Melanoma
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[3]
Synonyms and keywords: Malignant melanoma; Acral lentiginous melanoma; Lentiginous melanoma; Lentigo maligna melanoma; Nodular melanoma; Amelanotic melanoma; Familial melanoma; Non-pigmented melanoma; MM; Metastatic melanoma; Metastatic malignant melanoma; Cutaneous melanoma; Actinic melanosis; Solar melanoma; Melanose; Malignant nevus; Melanocyte malignancy; Melanotic cancer
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.; Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]
Overview
Malignant melanoma is the most common fatal skin cancer that arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150 – 200 per 100,000 individuals. It may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome). Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 subtypes of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations (multiple hits). The progression to melanoma usually involves the serine–threonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the subtype of melanoma and amelanotic (no pigmentation) melanomas are not uncommon. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each subtype of melanoma has unique characteristic features. The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs both horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver, and skin (distant site). The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is highly dependent on the stage at diagnosis. Staging is based on the 2010 AJCC TNM Classification and is divided into stage 0 or melanoma in situ, stage I or invasive melanoma with good prognosis, stage II or high-risk melanoma, stage III or melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis, and stage IV or melanoma with distant metastasis. The predominant treatment for primary melanoma is wide excision of the lesion margins. The choice of clinical margins is based on the tumor thickness. When lymph nodes are involved, complete dissection of the nodal basin is recommended. Chemotherapy is indicated for high risk melanomas (stages IIB-IV) as adjuvant therapy and for metastatic disease as first-line therapy. Once diagnosed, follow-up at regular intervals is recommended.
Historical Perspective
Melanoma was first described by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC. It was often described as the fatal black tumor. In 1838, the term melanoma was first proposed by Sir Robert Carswell, a British pathologist. In 1956, Henry Lancaster, an Australian mathematician, was the first to discover the association between UV radiation exposure and development of melanoma. In 2003, BRAF mutations were first identified in the pathogenesis of melanoma.
Classification
Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 subtypes of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Less common subtypes of melanoma include desmoplastic/spindle cell melanoma, nevoid melanoma, spitzoid melanocytic melanoma, angiotropic melanoma, blue nevus-like melanoma, and composite melanoma.
Pathophysiology
Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations. The progression to melanoma usually involves the serine–threonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the subtype of melanoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each subtype of melanoma has unique characteristic features. All patients with suspected melanoma require biopsy. Findings on biopsy may distinguish the subtype and the stage of melanoma.
Causes
Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome).
Differential Diagnosis
Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as other skin cancers, premalignant skin tumors, and benign skin lesions.
Epidemiology and Demographics
The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150 – 200 per 100,000 individuals. The majority of patients are diagnosed after the age of 65 years. Melanoma is more common among males and individuals of Caucasian race.
Risk Factors
The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Other risk factors include old age, male gender, family history of melanoma, personal history of skin cancers, immunodeficiency, and certain hereditary disorders.
Screening
The 1992-1994 free American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program provided broad skin cancer educationalinformation to general public and enabled thousands of free expert skin cancer examinations. The 2001-2005 American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program emphasized on the use of HARMM criteria to identify the higher-risk subgroup of skin cancer screening population via assessment of multiple risk factors for MM hence, both reducing the cost & increasing the yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives. MelanomaGenetics Program identifies the genetic causes of skin cancer, and provides genetic counseling to the individuals with strong family history of melanoma. Dermoscopy usage improves the ability of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer, thus saving from unnecessary expert consultations. Combination of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) in a primary care setting doubles the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosisand leads to >50% chance of reduction in excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Melanoma is an aggressive tumor characterized by early metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver, and skin (distant site). Complications of melanoma are usually related to the site of metastasis. The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is approximately 93%. Features associated with worse prognosis are tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), depth related to skin structures (Clark level), type of melanoma, presence of ulceration, presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion, location of lesion, presence of satellite lesions, and presence of regional or distant metastasis.
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Symptoms of melanoma include a rapidly growing existing nevus, non-healing skin ulcers, pruritus, or bone pain.
Physical Examination
Physical examination findings suggestive of malignant melanoma include ABCDE: Asymmetry of lesion, Border irregularity, Color change, large Diameter, and Evolution over time.
Laboratory Findings
There are no laboratory findings associated with the diagnosis of melanoma. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) may be elevated among patients with metastasis.
Biopsy
All patients with suspected melanoma require biopsy. Findings on biopsy may distinguish the subtype and the stage of melanoma.
Staging
Staging of melanoma is essential to determine the prognosis. Staging is based on the 2010 AJCC TNM Classification and is divided into stage 0 or melanoma in situ, stage I or invasive melanoma with good prognosis, stage II or high-risk melanoma, stage III or melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis, and stage IV or melanoma with distant metastasis.
Chest X Ray
There are no chest x-ray findings associated with melanoma.
CT
There are no CT scan findings associated with melanoma. Chest CT scan is recommended for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).
MRI
There are no MRI scan findings associated with melanoma. Brain MRI may be considered for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).
Echocardiography or Ultrasound
There are no ultrasound findings associated with melanoma.
Other Imaging Findings
There are no PET scan findings associated with melanoma. Chest PET scan may be considered for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).
Other Diagnostic Studies
No additional tests are recommended for the diagnosis of melanoma.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Chemotherapy is indicated for high risk melanomas (stages IIB-IV) as adjuvant therapy and for metastatic disease as first-line therapy. Several single agent and combination regimens have been studied, all with modest impact on survival. All current guidelines still recommend enrollment in clinical trials over current available regimens for patients with metastatic disease. Interferon therapy is the only regimen recommended as adjuvant therapy.
Surgery
The predominant treatment for primary melanoma is wide excision of the lesion margins. The choice of clinical margins is based on the tumor thickness. When lymph nodes are involved, complete dissection of the nodal basin is recommended.
Primary Prevention
Primary prevention of melanoma includes avoidance of sunlight/ultraviolet radiation exposure.
Secondary Prevention
The choice of work-up for secondary prevention of melanoma is based on the stage of melanoma at diagnosis. Secondary prevention includes monthly self-exams, routine dermatologic evaluations, and chest and brain imaging.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
Melanoma was first described by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC. It was often described as the fatal black tumor. In 1838, the term melanoma was first proposed by Sir Robert Carswell, a British pathologist. In 1956, Henry Lancaster, an Australian mathematician, was the first to discover the association between UV radiation exposure and development of melanoma. In 2003, BRAF mutations were first identified in the pathogenesis of melanoma.
Historical Perspective
Discovery
- Melanoma was first described by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC. It was often described as the fatal black tumor.[1][2]
- Initially, melanoma was thought to be associated with black carbon deposits in patients with lung cancer. It was not until 1804 that René Laennec, a French physician and inventor of the stethoscope, distinguished melanoma (referred to as melanose) as a unique disease.
- In 1838, the term melanoma was first proposed by Sir Robert Carswell, a British pathologist.[1]
- The association between hereditary diseases and melanoma was first made by William Norris, a British general practitioner.[3]
- In 1853, Sir James Paget, a British surgeon, described the characteristic radial and vertical growth phases of melanoma.[4]
- In 1905, the surgical management using “excision and dissection in continuity” was first suggested by William Handley, a British researcher. This surgical approach remained the predominant therapeutic approach for the management of melanoma until the mid-20th century.[4]
- In 1956, Henry Lancaster, an Australian mathematician, was the first to discover the association between UV radiation exposure and development of melanoma.[4][5]
- In 1970, Alexander Breslow evaluated factors that alter the prognosis of melanoma, including tumor size, depth of invasion, and tumor thickness. The total vertical depth was later referred to as Breslow’s depth.
- In 2003, BRAF mutations were first identified in the pathogenesis of melanoma.[4][6][7]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Karamanou M, Liappas I, Stamboulis E, Lymperi M, Kyriakis K, Androutsos G (2012). “Sir Robert Carswell (1793-1857): coining the term “melanoma““. J BUON. 17 (2): 400–2. PMID 22740229.
- ↑ Urteaga O, Pack GT (1966). “On the antiquity of melanoma”. Cancer. 19 (5): 607–10. PMID 5326247.
- ↑ Norris W. (1820). “Case of fungoid disease”. Edinb Med Surg J. 16: 562–565.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Rebecca VW, Sondak VK, Smalley KS (2012). “A brief history of melanoma: from mummies to mutations”. Melanoma Res. 22 (2): 114–22. doi:10.1097/CMR.0b013e328351fa4d. PMC 3303163. PMID 22395415.
- ↑ LANCASTER HO (1956). “Some geographical aspects of the mortality from melanoma in Europeans”. Med J Aust. 43 (26): 1082–7. PMID 13347440.
- ↑ Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, Denoyelle C, Kuilman T, van der Horst CM; et al. (2005). “BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi”. Nature. 436 (7051): 720–4. doi:10.1038/nature03890. PMID 16079850.
- ↑ Breslow A, Macht SD (1977). “Optimal size of resection margin for thin cutaneous melanoma”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 145 (5): 691–2. PMID 910211.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 sub-types of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Less common sub-types of melanoma include desmoplastic/spindle cell melanoma, nevoid melanoma, spitzoid melanocytic melanoma, angiotropic melanoma, blue nevus-like melanoma, and composite melanoma.
Classification of Melanoma
Shown below is a table that demonstrates the various sub-classes of melanoma:[1][2]
| Subtype | Frequency | Clinical Features |
| Common Subtypes | ||
| Superficial spreading melanoma | 70% |
|
| Nodular melanoma | 15-25% |
|
| Acral lentiginous melanoma | 5% |
|
| Lentigo maligna melanoma | 1-5% |
|
| Non-cutaneous melanoma | 5% | |
| Less Common Subtypes | ||
| Desmoplastic/Spindle cell melanoma | Rare |
|
| Nevoid melanoma | Rare |
|
| Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasm | Rare |
|
| Angiotropic melanoma | Rare | |
| Blue nevus-like melanoma | Rare |
|
| Composite melanoma | Rare |
|
References
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations. The progression to melanoma usually involves the serine-threonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the sub-type of melanoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each sub-type of melanoma has unique characteristic features.
Pathophysiology
Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties).
Genetics
- The development of melanoma begins with the disruption of nevus growth control.[1]
- The progression to melanoma usually involves the serine-threonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene.
- It is thought that the progression to melanoma requires multiple genetic mutations, where activation of the oncogene alone does not lead to the development of melanoma, and additional mutations (multiple hits), such as loss-of-function mutation of P53 tumor suppressor gene (or less commonly P16/CDKN2A or PTEN in familial cases) is required for the development of melanoma.[1]
- The development of melanoma may arise de novo or from pre-existing nevi. In both cases, mutations result in dysplasia and cytologic atypia that predispose to the malignant potential of the cells.
- As more genes are mutated and the tumor grows, changes include the overexpression of N-cadherin, αVβ3 integrin, MMP2, MSH, cAMP, and survivin, and the loss of E-cadherin and TRMP1 proteins.[1]
- The following genes are involved in the pathogenesis of melanoma:[1]
Pathology
- Characteristic features on gross pathology and microscopic analysis are variable depending on the melanoma sub-type.
- The following table illustrates the findings on gross pathology and microscopic analysis of the sub-types of melanoma:[2][3]
| Melanoma Subtype | Features on Gross Pathology | Features on Histopathological Microscopic Analysis |
| Superficial spreading melanoma |
|
|
| Nodular melanoma |
| |
| Acral lentiginous melanoma |
|
|
| Lentigo maligna melanoma |
|
|
| Non-cutaneous melanoma |
|
|
| Desmoplastic/Spindle cell melanoma |
|
|
| Nevoid melanoma |
|
|
| Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasm |
|
|
| Angiotropic melanoma |
|
|
| Blue nevus-like melanoma |
|
|
| Composite melanoma |
Features of more than one sub-type on gross pathology |
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Miller AJ, Mihm MC (2006). “Melanoma”. N Engl J Med. 355 (1): 51–65. doi:10.1056/NEJMra052166. PMID 16822996.
- ↑ Schanderdorf D, Kochs C, Livingstone E (2013). Handbook of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer.
- ↑ Mooi W, Krausz T (2007). Pathology of Melanocytic Disorders 2nd Ed. CRC Press.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photo-protective properties). Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome).
Causes
Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes.[1]
Sporadic Melanoma
- The majority (90%) of the cases of melanoma are due to sporadic genetic mutations.
- More than one genetic mutation (multiple hits) is usually the requirement for the development of melanoma.
- The most common mutations that result in the development of melanoma are BRAF (approximately 50% of melanomas) and N-RAS (approximately 15% of melanomas).[1][2][3][4]
Familial Melanoma
Melanoma may be caused by hereditary diseases (10%) and is associated with mutations of the P16/CDKN2A gene:
- Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome (FAMMM syndrome)[5][6]
- Melanoma–astrocytoma syndrome[7]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 O’Brien O, Lyons T, Murphy S, Feeley L, Power D, Heffron C (November 2017). “BRAF V600 mutation detection in melanoma: a comparison of two laboratory testing methods”. J. Clin. Pathol. 70 (11): 935–940. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204367. PMID 28424234. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
- ↑ Wong K, Robles-Espinoza CD, Rodriguez D, Rudat SS, Puig S, Potrony M, Wong CC, Hewinson J, Aguilera P, Puig-Butille JA, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Zattara H, van der Weyden L, Fletcher C, Brenn T, Arends MJ, Quesada V, Newton-Bishop JA, Lopez-Otin C, Bishop DT, Harms PW, Johnson TM, Durham AB, Lombard DB, Adams DJ (December 2018). “Association of the POT1 Germline Missense Variant p.I78T With Familial Melanoma”. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3662. PMID 30586141. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
- ↑ Ponti G, Manfredini M, Greco S, Pellacani G, Depenni R, Tomasi A, Maccaferri M, Cascinu S (December 2017). “BRAF, NRAS and C-KIT Advanced Melanoma: Clinico-pathological Features, Targeted-Therapy Strategies and Survival”. Anticancer Res. 37 (12): 7043–7048. doi:10.21873/anticanres.12175. PMID 29187493.
- ↑ Parekh V, Sobanko J, Miller CJ, Karakousis G, Xu W, Letrero R, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Elder DE, Amaravadi R, Schuchter LM, Nathanson KL, Wilson MA, Chu EY (December 2018). “NRAS Q61R and BRAF G466A mutations in atypical melanocytic lesions newly arising in advanced melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib”. J. Cutan. Pathol. doi:10.1111/cup.13401. PMID 30552700.
- ↑ Perkins A, Duffy RL (June 2015). “Atypical moles: diagnosis and management”. Am Fam Physician. 91 (11): 762–7. PMID 26034853.
- ↑ Cremin C, Howard S, Le L, Karsan A, Schaeffer DF, Renouf D, Schrader KA (2018). “CDKN2A founder mutation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients without cutaneous features of Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome”. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 16: 7. doi:10.1186/s13053-018-0088-y. PMC 5842519. PMID 29541281.
- ↑ Chan AK, Han SJ, Choy W, Beleford D, Aghi MK, Berger MS, Shieh JT, Bollen AW, Perry A, Phillips JJ, Butowski N, Solomon DA (2017). “Familial melanoma-astrocytoma syndrome: synchronous diffuse astrocytoma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in a patient with germline CDKN2A/B deletion and a significant family history”. Clin. Neuropathol. 36 (5): 213–221. doi:10.5414/NP301022. PMC 5628627. PMID 28699883.
Differentiating Melanoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as other skin cancers, premalignant skin tumors, and benign skin lesions.
Differential Diagnosis
Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as:
- Angiokeratoma[1]
- Atypical fibroxanthoma[2]
- Basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Dermatofibroma[3]
- Dermatofibroma protuberans
- Dysplastic nevus[4]
- Epithelioid (Spitz) tumors
- Halo nevus
- Histiocytoid hemangioma[5]
- Keratoacanthoma[6]
- Lentigo[7]
- Lentigo maligna
- Metastasis of other primary tumors
- Mycosis fungoides[8]
- Oral candidiasis[9]
- Peripheral nerve sheath tumor
- Pigmented actinic keratosis[10]
- Scar tissue or keloid
- Sclerosing angioma[11]
- Sclerosing blue nevus[12][13]
- Sarcoma
- Sebaceous carcinoma[14]
- Seborrheic keratosis[15][16]
- Spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma[17]
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin[18]
- Traumatic hematoma[19][20]
- Melanocytic nevus and other benign melanocytic lesions[21]
- Traumatized nevus
- Venous lake
- Vitiligo[22]
Oral melanoma must be differentiated from other mouth lesions such as oral candidiasis and aphthous ulcer
| Disease | Presentation | Risk Factors | Diagnosis | Affected Organ Systems | Important features | Picture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diseases predominantly affecting the oral cavity | ||||||
| Oral Candidiasis |
|
|
|
Localized candidiasis
Invasive candidasis |
|
![]() |
| Herpes simplex oral lesions |
|
|
|
|
![]() | |
| Aphthous ulcers |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Squamous cell carcinoma |
|
|
![]() | |||
| Leukoplakia |
|
|
|
|
![]() | |
| Melanoma |
|
|
|
|
![]() | |
| Fordyce spots |
|
|
|
|
![]() | |
| Burning mouth syndrome |
|
|
||||
| Torus palatinus |
|
![]() | ||||
| Diseases involving oral cavity and other organ systems | ||||||
| Behcet’s disease |
|
|
|
![]() | ||
| Crohn’s disease |
|
|
|
|||
| Agranulocytosis |
|
|
||||
| Syphilis[25] |
|
|
|
![]() | ||
| Coxsackie virus |
|
|
| |||
| Chicken pox |
|
|
|
|
![]() | |
| Measles |
|
|
|
![]() | ||
References
- ↑ Dumitrache N, Neiderer K, Martin B, Dancho J (2013). “Angiokeratoma presenting as a melanoma: a case report”. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 103 (3): 241–2. PMID 23697732.
- ↑ Pujani M, Hassan MJ, Jetley S (2015). “Atypical fibroxanthoma in a young female misdiagnosed clinically as a malignant melanoma–An unusual presentation”. J Cancer Res Ther. 11 (4): 1027. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.150353. PMID 26881598.
- ↑ AlJasser MI, Martinka M, Kalia S (January 2014). “Dermatofibroma mimicking melanoma dermoscopically”. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 39 (1): 69–70. doi:10.1111/ced.12155. PMID 24256198.
- ↑ Bahuau M, Vidaud D, Kujas M, Palangié A, Assouline B, Chaignaud-Lebreton M, Prieur M, Vidaud M, Harpey JP, Lafourcade J, Caille B (1997). “Familial aggregation of malignant melanoma/dysplastic naevi and tumours of the nervous system: an original syndrome of tumour proneness”. Ann. Genet. 40 (2): 78–91. PMID 9259954.
- ↑ Uzzauto MT (January 2015). “Melanoma hidden in a hemangioma”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 72 (1 Suppl): S56–7. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.011. PMID 25500044.
- ↑ Wakimoto H, Harada K, Arai T, Maeda T, Irisawa R, Tsuboi R (February 2017). “Reduced expression of the ATP2A2 gene in vemurafenib-induced keratoacanthoma-like papules in a melanoma patient”. Int. J. Dermatol. 56 (2): e33–e35. doi:10.1111/ijd.13430. PMID 27805257.
- ↑ Charifa A, Chen C. PMID 29489150. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty
|title=(help) - ↑ Imafuku K, Hata H, Yanagi T, Kitamura S, Inamura-Takashima Y, Nishimura M, Kitamura S, Moriwaki S, Shimizu H (July 2017). “Multiple skin cancers in patients with mycosis fungoides after long-term ultraviolet phototherapy”. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 42 (5): 523–526. doi:10.1111/ced.13121. PMID 28543586.
- ↑ Gu GM, Epstein JB, Morton TH (October 2003). “Intraoral melanoma: long-term follow-up and implication for dental clinicians. A case report and literature review”. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 96 (4): 404–13. doi:10.1016/S1079210403003202. PMID 14561964.
- ↑ Kelati A, Baybay H, Moscarella E, Argenziano G, Gallouj S, Mernissi FZ (November 2017). “Dermoscopy of Pigmented Actinic Keratosis of the Face: A Study of 232 Cases”. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 108 (9): 844–851. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2017.05.002. PMID 28705516.
- ↑ Campagnoli TR, Medina CA, Singh AD (2016). “CHOROIDAL MELANOMA INITIALLY TREATED AS HEMANGIOMA: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CONSIDERATIONS”. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 10 (2): 175–82. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000000220. PMID 26448544.
- ↑ Borgenvik TL, Karlsvik TM, Ray S, Fawzy M, James N (May 2017). “Blue nevus-like and blue nevus-associated melanoma: a comprehensive review of the literature”. ANZ J Surg. 87 (5): 345–349. doi:10.1111/ans.13946. PMID 28318130.
- ↑ Hussain A, Sidiropoulos M, Das S, Munoz DG, Nijhawan N (June 2017). “Orbital cellular blue nevus complicated by malignant melanoma”. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 52 (3): e111–e113. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.025. PMID 28576220.
- ↑ Ribeiro F, Leocadia E, Macarenco RS, Lapins J, Huet P, Akay BN, Steiner D (July 2017). “Reticulated acanthoma with sebaceous differentiation mimicking melanoma”. Dermatol Pract Concept. 7 (3): 35–37. doi:10.5826/dpc.0703a07. PMC 5661163. PMID 29085717.
- ↑ Carrera C, Segura S, Aguilera P, Scalvenzi M, Longo C, Barreiro A, Broganelli P, Cavicchini S, Llambrich A, Zaballos P, Thomas L, Malvehy J, Puig S, Zalaudek I (June 2017). “Dermoscopic Clues for Diagnosing Melanomas That Resemble Seborrheic Keratosis”. JAMA Dermatol. 153 (6): 544–551. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0129. PMC 5540029. PMID 28355453.
- ↑ Braun RP, Ludwig S, Marghoob AA (September 2017). “Differential Diagnosis of Seborrheic Keratosis: Clinical and Dermoscopic Features”. J Drugs Dermatol. 16 (9): 835–842. PMID 28915278.
- ↑ Cohen DN, Lumbang WA, Boyd AS, Sosman JA, Zwerner JP (May 2014). “Spindle cell squamous carcinoma during BRAF inhibitor therapy for advanced melanoma: an aggressive secondary neoplasm of undetermined biologic potential”. JAMA Dermatol. 150 (5): 575–7. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.7784. PMID 24577111.
- ↑ Boespflug A, Debarbieux S, Depaepe L, Chouvet B, Maucort-Boulch D, Dalle S, Balme B, Thomas L (April 2018). “Association of subungual melanoma and subungual squamous cell carcinoma: A case series”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78 (4): 760–768. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.038. PMID 28947295.
- ↑ Tchernev G, Chokoeva AA, Wollina U, Lotti T (May 2016). “Persistent subungual and periungual hematoma versus melanoma: to cut it or to leave it?”. Dermatol Ther. 29 (3): 150–1. doi:10.1111/dth.12293. PMID 26333508.
- ↑ Deinlein T, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Zalaudek I (November 2016). “Acral melanoma mimicking subungual hematoma”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 75 (5): e181–e183. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.02.1222. PMID 27745646.
- ↑ Damsky WE, Bosenberg M (October 2017). “Melanocytic nevi and melanoma: unraveling a complex relationship”. Oncogene. 36 (42): 5771–5792. doi:10.1038/onc.2017.189. PMC 5930388. PMID 28604751.
- ↑ Rodrigues M (April 2017). “Skin Cancer Risk (Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers/Melanoma) in Vitiligo Patients”. Dermatol Clin. 35 (2): 129–134. doi:10.1016/j.det.2016.11.003. PMID 28317522.
- ↑ Ann M. Gillenwater, Nadarajah Vigneswaran, Hanadi Fatani, Pierre Saintigny & Adel K. El-Naggar (2013). “Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL): a review of an elusive pathologic entity!”. Advances in anatomic pathology. 20 (6): 416–423. doi:10.1097/PAP.0b013e3182a92df1. PMID 24113312. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Andrès E, Zimmer J, Affenberger S, Federici L, Alt M, Maloisel F. (2006). “Idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis: Update of an old disorder”. Eur J Intern Med. 17 (8): 529–35. Text “pmid 17142169” ignored (help)
- ↑ title=”By Internet Archive Book Images [No restrictions], via Wikimedia Commons” href=”https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_manual_of_syphilis_and_the_venereal_diseases%2C_(1900)_(14595882378).jpg“
- ↑ Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, Hoffman RE (2000). “Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization”. JAMA. 284 (24): 3145–50. PMID 11135778.
- ↑ Ratnam S, West R, Gadag V, Williams B, Oates E (1996). “Immunity against measles in school-aged children: implications for measles revaccination strategies”. Can J Public Health. 87 (6): 407–10. PMID 9009400.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[3]
Overview
The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150-200 per 100,000 individuals. The majority of patients are diagnosed after the age of 65 years. Melanoma is more common among males and individuals of the Caucasian race. In 2025, cutaneous melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the U.S.[1], and by 2040, it is expected to become the second most common. [2]
Epidemiology and Demographics
Prevalence
- In the United States, the age-adjusted prevalence of melanoma was 187 per 100,000 individuals in 2011.[3]
Incidence
- The delay-adjusted incidence of melanoma in 2011 was estimated to be 23.21 per 100,000 persons in the United States.[3]
- In 2011, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma was 22.74 per 100,000 persons in the United States.[3]
- In 2025, an estimated 104,960 new cases of cutaneous melanoma are expected in the U.S., comprising 60,550 in males and 44,410 in females.[1]
Age
- While the overall age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in the United States between 2007 and 2011 is 21.3 per 100,000, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma by age category is:[3]
- Under 65 years: 12.6 per 100,000
- 65 and over: 81.1 per 100,000
- Shown below is an image that demonstrates the delay-adjusted incidence and observed incidence of melanoma by age and gender in the United States between 1975 and 2011. These graphs are adapted from SEER: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute.[3]
Gender
- There is a slight male preponderance to the development of melanoma.
- The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2-1.6 to 1.
- Between 1999 and 2021, melanoma incidence rose by 57.5% in females and 47.4% in males based on age-adjusted rates.
- The image below shows trends in melanoma incidence by gender from 1999 to 2021.[4]
Race
- There is a racial preponderance to the development of melanoma, where Caucasian individuals are at a significantly increased risk compared to dark-skinned individuals.
- Shown below is a table that demonstrates the age-adjusted prevalence of melanoma by race in 2011 in the United States.[3]
| All Races | White | Black | Asian/Pacific Islander | Hispanic | |
| Age-adjusted prevalence | 187 per 100,000 | 234.5 per 100,000 | 7.5 per 100,000 | 11.1 per 100,000 | 37.9 per 100,000 |
- Shown below is a table that demonstrates the annual age-adjusted incidence of melanoma by race in 2024 in the United States.[2]
| Race | Asian | Black | Hispanic | Native American | Hispanic |
| Age-adjusted incidence | 1.3 per 100,000 | 1.0 per 100,000 | 4.8 per 100,000 | 10.3 per 100,000 | 30.6 per 100,000 |
- Shown below is an image depicting the trends for incidence of melanoma by race in the United States between 1999 and 2021.[4]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A (2025). “Cancer statistics, 2025”. CA Cancer J Clin. 75 (1): 10–45. doi:10.3322/caac.21871. PMC 11745215 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 39817679 Check|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 2.0 2.1 Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A (2024). “Cancer statistics, 2024”. CA Cancer J Clin. 74 (1): 12–49. doi:10.3322/caac.21820. PMID 38230766 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z,Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Okobi OE, Abreo E, Sams NP, Chukwuebuni OH, Tweneboa Amoako LA, Wiredu B, Uboh EE, Ekechi VC, Okafor AA (October 2024). “Trends in Melanoma Incidence, Prevalence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival: An Analysis of the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) Database”. Cureus. 16 (10): e70697. doi:10.7759/cureus.70697. PMC 11529802 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 39493095 Check|pmid=value (help).
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.
Overview
The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Other risk factors include old age, male gender, family history of melanoma, personal history of skin cancers, immunodeficiency, and certain hereditary disorders.
Risk Factors
- The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation.[1][2]
- Other risk factors for the development of melanoma are mentioned in the table below:
| Risk Factors | |
|---|---|
| Heritable |
|
| Modifiable |
|
| Non-modifiable Risk Factors | |
* Fitzpack Patrick phototypes: Ⅰ( always burns, never tans), Ⅱ ( usually burns, tans less than average), Ⅲ ( sometimes mild burns, tans about average), and IV( rarely burns, tans more than average).[9]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ghiasvand R, Rueegg CS, Weiderpass E, Green AC, Lund E, Veierød MB (February 2017). “Indoor Tanning and Melanoma Risk: Long-Term Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study”. Am. J. Epidemiol. 185 (3): 147–156. doi:10.1093/aje/kww148. PMID 28077359.
- ↑ Leiter U, Garbe C (2008). “Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer–the role of sunlight”. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 624: 89–103. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_8. PMID 18348450.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Joshi UM, Kashani-Sabet M, Kirkwood JM (August 2025). “Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13074. PMID 40853557 Check
|pmid=value (help).- Hair color (red or blonde).Joshi UM, Kashani-Sabet M, Kirkwood JM (August 2025). “Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13074. PMID 40853557 Check
|pmid=value (help).
- Hair color (red or blonde).Joshi UM, Kashani-Sabet M, Kirkwood JM (August 2025). “Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13074. PMID 40853557 Check
- ↑ Herraiz C, Jiménez-Cervantes C, Sánchez-Laorden B, García-Borrón JC (June 2018). “Functional interplay between secreted ligands and receptors in melanoma”. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 78: 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.021. PMID 28676423.
- ↑ Francis JH, Levin AM, Abramson DH (2016). “Update on Ophthalmic Oncology 2014: Retinoblastoma and Uveal Melanoma”. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 5 (5): 368–82. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000213. PMID 27632029.
- ↑ Naouali C, Jones M, Nabouli I, Jerbi M, Tounsi H, Ben Rekaya M, Ben Ahmed M, Bouhaouala B, Messaoud O, Khaled A, Zghal M, Abdelhak S, Boubaker S, Yacoub-Youssef H (January 2017). “Epidemiological trends and clinicopathological features of cutaneous melanoma in sporadic and xeroderma pigmentosum Tunisian patients”. Int. J. Dermatol. 56 (1): 40–48. doi:10.1111/ijd.13448. PMID 27785785.
- ↑ Yin L, Pang G, Niu C, Habasi M, Dou J, Aisa HA (June 2018). “A novel psoralen derivative-MPFC enhances melanogenesis via activation of p38 MAPK and PKA signaling pathways in B16 cells”. Int. J. Mol. Med. 41 (6): 3727–3735. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3529. PMID 29512683.
- ↑ Müller C, Wendt J, Rauscher S, Sunder-Plassmann R, Richtig E, Fae I, Fischer G, Okamoto I (December 2018). “Risk Factors of Subsequent Primary Melanomas in Austria”. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4645. PMID 30566178.
- ↑ Gupta V, Sharma VK (2019). “Skin typing: Fitzpatrick grading and others”. Clin Dermatol. 37 (5): 430–436. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.07.010. PMID 31896400.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D. Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]
Overview
The 1992-1994 free American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program provided broad skin cancer educational information to general public and enabled thousands of free expert skin cancer examinations. The 2001-2005 American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program emphasized on the use of HARMM criteria to identify the higher-risk subgroup of skin cancer screening population via assessment of multiple risk factors for MM hence, both reducing the cost & increasing the yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives. Melanoma Genetics Program identifies the genetic causes of skin cancer, and provides genetic counseling to the individuals with strong family history of melanoma. Dermoscopy usage improves the ability of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer, thus saving from unnecessary expert consultations. Combination of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) in a primary care setting doubles the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis and leads to >50% chance of reduction in excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions.
Screening
According to different studies going on for so many years, following data is available regarding the different methods/tools and their effectiveness for skin cancer screening:
- From 1992 to 1994, free American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program was launched which provided broad skin cancer educational information to general public and enabled almost 750,000 free expert skin cancer examinations which mostly found out thin, localized stage 1 melanomas with high projected 5-year survival rate[1][2]
- From 2001 to 2005, American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program was launched which led to the conclusion that HARMM criteria can be used to identify the higher-risk subgroup of skin cancer screening population via assessment of multiple risk factors for MM , which will not only reduce the cost but will also increase the yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives[3]
- Melanoma Genetics Program identifies the genetic causes of skin cancer, and also provides genetic counseling to the individuals having a strong family history of melanoma[4][5][6][1][7][8][9]
- Dermoscopy usage improves the ability of primary care physicians to triage lesions which are suggestive of skin cancer and saves from unnecessary expert consultations[10]
- Combination of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) in a primary care setting doubles the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis and also leads to >50% chance of reduction in excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions[11][12][13][14][15]
- In 2023, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) reported insufficient evidence to support routine visual skin examination for melanoma screening in asymptomatic individuals. Screening is instead recommended for high-risk patients, such as those with significant UV exposure, fair skin that burns easily (Fitzpatrick I-II) , personal or family history of skin cancer, numerous or atypical moles, or immunosuppression.[16],[17]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 “Skin Cancer (Melanoma) Treatment Program – Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA”.
- ↑ Koh HK, Norton LA, Geller AC, Sun T, Rigel DS, Miller DR; et al. (1996). “Evaluation of the American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 34 (6): 971–8. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90274-1. PMID 8647990.
- ↑ Goldberg MS, Doucette JT, Lim HW, Spencer J, Carucci JA, Rigel DS (2007). “Risk factors for presumptive melanoma in skin cancer screening: American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program experience 2001-2005”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 57 (1): 60–6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.010. PMID 17490783.
- ↑ Gauwerky K, Ruzicka T, Berking C (2009). “[Skin cancer screening at the family doctor’s office]”. MMW Fortschr Med. 151 (25): 38–42, quiz 43. PMID 19739523.
- ↑ Treiber N, Huber MA, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Schneider LA (2014). “[Early detection of skin cancer]”. MMW Fortschr Med. 156 (4): 37–40. PMID 24908774.
- ↑ Mierzwa T, Zegarski W, Placek W, Zegarska B (2004). “[Skin cancer screening program in the population of Bydgoszcz]”. Wiad Lek. 57 Suppl 1: 211–4. PMID 15884241.
- ↑ Bajaj S, Wolner ZJ, Dusza SW, Braun RP, Marghoob AA, DeFazio J (2019). “Total Body Skin Examination Practices: A Survey Study Amongst Dermatologists at High-Risk Skin Cancer Clinics”. Dermatol Pract Concept. 9 (2): 132–138. doi:10.5826/dpc.0902a09. PMC 6502292 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 31106016. - ↑ Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Bakos RM, Bergman W, Blum A; et al. (2012). “Total body skin examination for skin cancer screening in patients with focused symptoms”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 66 (2): 212–9. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.039. PMID 21757257.
- ↑ “Skin Cancer Screening: MedlinePlus Lab Test Information”.
- ↑ Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, Sera F, Corona R, Alsina M; et al. (2006). “Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer”. J Clin Oncol. 24 (12): 1877–82. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0864. PMID 16622262.
- ↑ Menzies SW, Emery J, Staples M, Davies S, McAvoy B, Fletcher J; et al. (2009). “Impact of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging for the management of pigmented lesions in primary care: a sequential intervention trial”. Br J Dermatol. 161 (6): 1270–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09374.x. PMID 19747359.
- ↑ van der Rhee JI, Bergman W, Kukutsch NA (2010). “The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented lesions in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists: a prospective study”. Br J Dermatol. 162 (3): 563–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09551.x. PMID 19832836.
- ↑ Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR; et al. (2018). “Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD011902. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011902.pub2. PMC 6517096 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 30521682. - ↑ Ferrante di Ruffano L, Takwoingi Y, Dinnes J, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Davenport C; et al. (2018). “Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD013186. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013186. PMC 6517147 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 30521691. - ↑ Ferrante di Ruffano L, Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Davenport C; et al. (2018). “Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD013189. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013189. PMID 30521690.
- ↑ Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, Chelmow D, Coker TR, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Jaén CR, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Rao G, Ruiz JM, Stevermer J, Tsevat J, Underwood SM, Wong JB (April 2023). “Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement”. JAMA. 329 (15): 1290–1295. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.4342. PMID 37071089 Check
|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Henrikson NB, Ivlev I, Blasi PR, Nguyen MB, Senger CA, Perdue LA, Lin JS (April 2023). “Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force”. JAMA. 329 (15): 1296–1307. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.3262. PMID 37071090 Check
|pmid=value (help).
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]
Overview
If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Melanoma is an aggressive tumor characterized by early metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver and skin (secondary distant site). Complications of melanoma are usually related to the site of metastasis. The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is approximately 93%. Features associated with worse prognosis are tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), depth related to skin structures (Clark level), type of melanoma, presence of ulceration, presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion, location of lesion, presence of satellite lesions, and the presence of regional or distant metastasis.
Natural History
- If left untreated, melanocytes first proliferate randomly with an aberrant growth within an existing nevus.
- More advanced stages are characterized by a radial growth phase with intraepidermal growth and penetration into the papillary dermis.
- Final stages demonstrate a vertical growth phase with dermal invasion and widening of the papillary dermis before cancerous cells finally metastasize to other parts of the skin and other organs.
Complications
Complications of melanoma are usually due to distant metastasis. Common sites of metastasis are shown below:
Prognosis
Determinants of Prognosis
- Tumor thickness in millimeters (Breslow’s depth)
- Depth related to skin structures (Clark level)
- Type of melanoma
- Presence of ulceration
- Presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion
- Presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (if present, prognosis is better)
- Location of lesion
- Presence of satellite lesions
- Presence of regional or distant metastasis
TNM Staging
- The TNM staging classification summarizes most of the above mentioned findings. Using the TNM classification, prognosis can be determined based on the stage of the disease as follows:
- Stage 0: Melanoma in situ, 100% Survival
- Stage I: Invasive Melanoma, 85-95% Survival
- Stage II: High Risk Melanoma, 40-85% Survival
- Stage III: Regional Metastasis, 25-60% Survival
- Stage IV: Distant Metastasis, 9-15% Survival
Please check the staging page for more details about the staging scheme and the TNM classification.
Breslow’s Depth
- The Breslow’s depth is independent of other features of the tumor and has been demonstrated to be associated with 5-year survival:
| Breslow’s Depth | 5-year survival |
|---|---|
| < 0.76 mm | 95% to 100% |
| 0.76-1.5 mm | 80% to 96% |
| 1.5-4 mm | 60% to 75% |
| > 4 mm | 37% to 50% |
Micro-metastasis vs. Macro-metastasis
- Extent of malignancy within a node is also important; micro-metastases in which malignancy is only microscopic have a more favorable prognosis than macro-metastases.
- In some cases, micro-metastases may only be detected by special staining, and if malignancy is only detectable polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the prognosis is better.
- Macro-metastases in which malignancy is clinically apparent (in some cases cancer completely replaces a node) have a far worse prognosis, and if nodes are matted or if there is extra-capsular extension, the prognosis is still worse.
5-Year Survival
- When stratified by age, the 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma was 92.7% and 88.2% for patients <65 and ≥ 65 years of age respectively.[3]
- When there is distant metastasis, the cancer is generally considered incurable. The five year survival rate is less than 10%.[4]
- The survival of patients with melanoma varies with the stage of the disease. Shown below is a table depicting the 5-year relative survival by the stage of melanoma:[3]
| Stage | 5-year relative survival (%), 2004-2010 |
|---|---|
| All stages | 91.3% |
| Localized | 98.1% |
| Regional | 62.6% |
| Distant | 16.1% |
| Unstaged | 78.4% |
- Shown below is an image depicting the 5-year conditional relative survival (probability of surviving in the next 5-years given the cohort has already survived 0, 1, 3 years) between 1998 and 2010 of melanoma by stage at diagnosis according to SEER. These graphs are adapted from SEER: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute.[3]
- The 5-year relative survival rate for melanoma of the skin for diagnoses during 2014-2020 was 94% for all races and ethnicities, including White individuals.[5]
- For Black individuals, the 5-year relative survival rate for melanoma of the skin during 2014-2020 was 70%. [5]
References
- ↑ Brant JM (November 2013). “Breathlessness with pulmonary metastases: a multimodal approach”. J Adv Pract Oncol. 4 (6): 415–22. PMC 4093448. PMID 25032021.
- ↑ Homsi J, Kashani-Sabet M, Messina J, Daud A (2005). “Cutaneous melanoma: prognostic factors”. Cancer Control. 12 (4): 223–9. PMID 16258493.Full text (PDF)
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z,Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014.
- ↑ Balch C, Buzaid A, Soong S, Atkins M, Cascinelli N, Coit D, Fleming I, Gershenwald J, Houghton A, Kirkwood J, McMasters K, Mihm M, Morton D, Reintgen D, Ross M, Sober A, Thompson J, Thompson J (2001). “Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma”. J Clin Oncol. 19 (16): 3635–48. PMID 11504745.Full text
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A (2025). “Cancer statistics, 2025”. CA Cancer J Clin. 75 (1): 10–45. doi:10.3322/caac.21871. PMC 11745215 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 39817679 Check|pmid=value (help).
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Biopsy | Chest X ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
2019 AAD Guidelines for management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma (CM)
2019 AAD Guidelines for management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma (CM)
Guidelines for Diagnosis of Primary CM | Guidelines for Treatment of Primary CM | Guidelines for management of Primary CM in Pregnancy
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH

















