Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Polycystic kidney disease

For patient information page, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2] Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul Leena Josephin Jetty, M.B.B.S[3]

Synonyms and keywords: Polycystic kidney syndrome; polycystic kidney; PKD; autosomal dominant polycystic kisney disease; ADPKD; autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease; ARPKD

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), previously known as adult polycystic kidney disease, is a systemic disorder characterized primarily by multiple, bilateral renal cysts, cysts in other organs namely the liver and pancreas, and cardiovascular abnormalities including intracranial aneurysms and mitral valve prolapse. ADPKD is one of the most common inherited disorders worldwide almost 15 times more common than cystic fibrosis in the general population. It accounts for up to 3-5% of ESRD cases yearly. Classically, ADPKD presents with hypertension and varying degrees of renal insufficiency. Around half of the patients diagnosed with ADPKD will reach end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by the age of 60 years. Still, disease manifestation and severity is highly variable among patients even those within the same family.

Historical Perspective

King Stephen Bathory of Poland died from polycystic kidney disease in 1586. His death began the journey of the discovery of polycystic kidney disease as a disease process. In 1888, Fe´lix Lejars first used the term polycystic kidney. In the late 18th century, Dr. Matthew Baillie noted that these cysts were vesicular and not hydatid, and named them false hydatids of kidney. In 1994, PKD1 gene mutation on chromosome 16, was first implicated in the pathogenesis of ADPKD patients.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of polycystic kidney disease. There are 2 types of polycystic kidney disease, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). ADPKD has two major types ADPKD1 due to PDK1 mutation, and ADPKD2 due to PDK2 mutation. A third subtype can be considered in patients without any documented mutation. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) was previously known as infantile polycystic kidney disease and occurs mainly in children.

Pathophysiology

The pathogenesis of ADPKD is related to the protein products of the PKD1 and PKD2 genes known collectively as polycystins. These proteins are primarily involved in ciliary function in the renal tubular cells and defects in their function leads to intracellular cAMP accumulation and mTOR overactivity causing cell proliferation, fluid secretion, and abnormal extracellular matrix and intercellular interactions the main processes that lead to cyst formation.

Causes

Polycystic kidney disease is a genetic disorder. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is an autosomal dominant disorder due to the heterozygous inheritance of PKD1 (chromosome 16) or PKD2 (chromosome 4) gene mutations. Despite the disease being monogenic, phenotype is variable possibly due to a two-hit process, haploinsufficiency, or environmental factors. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is caused by a mutation in the PKHD1 gene.

Differentiating Polycystic Kidney Disease from Other Diseases

Autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause renal cysts, such as simple renal cysts, medullary sponge kidney, tuberous sclerosis complex, von hippel-lindau disease.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is approximately 100 – 250 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The prevalence of ADPKD varies in different countries. The prevalence of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is approximately 5 per 100,000 children in the United States. The incidence increases with age for ADPKD. ARPKD commonly affects infants and children. Males and females are equally affected by ADPKD.

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for polycystic kidney disease. Since both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms are genetic disorders, to review the genetic causes of polycystic kidney disease click here.

Screening

According to the Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis, screening for polycystic kidney disease by ultrasonography is recommended in at risk patients with family history of polycystic kidney disease. According to the kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO), screening for polycystic kidney disease in children less than 18 years of age is not recommended. Serum creatinine, urinalysis and regular blood pressure measurements can also be implemented to test in these patients.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

The earliest clinical signs of disease in patients with ADPKD include impaired renal concentrating capacity and hypertension. Other signs include flank pain, nephrolithiasis and urinary tract infections. In general half of the patients diagnosed with ADPKD will progress to ESRD by age 60. PDK1 mutants usually progress faster than PDK2 mutants. Factors associated with worse renal outcome include early age at diagnosis, male gender, uncontrolled hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cystic liver. Extra-renal manifestations in ADPKD include hepatic cysts usually more prevalent in women and with advancing age and declining renal function. Cysts can also be seen in the seminal vesicles, pancreas, and arachnoid membrane. Furthermore, the development of intracranial aneurysms can be a lethal complication in ADPKD patients whose risk is closely linked to the family history of aneurysms. Mitral valve prolapse is also a common cardiac manifestation seen in 25% of patients. Most cases of ARPKD present in the neonatal period with some disease findings detected on prenatal ultrasound. Most feared and common complication of ARPKD is pulmonary hypoplasia. Half of ARPKD patients usually progress to ESRD by age of 10. The prognosis of ARPKD improves in patients who survive the first few months of life. Survival at 15 years for patients of ARPKD ranges from 50% – 80%.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

The diagnostic study of choice for polycystic kidney disease is ultrasound. Findings on an ultrasound diagnostic of polycystic kidney disease include, atleast three unilateral or bilateral cysts in patients 15 – 39 years old, atleast two cysts in each kidney in patients 40 – 59 years old, atleast four cysts in each kidney in patients 60 years of age or older.

History and Symptoms

The hallmark of polycystic kidney disease is flank or back pain. A positive family history of renal failure, cystic diseases, intracranial aneurysms is suggestive of polycystic kidney disease. The most common symptoms of polycystic kidney disease include hematuria, polyuria, nocturia and hypertension.

Physical Examination

Patients with polycystic kidney disease usually are in discomfort. Physical examination of patients with polycystic kidney disease is usually remarkable for hypertension, jaundice, pallor, icteric sclera, palpable nodular hepatomegaly, palpable flank mass.

Laboratory Findings

Common laboratory findings in polycystic kidney disease are urinary abnormalities including reduction in concentration capacity, hypocitraturia, hematuria, and proteinuria. Hyperuricemia is also a common finding and is a risk factor for disease progression and ESRD.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with polycystic kidney disease.

X-ray

An x-ray KUB may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of polycystic kidney disease include, enlarged kidneys, multiple ring like calcifications arising from the renal cyst, elongated and splayed calyces due to the cyst.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on an ultrasound diagnostic of polycystic kidney disease include, atleast three unilateral or bilateral cysts in patients 15 – 39 years old, atleast two cysts in each kidney in patients 40 – 59 years old, atleast four cysts in each kidney in patients 60 years of age or older.

CT scan

Although ultrasonography is the modality of choice for diagnosing ADPKD mainly due to the low cost and lack of radiation exposure, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have higher resolutions and increased sensitivity for renal cysts less than 1 cm in diameter. Findings on CT scan include, numerous renal cysts of varying size and shape with little intervening parenchyma with water attenuation and very thin wall, reduction in sinus fat due to expansion of the cortex, occasional complex cysts with hyperdense appearance, with possible septations or calcifications, multiple homogeneous and hypoattenuating cystic lesions in the liver in patients with liver involvement.

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to identify cysts smaller than 1 cm and to differentiate complex from simple cysts without contrast or radiation exposure. Renal MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on MRI diagnostic of polycystic kidney disease include, T2 weighted images show enlarged kidneys with multiple cysts, normal parenchyma is absent, presence of fluid/fluid interface, wall thickening, hypointense signals in T2-weighted and DWI images, and hyperintense signals in T1-weighted images.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with polycystic kidney disease.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for polycystic kidney disease include, genetic testing, which demonstrates, frame insertions / deletions, non-canonical splice site alterations, combined missense changes.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Patients with polycystic kidney disease are treated with lisinopril or telmisartan for control of hypertension, tolvaptan for slowing disease progression, hydration, analgesia and bed rest. The treatment is targeted more towards managing symptoms and disease complications rather than slowing cyst formation.

Interventions

Dialysis is not the first-line treatment option for patients with polycystic kidney disease. Dialysis is usually reserved for patients with either end stage renal disease (ESRD) or renal failure.

Surgery

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with polycystic kidney disease. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either end stage renal disease (ESRD), recurrent UTI, chronic pain, renal cell carcinoma, chronic hematuria requiring transfusions. Surgical options are either nephrectomy or renal transplantation.

Primary Prevention

Since polycystic kidney disease is a genetic disorder. There are no established measures for the primary prevention of polycystic kidney disease.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of polycystic kidney disease.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2]

Overview

King Stephen Bathory of Poland died from polycystic kidney disease in 1586. His death began the journey of the discovery of polycystic kidney disease as a disease process. In 1888, Fe´lix Lejars first used the term polycystic kidney. In the late 18th century, Dr. Matthew Baillie noted that these cysts were vesicular and not hydatid, and named them false hydatids of kidney. In 1994, PKD1 gene mutation on chromosome 16, was first implicated in the pathogenesis of ADPKD patients.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

Famous Cases

The following are a few famous cases of Polycystic kidney disease:

  • King Stephen Bathory of Poland died from polycystic kidney disease in 1586[5]
  • His death began the journey of the discovery of polycystic kidney disease as a disease process.

References

  1. Balat A (February 2016). “Tear drops of kidney: a historical overview of Polycystic Kidney Disease”. G Ital Nefrol. 33 Suppl 66: 33.S66.21. PMID 26913889.
  2. BAILLIE, MATTHEW (2018). MORBID ANATOMY OF SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PARTS OF THE HUMAN BODY. BY MATTHEW BAILLIE, … THE… SECOND EDITION, CORRECTED AND CONSIDERABLY ENLARGE. S.l: GALE ECCO, PRINT EDITIONS. ISBN 1385243856.
  3. “Polycystic kidney disease: the complete structure of the PKD1 gene and its protein. The International Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium”. Cell. 81 (2): 289–98. April 1995. PMID 7736581.
  4. Onuchic LF, Furu L, Nagasawa Y, Hou X, Eggermann T, Ren Z, Bergmann C, Senderek J, Esquivel E, Zeltner R, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Mrug M, Sweeney W, Avner ED, Zerres K, Guay-Woodford LM, Somlo S, Germino GG (May 2002). “PKHD1, the polycystic kidney and hepatic disease 1 gene, encodes a novel large protein containing multiple immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domains and parallel beta-helix 1 repeats”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 (5): 1305–17. doi:10.1086/340448. PMC 447605. PMID 11898128.
  5. Torres VE, Watson ML (October 1998). “Polycystic kidney disease: antiquity to the 20th century”. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 13 (10): 2690–6. PMID 9794593.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

There is no established system for the classification of polycystic kidney disease. There are 2 types of polycystic kidney disease, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). ADPKD has 2 major types ADPKD1 due to PDK1 mutation, and ADPKD2 due to PDK2 mutation. A third subtype can be considered in patients without any documented mutation. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) was previously known as infantile polycystic kidney disease and occurs mainly in children.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of polycystic kidney disease. In general, 3 types of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) can be recognized based on the gene mutation identification:

  • ADPKD1 (Type 1) seen in almost 85% of patients refers to patients with PDK1 mutations
  • ADPKD2 (Type 1) seen in around 10-15% of cases denotes a mutation PDK2[1]
  • A third type that is still to be identified accounts for patients with clinical ADPKD without any documented mutation of either PKD1 or PKD2[2]
  • Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) was previously known as infantile polycystic kidney disease and occurs mainly in children[3]

References

  1. Torra R, Badenas C, Darnell A, Nicolau C, Volpini V, Revert L; et al. (1998). “[Clinical, genetic and molecular studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease]”. Med Clin (Barc). 110 (13): 481–7. PMID 9611728.
  2. Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Lancet. 369 (9569): 1287–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60601-1. PMID 17434405.
  3. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean L, Stephens K, Amemiya A, Sweeney WE, Avner ED. PMID 20301501. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

The pathogenesis of ADPKD is related to the protein products of the PKD1 and PKD2 genes known collectively as polycystins. These proteins are primarily involved in ciliary function in the renal tubular cells and defects in their function leads to intracellular cAMP accumulation and mTOR overactivity causing cell proliferation, fluid secretion, and abnormal extracellular matrix and intercellular interactions the main processes that lead to cyst formation.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Associated Conditions

Conditions associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD):

Conditions associated with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD):

Gross Pathology

Microscopic Pathology

  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, thickening and lamellation of tubular basement membranes, microcysts and negative immunofluorescence for complement and immunoglobulin are characteristic findings of ADPKD.[33][34][35][36]

References

  1. Hughes J, Ward CJ, Peral B, Aspinwall R, Clark K, San Millán JL; et al. (1995). “The polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1) gene encodes a novel protein with multiple cell recognition domains”. Nat Genet. 10 (2): 151–60. doi:10.1038/ng0695-151. PMID 7663510.
  2. Hayashi T, Mochizuki T, Reynolds DM, Wu G, Cai Y, Somlo S (1997). “Characterization of the exon structure of the polycystic kidney disease 2 gene (PKD2)”. Genomics. 44 (1): 131–6. doi:10.1006/geno.1997.4851. PMID 9286709.
  3. Qian F, Germino FJ, Cai Y, Zhang X, Somlo S, Germino GG (1997). “PKD1 interacts with PKD2 through a probable coiled-coil domain”. Nat Genet. 16 (2): 179–83. doi:10.1038/ng0697-179. PMID 9171830.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Chapman AB (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: time for a change?”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 18 (5): 1399–407. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007020155. PMID 17429048.
  5. Nauli SM, Alenghat FJ, Luo Y, Williams E, Vassilev P, Li X; et al. (2003). “Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells”. Nat Genet. 33 (2): 129–37. doi:10.1038/ng1076. PMID 12514735‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. Belibi FA, Reif G, Wallace DP, Yamaguchi T, Olsen L, Li H; et al. (2004). “Cyclic AMP promotes growth and secretion in human polycystic kidney epithelial cells”. Kidney Int. 66 (3): 964–73. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00843.x. PMID 15327388.
  7. Shillingford JM, Murcia NS, Larson CH, Low SH, Hedgepeth R, Brown N; et al. (2006). “The mTOR pathway is regulated by polycystin-1, and its inhibition reverses renal cystogenesis in polycystic kidney disease”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103 (14): 5466–71. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509694103. PMC 1459378. PMID 16567633‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Ward CJ, Hogan MC, Rossetti S, Walker D, Sneddon T, Wang X, Kubly V, Cunningham JM, Bacallao R, Ishibashi M, Milliner DS, Torres VE, Harris PC (March 2002). “The gene mutated in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease encodes a large, receptor-like protein”. Nat. Genet. 30 (3): 259–69. doi:10.1038/ng833. PMID 11919560.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Onuchic LF, Furu L, Nagasawa Y, Hou X, Eggermann T, Ren Z, Bergmann C, Senderek J, Esquivel E, Zeltner R, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Mrug M, Sweeney W, Avner ED, Zerres K, Guay-Woodford LM, Somlo S, Germino GG (May 2002). “PKHD1, the polycystic kidney and hepatic disease 1 gene, encodes a novel large protein containing multiple immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domains and parallel beta-helix 1 repeats”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 (5): 1305–17. doi:10.1086/340448. PMC 447605. PMID 11898128.
  10. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean L, Stephens K, Amemiya A, Sweeney WE, Avner ED. PMID 20301501. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  11. Sweeney WE, Avner ED (December 2006). “Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)”. Cell Tissue Res. 326 (3): 671–85. doi:10.1007/s00441-006-0226-0. PMID 16767405.
  12. “The polycystic kidney disease 1 gene encodes a 14 kb transcript and lies within a duplicated region on chromosome 16. The European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium”. Cell. 77 (6): 881–94. June 1994. PMID 8004675.
  13. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhuisen B, Saris JJ, Reynolds DM, Cai Y, Gabow PA, Pierides A, Kimberling WJ, Breuning MH, Deltas CC, Peters DJ, Somlo S (May 1996). “PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein”. Science. 272 (5266): 1339–42. PMID 8650545.
  14. “Polycystic kidney disease: the complete structure of the PKD1 gene and its protein. The International Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium”. Cell. 81 (2): 289–98. 1995. PMID 7736581.
  15. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhuisen B, Saris JJ; et al. (1996). “PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein”. Science. 272 (5266): 1339–42. PMID 8650545‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  16. Torra R, Badenas C, Darnell A, Nicolau C, Volpini V, Revert L; et al. (1998). “[Clinical, genetic and molecular studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease]”. Med Clin (Barc). 110 (13): 481–7. PMID 9611728.
  17. Paterson AD, Wang KR, Lupea D, St George-Hyslop P, Pei Y (2002). “Recurrent fetal loss associated with bilineal inheritance of type 1 autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Am J Kidney Dis. 40 (1): 16–20. doi:10.1053/ajkd.2002.33908. PMID 12087556.
  18. Hateboer N, v Dijk MA, Bogdanova N, Coto E, Saggar-Malik AK, San Millan JL; et al. (1999). “Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2. European PKD1-PKD2 Study Group”. Lancet. 353 (9147): 103–7. PMID 10023895.
  19. Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Lancet. 369 (9569): 1287–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60601-1. PMID 17434405.
  20. Belz MM, Hughes RL, Kaehny WD, Johnson AM, Fick-Brosnahan GM, Earnest MP, Gabow PA (October 2001). “Familial clustering of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 38 (4): 770–6. doi:10.1053/ajkd.2001.27694. PMID 11576880.
  21. Ring T, Spiegelhalter D (December 2007). “Risk of intracranial aneurysm bleeding in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Kidney Int. 72 (11): 1400–2. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5002488. PMID 17882153.
  22. Hossack KF, Leddy CL, Johnson AM, Schrier RW, Gabow PA (October 1988). “Echocardiographic findings in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 319 (14): 907–12. doi:10.1056/NEJM198810063191404. PMID 3419455.
  23. Ivy DD, Shaffer EM, Johnson AM, Kimberling WJ, Dobin A, Gabow PA (June 1995). “Cardiovascular abnormalities in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5 (12): 2032–6. PMID 7579051.
  24. Bae KT, Zhu F, Chapman AB, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, Guay-Woodford LM, Baumgarten DA, King BF, Wetzel LH, Kenney PJ, Brummer ME, Bennett WM, Klahr S, Meyers CM, Zhang X, Thompson PA, Miller JP (January 2006). “Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic cysts in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease cohort”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 1 (1): 64–9. doi:10.2215/CJN.00080605. PMID 17699192.
  25. Gabow PA, Johnson AM, Kaehny WD, Manco-Johnson ML, Duley IT, Everson GT (June 1990). “Risk factors for the development of hepatic cysts in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Hepatology. 11 (6): 1033–7. PMID 2365280.
  26. Telega G, Cronin D, Avner ED (June 2013). “New approaches to the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease patient with dual kidney-liver complications”. Pediatr Transplant. 17 (4): 328–35. doi:10.1111/petr.12076. PMC 3663883. PMID 23593929.
  27. Gunay-Aygun M, Font-Montgomery E, Lukose L, Tuchman Gerstein M, Piwnica-Worms K, Choyke P, Daryanani KT, Turkbey B, Fischer R, Bernardini I, Sincan M, Zhao X, Sandler NG, Roque A, Douek DC, Graf J, Huizing M, Bryant JC, Mohan P, Gahl WA, Heller T (January 2013). “Characteristics of congenital hepatic fibrosis in a large cohort of patients with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease”. Gastroenterology. 144 (1): 112–121.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.056. PMC 4162098. PMID 23041322.
  28. Roy S, Dillon MJ, Trompeter RS, Barratt TM (June 1997). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: long-term outcome of neonatal survivors”. Pediatr. Nephrol. 11 (3): 302–6. PMID 9203177.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Jahnukainen T, Kirjavainen T, Luoto T, Ylinen E, Linkosalo L, Arikoski P, Pakarinen M, Jalanko H (October 2015). “Long-term pulmonary function in children with recessive polycystic kidney disease”. Arch. Dis. Child. 100 (10): 944–7. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-308451. PMID 26163120.
  30. Sweeney WE, Avner ED (May 2011). “Diagnosis and management of childhood polycystic kidney disease”. Pediatr. Nephrol. 26 (5): 675–92. doi:10.1007/s00467-010-1656-1. PMID 21046169.
  31. Halvorson CR, Bremmer MS, Jacobs SC (2010). “Polycystic kidney disease: inheritance, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 3: 69–83. PMC 3108786. PMID 21694932.
  32. Igarashi P, Somlo S (September 2002). “Genetics and pathogenesis of polycystic kidney disease”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13 (9): 2384–98. PMID 12191984.
  33. Stavrou C, Koptides M, Tombazos C, Psara E, Patsias C, Zouvani I, Kyriacou K, Hildebrandt F, Christofides T, Pierides A, Deltas CC (October 2002). “Autosomal-dominant medullary cystic kidney disease type 1: clinical and molecular findings in six large Cypriot families”. Kidney Int. 62 (4): 1385–94. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid581.x. PMID 12234310.
  34. Bleyer AJ, Kmoch S, Antignac C, Robins V, Kidd K, Kelsoe JR, Hladik G, Klemmer P, Knohl SJ, Scheinman SJ, Vo N, Santi A, Harris A, Canaday O, Weller N, Hulick PJ, Vogel K, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Tuazon J, Deltas C, Somers D, Megarbane A, Kimmel PL, Sperati CJ, Orr-Urtreger A, Ben-Shachar S, Waugh DA, McGinn S, Bleyer AJ, Hodanová K, Vylet’al P, Živná M, Hart TC, Hart PS (March 2014). “Variable clinical presentation of an MUC1 mutation causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 9 (3): 527–35. doi:10.2215/CJN.06380613. PMC 3944763. PMID 24509297.
  35. Faguer S, Decramer S, Chassaing N, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Calvas P, Beaufils S, Bessenay L, Lengelé JP, Dahan K, Ronco P, Devuyst O, Chauveau D (October 2011). “Diagnosis, management, and prognosis of HNF1B nephropathy in adulthood”. Kidney Int. 80 (7): 768–76. doi:10.1038/ki.2011.225. PMID 21775974.
  36. Heidet L, Decramer S, Pawtowski A, Morinière V, Bandin F, Knebelmann B, Lebre AS, Faguer S, Guigonis V, Antignac C, Salomon R (June 2010). “Spectrum of HNF1B mutations in a large cohort of patients who harbor renal diseases”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 5 (6): 1079–90. doi:10.2215/CJN.06810909. PMC 2879303. PMID 20378641.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

Polycystic kidney disease is a genetic disorder. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is an autosomal dominant disorder due to the heterozygous inheritance of PKD1 (chromosome 16) or PKD2 (chromosome 4) gene mutations. Despite the disease being monogenic, phenotype is variable possibly due to a two-hit process, haploinsufficiency, or environmental factors. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is caused by a mutation in the PKHD1 gene.

Causes

Genetic Causes

References

  1. “Polycystic kidney disease: the complete structure of the PKD1 gene and its protein. The International Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium”. Cell. 81 (2): 289–98. 1995. PMID 7736581.
  2. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhuisen B, Saris JJ; et al. (1996). “PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein”. Science. 272 (5266): 1339–42. PMID 8650545‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. Torra R, Badenas C, Darnell A, Nicolau C, Volpini V, Revert L; et al. (1998). “[Clinical, genetic and molecular studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease]”. Med Clin (Barc). 110 (13): 481–7. PMID 9611728.
  4. Paterson AD, Wang KR, Lupea D, St George-Hyslop P, Pei Y (2002). “Recurrent fetal loss associated with bilineal inheritance of type 1 autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Am J Kidney Dis. 40 (1): 16–20. doi:10.1053/ajkd.2002.33908. PMID 12087556.
  5. Hateboer N, v Dijk MA, Bogdanova N, Coto E, Saggar-Malik AK, San Millan JL; et al. (1999). “Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2. European PKD1-PKD2 Study Group”. Lancet. 353 (9147): 103–7. PMID 10023895.
  6. Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Lancet. 369 (9569): 1287–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60601-1. PMID 17434405.
  7. Onuchic LF, Furu L, Nagasawa Y, Hou X, Eggermann T, Ren Z, Bergmann C, Senderek J, Esquivel E, Zeltner R, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Mrug M, Sweeney W, Avner ED, Zerres K, Guay-Woodford LM, Somlo S, Germino GG (May 2002). “PKHD1, the polycystic kidney and hepatic disease 1 gene, encodes a novel large protein containing multiple immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domains and parallel beta-helix 1 repeats”. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 (5): 1305–17. doi:10.1086/340448. PMC 447605. PMID 11898128.
  8. Ward CJ, Hogan MC, Rossetti S, Walker D, Sneddon T, Wang X, Kubly V, Cunningham JM, Bacallao R, Ishibashi M, Milliner DS, Torres VE, Harris PC (March 2002). “The gene mutated in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease encodes a large, receptor-like protein”. Nat. Genet. 30 (3): 259–69. doi:10.1038/ng833. PMID 11919560.

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

The prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is approximately 100 – 250 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. The prevalence of ADPKD varies in different countries. The prevalence of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is approximately 5 per 100,000 children in the United States. The incidence increases with age for ADPKD. ARPKD commonly affects infants and children. Males and females are equally affected by ADPKD.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • The prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is approximately 100 – 250 per 100,000 individuals in the United States.[1][2][3]
  • In 2013, the prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease was estimated to be 33 cases per 100,000 individuals in Germany.[4]
  • In 1998, the prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease was estimated to be 25 cases per 100,000 individuals in Japan.[5]
  • In 1996, the prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease was estimated to be 90 cases per 100,000 individuals in France.[6]
  • In 1991, the prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease was estimated to be 41 cases per 100,000 individuals in United Kingdom.[7]
  • In 1957, the prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease was estimated to be 100 cases per 100,000 individuals in Denmark.[8]
  • The prevalence of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is approximately 5 per 100,000 children in the United States.[9]

Age

  • The incidence of ADPKD increases with age; the average age at diagnosis is 30 – 50 years.[2]
  • ARPKD commonly affects infants and children.[9]

Race

  • There is no racial predilection to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Gender

  • Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease affects men and women equally.[10]

References

  1. Iglesias CG, Torres VE, Offord KP, Holley KE, Beard CM, Kurland LT (May 1983). “Epidemiology of adult polycystic kidney disease, Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1935-1980”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2 (6): 630–9. PMID 6846334.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Gabow PA (July 1993). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 329 (5): 332–42. doi:10.1056/NEJM199307293290508. PMID 8321262.
  3. Levy M, Feingold J (September 2000). “Estimating prevalence in single-gene kidney diseases progressing to renal failure”. Kidney Int. 58 (3): 925–43. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00250.x. PMID 10972657.
  4. Neumann HP, Jilg C, Bacher J, Nabulsi Z, Malinoc A, Hummel B; et al. (2013). “Epidemiology of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: an in-depth clinical study for south-western Germany”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 28 (6): 1472–87. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs551. PMID 23300259.
  5. Higashihara E, Nutahara K, Kojima M, Tamakoshi A, Yoshiyuki O, Sakai H; et al. (1998). “Prevalence and renal prognosis of diagnosed autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in Japan”. Nephron. 80 (4): 421–7. PMID 9832641.
  6. Simon P, Le Goff JY, Ang KS, Charasse C, Le Cacheux P, Cam G (1996). “[Epidemiologic data, clinical and prognostic features of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in a French region]”. Nephrologie. 17 (2): 123–30. PMID 8838759.
  7. Davies F, Coles GA, Harper PS, Williams AJ, Evans C, Cochlin D (1991). “Polycystic kidney disease re-evaluated: a population-based study”. Q J Med. 79 (290): 477–85. PMID 1946928.
  8. DALGAARD OZ (1957). “Bilateral polycystic disease of the kidneys; a follow-up of two hundred and eighty-four patients and their families”. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 328: 1–255. PMID 13469269‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. 9.0 9.1 Guay-Woodford LM, Desmond RA (May 2003). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: the clinical experience in North America”. Pediatrics. 111 (5 Pt 1): 1072–80. PMID 12728091.
  10. Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Lancet. 369 (9569): 1287–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60601-1. PMID 17434405.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Polycystic kidney disease from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2]

Overview

Autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause renal cysts, such as simple renal cysts, medullary sponge kidney, tuberous sclerosis complex, von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Differentiating Polycystic kidney disease from other Diseases

Autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease must be differentiated from other diseases that may cause renal cysts, such as simple renal cysts, medullary sponge kidney, tuberous sclerosis complex, von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Differentiating polycystic kidney disease from other diseases

Diseases Clinical manifestations Para–clinical findings Gold standard Additional findings
Symptoms Physical examination
Lab Findings Imaging Histopathology
Flank/abdominal pain Polyuria Hematuria Hepatomegaly Bilateral flank masses Hypertension Urinalysis Ultrasound CT scan
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)[1] + + + + + + Ultrasound Extrarenal manifestations:
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)[2] + + + + + + Ultrasound Extrarenal manifestations:
Simple renal cyst[3] +
  • Normal sized kidneys
  • Smooth contour
  • Negative family history of renal cystic disease
  • Age ≥ 30 yrs
Medullary sponge kidney[4][5] + +/– + +
Tuberous sclerosis complex[6][7] +/– +/– +/– +
  • CT kidneys will differentiate cystic and solid lesions, as well as renal angiomyolipomas
  • CT brain shows:
  • Cortical hamartomas
  • White matter lesions
Von Hippel-Lindau disease[8][9] + +/– + +
  • Differentiates simple from complex cysts
CT scan
Disease Symptoms Signs Diagnosis
Abdominal Pain Hematuria Headache Abdominal mass Abdominal tenderness Ultrasonography CT scan Histology
Polycystic kidney disease + + + (from hypertension) +

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on an ultrasound diagnostic of polycystic kidney disease include:[10][11]

  • At least three unilateral or bilateral cysts in patients 15 – 39 years old
  • Atleast two cysts in each kidney in patients 40 – 59 years old
  • Atleast four cysts in each kidney in patients 60 years of age or older

Renal CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease. Findings on CT scan diagnostic of ADPKD include:

  • Numerous renal cysts of varying size and shape with little intervening parenchyma with water attenuation and very thin wall.
  • Reduction in sinus fat due to expansion of the cortex
  • Occasional complex cysts with hyperdense appearance, with possible septations or calcifications
  • Multiple homogeneous and hypoattenuating cystic lesions in the liver in patients with liver involvement
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, thickening and lamellation of tubular basement membranes, microcysts and negative immunofluorescence for complement and immunoglobulin are characteristic findings of ADPKD.[12][13][14][15]
Wilms tumor + + + +
  • Wilms tumor has a triphasic appearance.
  • It is comprised of 3 types of cells:
  • All the 3 types are not required for the diagnosis of Wilms tumor.
  • Primitive tubules and glomeruli are often seen comprised of neoplastic cells.
  • Beckwith and Palmer reported in NWTS the different histopathologic types of Wilms tumor to categorize them based on prognosis.[19]
Renal cell carcinoma + + +/– +
  • Ultrasound (US) may be helpful when CT scan results are equivocal. It is noteworthy to mention that not all renal cell carcinomas are detectable on ultrasound.
Both CT and MRI may be used to detect neoplastic masses that may define renal cell carcinoma or metastasis of the primary cancer. CT scan and use of intravenous (IV) contrast is generally used for work–up and follow–up of patients with renal cell carcinoma. The histological pattern of renal cell carcinoma depends whether it is papillary, chromophobe or collecting duct renal cell carcinoma.
Rhabdoid kidney disease + + +
  • CT scan may be diagnostic of malignant rhabdoid tumor. Findings on CT scan suggestive of malignant rhabdoid tumor include a large, heterogenous, centrally located mass, which is lobulated with individual lobules separated by intervening areas of decreased attenuation, relating to either previous hemorrhage or necrosis. Enhancement is similarly heterogeneous. Calcification is relatively common, observed in 20–50% of cases and is typically linear and tends to outline tumor lobules.
  • Malignant rhabdoid tumor is characterized by the round blue tumor cells of high cellularity composed of atypical cells with eccentric nuclei, small nucleoli, and abundant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm with frequent mitotic figures.
Pheochromocytoma + (as a part of the hypertension paroxysm)
  • CT is the preferred imaging modality for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
The following findings may be observed on CT scan:[20]
  • On microscopic pathology, Pheochromocytoma typically demonstrates a nesting (Zellballen) pattern on microscopy. This pattern is composed of well–defined clusters of tumor cells containing eosinophilic cytoplasm separated by fibrovascular stroma.
Burkitt lymphoma +/– (in non–endemic or sporadic form of the disease)
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of Burkitt’s lymphoma include:[25]
  • Medium–sized (~1.5–2x the size of a RBC) with uniform size (“monotonous”) –– key feature (i.e. tumor nuclei size similar to that of histiocytes or endothelial cells)
  • Round nucleus
  • Small nucleoli
  • Relatively abundant cytoplasm (basophilic)
  • Brisk mitotic rate and apoptotic activity
  • Cellular outline usually appears squared off
  • “Starry–sky pattern”:
  • The stars in the pattern are tingible–body macrophages (macrophages containing apoptotic tumor cells.
  • The tumour cells are the sky
Intussusception + +/– +
  • Ultrasound is the gold standard imaging modality used to diagnose intussusception[26]
    • Target or doughnut sign[27]
      • Edematous intussuscipien forms an external ring around the centrally located intussusceptum
      • Target sign is usually seen in right lower quadrant
    • Layers of intussusception forms pseudo–kidney appearance on the transverse view
  • CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of intussusception. CT scan maybe used when other image modalities like x–ray and ultrasound have not given positive results but suspicion of intussusception is high.
  • Intussusception occurs if there is an imbalance between the longitudinal and radial smooth muscle forces of intestine that maintain its normal structure. This imbalance leads to a segment of intestine to invaginate into another segment and cause entero–enteral intussusception. Etiology of intussusception is either idiopathic or pathologic (lead point). 
Hydronephrosis + +/– + (CVA tenderness in case of pyelonephritis)
  • In the case of renal colic (one sided loin pain usually accompanied by a trace of blood in the urine) the initial investigation is usually an intravenous urogram. This has the advantage of showing whether there is any obstruction of flow of urine causing hydronephrosis as well as demonstrating the function of the other kidney. Many stones are not visible on plain x ray or IVU but 99% of stones are visible on CT and therefore CT is becoming a common choice of initial investigation.
  • The kidney undergoes extensive dilation with atrophy and thinning of the renal cortex.
Dysplastic kidney N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

MCDK is usually diagnosed by ultrasound examination before birth.

  • Mass of non–communicating cysts of variable size.
  • Unlike severe hydronephrosis, in which the largest cystic structure (the renal pelvis) lies in a central location and is surrounded by dilated calices, in multicystic dysplastic kidney the cyst distribution shows no recognizable pattern.
  • Dysplastic, echogenic parenchyma may be visible between the cysts, but no normal renal parenchyma is seen.
  • MCKD can be discovered accidentally on CT scan.
  • CT scan shows myltiple cysts with absence of renal parenchyma.
  • MCKD is the result of abnormal differentiation of the renal parenchyma.
Pediatric Neuroblastoma + +/– +/–
  • CT scan is the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma.[29]
  • On CT scan, neuroblastoma is characterized by:[30]
  • On microscopic histopathological analysis the presence of round blue cells separated by thin fibrous septa are characteristic findings of neuroblastoma.
  • Other findings of neuroblastoma on light microscopy may include:[31]
  • Homer–Wright rosettes (rosettes with a small meshwork of fibers at the center)
  • Neuropil–like stroma (paucicellular stroma with a cotton candy–like appearance)
Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma + +/– +/– +/– On CT scan, rhabdomyosarocma is characterized by:
  • Soft tissue density
  • Some enhancement with contrast
  • Adjacent bony destruction (over 20% of cases)
Mesoblastic nephroma + + +
  • Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • Mesoblastic nephroma may presents as a well–defined mass with low–level homogeneous echoes.[32]
  • The presence of concentric echogenic and hypoechoic rings can be a helpful diagnostic feature of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesoblastic nephroma.
  • Findings on CT scan suggestive of mesoblastic nephroma include:
  • Solid hypoattenuating renal lesion
  • Variable contrast enhancement
  • No calcification

Classic mesoblastic nephroma

Cellular mesoblastic nephroma

  • Plump cells with vesicular nuclei
  • Well–defined border
  • Mitotically active

Mixed mesoblastic nephroma

  • Both classic pattern and cellular pattern areas are present

References

  1. Gabow PA (July 1993). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 329 (5): 332–42. doi:10.1056/NEJM199307293290508. PMID 8321262.
  2. Adeva M, El-Youssef M, Rossetti S, Kamath PS, Kubly V, Consugar MB, Milliner DM, King BF, Torres VE, Harris PC (January 2006). “Clinical and molecular characterization defines a broadened spectrum of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)”. Medicine (Baltimore). 85 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000200165.90373.9a. PMID 16523049.
  3. Ravine D, Gibson RN, Donlan J, Sheffield LJ (December 1993). “An ultrasound renal cyst prevalence survey: specificity data for inherited renal cystic diseases”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 22 (6): 803–7. PMID 8250026.
  4. Gambaro G, Feltrin GP, Lupo A, Bonfante L, D’Angelo A, Antonello A (February 2006). “Medullary sponge kidney (Lenarduzzi-Cacchi-Ricci disease): a Padua Medical School discovery in the 1930s”. Kidney Int. 69 (4): 663–70. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000035. PMID 16395272.
  5. Levine E, Hartman DS, Meilstrup JW, Van Slyke MA, Edgar KA, Barth JC (August 1997). “Current concepts and controversies in imaging of renal cystic diseases”. Urol. Clin. North Am. 24 (3): 523–43. PMID 9275977.
  6. Umeoka S, Koyama T, Miki Y, Akai M, Tsutsui K, Togashi K (2008). “Pictorial review of tuberous sclerosis in various organs”. Radiographics. 28 (7): e32. doi:10.1148/rg.e32. PMID 18772274.
  7. Manoukian SB, Kowal DJ (May 2015). “Comprehensive imaging manifestations of tuberous sclerosis”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204 (5): 933–43. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.12235. PMID 25905927.
  8. Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R, Benjamin C, Harris R, Moore AT, Ferguson-Smith MA (November 1990). “Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease”. Q. J. Med. 77 (283): 1151–63. PMID 2274658.
  9. Lonser RR, Glenn GM, Walther M, Chew EY, Libutti SK, Linehan WM, Oldfield EH (June 2003). “von Hippel-Lindau disease”. Lancet. 361 (9374): 2059–67. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13643-4. PMID 12814730.
  10. Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Eckardt KU, Gansevoort RT, Harris T, Horie S, Kasiske BL, Odland D, Pei Y, Perrone RD, Pirson Y, Schrier RW, Torra R, Torres VE, Watnick T, Wheeler DC (July 2015). “Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): executive summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference”. Kidney Int. 88 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1038/ki.2015.59. PMC 4913350. PMID 25786098.
  11. Pei Y, Obaji J, Dupuis A, Paterson AD, Magistroni R, Dicks E, Parfrey P, Cramer B, Coto E, Torra R, San Millan JL, Gibson R, Breuning M, Peters D, Ravine D (January 2009). “Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis of ADPKD”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20 (1): 205–12. doi:10.1681/ASN.2008050507. PMC 2615723. PMID 18945943.
  12. Stavrou C, Koptides M, Tombazos C, Psara E, Patsias C, Zouvani I, Kyriacou K, Hildebrandt F, Christofides T, Pierides A, Deltas CC (October 2002). “Autosomal-dominant medullary cystic kidney disease type 1: clinical and molecular findings in six large Cypriot families”. Kidney Int. 62 (4): 1385–94. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid581.x. PMID 12234310.
  13. Bleyer AJ, Kmoch S, Antignac C, Robins V, Kidd K, Kelsoe JR, Hladik G, Klemmer P, Knohl SJ, Scheinman SJ, Vo N, Santi A, Harris A, Canaday O, Weller N, Hulick PJ, Vogel K, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Tuazon J, Deltas C, Somers D, Megarbane A, Kimmel PL, Sperati CJ, Orr-Urtreger A, Ben-Shachar S, Waugh DA, McGinn S, Bleyer AJ, Hodanová K, Vylet’al P, Živná M, Hart TC, Hart PS (March 2014). “Variable clinical presentation of an MUC1 mutation causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 9 (3): 527–35. doi:10.2215/CJN.06380613. PMC 3944763. PMID 24509297.
  14. Faguer S, Decramer S, Chassaing N, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Calvas P, Beaufils S, Bessenay L, Lengelé JP, Dahan K, Ronco P, Devuyst O, Chauveau D (October 2011). “Diagnosis, management, and prognosis of HNF1B nephropathy in adulthood”. Kidney Int. 80 (7): 768–76. doi:10.1038/ki.2011.225. PMID 21775974.
  15. Heidet L, Decramer S, Pawtowski A, Morinière V, Bandin F, Knebelmann B, Lebre AS, Faguer S, Guigonis V, Antignac C, Salomon R (June 2010). “Spectrum of HNF1B mutations in a large cohort of patients who harbor renal diseases”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 5 (6): 1079–90. doi:10.2215/CJN.06810909. PMC 2879303. PMID 20378641.
  16. Hartman DS, Sanders RC (April 1982). “Wilms’ tumor versus neuroblastoma: usefulness of ultrasound in differentiation”. J Ultrasound Med. 1 (3): 117–22. PMID 6152936.
  17. De Campo JF (1986). “Ultrasound of Wilms’ tumor”. Pediatr Radiol. 16 (1): 21–4. PMID 3003660.
  18. Cahan LD (1985). “Failure of encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis procedure in moyamoya disease”. Pediatr Neurosci. 12 (1): 58–62. PMID 4080660.
  19. Jolly RD, Stellwagen E, Babul J, Vodkaĭlo LV, Titov VL, Moldomusaev DM, Maianskiĭ AN (November 1975). “Mannosidosis of Angus Cattle: a prototype control program for some genetic diseases”. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 19 (23): 1–21. PMID 1978.
  20. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  21. Whalen RK, Althausen AF, Daniels GH (1992). “Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma”. J Urol. 147 (1): 1–10. PMID 1729490.
  22. Baid SK, Lai EW, Wesley RA, Ling A, Timmers HJ, Adams KT; et al. (2009). “Brief communication: radiographic contrast infusion and catecholamine release in patients with pheochromocytoma”. Ann Intern Med. 150 (1): 27–32. PMC 3490128. PMID 19124817.
  23. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  24. Burkitt lymphoma. MedlinePlus. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001308.htm Accessed on September 30, 2015
  25. Bellan C, Lazzi S, De Falco G, Nyongo A, Giordano A, Leoncini L (2003). “Burkitt’s lymphoma: new insights into molecular pathogenesis”. J. Clin. Pathol. 56 (3): 188–92. PMC 1769902. PMID 12610094. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  26. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J, Rohrschneider WK (2007). “Current radiological management of intussusception in children”. Eur Radiol. 17 (9): 2411–21. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0589-y. PMID 17308922.
  27. Boyle MJ, Arkell LJ, Williams JT (1993). “Ultrasonic diagnosis of adult intussusception”. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 88 (4): 617–8. PMID 8470658.
  28. Neuroblastoma. Radiopaedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 8 2015
  29. Colon NC, Chung DH (2011). “Neuroblastoma”. Adv Pediatr. 58 (1): 297–311. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2011.03.011. PMC 3668791. PMID 21736987.
  30. Neuroblastoma. Radiopaedia (2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 8 2015
  31. Neuroblastoma. Libre Pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Adrenal_gland#Neuroblastoma Accessed on October, 5 2015
  32. Mesoblastic nephroma.Dr Ayush Goel and Dr Yuranga Weerakkody et al. Radiopaedia.org 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mesoblastic-nephroma

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2]

Overview

There are no established risk factors for polycystic kidney disease. Since both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms are genetic disorders, to review the genetic causes of polycystic kidney disease click here.

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for polycystic kidney disease. Since both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms are genetic disorders, to review the genetic causes of polycystic kidney disease click here.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

According to the Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis, screening for polycystic kidney disease by ultrasonography is recommended in at risk patients with family history of polycystic kidney disease. According to the kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO), screening for polycystic kidney disease in children less than 18 years of age is not recommended. Serum creatinine, urinalysis and regular blood pressure measurements can also be implemented to test in these patients.

Screening

References

  1. Pei Y, Obaji J, Dupuis A, Paterson AD, Magistroni R, Dicks E, Parfrey P, Cramer B, Coto E, Torra R, San Millan JL, Gibson R, Breuning M, Peters D, Ravine D (January 2009). “Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis of ADPKD”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20 (1): 205–12. doi:10.1681/ASN.2008050507. PMC 2615723. PMID 18945943.
  2. Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Eckardt KU, Gansevoort RT, Harris T, Horie S, Kasiske BL, Odland D, Pei Y, Perrone RD, Pirson Y, Schrier RW, Torra R, Torres VE, Watnick T, Wheeler DC (July 2015). “Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): executive summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference”. Kidney Int. 88 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1038/ki.2015.59. PMC 4913350. PMID 25786098.
  3. Pei Y, Watnick T (2010). “Diagnosis and screening of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 17 (2): 140–52. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2009.12.001. PMC 2841025. PMID 20219617. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Taitz LS, Brown CB, Blank CE, Steiner GM (1987). “Screening for polycystic kidney disease: importance of clinical presentation in the newborn”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 62 (1): 45–9. PMC 1778152. PMID 3545099. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: M. Khurram Afzal, MD [2], Serge Korjian, Yazan Daaboul

Overview

The earliest clinical signs of disease in patients with ADPKD include impaired renal concentrating capacity and hypertension. Other signs include flank pain, nephrolithiasis and urinary tract infections. In general half of the patients diagnosed with ADPKD will progress to ESRD by age 60. PDK1 mutants usually progress faster than PDK2 mutants. Factors associated with worse renal outcome include early age at diagnosis, male gender, uncontrolled hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cystic liver. Extra-renal manifestations in ADPKD include hepatic cysts usually more prevalent in women and with advancing age and declining renal function. Cysts can also be seen in the seminal vesicles, pancreas, and arachnoid membrane. Furthermore, the development of intracranial aneurysms can be a lethal complication in ADPKD patients whose risk is closely linked to the family history of aneurysms. Mitral valve prolapse is also a common cardiac manifestation seen in 25% of patients. Most cases of ARPKD present in the neonatal period with some disease findings detected on prenatal ultrasound. Most feared and common complication of ARPKD is pulmonary hypoplasia. Half of ARPKD patients usually progress to ESRD by age of 10. The prognosis of ARPKD improves in patients who survive the first few months of life. Survival at 15 years for patients of ARPKD ranges from 50% – 80%.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD):

  • The earliest detectable functional aberration seen in patients with ADPKD is impaired concentrating capacity with a suboptimal increase in urinary osmolality following water deprivation.[1]
  • The second early manifestation of disease is hypertension. Up to 75% of patients with ADPKD on imaging without any renal insufficiency are hypertensive.[2]
  • Even in young patients, 50% of those aged 20-34 years are hypertensive despite normal renal function.[3]
  • Overt clinical signs and symptoms of renal disease usually appear during the fourth or fifth decade.[4]

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD):

  • Most affected individuals present in the neonatal period with some disease findings detected in prenatal obstetric ultrasounds.[5]
  • The most common initial findings in ARPKD patients involve abnormal renal structure and function.[6]
  • Approximately 30% of patients have no lab abnormalities at presentation.

Complications

Prognosis

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD):

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD):

References

  1. Gabow PA, Kaehny WD, Johnson AM, Duley IT, Manco-Johnson M, Lezotte DC; et al. (1989). “The clinical utility of renal concentrating capacity in polycystic kidney disease”. Kidney Int. 35 (2): 675–80. PMID 2709672.
  2. Gabow PA (1990). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease–more than a renal disease”. Am J Kidney Dis. 16 (5): 403–13. PMID 2239929.
  3. Kelleher CL, McFann KK, Johnson AM, Schrier RW (2004). “Characteristics of hypertension in young adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease compared with the general U.S. population”. Am J Hypertens. 17 (11 Pt 1): 1029–34. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.020. PMID 15533729.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Fick GM, Gabow PA (1994). “Natural history of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Annu Rev Med. 45: 23–9. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.45.1.23. PMID 8198379.
  5. Sweeney WE, Avner ED (2006). “Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)”. Cell Tissue Res. 326 (3): 671–85. doi:10.1007/s00441-006-0226-0. PMID 16767405.
  6. Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Steinkamm C, Becker J, Mücher G (1998). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease”. J Mol Med (Berl). 76 (5): 303–9. PMID 9587064.
  7. Schwab SJ, Bander SJ, Klahr S (1987). “Renal infection in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Am J Med. 82 (4): 714–8. PMID 3565428.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Gabow PA, Johnson AM, Kaehny WD, Manco-Johnson ML, Duley IT, Everson GT (1990). “Risk factors for the development of hepatic cysts in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Hepatology. 11 (6): 1033–7. PMID 2365280‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Bae KT, Zhu F, Chapman AB, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, Guay-Woodford LM; et al. (2006). “Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic cysts in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease cohort”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 1 (1): 64–9. doi:10.2215/CJN.00080605. PMID 17699192‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. 10.0 10.1 Torres VE, Harris PC, Pirson Y (2007). “Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Lancet. 369 (9569): 1287–301. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60601-1. PMID 17434405.
  11. Torres VE, Cai Y, Chen X, Wu GQ, Geng L, Cleghorn KA; et al. (2001). “Vascular expression of polycystin-2”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 12 (1): 1–9. PMID 11134244‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. Pirson Y, Chauveau D, Torres V (2002). “Management of cerebral aneurysms in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 13 (1): 269–76. PMID 11752048.
  13. Hossack KF, Leddy CL, Johnson AM, Schrier RW, Gabow PA (1988). “Echocardiographic findings in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. N Engl J Med. 319 (14): 907–12. doi:10.1056/NEJM198810063191404. PMID 3419455.
  14. Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Steinkamm C, Becker J, Mücher G (1998). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease”. J Mol Med (Berl). 76 (5): 303–9. PMID 9587064.
  15. Sweeney WE, Avner ED (2006). “Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)”. Cell Tissue Res. 326 (3): 671–85. doi:10.1007/s00441-006-0226-0. PMID 16767405.
  16. Guay-Woodford LM, Desmond RA (2003). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: the clinical experience in North America”. Pediatrics. 111 (5 Pt 1): 1072–80. PMID 12728091.
  17. Hateboer N, v Dijk MA, Bogdanova N, Coto E, Saggar-Malik AK, San Millan JL; et al. (1999). “Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2. European PKD1-PKD2 Study Group”. Lancet. 353 (9147): 103–7. PMID 10023895.
  18. Gabow PA, Duley I, Johnson AM (1992). “Clinical profiles of gross hematuria in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Am J Kidney Dis. 20 (2): 140–3. PMID 1496966.
  19. Gabow PA, Johnson AM, Kaehny WD, Kimberling WJ, Lezotte DC, Duley IT; et al. (1992). “Factors affecting the progression of renal disease in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease”. Kidney Int. 41 (5): 1311–9. PMID 1614046.
  20. Lederman ED, McCoy G, Conti DJ, Lee EC (2000). “Diverticulitis and polycystic kidney disease”. Am Surg. 66 (2): 200–3. PMID 10695753‎ Check |pmid= value (help).
  21. Guay-Woodford LM, Desmond RA (2003). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: the clinical experience in North America”. Pediatrics. 111 (5 Pt 1): 1072–80. PMID 12728091.
  22. Guay-Woodford LM, Desmond RA (2003). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: the clinical experience in North America”. Pediatrics. 111 (5 Pt 1): 1072–80. PMID 12728091.
  23. Sweeney WE, Avner ED (2006). “Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD)”. Cell Tissue Res. 326 (3): 671–85. doi:10.1007/s00441-006-0226-0. PMID 16767405.
  24. Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Steinkamm C, Becker J, Mücher G (1998). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease”. J Mol Med (Berl). 76 (5): 303–9. PMID 9587064.
  25. Fonck C, Chauveau D, Gagnadoux MF, Pirson Y, Grünfeld JP (2001). “Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease in adulthood”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 16 (8): 1648–52. PMID 11477168.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

External links

Template:Cystic diseases

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH