Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Alzheimer's disease

Template:DiseaseDisorder infobox

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2], Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3], Akshun Kalia M.B.B.S.[4], Amandeep Singh M.D.[5], Kiran Singh, M.D. [6], Haleigh Williams, B.S.

Synonyms and keywords: AD; Alzheimer’s; Alzheimer dementia; Alzheimer disease; Alzheimer sclerosis; Alzheimer’s syndrome; Alzheimer-type dementia; Presenile and senile dementia; Primary senile degenerative dementia; Senile dementia of the Alzheimer type; SDAT; Alzhiemer dementia; Alzhiemer’s; Alzheimer’s dementia care; Alzheimer’s caregiving

Overview


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia among older people. Dementia is a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills that interferes with a person’s daily life and activities. Other causes of dementia include blood vessel disease in the brain (called vascular dementia), Parkinson’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and Lewy body dementia. The first case of Alzheimer’s disease was described by a German psychiatrist named Alöis Alzheimer in the year 1901. For many decades after Alzheimer’s original description, there was little progress in defining the pathogenesis of AD occurred. In the mid 1970’s, it was found that the levels of acetylcholine decrease in brains of individuals undergoing neurodegeneration due to Alzheimer’s disease. In early 1980’s major advances in biochemistry and molecular genetics allowed the use of compositional analyses and immunocytochemistry to explain the structure of tangles and plaques found in the brains of Alzheimer patients. The term Alzheimer’s disease was subsequently formally adopted in medical nomenclature to describe individuals of all ages with a characteristic common symptom pattern, disease course, and neuropathology. Alzheimer’s disease may be classified according to severity into mild, moderate and severe dementia. It may also be classified based on age of onset into early onset and late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Another method of classification of Alzheimer’s disease is based on the course of disease into pre-dementia, early dementia, moderate dementia and advanced dementia. Alzheimer disease (AD), is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The dysfunction of amyloid precursor protien (APP) metabolism and the resulting build up of of Aβ peptides and their aggregation in the form of senile plaques in the brain parenchyma of individuals have been considered pivotal for neurodegeneration in the disease. Cognitive impairment in patients with AD is closely associated with synaptic loss in the neocortex and limbic system. The microscopic histopathological features of alzheimer’s disease consist of neurofibrillary tangles, senile plaques, neuronal loss, and with or without cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Alzheimer’s disease may be caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, familial inheritance of mutations in either presenilin 1 gene, presenilin 2 gene or APOE4 gene. Presenilin mutations are associated with early onset Alzheimer’s disease, whereas APOE mutations are associated with late onset disease. Environmental factors, such as aging, low level of education and head trauma may also contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s disease. An estimated 5.5 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s disease. An estimated 10,000 per 100,000 individuals aged greater than 65 years have been known to be living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. The diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is made on the basis of clinical criteria described by either the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) or DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition). Histopathologic examination for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease is rarely done. Elderly patients presenting with progressive decline in memory and other cognitive impairments such as aphasia, agnosia or apraxia should be suspected for Alzheimer’s disease. In these patients, mental status examination (MSE) and neuropsychological testing should be performed to further evaluate the status of cognitive abilities. Diagnostic tools for the examination of the patient include mini- mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MOCA) and instruments of activities of dailing living (IADL). Characteristic findings on MRI suggestive of Alzheimer’s disease include reduced hippocampal volume and medial temporal lobe atrophy. There is no known cure for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Available treatments offer relatively small symptomatic benefit but remain palliative in nature. Current treatments can be divided into pharmacologicalpsychosocial, and caregiving. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors increase the amount of acetylcholine in the brain and are a major part of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Major drugs include, donepezilrivastigmine and galantamine, these drugs help with the cognitive symptoms of the disease. Associated psychosis and depression may be managed with antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Caregiving plays a pivotal role in the management of patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

Historical Perspective

The first case of Alzheimer’s disease was described by a German psychiatrist named Alöis Alzheimer in the year 1901. For many decades after Alzheimer’s original description, there was little progress in defining the pathogenesis of AD occurred. In the mid 1970’s, it was found that the levels of acetylcholine decrease in brains of individuals undergoing neurodegeneration due to Alzheimer’s disease. In early 1980’s major advances in biochemistry and molecular genetics allowed the use of compositional analyses and immunocytochemistry to explain the structure of tangles and plaques found in the brains of Alzheimer patients. The term Alzheimer’s disease was subsequently formally adopted in medical nomenclature to describe individuals of all ages with a characteristic common symptom pattern, disease course, and neuropathology.

Classification

Alzheimer’s disease may be classified according to severity into mild, moderate and severe dementia. It may also be classified based on age of onset into early onset and late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Another method of classification of Alzheimer’s disease is based on the course of disease into pre-dementia, early dementia, moderate dementia and advanced dementia.

Pathophysiology

Alzheimer disease (AD), is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The dysfunction of amyloid precursor protien (APP) metabolism and the resulting build up of of Aβ peptides and their aggregation in the form of senile plaques in the brain parenchyma of individuals have been considered pivotal for neurodegeneration in the disease. Cognitive impairment in patients with AD is closely associated with synaptic loss in the neocortex and limbic system. In familial forms of AD, mutations result in an increased Aβ production or aggregation, in sporadic AD, failure of the clearance mechanisms might play a key role. Loss of mature neurons and alterations in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in areas such as the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus have been found to be responsible for manifestations of AD. On gross pathology, temporal atrophy (hippocampus in particular), dilation of lateral ventricles and third ventricle are characteristic findings of Alzheimer’s disease. The microscopic histopathological features of alzheimer’s disease consist neurofibrillary tangles, senile plaques, neuronal loss, and with or without cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

Causes

Alzheimer’s disease may be caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, familial inheritance of mutations in either presenilin 1 gene, presenilin 2 gene or APOE4 gene. Presenilin mutations are associated with early onset Alzheimer’s disease, whereas APOE mutations are associated with late onset disease. Environmental factors, such as aging, low level of education and head trauma may also contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Differentiating alzheimer’s disease from Other Diseases

Alzheimer’s disease must be differentiated from other causes of dementia which may share common characteristics of cognitive impairment. The differentials include, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia and frontotemporal dementia.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Alzheimer’s disease is the most frequently observed form of dementia, and it typically develops in elderly patients. An estimated 5.5 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s disease. An estimated 10,000 per 100,000 individuals aged greater than 65 years have been known to be living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Alzheimer’s disease has been known to affect females more than males. African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease than older whites. AD is diagnosed in people over 65 years of age, although the less prevalent early-onset Alzheimer’s can occur much earlier.

Risk Factors

The most potent risk factors for the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are age and genetic mutations. Females are more prone to development of Alzheimer’s disease. Inhabitants of Central African Republic, East Africa, Southern Africa, Malaysia, Australia, and Papua New Guinea are more predisposed to the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Stroke increases the risk of Alzheimer’s dementia.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a slow-progressing condition that involves complications such as the inability to take care of oneself. If left untreated, Alzheimer’s disease progresses from pre-clinical stage to advanced dementia. Common complications of Alzheimer’s disease include anosmiabedsorespsychosismalnutrition and dehydration. There is no cure for Alzheimer’s disease currently and the treatment focuses on symptomatic management of the disease.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is made on the basis of clinical criteria described by either the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) or DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition). Histopathologic examination for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease is rarely done. Elderly patients presenting with progressive decline in memory and other cognitive impairments such as aphasia, agnosia or apraxia should be suspected for Alzheimer’s disease. In these patients, mental status examination (MSE) and neuropsychological testing should be performed to further evaluate the status of cognitive abilities. Laboratory investigation are not required to diagnose Alzheimer’s and are done to exclude other conditions which may present with similar symptoms as seen in Alzheimer’s disease (such as vit B12 deficiency, syphilis, or tuberculosis). Patients with atypical clinical presentation may also be tested for biomarkers such as and total and phosphorylated tau protein.

History and Symptoms

Obtaining patient’s history is an important aspect of making a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease patients may be disoriented and therefore the patient interview may be difficult. In such cases history from the care givers or the family members may need to be obtained. Specific histories about the symptoms (duration, onset, progression), associated symptoms, drug usage have to be obtained.

Physical Examination

Patients with Alzheimer’s disease usually appear disoriented and disorganized. When a doctor or physician has been notified, and AD is suspected, the diagnosis is usually further supported by behavioral assessments and cognitive tests, often followed by a brain scan if available. Physical examination of Alzheimer’s disease consists of a thorough neurological assessment of the patient. Patient may be disoriented to time, place and person. Diagnostic tools for the examination of the patient include mini- mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MOCA) and instruments of activities of dailing living (IADL).

Laboratory Findings

There are no specific diagnostic laboratory findings associated with Alzheimer’s disease. However, laboratory findings are done to rule out other conditions which may mimic Alzheimer’s disease symptoms. These include CSF analysisfor 2 and tau protein, 14-3-3 protein, vitamin B12 levels, thyroid hormones, electrolytes, HIV serology, complete blood count, blood glucose, renal function test, liver function test, and urine screen for drug abuse.

Electrocardiogram

ECG has minimal diagnostic value in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease but plays a role in diagnosing concurrent conduction abnormalities and monitoring side effects of medications. Electrocardiogram of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease may show QT dispersion and heart rate variability abnormalities.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with Alzheimer’s disease.

Ultrasound

Focused ultrasound is a non-invasive, therapeutic technology aiming to improve the quality of life at lower costs for patients with Alzheimer’s disease.

CT scan

CT scan of the brain may be helpful in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Findings include enlargement of cerebral sulci, loss of gyral volume and mild dilation of the ventricular system.

MRI

Structural MRI of the brain may be helpful in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Characteristic finding on MRI suggestive of Alzheimer’s disease include reduced hippocampal volume and medial temporal lobe atrophy.

Other Imaging Findings

Other imaging studies in Alzheimer’s include positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan. PET and SPECT scan are not routinely done in Alzheimer’s disease. However, patients with atypical presentation may be evaluated with either a PET or SPECT scan to assess for any underlying condition. In these patients, use of amyloid β PET scan will reveal lower FDG (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose) metabolism and higher PiB ([11 C]Pittsburgh compound B) deposition in areas of the brain affected by Alzheimer’s disease. On SPECT scan patients with Alzheimer’s disease have low relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the parietal and prefrontal cortices.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Genotyping for Apolipoprotein (APOE) ε-4, APOE ε-3, amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin PSEN1 and PSEN 2 genes may be helpful in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), although it is not routinely recommended. They may be helpful in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia. However, genetic study is reserved for research purposes or for those who have presenile dementia.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

There is no known cure for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Available treatments offer relatively small symptomatic benefit but remain palliative in nature. Current treatments can be divided into pharmacologicalpsychosocial, and caregiving. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors increase the amount of acetylcholine in the brain and are a major part of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Major drugs include, donepezilrivastigmine and galantamine, these drugs help with the cognitive symptoms of the disease. Associated psychosis and depression may be managed with antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Caregiving plays a pivotal role in the management of patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

Surgery

Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of Alzheimer’s disease.

Primary Prevention

Primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease includes mental stimulation, exercise, and the maintenance of a balanced diet are often recommended as both a possible prevention and a sensible way of managing the disease.

Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease is similar to primary prevention.

References

Template:WS Template:WH

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

The first case of Alzheimer’s disease was described by a German psychiatrist named Alöis Alzheimer in the year 1901. For many decades after Alzheimer’s original description, there was little progress in defining the pathogenesis of AD occurred. In the mid 1970’s, it was found that the levels of acetylcholine decrease in brains of individuals undergoing neurodegeneration due to Alzheimer’s disease. In early 1980’s major advances in biochemistry and molecular genetics allowed the use of compositional analyses and immunocytochemistry to explain the structure of tangles and plaques found in the brains of Alzheimer patients. The term Alzheimer’s disease was subsequently formally adopted in medical nomenclature to describe individuals of all ages with a characteristic common symptom pattern, disease course, and neuropathology.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1901 when Alöis Alzheimer, a German psychiatrist, identified the first case of what became known as Alzheimer’s disease in a fifty-year-old woman whom he referred to as Auguste D.
  • Alöis Alzheimer followed her until she died in 1906, at which point he reported the case publicly for the first time[1]
  • In the following five years, eleven similar cases were reported in the medical literature, some of them already using the term Alzheimer’s disease.[2]
  • In 1910, Emil Kraepelin recognized Alzheimer’s dementia as a separate entity in the eighth edition of his ‘Textbook of Psychiatry’, which was later published[3]
  • In the 1960’s, Alzheimer’s disease became one of the most common causes of senile dementia
  • For many decades after Alzheimer’s original description, there was little progress in defining the pathogenesis of AD occurred. The diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease was reserved for individuals between the ages of 45 and 65 who developed symptoms of dementia
  • In late 1960s, with the advent of electron microscopy, Michael Kidd in England and Robert Terry in the United States deciphered the microscopic changes underlying senile (neuritic) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles
  • In the mid 1970’s, it was found that the levels of acetylcholine decrease in brains of individuals undergoing neurodegeneration due to Alzheimer’s disease. As a result, pharmacological therapy became more focused on increasing the levels of acetylcholine across the synaptic clefts of Alzheimer patients
  • In the late 1970’s and early 1980s, it was identified that the levels of neurotransmitters other than acetylcholine were also changed in affected patients
  • In early 1980’s major advances in biochemistry and molecular genetics allowed the use of compositional analyses and immunocytochemistry to explain the structure of tangles and plaques. This eventually led to the use of Alzheimer’s disease independently of the age of onset of the disease[4][5]
  • The term Alzheimer’s disease was subsequently formally adopted in medical nomenclature to describe individuals of all ages with a characteristic common symptom pattern, disease course, and neuropathology[6]

References

  1. Auguste D.:
    • Alzheimer Alöis (1907). “Uber eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde” (in Template:De icon). 64 (1–2): 146–148.
    • Alöis Alzheimer. “About a peculiar disease of the cerebral cortex. (Translated by L. Jarvik and H. Greenson)”. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders. 1 (1): 3–8. PMID 3331112.
    • Maurer Ulrike, Maurer Konrad (2003). Alzheimer: the life of a physician and the career of a disease. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 270. ISBN 0-231-11896-1.
    • Hochberg Fred H., Rottenberg David (1977). Neurological classics in modern translation. New York: Hafner Press. ISBN 0-02-851180-8.
  2. Berchtold NC, Cotman CW (1998). “Evolution in the conceptualization of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Greco-Roman period to the 1960s”. Neurobiology of Aging. 19 (3): 173–189. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00052-9. PMID 9661992.
  3. Kraepelin Emil, Diefendorf A. Ross (translated by) (2007-01-17). Clinical Psychiatry: A Textbook For Students And Physicians (Reprint). Kessinger Publishing. p. 568. ISBN 1-4325-0833-4.
  4. Boller F, Forbes MM (1998). “History of dementia and dementia in history: an overview”. Journal of Neurological Science. 158 (2): 125–133. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00128-2. PMID 9702682.
  5. Katzman Robert, Terry Robert D, Bick Katherine L (editors) (1978). Alzheimer’s disease: senile dementia and related disorders. New York: Raven Press. p. 595. ISBN 0-89004-225-X.
  6. Amaducci LA, Rocca WA, Schoenberg BS (1986). “Origin of the distinction between Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: how history can clarify nosology”. Neurology. 36 (11): 1497–1499. PMID 3531918.

Template:WS Template:WH

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2], Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3], Haleigh Williams, B.S.

Overview

Alzheimer’s disease may be classified according to severity into mild, moderate and severe dementia. It may also be classified based on age of onset into early onset and late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Another method of classification of Alzheimer’s disease is based on the course of disease into pre-dementia, early dementia, moderate dementia and advanced dementia.

Classification

Classification based on severity

Alzheimer’s disease may be classified based on the clinical dementia rating criteria into minimal, intermediate, mild, moderate and severe:[1][2][3][4][5]

Clinical Dementia Rating
Based on the severity of Impairment
Criteria Minimal Indeterminate Mild Moderate Severe
Memory No memory loss or slight forgetfulness Minimal forgetfulness; partial recollection of events; “benign” forgetfulness Moderate memory loss; more marked for recent events; defect interferes with everyday activities Severe memory loss; only highly learned material retained; new material rapidly lost Severe memory loss; only fragments remain
Orientation Fully oriented Fully oriented except for slight difficulty with time perception Moderate difficulty with time perception; oriented for place at examination; may be disoriented to place Severe difficulty with time relationships; usually disoriented to time, often to place Oriented to person only
Judgment and problem solving Able to handle daily life activities (including financial issues); judgment good in relation to past performance Mild impairment in solving problems, determining similarities and differences Moderate difficulty in solving problems, difficulty in distinguishing things; social judgment usually maintained Severely impaired in solving problems, determining similarities and differences; social judgment usually impaired Unable to make judgments or solve problems
Social functioning Functions independently and performs daily tasks such as shopping, and volunteer and social groups Slight impairment in performing social activities Unable to perform social activities, although may still be engaged in some; appears normal on casual observation No pretense of independent function outside of home; appears well enough to be taken to functions outside a family home No pretense of independent function outside of home; appears too ill to be taken to functions outside a family home
Home and hobbies Able to carry out daily life activities, hobbies, and intellectual interests well maintained Daily life tasks, hobbies, and intellect slightly impaired Mild but definite impairment of function in performing daily life tasks; more difficult chores abandoned; more complicated hobbies and interests abandoned Only simple chores preserved; interests very restricted and poorly maintained No significant function in home
Personal care Able to take care of self Fully functional Needs reminders Requires assistance in dressing, hygiene, keeping of personal effects Requires much help with personal care; frequent incontinence

Classification based on age of onset

Alzheimer’s disease may be classified into early onset and late onset based on age of onset:[6][7][8][9][10]

Sub-class Genetics Prevalence
Late-onset familial (>60 years, AD2) 15%-25% of familial cases
Early-onset familial AD (<60 years, AD1, AD3, AD4) <2% of familial cases

Classification based on course of disease

Alzheimer’s disease may be classified into the following stages based on course of disease:[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][19][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]

Stage of Alzheime’s disease Major deficits
Predementia
Early dementia
Moderate dementia
Advanced dementia
  • Language is reduced to simple phrases or even single words, eventually leading to complete loss of speech
  • Extreme apathy
  • Exhaustion
  • Completely dependent on caregivers for daily tasks
  • Decreased muscle mass, eventually becomes bedridden

References

  1. Morris JC (1997). “Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type”. Int Psychogeriatr. 9 Suppl 1: 173–6, discussion 177–8. PMID 9447441.
  2. Berg L (1988). “Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)”. Psychopharmacol Bull. 24 (4): 637–9. PMID 3249765.
  3. O’Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, Lupo PJ, Reisch JS, Doody R (2008). “Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores: a Texas Alzheimer’s research consortium study”. Arch. Neurol. 65 (8): 1091–5. doi:10.1001/archneur.65.8.1091. PMC 3409562. PMID 18695059.
  4. Morris JC (1993). “The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules”. Neurology. 43 (11): 2412–4. PMID 8232972.
  5. Morris JC, Ernesto C, Schafer K, Coats M, Leon S, Sano M, Thal LJ, Woodbury P (1997). “Clinical dementia rating training and reliability in multicenter studies: the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study experience”. Neurology. 48 (6): 1508–10. PMID 9191756.
  6. “Alzheimer Disease Overview – GeneReviews® – NCBI Bookshelf”.
  7. Brickell KL, Steinbart EJ, Rumbaugh M, Payami H, Schellenberg GD, Van Deerlin V, Yuan W, Bird TD (2006). “Early-onset Alzheimer disease in families with late-onset Alzheimer disease: a potential important subtype of familial Alzheimer disease”. Arch. Neurol. 63 (9): 1307–11. doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.1307. PMID 16966510.
  8. Campion D, Dumanchin C, Hannequin D, Dubois B, Belliard S, Puel M, Thomas-Anterion C, Michon A, Martin C, Charbonnier F, Raux G, Camuzat A, Penet C, Mesnage V, Martinez M, Clerget-Darpoux F, Brice A, Frebourg T (1999). “Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: prevalence, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation spectrum”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65 (3): 664–70. doi:10.1086/302553. PMC 1377972. PMID 10441572.
  9. Munoz DG, Feldman H (2000). “Causes of Alzheimer’s disease”. CMAJ. 162 (1): 65–72. PMC 1232234. PMID 11216203.
  10. Hölscher C (1998). “Possible causes of Alzheimer’s disease: amyloid fragments, free radicals, and calcium homeostasis”. Neurobiol. Dis. 5 (3): 129–41. doi:10.1006/nbdi.1998.0193. PMID 9848086.
  11. Volicer L, Harper DG, Manning BC, Goldstein R, Satlin A. “Sundowning and circadian rhythms in Alzheimer’s disease”. Am J Psychiatry. 158 (5): 704–11. PMID 11329390. Retrieved 2008-08-27.
  12. Arnáiz E, Almkvist O (2003). “Neuropsychological features of mild cognitive impairment and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease”. Acta Neurol. Scand., Suppl. 179: 34–41. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.107.s179.7.x. PMID 12603249. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  13. Kazui H, Matsuda A, Hirono N; et al. (2005). “Everyday memory impairment of patients with mild cognitive impairment”. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 19 (5–6): 331–7. doi:10.1159/000084559. PMID 15785034. Retrieved 2008-06-12.
  14. Rapp MA, Reischies FM (2005). “Attention and executive control predict Alzheimer disease in late life: results from the Berlin Aging Study (BASE)”. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 13 (2): 134–141. doi:10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.2.134. PMID 15703322.
  15. Spaan PE, Raaijmakers JG, Jonker C (2003). “Alzheimer’s disease versus normal ageing: a review of the efficiency of clinical and experimental memory measures”. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology. 25 (2): 216–233. PMID 12754679.
  16. Craig D, Mirakhur A, Hart DJ, McIlroy SP, Passmore AP (2005). “A cross-sectional study of neuropsychiatric symptoms in 435 patients with Alzheimer’s disease”. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 13 (6): 460–468. doi:10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.6.460. PMID 15956265.
  17. Robert PH, Berr C, Volteau M, Bertogliati C, Benoit M, Sarazin M, Legrain S, Dubois B (2006). “Apathy in patients with mild cognitive impairment and the risk of developing dementia of Alzheimer’s disease: a one-year follow-up study”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 108 (8): 733–736. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.02.003. PMID 16567037.
  18. Palmer K, Berger AK, Monastero R, Winblad B, Bäckman L, Fratiglioni L (2007). “Predictors of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease”. Neurology. 68 (19): 1596–1602. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000260968.92345.3f. PMID 17485646.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Förstl H, Kurz A (1999). “Clinical features of Alzheimer’s disease”. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 249 (6): 288–290. PMID 10653284.
  20. Small BJ, Gagnon E, Robinson B. “Early identification of cognitive deficits: preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment”. Geriatrics. 62 (4): 19–23. PMID 17408315.
  21. Petersen RC. “The current status of mild cognitive impairment—what do we tell our patients?”. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 3 (2): 60–1. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0402. PMID 17279076.
  22. Frank EM. “Effect of Alzheimer’s disease on communication function”. J S C Med Assoc. 90 (9): 417–23. PMID 7967534.
  23. Jelicic M, Bonebakker AE, Bonke B (1995). “Implicit memory performance of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a brief review”. International Psychogeriatrics. 7 (3): 385–392. doi:10.1017/S1041610295002134. PMID 8821346.
  24. Becker JT, Overman AA (2002). “[The semantic memory deficit in Alzheimer’s disease]”. Rev Neurol (in Spanish; Castilian). 35 (8): 777–83. PMID 12402233.
  25. Hodges JR, Patterson K. “Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications”. Neuropsychologia. 33 (4): 441–59. PMID 7617154.
  26. Benke T. “Two forms of apraxia in Alzheimer’s disease”. Cortex. 29 (4): 715–25. PMID 8124945.
  27. Forbes KE, Shanks MF, Venneri A. “The evolution of dysgraphia in Alzheimer’s disease”. Brain Res. Bull. 63 (1): 19–24. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.11.005. PMID 15121235.
  28. Galasko D, Schmitt F, Thomas R, Jin S, Bennett D (2005). “Detailed assessment of activities of daily living in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease”. Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society. 11 (4): 446–453. PMID 16209425.
  29. Neuropsychiatric symptoms:
    • Scarmeas N, Brandt J, Blacker D; et al. “Disruptive behavior as a predictor in Alzheimer disease”. Arch. Neurol. 64 (12): 1755–61. doi:10.1001/archneur.64.12.1755. PMID 18071039.
    • Tatsch MF, Bottino CM, Azevedo D; et al. “Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer disease and cognitively impaired, nondemented elderly from a community-based sample in Brazil: prevalence and relationship with dementia severity”. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 14 (5): 438–45. doi:10.1097/01.JGP.0000218218.47279.db. PMID 16670248.
    • Volicer L, Bass EA, Luther SL. “Agitation and resistiveness to care are two separate behavioral syndromes of dementia”. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 8 (8): 527–32. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2007.05.005. PMID 17931577.
  30. Honig LS, Mayeux R. “Natural history of Alzheimer’s disease”. Aging (Milano). 13 (3): 171–82. PMID 11442300.
  31. Gold DP, Reis MF, Markiewicz D, Andres D. “When home caregiving ends: a longitudinal study of outcomes for caregivers of relatives with dementia”. J Am Geriatr Soc. 43 (1): 10–6. PMID 7806732.
  32. Souren LE, Franssen EH, Reisberg B. “Contractures and loss of function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease”. J Am Geriatr Soc. 43 (6): 650–5. PMID 7775724.
  33. Wada H, Nakajoh K, Satoh-Nakagawa T; et al. “Risk factors of aspiration pneumonia in Alzheimer’s disease patients”. Gerontology. 47 (5): 271–6. PMID 11490146.
  34. Berkhout AM, Cools HJ, van Houwelingen HC. “The relationship between difficulties in feeding oneself and loss of weight in nursing-home patients with dementia”. Age Ageing. 27 (5): 637–41. PMID 12675103.
  35. Gambassi G, Landi F, Lapane KL, Sgadari A, Mor V, Bernabei R. “Predictors of mortality in patients with Alzheimer’s disease living in nursing homes”. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 67 (1): 59–65. PMC 1736445. PMID 10369823.

Template:WS Template:WH

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2], Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Alzheimer disease (AD), is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The dysfunction of amyloid precursor protien (APP) metabolism and the resulting build up of of Aβ peptides and their aggregation in the form of senile plaques in the brain parenchyma of individuals have been considered pivotal for neurodegeneration in the disease. Cognitive impairment in patients with AD is closely associated with synaptic loss in the neocortex and limbic system. In familial forms of AD, mutations result in an increased Aβ production or aggregation, in sporadic AD, failure of the clearance mechanisms might play a key role. Loss of mature neurons and alterations in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in areas such as the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus have been found to be responsible for manifestations of AD. On gross pathology, temporal atrophy (hippocampus in particular), dilation of lateral ventricles and third ventricle are characteristic findings of Alzheimer’s disease. The microscopic histopathological features of alzheimer’s disease consist neurofibrillary tangles, senile plaques, neuronal loss, and with or without cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

Pathophysiology

Alzheimer disease (AD), is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The dysfunction of amyloid precursor protien (APP) metabolism and the resulting build up of of Aβ peptides and their aggregation in the form of senile plaques in the brain parenchyma of individuals have been considered pivotal for neurodegeneration in the disease. There is also an accumulation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles that consist of hyperphosphorylated tau protein and a profound loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons that innervate the hippocampus, and the neocortex.

Triggers

The following factors lead to the development of Alzheimer’s dementia:

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) can be explained by four pathological processes. The processes involved in the development of AD and their molecular basis is as follows:[1][2]

(i) Neuronal loss

(ii) Aggregation of extra-cellular amyloid β (Aβ)

Constitutive (nonamyloidogenic) pathway

  • In the constitutive pathway, proteolysis of APP by α- and γ-secretases results in nonpathogenic fragments (sAPPα and α-C-terminal fragment)

Amyloidogenic pathway

(iii) CDK5 pathway

(iv) Formation of intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles (tau protein accumulation)

Genetics

Genetic origin of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) demonstrates an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Alzheimer’s dementia arising from genetic alterations may lead to early onset (<60 years) of disease. The following mutations are implicated in the development of AD are:[20]

Common genes

Early onset (Alzheimer’s dementia-AD 1, 3 and 4)

30-50 percent of early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) is associated with an autosomal dominant inheritance and consists of mutations in the following genes:[21][22]

Late onset (Alzheimer’s dementia -AD2)

Less common genes

Less common genes associated with the development of AD are:


Associated Conditions

Gross Pathology

Comparison of alzheimer’s disease brain, By derivative work: Garrondo,”Alzheimer’s Disease Education and Referral Center, a service of the National Institute on Aging.”, via Wikimedia Commons

Microscopic Pathology

Neurofibrillary tangles in the Hippocampus of an old person with Alzheimer’s, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Biopsy specimen displaying a neuritic plaque in a case of Alzheimers Disease, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Neurofibrillary tangles in the Hippocampus of elderly with Alzheimer, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

References

  1. Crews L, Masliah E (2010). “Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease”. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19 (R1): R12–20. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq160. PMC 2875049. PMID 20413653.
  2. Weller J, Budson A (2018). “Current understanding of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and treatment”. F1000Res. 7. doi:10.12688/f1000research.14506.1. PMC 6073093. PMID 30135715.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Beach TG, Walker R, McGeer EG (1989). “Patterns of gliosis in Alzheimer’s disease and aging cerebrum”. Glia. 2 (6): 420–36. doi:10.1002/glia.440020605. PMID 2531723.
  4. DeKosky ST, Scheff SW (1990). “Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity”. Ann. Neurol. 27 (5): 457–64. doi:10.1002/ana.410270502. PMID 2360787.
  5. Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R (1991). “Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment”. Ann. Neurol. 30 (4): 572–80. doi:10.1002/ana.410300410. PMID 1789684.
  6. Boekhoorn K, Joels M, Lucassen PJ (2006). “Increased proliferation reflects glial and vascular-associated changes, but not neurogenesis in the presenile Alzheimer hippocampus”. Neurobiol. Dis. 24 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2006.04.017. PMID 16814555.
  7. Selkoe DJ (1989). “Amyloid beta protein precursor and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease”. Cell. 58 (4): 611–2. PMID 2504495.
  8. Tanzi RE, Gusella JF, Watkins PC, Bruns GA, St George-Hyslop P, Van Keuren ML, Patterson D, Pagan S, Kurnit DM, Neve RL (1987). “Amyloid beta protein gene: cDNA, mRNA distribution, and genetic linkage near the Alzheimer locus”. Science. 235 (4791): 880–4. PMID 2949367.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ (2004). “Oligomers on the brain: the emerging role of soluble protein aggregates in neurodegeneration”. Protein Pept. Lett. 11 (3): 213–28. PMID 15182223.
  10. Van Cauwenberghe C, Van Broeckhoven C, Sleegers K (2016). “The genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease: clinical implications and perspectives”. Genet. Med. 18 (5): 421–30. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.117. PMC 4857183. PMID 26312828.
  11. Bendiske J, Bahr BA (2003). “Lysosomal activation is a compensatory response against protein accumulation and associated synaptopathogenesis–an approach for slowing Alzheimer disease?”. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 62 (5): 451–63. PMID 12769185.
  12. Volles MJ, Lansbury PT (2002). “Vesicle permeabilization by protofibrillar alpha-synuclein is sensitive to Parkinson’s disease-linked mutations and occurs by a pore-like mechanism”. Biochemistry. 41 (14): 4595–602. PMID 11926821.
  13. Selkoe DJ (1999). “Translating cell biology into therapeutic advances in Alzheimer’s disease”. Nature. 399 (6738 Suppl): A23–31. PMID 10392577.
  14. Lin H, Bhatia R, Lal R (2001). “Amyloid beta protein forms ion channels: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology”. FASEB J. 15 (13): 2433–44. doi:10.1096/fj.01-0377com. PMID 11689468.
  15. Nakamura T, Lipton SA (2010). “Redox regulation of mitochondrial fission, protein misfolding, synaptic damage, and neuronal cell death: potential implications for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases”. Apoptosis. 15 (11): 1354–63. doi:10.1007/s10495-010-0476-x. PMC 2978885. PMID 20177970.
  16. Nixon RA, Cataldo AM (2006). “Lysosomal system pathways: genes to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease”. J. Alzheimers Dis. 9 (3 Suppl): 277–89. PMID 16914867.
  17. Matsubara M, Kusubata M, Ishiguro K, Uchida T, Titani K, Taniguchi H (1996). “Site-specific phosphorylation of synapsin I by mitogen-activated protein kinase and Cdk5 and its effects on physiological functions”. J. Biol. Chem. 271 (35): 21108–13. PMID 8702879.
  18. Ittner LM, Ke YD, Delerue F, Bi M, Gladbach A, van Eersel J, Wölfing H, Chieng BC, Christie MJ, Napier IA, Eckert A, Staufenbiel M, Hardeman E, Götz J (2010). “Dendritic function of tau mediates amyloid-beta toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models”. Cell. 142 (3): 387–97. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.036. PMID 20655099.
  19. Delacourte A, Flament S, Dibe EM, Hublau P, Sablonnière B, Hémon B, Shérrer V, Défossez A (1990). “Pathological proteins Tau 64 and 69 are specifically expressed in the somatodendritic domain of the degenerating cortical neurons during Alzheimer’s disease. Demonstration with a panel of antibodies against Tau proteins”. Acta Neuropathol. 80 (2): 111–7. PMID 2117840.
  20. “Alzheimer Disease Overview – GeneReviews® – NCBI Bookshelf”.
  21. Campion D, Dumanchin C, Hannequin D, Dubois B, Belliard S, Puel M, Thomas-Anterion C, Michon A, Martin C, Charbonnier F, Raux G, Camuzat A, Penet C, Mesnage V, Martinez M, Clerget-Darpoux F, Brice A, Frebourg T (1999). “Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: prevalence, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation spectrum”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65 (3): 664–70. doi:10.1086/302553. PMC 1377972. PMID 10441572.
  22. Tsuang D, Larson EB, Bowen J, McCormick W, Teri L, Nochlin D, Leverenz JB, Peskind ER, Lim A, Raskind MA, Thompson ML, Mirra SS, Gearing M, Schellenberg GD, Kukull W (1999). “The utility of apolipoprotein E genotyping in the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease in a community-based case series”. Arch. Neurol. 56 (12): 1489–95. PMID 10593304.
  23. Khachaturian AS, Corcoran CD, Mayer LS, Zandi PP, Breitner JC (2004). “Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 count affects age at onset of Alzheimer disease, but not lifetime susceptibility: The Cache County Study”. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 61 (5): 518–24. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.518. PMID 15123497.
  24. Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, Bjornsson S, Huttenlocher J, Levey AI, Lah JJ, Rujescu D, Hampel H, Giegling I, Andreassen OA, Engedal K, Ulstein I, Djurovic S, Ibrahim-Verbaas C, Hofman A, Ikram MA, van Duijn CM, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K (2013). “Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 368 (2): 107–16. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211103. PMC 3677583. PMID 23150908.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

Alzheimer’s disease may be caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, familial inheritance of mutations in either presenilin 1 gene, presenilin 2 gene or APOE4 gene. Presenilin mutations are associated with early onset Alzheimer’s disease, whereas APOE mutations are associated with late onset disease. Environmental factors, such as aging, low level of education and head trauma may also contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Causes

The following are the causes of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD):[1][2][3][4][5]

Cause Specific characteristics Percentage of cases
Chromosomal (Down syndrome) <1%
All familial ~25%
  • Late-onset familial (AD2)
15%-25% of familial cases
  • Early-onset familial AD (AD1, AD3, AD4)
<2% of familial cases
Unknown (includes genetic/environment interactions) ~75%

References

  1. “Alzheimer Disease Overview – GeneReviews® – NCBI Bookshelf”.
  2. Brickell KL, Steinbart EJ, Rumbaugh M, Payami H, Schellenberg GD, Van Deerlin V, Yuan W, Bird TD (2006). “Early-onset Alzheimer disease in families with late-onset Alzheimer disease: a potential important subtype of familial Alzheimer disease”. Arch. Neurol. 63 (9): 1307–11. doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.1307. PMID 16966510.
  3. Campion D, Dumanchin C, Hannequin D, Dubois B, Belliard S, Puel M, Thomas-Anterion C, Michon A, Martin C, Charbonnier F, Raux G, Camuzat A, Penet C, Mesnage V, Martinez M, Clerget-Darpoux F, Brice A, Frebourg T (1999). “Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: prevalence, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation spectrum”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65 (3): 664–70. doi:10.1086/302553. PMC 1377972. PMID 10441572.
  4. Munoz DG, Feldman H (2000). “Causes of Alzheimer’s disease”. CMAJ. 162 (1): 65–72. PMC 1232234. PMID 11216203.
  5. Hölscher C (1998). “Possible causes of Alzheimer’s disease: amyloid fragments, free radicals, and calcium homeostasis”. Neurobiol. Dis. 5 (3): 129–41. doi:10.1006/nbdi.1998.0193. PMID 9848086.

Template:WS Template:WH

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

Alzheimer’s disease is the most frequently observed form of dementia, and it typically develops in elderly patients. An estimated 5.5 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s disease. An estimated 10,000 per 100,000 individuals aged greater than 65 years have been known to be living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Alzheimer’s disease has been known to affect females more than males. African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease than older whites. AD is diagnosed in people over 65 years of age, although the less prevalent early-onset Alzheimer’s can occur much earlier.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia observed in the elderly; it affects almost half of all patients with dementia. Correspondingly, advancing age is the primary risk factor for the development of AD.[1][2]

Prevalence

  • An estimated 47 million people worldwide have Alzheimer’s disease according to the World Health Organization (WHO).[3]
  • An estimated 5.5 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s disease[4]
  • An estimated 10,000 per 100,000 individuals aged greater than 65 years have been known to be living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States[4]

Trends in United states

  • The following table outlines the general prevalence trends according to age in the United States:[5][6][7]
Age (years) All dementia per 100,000 individuals Alzheimer’s disease (AD) per 100,000 individuals
Combined Men Women Combined Men Women
71–79 4970 525 4760 2320 2300 2330
80–89 24190 17680 27840 18100 12330 21340
90+ 3720 44590 34690 2960 33890 28150
Total 13670 10800 15530 9510 6770 11290

Developing countries

  • Prevalence rates in developing regions are lower[8]
  • Low prevalence of dementia has been reported in India and sub-Saharan Africa

Trends in developing countries

Asia Year Diagnostic criteria Age Prevalence (All dementia)

per 100,000 individuals

Prevalence of Alzheimer’s dementia per 100,000 individuals Causes of other dementia
China 2007 DSM-III, ICD-10 >65 3100 2000 Mixed, PDD, DLB,FTD
China (Beijing, Xian, Shanghai, Chengdu) 2005 DSM-IV >65 5000 3500 Mixed, PDD, DLB
Taiwan 1995-1998 DSM-IIIR, DSM-IV >65 3200 1900 Mixed
South Korea 1994-2005 DSM-III, DSM-IV >65 10100 5200 Mixed
Thailand 2001 DSM-III >60 3400 -.
India 1996-2006 DSM-III, DSM-IV >65 2700 1300 Mixed, PDD, DLB, PSD
Sri Lanka 2003 DSM-IV >65 3980 2850 Mixed
Israel (Wadi Ara) 2002 DSM-IV >65 21100 20500 Mixed
Africa
Egypt 1998 DSM-IV >65 5930 2860 Mixed
Nigeria 1995 DSM-III, ICD-10 >65 2300 1400 Mixed, DLB
Latin America
Cuba 1999 DSM-IV >60 8.200 5100 Mixed, alcohol dementia
Argentina 1999 DSM-IV >65 11.500 Age
Brazil 2002-2008 DSM-IIIR, DSM-IV >65 5300 2700 Mixed, PDD
Chile 1997 DSM-IIIR >65 4300
Colombia 2000 DSM-IV >65 and >75 1800
Peru 2007 DSM-IV >65 6700
Venezuela 2002 DSM-IV >55 and >65 8000 4000 Mixed

Legend: PDD= Parkinson disease dementia, PSD= Post-stroke dementia, FTD= Fronto-temporal dementia, Mixed= Alzheimer’s plus vascular dementia

  • The following bar-chart displays the prevalence of Alzheimer’s dementia across different countries based on above data:
Prevalence of Alzheimer’s dementia across different geographic locations


Gender

  • Alzheimer’s disease has been known to affect females more than males
  • Out of the 5.5 million people age 65 and older with Alzheimer’s in the United States, 3.5 million are women and 2.0 million are men
  • The Framingham Heart Study suggests that because men in middle age have a higher mortality rate from cardiovascular disease than women in middle age, men who survive beyond age 65 may have a healthier cardiovascular risk profile and thus an apparent lower risk for dementia than women of the same age (survival bias)[22]
  • APOE-e4 genotype, has been known to have stronger association with Alzheimer’s dementia in women[23]

Race

  • African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease than older whites[24]
  • Dementia incidence is known to be highest in African-Americans, intermediate in Hispanics and lowest for Asian-Americans
  • The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias in the United States based on race has been found to be as follows:
    • 6900 per 100,000 of whites, 9400 per 100,000 of African-Americans and 11500 per 100,000 of Hispanics

Mortality rate

The following are the mortality rates for Alzheimer’s dementia between 2001 and 2014:[25]

Year Mortality rate per 100,000 individuals
2001 18.9
2002 20.5
2003 21.9
2004 22.5
2005 24.2
2006 24.3
2007 24.8
2008 27.1
2009 25.8
2010 27.0
2011 27.3
2012 26.6
2013 26.8
2014 29.3
  • The following scatter-plot shows the above mentioned data:
Mortality rates of Alzheimer’s dementia between 2001 and 2014 (per100,000 individuals)


Age

  • Generally, AD is diagnosed in people over 65 years of age,[26] although the less prevalent early-onset Alzheimer’s can occur much earlier
  • The number of people with Alzheimer’s dementia increases with age:
    • 3000 per 100,000 individuals age 65-74
    • 17000 per 100,000 individuals age 75-84
    • 32000 per 100,000 individuals age 85 and older
AD incidence rates
after 65 years of age[27]
Age Incidence
(new affected)
per thousand
person–years
65–69  3
70–74  6
75–79  9
80–84 23
85–89 40
90–   69


References

  1. Gorelick P (2004). “Risk factors for vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease”. Stroke. 35 (11 Suppl 1): 2620–2622. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000143318.70292.47. PMID 15375299.
  2. Hebert L, Scherr P, Bienias J, Bennett D, Evans D (2003). “Alzheimer disease in the U.S. population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census”. Archives of Neurology. 60 (8): 1119–1122. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119. PMID 12925369.
  3. “WHO | Dementia”.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA (2013). “Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census”. Neurology. 80 (19): 1778–83. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5. PMC 3719424. PMID 23390181.
  5. Evans DA (1990). “Estimated prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States”. Milbank Q. 68 (2): 267–89. PMID 2233632.
  6. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA (2003). “Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census”. Arch. Neurol. 60 (8): 1119–22. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119. PMID 12925369.
  7. Langa KM, Plassman BL, Wallace RB, Herzog AR, Heeringa SG, Ofstedal MB, Burke JR, Fisher GG, Fultz NH, Hurd MD, Potter GG, Rodgers WL, Steffens DC, Weir DR, Willis RJ (2005). “The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study: study design and methods”. Neuroepidemiology. 25 (4): 181–91. doi:10.1159/000087448. PMID 16103729.
  8. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C; et al. “Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study” (PDF). Lancet. 366 (9503): 2112–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0. PMID 16360788. Retrieved 2008-06-13.
  9. Dong MJ, Peng B, Lin XT, Zhao J, Zhou YR, Wang RH (2007). “The prevalence of dementia in the People’s Republic of China: a systematic analysis of 1980-2004 studies”. Age Ageing. 36 (6): 619–24. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm128. PMID 17965036.
  10. Zhang ZX, Zahner GE, Román GC, Liu J, Hong Z, Qu QM, Liu XH, Zhang XJ, Zhou B, Wu CB, Tang MN, Hong X, Li H (2005). “Dementia subtypes in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, Shanghai, and Chengdu”. Arch. Neurol. 62 (3): 447–53. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.3.447. PMID 15767510.
  11. Lin RT, Lai CL, Tai CT, Liu CK, Yen YY, Howng SL (1998). “Prevalence and subtypes of dementia in southern Taiwan: impact of age, sex, education, and urbanization”. J. Neurol. Sci. 160 (1): 67–75. PMID 9804120.
  12. Liu HC, Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Liu CY, Lin KP, Lin CH, Wang PN, Lin KN, Wang HC, Chen HM, Chang R, Larson EB, Wu GS, Chou P, Teng EL (1997). “The Kinmen Neurological Disorders Survey (KINDS): a study of a Chinese population”. Neuroepidemiology. 16 (2): 60–8. PMID 9057167.
  13. Suh GH, Kim JK, Cho MJ (2003). “Community study of dementia in the older Korean rural population”. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 37 (5): 606–12. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01237.x. PMID 14511090.
  14. Vas CJ, Pinto C, Panikker D, Noronha S, Deshpande N, Kulkarni L, Sachdeva S (2001). “Prevalence of dementia in an urban Indian population”. Int Psychogeriatr. 13 (4): 439–50. PMID 12003250.
  15. de Silva HA, Gunatilake SB, Smith AD (2003). “Prevalence of dementia in a semi-urban population in Sri Lanka: report from a regional survey”. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 18 (8): 711–5. doi:10.1002/gps.909. PMID 12891639.
  16. Bowirrat A, Friedland RP, Korczyn AD (2002). “Vascular dementia among elderly Arabs in Wadi Ara”. J. Neurol. Sci. 203-204: 73–6. PMID 12417360.
  17. Llibre JJ, Guerra MA, Pérez-Cruz H, Bayarre H, Fernández-Ramírez S, González-Rodríguez M, Samper JA (1999). “[Dementia syndrome and risk factors in adults older than 60 years old residing in Habana]”. Rev Neurol (in Spanish; Castilian). 29 (10): 908–11. PMID 10637837.
  18. Herrera E, Caramelli P, Silveira AS, Nitrini R (2002). “Epidemiologic survey of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population”. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 16 (2): 103–8. PMID 12040305.
  19. Quiroga P, Calvo C, Albala C, Urquidi J, Santos JL, Pérez H, Klaassen G (1999). “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in elderly Chilean people with Alzheimer’s disease”. Neuroepidemiology. 18 (1): 48–52. PMID 9831815.
  20. Rosselli D, Ardila A, Pradilla G, Morillo L, Bautista L, Rey O, Camacho M (2000). “[The Mini-Mental State Examination as a selected diagnostic test for dementia: a Colombian population study. GENECO]”. Rev Neurol (in Spanish; Castilian). 30 (5): 428–32. PMID 10775968.
  21. Pradilla G, Vesga BE, Leon-Sarmiento FE, Bautista LE, Núñez LC, Vesga E, Gamboa NR (2002). “[Neuroepidemiology in the eastern region of Colombia]”. Rev Neurol (in Spanish; Castilian). 34 (11): 1035–43. PMID 12134301.
  22. Chêne G, Beiser A, Au R, Preis SR, Wolf PA, Dufouil C, Seshadri S (2015). “Gender and incidence of dementia in the Framingham Heart Study from mid-adult life”. Alzheimers Dement. 11 (3): 310–320. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.10.005. PMC 4092061. PMID 24418058.
  23. Altmann A, Tian L, Henderson VW, Greicius MD (2014). “Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease”. Ann. Neurol. 75 (4): 563–73. doi:10.1002/ana.24135. PMC 4117990. PMID 24623176.
  24. Ungar L, Altmann A, Greicius MD (2014). “Apolipoprotein E, gender, and Alzheimer’s disease: an overlooked, but potent and promising interaction”. Brain Imaging Behav. 8 (2): 262–73. doi:10.1007/s11682-013-9272-x. PMC 4282773. PMID 24293121.
  25. “www.cdc.gov” (PDF).
  26. Brookmeyer R, Gray S, Kawas C. “Projections of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset”. Am J Public Health. 88 (9): 1337–42. PMC 1509089. PMID 9736873.
  27. Bermejo-Pareja F, Benito-León J, Vega S, Medrano MJ, Román GC. “Incidence and subtypes of dementia in three elderly populations of central Spain”. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 264 (1–2): 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.07.021. PMID 17727890. Retrieved 2012-08-15.

Template:WS Template:WH

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

The most potent risk factors for the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are age and genetic mutations. Females are more prone to development of Alzheimer’s disease. Inhabitants of Central African Republic, East Africa, Southern Africa, Malaysia, Australia, and Papua New Guinea are more predisposed to the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Stroke increases the risk of Alzheimer’s dementia.

Risk Factors

The following risk factors may lead to the development of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD):[1][2][3]

  • Increasing age
  • Genetic mutations
  • Gender (females > males)
  • Early-life negative events and physical attributes
  • Literacy and education (low literacy and education increases the chances of developing AD)
  • Geographical location (Central African Republic, East Africa, Southern Africa, Malaysia, Australia, and Papua New Guinea, APOE4 is a risk factor for AD among women but not men in Venezuela)
  • Stroke
  • Vascular disease
  • Diet (fruits, vegetables, and fibre decrease risk; Tofu, cycad fruit, salivary phytooestrogens e.g. genistein and daidizein are associated with increased risk)

Comparison of risk factors among developed and developing countries for Alzheimer’s dementia

The following table outlines the comparison of different risk factors among various geographic regions:[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][3][17][18]

Risk Factor Developed regions (North America, Europe, Japan) Asia (China, Guam, India, South Korea, Taiwan) Africa (Egypt, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa) Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela)
Increasing age + + + +
Female sex + + Not reported Not reported
Family history + + Not reported +
Head injury + Not reported Not reported +
Genes (APOE4 allele) + + No risk Not reported
Illiteracy or lack of education + + + +
Mild cognitive impairment or cognitive impairment without dementia + + Not reported +
Urban living Not reported Not reported +
Low socioeconomic status or poverty Not reported + Not reported +
Occupation as housewife + Not reported +
Depression + + Positive +
Vascular disease + + + Not reported
Low fibre diet Not reported + +
Smoking + + Not reported Not reported

Legend:

+ : Positive correlation

– : Negative correlation

References

  1. Kalaria RN, Maestre GE, Arizaga R, Friedland RP, Galasko D, Hall K, Luchsinger JA, Ogunniyi A, Perry EK, Potocnik F, Prince M, Stewart R, Wimo A, Zhang ZX, Antuono P (2008). “Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in developing countries: prevalence, management, and risk factors”. Lancet Neurol. 7 (9): 812–26. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70169-8. PMC 2860610. PMID 18667359.
  2. Dong MJ, Peng B, Lin XT, Zhao J, Zhou YR, Wang RH (2007). “The prevalence of dementia in the People’s Republic of China: a systematic analysis of 1980-2004 studies”. Age Ageing. 36 (6): 619–24. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm128. PMID 17965036.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Herrera E, Bahia VS, Caixeta LF, Radanovic M, Anghinah R, Charchat-Fichman H, Porto CS, Carthery MT, Hartmann AP, Huang N, Smid J, Lima EP, Takada LT, Takahashi DY (2004). “Incidence of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population”. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 18 (4): 241–6. PMID 15592138.
  4. Brayne C (2007). “The elephant in the room – healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health”. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 (3): 233–9. doi:10.1038/nrn2091. PMID 17299455.
  5. Hendrie HC, Murrell J, Gao S, Unverzagt FW, Ogunniyi A, Hall KS (2006). “International studies in dementia with particular emphasis on populations of African origin”. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 20 (3 Suppl 2): S42–6. PMC 3212027. PMID 16917194.
  6. Brayne C (1991). “The EURODEM collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies of Alzheimer’s disease: implications for public health”. Int J Epidemiol. 20 Suppl 2: S68–71. PMID 1917271.
  7. Chen CH, Mizuno T, Elston R, Kariuki MM, Hall K, Unverzagt F, Hendrie H, Gatere S, Kioy P, Patel NB, Friedland RP, Kalaria RN (2010). “A comparative study to screen dementia and APOE genotypes in an ageing East African population”. Neurobiol. Aging. 31 (5): 732–40. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.06.014. PMC 2857314. PMID 18703255.
  8. Zhang ZX, Zahner GE, Román GC, Liu J, Hong Z, Qu QM, Liu XH, Zhang XJ, Zhou B, Wu CB, Tang MN, Hong X, Li H (2005). “Dementia subtypes in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, Shanghai, and Chengdu”. Arch. Neurol. 62 (3): 447–53. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.3.447. PMID 15767510.
  9. Shin HY, Chung EK, Rhee JA, Yoon JS, Kim JM (2005). “[Prevalence and related factors of dementia in an urban elderly population using a new screening method]”. J Prev Med Public Health (in Korean). 38 (3): 351–8. PMID 16323637.
  10. Das SK, Biswas A, Roy T, Banerjee TK, Mukherjee CS, Raut DK, Chaudhuri A (2006). “A random sample survey for prevalence of major neurological disorders in Kolkata”. Indian J. Med. Res. 124 (2): 163–72. PMID 17015930.
  11. Scazufca M, Menezes PR, Vallada HP, Crepaldi AL, Pastor-Valero M, Coutinho LM, Di Rienzo VD, Almeida OP (2008). “High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socioeconomic backgrounds in São Paulo, Brazil”. Int Psychogeriatr. 20 (2): 394–405. doi:10.1017/S1041610207005625. PMID 17559708.
  12. Hendrie HC, Osuntokun BO, Hall KS, Ogunniyi AO, Hui SL, Unverzagt FW, Gureje O, Rodenberg CA, Baiyewu O, Musick BS (1995). “Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia in two communities: Nigerian Africans and African Americans”. Am J Psychiatry. 152 (10): 1485–92. doi:10.1176/ajp.152.10.1485. PMID 7573588.
  13. Llibre JJ, Guerra MA, Pérez-Cruz H, Bayarre H, Fernández-Ramírez S, González-Rodríguez M, Samper JA (1999). “[Dementia syndrome and risk factors in adults older than 60 years old residing in Habana]”. Rev Neurol (in Spanish; Castilian). 29 (10): 908–11. PMID 10637837.
  14. Quiroga P, Calvo C, Albala C, Urquidi J, Santos JL, Pérez H, Klaassen G (1999). “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in elderly Chilean people with Alzheimer’s disease”. Neuroepidemiology. 18 (1): 48–52. PMID 9831815.
  15. Ochayi B, Thacher TD (2006). “Risk factors for dementia in central Nigeria”. Aging Ment Health. 10 (6): 616–20. doi:10.1080/13607860600736182. PMID 17050090.
  16. Suhanov AV, Pilipenko PI, Korczyn AD, Hofman A, Voevoda MI, Shishkin SV, Simonova GI, Nikitin YP, Feigin VL (2006). “Risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease in Russia: a case-control study”. Eur. J. Neurol. 13 (9): 990–5. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01391.x. PMID 16930366.
  17. Romas SN, Santana V, Williamson J, Ciappa A, Lee JH, Rondon HZ, Estevez P, Lantigua R, Medrano M, Torres M, Stern Y, Tycko B, Mayeux R (2002). “Familial Alzheimer disease among Caribbean Hispanics: a reexamination of its association with APOE”. Arch. Neurol. 59 (1): 87–91. PMID 11790235.
  18. Baiyewu O, Smith-Gamble V, Lane KA, Gureje O, Gao S, Ogunniyi A, Unverzagt FW, Hall KS, Hendrie HC (2007). “Prevalence estimates of depression in elderly community-dwelling African Americans in Indianapolis and Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria”. Int Psychogeriatr. 19 (4): 679–89. doi:10.1017/S1041610207005480. PMC 2855127. PMID 17506912.

Template:WS Template:WH

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a slow-progressing condition that involves complications such as the inability to take care of oneself. If left untreated, Alzheimer’s disease progresses from pre-clinical stage to advanced dementia. Common complications of Alzheimer’s disease include anosmia, bedsores, psychosis, malnutrition and dehydration. There is no cure for Alzheimer’s disease currently and the treatment focuses on symptomatic management of the disease.

Natural History

If left untreated, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may progress through three stages:[1]

  • (i) Preclinical stage:
  • (II) Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) :
    • MCI denotes the period during which there is observable evidence of cognitive impairment, often also reported by an informant; however, the impairment is not enough to limit daily activities
  • (III) Alzheimer’s disease dementia:
    • The transition or prodromal stage between normal ageing and dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous entity.
    • Advanced dementia may display the following features:
      • Becoming unaware of the time and place
      • Difficulty recognizing relatives and friends
      • Increased need for assisted self-care
      • Difficulty walking
      • Behavioural changes that may escalate and include aggression

Complications

Potential complications of Alzheimer’s disease include:[2][3][4]

Prognosis

  • Individual prognosis is difficult to assess due to the variability of the duration of the disease. AD develops for an indeterminate period of time before becoming fully apparent, and it can progress undiagnosed for years
  • The early stages of Alzheimer’s disease are most difficult to diagnose. A definitive diagnosis is usually made once cognitive impairment compromises everyday activities, although the patient may still be living independently
  • People with Alzheimer’s disease progress from mild cognitive problems, such as memory loss, through increasing stages of cognitive and non-cognitive disturbances, eliminating any possibility of independent living[3]
  • Life expectancy of the population with the disease is reduced[5][6][7]
  • The mean life expectancy following diagnosis is approximately seven years[8]
  • Fewer than 3% of patients live more than fourteen years[8]
  • Disease features significantly associated with reduced survival are an increased severity of cognitive impairment, decreased functional level, history of falls, and disturbances in the neurological examination
  • Other coincident diseases such as heart problems, diabetes, or history of alcohol abuse are also related with shortened survival[6][9][10]
  • While the earlier the age of onset the higher the total survival years, life expectancy is particularly reduced when compared to the healthy population among those who are younger[7]
  • Men have a less favorable survival prognosis than women[8][11]
  • Pneumonia and dehydration are the most frequent immediate causes of death, while cancer is a less frequent cause of death than in the general population.[5][11]

References

  1. Tarawneh R, Holtzman DM (2012). “The clinical problem of symptomatic Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment”. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2 (5): a006148. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006148. PMC 3331682. PMID 22553492.
  2. Kukull WA, Brenner DE, Speck CE, Nochlin D, Bowen J, McCormick W, Teri L, Pfanschmidt ML, Larson EB (1994). “Causes of death associated with Alzheimer disease: variation by level of cognitive impairment before death”. J Am Geriatr Soc. 42 (7): 723–6. PMID 8014346.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Förstl H, Kurz A (1999). “Clinical features of Alzheimer’s disease”. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 249 (6): 288–90. PMID 10653284.
  4. Devanand DP (1997). “Behavioral complications and their treatment in Alzheimer’s disease”. Geriatrics. 52 Suppl 2: S37–9. PMID 9307585.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Mölsä PK, Marttila RJ, Rinne UK. “Survival and cause of death in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia”. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 74 (2): 103–7. PMID 3776457. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 Bowen JD, Malter AD, Sheppard L; et al. “Predictors of mortality in patients diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s disease”. Neurology. 47 (2): 433–9. PMID 8757016.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Dodge HH, Shen C, Pandav R, DeKosky ST, Ganguli M. “Functional transitions and active life expectancy associated with Alzheimer disease”. Arch. Neurol. 60 (2): 253–9. PMID 12580712.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Mölsä PK, Marttila RJ, Rinne UK. “Long-term survival and predictors of mortality in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia”. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 91 (3): 159–64. PMID 7793228. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  9. Larson EB, Shadlen MF, Wang L; et al. “Survival after initial diagnosis of Alzheimer disease”. Ann. Intern. Med. 140 (7): 501–9. PMID 15068977.
  10. Jagger C, Clarke M, Stone A. “Predictors of survival with Alzheimer’s disease: a community-based study”. Psychol Med. 25 (1): 171–7. PMID 7792352.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, Pandav RS, DeKosky ST. “Alzheimer disease and mortality: a 15-year epidemiological study”. Arch. Neurol. 62 (5): 779–84. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.5.779. PMID 15883266.


Template:WS Template:WH

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory findings | Electrocardiogram | X-ray | CT scan | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other diagnostic studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Prevention | Future or Investigational Therapies | Social Impact | Family Impact

Related Chapters


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH