Lymphogranuloma venereum
For patient information, click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Synonyms and keywords: Durand-Nicolas-Favre disease; Nicolas-Favre disease; LGV; lymphogranuloma inguinale; lymphopathia venereum; lymphopathia venerea; poradenitis inguinale; poradentitis; tropical bubo; climatic bubo; strumous bubo; sixth venereal disease
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), also known as lymphopathia venerea, tropical bubo, climatic bubo, strumous bubo, poradenitis inguinales, Durand-Nicolas-Favre disease, lymphogranuloma inguinale and neekerisankkeri in Finland, is a sexually transmitted disease caused by the invasive serovars L1, L2, or L3 of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Historical Perspective
LGV was first described by Wallace in 1833 and again by Durand, Nicolas, and Favre in 1913.
Pathophysiology
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) is caused by serovars L1, L2, or L3 of the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis. C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen transmitted through vaginal, anal, or oral sexual contact. C. trachomatis alternates between two forms: the infectious elementary body (EB) and noninfectious, replicating reticulate body (RB). EBs enter through skin abrasions or microabrasion, or by crossing mucous membranes. EBs produce major out membrane protein (MOMP), which binds to heparan sulfate receptors on epithelial cells and are then phagocytized forming chlamydial inclusions. EBs begin to differentiate into RBs that start replicating. Endocytosis and bacterial replication cause host cell destruction leading to the formation of a papule at the site of inoculation. EBs and RBs then travel through lymphatics to regional lymph nodes, primarily to inguinal lymph nodes. C. trachomatis continues to replicate within monocytes causing lymphadenopathy and eventually the formation of buboes. Associated conditions include coinfection with other sexually transmitted diseases.
Causes
Chlamydia trachomatis is a Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen causing Lymphogranuloma venereum.
Classification
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) may be classified into three stages: primary LGV characterized by a self-limited papule, secondary LGV characterized by painful lymphadenopathy, and tertiary LGV (genitoanorectal syndrome) characterized by proctocolitis.
Differential Diagnosis
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause genital ulcers, lymphadenopathy, or proctocolitis including syphilis, Herpes simplex, Behçet’s disease, chancroid, donovanosis, fixed drug eruption, psoriasis, chlamydial diseases caused by C. trachomatis serovars D-K, and diseases characterized with colitis. Sexually transmitted diseases characterized as genital ulcer diseases will present with the most similar symptoms to LGV.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) is rare in developed countries but the disease has become prevalent in the men who have sex with men (MSM) population. Outbreaks in MSM have occurred in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany and United States. LGV is seen most commonly in white individuals whose ages range from 15 to 40 years. Males typically present and earlier stages than females.
Risk Factors
Risk factors for developing lymphogranuloma venereum include HIV-positive serostatus, unprotected sexual intercourse (anal intercourse higher risk than vaginal intercourse) and multiple sex partners.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
After an incubation period of 3 – 30 days for Chlamydia trachomatis, a papule develops at the point of inoculation and may ulcerate. The lesion is self-limited and heals in approximately a week. Lymphadenopathy of the inguinal and femoral lymph nodes develops 2 – 6 weeks after onset the primary lesion. Inguinal lymph nodes may develop into fluctuant, suppurative buboes or nonsuppurative abscesses. Iliac and perirectal lymphadenopathy may also develop in patients with rectal exposure, accompanied by hemorrhagic proctocolitis. Chronic inflammation may lead to perirectal fistulas and/or strictures, as well as sclerosing fibrosis that results in elephantiasis of genitalia, esthiomene in women, and frozen pelvis syndrome. Systemic spread may result in arthritis, hepatitis or perihepatitis, pneumonitis, cardiac involvment (rare), aseptic meningitis (rare), ocular inflammatory disease (rare). Prognosis is poor without treatment. However, spontaneous remission is possible. Death can occur from bowel obstruction or perforation.
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
The most common symptom of primary LGV is a painless papule or ulcer. Secondary LGV is characterized by painful inguinal and/or femoral lymphadenopathy, or Iliac and/or perirectal lymphadenopathy in patients with rectal exposure. Proctolcolits may also develop at this stage. Tertiary LGV symptoms include Lymphatic and rectal fibrosis, genital elephantiasis, esthiomene (chronic ulcerative disease of vulva), edema, tenesmus and rectal discharge. LGV may spread systemically and cause the following symptoms: fever, chills, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, arthritis, hepatitis or perihepatitis, and pneumonitis.
Physical Examination
Primary LGV is characterized by a small, nontender papule or ulcer. The primary lesion is typically unnoticed so few patients present at this stage. Majority of patients that do present are male. Secondary LGV is characterized by tender, swollen lymph nodes, typically unilateral, known as buboes. Enlarged inguinal and/or femoral lymph nodes occur after primary lesion of anterior genital area. Enlarged iliac and/or perirectal lymph nodes occure after primary lesion of posterior genital area. 20% of patients present with “groove sign”. Buboes may be indurated or draining sinuses. Tertiary LGV is characterized by [perirectal]] fistulas and/or strictures, ulcerative proctitis, and/or Elephantiasis of gentials. Males may present with “saxophone penis“. Females may present with with ulceration and thickening of the vulva.
Laboratory Findings
Because of limitations in commercially available tests, clinical presentation, in conjunction to laboratory findings, plays an important role in diagnosis. C. trachomatis can be identified from lesion swabs, bubo aspirate, or rectal mucosa swabs (in patients with proctitis) using culture methods, serologic testing, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Culture is impractical since it is time consuming and lacks sensitivity. Compliment fixation and immunofluorescence serologic tests are sensitive but only genus specific. NAATs are the most reliable method for detecting C. trachomatis and real-time PCR can detect the LGV-specific serovar.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
There is no vaccine against the bacteria. LGV can be treated with three weeks of antibiotics. CDC STD Treatment Guidelines recommend the use of doxycyline, twice a day for 21 days. An alternative treatment is erythromycin base or azithromycin. The health care provider will determine which is best.
Surgery
Needle aspiration or incision and drainage of inguinal buboes may be required to prevent ulcer or sinus formation. Patients with rectal strictures as a complication of LGV may need surgery to prevent bowel obstruction and bowel infarction.
Primary Prevention
Since there is no vaccine for LGV, methods of primary prevention include: abstaining from sexual activity, limiting number of sexual partners and using a male or female condom. The goal of secondary prevention is to stop the spread of disease. Therefore infected individuals should abstain from sexual intercourse until symptoms reside.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum was described first by Wallace in 1833 and again by Durand, Nicolas, and Favre in 1913.
Historical Perspective
- Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) was first described by Wallace in 1833.
- Clinical aspects of LGV were described by N. Joseph Durand, Maurice Favre, and Joseph Nicolas in 1913.[1]
- An outbreak in the Netherlands in 2004 among gay men has led to greater surveillance of LGV in Europe and the United States.[2][3]
References
- ↑ Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
- ↑ Richardson D, Goldmeier D (2007). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: an emerging cause of proctitis in men who have sex with men”. Int J STD AIDS. 18 (1): 11–4, quiz 15. doi:10.1258/095646207779949916. PMID 17326855.
- ↑ Lymphogranuloma venereum. Wikipedia (December 3, 2015). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymphogranuloma_venereum Accessed February 98, 2016.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) is caused by serovars L1, L2, or L3 of the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis. C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen transmitted through vaginal, anal, or oral sexual contact. C. trachomatis alternates between two forms: the infectious elementary body (EB) and noninfectious, replicating reticulate body (RB). EBs enter through skin abrasions or microabrasion, or by crossing mucous membranes. EBs produce major out membrane protein (MOMP), which binds to heparan sulfate receptors on epithelial cells and are then phagocytized forming chlamydial inclusions. EBs begin to differentiate into RBs that start replicating. Endocytosis and bacterial replication cause host cell destruction leading to the formation of a papule at the site of inoculation. EBs and RBs then travel through lymphatics to regional lymph nodes, primarily to inguinal lymph nodes. C. trachomatis continues to replicate within monocytes causing lymphadenopathy and eventually the formation of buboes. Associated conditions include coinfection with other sexually transmitted diseases.
Pathophysiology
Transmission
- Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) may develop after transmission of servars L1, L2, or L3 of the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis.
- C. trachomatis can be transmitted through vaginal, anal, or oral sexual contact.[1]
- C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen.[2]
Pathogenesis
- Inoculation and replication of C. trachomatis serovars L1, L2, or L3 depends on alternation between two forms of the bacterium: the infectious elementary body (EB) and noninfectious, replicating reticulate body (RB).[3]
- The EB form is responsible for inoculation with C. trachomatis.
- The C. trachomatis EB enters the body through skin abrasions, microabrasions incurred during sexual intercourse or by crossing epithelial cells of mucous membranes.[4]
- C. trachomatis produces the extracellular ligand major outer membrane protein (MOMP), which is presumed to bind with heparan sulfate host epithelial cells.[3]
- Once bound, the EB is engulfed by receptor-mediated endocytosis creating vacuoles termed “inclusions”.[5]
- EB inclusions are able to avoid lysosomal fusion, thus preventing their destruction.
- Once inside the host cell, EBs immediately start differentiating into reticulate bodies (RBs) that undergo replication.
- The process of endocytosis and accumulation of RBs within host epithelial cells causes host cell destruction (necrosis) which leads to the formation of a papule at the site of inoculation which may ulcerate, depending on the extent of infection and number or EBs transmitted.[5]
- After necrosis, EBs and RBs travel via lymphatics to regional lymph nodes, primarily to inguinal lymph nodes.
- Systemic infection occurs when this process repeats as C. trachomatis is phagocytized by and continues to replicate in monocytes, causing lymphadenopathy and eventually the formation of inguinal buboes.[1]
Virulence Factors
- C. trachomatis produces major outer membrane protein (MOMP), which is responsible for attachment of C. trachomatis EBs to mucous membrane epithelial cells
- Functional MOMP is required for C. trachomatis infection.[6]
Adhesion
- MOMP is 40 kDa ligand composed of 4 symmetrically spaced variable domains (VDs) I to IV.
- VD II and IV have been identified as the domains responsible for attachment:[6]
- VD II structure promotes electrostatic interactions
- VD IV structure promotes hydrophobic interactions
Associated Conditions
Coinfection with other sexually transmitted diseases including:
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
- ↑ Datta B, Njau F, Thalmann J, Haller H, Wagner AD (2014). “Differential infection outcome of Chlamydia trachomatis in human blood monocytes and monocyte-derived dendritic cells”. BMC Microbiol. 14: 209. doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0209-3. PMC 4236547. PMID 25123797.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Taraktchoglou M, Pacey AA, Turnbull JE, Eley A (2001). “Infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar LGV but not E is dependent on host cell heparan sulfate”. Infect Immun. 69 (2): 968–76. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.2.968-976.2001. PMC 97976. PMID 11159992.
- ↑ Mabey D, Peeling RW (2002). “Lymphogranuloma venereum”. Sex Transm Infect. 78 (2): 90–2. PMC 1744436. PMID 12081191.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Moulder JW (1991). “Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro”. Microbiol Rev. 55 (1): 143–90. PMC 372804. PMID 2030670.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Su H, Watkins NG, Zhang YX, Caldwell HD (1990). “Chlamydia trachomatis-host cell interactions: role of the chlamydial major outer membrane protein as an adhesin”. Infect Immun. 58 (4): 1017–25. PMC 258576. PMID 2318528.
Causes
To learn about other chlamydial infections caused by species other than C. trachomatis, click here.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aysha Anwar, M.B.B.S[2]
Overview
- Chlamydia trachomatis, an obligate intracellular human pathogen, is one of four bacterial species in the genus Chlamydia.[1]
- C. trachomatis is a Gram-negative bacterium, therefore its cell wall components retain the counter-stain safranin and appear pink under a light microscope.[2] It is ovoid in shape.[3]
- C. trachomatis includes three human biovars, based on variations in the major outer membrane protein (MOMP):
- serovars Ab, B, Ba, or C — cause trachoma: infection of the eyes, which can lead to blindness
- serovars D-K — cause urethritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, neonatal pneumonia, and neonatal conjunctivitis
- serovars L1, L2 and L3 — lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)[4]
- The L2 serovar can be further differentiated into L2, L2′, L2a, and L2b based on significant amino acid differences[5]
- Chlamydia can exchange DNA between its different strains, thus the evolution of new strains is common.[7]
Identification
Chlamydia species are readily identified and distinguished from other Chlamydia species using DNA-based tests.
Most strains of C. trachomatis are recognized by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to epitopes in the VS4 region of MOMP.[8] However, these mAbs may also cross-react with two other Chlamydia species, C. suis and C. muridarum.
Life-cycle
Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens, which means they are unable to replicate outside of a host cell. However, to facilitate effective dissemination, these pathogens have evolved a distinct biphasic life cycle wherein they alternate between two functionally and morphologically distinct forms.
- The elementary body (EB) is infectious, but metabolically inert (much like a spore), and can survive for limited amounts of time in the extracellular milieu. Once the EB attaches to a susceptible host cell, it mediates its own internalization through pathogen-specified mechanisms (via type III secretion system) that allows for the recruitment of actin with subsequent engulfment of the bacterium.
- The internalized EB, within a membrane-bound compartment, immediately begins differentiation into the reticulate body (RB). RBs are metabolically active but non-infectious, and in many regards, resemble normal replicating bacteria. The intracellular bacteria rapidly modifies its membrane-bound compartment into the so-called chlamydial inclusion so as to prevent phagosome-lysosome fusion. The inclusion is thought to have no interactions with the endocytic pathway and apparently inserts itself into the exocytic pathway as it retains the ability to intercept sphingomyelin-containing vesicles.
- The mechanism by which the host cell protein is trafficked to the inclusion through the exocytic pathway is not fully understood. As the RBs replicate, the inclusion grows as well to accommodate the increasing numbers of organisms. Through unknown mechanisms, RBs begin a differentiation program back to the infectious EBs, which are released from the host cell to initiate a new round of infection. Because of their obligate intracellular nature, Chlamydiae have no tractable genetic system, unlike E. coli, which makes Chlamydiae and related organisms difficult to investigate.
Diseases caused by Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia trachomatis can cause the following conditions:[9][10][11][12]
- Cervicitis
- Conjunctivitis
- Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome
- Lymphogranuloma venereum
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Pneumonia in infants
- Reactive arthritis
- Urethritis
- Rectal infection (proctitis)
- Prostatitis
- Ectopic pregnancy
Gallery
-
Photomicrograph of Chlamydia trachomatis taken from a urethral scrape. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]
-
McCoy cell monolayers with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion bodies (200X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]
-
McCoy cell monolayers with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion bodies (50X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]
-
Photomicrograph depicts HeLa cells infected with Type-A Chlamydia trachomatis (400X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]
-
Patient’s left eye with the upper lid retracted in order to reveal the inflamed conjunctival membrane lining the inside of both the upper and lower lids, due to what was determined to be a case of inclusion conjunctivitis caused by the bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]
References
- ↑ Ryan KJ, Ray CG (editors) (2004). Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. pp. 463–70. ISBN 0-8385-8529-9.
- ↑ “Chlamydia”. MicrobeWiki. Department of Biology, Kenyon College. 2006-08-15. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- ↑ Malhotra M, Sood S, Mukherjee A, Muralidhar S, Bala M (September 2013). “Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update”. Indian J. Med. Res. 138 (3): 303–16. PMC 3818592. PMID 24135174.
- ↑ Fredlund H, Falk L, Jurstrand M, Unemo M (2004). “Molecular genetic methods for diagnosis and characterisation of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: impact on epidemiological surveillance and interventions”. APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. 112 (11–12): 771–84. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11211-1205.x. PMID 15638837.
- ↑ Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
- ↑ Carlson JH, Whitmire WM, Crane DD; et al. (June 2008). “The Chlamydia trachomatis Plasmid Is a Transcriptional Regulator of Chromosomal Genes and a Virulence Factor”. Infection and immunity. 76 (6): 2273–83. doi:10.1128/IAI.00102-08. PMC 2423098. PMID 18347045.
- ↑ Harris SR, Clarke IN, Seth-Smith HM; et al. (April 2012). “Whole-genome analysis of diverse Chlamydia trachomatis strains identifies phylogenetic relationships masked by current clinical typing”. Nat. Genet. 44 (4): 413–9, S1. doi:10.1038/ng.2214. PMC 3378690. PMID 22406642.
- ↑ Ortiz L, Angevine M, Kim SK, Watkins D, DeMars R (2000). “T-Cell Epitopes in Variable Segments of Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Elicit Serovar-Specific Immune Responses in Infected Humans”. Infect. Immun. 68 (3): 1719–23. doi:10.1128/IAI.68.3.1719-1723.2000. PMC 97337. PMID 10678996.
- ↑ Paroli E, Franco E (1990). “[Oculogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis]”. Recenti Prog Med. 81 (7–8): 539–48. PMID 2247702.
- ↑ Holstege G, van Ham JJ, Tan J (1986). “Afferent projections to the orbicularis oculi motoneuronal cell group. An autoradiographical tracing study in the cat”. Brain Res. 374 (2): 306–20. PMID 3719340.
- ↑ Feltham N, Fahey D, Knight E (1987). “A growth inhibitory protein secreted by human diploid fibroblasts. Partial purification and characterization”. J Biol Chem. 262 (5): 2176–9. PMID 3818592.
- ↑ Peipert JF (2003). “Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections”. N Engl J Med. 349 (25): 2424–30. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp030542. PMID 14681509.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 “Public Health Image Library (PHIL)”.
Further reading
Bellaminutti, Serena; Seracini, Silva; De Seta, Francesco; Gheit, Tarik; Tommasino, Massimo; Comar, Manola (November 2014). “HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis Co-Detection in Young Asymptomatic Women from High Incidence Area for Cervical Cancer”. Journal of Medical Virology. 86 (11): 1920–1925. doi:10.1002/jmv.24041. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
External links
- Chlamydiae.com
- Template:GPnotebook
- “Chlamydia trachomatis“. NCBI Taxonomy Browser. 813.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) may be classified into three stages: primary LGV characterized by a self-limited papule, secondary LGV characterized by painful lymphadenopathy, and tertiary LGV (genitoanorectal syndrome) characterized by proctocolitis.
Classification
Clincal features of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) occur in three stages.
First Stage (Primary LGV)
Second Stage (Secondary LGV)
- Characterized by painful lymphadenopathy
- Lymphodenopathy most commonly involves inguinal lymph nodes
- Lymphadenopathy may present as fluctuant buboes or abscesses[2]
Third Stage (Tertiary LGV)
- Termed genitoanorectal syndrome
- Characterized by proctocolitis[3]
References
- ↑ Mabey D, Peeling RW (2002). “Lymphogranuloma venereum”. Sex Transm Infect. 78 (2): 90–2. PMC 1744436. PMID 12081191.
- ↑ Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
- ↑ Pinsk I, Saloojee N, Friedlich M (2007). “Lymphogranuloma venereum as a cause of rectal stricture”. Can J Surg. 50 (6): E31–2. PMC 2386211. PMID 18067700.
Differentiating Lymphogranuloma venereum from other Diseases
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause genital ulcers, lymphadenopathy, or proctocolitis including syphilis, Herpes simplex, Behçet’s disease, chancroid, donovanosis, fixed drug eruption, psoriasis, chlamydial diseases caused by C. trachomatis serovars D-K, and diseases characterized with colitis. Sexually transmitted diseases characterized as genital ulcer diseases will present with the most similar symptoms to LGV.
Differentiating Lymphogranuloma Venereum from Other Diseases
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause genital ulcers, lymphadenopathy, or proctocolitis including:[1]
- Syphilis
- Herpes simplex
- Behçet’s disease
- Chancroid
- Donovanosis
- Fixed drug eruption
- Psoriasis
- Chlamydial diseases caused by C. trachomatis serovars D-K
- Diseases characterized with colitis
Sexually transmitted diseases characterized as genital ulcer diseases may present with similar manifestations and lesion characteristics. A diagnosis based only on the patient’s medical history and physical examination frequently is inaccurate. Patients who have genital, anal, or perianal ulcers should be evaluated with laboratory tests to make a definitive diagnosis.[2]
| Clinical Characteristic | Sexually Transmitted Disease | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chancroid | Genital Herpes | Donovanosis | LGV | Syphilis | |
| Cause | Haemophilus ducreyi | Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV-1 & HSV-2) | Klebsiella granulomatis | Chlamydia trachomatis serovars L1, L2, or L3 | Treponema pallidum |
| Lesion Type | Papule evolving to ulcer | Vesicle evolving to ulcer | Ulcer progressing to granuloma | Self-limited papule or ulcer | Papule evolving to ulcer |
| Lesion Border | Crater with irregular, sharp margins | Circular, sharp margins on erythematous base | Friable base with sharp, raised, rolled margin | Shallow, smooth border | Crater with raised edges, smooth margins |
| Lesion Distribution | Single or multiple | Multiple, in group/crop | Single or multiple | Single or herpetiform | Multiple |
| Lesion Texture | Soft | Umbilicated | Granulomatous | Firm bump | Indurated |
| Lesion Tenderness | Present | Present | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Lesion Exudate | Grey/yellow purulent exudate | Non-exudative | Non-exudative but bleeds easily | Non-exudative | Non-exudative; non-fluctuant |
| Lymphadenopathy | Present and tender in approx. half of patients (typically unilateral) | Present and tender | Absent from primary infection; pseudobuboes may occur | Present and tender | Present and non-tender (uni- or bilateral) |
References
- ↑ Mabey D, Peeling RW (2002). “Lymphogranuloma venereum”. Sex Transm Infect. 78 (2): 90–2. PMC 1744436. PMID 12081191.
- ↑ 2015 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (June 4, 2015). http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/genital-ulcers.htm Accessed February 18, 2016.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) is rare in developed countries but the disease has become prevalent in the men who have sex with men (MSM) population. Outbreaks in MSM have occurred in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany and United States. LGV is seen most commonly in white individuals whose ages range from 15 to 40 years. Males typically present and earlier stages than females.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence
- True incidence is unknown in the United States since national reporting of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) ended in 1995.
- Between 2003 and 2012, approximately 2,000 cases of LGV were reported in the United Kingdom.[1]
Age
- LGV is seen in sexually active individuals, ranging from ages 15 to 40 years.
Gender
- LGV affects both sexes equally.
- Males typically present at earlier stages and females at later stages.
- LGV is commonly seen in men who have sex with men (MSM) presenting as proctitis.[2]
Race
- Although race is not a risk factor, most cases of LGV are among Caucasians.
Developed Countries
- LGV is uncommon in developed countries but outbreaks have occurred since 2003 among the MSM population in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany and United States.[3][4]
Developing Countries
- LGV is endemic to tropical regions of the world, including the Caribbean, Africa, and Southeast Asia.[5]
References
- ↑ de Vries, Henry J.C.; van der Bij, Akke K.; Fennema, Johan S.A.; Smit, Colette; de Wolf, Frank; Prins, Maria; Coutinho, Roel A.; MorrÉ, Servaas A. (2008). “Lymphogranuloma Venereum Proctitis in Men Who Have Sex With Men Is Associated With Anal Enema Use and High-Risk Behavior”. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 35 (2): 203–208. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815abb08. ISSN 0148-5717.
- ↑ Ward H, Alexander S, Carder C, Dean G, French P, Ivens D; et al. (2009). “The prevalence of lymphogranuloma venereum infection in men who have sex with men: results of a multicentre case finding study”. Sex Transm Infect. 85 (3): 173–5. doi:10.1136/sti.2008.035311. PMC 2683989. PMID 19221105.
- ↑ Kapoor, S (2008). “Re-emergence of lymphogranuloma venereum”. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 22 (4): 409–416. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02573.x. ISSN 0926-9959.
- ↑ Ward, Helen; Martin, Iona; Macdonald, Neil; Alexander, Sarah; Simms, Ian; Fenton, Kevin; French, Patrick; Dean, Gillian; Ison, Catherine (2007). “Lymphogranuloma Venereum in the United Kingdom”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 44 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1086/509922. ISSN 1058-4838.
- ↑ Mabey D, Peeling RW (2002). “Lymphogranuloma venereum”. Sex Transm Infect. 78 (2): 90–2. PMC 1744436. PMID 12081191.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
Risk factors for developing lymphogranuloma venereum include HIV-positive serostatus, unprotected sexual intercourse (anal intercourse higher risk than vaginal intercourse) and multiple sex partners.
Risk Factors
- Unprotected anal intercourse is a greater risk factor than unprotected vaginal intercourse
- Multiple sex partners[2]
References
- ↑ Ward H, Martin I, Macdonald N, Alexander S, Simms I, Fenton K; et al. (2007). “Lymphogranuloma venereum in the United kingdom”. Clin Infect Dis. 44 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1086/509922. PMID 17143811.
- ↑ Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A.
Overview
After an incubation period of 3 – 30 days for Chlamydia trachomatis, a papule develops at the point of inoculation and may ulcerate. The lesion is self-limited and heals in approximately a week. Lymphadenopathy of the inguinal and femoral lymph nodes develops 2 – 6 weeks after onset the primary lesion. Inguinal lymph nodes may develop into fluctuant, suppurative buboes or nonsuppurative abscesses. Iliac and perirectal lymphadenopathy may also develop in patients with rectal exposure, accompanied by hemorrhagic proctocolitis. Chronic inflammation may lead to perirectal fistulas and/or strictures, as well as sclerosing fibrosis that results in elephantiasis of genitalia, esthiomene in women, and frozen pelvis syndrome. Systemic spread may result in arthritis, hepatitis or perihepatitis, pneumonitis, cardiac involvment (rare), aseptic meningitis (rare), ocular inflammatory disease (rare). Prognosis is poor without treatment. However, spontaneous remission is possible. Death can occur from bowel obstruction or perforation.
Natural History
Primary Stage
- Incubation period of Chlamydia trachomatis is approximately 3 to 30 days, after which a papule develops at the point of inoculation.
- The papule may ulcerate.
- The lesion is self-limited and heals in approximately 1 week.
- Individuals with rectal exposure may develop proctitis.[1][2]
Secondary Stage
- Lymphadenopathy develops approximately 2 to 6 weeks after onset of the primary lesion.
- If the site of inoculation is on the anterior area of genitalia, patients most commonly develop inguinal and/ or femoral lymphadenitis.[2]
- Inflammation is more common in men and occurs in approximately 20% of women.
- Lymphadenopathy is unilateral is two-thirds of patients.
- Lymph nodes may develop into fluctuant, suppurative buboes or nonsuppurative abscesses
- Approximately 20% of patients develop “Groove sign” (separation of the inguinal and femoral lymph nodes by the inguinal ligament).[3]
- If site of inoculation is the posterior area of genitalia or anorectal area, patients commonly develop anorectal syndrome.[1]
- Patients may develop lymphadenopathy of the iliac or perirectal nodes.
- Patients may develop hemorrhagic proctocolitis.
Tertiary Stage
- Chronic proctocolitis may lead to the formation of perirectal fistulas, strictures, and rectal stenosis.[4]
- Chronic lymphadenopathy may cause sclerosing fibrosis that results in elephantiasis of genitalia, esthiomene in women, and frozen pelvis syndrome.[1]
Complications
- Strictures and/or fistulas that cause rectal stenosis[5]
- Fibrosis causing genital elephantiasis or esthiomene
- Follicular conjunctivitis due to autoinoculation of infectious discharge
- Systemic spread may result in the following:[1]
- Arthritis
- Hepatitis or perihepatitis
- Pneumonitis
- Cardiac involvment (rare)
- Aseptic meningitis (rare)
- Ocular inflammatory disease (rare)
Prognosis
- Prognosis is usually poor without treatment. However, spontaneous remission is common.
- Complete cure can be obtained with proper antibiotic treatment (more favorable with early treatment).
- Death can occur from bowel obstruction or perforation.[6]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Ceovic R, Gulin SJ (2015). “Lymphogranuloma venereum: diagnostic and treatment challenges”. Infect Drug Resist. 8: 39–47. doi:10.2147/IDR.S57540. PMC 4381887. PMID 25870512.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mabey, D (2002). “Lymphogranuloma venereum”. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 78 (2): 90–92. doi:10.1136/sti.78.2.90. ISSN 1368-4973.
- ↑ Roest RW, van der Meijden WI, European Branch of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infection and the European Office of the World Health Organization (2001). “European guideline for the management of tropical genito-ulcerative diseases”. Int J STD AIDS. 12 Suppl 3: 78–83. PMID 11589803.
- ↑ de Vries HJ, Zingoni A, White JA, Ross JD, Kreuter A (2013). “2013 European Guideline on the management of proctitis, proctocolitis and enteritis caused by sexually transmissible pathogens”. Int J STD AIDS. 25 (7): 465–474. doi:10.1177/0956462413516100. PMID 24352129.
- ↑ Papagrigoriadis S, Rennie JA (1998). “Lymphogranuloma venereum as a cause of rectal strictures”. Postgrad Med J. 74 (869): 168–9. PMC 2360843. PMID 9640444.
- ↑ Lymphogranuloma venereum. Wikipedia (December 3, 2015). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymphogranuloma_venereum Accessed February 23, 2016.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH

![Photomicrograph of Chlamydia trachomatis taken from a urethral scrape. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/2/21/Chlamydia15.jpeg)
![McCoy cell monolayers with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion bodies (200X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/8/88/Chlamydia11.jpeg)
![McCoy cell monolayers with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion bodies (50X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/e/e2/Chlamydia10.jpeg)
![Photomicrograph depicts HeLa cells infected with Type-A Chlamydia trachomatis (400X mag). From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/2/29/Chlamydia09.jpeg)
![Patient’s left eye with the upper lid retracted in order to reveal the inflamed conjunctival membrane lining the inside of both the upper and lower lids, due to what was determined to be a case of inclusion conjunctivitis caused by the bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/3/3c/Chlamydia03.jpeg)
![From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). [13]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/0/01/Chlamydia04.jpeg)