemiology of teratoma in infants, Hawaii, 1986-2001”. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 20 (1): 54–58. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00678.x. ISSN 0269-5022.
- ↑ Swamy, Ravi; Embleton, Nicholas; Hale, Juliet (2008). “Sacrococcygeal teratoma over two decades: Birth prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and clinical outcomes”. Prenatal Diagnosis. 28 (11): 1048–1051. doi:10.1002/pd.2122. ISSN 0197-3851.
- ↑ Hambraeus, Mette; Arnbjörnsson, Einar; Börjesson, Anna; Salvesen, Kjell; Hagander, Lars (2016). “Sacrococcygeal teratoma: A population-based study of incidence and prenatal prognostic factors”. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 51 (3): 481–485. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.007. ISSN 0022-3468.
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/
- ↑ Mette Hambraeus, Einar Arnbjornsson, Anna Borjesson, Kjell Salvesen & Lars Hagander (2016). “Sacrococcygeal teratoma: A population-based study of incidence and prenatal prognostic factors”. Journal of pediatric surgery. 51 (3): 481–485. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.007. PMID 26454470. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ https://rarediseases.org/
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/
- ↑ https://rarediseases.org/
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
There are no established risk factors for sacrococcygeal teratoma.
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for sacrococcygeal teratoma.
References
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sacrococcygeal teratoma.[1]
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sacrococcygela teratoma.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Recommendations. US preventive services task force(2015) http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=sacrococcygeal+teratoma Accessed on November 25, 2015
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]
Overview
Depending on the extent of the tumor invasion at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. Most of the sacrococcygeal teratomas are benign in nature and prognosis is generally regarded as good after resection. The sacrococcygeal teratoma with cystic morphology is associated with the most favorable prognosis.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
Sacrococcygeal teratomas are the most common type of germ cell tumors (both benign and malignant) diagnosed in neonates, infants, and children younger than 4 years.[1]
Fetal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
- Found during prenatal ultrasonography, with or without maternal symptoms
- Tends to be small and partly or entirely external
- The internal sacrococcygeal teratomas are not easily seen via ultrasound, unless they are large enough to reveal their presence by the abnormal position of the fetal urinary bladder and other organs
- Large fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas frequently produce maternal complications which necessitate non-routine, investigative ultrasonography.
Neonatal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma
- The tumor presents as a protruding mass from the sacral region and is usually mature or immature teratoma.
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma in Infants and Young Children
- The tumor presents as a palpable mass in the sacro–pelvic region compressing the bladder or rectum.[2]
- These pelvic tumors have a greater likelihood of being malignant.
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma in Older Children and Adults
- The tumor may be mistaken for a pilonidal sinus, or it may be found during a rectal exam.[1]
Complications
Maternal Complications
- Mirror syndrome (also called Ballantynes syndrome) is generalized maternal edema that mirrors the edema of the hydropic fetus and placenta.[3]
- The need for Cesarean section[4]
- Preterm labor
Fetal Complications
- Steal Syndrome: Solid and rapidly growing sacrococcygeal teratoma is highly vascularized tumor and is more likely to divert blood from circulation, leading to fetal hydrops.
- Mass effects of a large sacrococcygeal teratoma may include hip dysplasia, bowel obstruction, urinary obstruction, hydronephrosis and hydrops fetalis.[5]
- Even a small sacrococcygeal teratoma can produce complications of mass effect, if it is pre-sacral (Altman Type IV).
- Severe hydronephrosis may contribute to inadequate lung development.
- The anus may be imperforated.
- Urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and other chronic problems resulting from accidental damage to nerves and muscles within the pelvis[6]
Complications Related to the Treatment
- Removal of the coccyx may include additional complications.
- The most frequent complication is an unsatisfactory appearance of the surgical scar.[7]
- Pelvic scarring may necessitate that pregnant women, who are sacrococcygeal teratoma survivors, deliver their babies by Cesarean section.
- If coccyx is not removed during surgery, the patient may have recurrence of the teratoma and metastatic cancer.[8]
- Bowel and bladder incontinence is observed due to soiling of the malignant cells.[9]
Prognosis
- Depending on the extent of the tumor invasion at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.
- Most of the sacrococcygeal teratomas are benign in nature and prognosis is generally regarded as good after resection of the tumor. [10]
Poor Prognostic Factors
- Ultrasound showing tumor volume to fetal weight ratio (TFR) > 0.12 before 24 weeks of gestation[11]
- Ultrasound showing TFR ≥ 0.11 before 32 weeks of gestation
- Solid tumor volume to head volume ratio > 1[12]
- Placentomegaly
- Solid and vascular tumor
- Hydrops fetalis
- High output cardiac failure[13]
Favorable Prognostic Factors
- Cystic morphology[11]
- Tumors at age < 2 months are usually benign.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Sacrococcygeal teratoma. Cancer.gov (2015)(PDQ) Sacrococcygeal Tumors in Children Accessed on November 2th, 2015
- ↑ Rescorla FJ: Pediatric germ cell tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 16 (2): 144-58, 1999. PUBMED Abstract
- ↑ Finamore PS, Kontopoulos E, Price M, Giannina G, Smulian JC (2007). “Mirror syndrome associated with sacrococcygeal teratoma: a case report”. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 52 (3): 225–7. PMID 17465292.
- ↑ Nalbanski B, Markov D, Brankov O (2007). “[Sacrococcygeal teratoma–a case report and literature review]”. Akusherstvo i ginekologii͡a (in Bulgarian). 46 (2): 41–5. PMID 17469451.
- ↑ Galili O, Mogilner J (2005). “Type IV sacrococcygeal teratoma causing urinary retention: a rare presentation”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 40 (2): E18–20. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.10.003. PMID 15750911.
- ↑ Engelskirchen R, Holschneider AM, Rhein R, Hecker WC, Höpner F (1987). “[Sacral teratomas in childhood. An analysis of long-term results in 87 children]”. Zeitschrift für Kinderchirurgie : organ der Deutschen, der Schweizerischen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft für Kinderchirurgie = Surgery in infancy and childhood (in German). 42 (6): 358–61. PMID 3439358.
- ↑ Surgical experience and cosmetic outcomes in children with sacrococcygeal teratoma. PubMed (2006) 16373161&dopt=AbstractPlus PubMed Accessed on November 24th, 2015
- ↑ Lack EE, Glaun RS, Hefter LG, Seneca RP, Steigman C, Athari F (1993). “Late occurrence of malignancy following resection of a histologically mature sacrococcygeal teratoma. Report of a case and literature review”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 117 (7): 724–8. PMID 8323438. Synopsis: A 40 year old man has widely metastatic adenocarcinoma arising from the residual coccyx remaining after surgical removal of an apparently benign SCT at age 2 months.
- ↑ Partridge EA, Canning D, Long C, Peranteau WH, Hedrick HL, Adzick NS, Flake AW (2014). “Urologic and anorectal complications of sacrococcygeal teratomas: prenatal and postnatal predictors”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 49 (1): 139–42, discussion 142–3. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.042. PMID 24439598.
- ↑ Sacrococcygeal teratoma. Chop.Edu (2015) http://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/sacrococcygeal-teratoma-sct/about#.VnhH0bRYZFI Accessed on November 24th, 2015
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin EB, Vu L, Bratton B, Cedars E, Yoke L, Byrne F, Hirose S, Feldstein V, Miniati D, Lee H (2013). “Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 48 (6): 1225–31. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.016. PMID 23845611.
- ↑ Sy ED, Filly RA, Cheong ML, Clifton MS, Cortes RA, Ohashi S, Takifuji K, Ventura DE, Grethel EJ, Wagner AJ, Gress EA, Ball RH, Lee H, Harrison MR (2009). “Prognostic role of tumor-head volume ratio in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma”. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 26 (2): 75–80. doi:10.1159/000238113. PMID 19752518.
- ↑ Seung Mi Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, So Yeon Kim, Min Kyoung Kim, Sohee Oh, Sang Hoon Song, Hyun-Young Kim, Chan-Wook Park, Joong Shin Park & Jong Kwan Jun (2018). “Antenatal Prediction of Neonatal Survival in Sacrococcygeal Teratoma”. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 37 (8): 2003–2009. doi:10.1002/jum.14553. PMID 29399854. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History & Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Tests | Pelvis X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH

![Gross Image of Sacrococcygeal teratoma [Case courtesy of Dr Saeed Soltany Hosn, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 33220]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/5/51/Sacrococcygeal-teratoma-6.jpg)
![Gross Image of Sacrococcygeal teratoma [Image courtesy of Sinha S, Sarin YK, Deshpande VP]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/4/43/5-261-1-PB.gif)
![Gross Image of Excised Sacrococcygeal teratoma[Image courtesy of Sinha S, Sarin YK, Deshpande VP]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/3/3f/5-262-1-PB.gif)