Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Gelatinous carcinoma; Mucinous carcinoma

Overview


For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis was first described in 1960 by Hasebe et al. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. KRAS mutations are found in mucinous carcinomas. The organs involved in pathogenesis of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are ovary, appendix, pancreas, colon, rectum, retroperitoneal organs, testes, salivary gland, lung, bladder, and breast. On gross pathology, multiloculated, smooth grey surface, and multilocular mass with thin walls and mucinous material are characteristic findings of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, mucinous differentiation, nuclear atypia, and necrosis are characteristic findings of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma commonly affects individuals older than forty years of age. Females are more commonly affected with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas than males. Common risk factors in the development of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are obesity and post-menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), there are 4 stages of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma based on the clinical features and findings on imaging. Each stage is assigned a letter and a number that designate the tumor size, number of involved lymph node regions, and metastasis. Findings on CT suggestive of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include rounded or ovoid tumor, internal septations, and calcification. The main mode of treatment of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is chemotherapy and radiation. The most effective treatment for mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is surgical resection.

Historical Perspective

Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis was first described in 1960 by Hasebe et al.

Pathophysiology

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. KRAS mutations are found in mucinous cystadenocarcinomas. The organs involved in pathogenesis of mucinous cystadenoma are ovary, appendix, pancreas, colon, rectum, retroperitoneal organs, testes, salivary gland, lung, bladder, and breast. On gross pathology, multiloculated, smooth grey surface, and multilocular mass with thin walls and mucinous material are characteristic findings of mucinous adenocarcinoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, mucinous differentiation, nuclear atypia, and necrosis are characteristic findings of mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Causes

Mutations in the KRAS gene cause mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Differentiating Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma from other Diseases

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma must be differentiated from mucinous cystadenoma, serous cystadenoma, and pseudocyst.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma commonly affects individuals older than forty years of age. Females are more commonly affected with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas than males.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are obesity and post menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy.

Natural history, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, most of the patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinomas may be confined to the organ itself. Common complications of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include metastasis and inguinal hernia. The presence of metastasis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) there are 4 stages of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma based on the clinical features (pattern recongnition) and findings on imaging. Each stage is assigned a letter and a number that designate the tumor size, number of involved lymph node regions, and metastasis.

Staging

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), there are 4 stages of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma based on the clinical features and findings on imaging. Each stage is assigned a letter and a number that designate the tumor size, number of involved lymph node regions, and metastasis.

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of ovary include mass in the abdomen, increase in abdominal size, bloating, weight loss, shortness of breath, and pain abdomen.

Physical Examination

Patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma usually appear normal. Physical examination of patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is usually remarkable for abdominal distention, shifting dullness, a palpable abdominal mass, and coarse crackles upon auscultation of the lung bases.

Electrocardiogram

Electrocardiogram findings in patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are within normal limits.

X-Ray

X-ray is not used in the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Instead, ultrasound, CT scan and MRI are used in the diagnosis and staging of the tumor.

CT scan

Findings on CT suggestive of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include rounded or ovoid tumor, internal septations, and calcification.

MRI

Findings on MRI suggestive of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include lower signal intensity for loculi with watery mucin on T1-weighted images.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Findings on ultrasound suggestive of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include mural thickening and solid components.

Biopsy

On microscopic histopathological analysis, mucinous differentiation, nuclear atypia, and necrosis are characteristic findings of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Other imaging findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Other diagnostic studies

There are no other diagnostic studies associated with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The main mode of treatment of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is chemotherapy and radiation.

Surgery

The most effective treatment for mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is surgical resection.

Prevention

Primary prevention

There are no established methods for primary prevention of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective


For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

T DeJulio and other pathologists studying the development of colitis-induced mucinous carcinoma described the association of PTEN mutation with the development of invasive mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis was first described as a separate entity in 1960 by Hasebe et al.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. “www.nature.com” (PDF).
  2. HASEBE M, SERIZAWA S, CHINO S (1960). “[On a case of papillary cystadenocarcinoma following malignant degeneration of a papillary adenoma in the kidney pelvis]”. Yokohama Med Bull. 11: 491–500. PMID 13712095.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Please help WikiDoc by adding content here. It’s easy! Click here to learn about editing.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. KRAS mutations are found in mucinous carcinomas. The organs involved in the pathogenesis of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are ovary, appendix, pancreas, colon, rectum, retroperitoneal organs, testes, salivary gland, lung, bladder, and breast. On gross pathology, multiloculated, smooth gray surface, and multilocular mass with thin walls and mucinous material are characteristic findings of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, mucinous differentiation, nuclear atypia, and necrosis are characteristic findings of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Pathogenesis

  • Mucinous cytsadenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer.

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of Ovary

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of Pancreas

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of Appendix

Associated Conditions

  • Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is associated with mature cystic teratoma.

Gross Pathology

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of Ovary

Multiple cysts in the ovary, typical of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary. Source: Wikimedia commons

Mucinous Cystadenoma of Pancreas

Mucinous Cystadenoma of Appendix

Microscopic Pathology

Microscopic features:

Following features are common to mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of all regions:

  • Mucinous differentiation
  • Tall columnar cells with apical mucin
  • Endocervical or intestinal-like appearance
  • Back-to-back cribriform glands with confluent growth pattern
  • Invasive morphology
  • Desmoplastic stromal response
  • Infiltration of the tumor capsule

Malignant characteristics on microscopy:

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of Ovary

Immunophenotype:

Molecular biology:

Mucinous Cystadenoma of Pancreas

  • Epithelium may form a single layer or papillary folds.
  • May show mitoses
  • Stroma is composed of small spindle-shaped cells

Immunohistochemistry[21]

Stroma is usually positive for:

Mucinous Cystadenoma of Appendix

Reference

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Hart WR, Norris HJ (May 1973). “Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary. Histologic criteria and clinical behavior”. Cancer. 31 (5): 1031–45. PMID 4735836.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ (June 1999). “Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 23 (6): 617–35. PMID 10366144.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Hoerl HD, Hart WR (December 1998). “Primary ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinomas: a clinicopathologic study of 49 cases with long-term follow-up”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 22 (12): 1449–62. PMID 9850171.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lee KR, Scully RE (November 2000). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with ‘pseudomyxoma peritonei“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 24 (11): 1447–64. PMID 11075847.
  5. Bladt O, De Man R, Aerts R (2004). “Mucinous cystadenoma of the ovary”. JBR-BTR. 87 (3): 118–9. PMID 15293671.
  6. 6.0 6.1 de Nictolis M, Montironi R, Tommasoni S, Valli M, Pisani E, Fabris G, Prat J (January 1994). “Benign, borderline, and well-differentiated malignant intestinal mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and nuclear quantitative study of 57 cases”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 13 (1): 10–21. PMID 8112952.
  7. Hart WR (January 2005). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a review”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 24 (1): 4–25. PMID 15626914.
  8. Ovary Epithelial tumors. Atlasgeneticsoncology (2016).http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Tumors/OvaryEpithTumID5230.html Accessed on February 29, 2016
  9. Klöppel G (February 2007). “Chronic pancreatitis, pseudotumors and other tumor-like lesions”. Mod. Pathol. 20 Suppl 1: S113–31. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800690. PMID 17486047.
  10. Basturk O, Hong SM, Wood LD, Adsay NV, Albores-Saavedra J, Biankin AV, Brosens LA, Fukushima N, Goggins M, Hruban RH, Kato Y, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G, Krasinskas A, Longnecker DS, Matthaei H, Offerhaus GJ, Shimizu M, Takaori K, Terris B, Yachida S, Esposito I, Furukawa T (December 2015). “A Revised Classification System and Recommendations From the Baltimore Consensus Meeting for Neoplastic Precursor Lesions in the Pancreas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39 (12): 1730–41. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000533. PMC 4646710. PMID 26559377.
  11. Bernard P, Scoazec JY, Joubert M, Kahn X, Le Borgne J, Berger F, Partensky C (November 2002). “Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: predictive criteria of malignancy according to pathological examination of 53 cases”. Arch Surg. 137 (11): 1274–8. PMID 12413317.
  12. Crippa S, Salvia R, Warshaw AL, Domínguez I, Bassi C, Falconi M, Thayer SP, Zamboni G, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Capelli P, Pederzoli P, Castillo CF (April 2008). “Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas is not an aggressive entity: lessons from 163 resected patients”. Ann. Surg. 247 (4): 571–9. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31811f4449. PMC 3806104. PMID 18362619.
  13. Baker ML, Seeley ES, Pai R, Suriawinata AA, Mino-Kenudson M, Zamboni G, Klöppel G, Longnecker DS (December 2012). “Invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas”. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 93 (3): 345–9. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.07.005. PMID 22902940.
  14. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  15. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  16. Carr NJ, Bibeau F, Bradley RF, Dartigues P, Feakins RM, Geisinger KR, Gui X, Isaac S, Milione M, Misdraji J, Pai RK, Rodriguez-Justo M, Sobin LH, van Velthuysen MF, Yantiss RK (December 2017). “The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Histopathology. 71 (6): 847–858. doi:10.1111/his.13324. PMID 28746986.
  17. Prayson RA, Hart WR, Petras RE (June 1994). “Pseudomyxoma peritonei. A clinicopathologic study of 19 cases with emphasis on site of origin and nature of associated ovarian tumors”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 18 (6): 591–603. PMID 8179074.
  18. Young RH, Gilks CB, Scully RE (May 1991). “Mucinous tumors of the appendix associated with mucinous tumors of the ovary and pseudomyxoma peritonei. A clinicopathological analysis of 22 cases supporting an origin in the appendix”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 15 (5): 415–29. PMID 2035736.
  19. McKenney JK, Soslow RA, Longacre TA (May 2008). “Ovarian mature teratomas with mucinous epithelial neoplasms: morphologic heterogeneity and association with pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 32 (5): 645–55. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815b486d. PMID 18344868.
  20. Ronnett BM, Seidman JD (May 2003). “Mucinous tumors arising in ovarian mature cystic teratomas: relationship to the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 27 (5): 650–7. PMID 12717249.
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Masia R, Mino-Kenudson M, Warshaw AL, Pitman MB, Misdraji J (February 2011). “Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm of the main pancreatic duct”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 135 (2): 264–7. doi:10.1043/1543-2165-135.2.264. PMID 21284448.
  22. Raijman I, Leong S, Hassaram S, Marcon NE (March 1994). “Appendiceal mucocele: endoscopic appearance”. Endoscopy. 26 (3): 326–8. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1008979. PMID 8076556.
  23. Mizuma N, Kabemura T, Akahoshi K, Yasuda D, Okabe H, Chijiiwa Y, Nawata H, Matsui N (December 1997). “Endosonographic features of mucocele of the appendix: report of a case”. Gastrointest. Endosc. 46 (6): 549–52. PMID 9434225.
  24. Rodríguez IM, Prat J (February 2002). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 75 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26 (2): 139–52. PMID 11812936.
  25. Vang R, Gown AM, Barry TS, Wheeler DT, Yemelyanova A, Seidman JD, Ronnett BM (September 2006). “Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary and secondary mucinous tumors of the ovary: analysis of coordinate immunohistochemical expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 cases”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 30 (9): 1130–9. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213281.43036.bb. PMID 16931958.
  26. Baker PM, Oliva E (January 2005). “Immunohistochemistry as a tool in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: an update”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 24 (1): 39–55. PMID 15626916.
  27. McCluggage WG (April 2006). “Immunohistochemical and functional biomarkers of value in female genital tract lesions”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 25 (2): 101–20. doi:10.1097/01.pgp.0000192269.14666.68. PMID 16633059.
  28. Vang R, Gown AM, Barry TS, Wheeler DT, Ronnett BM (January 2006). “Immunohistochemistry for estrogen and progesterone receptors in the distinction of primary and metastatic mucinous tumors in the ovary: an analysis of 124 cases”. Mod. Pathol. 19 (1): 97–105. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800510. PMID 16294196.
  29. Vang R, Gown AM, Wu LS, Barry TS, Wheeler DT, Yemelyanova A, Seidman JD, Ronnett BM (November 2006). “Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7”. Mod. Pathol. 19 (11): 1421–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800698. PMID 16980943.
  30. Vang R, Gown AM, Farinola M, Barry TS, Wheeler DT, Yemelyanova A, Seidman JD, Judson K, Ronnett BM (May 2007). “p16 expression in primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas in the ovary: utility for identification of metastatic HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 31 (5): 653–63. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213369.71676.25. PMID 17460447.
  31. Gemignani ML, Schlaerth AC, Bogomolniy F, Barakat RR, Lin O, Soslow R, Venkatraman E, Boyd J (August 2003). “Role of KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in mucinous ovarian carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol. 90 (2): 378–81. PMID 12893203.
  32. Mayr D, Hirschmann A, Löhrs U, Diebold J (December 2006). “KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors: a comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants”. Gynecol. Oncol. 103 (3): 883–7. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.029. PMID 16806438.
  33. Cuatrecasas M, Villanueva A, Matias-Guiu X, Prat J (April 1997). “K-ras mutations in mucinous ovarian tumors: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 95 cases”. Cancer. 79 (8): 1581–6. PMID 9118042.
  34. Kuo KT, Guan B, Feng Y, Mao TL, Chen X, Jinawath N, Wang Y, Kurman RJ, Shih I, Wang TL (May 2009). “Analysis of DNA copy number alterations in ovarian serous tumors identifies new molecular genetic changes in low-grade and high-grade carcinomas”. Cancer Res. 69 (9): 4036–42. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3913. PMC 2782554. PMID 19383911. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  35. Shi H, Wang MX, Caldwell CW (September 2007). “CpG islands: their potential as biomarkers for cancer”. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 7 (5): 519–31. doi:10.1586/14737159.7.5.519. PMID 17892361.
  36. Kurman RJ, Shih I (April 2008). “Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer: lessons from morphology and molecular biology and their clinical implications”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 27 (2): 151–60. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e318161e4f5. PMC 2794425. PMID 18317228. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  37. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  38. Carr NJ, Bibeau F, Bradley RF, Dartigues P, Feakins RM, Geisinger KR, Gui X, Isaac S, Milione M, Misdraji J, Pai RK, Rodriguez-Justo M, Sobin LH, van Velthuysen MF, Yantiss RK (December 2017). “The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Histopathology. 71 (6): 847–858. doi:10.1111/his.13324. PMID 28746986.
  39. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  40. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  41. Aho AJ, Heinonen R, Laurén P (1973). “Benign and malignant mucocele of the appendix. Histological types and prognosis”. Acta Chir Scand. 139 (4): 392–400. PMID 4718184.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mutations in the KRAS gene cause mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Causes

Reference

  1. Ovary Epithelial tumors. Atlasgeneticsoncology (2016).http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Tumors/OvaryEpithTumID5230.html Accessed on February 29, 2016
  2. Gemignani ML, Schlaerth AC, Bogomolniy F, Barakat RR, Lin O, Soslow R, Venkatraman E, Boyd J (August 2003). “Role of KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in mucinous ovarian carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol. 90 (2): 378–81. PMID 12893203.
  3. Mayr D, Hirschmann A, Löhrs U, Diebold J (December 2006). “KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors: a comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants”. Gynecol. Oncol. 103 (3): 883–7. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.029. PMID 16806438.
  4. Cuatrecasas M, Villanueva A, Matias-Guiu X, Prat J (April 1997). “K-ras mutations in mucinous ovarian tumors: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 95 cases”. Cancer. 79 (8): 1581–6. PMID 9118042.
  5. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ (January 2016). “A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 40 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID 26492181.
  6. Carr NJ, Bibeau F, Bradley RF, Dartigues P, Feakins RM, Geisinger KR, Gui X, Isaac S, Milione M, Misdraji J, Pai RK, Rodriguez-Justo M, Sobin LH, van Velthuysen MF, Yantiss RK (December 2017). “The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Histopathology. 71 (6): 847–858. doi:10.1111/his.13324. PMID 28746986.
Differentiating Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma must be differentiated from mucinous cystadenoma, serous cystadenoma, and pseudocyst.

Differentiating Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma from other Diseases

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of ovary

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of appendix

Mucinous

cystadenocarcinoma

of ovary

Clinical manifestations Para-clinical findings Gold standard
Sign and symptoms Physical

examination

Lab Findings Imaging Histopathology
US CT MRI
Mucinous

borderline

tumor

of the ovary

  • Asymptomatic initially
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Abdominal mass
  • Increased abdominal girth
  • Abdominal mass
  • Decreased Hb
  • Raised CEA
  • Localizes tumor
  • Demarcates the cancer
  • To visulaize the extent of the tumor
  • Large multiloculated cystic masses
  • mucus-containing cysts
  • Image guided biopsy and histopathological analysis
Metastatic

mucinous

carcinoma[4][5]

  • Ascities
  • Abdominal mass
  • Abdominal fullness
  • Early satiety
  • Fatigue
  • Bowel obstruction
  • Pleural effusion
  • Pelvic or abdominal pain
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Bloating
  • Urinary frequency
  • Increased abdominal girth
  • Abdominal mass
  • Ascities
  • Pallor
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Incresed CA-125
  • Decreased-Hb
  • Raised CEA
  • For the assessment for ascites and to the extent of cancer
  • Shows intra-abdominal spread
  • Shows distant metastasis and extent of the tumor
  • Mucinous differentiation
  • Tall columnar cells with apical mucin
  • Endocervical or intestinal-like appearance
  • Back-to-back cribriform glands with confluent growth pattern
  • Invasive morphology
  • Image-guided biopsy of patients with peritoneal metastasis and histopathological analysis
Mucinous

cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas

Symptoms Physical examination Lab Findings US CT MRI Histopathology Gold standard
Mucinous

cystadenoma

of pancreas[6][7][8][9][10]

  • Asymptomatic
  • Epigastric fullness
  • Abdominal mass
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Back pain
  • Epigastric mass
  • Abdominal fullness
  • Ascities
  • Pallor
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • CEA
  • CA 19-9
  • Hb
  • EUS for evaluation of the cyst wall, may show nodules within the cyst
  • To obtain aspiration of the cyst material
  • To perform biopsy
  • CT is important for differentiating MCN from other tumors
  • Shape is smooth
  • Main pancreatic duct is not dilated
  • MRI cross-sectional images may show unilocular or multilocular cyst with a solid component
  • peripheral calcification
  • wall thickening
  • Papillary structures
  • Hypervascular pattern
  • Solitary, multilocular or unilocular cysts with a fibrotic wall and containing mucin
  • Columnar epithelium lined mucin-producing cysts with different level of dysplasia
Biopsy and histopathology
Pancreatic

pseudocyst

  • Amylase levels raised (plasma or serum)
  • Lipase levels raised (plasma)
  • US may not be a good modality of diagnoses as pancreas lies behind the stomach (and so a gas-filled stomach will obscure the pancreas
  • CT scan is the gold standard for initial assessment and follow-up
  • To establish the relationship of the pseudocyst to the pancreatic ducts
  • collection of fluid containing pancreatic enzymes, hemolysed blood and necrotic debris around the pancreas
FNA and cytology
Serous cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas[11][12][13]
  • Abdominal/flank pain
  • Weight loss
  • Per-rectal bleeding
    • Palpable mass
    • Amylase levels raised (plasma or serum)
    • Lipase levels raised (plasma)
    • US localizes the mass and shows its extent
    • CT shows well-circumscribed, multilocular masses
    • Macrocysts appear well-circumscribed with lobulations
    • Microcysts are not very visible on CT and MRI is used to locate them
    • Too see features of the primary tumor
    • Local invasion
    • Metastatic lesions
    • Microcyts appear hyperintense
    • Multiple cysts
    • Cuboidal epithelium
    • Glycogen-rich cells
    • Serous fluid
    Biopsy and histopathology
    Mucinous

    cystadenocarcinoma of appendix

    Symptoms Physical examination Lab Findings US CT MRI Histopathology Gold standard
    Appendicitis

    Atypical symptoms include:

    • Constant pain in the right iliac fossa
    • Prolonged diarrhea
    • Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of appendicitis
    • Findings include:
      • Noncompressible, dilated appendix
      • Appendicolith Echogenic prominent
      • Pericaecal fat and periappeniceal fluid collection
    • CT scans are preferred over ultrasounds for diagnosing appendicitis
    • Increase in appendiceal lumen with the outer-wall-to-outer-wall transverse diameter greater than 6 mm
    • Appendiceal wall thickening (wall ≥ 3mm)
      • Appendiceal wall hyperenhancement
      • Mural stratification of the appendiceal wall
    • Magnetic resonance imaging has become the common technique for diagnosing appendicitis in children and pregnant patients
    • periappendiceal stranding appears as an increased fluid signal on the T2 weighted sequence (while it is reflected by fat stranding on a CT scan)
    Histopathological analysis
    Mesenteric

    cyst[2]

    • Asymptomatic
    • Acute or chronic abdominal pain
    • Smooth, round and mobile abdominal mass
    • Shows echogenic mass in appendix
    • CT scan are the best diagnostic tool
    • Provides significant information of the size and localization
    • Cystic masses associated with areas of fat necrosis and hemorrhage
    • Lymphangioma: endothelial lining
    • Enteric duplication cyst: Enteric lining and double-muscle lining with neural elements;
    • Enteric cyst: Enteric lining (mucosa with no muscle layer
    • Mesothelial cyst: mesothelial lining
    • Nonpancreatic pseudocyst has no lining, with a fibrous wall.
    Enucleation and Histopathological analysis

    References

    1. Ovary Epithelial tumors. Atlasgeneticsoncology (2016).http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Tumors/OvaryEpithTumID5230.html Accessed on February 29, 2016
    2. 2.0 2.1 Hamilton DL, Stormont JM (1989). “The volcano sign of appendiceal mucocele”. Gastrointest. Endosc. 35 (5): 453–6. PMID 2792684.
    3. Raijman I, Leong S, Hassaram S, Marcon NE (March 1994). “Appendiceal mucocele: endoscopic appearance”. Endoscopy. 26 (3): 326–8. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1008979. PMID 8076556.
    4. Hewitt MJ, Anderson K, Hall GD, Weston M, Hutson R, Wilkinson N, Perren TJ, Lane G, Spencer JA (January 2007). “Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: Efficacy of image-guided biopsy to determine site-specific diagnosis”. BJOG. 114 (1): 46–50. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x. PMID 17233859.
    5. Reid MD, Choi HJ, Memis B, Krasinskas AM, Jang KT, Akkas G, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Kooby DA, Basturk O, Adsay V (December 2015). “Serous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 193 Cases and Literature Review With New Insights on Macrocystic and Solid Variants and Critical Reappraisal of So-called “Serous Cystadenocarcinoma“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39 (12): 1597–610. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000559. PMID 26559376.
    6. Campbell F, Azadeh B (April 2008). “Cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas”. Histopathology. 52 (5): 539–51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02856.x. PMID 17903202.
    7. Garcea G, Ong SL, Rajesh A, Neal CP, Pollard CA, Berry DP, Dennison AR (2008). “Cystic lesions of the pancreas. A diagnostic and management dilemma”. Pancreatology. 8 (3): 236–51. doi:10.1159/000134279. PMID 18497542.
    8. Sarr MG, Carpenter HA, Prabhakar LP, Orchard TF, Hughes S, van Heerden JA, DiMagno EP (February 2000). “Clinical and pathologic correlation of 84 mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: can one reliably differentiate benign from malignant (or premalignant) neoplasms?”. Ann. Surg. 231 (2): 205–12. PMC 1420988. PMID 10674612.
    9. Zamboni G, Scarpa A, Bogina G, Iacono C, Bassi C, Talamini G, Sessa F, Capella C, Solcia E, Rickaert F, Mariuzzi GM, Klöppel G (April 1999). “Mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathological features, prognosis, and relationship to other mucinous cystic tumors”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 23 (4): 410–22. PMID 10199470.
    10. Testini M, Gurrado A, Lissidini G, Venezia P, Greco L, Piccinni G (December 2010). “Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas”. World J. Gastroenterol. 16 (45): 5682–92. PMC 2997983. PMID 21128317.
    11. Huh J, Byun JH, Hong SM, Kim KW, Kim JH, Lee SS, Kim HJ, Lee MG (August 2016). “Malignant pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms: systematic review with a new case”. BMC Gastroenterol. 16 (1): 97. doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0518-0. PMC 4994257. PMID 27549181.
    12. Reid MD, Choi HJ, Memis B, Krasinskas AM, Jang KT, Akkas G, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Kooby DA, Basturk O, Adsay V (December 2015). “Serous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 193 Cases and Literature Review With New Insights on Macrocystic and Solid Variants and Critical Reappraisal of So-called “Serous Cystadenocarcinoma“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39 (12): 1597–610. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000559. PMID 26559376.
    13. Reid MD, Choi HJ, Memis B, Krasinskas AM, Jang KT, Akkas G, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Kooby DA, Basturk O, Adsay V (December 2015). “Serous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 193 Cases and Literature Review With New Insights on Macrocystic and Solid Variants and Critical Reappraisal of So-called “Serous Cystadenocarcinoma“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39 (12): 1597–610. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000559. PMID 26559376.
    14. Yelon, Jay A. & Luchette, Fred A. (2014), Geriatric Trauma and Critical Care (1st ed.), New York, New York: Springer

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Epidemiology and Demographics


    For patient information, click here

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

    Overview

    Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma commonly affects individuals older than forty years of age. Females are more commonly affected with mucinous cystadenoma of pancreas than males.

    Epidemiology and Demographics

    Incidence

    Mucinous cystadenoma of ovary

    Mucinous cystadenoma of pancreas

    • Mostly in perimenopausal women in late 40s to early 50s.[7]
    • More common in females than males.

    Mucinous cystadenoma of appendix

    References

    1. 1.0 1.1 Hart WR, Norris HJ (May 1973). “Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary. Histologic criteria and clinical behavior”. Cancer. 31 (5): 1031–45. PMID 4735836.
    2. Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ (June 1999). “Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 23 (6): 617–35. PMID 10366144.
    3. Hoerl HD, Hart WR (December 1998). “Primary ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinomas: a clinicopathologic study of 49 cases with long-term follow-up”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 22 (12): 1449–62. PMID 9850171.
    4. Bladt O, De Man R, Aerts R (2004). “Mucinous cystadenoma of the ovary”. JBR-BTR. 87 (3): 118–9. PMID 15293671.
    5. de Nictolis M, Montironi R, Tommasoni S, Valli M, Pisani E, Fabris G, Prat J (January 1994). “Benign, borderline, and well-differentiated malignant intestinal mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and nuclear quantitative study of 57 cases”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 13 (1): 10–21. PMID 8112952.
    6. Hart WR (January 2005). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a review”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 24 (1): 4–25. PMID 15626914.
    7. Lee KR, Scully RE (November 2000). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with ‘pseudomyxoma peritonei“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 24 (11): 1447–64. PMID 11075847.
    8. Choudry HA, Pai RK (August 2018). “Management of Mucinous Appendiceal Tumors”. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25 (8): 2135–2144. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6488-4. PMID 29717422.
    9. Aho AJ, Heinonen R, Laurén P (1973). “Benign and malignant mucocele of the appendix. Histological types and prognosis”. Acta Chir Scand. 139 (4): 392–400. PMID 4718184.
    10. Landen S, Bertrand C, Maddern GJ, Herman D, Pourbaix A, de Neve A, Schmitz A (November 1992). “Appendiceal mucoceles and pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 175 (5): 401–4. PMID 1440166.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Risk Factors

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

    Overview

    Common risk factors in the development of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma are obesity and post menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy and genetic predilection.

    Risk Factors

    Common risk factors of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include the following:[1]

    References

    1. Lee KR, Scully RE (November 2000). “Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with ‘pseudomyxoma peritonei“. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 24 (11): 1447–64. PMID 11075847.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qurrat-ul-ain Abid, M.D.[2], Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

    Overview

    If left untreated, most of the patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma may be confined to the organ itself. Common complications of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma include metastasis and inguinal hernia. The presence of metastasis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

    Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

    Natural History

    Complications

    Prognosis

    References

    1. Guruprasad, Bhat (2012). “Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of ovary: Changing treatment paradigms”. World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1 (4): 42. doi:10.5317/wjog.v1.i4.42. ISSN 2218-6220.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Diagnosis

    Diagnosis

    Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Biopsy

    Treatment

    Treatment

    Medical Therapy | Surgery | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

    Case Studies

    Case Studies

    Case #1


    Template:WH Template:WS

    Looking for the patient version?

    Back to the patient-friendly article

    © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH