Meningioma
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2]Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Synonyms and keywords: Meningioma, Arachnoidal fibroblastoma, Dural endothelioma, Leptomeningioma, Meningeal fibroblastoma
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
Meningioma is a relatively common neoplasm of the central nervous system that arises from arachnoidal cells which are normally involved in the protection of the brain and spinal cord by forming a thick envelope of meninges around them. Meningioma is the most common benign tumors of the brain. About 90% of meningiomas are benign with about 2% being malignant. Meningioma was first discovered by Dr Felix Platter, a Swiss physician, in the 16th century. Meningioma may be classified according to the histological criteria of the WHO. It is classified into 3 groups: benign classic meningioma (WHO grade 1), atypical meningioma (WHO grade 2), and anaplastic malignant meningioma (WHO grade 3). Neurofibromatosis type II, cowden syndrome, and multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 are among a few conditions that are associated with meningioma. There are no established direct causes for meningioma. Meningioma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause similar presentation such as schwannoma, hemangiopericytoma, and solitary fibrous tumor. The incidence of meningioma is approximately 7.62 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The prevalence of meningioma was estimated to be 97.5 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Common risk factors in the development of meningioma are history of radiation treatment, increasing age, and female gender. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for meningioma. Meningioma could present with complications such as peritumoral brain edema, stroke, and increased intracranial pressure. The hallmark symptom of meningioma is headache. Other common symptoms of meningioma include visual impairment, hearing loss/tinnitus, focal neurological deficits, behavioral changes. Head CT scan may be diagnostic of meningioma. Some of the findings on CT scan suggestive of meningioma include edema, CSF attenuation cleft, round/elongated extraaxial mass, and hyperostosis of the adjacent skull. MRI with gadolinium is the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of meningioma. On MRI, meningioma is characterized by a homogeneous, well circumscribed, and extra-axial mass with a broad dural base. Other findings on MRI suggestive of meningioma include CSF vascular cleft sign, dural tail sign, and central necrosis or calcification that do not enhance. In asymptomatic meningiomas, the decision of surgical resection must be weighed against the possibility of conservative management according to the patient’s age, clinical presentation, and the anatomical location of the tumor. The predominant therapy for meningioma is surgical resection. Current data suggest that both external beam radiotherapy and radiosurgery play an important role in the management of grade II and III meningiomas.
Historical Perspective
Meningioma was first discovered by Dr Felix Platter, a Swiss physician, in the 16th century. He described the tumor as having the shape of an acorn, fleshy, and full of holes.
Classification
Meningioma may be classified according to the histological criteria of the WHO into 3 groups: benign classic meningioma (WHO grade 1) which is made up of nine variants, atypical meningioma (WHO grade 2) which is made up of three, and anaplastic malignant meningioma (WHO grade 3) made up of three variants.
Pathophysiology
Meningioma arises from the arachnoid “cap” cells, which are normally involved in the protection of the central nervous system by forming a thick envelope of meninges around the brain and spinal cord. Because of the abundance of arachnoid cap cells in the skull base and perivenous sinuses, meningiomas are commonly found in these sites. Some meningiomas may have progesterone receptors which could make the tumor grow in size during pregnancy and in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Meningiomas could be found in various locations such as sphenoid ridge, olfactory grove, falx cerebri, cerebellopontine angle, foramen magnum, ventricles, etc. Though most meningiomas are benign in nature, some may be malignant and this characterization is usually based on brain invasion, frank anaplasia, and distant metastasis. NF2, MEG2, TERT, AKT1, and NDRG2 are some of the genes that may be involved in the pathogenesis of meningioma. Some conditions could be associated with meningioma, they include neurofibromatosis type 2, cowden syndrome, nevoid basal cell carcinoma, multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1), etc. On gross pathology, a gray, well-circumscribed, dome-shaped mass is a characteristic finding of meningioma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, meningiomas may have different characeteristics, they include mitotic figures, interdigitating processes and intercellular junctions, prominent nucleoli, necrosis, and increased cellularity.
Causes
There are no established direct causes for meningioma.
Differentiating Meningioma from other Diseases
Meningioma must be differentiated from other diseases that have similar presentation such as schwannoma, oligodendroglioma, pituitary adenoma, hemangioblastoma, etc
Epidemiology and Demographics
The prevalence of meningioma was estimated to be 97.5 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The incidence of meningioma is approximately 7.62 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Meningiomas may appear at any age, but occur most commonly among patients between 40 to 60 years. Females are more commonly affected with meningiomas than males, with the ratio being 2:1. Meningioma usually affects individuals of the African American race. Caucasian and Latin American individuals are less likely to develop meningioma.
Risk Factors
Common risk factors in the development of meningioma are history of radiation treatment, increasing age, and female gender.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for meningioma.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
The median age at diagnosis of meningioma is about 65 years, with incidence increasing with advancing age. A higher annual growth rate may be seen in patients with an initial tumor diameter of greater than 25mm, MR imaging T2 signal hyperintensity, patients presenting with symptoms and edema, and male patients. Most meningiomas are single with about 1-10% being multiple. Common complications of meningioma include increased intracranial pressure, cranial nerve palsies, and hydrocephalus. Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with meningioma mainly depends on the histological grade of the tumor and the extent of resection during surgery. A poorer survival rate may be seen in patients of advanced age, male patients, black race, malignant tumors, and patients with no initial treatment.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
MRI is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of meningioma but CT is more widely available and better in urgent settings.
History and Symptoms
The hallmark symptom of meningioma is headache. Other common symptoms of meningioma include weakness, focal neurological deficits, visual impairement, hearing loss, and confusion. However, the specific clinical presentation of meningioma is determined by the exact anatomical location of the tumor.
Physical Examination
Common physical examination findings of meningioma include decreased visual acuity, hearing loss, ataxia, muscle weakness, focal neurological deficits, and more. Patients with meningioma present with different signs depending on the location of the tumor, its character, and the structures it may compress. Some patients are asymptomatic and may have not present with sign on physical examination.
Laboratory Findings
There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with meningioma.
Electrocardiogram
There are no ECG findings associated with meningioma.
X Ray
Plain radiography no longer has a role in the diagnosis or management of meningioma.
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
There are no echocardiography/ultrasound findings associated with meningioma.
CT
Head CT scan may be diagnostic of meningioma. Some of the findings on CT scan suggestive of meningioma include edema, CSF attenuation cleft, round/elongated extraaxial mass, and hyperostosis of the adjacent skull. Although MRI is the diagnostic study of choice, CT is easier to use and may be used in cases where there is a contraindication to the use of an MRI.
MRI
MRI with gadolinium is the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of meningioma. On MRI, meningioma is characterized by a homogeneous, well circumscribed, and extra-axial mass with a broad dural base. Other findings on MRI suggestive of meningioma include CSF vascular cleft sign, dural tail sign, and central necrosis or calcification that do not enhance. Meningiomas may appear different on T1 and T2-weighted sequence but with a few similarities.
Other Imaging Findings
Other imaging studies that may be helpful in the diagnosis of meningioma include magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy, perfusion MRI, and diffusion MRI. With MR spectroscopy, elevated levels of alanine, choline, and/or lactate could be seen. MR perfusion study could demonstrate an elevated value of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV).
Other Diagnostic Studies
Bromodeoxyuridine labeling study may be helpful in the diagnosis of meningioma. An elevated bromodeoxyuridine labeling index is suggestive of a rapid growth rate of meningioma and a greater incidence of recurrence following surgical resection.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
In asymptomatic meningiomas, the decision of surgical resection must be weighed against the possibility of conservative management according to the patient’s age, clinical presentation, and the anatomical location of the tumor.[1][2] Current data suggest that both external beam radiotherapy and radiosurgery play an important role in the management of grade II and III meningiomas.[3][4] Chemotherapeutic agents are generally not effective against meningioma.[2]
Interventions
Asymptomatic meningiomas found incidentally are usually treated expectantly. In cases with tissue edema and vascular compromise, another approach can be taken. Radiotherapy is pursued depending on the patient factor and location of the tumor. It can be done after surgery with little advantage over radiotherapy alone.
Surgery
The predominant therapy for meningioma is surgical resection. Adjunctive radiation therapy may be required among certain patients.[2] The Simpson criteria for meningioma correlates the degree of surgical resection completeness with the probability of post-surgical tumor recurrence.[2][5][6] Surgical resection is not recommended among patients with asymptomatic stable meningioma.[2]
Primary Prevention
There are no established measures for the primary prevention of meningioma.
Secondary Prevention
There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of meningioma.
References
- ↑ Herscovici Z, Rappaport Z, Sulkes J, Danaila L, Rubin G (2004). “Natural history of conservatively treated meningiomas”. Neurology. 63 (6): 1133–4. PMID 15452322.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Meningioma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meningioma Accessed on September, 25 2015
- ↑ Maclean J, Fersht N, Short S (2014). “Controversies in radiotherapy for meningioma”. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 26 (1): 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2013.10.001. PMID 24207113.
- ↑ Ding D, Starke RM, Hantzmon J, Yen CP, Williams BJ, Sheehan JP (2013). “The role of radiosurgery in the management of WHO Grade II and III intracranial meningiomas”. Neurosurg Focus. 35 (6): E16. doi:10.3171/2013.9.FOCUS13364. PMID 24289124.
- ↑ Simpson grade. Radiopaedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/simpson-grade Accessed on September, 25 2015
- ↑ Simpson Grading System. Neurosurgic.com(2015) http://www.neurosurgic.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=846:simpson-grading-system-for-removal-of-meningeomas&catid=152:usefulinfo&Itemid=603 Accessed on September, 25 2015
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
Meningioma was first discovered by Dr. Felix Platter, a Swiss physician, in the 16th century. He described it as being round, fleshy and full of holes. Dr. Antonie Louis is known to be the first to attempt naming a meningioma.
Historical Perspective
- In 1614, the first case of meningioma was described by Dr. Felix Platter.[1]
- He described the tumor as being round with a shape like an acorn. He said it was as large as a medium-sized apple, fleshy, and full of holes.
- The tumor had no connection with the brain matters, was covered with its own membrane, and a cavity was left behind after its removal.
- In 1774, Antonie Louis was acknowledged to have had the first major attempt at naming meningioma with his scientific treatise devoted to meningioma: “Sur les tumeurs fongueuses de la dure-mère” meaning “fungoid tumors of the dura mater” when translated to English.
- This was published in the Memoires of the ARC (académie royale de chirurgie).[2]
- In 1910, a very large meningioma was successfully removed from the brain of General Leonard Wood by Dr. Harvey Cushing.
- General Leonard Wood was a physician and also the Chief of Staff of the US Army.[3]
References
- ↑ Bir SC, Maiti TK, Bollam P, Nanda A (2015). “Felix Platter and a historical perspective of the meningioma”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 134: 75–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.02.018. PMID 25965286.
- ↑ Barthélemy, Ernest Joseph; Sarkiss, Christopher A.; Lee, James; Shrivastava, Raj K. (2016). “The historical origin of the term “meningioma” and the rise of nationalistic neurosurgery”. Journal of Neurosurgery. 125 (5): 1283–1290. doi:10.3171/2015.10.JNS15877. ISSN 0022-3085.
- ↑ Ravin, James G. (2012). “The Magician With a Meningioma”. Archives of Ophthalmology. 130 (10): 1317. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1914. ISSN 0003-9950.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
Meningioma has been classified into 3 groups by the WHO: benign classic meningioma (WHO grade 1), atypical meningioma (WHO grade 2), and anaplastic malignant meningioma (WHO grade 3). The WHO grade 1 group grow very slowly and consists of about 9 variants. About 3 variants correspond to WHO grade II, their association with malignancy is not clear but they grow faster than benign meningiomas. About 2 variants correspond to WHO grade III.
Classification
- WHO has classified meningiomas into histological and cytomorphological variants. Nine variants correspond to WHO grade I which are the benign classic meningiomas, three correspond to WHO grade II which are atypical meningiomas, and three in WHO grade III and are anaplastic malignant meningiomas.[1]
| WHO Grade | Subtypes |
|---|---|
|
Benign classic meningioma |
|
|
Atypical meningioma |
|
|
Anaplastic malignant meningioma |
|
Gallery




References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Harter, Patrick N.; Braun, Yannick; Plate, Karl H. (2017). “Classification of meningiomas—advances and controversies”. Chinese Clinical Oncology. 6 (S1): S2–S2. doi:10.21037/cco.2017.05.02. ISSN 2304-3865.
- ↑ Commins, Deborah L.; Atkinson, Roscoe D.; Burnett, Margaret E. (2007). “Review of meningioma histopathology”. Neurosurgical Focus. 23 (4): E3. doi:10.3171/FOC-07/10/E3. ISSN 1092-0684.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
Meningioma arises from the arachnoid “cap” cells, which are normally involved in the protection of the central nervous system by forming a thick envelope of meninges around the brain and spinal cord. The majority of meningiomas are benign. They can be found anywhere in the central nervous system but are most commonly seen in the parasagittal, convexity and turbeculum sellae areas. There may be genetic mutations involved in the development of a meningioma, some of the genes involved includes NF2, MEG3, NDRG2, and SMARCE1. Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1, cowden syndrome, werner syndrome and neurofibromatosis 2 are some of the conditions that may be associated with meningioma. On microscopic pathology, some of the characteristic findings of a meningioma include mitotic figures, necrosis, interdigitating processes, and brain invasion. Most meningiomas are positive for vimentin and negative for cytokeratin.
Pathogenesis
- Meningiomas are the most common benign tumors of the brain. They are also the most common nonglial brain tumors.[1]
- Meningioma arises from the arachnoid “cap” cells, which are normally involved in the protection of the central nervous system by forming a thick envelope of meninges around the brain and spinal cord.[2]
- Meningiomas are commonly found in the base of the skull and perivenous sinuses due to the abundance of arachnoid cap cells in these sites. They are usually non-infilterative.[1]
- The majority of meningiomas are benign (90%), about 6% are atypical, and 2% are malignant.[1]
- Some meningiomas may be positive for progesterone receptors on histological examination. This can lead to increased tumor size and symptom burden during pregnancy and the luteal phase of the menstural cycle.[1]
- Meningiomas may possess receptors for platelet derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucocorticoid, and epidermal growth factor.[1]
- Meningiomas can be found anywhere in the central nervous system, with its most frequent distribution as follows: parasagittal (20.8%), then convexity (15.2%), and tuberculum sellae (12.8%).[3]
- The symptoms of meningioma can be flared by water retention, engorgement of blood vessels, and the presence of sex hormone receptors on tumor cells.[1]
- A meningioma can be localized in the following areas: sphenoid ridge, olfactory groove, falx, lateral ventriculi, tentorium, the middle fossa, the orbit, the spinal channel, the Sylvian fissure, extracalvarial, multiple localization, the pontocerebral angle, the sphenoidal plane, and the foramen magnum.[3]
- The characteristics of a meningioma can be determined based on histopathological variables like tumor gradient, histological subtype, proliferative index, and invasiveness of a tumor to the brain.[3]
- The characterization of a meningioma being malignant is based on one or more of the following criteria: brain invasion, frank anaplasia, and distant metastasis[4]
Genetics
Genes involved in the pathogenesis of meningioma include:[5][4][6][7][8][9][10][11]
- Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) gene on chromosome 22
- MEG3 (maternally expressed gene 3): Loss of expression, genomic DNA deletion, and promoter methylation on chromosome 14q32.
- NDRG2 (N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2): Down regulation of this gene expression at the mRNA level is associated with the malignant progression and predisposition to recurrence of meningiomas.
- SMARCE1 (SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex subunit gene): Heterozygous loss-of-function mutation. Its is commonly seen in meningiomas with clear cell histology and those located in the spine.
- SMARCB1: Predisposes to multiple meningiomas preferentially in the falx cerebri.
- TERT promoter mutation: Seen in meningiomas undergoing malignant histological progression.
- TRAF7
- AKT1
- KLF4
- SMO
- PIK3CA
Associated Conditions
Conditions associated with meningioma include:[12]
- Neurofibromatosis type 2
- Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1)
- Cowden syndrome
- Werner syndrome
- BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome
- Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome
- Familial meningiomatosis
Gross Pathology
- On gross pathology, a gray, well-circumscribed, dome-shaped mass is a characteristic finding of meningioma.[13]

Microscopic Pathology
- Interdigitating processes and intercellular junctions
- Small foci of necrosis surrounded by pseudopalisading tumor cells in nonembolized atypical meningiomas
- Necrosis occurring in large geographic areas with a quick line demarcating it from viable tissues in embolized menigiomas
- Prominent macronucleoli in the perinecrotic areas in embolized meningiomas
- Mitotic figures (low in benign cases and high in malignant and atypical cases)
- Brain invasion histologically seen as a finger-like, a tongue-like, or a knobby protrusion into the tissue
- Small cells with a high nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio
- Prominent nucleoli
- Uninterrupted patternless or sheet-like growth
- Increased cellularity
- The following immunohistochemistry profile can be used to support the diagnosis of meningioma:[4]
- Positive for vimentin
- Negative for cytokeratin
- Weak or negative staining for S 100 protein
- Focal membranous positivity for EMA



References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Gurcay AG, Bozkurt I, Senturk S, Kazanci A, Gurcan O, Turkoglu OF; et al. (2018). “Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management Strategy of Meningioma during Pregnancy”. Asian J Neurosurg. 13 (1): 86–89. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.181115. PMC 5820904. PMID 29492130.
- ↑ Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB (2010) Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99 (3):307-14. DOI:10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3 PMID: 20821343
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Sumkovski R, Micunovic M, Kocevski I, Ilievski B, Petrov I (2019). “Surgical Treatment of Meningiomas – Outcome Associated With Type of Resection, Recurrence, Karnofsky Performance Score, Mitotic Count”. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 7 (1): 56–64. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.503. PMC 6352459. PMID 30740161.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Commins, Deborah L.; Atkinson, Roscoe D.; Burnett, Margaret E. (2007). “Review of meningioma histopathology”. Neurosurgical Focus. 23 (4): E3. doi:10.3171/FOC-07/10/E3. ISSN 1092-0684.
- ↑ Yuzawa S, Nishihara H, Tanaka S (2016). “Genetic landscape of meningioma”. Brain Tumor Pathol. 33 (4): 237–247. doi:10.1007/s10014-016-0271-7. PMID 27624470.
- ↑ Balik V, Srovnal J, Sulla I, Kalita O, Foltanova T, Vaverka M; et al. (2013). “MEG3: a novel long noncoding potentially tumour-suppressing RNA in meningiomas”. J Neurooncol. 112 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11060-012-1038-6. PMID 23307326.
- ↑ Lusis EA, Watson MA, Chicoine MR, Lyman M, Roerig P, Reifenberger G; et al. (2005). “Integrative genomic analysis identifies NDRG2 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene frequently inactivated in clinically aggressive meningioma”. Cancer Res. 65 (16): 7121–6. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0043. PMID 16103061.
- ↑ Skiriute D, Tamasauskas S, Asmoniene V, Saferis V, Skauminas K, Deltuva V; et al. (2011). “Tumor grade-related NDRG2 gene expression in primary and recurrent intracranial meningiomas”. J Neurooncol. 102 (1): 89–94. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0291-9. PMID 20607352.
- ↑ Smith MJ, O’Sullivan J, Bhaskar SS, Hadfield KD, Poke G, Caird J; et al. (2013). “Loss-of-function mutations in SMARCE1 cause an inherited disorder of multiple spinal meningiomas”. Nat Genet. 45 (3): 295–8. doi:10.1038/ng.2552. PMID 23377182.
- ↑ van den Munckhof P, Christiaans I, Kenter SB, Baas F, Hulsebos TJ (2012). “Germline SMARCB1 mutation predisposes to multiple meningiomas and schwannomas with preferential location of cranial meningiomas at the falx cerebri”. Neurogenetics. 13 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1007/s10048-011-0300-y. PMID 22038540.
- ↑ Goutagny S, Nault JC, Mallet M, Henin D, Rossi JZ, Kalamarides M (2014). “High incidence of activating TERT promoter mutations in meningiomas undergoing malignant progression”. Brain Pathol. 24 (2): 184–9. doi:10.1111/bpa.12110. PMID 24261697.
- ↑ Kerr K, Qualmann K, Esquenazi Y, Hagan J, Kim DH (2018). “Familial Syndromes Involving Meningiomas Provide Mechanistic Insight Into Sporadic Disease”. Neurosurgery. 83 (6): 1107–1118. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy121. PMC 6235681. PMID 29660026.
- ↑ Meningioma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meningioma#cite_note-pmid7731706-9 Accessed on September, 25 2015
- ↑ Shibuya M (2015). “Pathology and molecular genetics of meningioma: recent advances”. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 55 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0233. PMC 4533397. PMID 25744347.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
There are no established direct causes for meningioma.
Causes
There are no established direct causes for meningioma.
References
Differentiating Meningioma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahimeh Shojaei, M.D.
Overview
On the basis of seizure, visual disturbance, and constitutional symptoms, meningioma must be differentiated from oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma, hemangioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, schwannoma, primary CNS lymphoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pinealoma, AV malformation, brain aneurysm, bacterial brain abscess, tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, hydatid cyst, CNS cryptococcosis, CNS aspergillosis, and brain metastasis.
Differentiating Meningioma from Other Diseases
Differentiating Meningioma from Other Diseases on the Basis of Seizure, Visual disturbance, and Constitutional Symptoms
On the basis of seizure, visual disturbance, and constitutional symptoms, meningioma must be differentiated from oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma, hemangioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, schwannoma, primary CNS lymphoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pinealoma, AV malformation, brain aneurysm, bacterial brain abscess, tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, hydatid cyst, CNS cryptococcosis, CNS aspergillosis, and brain metastasis.
| Diseases | Clinical manifestations | Para-clinical findings | Gold standard |
Additional findings | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | Physical examination | |||||||||
| Lab Findings | MRI | Immunohistopathology | ||||||||
| Head- ache |
Seizure | Visual disturbance | Constitutional | Focal neurological deficit | ||||||
| Adult primary brain tumors | ||||||||||
| Meningioma [1][2][3] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Glioblastoma multiforme [4][5][6] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Oligodendroglioma [7][8][9] |
+ | + | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Hemangioblastoma [10][11][12][13] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
| ||
| Pituitary adenoma [14][15][6] |
− | − | + Bitemporal hemianopia | − | − |
|
|
|
| |
| Schwannoma [16][17][18][19] |
− | − | − | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Primary CNS lymphoma [20][21] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Childhood primary brain tumors | ||||||||||
| Pilocytic astrocytoma [22][23][24] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Medulloblastoma [25][26][27] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Ependymoma [28][6] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + | − |
|
|
| |
| Craniopharyngioma [29][30][31][6] |
+ | +/− | + Bitemporal hemianopia | − | + |
|
|
|
| |
| Pinealoma [32][33][34] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + vertical gaze palsy |
|
|
|
| |
| Vascular | ||||||||||
| AV malformation [35][36][6] |
+ | + | +/− | − | +/− | − |
|
| ||
| Brain aneurysm [37][38][39][40][41] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | +/− | − |
|
|
|
|
| Infectious | ||||||||||
| Bacterial brain abscess [42][43] |
+ | +/− | +/− | + | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tuberculosis [44][6][45] |
+ | +/− | +/− | + | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| Toxoplasmosis [46][47] |
+ | +/− | +/− | − | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydatid cyst [48][6] |
+ | +/− | +/− | +/− | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| CNS cryptococcosis [49] |
+ | +/− | +/− | + | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| CNS aspergillosis [50] |
+ | +/− | +/− | + | + |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | ||||||||||
| Brain metastasis [51][6] |
+ | +/− | +/− | + | + | − |
|
|
|
|
ABBREVIATIONS
CNS=Central nervous system, AV=Arteriovenous, CSF=Cerebrospinal fluid, NF-2=Neurofibromatosis type 2, MEN-1=Multiple endocrine neoplasia, GFAP=Glial fibrillary acidic protein, HIV=Human immunodeficiency virus, BhCG=Human chorionic gonadotropin, ESR=Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, AFB=Acid fast bacilli, MRA=Magnetic resonance angiography, CTA=CT angiography
References
- ↑ Zee CS, Chin T, Segall HD, Destian S, Ahmadi J (June 1992). “Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas”. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 13 (3): 154–69. PMID 1642904.
- ↑ Shibuya M (2015). “Pathology and molecular genetics of meningioma: recent advances”. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 55 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0233. PMID 25744347.
- ↑ Begnami MD, Palau M, Rushing EJ, Santi M, Quezado M (September 2007). “Evaluation of NF2 gene deletion in sporadic schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas by chromogenic in situ hybridization”. Hum. Pathol. 38 (9): 1345–50. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.027. PMC 2094208. PMID 17509660.
- ↑ Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
- ↑ Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
- ↑ Smits M (2016). “Imaging of oligodendroglioma”. Br J Radiol. 89 (1060): 20150857. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150857. PMC 4846213. PMID 26849038.
- ↑ Wesseling P, van den Bent M, Perry A (June 2015). “Oligodendroglioma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers”. Acta Neuropathol. 129 (6): 809–27. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1424-1. PMC 4436696. PMID 25943885.
- ↑ Kerkhof M, Benit C, Duran-Pena A, Vecht CJ (2015). “Seizures in oligodendroglial tumors”. CNS Oncol. 4 (5): 347–56. doi:10.2217/cns.15.29. PMC 6082346. PMID 26478444.
- ↑ Lonser RR, Butman JA, Huntoon K, Asthagiri AR, Wu T, Bakhtian KD, Chew EY, Zhuang Z, Linehan WM, Oldfield EH (May 2014). “Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease”. J. Neurosurg. 120 (5): 1055–62. doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131431. PMC 4762041. PMID 24579662.
- ↑ Hussein MR (October 2007). “Central nervous system capillary haemangioblastoma: the pathologist’s viewpoint”. Int J Exp Pathol. 88 (5): 311–24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2007.00535.x. PMC 2517334. PMID 17877533.
- ↑ Lee SR, Sanches J, Mark AS, Dillon WP, Norman D, Newton TH (May 1989). “Posterior fossa hemangioblastomas: MR imaging”. Radiology. 171 (2): 463–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704812. PMID 2704812.
- ↑ Perks WH, Cross JN, Sivapragasam S, Johnson P (March 1976). “Supratentorial haemangioblastoma with polycythaemia”. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 39 (3): 218–20. PMID 945331.
- ↑ Kucharczyk W, Davis DO, Kelly WM, Sze G, Norman D, Newton TH (December 1986). “Pituitary adenomas: high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T”. Radiology. 161 (3): 761–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786729. PMID 3786729.
- ↑ Syro LV, Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Toledo RA, Londoño FJ, Ortiz LD, Rotondo F, Horvath E, Uribe H (2012). “Pituitary tumors in patients with MEN1 syndrome”. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 67 Suppl 1: 43–8. PMC 3328811. PMID 22584705.
- ↑ Donnelly, Martin J.; Daly, Carmel A.; Briggs, Robert J. S. (2007). “MR imaging features of an intracochlear acoustic schwannoma”. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 108 (12). doi:10.1017/S0022215100129056. ISSN 0022-2151.
- ↑ Feany MB, Anthony DC, Fletcher CD (May 1998). “Nerve sheath tumours with hybrid features of neurofibroma and schwannoma: a conceptual challenge”. Histopathology. 32 (5): 405–10. PMID 9639114.
- ↑ Chen H, Xue L, Wang H, Wang Z, Wu H (July 2017). “Differential NF2 Gene Status in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas and its Prognostic Impact on Tumour Growth Patterns”. Sci Rep. 7 (1): 5470. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05769-0. PMID 28710469.
- ↑ Hardell, Lennart; Hansson Mild, Kjell; Sandström, Monica; Carlberg, Michael; Hallquist, Arne; Påhlson, Anneli (2003). “Vestibular Schwannoma, Tinnitus and Cellular Telephones”. Neuroepidemiology. 22 (2): 124–129. doi:10.1159/000068745. ISSN 0251-5350.
- ↑ Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
- ↑ Paulus, Werner (1999). “Classification, Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology of Primary CNS Lymphomas”. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 43 (3): 203–208. doi:10.1023/A:1006242116122. ISSN 0167-594X.
- ↑ Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
- ↑ Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
- ↑ Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
- ↑ Dorwart, R H; Wara, W M; Norman, D; Levin, V A (1981). “Complete myelographic evaluation of spinal metastases from medulloblastoma”. Radiology. 139 (2): 403–408. doi:10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220886. ISSN 0033-8419.
- ↑ Fruehwald-Pallamar, Julia; Puchner, Stefan B.; Rossi, Andrea; Garre, Maria L.; Cama, Armando; Koelblinger, Claus; Osborn, Anne G.; Thurnher, Majda M. (2011). “Magnetic resonance imaging spectrum of medulloblastoma”. Neuroradiology. 53 (6): 387–396. doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0829-8. ISSN 0028-3940.
- ↑ Burger, P. C.; Grahmann, F. C.; Bliestle, A.; Kleihues, P. (1987). “Differentiation in the medulloblastoma”. Acta Neuropathologica. 73 (2): 115–123. doi:10.1007/BF00693776. ISSN 0001-6322.
- ↑ Yuh, E. L.; Barkovich, A. J.; Gupta, N. (2009). “Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT”. Child’s Nervous System. 25 (10): 1203–1213. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0878-7. ISSN 0256-7040.
- ↑ Brunel H, Raybaud C, Peretti-Viton P, Lena G, Girard N, Paz-Paredes A, Levrier O, Farnarier P, Manera L, Choux M (September 2002). “[Craniopharyngioma in children: MRI study of 43 cases]”. Neurochirurgie (in French). 48 (4): 309–18. PMID 12407316.
- ↑ Prabhu, Vikram C.; Brown, Henry G. (2005). “The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas”. Child’s Nervous System. 21 (8–9): 622–627. doi:10.1007/s00381-005-1190-9. ISSN 0256-7040.
- ↑ Kennedy HB, Smith RJ (December 1975). “Eye signs in craniopharyngioma”. Br J Ophthalmol. 59 (12): 689–95. PMC 1017436. PMID 766825.
- ↑ Ahmed SR, Shalet SM, Price DA, Pearson D (September 1983). “Human chorionic gonadotrophin secreting pineal germinoma and precocious puberty”. Arch. Dis. Child. 58 (9): 743–5. PMID 6625640.
- ↑ Sano, Keiji (1976). “Pinealoma in Children”. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1159/000119602. ISSN 1016-2291.
- ↑ Baggenstoss, Archie H. (1939). “PINEALOMAS”. Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry. 41 (6): 1187. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1939.02270180115011. ISSN 0096-6754.
- ↑ Kucharczyk, W; Lemme-Pleghos, L; Uske, A; Brant-Zawadzki, M; Dooms, G; Norman, D (1985). “Intracranial vascular malformations: MR and CT imaging”. Radiology. 156 (2): 383–389. doi:10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011900. ISSN 0033-8419.
- ↑ Fleetwood, Ian G; Steinberg, Gary K (2002). “Arteriovenous malformations”. The Lancet. 359 (9309): 863–873. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ Chapman, Arlene B.; Rubinstein, David; Hughes, Richard; Stears, John C.; Earnest, Michael P.; Johnson, Ann M.; Gabow, Patricia A.; Kaehny, William D. (1992). “Intracranial Aneurysms in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (13): 916–920. doi:10.1056/NEJM199209243271303. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ Castori M, Voermans NC (October 2014). “Neurological manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s): A review”. Iran J Neurol. 13 (4): 190–208. PMC 4300794. PMID 25632331.
- ↑ Schievink, W. I.; Raissi, S. S.; Maya, M. M.; Velebir, A. (2010). “Screening for intracranial aneurysms in patients with bicuspid aortic valve”. Neurology. 74 (18): 1430–1433. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1acf. ISSN 0028-3878.
- ↑ Germain DP (May 2017). “Pseudoxanthoma elasticum”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 12 (1): 85. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0639-8. PMC 5424392. PMID 28486967.
- ↑ Farahmand M, Farahangiz S, Yadollahi M (October 2013). “Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; A Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography”. Bull Emerg Trauma. 1 (4): 147–51. PMC 4789449. PMID 27162847.
- ↑ Haimes, AB; Zimmerman, RD; Morgello, S; Weingarten, K; Becker, RD; Jennis, R; Deck, MD (1989). “MR imaging of brain abscesses”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 152 (5): 1073–1085. doi:10.2214/ajr.152.5.1073. ISSN 0361-803X.
- ↑ Brouwer, Matthijs C.; Tunkel, Allan R.; McKhann, Guy M.; van de Beek, Diederik (2014). “Brain Abscess”. New England Journal of Medicine. 371 (5): 447–456. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1301635. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ Morgado, Carlos; Ruivo, Nuno (2005). “Imaging meningo-encephalic tuberculosis”. European Journal of Radiology. 55 (2): 188–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.017. ISSN 0720-048X.
- ↑ Be NA, Kim KS, Bishai WR, Jain SK (March 2009). “Pathogenesis of central nervous system tuberculosis”. Curr. Mol. Med. 9 (2): 94–9. PMC 4486069. PMID 19275620.
- ↑ Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
- ↑ Helton KJ, Maron G, Mamcarz E, Leventaki V, Patay Z, Sadighi Z (November 2016). “Unusual magnetic resonance imaging presentation of post-BMT cerebral toxoplasmosis masquerading as meningoencephalitis and ventriculitis”. Bone Marrow Transplant. 51 (11): 1533–1536. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.168. PMID 27348541.
- ↑ Taslakian B, Darwish H (September 2016). “Intracranial hydatid cyst: imaging findings of a rare disease”. BMJ Case Rep. 2016. doi:10.1136/bcr-2016-216570. PMC 5030532. PMID 27620198.
- ↑ McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.
- ↑ McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.
- ↑ Pope WB (2018). “Brain metastases: neuroimaging”. Handb Clin Neurol. 149: 89–112. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4. PMC 6118134. PMID 29307364.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
The prevalence of meningioma is estimated to be 97.5 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The incidence of meningioma is approximately 7.62 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Meningiomas may appear at any age, but are most commonly noticed among patients older than 50 years of age. Females are more commonly affected with meningiomas than males, with a ratio of about 2:1. Meningioma usually affects individuals of the African American race. Caucasian and Latin American individuals are less likely to develop meningioma.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Prevalence
- The prevalence of meningioma is estimated to be 97.5 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. There are over 170,000 diagnosed cases in the United States.[1]
- It was the most reported primary brain and central nervous system tumor in the Unites States between 2002 and 2006. It accounted for about 33.8% of the tumors reported, making it the most frequently diagnosed brain tumor.[1]
- Meningioma is the second most common primary brain tumor worldwide.[2]
Incidence
- The incidence of meningiomas annually is approximately 7.62 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The incidence of benign meningiomas is about 7.18, about 0.32 for borderline malignant meningiomas, and about 0.12 for malignant meningiomas.[3]
Age
- Meningiomas can occur at any age but is mostly seen with advancing age. [3]
- It is commonly seen between the ages of 40 to 60 and is more common in postmenopausal women.[4]
- In childhood and adolescence, meningiomas account for about 1.5% of brain tumors.[5]
Gender
- Females are more commonly affected with meningiomas than males.[1]
- The female to male ratio is approximately 2 to 1.
- The incidence of meningioma among females is approximately 8.36 per 100,000 individuals in the United States, with that of males being 3.61 per 100,000 individuals.[1]
- The female to male ratio of meningiomas may be inverted among affected patients who are younger than 15 years of age.[1]
- Atypical and malignant meningiomas have a slight male predominace.[1]
Race
- Meningioma usually affects individuals of the black race. Caucasian and Latin American individuals are less likely to develop meningioma.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB (2010). “Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma”. J Neurooncol. 99 (3): 307–14. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3. PMC 2945461. PMID 20821343.
- ↑ Chamberlain MC, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2011). “Medical treatment of recurrent meningiomas”. Expert Rev Neurother. 11 (10): 1425–32. doi:10.1586/ern.11.38. PMID 21955199.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Dolecek TA, Dressler EV, Thakkar JP, Liu M, Al-Qaisi A, Villano JL (2015). “Epidemiology of meningiomas post-Public Law 107-206: The Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act”. Cancer. 121 (14): 2400–10. doi:10.1002/cncr.29379. PMID 25872752.
- ↑ Gurcay AG, Bozkurt I, Senturk S, Kazanci A, Gurcan O, Turkoglu OF; et al. (2018). “Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management Strategy of Meningioma during Pregnancy”. Asian J Neurosurg. 13 (1): 86–89. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.181115. PMC 5820904. PMID 29492130.
- ↑ Sumkovski R, Micunovic M, Kocevski I, Ilievski B, Petrov I (2019). “Surgical Treatment of Meningiomas – Outcome Associated With Type of Resection, Recurrence, Karnofsky Performance Score, Mitotic Count”. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 7 (1): 56–64. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.503. PMC 6352459. PMID 30740161.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
Common risk factors in the development of meningioma are history of radiation treatment, female gender, hormones, and some genetic disorders.
Risk Factors
- Ionizing radiation: This is seen with both high and low dose levels.
- Hormones: Some meningiomas have receptors for progesterone and estrogen and can increase in size during pregnancy and the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.
- Obesity in women
- Increasing age
- Neurofibromatosis type 2
- Female gender
References
- ↑ Gurcay AG, Bozkurt I, Senturk S, Kazanci A, Gurcan O, Turkoglu OF; et al. (2018). “Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management Strategy of Meningioma during Pregnancy”. Asian J Neurosurg. 13 (1): 86–89. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.181115. PMC 5820904. PMID 29492130.
- ↑ Shao C, Bai LP, Qi ZY, Hui GZ, Wang Z (2014). “Overweight, obesity and meningioma risk: a meta-analysis”. PLoS One. 9 (2): e90167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090167. PMC 3935973. PMID 24587258.
- ↑ Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Kruchko C (2007). “Meningiomas: causes and risk factors”. Neurosurg Focus. 23 (4): E2. doi:10.3171/FOC-07/10/E2. PMID 17961039.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Haytham Allaham, M.D. [2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for meningioma.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for meningioma.
References
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ifeoma Odukwe, M.D. [2] Haytham Allaham, M.D. [3]
Overview
The incidence of meningioma increases with advancing age, with the median age of diagnosis being about 65 years. There are some factors associated with faster progression of the tumor, they include absence of calcification, age 60 or younger, and intial tumor diameter greater than 25mm. Meningiomas can grow in a linear or volumetric fashion. They can grow anywhere in the central nervous system containing arachnoid membrane. If left untreated, patients with meningioma may progress to developing morning headaches, focal neurological deficits, edema surrounding the tumor, cranial nerve palsies, and more. Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with meningioma mainly depends on the grade and the extent of resection of the tumor.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
- The median age at diagnosis of meningioma is about 65 years, with incidence increasing with advancing age.[1]
- Absence of calcification, age 60 or younger, and initial tumor diameter of greater than 25 mm are among the factors associated with a short time to progression.[2]
- Linear growth may be seen in 44% of the patients, while volumetric growth may be seen in 74%.[2]
- A higher annual growth rate may be seen in patients with an initial tumor diameter of greater than 25 mm, MR imaging T2 signal hyperintensity, patients presenting with symptoms and edema, and male patients.[2]
- Meningomas are usually single but can be multiple in about 1 – 10% of the patients. Multiple meningiomas are usually seen in patients with neurofibromatosis.[3][4]
- The rate of growth in patients with multiple meningiomas is similar to those with solitary meningiomas.
- Meningiomas can grow anywhere in the central nervous system containing arachnoid membrane. For example, between the brain and the cranium, in the ventricles, down the spinal canal.[5]
Complications
- Increased intracranial pressure
- Cranial nerve palsies
- Hydrocephalus
- Peritumoral brain edema
- Stroke: Due to occlusion of the internal carotid artery. This can be seen in meningiomas located at the skull base
Prognosis
- The prognosis of meningioma is usually determined by 2 of the most important factors which are the extent of the resection and the histological grade of the tumor.[8]
- The 5 year estimated survival for benign tumors is 85.6%, 82.3% for borderline malignant tumors, and 66% for malignant tumors. A poorer survival rate may be seen in patients of advanced age, male patients, black race, malignant tumors, and patients with no initial treatment.[1]
- Patients with atypical meningioma have a higher overall recurrence-free survival rate than those with anaplastic meningioma.[9]
- The prognostic factors in patients with anaplastic meningioma include brain invasion, adjuvant radiotherapy, malignant progression, p53 over expression, and extent of resection.[9]
- There may be a chance of recurrence of higher grade meningiomas even if they received gross-total resection or not.[8]
- Grade 1 meningioma is associated with a median survival of approximately 10 years.[10]
- Grade 3 meningioma is associated with a median survival of approximately 2.7 years.
- For classic tumors, the 5 year recurrence rate is about 12%, and they are not associated with a decreased overall length of survival. Unlike atypical tumors which have a 41% recurrence rate and decreased overall length of survival.[8]
- Progesterone positive tumors tend to have lower proliferation indices resulting in a better prognosis than those that are progesterone receptor negative.[8]
- The tumors that are positive for estrogen receptors and those negative for both estrogen and progesterone receptors have an increased potential for aggressive clinical behavior, progression and recurrence.[11]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Dolecek TA, Dressler EV, Thakkar JP, Liu M, Al-Qaisi A, Villano JL (2015). “Epidemiology of meningiomas post-Public Law 107-206: The Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act”. Cancer. 121 (14): 2400–10. doi:10.1002/cncr.29379. PMC 5549267. PMID 25872752.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Oya S, Kim SH, Sade B, Lee JH (2011). “The natural history of intracranial meningiomas”. J Neurosurg. 114 (5): 1250–6. doi:10.3171/2010.12.JNS101623. PMID 21250802.
- ↑ Wong RH, Wong AK, Vick N, Farhat HI (2013). “Natural history of multiple meningiomas”. Surg Neurol Int. 4: 71. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.112617. PMC 3683641. PMID 23776757.
- ↑ Sheehy JP, Crockard HA (1983). “Multiple meningiomas: a long-term review”. J Neurosurg. 59 (1): 1–5. doi:10.3171/jns.1983.59.1.0001. PMID 6864264.
- ↑ Sumkovski R, Micunovic M, Kocevski I, Ilievski B, Petrov I (2019). “Surgical Treatment of Meningiomas – Outcome Associated With Type of Resection, Recurrence, Karnofsky Performance Score, Mitotic Count”. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 7 (1): 56–64. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.503. PMC 6352459. PMID 30740161.
- ↑ Shibuya M (2015). “Pathology and molecular genetics of meningioma: recent advances”. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 55 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0233. PMC 4533397. PMID 25744347.
- ↑ Komotar, R J (2003). “Meningioma presenting as stroke: report of two cases and estimation of incidence”. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 74 (1): 136–137. doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.1.136. ISSN 0022-3050.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Commins, Deborah L.; Atkinson, Roscoe D.; Burnett, Margaret E. (2007). “Review of meningioma histopathology”. Neurosurgical Focus. 23 (4): E3. doi:10.3171/FOC-07/10/E3. ISSN 1092-0684.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Yang SY, Park CK, Park SH, Kim DG, Chung YS, Jung HW (2008). “Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: prognostic implications of clinicopathological features”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 79 (5): 574–80. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.121582. PMID 17766430.
- ↑ Fathi AR, Roelcke U (2013). “Meningioma”. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 13 (4): 337. doi:10.1007/s11910-013-0337-4. PMID 23463172.
- ↑ Pravdenkova, Svetlana; Al-Mefty, Ossama; Sawyer, Jeffrey; Husain, Muhammad (2006). “Progesterone and estrogen receptors: opposing prognostic indicators in meningiomas”. Journal of Neurosurgery. 105 (2): 163–173. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.163. ISSN 0022-3085.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Meningioma cost-effectiveness of therapy | Future or Investigational therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
