Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Endometriosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Endometrioma, Chocolate cyst of the ovary, Endometrosis

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Endometriosis is a disease characterized by the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. The most commonly affected sites are the ovaries, broad ligaments, and the surrounding pelvic structures. Endometriosis can also affect distant sites such as the lungs, ureters, and CNS. The exact pathogenesis of endometriosis has not been established, although several theories have been put forth. The Sampson theory of retrograde menstruation, the coelomic metaplasia theory, and the lymphatic and vascular dissemination theory offer possible explanations for the mechanisms of implantation and invasion of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis is a cause of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia; accordingly, it must be differentiated from other conditions presenting with similar symptoms such as adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic congestion syndrome, and submucosal uterine fibroids. The goal of medical therapy is pain management and the reduction of the endometrial implant size. Therapeutic options include GnRH agonists and danazol. Surgical therapy is reserved for patients with severe forms of the disease or who fail to improve with standard medical therapy.

Historical Perspective

In the early 19th century, endometriosis was described as adenomyomas. In the 1920s, endometriosis was differentiated from adenomyosis and a detailed description of the disease was given by Cullen and Sampson. Sampson proposed the theory of retrograde menstruation as the pathogenesis of the disease.

Classification

Endometriosis is classified into four stages of severity based on the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine scoring system. The staging is based on the distribution of the lesions and the presence of adhesions.

Pathophysiology

The exact pathogenesis of endometriosis is not clear and several theories have made an attempt to describe its pathogenesis. The Sampson theory of retrograde menstruation, the coelomic metaplasia theory, and the lymphatic and vascular dissemination theory explain the implantation and invasion of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Immunologic factors and genetic factors are also thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Causes

The exact cause of endometriosis is unknown; the disease is thought to be multifactorial in origin.

Differential Diagnosis

Endometriosis is a cause of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Endometriosis must be differentiated from other conditions presenting with similar symptoms such as adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic congestion syndrome, and submucosal uterine fibroids.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Endometriosis affects approximately around 11% of the female population in the reproductive age group. Endometriosis is more common among Caucasians than among African Americans. The disease accounts for the majority of patients with chronic pelvic pain and infertility.

Risk Factors

The risk factors predisposing women to the development of endometriosis include early age at menarche, nulliparity, positive family history, and the presence of congenital cervical stenosis or obstructive lesions in the uterovaginal tract.

Screening

Standard screening for endometriosis is not recommended.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Endometriosis is a condition affecting females in the reproductive age group. It has a wide spectrum of presentations. It can be asymptomatic, present with premenstrual spotting and cyclic abdominal pain, present with infertility or chronic pelvic pain, or present as deep endometriosis with dyspareunia, dyschezia, and cyclic rectal bleeding. Complications of endometriosis include infertility, fibrosis, chocolate cyst, and, rarely, effects on other organs such as the lungs.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Endometriosis is a condition affecting women in the reproductive age group. The patients with endometriosis may have positive family history, presence of congenital cervical stenosis or obstructive lesions in the uterovaginal tract The presenting features include cyclical abdominal pain, dysmenorrhea, pain with passing stools, and pain with intercourse.

Physical Examination

Examination findings on digital vaginal examination and speculum examination include a fixed retroverted uterus, palpable nodularity of the uterosacral ligaments, and cul-de-sac with narrowing of the posterior fornix.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings associated with endometriosis include features of iron deficiency anemia and increased levels of cancer antigen-125 and interleukin 1.

EKG

There are no specific EKG findings associated with endometriosis.

Chest X-Ray

On chest X-ray, chest endometriosis is characterized by small bubbles at the level of the right diaphragm associated with pneumothorax.

CT

CT of endometriosis is not the most sensitive noninvasive method for the diagnosis; MRI is more useful. On CT scans, endometriosis shows catamenial pneumothorax, hemothorax, and lung nodules.

MRI

MRI is useful for the assessment of the anatomical locations and severity of the disease. The typical appearance of endometriosis includes a characteristic hyperintensity on T1-weighted images and a hypointensity on T2-weighted images.

Ultrasound

Abdominal ultrasound is useful to differentiate endometriosis from other cystic lesions of female reproductive system. The endometrial lesions have increased vascularity and will demonstrate increased Doppler flow. Transvaginal ultrasound is more sensitive than abdominal ultrasound.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no associated other imaging findings with endometriosis.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Diagnostic laparoscopy is the gold standard to assess the severity and extent of the disease.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The primary goal of medical therapy is pain management and regression of the endometrial lesions. NSAIDS are useful for pain management. There are many therapeutic options available to reduce the size of endometrial lesions. Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists and danazol are widely used. Continuous oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use is also helpful in patients with mild to moderate endometriosis.

Surgical Therapy

Patients with failed medical therapy and patients with stage 3 or stage 4 disease are candidates for surgical therapy. Laser and excision are done for isolated lesions, while total hysterectomy is reserved for patients with extensive disease.

Primary Prevention

There are no primary preventive measures for endometriosis.

Secondary Prevention

There are no secondary preventive measures for endometriosis.

References

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Endometriosis was described in the early 19th century as adenomyoma. In the late 19th century, Sampson proposed the theory of retrograde menstruation as the pathogenesis of the endometriosis. In the 1920s, endometriosis was differentiated from adenomyosis and a detailed description of the disease was given by Cullen and Sampson.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Benagiano G, Brosens I, Lippi D (2014). “The history of endometriosis”. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 78 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1159/000358919. PMID 24853333.
  2. Adamson, G. David; Pasta, David J. (2010). “Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system”. Fertility and Sterility. 94 (5): 1609–1615. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.035. ISSN 0015-0282.
Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Endometriosis is classified into four stages of severity based on the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine scoring system. The staging is based on the distribution of the lesions and the presence of adhesions.

Classification

revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine scoring system (rASRM):[1]

  • Stage I:
  • Stage II:
  • Stage III:
    • Moderate disease characterized by the presence of multiple implants
    • Includes both superficial and deeply invasive lesions
    • Peritubal and periovarian adhesions may be evident
  • Stage IV:
    • Severe disease characterized by multiple superficial and deep implants
    • Large ovarian endometriomas
    • Dense adhesions present

Anatomical (Phenotype-based) Classification:

Endometriosis is classified based on anatomical phenotype (subtype) rather than disease stage. It is categorized into four subtypes:

  • Superficial peritoneal endometriosis
  • Deep endometriosis
  • Ovarian endometriomas
  • Extrapelvic endometriosis

Subtypes may occur alone or in combination and are clinically important because they influence diagnostic evaluation and treatment approach.

The prevalence of individual subtypes in the general population is unknown.

1. Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis

Superficial peritoneal endometriosis consists of lesions located on the peritoneal surface or serosa of abdominal or pelvic viscera.

Lesions may vary in appearance and may be blue, brown, red, white, or clear.

Superficial peritoneal lesions are often difficult to detect with imaging. Transvaginal ultrasound has low sensitivity for superficial peritoneal disease (65%, 95% CI, 27%–100%).[2]

2. Deep Endometriosis

Deep endometriosis refers to lesions that penetrate beneath the peritoneal surface or infiltrate the muscularis propria of pelvic organs such as the bowel, bladder, or ureter.

These lesions commonly involve the uterosacral ligaments and rectosigmoid colon and may present as nodular lesions with associated fibrosis and adhesions.

Pain severity does not generally correlate with lesion number, location, or subtype; however, deep disease in the posterior cul-de-sac correlates with dyspareunia.[3][4]

Transvaginal ultrasound has moderate sensitivity for detecting deep endometriosis (79%, 95% CI, 69%–89%).[2]

Magnetic resonance imaging using an endometriosis-specific protocol has reported sensitivity of 91%–93.5% and specificity of 86%–87.5% for deep and ovarian endometriosis when compared with laparoscopy or other imaging modalities.[5]

3. Ovarian Endometriomas

Ovarian endometriomas are cystic lesions within the ovary lined by endometrial glands and stroma. They characteristically contain dark, blood-stained fluid and are sometimes referred to as “chocolate cysts.”

Transvaginal ultrasound has high diagnostic accuracy for ovarian endometriomas, with sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 87%–99%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI, 92%–99%).[2]

MRI similarly demonstrates high sensitivity (91%–93.5%) and specificity (86%–87.5%) for ovarian endometriosis.[5]

4. Extrapelvic Endometriosis

Extrapelvic endometriosis refers to lesions occurring outside of the pelvis. Lesions have been reported in nearly every organ system, including:

  • Diaphragm
  • Thoracic cavity
  • Abdominal wall
  • Brain[6]

Clinical manifestations depend on lesion location and may include catamenial pneumothorax, hemoptysis, shoulder pain during menses, or cyclic pain in abdominal wall nodules.[6]

Clinical Relevance of Subtype Classification

Although classification by subtype assists in determining imaging strategy and surgical planning, lesion subtype does not reliably predict pain severity. With the exception of deep posterior cul-de-sac disease and dyspareunia, pain intensity does not correlate with lesion number, location, or subtype.[3][4]

References

  1. Adamson GD (2011). “Endometriosis classification: an update”. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 23 (4): 213–20. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a3ba. PMID 21666464.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009591. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2
  3. 3.0 3.1 Pashkunova D, Darici E, Senft B, et al. Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis: correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(9):1764-1770. doi:10.1111/aogs.14921
  4. 4.0 4.1 Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):266-271. doi:10.1093/humrep/del339
  5. 5.0 5.1 Avery JC, Knox S, Deslandes A, et al; Imagendo Study Group. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis, 2: a systematic review of recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine and computed tomography. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(2):189-211. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017
  6. 6.0 6.1 AndresMP, Arcoverde FVL, Souza CCC, Fernandes LFC, Abrão MS, Kho RM. Extrapelvic endometriosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):373-389. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.004
Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

The exact pathogenesis of endometriosis is not clear; several theories have been set forth. The Sampson theory of retrograde menstruation, the coelomic metaplasia theory, and the lymphatic and vascular dissemination theory explain the implantation and invasion of the endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Immunologic factors and genetic factors are also thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

The exact pathogenesis of endometriosis remains incompletely understood. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the presence of viable, hormonally responsive <u>endometrial tissue</u> outside the uterine cavity.[1][2][3][4][5]

Translocation of Endometrial Cells

Sampson’s Theory of Retrograde Menstruation

Sampson’s theory proposes that viable endometrial tissue passes in a retrograde fashion through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneal cavity during menstruation, where it implants onto pelvic structures and organs.[1]

Clinical observations supporting this theory include the increased risk of endometriosis in patients with cervical stenosis and congenital outflow obstruction, conditions that increase retrograde menstrual efflux and facilitate peritoneal implantation.

However, retrograde menstruation alone does not fully explain the occurrence of endometriosis in premenarcheal girls or rare cases identified in newborns.[6]

Lymphatic and Vascular Dissemination

Endometrial cells may also disseminate via lymphatic or hematogenous pathways, which may account for lesions identified at distant or extrapelvic sites.

Stem Cell Theory

Experimental evidence suggests that endometrial stem cells from the basalis layer and bone marrow–derived stem cells may migrate via retrograde, lymphatic, or hematogenous routes, contributing to the development of ectopic lesions.

Implantation and Survival of Ectopic Endometrial Cells

The mere presence of endometrial cells outside the uterine cavity does not constitute endometriosis. Translocated cells must adhere to surrounding tissues, evade immune surveillance, survive, and respond to estrogen stimulation.

Factors facilitating implantation and survival include:

  • Endometrial stromal cells, which are essential for tissue adhesion
  • Resistance of ectopic cells to cell-mediated immunity
  • Increased proliferative capacity
  • Increased aromatase expression leading to elevated local estrogen concentrations
  • Aberrant integrin expression enhancing attachment and invasion

Invasion and Growth

Endometrial glandular cells contribute to tissue invasion.[7]

Degradation of the extracellular matrix due to increased proteolytic activity allows invasion and establishment of lesions. Matrix metalloproteinases and plasmin facilitate extracellular matrix breakdown and lesion expansion.

Hormonal Dependence and Proliferation

The eutopic endometrium proliferates in response to estrogen. Estrogen production depends on aromatase activity, which catalyzes the conversion of ovarian androstenedione into estrone.[8]

Ectopic endometrial tissue demonstrates increased aromatase expression, resulting in elevated local estrogen levels and enhanced proliferation.

Additionally, endometriotic tissue exhibits progesterone resistance, impairing normal regulation of estrogen-driven proliferation. Progesterone resistance contributes to persistent lesion growth and survival.

Reduction of excess estrogen stimulation and correction of progesterone resistance form the basis of medical therapy.

Immune Dysregulation and Peritoneal Inflammation

Pathophysiological changes extend beyond the ectopic lesions themselves. Endometriosis is associated with immune dysregulation and increased inflammatory activity within the pelvic environment.[9][10][11]

Alterations include:

  • Increased inflammation and angiogenesis within mesothelial cells of the pelvic peritoneum
  • Recruitment of immune cells
  • Sustained production of proinflammatory cytokines
  • Altered immune responsiveness within the uterine endometrium

These immune abnormalities contribute to lesion persistence and chronic inflammation.[9][10][11]

Neuroangiogenesis

Endometriosis lesions demonstrate coordinated neurogenesis and neovascularization.[9][10][11]

New nerve fiber growth toward lesions and new blood vessel formation support lesion survival and contribute to pain generation.

The interaction between inflammatory mediators, immune cells, and sensory nerves sustains a self-perpetuating inflammatory microenvironment.

Pain Mechanisms

Pelvic pain in endometriosis is multifactorial and may involve a combination of nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic mechanisms.[12][13]

Nociceptive Pain

Nociceptive pain results from activation of peripheral nociceptors due to localized inflammation surrounding lesions.[12]

Lesions release proinflammatory cytokines and pain mediators that stimulate and amplify nociceptive signaling.

Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain may result from:

  • Peripheral sensitization
  • Direct nerve fiber infiltration by lesions
  • Injury to nerves during surgical intervention[12]


Lesions may rarely involve nerves such as the pudendal, obturator, or sciatic nerve.[12]

Pelvic organ cross-sensitization may occur when neuronal activity in one pelvic organ sensitizes adjacent organs through shared spinal pathways.[12]


Nociplastic Pain and Central Sensitization

Nociplastic pain refers to altered pain processing within the central nervous system.[12][13]

It manifests as:

  • Widespread body pain
  • Fatigue
  • Memory difficulties
  • Sleep disturbances[13]


Immune activation surrounding lesions may alter systemic immune signaling, contributing to central sensitization within the spinal cord and brain.[12][13]

This leads to:

  • Amplification of ascending pain signals
  • Loss of descending pain inhibition
  • Generalized sensory hypersensitivity


Nociplastic pain may explain why:

  • Lesion number and subtype are weakly associated with pain severity[14][15]
  • Surgical removal of lesions does not alleviate pain in all patients
  • Pain may recur without evidence of recurrent lesions[12][13]

Neuroendocrine Contribution

Compromised function of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and sympathetic-adrenal medullary systems may further amplify immune dysregulation and pain signaling.[12][13]

Mechanisms of Infertility

Endometriosis may impair fertility through multiple mechanisms, including:

  • Impaired ovarian function
  • Adhesions causing tubal obstruction
  • Dysfunction of the uterine endometrium[11]

These mechanisms reflect both structural distortion and molecular alterations in the reproductive environment.

Commonly Affected Sites

Endometriosis most commonly affects dependent areas of the pelvis, with the ovaries being the most frequent site.[16]

Other commonly affected sites include:

  • Pelvic peritoneum lining the uterus
  • Posterior cul-de-sac
  • Round and broad ligaments of the uterus
  • Lymph nodes

Less common sites include:

Genetics and Immune Factors

Genetic predisposition contributes to disease susceptibility. Polymorphisms in genes involved in cell-mediated immunity and aromatase activity have been described in women with endometriosis.[22][23]

Polymorphisms in genes encoding <cytokines and toll-like receptors have also been associated with increased risk.

A positive family history of endometriosis in a first-degree relative is associated with approximately a six-fold increased risk of developing the disease.

Associated Conditions

Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.[24][25]

Gross Pathology

The gross appearance of lesions depends on location, duration, menstrual cycle phase, and degree of fibrosis.

On laparoscopy, pelvic endometriosis may appear as raised, dark, non-hemorrhagic lesions. Lesions may also appear brown, black, white, yellow, pink, or clear depending on vascularity and hemorrhagic content.

Ovarian endometriosis may present as a cyst containing dark, thick, hemolyzed blood, commonly referred to as a “chocolate cyst.”

Advanced disease may result in fibrosis and pelvic adhesions visible during laparoscopy.

Microscopic Pathology

Histologic examination demonstrates the presence of endometrial glandular epithelium and endometrial stromal cells within ectopic sites.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Bulun, Serdar E. (2009). “Endometriosis”. New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (3): 268–279. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804690. ISSN 0028-4793.
  2. Greene AD, Lang SA, Kendziorski JA, Sroga-Rios JM, Herzog TJ, Burns KA (2016). “Endometriosis: where are we and where are we going?”. Reproduction. 152 (3): R63–78. doi:10.1530/REP-16-0052. PMC 4958554. PMID 27165051.
  3. Nothnick W, Alali Z (2016). “Recent advances in the understanding of endometriosis: the role of inflammatory mediators in disease pathogenesis and treatment”. F1000Res. 5. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7504.1. PMC 4760268. PMID 26949527.
  4. Begum T, Chowdhury SR (2013). “Aetiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis – a review”. Mymensingh Med J. 22 (1): 218–21. PMID 23416836.
  5. Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I (2012). “The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update”. Fertil Steril. 98 (3): 572–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.044. PMID 22819188.
  6. Templeman C (2009). “Adolescent endometriosis”. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 36 (1): 177–85. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2008.12.005. PMID 19344855.
  7. Smarr MM, Kannan K, Buck Louis GM (2016). “Endocrine disrupting chemicals and endometriosis”. Fertil Steril. 106 (4): 959–66. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.034. PMID 27424048.
  8. Patel S (2017). “Disruption of aromatase homeostasis as the cause of a multiplicity of ailments: A comprehensive review”. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 168: 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.01.009. PMID 28109841.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. 2021;184(11):2807-2824. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.041
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244-1256. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1810764
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ. 2022;379:e070750. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070750
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 Coxon L, Demetriou L, Vincent K. Current developments in endometriosis-associated pain. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(10):101769. doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101769
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Kaplan CM, Kelleher E, Irani A, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ, Harte SE. Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(6):347-363. doi:10.1038/s41582-024-00966-8
  14. Pashkunova D, Darici E, Senft B, et al. Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis: correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(9):1764-1770. doi:10.1111/aogs.14921
  15. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):266-271. doi:10.1093/humrep/del339
  16. Fritel X (2007). “[Endometriosis anatomoclinical entities]”. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 36 (2): 113–8. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2006.12.003. PMID 17275210.
  17. Park HM, Lee SS, Eom DW, Kang GH, Yi SW, Sohn WS (2009). “Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a case report”. J Korean Med Sci. 24 (4): 767–71. doi:10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.767. PMC 2719211. PMID 19654969.
  18. Hernández-Ramírez DA, Cravioto-Villanueva A, Barragan-Rincón A (2008). “[Rectal endometriosis: entity difficult to diagnose.]”. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 73 (3): 159–62. PMID 19671503.
  19. Collins AM, Power KT, Gaughan B, Hill AD, Kneafsey B (2009). “Abdominal wall reconstruction for a large caesarean scar endometrioma”. Surgeon. 7 (4): 252–3. PMID 19736896.
  20. Chung MK, Jarnagin B (2009). “Early identification of interstitial cystitis may avoid unnecessary hysterectomy”. JSLS. 13 (3): 350–7. PMC 3015962. PMID 19793476.
  21. Dirim A, Celikkaya S, Aygun C, Caylak B (2009). “Renal endometriosis presenting with a giant subcapsular hematoma: case report”. Fertil Steril. 92 (1): 391.e5–7. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.013. PMID 19476941.
  22. Fan W, Huang Z, Xiao Z, Li S, Ma Q (2016). “The cytochrome P4501A1 gene polymorphisms and endometriosis: a meta-analysis”. J Assist Reprod Genet. 33 (10): 1373–1383. doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0783-4. PMC 5065559. PMID 27525656.
  23. Blakemore J, Naftolin F (2016). “Aromatase: Contributions to Physiology and Disease in Women and Men”. Physiology (Bethesda). 31 (4): 258–69. doi:10.1152/physiol.00054.2015. PMID 27252161.
  24. Thomsen LH, Schnack TH, Buchardi K, Hummelshoj L, Missmer SA, Forman A; et al. (2017). “Risk factors of epithelial ovarian carcinomas among women with endometriosis: a systematic review”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 96 (6): 761–778. doi:10.1111/aogs.13010. PMID 27565819.
  25. Lassus H, Pasanen A, Bützow R (2015). “[Is endometriosis a premalignant condition to ovarian carcinoma?]”. Duodecim. 131 (19): 1777–84. PMID 26638662.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]

Causes

The exact cause of endometriosis remains incompletely understood. Current evidence suggests that endometriosis results from a combination of retrograde menstruation, genetic predisposition, hormonal influences, and immune dysregulation.

Retrograde Menstruation and Lesion Formation

Retrograde efflux of endometrial cells through the fallopian tubes into the pelvic cavity during menstruation is widely accepted as a contributor to the origin of endometriosis lesions within the abdominal–pelvic cavity.[1][2][3]

Lymphatic or vascular dissemination has also been proposed and cannot be excluded as a mechanism contributing to extrapelvic lesions.[1][2][3]

However, retrograde menstruation alone does not fully explain why only a subset of individuals develop clinically significant disease.

Genetic Predisposition

Twin studies estimate the heritability of endometriosis to be approximately 50%.[4][5]

A family history of endometriosis is a significant risk factor. Among sisters of affected individuals, the relative risk is 5.2 (95% CI, 3.4–7.2).[6]

Although heritability appears substantial, no single gene has been identified as responsible for the majority of familial cases.[4][5][6]

Early Menarche

Earlier onset of menstruation is associated with increased risk.

Menarche before age 12 years is associated with increased risk of endometriosis.[7]

This may increase cumulative lifetime exposure to retrograde menstrual efflux.

Short Menstrual Cycle Length

Shorter menstrual cycles (<28 days) are associated with increased risk.[8]

More frequent menses may increase the frequency of retrograde efflux and implantation events.

Low Body Mass Index

Lower body mass index has been associated with increased risk of endometriosis.[9]

The mechanism underlying this association remains unclear but may involve hormonal or inflammatory factors.

Nulliparity

Nulliparity is associated with increased risk of endometriosis.[10]

The protective mechanism of pregnancy may involve prolonged anovulation and suppression of menstruation.

Obstructive Müllerian Anomalies

Obstructive Müllerian anomalies are strongly associated with endometriosis.

In individuals with uterine anomalies causing blockage of menstrual outflow, the prevalence of endometriosis is reported as 47% (95% CI, 36%–58%).[11]

Obstruction likely increases retrograde menstrual efflux and promotes implantation of endometrial tissue within the pelvis.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. 2021;184(11):2807-2824. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.041
  2. 2.0 2.1 Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244-1256. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1810764
  3. 3.0 3.1 Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ. 2022;379:e070750. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070750
  4. 4.0 4.1 Saha R, Pettersson HJ, Svedberg P, et al. Heritability of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104 (4):947-952. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.035
  5. 5.0 5.1 Treloar SA, O’Connor DT, O’Connor VM, Martin NG. Genetic influences on endometriosis in an Australian twin sample. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(4):701-710. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00540-8
  6. 6.0 6.1 Stefansson H, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17 (3):555-559. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.3.555
  7. LuMY, Niu JL, Liu B. The risk of endometriosis by early menarche is recently increased: ameta-analysis of literature published from 2000 to 2020. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):59-69. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06541-0
  8. Wei M, Cheng Y, Bu H, Zhao Y, ZhaoW. Length of menstrual cycle and risk of endometriosis: ameta-analysis of 11 case-control studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(9):e2922. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002922
  9. Liu Y, ZhangW. Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: ameta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):46928-46936. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14916
  10. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, et al. Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104 (5 Pt 1):965-974. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000142714.54857.f8
  11. Vercellini P, Salmeri N, Somigliana E, et al. Müllerian anomalies and endometriosis as potential explanatory models for the retrograde menstruation/implantation and the embryonic remnants/celomic metaplasia pathogenic theories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2024;39(7):1460-1470. doi:10.1093/humrep/deae086
Differentiating Endometriosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Endometriosis commonly presents with dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and deep dyspareunia. It must be differentiated from other gynecologic and nongynecologic conditions that present with pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, or abnormal uterine bleeding.

Importantly:

  • Pain severity does not reliably correlate with lesion burden, number, or subtype (except deep posterior cul-de-sac disease, which correlates with dyspareunia).[1][2]
  • Normal imaging does not exclude endometriosis
  • Response to hormonal therapy does not confirm the diagnosis

Differential Diagnosis

Endometriosis may present with:

  • Dysmenorrhea
  • Deep dyspareunia
  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Infertility
  • Dyschezia
  • Dysuria
  • Abnormal uterine bleeding

Differential diagnosis should consider both gynecologic and nongynecologic causes.

Differentiating Endometriosis from Other Gynecological Conditions:

Clinical Features Physical Examination Diagnostic Findings
  • Nodularity in posterior fornix
  • Adnexal masses (endometrioma)
  • Fixed retroverted uterus
  • Decreased uterine mobility
  • Tenderness of posterior cul-de-sac
  • Lateral displacement of cervix


  • Transvaginal ultrasound has high sensitivity for ovarian endometriomas, moderate sensitivity for deep infiltrating disease, and low sensitivity for superficial peritoneal lesions.[3]
  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves detection of deep and ovarian disease.[4]
  • CA-125 may be elevated but is nonspecific.  
  • Absence of imaging findings does not exclude endometriosis.  
  • Laparoscopic visualization with histologic confirmation is diagnostic.
  • Features Suggesting Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: • Cyclic hematochezia   • Hematuria during menses   • Severe dyschezia   • Bowel obstruction   • Hydroureter   These findings should raise suspicion for deep endometriosis.[5][6]
  • Heavy menstrual bleeding
  • Dysmenorrhea
  • Common in women 40–50 years
  • Diffusely enlarged, tender uterus

Submucous uterine leiomyomas[8]

  • Menorrhagia
  • Pelvic pressure
  • Infertility
  • Peak age 25–44
  • Enlarged irregular mobile uterus
  • Transvaginal ultrasound shows myomas
  • History of sexually transmitted infection
  • Multiple sexual partners
  • Fever
  • Acute pelvic pain
  • Cervical motion tenderness
  • Uterine/adnexal tenderness
  • Purulent discharge

Pelvic congestion syndrome[10]

  • Chronic pelvic heaviness
  • Deep dyspareunia
  • Post-coital pain
  • Pain worse after prolonged standing
  • Pain worse at the end of the day

Nongynecologic Conditions With Overlapping Symptoms

These conditions frequently mimic endometriosis:

Clinical Features

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

  • Altered bowel frequency
  • Abdominal pain
  • Symptoms may worsen during menses

Bladder Pain Syndrome / Interstitial Cystitis

  • Urinary urgency
  • Frequency
  • Nocturia
  • Normal urinalysis

Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain

  • Pain worsened by activity
  • Pelvic floor muscle tenderness
  • Trigger points on examination

Differentiating Endometriosis on the Basis of Acute Lower Abdominal Pain

In young women presenting with acute severe lower abdominal pain, the following conditions should be considered:

Disease Findings
  • Missed menses
  • Positive pregnancy test
  • Ultrasound shows empty uterus ± adnexal mass
  • Right lower quadrant pain
  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Ultrasound sensitivity 75–90%
  • Sudden onset pain
  • May follow trauma
  • Ultrasound diagnostic
  • Acute unilateral lower quadrant pain
  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Tender adnexal mass
  • Ultrasound diagnostic

Hemorrhagic ovarian cyst[14]

  • Localized abdominal pain
  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Possible hypovolemia
  • Ultrasound diagnostic
  • Urinary frequency
  • Urgency
  • Dysuria
  • Suprapubic pain
  • Cyclic pelvic pain
  • Worsening during menses
  • Deep dyspareunia
  • Laparoscopic visualization confirms diagnosis

References

  1. Pashkunova D, Darici E, Senft B, et al. Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis: correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.2024;103(9):1764-1770. doi:10.1111/aogs.14921
  2. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):266-271. doi:10.1093/humrep/del339
  3. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009591. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2
  4. Avery JC, Knox S, Deslandes A, et al; Imagendo Study Group. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis, 2: a systematic review of recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine and computed tomography. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(2):189-211. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017
  5. Mușat F, Păduraru DN, Bolocan A, Constantinescu A, Ion D, Andronic O. Endometriosis as an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction—a comprehensive literature review. J Clin Med.2023;12(19):6376. doi:10.3390/jcm12196376
  6. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P. Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation. EurUrol. 2017;71(5):790-807. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015
  7. Parker JD, Leondires M, Sinaii N, Premkumar A, Nieman LK, Stratton P (2006). “Persistence of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pain after optimal endometriosis surgery may indicate adenomyosis”. Fertil Steril. 86 (3): 711–5. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.030. PMID 16782099.
  8. Donnez J, Donnez O, Matule D, Ahrendt HJ, Hudecek R, Zatik J; et al. (2016). “Long-term medical management of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate”. Fertil Steril. 105 (1): 165–173.e4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.032. PMID 26477496.
  9. Ross J, Judlin P, Jensen J, International Union against sexually transmitted infections (2014). “2012 European guideline for the management of pelvic inflammatory disease”. Int J STD AIDS. 25 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1177/0956462413498714. PMID 24216035.
  10. Rozenblit AM, Ricci ZJ, Tuvia J, Amis ES (2001). “Incompetent and dilated ovarian veins: a common CT finding in asymptomatic parous women”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176 (1): 119–22. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760119. PMID 11133549.
  11. Morin L, Cargill YM, Glanc P (2016). “Ultrasound Evaluation of First Trimester Complications of Pregnancy”. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 38 (10): 982–988. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2016.06.001. PMID 27720100.
  12. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994). “Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients”. Radiology. 190 (1): 31–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259423. PMID 8259423.
  13. Bottomley C, Bourne T (2009). “Diagnosis and management of ovarian cyst accidents”. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 23 (5): 711–24. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.02.001. PMID 19299205.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Bhavsar AK, Gelner EJ, Shorma T (2016). “Common Questions About the Evaluation of Acute Pelvic Pain”. Am Fam Physician. 93 (1): 41–8. PMID 26760839.
  15. {{Cite journal | author = W. E. Stamm | title = Etiology and management of the acute urethral syndrome | journal = Sexually transmitted diseases | volume = 8 | issue = 3 | pages = 235–238 | year = 1981 | month = July-September | pmid = 7292216
  16. {{Cite journal | author = W. E. Stamm, K. F. Wagner, R. Amsel, E. R. Alexander, M. Turck, G. W. Counts & K. K. Holmes | title = Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women | journal = The New England journal of medicine | volume = 303 | issue = 8 | pages = 409–415 | year = 1980 | month = August | doi = 10.1056/NEJM198008213030801 | pmid = 6993946
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Endometriosis affects approximately 11,000 per 100,000 females of reproductive age. Endometriosis affects approximately 1 in 10 individuals of reproductive age.[1] Endometriosis is more common in the Caucasian population than the African American population. Endometriosis accounts for the majority of patients with chronic pelvic pain and infertility.

More recent global estimates suggest that the prevalence of endometriosis among women aged 15–49 years is 7% (95% uncertainty interval, 6.0%–8.0%).[1]

Among individuals undergoing laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis is identified in approximately 33% to 50% of cases.[2][3]

Among individuals with infertility, endometriosis is identified in approximately 20% to 50% of cases.[4]

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • Epidemiological data for endometriosis is scarce due to the following reasons:[5]
    • Endometriosis includes a wide spectrum of symptoms and pathologic findings.
    • Endometriosis is asymptomatic in the early stages and a diagnosis is usually made for the first time as a part of infertility work up.
    • True prevalence may be underestimated due to prolonged diagnostic delay and reliance on surgical confirmation for definitive diagnosis.[6]

Prevalence

  • Worldwide, the prevalence of endometriosis is approximately 11,000 per 100,000 females in reproductive age group.[7]
  • Endometriosis accounts for 33,000 per 100,000 cases with chronic pelvic pain and 17,000 per 100,000 cases with infertility.[8]
  • In population-based analyses, the estimated prevalence among women aged 15–49 years is 7% (95% uncertainty interval, 6.0%–8.0%).[1]
  • Among individuals evaluated surgically for chronic pelvic pain, prevalence estimates range from 33% to 50%.[2][3]
  • Among individuals with infertility, endometriosis is present in approximately 20% to 50% of cases.[4]
  • Endometriosis is also a common finding among adolescents undergoing surgical evaluation for chronic pelvic pain[2][3]
  • Endometriosis may also be incidentally identified during surgical procedures performed for other indications.[2][3]

Diagnostic Delay

  • The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis is approximately 7 years.[6]
  • Diagnostic delay may result from normalization of menstrual pain, symptom overlap with other conditions, and limited access to specialized care.

Race

  • Endometriosis is more common in the Caucasian population than the African American population.[5]

Age

  • Endometriosis primarily affects women in the reproductive age group (usually between 15 and 45 years of age).  
  • The peak age of diagnosis is between 25 and 35 years.  
  • Although most commonly diagnosed in adults, endometriosis has been reported in adolescents and in individuals with obstructive Müllerian anomalies.[9]

Gender

Genetic Predisposition

  • Twin studies estimate the heritability of endometriosis to be approximately 50%.[10][11]
  • Among sisters of affected individuals, the relative risk of endometriosis is 5.2 (95% CI, 3.4–7.2).[12]
  • Although familial clustering is observed, no single gene accounts for the majority of cases.

Risk Factors

  • Early menarche (before age 12 years) is associated with increased risk of endometriosis.[13]
  • Short menstrual cycle length (<28 days) is associated with increased risk.[14]
  • Lower body mass index has been associated with increased risk.[15]
  • Nulliparity is associated with increased risk of endometriosis.[16]
  • Among individuals with obstructive Müllerian anomalies, the prevalence of endometriosis is 47% (95% CI, 36%–58%).[9]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Shim JY, Laufer MR, King CR, Lee TTM, Einarsson JI, Tyson N. Evaluation and management of endometriosis in the adolescent. Obstet Gynecol.2024;143(1):44-51.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Lin T, Allaire C, As-Sanie S, et al; WERF EPHect Physical ExaminationWorking Group.World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project, V: physical examination standards in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril. 2024;122(2):304-315. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.03.007
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Singh SS, Allaire C, Al-Nourhji O, et al. Guideline No. 449: diagnosis and impact of endometriosis—a canadian guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024;46(5):102450. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102450
  4. 4.0 4.1 Hamdan M, Omar SZ, Dunselman G, Cheong Y. Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):79-88. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000592
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cramer DW, Missmer SA (2002). “The epidemiology of endometriosis”. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 955: 11–22, discussion 34-6, 396–406. PMID 11949940.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Allaire C, BedaiwyMA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. CMAJ. 2023;195(10):E363-E371. doi:10.1503/cmaj.220637
  7. Buck Louis, Germaine M.; Hediger, Mary L.; Peterson, C. Matthew; Croughan, Mary; Sundaram, Rajeshwari; Stanford, Joseph; Chen, Zhen; Fujimoto, Victor Y.; Varner, Michael W.; Trumble, Ann; Giudice, Linda C. (2011). “Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study”. Fertility and Sterility. 96 (2): 360–365. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087. ISSN 0015-0282.
  8. McDonald JS (2001). “Diagnosis and treatment issues of chronic pelvic pain”. World J Urol. 19 (3): 200–7. PMID 11469608.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Vercellini P, Salmeri N, Somigliana E, et al. Müllerian anomalies and endometriosis as potential explanatory models for the retrograde menstruation/implantation and the embryonic remnants/celomic metaplasia pathogenic theories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod.2024;39(7):1460-1470. doi:10.1093/humrep/deae086
  10. Saha R, Pettersson HJ, Svedberg P, et al. Heritability of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):947-952. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.035
  11. Treloar SA, O’Connor DT, O’Connor VM, Martin NG. Genetic influences on endometriosis in an Australian twin sample. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(4):701- 710. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00540-8
  12. Stefansson H, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):555-559. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.3.555
  13. LuMY, Niu JL, Liu B. The risk of endometriosis by early menarche is recently increased: ameta-analysis of literature published from 2000 to 2020. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):59-69. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06541-0
  14. Wei M, Cheng Y, Bu H, Zhao Y, ZhaoW. Length of menstrual cycle and risk of endometriosis: ameta-analysis of 11 case-control studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(9):e2922. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002922
  15. Liu Y, ZhangW. Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: ameta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):46928-46936. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14916
  16. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, et al. Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104 (5 Pt 1):965-974. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000142714.54857.f8
Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Risk factors predisposing women to the development of endometriosis include early age at menarche, nulliparity, positive family history, and the presence of congenital cervical stenosis or obstructive lesions in the uterovaginal tract. Additional epidemiologic risk factors include short menstrual cycle length, lower body mass index, and obstructive Müllerian anomalies.[1][2]

Twin studies estimate the heritability of endometriosis to be approximately 50%.[3]

Risk Factors

The risk factors predisposing women to develop endometriosis include the following:[4][5]

  • Presence of cervical stenosis and other congenital outflow obstructions (leads to the retrograde efflux of the menstrual fluid into the fallopian tubes and peritoneal cavity); among individuals with obstructive Müllerian anomalies, the prevalence of endometriosis is 47% (95% CI, 36%–58%).[1]
  • Caffeine or alcohol use
  • First-degree family relative with endometriosis (relative risk among sisters 5.2; 95% CI, 3.4–7.2).[6][7]
  • Nulliparity (associated with increased risk; pregnancy may be protective due to prolonged anovulation).[8]
  • Menarche before 12 years of age (associated with increased risk).[2]
  • Short menstrual cycle length (<28 days), associated with increased risk.[9]
  • Lower body mass index (associated with increased risk).[10]
  • Tall stature
  • Genetic susceptibility with estimated heritability of approximately 50%.[11]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Vercellini P, Salmeri N, Somigliana E, et al. Müllerian anomalies and endometriosis as potential explanatory models for the retrograde menstruation/implantation and the embryonic remnants/celomic metaplasia pathogenic theories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2024;39(7):1460-1470. doi:10.1093/humrep/ deae086
  2. 2.0 2.1 LuMY, Niu JL, Liu B. The risk of endometriosis by early menarche is recently increased: ameta-analysis of literature published from 2000 to 2020. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):59-69. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06541-0
  3. Saha R, Pettersson HJ, Svedberg P, et al. Heritability of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):947-952. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.035
  4. Thomsen LH, Schnack TH, Buchardi K, Hummelshoj L, Missmer SA, Forman A; et al. (2017). “Risk factors of epithelial ovarian carcinomas among women with endometriosis: a systematic review”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 96 (6): 761–778. doi:10.1111/aogs.13010. PMID 27565819.
  5. Lassus H, Pasanen A, Bützow R (2015). “[Is endometriosis a premalignant condition to ovarian carcinoma?]”. Duodecim. 131 (19): 1777–84. PMID 26638662.
  6. Cramer DW, Missmer SA (2002). “The epidemiology of endometriosis”. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 955: 11–22, discussion 34-6, 396–406. PMID 11949940.
  7. Stefansson H, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):555-559. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.3.555
  8. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, et al. Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104 (5 Pt 1):965-974. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000142714.54857.f8
  9. Wei M, Cheng Y, Bu H, Zhao Y, ZhaoW. Length of menstrual cycle and risk of endometriosis: a meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies. Medicine(Baltimore). 2016;95(9):e2922. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002922
  10. Liu Y, ZhangW. Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: ameta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):46928-46936. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14916
  11. Treloar SA, O’Connor DT, O’Connor VM, Martin NG. Genetic influences on endometriosis in an Australian twin sample. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(4):701-710. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00540-8
Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

There are no screening recommendations for endometriosis.

Screening

There are currently no recommended population-based screening strategies for endometriosis. Diagnosis is symptom-driven and confirmed through clinical evaluation and, when necessary, surgical visualization.

References

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Endometriosis affects females in the reproductive age group. Endometriosis has a wide spectrum of presentations. It can be asymptomatic, present with premenstrual spotting and cyclical abdominal pain, present with infertility or chronic pelvic pain, or present as deep endometriosis with dyspareunia, dyschezia, and cyclical rectal bleeding. Complications of endometriosis include infertility, fibrosis, chocolate cyst, and rarely, other organs such as the lungs can be affected.

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease.[1]

The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis is approximately 7 years.[2]

Pain severity does not reliably correlate with lesion number, location, or subtype (except deep posterior cul-de-sac disease, which correlates with dyspareunia).[3][4]

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

Endometriosis is a condition affecting females in the reproductive age group. Endometriosis has a wide spectrum of presentations; it may be asymptomatic or present with premenstrual spotting and cyclical abdominal pain. Endometriosis may also present with infertility or chronic pelvic pain, or as deep endometriosis presenting with dyspareunia, dyschezia, and cyclical rectal bleeding. The progression of the disease, if left untreated, is variable. It can progress to a severe disease or regress or remain the same. Severe disease is called deep endometriosis. It presents with chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and other complications due to the extensive fibrosis of the pelvic structures.[5][6]

Lesion progression is associated with localized fibrosis, angiogenesis, and coordinated nerve and blood vessel ingrowth, which contribute to structural distortion and chronic pain.[7][8]

Endometriosis demonstrates a heterogeneous clinical course. Some individuals experience stable symptoms, while others develop progressive deep infiltrating disease involving the bowel, bladder, or ureter.[7]

In less than 1% of patients, deep endometriosis may result in bowel obstruction, hydroureter, hematochezia, or hematuria.[9][10]

Pain associated with endometriosis may involve nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic mechanisms.[11][12]

Central sensitization may develop, leading to amplification of pain signals, widespread body pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive symptoms.[11][12]

Pain may persist despite hormonal suppression or surgical excision of lesions.[11][12]

Complications

The major complication of endometriosis is infertility; Endometriosis is identified in approximately 20% to 50% of individuals with infertility.[13]

Infertility may result from impaired ovarian function, adhesions causing tubal obstruction, and dysfunction of the uterine endometrium.[8]

Common Complications

Common complications of endometriosis include:[14][15]

  • Internal abdominal organ scarring
  • Adhesions
  • Pelvic cysts
  • Chocolate cysts
  • Ruptured cyst
  • Endometriosis is also associated with chronic overlapping pain conditions, including irritable bowel syndrome, bladder pain syndrome, and pelvic floor myalgia.[11][12]

Less Common Complications

Less common complications of endometriosis include:

  • Bowel obstruction  
  • Ureteral obstruction or hydroureter  
  • Hematochezia  
  • Hematuria  
  • Thoracic endometriosis presenting with catamenial pneumothorax or hemoptysis[16]

Malignant Transformation

Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.[17][18][19]

Prognosis

Prognosis of endometriosis varies with medical therapy. The majority of patients improve with medical therapy, but symptoms may recur in 30-40% of patients after the completion of treatment.[20]

Pain improvement following surgical excision is variable, and symptom recurrence may occur even in the absence of visible recurrent lesions.[11][12]

Endometriosis is a chronic condition, and long-term management may be required.

References

  1. Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J, et al; InternationalWorking Group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES. An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(4):hoab029. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoab029
  2. Allaire C, BedaiwyMA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. CMAJ. 2023;195 (10):E363-E371. doi:10.1503/cmaj.220637
  3. Pashkunova D, Darici E, Senft B, et al. Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis: correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.2024;103(9):1764-1770. doi:10.1111/aogs.14921
  4. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):266-271. doi:10.1093/humrep/del339
  5. Wenger JM, Loubeyre P, Marci R, Dubuisson JB (2009). “[Endometriosis: review of the literature and clinical management]”. Rev Med Suisse. 5 (222): 2085–6, 2088–90. PMID 19947450.
  6. Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Vincent K (2014). “Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis”. Hum Reprod Update. 20 (5): 737–47. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu025. PMC 4501205. PMID 24920437.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. 2021;184(11):2807-2824. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.041
  8. 8.0 8.1 Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ.2022;379:e070750. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070750
  9. Mușat F, Păduraru DN, Bolocan A, Constantinescu A, Ion D, Andronic O. Endometriosis as an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction—a comprehensive literature review. J Clin Med.2023;12(19):6376. doi:10.3390/jcm12196376
  10. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P. Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation. EurUrol. 2017;71(5):790-807. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Coxon L, Demetriou L, Vincent K. Current developments in endometriosis-associated pain. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(10):101769. doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101769
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Kaplan CM, Kelleher E, Irani A, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ, Harte SE. Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(6):347-363. doi:10.1038/s41582-024-00966-8
  13. Hamdan M, Omar SZ, Dunselman G, Cheong Y. Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):79-88. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000592
  14. Donnez J, Donnez O, Orellana R, Binda MM, Dolmans MM (2016). “Endometriosis and infertility”. Panminerva Med. 58 (2): 143–50. PMID 26837776.
  15. Karaman Y, Uslu H (2015). “Complications and their management in endometriosis surgery”. Womens Health (Lond). 11 (5): 685–92. doi:10.2217/whe.15.55. PMID 26315050.
  16. AndresMP, Arcoverde FVL, Souza CCC, Fernandes LFC, Abrão MS, Kho RM. Extrapelvic endometriosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):373-389. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.004
  17. Gibbons T, Rahmioglu N, Zondervan KT, Becker CM. Crimson clues: advancing endometriosis detection and management with novel blood biomarkers. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(2):145-163. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.018
  18. Leyland N, Casper R, Laberge P, Singh SS; SOGC. Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(7)(suppl 2):S1-S32. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34589-3
  19. Brown J, Crawford TJ, Allen C, Hopewell S, Prentice A. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD004753. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004753.pub4
  20. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Mangili G, Bergamini A, Inversetti A, Giorgione V; et al. (2016). “A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes”. Hum Reprod Update. 22 (1): 70–103. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv045. PMID 26450609.
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH