Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Myeloproliferative neoplasm

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Synonyms and keywords: MPN; Myeloproliferative disease; Myeloproliferative disorder; Myeloproliferation

Overview


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

Myeloproliferative neoplasm are a group of eight disease subtypes of the bone marrow in which excess cells are produced. Myeloproliferative neoplasm may be classified according to the World Health Organization into eight subtypes, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasm not otherwise specified, and mastocytosis.They are related to, or may evolve into, myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia, although the myeloproliferative diseases on the whole have a much better prognosis than these conditions. Clinical and pathologic features in the myeloproliferative neoplasms are due to dysregulated proliferation and expansion of myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow, resulting in altered populations of granulocytes, erythrocytes, or platelets in the peripheral blood. Myeloproliferative neoplasm is caused by a mutational events in the BCRABL, ”Janus kinase 2” (JAK2), ”calreticulin” (CALR), or myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) genes. Patients may be asymptomatic at diagnosis. However, if symptoms present, symptoms of myeloproliferative neoplasm include fever, fatigue, and bleeding. The mainstay of therapy for myeloproliferative neoplasm is chemotherapy, cytoreduction, aspirin, and palliative care.

Historical Perspective

The first description of myeloproliferative neoplasm dates back to the late 19th century, when Sir Louis Vasquez studied a patient with excess red blood cells. Myeloproliferative neoplasm was first brought to attention as an important clinical entity by Dr. William Dameshek, an American hematologist, in 1951. In 2005, the link between the JAK2 mutation and polycythemia vera was discovered. The World Health Organization created diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms in 2008, and this was revised in 2016.

Classification

Myeloproliferative neoplasm may be classified according to the World Health Organization into eight subtypes: polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms unclassifiable, and mastocytosis. Each subtypes is based on a distinct malignant cell, and each subtype has different criteria for diagnosis.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms is based on the specific subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Each of the 8 different myeloproliferative neoplasms have a slightly different pathophysiologic basis. Primary cytogenetic abnormalities have not been identified in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Aberrant activation of tyrosine kinases and associated signaling pathways is frequently implicated as the disease-initiating event for many of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. Clinical and pathologic features in the myeloproliferative neoplasms are due to dysregulated proliferation and expansion of myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow, resulting in altered populations of granulocytes, erythrocytes, or platelets in the peripheral blood.

Causes

Myeloproliferative neoplasm is caused by mutations in various genes. Different gene mutations are responsible for each of the 8 subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Importantly, multiple different gene mutations can cause a single disease.

Differentiating Myeloproliferative Neoplasm from Other Diseases

Myeloproliferative neoplasm must be differentiated from myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myelogenous leukemia, [[acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, and lymphoproliferative disorder. Each of these conditions has a unique set of causes, laboratory abnormalities, physical exam findings, and therapies.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of myeloproliferative neoplasm is approximately 7.8 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. The different subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasm have different incidence and prevalence statistics. Males are more commonly affected than females, and older persons are more commonly affected than younger persons.

Risk Factors

There are four major categories of risk factors for myeloproliferative neoplasm. Genetic mutational events comprise the most common risk factor. Other risk factors include advanced age, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, and autoimmune disease.

Screening

There are currently no guidelines for screening for myeloproliferative neoplasm. Monitoring of the complete blood count is done routinely.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

The natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasm begins with weight loss, fever, and night sweats. The natural history depends on the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Common complications of myeloproliferative neoplasm include splenomegaly, bleeding, thrombosis, bone marrow fibrosis, and acute leukemia. Prognosis depends on the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Each subtype has its own prognostic scoring system. In general, patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and chronic myeloid leukemia have better prognosis than patients with primary myelofibrosis. The prognosis is generally good with treatment.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Patients may be asymptomatic at diagnosis. However, if symptoms present, symptoms of myeloproliferative neoplasm include fever, fatigue, and bleeding.

Physical Examination

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm are usually well-appearing. Physical examination of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia is usually remarkable for skin bruising, fever, splenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy.

Laboratory Findings

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm are usually well-appearing. Physical examination of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia is usually remarkable for skin bruising, fever, splenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy.

Chest X-Ray

The chest x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm and can reveal pleural effusions, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema.

CT

Abdominal and chest CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Findings on CT scan suggestive of myeloproliferative neoplasm include enlarged lymph nodes, hepatosplenomegaly, splanchnic venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

MRI

Brain MRI is helpful in the detection of thrombotic events, such as ischemic stroke, in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm. Abdominal MRI is helpful in the detection of mesenteric thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Findings on abdominal ultrasound suggestive of myeloproliferative neoplasm include enlarged lymph nodes, hepatosplenomegaly, and ascites. Findings on extremity ultrasound include thrombosis.

Other Imaging Findings

Other imaging studies for myeloproliferative neoplasm include positron emission tomography (PET) scan, which helps to detect metastasis in bone marrow and to follow up medical treatment.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for myeloproliferative neoplasm include bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy, erythropoietin level, lumbar puncture, and lymph node biopsy.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy for myeloproliferative neoplasm is based on the specific subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. The mainstay of therapy for myeloproliferative neoplasm is chemotherapy, cytoreduction, aspirin, and palliative care. Treatment is directed at reducing the excessive numbers of blood cells.

Surgery

Surgical intervention is usually not recommended for the management of chronic myelogenous leukemia unless there is splenomegaly.

Primary Prevention

There is no established method for primary prevention of myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention measures include routine monitoring of laboratory values, including complete blood count (CBC) and metabolic panel.

Future of Investigational Therapies

Future or investigational therapies in myeloproliferative neoplasms include BLU-285, JQ1, and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. Each of these investigational agents carries a unique mechanism of action on myeloid cells. The agents are currently in clinical trials.

References

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2], Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

The first description of myeloproliferative neoplasm dates back to the late 19th century, when Sir Louis Vasquez studied a patient with excess red blood cells. Myeloproliferative neoplasm was first brought to attention as an important clinical entity by Dr. William Dameshek, an American hematologist, in 1951. In 2005, the link between the JAK2 mutation and polycythemia vera was discovered. The World Health Organization created diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms in 2008, and this was revised in 2016.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1903, Sir William Osler later described a group of patients with elevated red blood cell counts.[2]
  • In 1951, Sir William Dameshek, an American hematologist, discovered myeloproliferative neoplasms. Dr. Dameshek was a pioneer in the field and paved the way for future investigations into the details of this condition. He grouped a variety of conditions together and classified these individual conditions are myeloproliferative neoplasms.[3]
  • In 1967, Fialkow and colleagues showed evidence for clonally-derived myelopoiesis, based on studies showing the presence of the same G6PD polymorphism in erythrocytes and granulocytes. These studies suggested that one clone gave rise to multiple cell types.[1]
  • In 1976, Adamson and colleagues showed evidence for panmyeloid clonal expansion, meaning that a single clone could give rise to multiple lineages including erythrocytes, granulocytes, and megakaryocytes.[1]
  • In 2006, Pikman and colleagues found that the MPL W515L mutation was associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms.[10] It was noted that, in patients without the JAK2 V617F mutation, the MPL mutation served as the pathogenic stimulus for myeloproliferation via activation of JAK-STAT signaling.[10]
  • In 2008, the World Health Organization developed original criteria for the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm.[2]
  • In 2016, the World Health Organization developed a revision for the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasm.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Levine RL, Gilliland DG (2008). “Myeloproliferative disorders”. Blood. 112 (6): 2190–8. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-077966. PMC 2962533. PMID 18779404.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Vannucchi AM (2017). “From leeches to personalized medicine: evolving concepts in the management of polycythemia vera”. Haematologica. 102 (1): 18–29. doi:10.3324/haematol.2015.129155. PMC 5210229. PMID 27884974.
  3. Dameshek W (1951). “Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes”. Blood. 6 (4): 372–5. PMID 14820991.
  4. Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert BL, Wernig G, Huntly BJ; et al. (2005). “Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis”. Cancer Cell. 7 (4): 387–97. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.023. PMID 15837627.
  5. Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ; et al. (2005). “Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders”. Lancet. 365: 1054–1061. PMID 15781101.
  6. James C, Ugo V, Le Couedic JP; et al. (2005). “A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera”. Nature. 434 (7037): 1144–1148. PMID 15793561.
  7. Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J; et al. (2005). “Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis”. Cancer Cell. 7 (4): 387–397. PMID 15837627.
  8. Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS; et al. (2005). “A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders”. N Engl J Med. 352 (17): 1779–1790. PMID 15858187.
  9. Campbell PJ, Scott LM, Buck G; et al. (2005). “Definition of subtypes of essential thrombocythaemia and relation to polycythaemia vera based on JAK2 V617F mutation status: a prospective study”. Lancet. 366 (9501): 1945–1953. PMID 16325696.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Pikman Y, Lee BH, Mercher T, McDowell E, Ebert BL, Gozo M; et al. (2006). “MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia”. PLoS Med. 3 (7): e270. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030270. PMC 1502153. PMID 16834459.
  11. Scott LM, Tong W, Levine RL, Scott MA, Beer PA, Stratton MR; et al. (2007). “JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic erythrocytosis”. N Engl J Med. 356 (5): 459–68. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa065202. PMC 2873834. PMID 17267906.
Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2], Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

Myeloproliferative neoplasm may be classified according to the World Health Organization into eight subtypes: polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms unclassifiable, and mastocytosis. Each subtypes is based on a distinct malignant cell, and each subtype has different criteria for diagnosis.

Classification

Myeloproliferative neoplasm may be classified according to the World Health Organization into eight subtypes as follows:[1][2][3]

Disease Cell of origin W.H.O. Diagnostic criteria

Polycythemia vera

Erythroid precursor

Major criteria:

Minor criterion:

Diagnosis requires meeting all 3 major criterion or the top 2 major plus the 1 minor criterion

Essential thrombocythemia

Megakaryocyte

Major criteria:

Minor criterion:

Diagnosis requires meeting all 4 major criteria or the first 3 major plus the 1 minor criterion

Primary myelofibrosis

Megakaryocyte

Major criteria:

  • Presence of megakaryocyte proliferation and atypia with reticulin fibrosis
  • Not meeting criteria for other myeloproliferative neoplasms
  • Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation

Minor criteria:

Diagnosis requires meeting all major criteria and at least 1 minor criterion

Chronic myeloid leukemia

Common myeloid progenitor

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia

Neutrophil

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia

Eosinophil

No formal W.H.O. criteria

Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable

Variable

Not meeting criteria for other subcategories

Mastocytosis

Mast cell

Major criteria:

Minor criteria:

Diagnosis requires meeting the one major plus one minor criterion, or 3 minor criteria

References

  1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM; et al. (2016). “The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia”. Blood. 127 (20): 2391–405. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. PMID 27069254.
  2. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A; et al. (2009). “The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes”. Blood. 114 (5): 937–51. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. PMID 19357394.
  3. Valent P, Akin C, Hartmann K, Nilsson G, Reiter A, Hermine O; et al. (2017). “Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Mastocytosis: Current Status and Outlook toward the Future”. Cancer Res. 77 (6): 1261–1270. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2234. PMC 5354959. PMID 28254862.
Pathophysiology


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

The pathophysiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms is based on the specific subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Each of the 8 different myeloproliferative neoplasms have a slightly different pathophysiologic basis. Primary cytogenetic abnormalities have not been identified in the majority of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Aberrant activation of tyrosine kinases and associated signaling pathways is frequently implicated as the disease-initiating event for many of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. Clinical and pathologic features in the myeloproliferative neoplasms are due to dysregulated proliferation and expansion of myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow, resulting in altered populations of granulocytes, erythrocytes, or platelets in the peripheral blood.

Pathophysiology

Physiology

In order to understand the pathophysiology of polycythemia vera, one must understand normal physiology of erythroid cell production. Under normal conditions, the hormone erythropoietin will bind to the erythropoietin receptor on erythroid cell, resulting in activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Specifically, the erythropoietin receptor is associated with the JAK2 protein, and binding of the erythropoietin receptor by its endogenous ligand (erythropoietin) will stimulate a basal level of erythroid cell production.

Pathophysiology

In patients with polycythemia vera, this normal signaling process is excessively activated and dysregulated. The pathophysiology of polycythemia vera is well-defined and is specific to this subcategory of myeloproliferative neoplasm.

For more information, go to Polycythemia vera pathophysiology.

The pathophysiology of essential thrombocythemia is most commonly due to either a mutation in one of 3 genes: JAK2, CALR, or MPL.[1]

For more information, go to Essential thrombocytosis pathophysiology.

The pathophysiology of chronic myeloid leukemia involves the Philadelphia chromosome translocation, in which parts of two chromosomes (the 9th and 22nd by conventional karyotypic numbering) switch places. As a result, part of the BCR (“breakpoint cluster region”) gene from chromosome 22 is fused with the ABL gene on chromosome 9. This abnormal “fusion” gene generates a protein of p210 or sometimes p185. Because ABL carries a domain that can add phosphate groups to tyrosine residues (a tyrosine kinase), the BCRABL fusion gene product is also a tyrosine kinase. The fused BCRABL protein interacts with the interleukin 3beta receptor, which results in excess myeloid cell production. The BCRABL transcript is continuously active and does not require activation by other cellular messaging proteins. In turn BCRABL activates a cascade of proteins which control the cell cycle, speeding up cell division. Moreover the BCR-ABL protein inhibits DNA repair, causing genomic instability and making the cell more susceptible to developing further genetic abnormalities. The action of the BCRABL protein is the pathophysiologic cause of chronic myelogenous leukemia.[2]

The pathophysiology of primary myelofibrosis is most commonly due to either a mutation in one of 3 genes: JAK2, CALR, MPL.[1] The pathophysiology of JAK2-mutation primary myelofibrosis is similar to JAK2-mutant polycythemia vera, except that the abnormal cell is the megakaryocyte, which produces excess PDGF and TGF-beta and stimulates excess collagen production. The JAK2 mutation accounts for 59% of primary myelofibrosis cases. The CALR mutation is second most common mutation in primary myelofibrosis and accounts for 27% of cases. The pathophysiology of CALR-mutant primary myelofibrosis involves a mutation in calreticulin, which is a chaperone protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. This mutation results in aberrant activation of the thrombopoietin receptor. The least common, yet well-defined, mutation in essential thrombocythemia is the MPL mutation. This accounts for 7% of primary myelofibrosis cases. The MPL gene encodes the thrombopoietin receptor, and a point mutation involving a tryptophan codon in the MPL gene causes excess activation of this receptor, resulting in excess megakaryocyte-mediated PDGF and TGF-beta production, which creates bone marrow fibrosis.

The pathophysiology of chronic neutrophilic leukemia involves a point mutation in the colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) gene. The point mutation replaces isoleucine for threonine at the 618th position (T618I). This point mutation is pathognomonic for chronic neutrophilic leukemia, though it is a rare mutation overall and accounts for only a few hundred cases in the United States. It is found in 83% of patients with chronic neutrophilic leukemia.[3] This mutation results in aberrant activation of the receptor, which stimulating neutrophil production. Although this mutation is the most frequent driver mutation for chronic neutrophilic leukemia, other mutations that have been described in chronic neutrophilic leukemia include SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) mutations, which are also found in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. This mutation contributes to the pathophysiology of chronic neutrophilic leukemia by altering DNA replication.

The pathophysiology of chronic eosinophilic leukemia most commonly involves rearrangements affecting the platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRA and PDGFRB).[4] Upon deletion of the intervening CHIC2 locus on chromosome 4, the FIP1L1 locus (located upstream of PDGFRA) is juxtaposed to the PDGFRA locus, and FIP1L1 drives the expression of PDGFRA. This is the most frequent clonal event in hypereosinophilic syndrome.[4] Excess PDGFR expression results in stimulation of eosinophil production. Other genes that are known to be involved in chronic eosinophilic leukemia include fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) and PCM1-JAK2. Eosinophils can deposit in various organs, including the liver and heart, and this can create end-organ damage in chronic eosinophilic leukemia.

There is no specific pathophysiologic basis for myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable. However, the final pathophysiologic event is the stimulation of cells of the myeloid lineage, similar to other subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasm.

The pathophysiology of mastocytosis, or mast cell neoplasm, has been largely unknown for decades. It was later discovered the mast cell arises from the common myeloid progenitor. The most common molecular mutation in mastocytosis is the c-kit D816V mutation. The D816V mutation is found in more than 80% of patients with mastocytosis.[5] Under normal conditions, the c-kit protein (also known as CD117) allows for expansion of hematopoietic cells, which is highly regulated. In mastocytosis, aberrant c-kit activation results in excess and uncontrolled production of myeloid-derived cells, such as mast cells. c-kit is a tyrosine kinase that signals via PI3K and mTOR, and this leads to cell proliferation. Mast cells accumulate in the bone marrow, skin, and other organs. End-organ damage commonly occurs in systemic mastocytosis.[5]

Philadelphia chromosome. A piece of chromosome 9 and a piece of chromosome 22 break off and trade places. The BCR/ABL gene is formed on chromosome 22 where the piece of chromosome 9 attaches. The changed chromosome 22 is called the Philadelphia chromosome.[6]
Blood cell development. A blood stem cell goes through several steps to become a red blood cell, platelet, or white blood cell.[6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). “Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes”. Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-11-538983 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Baccarani M; European LeukemiaNet (2007). “Chronic myeloid leukaemia”. Lancet. 370 (9584): 342–50. PMID 17662883.
  3. Menezes J, Cigudosa JC (2015). “Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: a clinical perspective”. Onco Targets Ther. 8: 2383–90. doi:10.2147/OTT.S49688. PMC 4562747. PMID 26366092.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Legrand F, Renneville A, MacIntyre E, Mastrilli S, Ackermann F, Cayuela JM; et al. (2013). “The Spectrum of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Associated Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia: New Insights Based on a Survey of 44 Cases”. Medicine (Baltimore). 92 (5): e1–e9. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3182a71eba. PMC 4553979. PMID 23982058.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Gallogly MM, Lazarus HM, Cooper BW (2017). “Midostaurin: a novel therapeutic agent for patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and systemic mastocytosis”. Ther Adv Hematol. 8 (9): 245–261. doi:10.1177/2040620717721459. PMC 5639976. PMID 29051803.
  6. 6.0 6.1 National Cancer Institute. Physician Data Query Database 2015.http://www.cancer.gov/types/leukemia/patient/cml-treatment-pdq
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

Myeloproliferative neoplasm is caused by mutations in various genes. Different gene mutations are responsible for each of the 8 subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms.[1]

Causes

Myeloproliferative neoplasm subtype Causative gene mutation

Polycythemia vera

  • JAK2 V617F in 95% of cases[2]
  • CALR
  • MPL

Essential thrombocythemia

  • JAK2 V617F in 50-60% of cases[3]
  • CALR
  • MPL

Primary myelofibrosis

  • JAK2 V617F in 50-60% of cases[4]
  • CALR
  • MPL

Chronic myeloid leukemia

  • BCR-ABL
  • SETBP1 in atypical CML[5]

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia

  • CSF3R[6]
  • SETBP1 in rare cases

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia

  • FIP1L1-PDGFRA[7]
  • PDGFRB[7]
  • FGFR1[7]
  • PCM1-JAK2

Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable

  • Variable

Mastocytosis

References

  1. Ganfyd. Polycythaemia vera 2015.http://www.ganfyd.org/index.php?title=Polycythemia_vera
  2. Griesshammer M, Gisslinger H, Mesa R (2015). “Current and future treatment options for polycythemia vera”. Ann Hematol. 94 (6): 901–10. doi:10.1007/s00277-015-2357-4. PMC 4420843. PMID 25832853.
  3. Antonioli E, Carobbio A, Pieri L, Pancrazzi A, Guglielmelli P, Delaini F; et al. (2010). “Hydroxyurea does not appreciably reduce JAK2 V617F allele burden in patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia”. Haematologica. 95 (8): 1435–8. doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.021444. PMC 2913097. PMID 20418246.
  4. Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, Guglielmelli P, Martínez-Trillos A, Casetti I; et al. (2014). “Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis”. Blood. 124 (7): 1062–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-05-578435. PMC 4133481. PMID 24986690.
  5. Piazza R, Valletta S, Winkelmann N, Redaelli S, Spinelli R, Pirola A; et al. (2013). “Recurrent SETBP1 mutations in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia”. Nat Genet. 45 (1): 18–24. doi:10.1038/ng.2495. PMC 3588142. PMID 23222956.
  6. Szuber N, Tefferi A (2018). “Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: new science and new diagnostic criteria”. Blood Cancer J. 8 (2): 19. doi:10.1038/s41408-018-0049-8. PMC 5811432. PMID 29440636.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Falchi L, Verstovsek S (2015). “Eosinophilia in Hematologic Disorders”. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 35 (3): 439–52. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2015.04.004. PMC 4515577. PMID 26209894.
  8. Valent P, Akin C, Hartmann K, Nilsson G, Reiter A, Hermine O; et al. (2017). “Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Mastocytosis: Current Status and Outlook toward the Future”. Cancer Res. 77 (6): 1261–1270. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2234. PMC 5354959. PMID 28254862.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating myeloproliferative neoplasm from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hannan Javed, M.D.[2] Zahir Ali Shaikh, MD[3] Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [4] Shyam Patel [5]

Overview

Myeloproliferative neoplasm must be differentiated from myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, and lymphoproliferative disorder. Each of these conditions has a unique set of causes, laboratory abnormalities, physical exam findings, and investigations.

Differentiating Myeloproliferative Neoplasm from other Diseases

ABBREVIATIONS

EPO: Erythropoietin, FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Hb: Hemoglobin, LAD: Leukocyte alkaline dehydrgenase, LAP: Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase, LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase, LFTs: Liver function tests, NL: Normal, PCR: Polymerase chain reaction, Plt: Platelet, PUD: Peptic ulcer disease, RFTs: Renal function tests, WBCs: White blood cells.

Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Other features
Symptoms Signs CBC & Peripheral smear Bone marrow biopsy Other investigations
WBCs Hb Plt
WBC Blasts Left
shift
Baso-
phils
Eosino-
phils
Mono-
cytes
Chronic myeloid leukemia
(CML)[1][2]
<2% + NL
Polycythemia vera
(PV)[3][4][5][6]
  • Constitutional
NL or ↑ None ↑ or ↓ NL or ↑ NL ↑↑ NL
  • Hypercellularity for age with tri-lineage growth
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF)[7][8][9][10] Erythroblasts Absent NL NL
  • Variable with fibrosis or hypercellularity
Essential thrombocythemia (ET)[11][12][13]

NL or ↑

None

↓ or absent

NL

NL

↑↑

  • Normal/Hypercellular
Disease Symptoms Sign WBC Blasts Left
shift
Baso-
phils
Eosino-
phils
Mono-
cytes
Hb Plt Bone marrow biopsy Other investigations Other features
Myelodysplastic
/myeloproliferative
neoplasms
(MDS/MPN)
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)[14]
[15][16]
< 20% NL ↑↑
  • Overlapping of both, MDS and MPN
  • Absolute monocytosis > 1 × 109/L (defining feature)
  • MD-CMML:WBC ≤ 13 × 109/L (FAB)
  •  MP-CMML:WBC > 13 × 109/L (FAB)
Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), BCR-ABL1-[17][18] <20% + <2% of WBCs N/A N/A
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML)[19][20] N/A N/A N/A
MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T)[21][22][23]
  • Variable
NL or ↑ NL NL N/A N/A
Disease Symptoms Sign WBC Blasts Left
shift
Baso-
phils
Eosino-
phils
Mono-
cytes
Hb Plt Bone marrow biopsy Other investigations Other features
Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL)[24][25][26] Minimal + NL NL NL
Chronic eosinophilic leukemia,
not otherwise specified
(NOS)[27][28][29][30]
Present + ↑↑
MPN,
unclassifiable
Variable ± ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓
Mastocytosis[31][32][33][34]
  • Constitutional
None NL NL ↓ or ↑
Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms
with eosinophilia and rearrangement
of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1,
or with PCM1JAK2[35][36][37][38]
NL NL NL
  • FISH shows t(8;13) and t(8;22)
Disease Symptoms Sign WBC Blasts Left
shift
Baso-
phils
Eosino-
phils
Mono-
cytes
Hb Plt Bone marrow biopsy Other investigations Other features
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma[39][40] NL or ↑ >25% N/A ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓
Myelodysplastic syndromes
(MDS)[41][42]
Variable
  • Leukemia transformation
  • Acquired pseudo-Pelger-Huët anomaly
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
and related neoplasms[43][44]
NL or ↑ N/A ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓

with dysplasia

Blastic plasmacytoid
dendritic cell neoplasm
[45][46][47][48]
NL NL NL NL
Disease Symptoms Sign WBC Blasts Left
shift
Baso-
phils
Eosino-
phils
Mono-
cytes
Hb Plt Bone marrow biopsy Other investigations Other features
T-lymphoblastic leukemia/
lymphoma
T-lymphoblastic leukemia/
lymphoma[49][50][51]
>25% blasts (Leukemia)

<25% blasts (Lymphoma)

± ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓
  • Hypercelluarity with increased T cells precursors
Provisional entity: Natural killer (NK) cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymph[52] ± ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓
  • N/A
Provisional entity: Early T-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukemia[53][54] ± ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓ ↑ or ↓
  • Hypercelluarity with increased T cells precursors

Differentiating Myeloproliferative neoplasm from other Diseases

Characteristic Causes Physical examination Laboratory abnormalities Therapy Other associations
Myeloproliferative neoplasm
  • JAK2 mutation
  • CALR mutation
  • MPL mutation
  • BCR-ABL translocation
  • CSF3R mutation
  • SETBP1 mutation
  • PDGFRA or PDGFRB rearrangement
  • Splenomegaly
  • Hepatomegaly
  • Evidence of infection
  • Pallor
  • Ruxolitinib
  • Hydroxyurea
  • Anagrelide
  • Imatinib
  • Midostaurin
  • Stem cell transplant
  • Variable features based on the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm
Myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Prior exposure to alkylating agents
  • Prior exposure to topoisomerase II inhibitors
  • Age-related changes in hematopoietic stem cells
  • Deletion of chromosome 5q or 7
  • Gain of chromosome 8
  • Lenalidomide
  • Decitabine
  • Azacitidine
  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)
  • Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)
  • Transfusion support
  • Stem cell transplant for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Age-related changes in the bone marrow contribute to myelodysplastic syndrome
Acute myeloid leukemia
  • Chromosomal instability
  • Sporadic mutations
  • Prior exposure to benzene
  • Prior exposure to alkylating agents
  • Prior exposure to topoisomerase II inhibitors
  • Germline RUNX1 mutation
  • Pyrexia
  • Evidence of infection
  • Pallor
  • Mucosal bleeding
  • Bruising
  • Cytarabine
  • Anthracycline
  • Enasidenib
  • Liposomal daunorubicin plus cytarabine
  • Gemtuzumab ozogamycin
  • Midostaurin
  • Stem cell transplant
  • Variable prognosis based on cytogenetic and molecular profile
  • Four new FDA-approved therapies became available in 2017
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • Chromosomal instability
  • Sporadic mutations
  • Neurologic deficits
  • Pallor
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Anemia
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Neutropenia
  • Elevated LDH
  • Elevated uric acid
  • Elevated phosphorus
  • Elevated potassium
  • Low calcium
  • Greater than 20% lymphoblasts on bone marrow aspirate
  • HyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone)[56]
  • R-HyperCVAD (inclusion of rituximab)
  • Peg-asparaginase
  • Intrathecal methotrexate
  • Intrathecal cytarabine
  • Blinatumomab (bispecific T cell engager)
  • Inotuzumab ozogamycin (anti-CD22 antibody)
  • Tisagenlecleucel (chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy)
  • Stem cell transplant
  • Sanctuary sites include the central nervous system (CNS) and testes[57]
Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
  • MYD88 mutation
  • Lymphoplasmacytic cell proliferation
  • Hepatomegaly
  • Splenomegaly
  • Retinal vascular dilation and thrombosis
  • Decreased visual acuity
  • Headache
  • Elevated immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein
  • Presence of M-spike on protein electrophoresis
  • Elevated serum free light chains (kappa and lambda)
  • Increased serum viscosity
  • MYD88 mutation testing is standard-of-care
  • Plasmapheresis should be initiated if symptoms of hyperviscosity are present
  • Typically does not require stem cell transplant
Lymphoproliferative disorder[58]
  • Elevated lymphocyte count with presence of clonality
  • Anemia
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Neutropenia
  • Variable based on the etiology
  • Cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • Antiviral agents
  • Biologic therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies
  • Tapering immunosuppressive medications (for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder)
  • Can be due to a variety of causes
  • Variable prognosis

References

  1. Savage DG, Szydlo RM, Goldman JM (January 1997). “Clinical features at diagnosis in 430 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia seen at a referral centre over a 16-year period”. Br. J. Haematol. 96 (1): 111–6. PMID 9012696.
  2. Thompson PA, Kantarjian HM, Cortes JE (October 2015). “Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 90 (10): 1440–54. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.010. PMC 5656269. PMID 26434969.
  3. Vannucchi AM, Guglielmelli P, Tefferi A (March 2018). “Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: algorithmic approach”. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 25 (2): 112–119. doi:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000402. PMID 29194068.
  4. Pillai AA, Babiker HM. PMID 30252337. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. Tefferi A, Barbui T (January 2019). “Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management”. Am. J. Hematol. 94 (1): 133–143. doi:10.1002/ajh.25303. PMID 30281843.
  6. Rumi E, Cazzola M (February 2017). “Diagnosis, risk stratification, and response evaluation in classical myeloproliferative neoplasms”. Blood. 129 (6): 680–692. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-10-695957. PMC 5335805. PMID 28028026.
  7. Cervantes F, Correa JG, Hernandez-Boluda JC (May 2016). “Alleviating anemia and thrombocytopenia in myelofibrosis patients”. Expert Rev Hematol. 9 (5): 489–96. doi:10.1586/17474086.2016.1154452. PMID 26891375.
  8. Hoffman, Ronald (2018). Hematology : basic principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. ISBN 9780323357623.
  9. Michiels JJ, Bernema Z, Van Bockstaele D, De Raeve H, Schroyens W (March 2007). “Current diagnostic criteria for the chronic myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF)”. Pathol. Biol. 55 (2): 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.patbio.2006.06.002. PMID 16919893.
  10. Hoffman, Ronald (2018). Hematology : basic principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. ISBN 9780323357623.
  11. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). “Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes”. Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-083501 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. Daniel A. Arber, Attilio Orazi, Robert Hasserjian, Jurgen Thiele, Michael J. Borowitz, Michelle M. Le Beau, Clara D. Bloomfield, Mario Cazzola & James W. Vardiman (2016). “The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia”. Blood. 127 (20): 2391–2405. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. PMID 27069254. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  13. A. Tefferi, R. Fonseca, D. L. Pereira & H. C. Hoagland (2001). “A long-term retrospective study of young women with essential thrombocythemia”. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 76 (1): 22–28. doi:10.4065/76.1.22. PMID 11155408. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  14. Patnaik MM, Tefferi A (June 2016). “Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management”. Am. J. Hematol. 91 (6): 631–42. doi:10.1002/ajh.24396. PMID 27185207.
  15. Parikh SA, Tefferi A (June 2012). “Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management”. Am. J. Hematol. 87 (6): 610–9. doi:10.1002/ajh.23203. PMID 22615103.
  16. Benton CB, Nazha A, Pemmaraju N, Garcia-Manero G (August 2015). “Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Forefront of the field in 2015”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 95 (2): 222–42. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.03.002. PMC 4859155. PMID 25869097.
  17. Dao KH, Tyner JW (2015). “What’s different about atypical CML and chronic neutrophilic leukemia?”. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015: 264–71. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.264. PMC 5266507. PMID 26637732.
  18. Muramatsu H, Makishima H, Maciejewski JP (February 2012). “Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: novel pathogenetic lesions”. Semin. Oncol. 39 (1): 67–73. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.11.004. PMC 3523950. PMID 22289493.
  19. Aricò M, Biondi A, Pui CH (July 1997). “Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia”. Blood. 90 (2): 479–88. PMID 9226148.
  20. Hasle H (March 1994). “Myelodysplastic syndromes in childhood–classification, epidemiology, and treatment”. Leuk. Lymphoma. 13 (1–2): 11–26. doi:10.3109/10428199409051647. PMID 8025513.
  21. Patnaik MM, Tefferi A (March 2017). “Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) and RARS with thrombocytosis (RARS-T): 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management”. Am. J. Hematol. 92 (3): 297–310. doi:10.1002/ajh.24637. PMID 28188970.
  22. Alshaban A, Padilla O, Philipovskiy A, Corral J, McAlice M, Gaur S (2018). “Lenalidomide induced durable remission in a patient with MDS/MPN-with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis with associated 5q- syndrome”. Leuk Res Rep. 10: 37–40. doi:10.1016/j.lrr.2018.08.001. PMID 30186759.
  23. Bouchla A, Papageorgiou SG, Tsakiraki Z, Glezou E, Pavlidis G, Stavroulaki G, Bazani E, Foukas P, Pappa V (2018). “Plasmablastic Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Patient with MDS/MPN with Ring Sideroblasts and Thrombocytosis-A Case Report”. Case Rep Hematol. 2018: 2525070. doi:10.1155/2018/2525070. PMC 6247723. PMID 30524760.
  24. Szuber N, Tefferi A (February 2018). “Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: new science and new diagnostic criteria”. Blood Cancer J. 8 (2): 19. doi:10.1038/s41408-018-0049-8. PMC 5811432. PMID 29440636.
  25. Maxson JE, Tyner JW (February 2017). “Genomics of chronic neutrophilic leukemia”. Blood. 129 (6): 715–722. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-10-695981. PMC 5301820. PMID 28028025.
  26. Menezes J, Cigudosa JC (2015). “Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: a clinical perspective”. Onco Targets Ther. 8: 2383–90. doi:10.2147/OTT.S49688. PMC 4562747. PMID 26366092.
  27. Vidyadharan S, Joseph B, Nair SP (2016). “Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Presenting Predominantly with Cutaneous Manifestations”. Indian J Dermatol. 61 (4): 437–9. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.185716. PMC 4966405. PMID 27512192.
  28. Hofmans M, Delie A, Vandepoele K, Van Roy N, Van der Meulen J, Philippé J, Moors I (2018). “A case of chronic eosinophilic leukemia with secondary transformation to acute myeloid leukemia”. Leuk Res Rep. 9: 45–47. doi:10.1016/j.lrr.2018.04.001. PMC 5993353. PMID 29892549.
  29. Yamada Y, Rothenberg ME, Cancelas JA (2006). “Current concepts on the pathogenesis of the hypereosinophilic syndrome/chronic eosinophilic leukemia”. Transl Oncogenomics. 1: 53–63. PMC 3642145. PMID 23662039.
  30. Kim TH, Gu HJ, Lee WI, Lee J, Yoon HJ, Park TS (September 2016). “Chronic eosinophilic leukemia with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement”. Blood Res. 51 (3): 204–206. doi:10.5045/br.2016.51.3.204. PMID 27722133.
  31. Carter MC, Metcalfe DD, Komarow HD (February 2014). “Mastocytosis”. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 34 (1): 181–96. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2013.09.001. PMC 3863935. PMID 24262698.
  32. Macri A, Cook C. PMID 29494109. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  33. Lladó AC, Mihon CE, Silva M, Galzerano A (2014). “Systemic mastocytosis – a diagnostic challenge”. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 36 (3): 226–9. doi:10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.03.003. PMC 4109736. PMID 25031064.
  34. Valent P, Akin C, Metcalfe DD (March 2017). “Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and novel emerging treatment concepts”. Blood. 129 (11): 1420–1427. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-09-731893. PMC 5356454. PMID 28031180.
  35. Kumar, Kirthi R.; Chen, Weina; Koduru, Prasad R.; Luu, Hung S. (2015). “Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasm With Abnormalities of FGFR1 Presenting With Trilineage Blasts and RUNX1 Rearrangement”. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 143 (5): 738–748. doi:10.1309/AJCPUD6W1JLQQMNA. ISSN 1943-7722.
  36. Paolo Strati, Guilin Tang, Dzifa Y. Duose, Saradhi Mallampati, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Keyur P. Patel, Mohammad Hussaini, Abu-Sayeef Mirza, Rami S. Komrokji, Stephen Oh, John Mascarenhas, Vesna Najfeld, Vivek Subbiah, Hagop Kantarjian, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Srdan Verstovsek & Naval Daver (2018). “Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR1 rearrangement”. Leukemia & lymphoma. 59 (7): 1672–1676. doi:10.1080/10428194.2017.1397663. PMID 29119847. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  37. Ximena Montenegro-Garreaud, Roberto N. Miranda, Alexandra Reynolds, Guilin Tang, Sa A. Wang, Mariko Yabe, Wei Wang, Lianghua Fang, Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos, Pei Lin, L. Jeffrey Medeiros & Xinyan Lu (2017). “Myeloproliferative neoplasms with t(8;22)(p11.2;q11.2)/BCR-FGFR1: a meta-analysis of 20 cases shows cytogenetic progression with B-lymphoid blast phase”. Human pathology. 65: 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2017.05.008. PMID 28551329. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  38. Paola Villafuerte-Gutierrez, Montserrat Lopez Rubio, Pilar Herrera & Eva Arranz (2018). “A Case of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm with BCR-FGFR1 Rearrangement: Favorable Outcome after Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation”. Case reports in hematology. 2018: 5724960. doi:10.1155/2018/5724960. PMID 30647980.
  39. Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Garciarena P, Amin HM, Tremont-Lukats IW, de Groot JF (December 2013). “B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma presenting as seventh cranial nerve palsy”. Neurol Clin Pract. 3 (6): 532–534. doi:10.1212/CPJ.0b013e3182a78ef0. PMC 6082360. PMID 30107017.
  40. Zhang X, Rastogi P, Shah B, Zhang L (September 2017). “B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: new insights into genetics, molecular aberrations, subclassification and targeted therapy”. Oncotarget. 8 (39): 66728–66741. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19271. PMC 5630450. PMID 29029550.
  41. Germing U, Kobbe G, Haas R, Gattermann N (November 2013). “Myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment”. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 110 (46): 783–90. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2013.0783. PMC 3855821. PMID 24300826.
  42. Gangat N, Patnaik MM, Tefferi A (January 2016). “Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat”. Am. J. Hematol. 91 (1): 76–89. doi:10.1002/ajh.24253. PMID 26769228.
  43. Islam A, Catovsky D, Goldman JM, Galton DA (September 1985). “Bone marrow biopsy changes in acute myeloid leukaemia. I: Observations before chemotherapy”. Histopathology. 9 (9): 939–57. PMID 3864727.
  44. Orazi A (2007). “Histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases”. Pathobiology. 74 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1159/000101709. PMID 17587881.
  45. F. Julia, T. Petrella, M. Beylot-Barry, M. Bagot, D. Lipsker, L. Machet, P. Joly, O. Dereure, M. Wetterwald, M. d’Incan, F. Grange, J. Cornillon, G. Tertian, E. Maubec, P. Saiag, S. Barete, I. Templier, F. Aubin & S. Dalle (2013). “Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: clinical features in 90 patients”. The British journal of dermatology. 169 (3): 579–586. doi:10.1111/bjd.12412. PMID 23646868. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  46. Livio Pagano, Caterina Giovanna Valentini, Alessandro Pulsoni, Simona Fisogni, Paola Carluccio, Francesco Mannelli, Monia Lunghi, Gianmatteo Pica, Francesco Onida, Chiara Cattaneo, Pier Paolo Piccaluga, Eros Di Bona, Elisabetta Todisco, Pellegrino Musto, Antonio Spadea, Alfonso D’Arco, Stefano Pileri, Giuseppe Leone, Sergio Amadori & Fabio Facchetti (2013). “Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: an Italian multicenter study”. Haematologica. 98 (2): 239–246. doi:10.3324/haematol.2012.072645. PMID 23065521. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  47. Joseph D. Khoury (2018). “Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm”. Current hematologic malignancy reports. 13 (6): 477–483. doi:10.1007/s11899-018-0489-z. PMID 30350260. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  48. Shinichiro Sukegawa, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Ryota Matsuoka, Haruka Momose, Yusuke Kiyoki, Masayuki Noguchi, Naoya Nakamura, Rei Watanabe, Manabu Fujimoto, Yasuhisa Yokoyama, Hidekazu Nishikii, Takayasu Kato, Manabu Kusakabe, Naoki Kurita, Naoshi Obara, Yuichi Hasegawa & Shigeru Chiba (2018). “[Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm accompanied by chronic myelomonocytic leukemia successfully treated with azacitidine]”. [[[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology]]. 59 (12): 2567–2573. doi:10.11406/rinketsu.59.2567. PMID 30626790.
  49. You MJ, Medeiros LJ, Hsi ED (September 2015). “T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 144 (3): 411–22. doi:10.1309/AJCPMF03LVSBLHPJ. PMID 26276771.
  50. Patel KJ, Latif SU, de Calaca WM (March 2009). “An unusual presentation of precursor T cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with cholestatic jaundice: case report”. J Hematol Oncol. 2: 12. doi:10.1186/1756-8722-2-12. PMC 2663564. PMID 19284608.
  51. Elreda L, Sandhu M, Sun X, Bekele W, Cohen AJ, Shah M (2014). “T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: relapse 16 years after first remission”. Case Rep Hematol. 2014: 359158. doi:10.1155/2014/359158. PMC 4005062. PMID 24822133.
  52. Sedick Q, Alotaibi S, Alshieban S, Naheet KB, Elyamany G (2017). “Natural Killer Cell Lymphoblastic Leukaemia/Lymphoma: Case Report and Review of the Recent Literature”. Case Rep Oncol. 10 (2): 588–595. doi:10.1159/000477843. PMID 28868017.
  53. Jain N, Lamb AV, O’Brien S, Ravandi F, Konopleva M, Jabbour E, Zuo Z, Jorgensen J, Lin P, Pierce S, Thomas D, Rytting M, Borthakur G, Kadia T, Cortes J, Kantarjian HM, Khoury JD (April 2016). “Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype”. Blood. 127 (15): 1863–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2015-08-661702. PMC 4915808. PMID 26747249.
  54. Haydu JE, Ferrando AA (July 2013). “Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia”. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 20 (4): 369–73. doi:10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283623c61. PMC 3886681. PMID 23695450.
  55. Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T; et al. (2017). “Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel”. Blood. 129 (4): 424–447. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. PMC 5291965. PMID 27895058.
  56. Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M (2017). “Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update”. Blood Cancer J. 7 (6): e577. doi:10.1038/bcj.2017.53. PMC 5520400. PMID 28665419.
  57. Inaba H, Greaves M, Mullighan CG (2013). “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia”. Lancet. 381 (9881): 1943–55. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62187-4. PMC 3816716. PMID 23523389.
  58. Kipps TJ, Stevenson FK, Wu CJ, Croce CM, Packham G, Wierda WG; et al. (2017). “Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3: 16096. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.96. PMC 5336551. PMID 28102226.
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

The incidence of myeloproliferative neoplasm is approximately 7.8 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. The different subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasm have different incidence and prevalence statistics. Males are more commonly affected than females, and older persons are more commonly affected than younger persons.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence of myeloproliferative neoplasm is approximately 7.8 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.[1] This statistic includes all eight subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasm. There are varying incidences for the different subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasm.
  • The incidence of polycythemia vera is 0.4-2.8 per 100,000 persons per year.[2]
  • The incidence of essential thrombocythemia is 0.38-1.7 per 100,000 persons per year.[2]
  • The incidence of primary myelofibrosis is 0.1-1 per 100,000 persons per year.[2]

Prevalence

  • The prevalence of myeloproliferative neoplasm depends on the particular subtype.
  • The prevalence of polycythemia vera is 44-57 per 100,000 persons.[2]
  • The prevalence of essential thrombocythemia is 38-57 per 100,000 persons.[2]
  • The prevalence of primary myelofibrosis is 4-6 per 100,000 persons.[2]

Age

  • The prevalence of myeloproliferative neoplasm increases with age.[3]
  • The average age of diagnosis is 60-70.[3]

Gender

  • Males are more commonly affected with myeloproliferative neoplasm than females.[3]
  • Females are more likely to be affected by the abdominal symptoms of myeloproliferative neoplasm.[4]
  • Females are also more likely to develop thrombocytopenia than males.[4].
  • Females have a shorter disease duration.

Race

The prevalence of myeloproliferative neoplasm does not vary by race.[3]

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. WTC Health Program.Myeloid Malignancieshttp://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/WTCHP_PP_MyeloidMalignancies_02012014.pdf
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Agarwal MB, Malhotra H, Chakrabarti P, Varma N, Mathews V, Bhattacharyya J; et al. (2015). “Myeloproliferative neoplasms working group consensus recommendations for diagnosis and management of primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 36 (1): 3–16. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.151770. PMC 4363847. PMID 25810569.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, Strom SS, Merritt WD, Ries LA; et al. (2008). “Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs”. Blood. 112 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-01-134858. PMID 18443215.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Geyer HL, Kosiorek H, Dueck AC, Scherber R, Slot S, Zweegman S; et al. (2017). “Associations between gender, disease features and symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: an analysis by the MPN QOL International Working Group”. Haematologica. 102 (1): 85–93. doi:10.3324/haematol.2016.149559. PMC 5210236. PMID 27540137.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

There are four major categories of risk factors for myeloproliferative neoplasm. Genetic mutational events comprise the most common risk factor. Other risk factors include advanced age, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, and autoimmune disease.

Risk factors

  • Mutations: Genetic mutations are the most important risk factors for development of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL are the most common risk factors for myeloproliferative neoplasms and are causative mutations in the disease. There are multiple other genetic mutations associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms (please see Causes section).
  • Advanced age: Age is a major risk factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Aging is associated with the acquisition of mutations in cells, and these mutations can lead to the development of hematologic malignancies.
  • Prior cytotoxic therapy: Treatment-related myeloproliferative neoplasms is emerging as an important clinical entity to recognize [1] Patients who receive chemotherapy for other conditions are at risk for developing myeloproliferative neoplasms after many years. The reason for treatment related myeloproliferation is that cytotoxic agents induce DNA damage, which results in increased oncogenic potential within cells. Alkylating agents and topoisomerase II inhibitors are the most commonly implicated agents. Hydroxyurea is also implicated in the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms.
  • Autoimmunity: A prior history of autoimmune disease is associated with a risk for developing myeloproliferative neoplasms.[2] The etiology for the link between autoimmunity and myeloproliferative neoplasm is thought to be antigenic stimulation which results in immune cell activation and aberrant proliferation. There is specifically an increased risk of myeloproliferative neoplasm is patients with:

References

  1. Björkholm M, Derolf AR, Hultcrantz M, Kristinsson SY, Ekstrand C, Goldin LR; et al. (2011). “Treatment-related risk factors for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in myeloproliferative neoplasms”. J Clin Oncol. 29 (17): 2410–5. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7542. PMC 3107755. PMID 21537037.
  2. Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Samuelsson J, Björkholm M, Goldin LR (2010). “Autoimmunity and the risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms”. Haematologica. 95 (7): 1216–20. doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.020412. PMC 2895049. PMID 20053870.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

There are currently no guidelines for screening for myeloproliferative neoplasm. Monitoring of the complete blood count is done routinely.

Screening

There are currently no guidelines for screening for myeloproliferative neoplasm. Routine monitoring of complete blood count (CBC) once yearly is sufficient for screening for hematologic diseases in general.[1]


References

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamad Alkateb, MBBCh [2] Shyam Patel [3]

Overview

The natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasm begins with weight loss, fever, and night sweats. The natural history depends on the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Common complications of myeloproliferative neoplasm include splenomegaly, bleeding, thrombosis, bone marrow fibrosis, and acute leukemia. Prognosis depends on the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Each subtype has its own prognostic scoring system. In general, patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and chronic myeloid leukemia have better prognosis than patients with primary myelofibrosis. The prognosis is generally good with treatment.

Natural History

The symptoms of myeloproliferative neoplasm usually develop in the sixth decade of life and start with symptoms such as anorexia, weight loss, and fatigue. The onset of symptoms is usually insidious, and the symptoms do not frequently cause many problems initially. The disease progresses quite slowly, typically over a period of months to years. However, without treatment, patients will develop severe symptoms, such as abdominal pain, bruising, bleeding, thrombosis, fever, and infection which may eventually lead to death.[1][2] The natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasm is dependent upon the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm and by the prognostic group. The natural history of myelodysplastic syndrome / myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndrome (MDS/MPN) is poor.[3] In general, the natural history of patients above the age of 60, the presence of a JAK2 mutation, and a history of thrombosis is worse than the natural history of patients under age 60, the absence of JAK2 mutation, and no history of thrombosis.[4] Thrombosis is an inevitable part of the natural history of many subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Approximately 41% of patients with polycythemia vera, for example, will experience thrombosis.[5]

Complications

Myeloproliferative neoplasm may lead to the following complications:[6][7][8][9][10][11]

  • Thrombosis: Clot formation occurs in 15% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.
  • Bleeding: Bleeding is especially common in patients with essential thrombocythemia with very high platelet counts, as this leads to a paradoxical effect known as acquired von Willebrand disease. In this condition, platelets interfere with the function of von Willebrand factor.
  • Epistaxis: Bleeding can occur in the anterior or posterior circulation of the nasal cavity.
  • Gingival bleeding: Bleeding gums is typically seen after brushing teeth.
  • Menorrhagia: Pelvis bleeding commonly occurs in pre-menopausal females.
  • Metrorrhagia: Irregular pelvic bleeding can occur in pre-menopausal females.
  • Petechiae: Pinpoint hemorrhages can occur in the skin.
  • Myelofibrosis: This is a condition in which the bone marrow becomes replaced by collagen and reticulin fibers. When myelofibrosis occurs in the setting of polycythemia vera, it is referred to as post-polycythemia vera (post-PV) myelofibrosis. When myelofibrosis occurs in the setting of essential thrombocythemia, it is referred to as post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET) myelofibrosis. Myelofibrosis carries an overall poor prognosis given that collagen fibers preclude normal hematopoiesis, resulting in infections, bleeding, and fatigue.
  • Acute myeloid leukemia: This is a malignancy of the hematopoietic stem cell (specifically myeloid precursors). It is characterized by clonal proliferation and resultant cytopenias and ineffective hematopoiesis. Patients typically die as a result of infections and/or bleeding.
  • End-organ damage: Deposition of myeloid cells in organs can result in permanent organ damage. This is especially true to chronic eosinophilic leukemia, in which eosinophils can deposit in the lungs, heart, or other tissues and impair the function of these organs.

Prognosis

The prognosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm depends upon the subtype. Each subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm has a different prognostication system. Overall, the prognosis for patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and chronic myeloid leukemia is good, and prognosis of primary myelofibrosis is worse. For example, the median survival of patients with polycythemia vera is 33 years.[12] The median survival of patients with essential thrombocythemia is 24 years.

In polycythemia vera, patients are prognosticated based on two risk groups as follows:

Prognostic Group Defining Features

Low risk

  • No history of thrombosis, and
  • Age < 60

High risk

  • History of thrombosis, or
  • Age > 60

In essential thrombocythemia, patients are prognosticated based on four risk groups as follows:[12]

Prognostic Group Defining Features

Very low risk

  • No history of thrombosis
  • Age < 60
  • JAK2 or MPL wild-type

Low risk

  • No history of thrombosis
  • Age < 60
  • JAK2 or MPL mutation present

Intermediate risk

  • No history of thrombosis
  • Age > 60
  • JAK2 or MPL wild-type

High risk

  • History of thrombosis, or
  • Age > 60 with JAK2 or MPL mutation present

In primary myelofibrosis, patients are prognosticated into four risk groups, based on the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). The adverse prognostic features are age > 65 years, white blood cell count > 25,000/microliter, hemoglobin < 10 g/dl, peripheral blood blast count > 1%, and presence of constitutional symptoms. Each adverse prognostic feature is assigned 1 point (except 2 points for hemoglobin < 10g/dl).[12]

Prognostic Group Points

Low risk

0

Intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk

1 or 2

Intermediate-2 (INT-2) risk

3 or 4

High risk

5 or 6

Recently, the DIPSS scoring system was revised to 3 additional adverse features. These adverse features include platelet count < 100,000 per microliter, transfusion dependence, and unfavorable karyotype (monosomy 5, monosomy 7, trisomy 8, isochromosome 17, chromosome 11q23 rearrangement (MLL gene rearrangement). This new system is known as DIPSS-Plus and is used when karyotype information is available.[12]

Prognostic Group Points

Low risk

0

Intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk

1

Intermediate-2 (INT-2) risk

2 or 3

High risk

4 to 6

In chronic myeloid leukemia, the prognostication is based on the Sokal score, which includes age, spleen size, platelet count, and blast count.

Prognostic Group Sokal Score Median Survival

Low risk

< 0.8

5 years

Intermediate risk

0.8-1.2

2-2.5 years

High risk

>1.2

2.5 years

Without treatment, Myeloproliferative neoplasm may result in death. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for myeloproliferative neoplasm are 74% to 93% and 61% to 84%, respectively. Gene expression profiling may eventually have an important role in the prognostication of myeloproliferative neoplasm.[13]

References

  1. Ma X, Does M, Raza A, Mayne ST (2007). “Myelodysplastic syndromes: incidence and survival in the United States”. Cancer. 109 (8): 1536–42. doi:10.1002/cncr.22570. PMID 17345612.
  2. Agarwal MB, Malhotra H, Chakrabarti P, Varma N, Mathews V, Bhattacharyya J; et al. (2015). “Myeloproliferative neoplasms working group consensus recommendations for diagnosis and management of primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 36 (1): 3–16. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.151770. PMC 4363847. PMID 25810569.
  3. DiNardo CD, Daver N, Jain N, Pemmaraju N, Bueso-Ramos C, Yin CC; et al. (2014). “Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN, U): natural history and clinical outcome by treatment strategy”. Leukemia. 28 (4): 958–61. doi:10.1038/leu.2014.8. PMC 3981947. PMID 24492324.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Vannucchi AM (2017). “From leeches to personalized medicine: evolving concepts in the management of polycythemia vera”. Haematologica. 102 (1): 18–29. doi:10.3324/haematol.2015.129155. PMC 5210229. PMID 27884974.
  5. Stein BL, Oh ST, Berenzon D, Hobbs GS, Kremyanskaya M, Rampal RK; et al. (2015). “Polycythemia Vera: An Appraisal of the Biology and Management 10 Years After the Discovery of JAK2 V617F”. J Clin Oncol. 33 (33): 3953–60. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6474. PMC 4979103. PMID 26324368.
  6. Canadian Cancer Society.2015.http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/leukemia/leukemia/polycythemia-vera/?region=ab
  7. Zoraster RM, Rison RA (2013). “Acute embolic cerebral ischemia as an initial presentation of polycythemia vera: a case report”. J Med Case Rep. 7: 131. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-7-131. PMC 3668271. PMID 23683307.
  8. Buzas C, Sparchez Z, Cucuianu A, Manole S, Lupescu I, Acalovschi M (2009). “Budd-Chiari syndrome secondary to polycythemia vera. A case report”. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 18 (3): 363–6. PMID 19795034.
  9. Biagioni E, Pedrazzi P, Marietta M, Di Benedetto F, Villa E, Luppi M; et al. (2013). “Successful liver transplantation in a patient with splanchnic vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism due to polycythemia vera with Jak2v617f mutation and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia”. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 36 (3): 352–4. doi:10.1007/s11239-012-0832-5. PMID 23277116.
  10. Reikvam H, Tiu RV (2012). “Venous thromboembolism in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera”. Leukemia. 26 (4): 563–71. doi:10.1038/leu.2011.314. PMID 22076463.
  11. “Erratum: Borderud SP, Li Y, Burkhalter JE, Sheffer CE and Ostroff JS. Electronic cigarette use among patients with cancer: Characteristics of electronic cigarette users and their smoking cessation outcomes. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/ cncr.28811”. Cancer. 121 (5): 800. 2015. PMID 25855820.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T (2018). “Essential thrombocythemia treatment algorithm 2018”. Blood Cancer J. 8 (1): 2. doi:10.1038/s41408-017-0041-8. PMC 5802626. PMID 29321520.
  13. Spivak JL, Considine M, Williams DM, Talbot CC, Rogers O, Moliterno AR; et al. (2014). “Two clinical phenotypes in polycythemia vera”. N Engl J Med. 371 (9): 808–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1403141. PMC 4211877. PMID 25162887.
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH