Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Jesus Rosario Hernandez, M.D. [3] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [4]

Synonyms and keywords: Salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma; Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands; Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the salivary glands; Salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinomas; MEC

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]

Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (also known as “Salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma”) is a malignant salivary gland tumor that consists of epidermoid and mucin producing cells. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas arise from mucous cells, which is normally involved in the secretion of mucous and the protection of surrounding tissue.[1] Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor, and usually occurs in the parotid and submandibular salivary glands. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas may be classified according to location into 2 subtypes: salivary gland confined carcinomas and other organ mucoepidermoid tumors.[2] The majority of these tumors present as parotid gland mucoepidermoid carcincoma lesions (65%). Development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the result of an abnormal production of mucin by mucus-secreting cells.[3] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include MECT1 and MAML2 fusion genes.[1] Mucoepidermoid carcinomas are usually found in middle aged adults between the second and sixth decade of life. Males are slightly more affected with mucoepidermoid carcinoma than females. The incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is approximately 2.5 to 3.0 cases per 100,000 individuals a year.[4] If left untreated, progression occurs slow and is then followed by sentinel lymph node metastasis. The treatment choice for mucoepidermoid carcinoma is surgical removal.[1]

Historical Perspective

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was first described by Masson and Berger, two American pathologists, in 1924.[5]

Classification

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be classified according to location into 2 subtypes: salivary gland-confined carcinomas and other organ mucoepidermoid carcinomas.

Pathophysiology

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas arise from mucous cells, which are normally involved in the secretion of mucous and the protection of the surrounding tissue. The pathogenesis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma consists of abnormal production of mucin from mucous cells, associated with the aberrant overgrowth of squamous and epidermoid cells. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include the MECT1 and MAML2 fusion genes. On gross pathology, mucoepidermoid carcinomas have a cystic, solid or mixed appearance, are normally located on the parotid or submandibular gland, and range in size from 1 to 8 cm.[6] On microscopic histopathological analysis, mucoepidermoid carcinomas are characterized by mucous cells with abundant fluffy cytoplasm and large mucin vacuoles.[6]

Causes

There are no established direct causes for mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma has been associated with the result of multiple genetic mutations in the MECT1 and MAML2 fusion genes.

Differentiating Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma from other Diseases

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause painless swelling, facial deformity, and facial numbness, such as Warthin tumour, adenoid cystic carcinoma, benign mixed tumor, and metastasis.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor among general population. The incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is approximately 2.5 to 3.0 cases per 100,000 individuals a year.[2] The incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma increases with age. The median age at diagnosis is between 20 to 50 years.[7] Males are slightly more affected with mucoepidermoid carcinoma than females. There is no racial predilection for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[4]

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of salivary gland tumors include: ionizing radiation and occupations associated with an increased risk such as rubber products manufacturing, asbestos mining, plumbing, and some types of woodworking.[8]

Screening

According to the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[8]

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma may progress to develop sentinel metastasis to adjacent lymph nodes. Common complications of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include facial deformity, difficulty swallowing, and local lymph node metastasis. Prognosis will generally depend on the clinical stage, tumor size, and histological grade. The overall recurrence rate will depend on the stage.[9] Low grade tumors have a 90-98% survival rate and a low rate of local recurrence.[10]

Diagnosis

Staging

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, there are 6 stages of mucoepidermoid carcinoma based on the tumor size and node invasion. Each stage is assigned a letter and a number that designate the tumoral size and node invasion.[11]

History and Symptoms

The hallmark symptom of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is painless swelling. A positive history of cancer may be suggestive of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Symptoms related with mucoepidermoid carcinoma will vary depending on the size and location of the tumor. Common symptoms of mucoepidermoid carcinoma may include facial numbness, adjacent muscle soreness, mandible claudication, otorrhea, dysphagia, and trismus.[12]

Physical Examination

Physical examination findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma depend on the size and location of the tumor. Physical examination of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma is usually remarkable for tenderness and intraoral bluish-red mucosa.[7]

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

X Ray

On conventional radiography, there are no characteristic findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[2]

CT

On CT scan, characteristic findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include: well-circumscribed masses, usually with cystic components (low-grade tumors), enhancements of solid components, and calcification. High-grade tumors have poorly defined margins, infiltrate locally, and appear solid.[2]

MRI

On MRI, characteristic findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma will depend on the stage. Common findings include: low signal cystic spaces in T1 and high signal in cystic areas on T2.[2]

Ultrasound

On ultrasound, characteristic findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include: a well-circumscribed hypoechoic lesion with a partial or completely cystic appearance, in contrast to the relatively hyperechoeic normal parotid gland.[2]

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[2]

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies associated with mucoepidermoid carcinoma may include: fine needle aspiration biopsy and incisional biopsy.[2]

Treatment

Medical Therapy

There is no medical treatment for mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Radiotherapy can be neoadyuvant treatment in some lesions (dependent on the tumor stage and size).

Surgery

Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[11]

Primary Prevention

There is no primary prevention for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Secondary Prevention

There is no secondary prevention for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 ealey, W. V., Perzin, K. H. and Smith, L. (1970), Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Classification, clinical-pathologic correlation, and results of treatment. Cancer, 26: 368–388. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197008)26:2<368::AID-CNCR2820260219>3.0.CO;2-K
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Radiopedia. Dr Frank Gailliard. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mucoepidermoid-carcinoma-of-salivary-glands Accessed on February 17, 2016
  3. Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mucoepidermoid_carcinoma Accessed on February 17,2016
  4. 4.0 4.1 Evans HL (1984). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands: a study of 69 cases with special attention to histologic grading”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 81 (6): 696–701. PMID 6731349.
  5. Foote FWJ, Frazell EL. Tumors of the major salivary glands. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, first series, Fascicle 11. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1954
  6. 6.0 6.1 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Libre Pathology. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Mucoepidermoid carcinoma Accessed on February 17, 2015
  7. 7.0 7.1 Eneroth, C.-M. (1971), Salivary gland tumors in the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and the palate region. Cancer, 27: 1415–1418. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197106)27:6<1415::AID-CNCR2820270622>3.0.CO;2-X
  8. 8.0 8.1 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Salivary Gland Cancer Treatment–for health professionals (PDQ®).http://www.cancer.gov/types/head-and-neck/hp/salivary-gland-treatment-pdq#link/_403_toc Accessed on February 17, 2016
  9. Plambeck K, Friedrich RE, Schmelzle R (1996). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin: classification, clinical-pathological correlation, treatment results and long-term follow-up in 55 patients”. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 24 (3): 133–9. PMID 8842902.
  10. Armstrong JG, Harrison LB, Spiro RH, Fass DE, Strong EW, Fuks ZY (1990). “Malignant tumors of major salivary gland origin. A matched-pair analysis of the role of combined surgery and postoperative radiotherapy”. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116 (3): 290–3. PMID 2306346.
  11. 11.0 11.1 https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Radiation_Oncology/Head_%26_Neck/Salivary_gland Accessed on February 17, 2016
  12. Eversole LR (1970). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: review of 815 reported cases”. J Oral Surg. 28 (7): 490–4. PMID 5269211.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]

Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was first described by Masson and Berger, two American pathologists, in 1924.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1802, the first surgical excision of a parotid tumor was performed by Bertrandi.
  • in 1895, Volkmann described mucoepidermoid carcinoma as the most common malignant epithelial tumour of the salivary glands.[1]
  • In 1924, mucoepidermoid carcinoma was described by Mason and Berger.[2]
  • In 1945, Stewart and his associates, recognized mucoepidermoid of the salivary gland as a separate neoplasm and described its histopathology.[2]
  • In 1958, Beahrs and Adson first described the surgical technique for parotid surgery.

References

  1. Stewart FW, Foote FW, Becker WF (November 1945). “Muco-Epidermoid Tumors of Salivary Glands”. Ann. Surg. 122 (5): 820–44. PMC 1618293. PMID 17858687.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Woolner, Lewis B.; Pettet, John R.; Kirklin, John W. (1954). “Mucoepidermoid Tumors of Major Salivary Glands”. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 24 (12): 1350–1362. doi:10.1093/ajcp/24.12.1350. ISSN 0002-9173.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]


Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be classified according to location into 2 subtypes: salivary gland-confined carcinomas and other organ mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Based on histological features, it is divided into low, intermediate and high grade tumors.

Classification

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be classified according to location into 2 subtypes:[1]

Classification: Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas
Salivary gland-confined carcinomas
  • Major salivary glands (50%)
  • Parotid gland (40%)
  • Submandibular gland (7%)
  • Sublingual gland (3%)
  • Minor salivary glands (50%)
  • Palate (most common)
  • Retromolar area
  • Floor of the mouth
  • Buccal mucosa
  • Lip
  • Tongue
Other organ mucoepidermoid carcinomas
  • Thyroid
  • Lung

Grading based on Histopathology:

  • Mucoepidermoid carcinoma are graded into three sub types based on histopathological features:
    • Low
    • Intermediate
    • High grade
  • The three most popular grading systems are:
    • The AFIP grading system [2]
    • Modified Healey system[3]
    • The Brandwein system[4]
  • All categories are based on similar set of parameters which include both cytomorphologic and architectural, particularly perineural and angiolymphatic invasion.
Category Histopathologic findings
Low grade
  • Macrocysts, microcysts,
  • Transition with excretory ducts,
  • Differentiated mucin producing epidermoid cells, often in a 1:1 ratio, minimal to moderate intermediate cell population
  • Daughter cyst proliferation from large cysts    
  • Minimal to absent pleomorphism, rare mitoses    
  • Broad-front, often circumscribed invasion    
  • Pools of extravasated mucin with stromal reaction
Intermediated grade
High grade

References

  1. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Radiopedia. Dr Frank Gailliard. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mucoepidermoid-carcinoma-of-salivary-glands Accessed on February 17, 2016
  2. Goode RK, Auclair PL, Ellis GL (April 1998). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: clinical and histopathologic analysis of 234 cases with evaluation of grading criteria”. Cancer. 82 (7): 1217–24. PMID 9529011.
  3. Batsakis JG, Luna MA (October 1990). “Histopathologic grading of salivary gland neoplasms: I. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas”. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 99 (10 Pt 1): 835–8. doi:10.1177/000348949009901015. PMID 2221741.
  4. Brandwein MS, Ferlito A, Bradley PJ, Hille JJ, Rinaldo A (October 2002). “Diagnosis and classification of salivary neoplasms: pathologic challenges and relevance to clinical outcomes”. Acta Otolaryngol. 122 (7): 758–64. PMID 12484654.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas arise from mucous cells, which are normally involved in the secretion of mucous and the protection of the surrounding tissue. The pathogenesis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma consists of abnormal production of mucin from mucous cells, associated with the aberrant overgrowth of squamous and epidermoid cells. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include the MECT1 and MAML2 fusion genes. On gross pathology, mucoepidermoid carcinomas have a cystic, solid or mixed appearance, are normally located on the parotid or submandibular gland, and range in size from 1 to 8 cm.

Pathogenesis

Genetics

  • Development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be the result of multiple genetic mutations.
  • Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is specifically associated with t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation.[4][5]

Associated Conditions

Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection is commonly seen associated with development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

  • As HCMV is commonly resides in salivary gland ductal epithelium, It is hypothesized that HCMV could be integral part of pathogenesis of mucopidermoid carcinoma.
  • Following results were noted when they tested implication of HCMV in development

Gross Pathology

  • On gross pathology, mucoepidermoid carcinoma has a cystic, solid, or mixed appearance.
  • Mucoepidermoid carcinoma usually occurs in the parotid or submandibular gland.
  • Low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma are small and partially encapsulated.
  • It appears as fluctuant light blue or purplish submucosal lumps. [12]
  • Other findings on gross pathology include:
  • Tumor size ranging from 1 to 8 cm
  • Gray or white in color, with mucin filled cysts

Microscopic Pathology

The characteristic findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma on microscopic histopathological analysis are listed below.[13][9][14][1][15][16]

  • Mucus secreting cells
  • Composed of three cell types:
    • Epidermoid
    • Intermediate
    • Columnar
    • Clear cells
  • They all demonstrates prominent cystic growth. [9]
  • Mucin vacuoles may be rare; however they are integral part of histological features of mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
  • Hallmark of these tumors are:
    • Prominent cystic structures lined by mature mucous, intermediate, or epidermoid cells
    • Solid areas are not evident
    • Prominent fibrous stroma
    • It grows in a well-circumscribed manner
  • Mucoepidermoid tumors are graded histologically into:
    • Low grade
    • Intermediate grade
    • High grade.
  • Low grade is characterized by well-differentiated cells with little cellular atypia, high proportion of mucous cells, and prominent cyst formation.
  • Intermediate grade is characterized by intermediate features
  • High grade is characterized by poorly differentiated with cellular pleomorphism, high proportion of squamous cells, and solid with few if any cysts

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Devaraju R, Gantala R, Aitha H, Gotoor SG (August 2014). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma”. BMJ Case Rep. 2014: bcr–2013–202776. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-202776. PMC 4127757. PMID 25085946.
  2. Ali SA, Memon AS, Shaik NA, Soomro AG (2008). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of parotid presenting as unilocular cyst”. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 20 (2): 141–2. PMID 19385480.
  3. Pires FR, Chen SY, da Cruz Perez DE, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP (May 2004). “Cytokeratin expression in central mucoepidermoid carcinoma and glandular odontogenic cyst”. Oral Oncol. 40 (5): 545–51. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.11.007. PMID 15006629.
  4. Chen Z, Lin S, Li JL, Ni W, Guo R, Lu J, Kaye FJ, Wu L (April 2018). “CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-induced lncRNA LINC00473 expression maintains the growth and survival of human mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells”. Oncogene. 37 (14): 1885–1895. doi:10.1038/s41388-017-0104-0. PMC 5889358. PMID 29353885.
  5. Yan K, Yesensky J, Hasina R, Agrawal N (February 2018). “Genomics of mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic carcinomas”. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 3 (1): 56–61. doi:10.1002/lio2.139. PMC 5824110. PMID 29492469.
  6. Seethala RR, Dacic S, Cieply K, Kelly LM, Nikiforova MN (August 2010). “A reappraisal of the MECT1/MAML2 translocation in salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 34 (8): 1106–21. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181de3021. PMID 20588178.
  7. Okabe M, Miyabe S, Nagatsuka H, Terada A, Hanai N, Yokoi M, Shimozato K, Eimoto T, Nakamura S, Nagai N, Hasegawa Y, Inagaki H (July 2006). “MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript defines a favorable subset of mucoepidermoid carcinoma”. Clin. Cancer Res. 12 (13): 3902–7. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2376. PMID 16818685.
  8. Cheuk W, Chan JK (July 2007). “Advances in salivary gland pathology”. Histopathology. 51 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02719.x. PMID 17539914.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Luna MA (November 2006). “Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: revisited”. Adv Anat Pathol. 13 (6): 293–307. doi:10.1097/01.pap.0000213058.74509.d3. PMID 17075295.
  10. Alamri AM, Liu X, Blancato JK, Haddad BR, Wang W, Zhong X, Choudhary S, Krawczyk E, Kallakury BV, Davidson BJ, Furth PA (January 2018). “Expanding primary cells from mucoepidermoid and other salivary gland neoplasms for genetic and chemosensitivity testing”. Dis Model Mech. 11 (1). doi:10.1242/dmm.031716. PMC 5818080. PMID 29419396.
  11. Melnick, Michael; Sedghizadeh, Parish P.; Allen, Carl M.; Jaskoll, Tina (2012). “Human cytomegalovirus and mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands: Cell-specific localization of active viral and oncogenic signaling proteins is confirmatory of a causal relationship”. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 92 (1): 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.10.011. ISSN 0014-4800.
  12. Flaitz CM (2000). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the palate in a child”. Pediatr Dent. 22 (4): 292–3. PMID 10969433.
  13. Vulpe H, Giuliani M, Goldstein D, Perez-Ordonez B, Dawson LA, Hope A (October 2013). “Long term control of a maxillary sinus mucoepidermoid carcinoma with low dose radiation therapy: a case report”. Radiat Oncol. 8: 251. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-8-251. PMC 3829377. PMID 24165756.
  14. Maloth AK, Nandan SR, Kulkarni PG, Dorankula SP, Muddana K (December 2015). “Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Floor of the Mouth – A Rarity”. J Clin Diagn Res. 9 (12): ZD03–4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/15595.6912. PMID 26813873.
  15. Ritwik P, Cordell KG, Brannon RB (July 2012). “Minor salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma in children and adolescents: a case series and review of the literature”. J Med Case Rep. 6: 182. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-182. PMID 22759529.
  16. Joseph TP, Joseph CP, Jayalakshmy PS, Poothiode U (2015). “Diagnostic challenges in cytology of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Report of 6 cases with histopathological correlation”. J Cytol. 32 (1): 21–4. doi:10.4103/0970-9371.155226. PMC 4408672. PMID 25948939.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Mucoepidermoid carcincoma Libre Pathology. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Mucoepidermoid carcincoma Accessed on February 17, 2015


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

There are no established direct causes for mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma has been associated with the result of multiple genetic mutations.

Causes

  • There are no established direct causes for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
  • The development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be the result of multiple genetic mutations.[1]
  • Common genetic mutations for the development of mucoepidermoid carcinoma can be found here.

References

  1. Eneroth, C.-M. (1971), Salivary gland tumors in the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and the palate region. Cancer, 27: 1415–1418. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197106)27:6<1415::AID-CNCR2820270622>3.0.CO;2-X


Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause painless swelling, facial deformity, and facial numbness, such as Warthin’s tumor, adenoid cystic carcinoma, benign mixed tumor (salivary glands), and metastasis.

Differential Diagnosis

  • The table below summarizes the findings that differentiate mucoepidermoid carcinoma from other conditions that cause painless swelling, facial deformity, and facial numbness or weakness.[1][2]
Differential Diagnosis Similar Features Differentiating Features
Benign mixed tumor (salivary glands) Painless parotid swelling and facial deformity Histopathological findings
Warthin’s tumor Painless swelling and facial deformity Multicentric presentation (20%), usually small in size (1-4 cm), highly associated with smoking
Adenoid cystic carcinoma Local swelling Mainly occur in relation to the airways, tendency for perineural extension, distribution
Metastasis Painless swelling, facial deformity, and facial numbness. In metastasis, differentiating features include: primary tumor origin and histopathological findings.

References

  1. Eversole LR (1970). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: review of 815 reported cases”. J Oral Surg. 28 (7): 490–4. PMID 5269211.
  2. Mucoepidermoid carcincoma. Dr Ayush Noel. Radiopedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mucoepidermoid-carcinoma-of-salivary-glands Accessed on February 19, 2016

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor among general population. The incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is approximately 2.5 to 3.0 cases per 100,000 individuals a year. The incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma increases with age. The median age at diagnosis is between 20 to 50 years. Females are slightly more affected with mucoepidermoid carcinoma than males. There is no racial predilection for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The overall adjusted incidence rate of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is approximately 2.5 to 3.0 cases per 100,000 individuals a year.[1]

Prevalence

Age

  • The median age at diagnosis is between 20 to 60 years.[2][2]

Gender

  • Females are slightly more affected with mucoepidermoid carcinoma than males.[3]
  • The male to female ratio is approximately 3:2.[4]
  • In mucoepidermoid carcinoma, males are more commonly affected by the aggressive tumor form than females.

Race

  • There is no racial predilection for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.[2][5]

References

  1. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Radiopedia. Dr Frank Gailliard. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mucoepidermoid-carcinoma-of-salivary-glands Accessed on February 17, 2016
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Eneroth, C.-M. (1971), Salivary gland tumors in the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and the palate region. Cancer, 27: 1415–1418. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197106)27:6<1415::AID-CNCR2820270622>3.0.CO;2-X
  3. Devaraju R, Gantala R, Aitha H, Gotoor SG (August 2014). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma”. BMJ Case Rep. 2014: bcr–2013–202776. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-202776. PMC 4127757. PMID 25085946.
  4. Maloth AK, Nandan SR, Kulkarni PG, Dorankula SP, Muddana K (December 2015). “Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Floor of the Mouth – A Rarity”. J Clin Diagn Res. 9 (12): ZD03–4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/15595.6912. PMID 26813873.
  5. Evans HL (1984). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands: a study of 69 cases with special attention to histologic grading”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 81 (6): 696–701. PMID 6731349.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of salivary gland tumors include: ionizing radiation and occupations associated with an increased risk such as rubber products manufacturing, asbestos mining, plumbing, and some types of woodworking.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of salivary gland tumors, include:[1][1][2][3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Salivary Gland Cancer Treatment–for health professionals (PDQ®).http://www.cancer.gov/types/head-and-neck/hp/salivary-gland-treatment-pdq#link/_403_toc Accessed on February 17, 2016
  2. Zheng W, Shu XO, Ji BT, Gao YT (July 1996). “Diet and other risk factors for cancer of the salivary glands:a population-based case-control study”. Int. J. Cancer. 67 (2): 194–8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960717)67:2<194::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-O. PMID 8760587.
  3. Straif K, Weiland SK, Bungers M, Holthenrich D, Keil U (November 1999). “Exposure to nitrosamines and mortality from salivary gland cancer among rubber workers”. Epidemiology. 10 (6): 786–7. PMID 10535801.
  4. . doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19841101)54:9<1854:. Missing or empty |title= (help)

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: , Badria Munir M.B.B.S.[2] , Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [3]

Overview

If left untreated, patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma may progress to develop sentinel metastasis to adjacent lymph nodes. Common complications of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include facial deformity, dysphagia, and local lymph node metastasis. Prognosis will generally depend on the clinical stage, tumor size, and histological grade. The overall recurrence rate will depend on the stage. Low grade tumors have a 90-98% survival rate and a low rate of local recurrence.

Natural History

  • The majority of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma are initially asymptomatic.
  • Symptoms usually develop in the second or fifth decade of life, and initially patients complain of swallowing problems that are increased upon mastication.
  • If left untreated, patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma may progress to develop sentinel lymph node metastasis.
  • Mode of metastasis may be[1]

Complications

  • Common complications of mucoepidermoid carcinoma include:[2]

Prognosis

  • Prognosis will generally depend on the clinical stage, tumor size, and histological grade.[2]
  • The overall recurrence rate depends on the stage of the tumor.[2][3]
  • Low grade tumors have a 90-98% survival rate and a low rate of local recurrence.
  • High grade tumors have a 30-54% survival rate, and a high local recurrence rate.[3]
  • The 5-year survival rate of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma is:[4]
  • Stage I 75%
  • Stage II 59%
  • Stage III 57%
  • Stage IV 28%
  • Overall incidence of lymph node involvement ranges from 18–28%.
  • When distant metastases develop in patients with minor salivary gland tumours the average survival is 2.3 years
  • Tumours of the major salivary glands is 2.6 years.[5][6][7]

[8][9]

References

  1. Asuquo, ME; Nwagbara, VI; Umana, AN; Bassey, G; Ugbem, T (2013). “Giant Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland: A Case Report and Review of Literature”. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Oncology. 02 (01). doi:10.4172/2324-9110.1000103. ISSN 2324-9110.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Plambeck K, Friedrich RE, Schmelzle R (1996). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin: classification, clinical-pathological correlation, treatment results and long-term follow-up in 55 patients”. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 24 (3): 133–9. PMID 8842902.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Armstrong JG, Harrison LB, Spiro RH, Fass DE, Strong EW, Fuks ZY (1990). “Malignant tumors of major salivary gland origin. A matched-pair analysis of the role of combined surgery and postoperative radiotherapy”. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116 (3): 290–3. PMID 2306346.
  4. Wealey, W. V., Perzin, K. H. and Smith, L. (1970), Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Classification, clinical-pathologic correlation, and results of treatment. Cancer, 26: 368–388. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197008)26:2<368::AID-CNCR2820260219>3.0.CO;2-K
  5. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Berk R, Strong EW (October 1978). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin. A clinicopathologic study of 367 cases”. Am. J. Surg. 136 (4): 461–8. PMID 707726.
  6. Rapidis AD, Givalos N, Gakiopoulou H, Stavrianos SD, Faratzis G, Lagogiannis GA, Katsilieris I, Patsouris E (February 2007). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. Review of the literature and clinicopathological analysis of 18 patients”. Oral Oncol. 43 (2): 130–6. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.03.001. PMID 16857410.
  7. Clode, Ana Luisa; Fonseca, Isabel; Santos, J. Rosa; Soares, Jorge (1991). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands: A reappraisal of the influence of tumor differentiation on prognosis”. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 46 (2): 100–106. doi:10.1002/jso.2930460207. ISSN 0022-4790.
  8. Spitz, M. R.; Batsakis, J. G. (1984). “Major Salivary Gland Carcinoma: Descriptive Epidemiology and Survival of 498 Patients”. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery. 110 (1): 45–49. doi:10.1001/archotol.1984.00800270049013. ISSN 0886-4470.
  9. Rapidis, Alexander D.; Givalos, Nikolaos; Gakiopoulou, Hariklia; Stavrianos, Spyros D.; Faratzis, Gregory; Lagogiannis, George A.; Katsilieris, Ioannis; Patsouris, Efstratios (2007). “Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands”. Oral Oncology. 43 (2): 130–136. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.03.001. ISSN 1368-8375.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH