Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Congenital syphilis

For patient information, click here
To view the congenital infections main page Click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2]; Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [3] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[4]

Synonyms and keywords: Congenital lues; fetal syphilis

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[3]

Overview

Congenital Syphilis is caused by Treponema pallidum, its transmitted to the fetus in utero from an infected mother via the placenta. The severity of the disease is dependent on the stage of maternal infection and the duration of exposure to the fetus. Transmission is typically in the second trimester and the highest rates of transmission are seen in women with primary syphilis. The rates of transmission decrease with the increasing duration of the maternal infection, as the concentration of spirochetes in the blood stream decreases. Syphilis infection to the fetus in utero can result in stillborn, miscarriage and a live birth with severe manifestations of hydrops. Prenatal screening for syphilis during the first trimester is recommended to all pregnant women and adequate treatment with penicillin prevents the transmission to the fetus.

Historical Perspective

Congenital syphilis was first described in an English 17th century in a pediatric textbook. Transplacental transmission from an asymptomatic infected mother was first described in 1906. Sir Jonathan Hutchinson described the triad of notched incisors, interstitial keratitis, and eighth cranial nerve deafness as a criterion for diagnosis of congenital syphilis.

Classification

Congenital syphilis can be classified into early (presenting 0-2 years) and late (greater 2 years) based upon on time of presentation. There is also a diagnostic classification of syphilis used for surveillance purpose.

Pathophysiology

Pathophysiology of congenital syphilis is still unclear.The risk of transmission to the fetus is dependent on the stage of the maternal disease (dependent on the spirochete concentration in the blood stream) and the duration of exposure to the fetus in utero. The risk of vertical transmission of syphilis from an infected untreated mother decreases as maternal disease duration progresses: transmission risk of 70–100% for primary syphilis and 40% for early latent syphilis to 10% for late latent disease. The variation in the percentages with the duration of infection is due to the concentration of spirochetes in the blood stream, which decrease with the duration of maternal syphilis infection.

Causes

Congenital syphilis is caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum, which is passed from mother to child during fetal development or at birth.

Screening

Routine screening for syphilis during the antenatal period is recommended.

Diagnosis

History symptoms

Infants present with symptoms such as failure to gain weight or failure to thrive, fever, irritability, small blisters on the palms and soles, and with watery discharge from the nose.

Physical Examination

Physical examination findings suggestive of congenital syphilis include low birth weight, signs of prematurity, skin edema, pleural effusion, vesicular skin rash, corneal clouding, jaundice and deafness.

Laboratory Findings

Prental diagnosis is by detection of IgM antibodies aganist T.pallidum in the blood collected by chordocentesis, antenatal ultrasound is commonly done and the findings suggestive of congenital syphilis include: hydrops fetalis characterised by scalp oedema, placental thickening, serous cavity effusion, and polyhydramnios. Other additional findings inlcude hepatosplenomegaly, placentomegaly, non-continuous gastrointestinal obstruction and dilatation of the small bowel. Postnatal diagnosis is by examination of the placenta or umbilical cord using a silver stain demonstrates spirochetes or a T. pallidum PCR test can be done.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy for neonate presenting with symptoms of congenital syphilis is aqueous penicillin G. However evaluation and management is dependent on the clinical senario of presentation.

Prevention

Primary Prevention

Primary preventive measures include routine screening in pregnant females, individuals with high risk behaviours, and those residing in highly prevalent areas, abstinence from intimate physical contact with an infected person, consistent use of latex condoms, limiting no of sexual partners, avoid sharing sex toys and practice of safe sex.

Secondary Prevention

Regular follow up of infants with congenital syphilis to examine for the re-appearance of signs and symptoms of syphilis after recommended treatment has shown to improve outcomes.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Congenital syphilis was first described in an English 17th century in a pediatric textbook. Transplacental transmission from an asymptomatic infected mother was first described in 1906. Sir Jonathan Hutchinson described the triad of notched incisors, interstitial keratitis, and eighth cranial nerve deafness as a criterion for diagnosis of congenital syphilis.

Historical Perspective

  • Sir Jonathan Hutchinson described the triad of notched incisors, interstitial keratitis, and eighth cranial nerve deafness as a criterion for diagnosis of congenital syphilis. The condition was well described in the 15th century and has long been recognized as a syndrome transmitted from an infected adult.
  • In the 19th century congenital syphilis was believed to be transmitted during conception by the father’s sperm or during delivery in the birth canal, or from infected milk or breasts.[1]
  • In 1905, Schaudinn and Hoffmann identified Spirochaeta pallida.
  • Transplacental transmission from an asymptomatic infected mother was first described in 1906.[2]
  • In 1943, Lentz and Ingraham reported penicillin as treatment for congenital syphilis.
  • In 2006, the WHO launched a global effort to eliminate congenital syphilis.

References

  1. Obladen, Michael (2013). “Curse on Two Generations: A History of Congenital Syphilis”. Neonatology. 103 (4): 274–280. doi:10.1159/000347107. ISSN 1661-7819.
  2. “Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Congenital Syphilis”.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2]; Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[3]; Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[4]

Overview

Congenital syphilis can be classified into early (presenting 0-2 years) and late (greater 2 years) based upon on time of presentation. There is also a diagnostic classification of syphilis used for surveillance purpose.

Classification

Based upon Time of Presentation

Congenital syphilis is classified based on the timing of appearance of signs and symptoms into:[1]

  • Early congenital syphilis: If the signs and symptoms are identified in children aged less than 2 years. It is usually diagnosed in new born or in the first few weeks after birth.[2]
  • Late congenital syphilis: If the signs and symptoms of the disease are identified in children aged more than 2 years. The signs are usually non-specific and more than half the children are asymptomatic. They can present with interstitial keratitis, sensorineural deafness or clutton’s joints.
  • Stigmata: These are the scars resulting from early or late congenital syphilis. The features of stigmata in early congenital syphilis include saddle nose deformity, Hutchinson’s teeth, rhagades (linear scars at the angles of the mouth and nose result from bacterial infection of skin lesions), choriod scarring and onychia. Stigmata secondary to late congenital syphilis include perforation of the palate, corneal opacities, optic atrophy and periosteal changes of tibia.

Diagnostic Classification

The provisional case definition includes every infant (person <12 months of age) with one of the following:[3]

  • A reactive nontreponemal serologic test for syphilis confirmed by a reactive treponemal test.
  • A positive darkfield microscopic examination on a non oral mucous membrane or

All cases that are classified as confirmed or compatible or that require additional information to be classified should be reported to the state public health authority.

Confirmed Case

Compatible (formerly, probable or possible) Case

  • A reactive STS (serologic test for syphilis) in a stillborn.

OR

  • A reactive STS in an infant whose mother had syphilis during pregnancy and was not adequately treated, regardless of symptoms in the infant.

OR

OR

OR

  • Fourfold or greater rise in titers or nontreponemal tests (VDRL or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and a confirmed fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) or microhemagglutination assay for antibody to T. pallidum (MHA-TP) over a 3-month period.

OR

  • A reactive treponemal test or nontreponemal test that does not revert to nonreactive in 6 months.

Unlikely Case

  • No reactive STS.

OR

  • Treponemal tests revert to nonreactive within 6 months.

OR

  • No symptoms in live-born infant whose mother, treated for syphilis during pregnancy, had a fourfold or greater fall in titer and the infant’s STS is also fourfold or lower than the maternal titer was at the time of treatment.

References

  1. Balaji G, Kalaivani S (2013). “Observance of Kassowitz law-late congenital syphilis: Palatal perforation and saddle nose deformity as presenting features”. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 34 (1): 35–7. doi:10.4103/0253-7184.112869. PMC 3730472. PMID 23919053.
  2. Cavagnaro S M F, Pereira R T, Pérez P C, Vargas Del V F, Sandoval C C (2014). “[Early congenital syphilis: a case report]”. Rev Chil Pediatr. 85 (1): 86–93. doi:10.4067/S0370-41062014000100012. PMID 25079189.
  3. “Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Congenital Syphilis”. Retrieved 2012-12-20.

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Pathophysiology of congenital syphilis is still unclear. Several theories have been postulated in regards to the duration of the mother’s infection as well as the stage of pregnancy in which infection occurs.

Pathophysiology

Pahogenesis

  • Transmission to the fetus is primarily transplacental but it can also occur during delivery in the presence of maternal genital lesions.[1][2][3]
  • The risk of transmission to the fetus is dependent on the stage of the maternal disease (dependent on the spirochete concentration in the blood stream) and the duration of exposure to the fetus in utero.[4]
  • The risk of vertical transmission of syphilis from an infected untreated mother decreases as maternal disease duration progresses: transmission risk of 70–100% for primary syphilis and 40% for early latent syphilis to 10% for late latent disease. The variation in the percentages with the duration of infection is due to the concentration of spirochetes in the blood stream, which decrease with the duration of maternal syphilis infection.[5]
  • Kassowitz’s law describes the inverse relationship of interval between the disease and pregnancy. Longer the interval between infection and pregnancy more benign is the outcome.[6]
  • Transmission of infection typically takes place between the 16th and 28th week of pregnancy, however the transmission can be as early as the first trimester of pregnancy.[7]

References

  1. Wicher V, Wicher K (2001). “Pathogenesis of maternal-fetal syphilis revisited”. Clin Infect Dis. 33 (3): 354–63. doi:10.1086/321904. PMID 11438902.
  2. Domingues RM, Leal Mdo C (2016). “[Incidence of congenital syphilis and factors associated with vertical transmission: data from the Birth in Brazil study]”. Cad Saude Publica. 32 (6). doi:10.1590/0102-311X00082415. PMID 27333146.
  3. Peeling RW, Hook EW (2006). “The pathogenesis of syphilis: the Great Mimicker, revisited”. J Pathol. 208 (2): 224–32. doi:10.1002/path.1903. PMID 16362988.
  4. Berman SM (2004). “Maternal syphilis: pathophysiology and treatment”. Bull World Health Organ. 82 (6): 433–8. PMC 2622860. PMID 15356936.
  5. Genç M, Ledger WJ (2000). “Syphilis in pregnancy”. Sex Transm Infect. 76 (2): 73–9. PMC 1758294. PMID 10858706.
  6. Balaji G, Kalaivani S (2013). “Observance of Kassowitz law-late congenital syphilis: Palatal perforation and saddle nose deformity as presenting features”. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 34 (1): 35–7. doi:10.4103/0253-7184.112869. PMC 3730472. PMID 23919053.
  7. Harter C, Benirschke K (1976). “Fetal syphilis in the first trimester”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 124 (7): 705–11. PMID 56895.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2]Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Congenital syphilis is caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum, which is passed from mother to child during fetal development or at birth.

Causes

The causative pathogen for congenital syphilis is Treponema pallidum.

References

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Congenital Syphilis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Congenital syphilis must be differentiated from other TORCH infections.

Differential Diagnosis

The most important congenital infections, which can be transmitted vertically from mother to fetus are the TORCH infections. These infections have overlapping features and hence, must be differentiated from congenital syphilis :[1][2]

Congenital Infection Cardiac Findings Skin Findings Ocular Findings Hepatosplenomegaly Hydrocephalus Microcephaly Intracranial Calcifications Hearing deficits
Toxoplasmosis Diffuse intracranial calcifications
Congenital Syphils
Rubella
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Periventricular calcifications
Herpes simplex virus (HSV)
Parvovirus B19

References

  1. Neu N, Duchon J, Zachariah P (2015). “TORCH infections”. Clin Perinatol. 42 (1): 77–103, viii. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2014.11.001. PMID 25677998.
  2. Ajij M, Nangia S, Dubey BS (2014). “Congenital rubella syndrome with blueberry muffin lesions and extensive metaphysitis”. J Clin Diagn Res. 8 (12): PD03–4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/10271.5293. PMC 4316306. PMID 25654000.

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

Race

  • Congenital syphilis is ten times more prevalent in African American population compared to whites and three times more common in blacks compared to Hispanics.

References

  1. Peterman TA, Su J, Bernstein KT, Weinstock H (2015). “Syphilis in the United States: on the rise?”. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 13 (2): 161–8. doi:10.1586/14787210.2015.990384. PMID 25487961.
  2. Bowen V, Su J, Torrone E, Kidd S, Weinstock H (2015). “Increase in incidence of congenital syphilis – United States, 2012-2014”. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 64 (44): 1241–5. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6444a3. PMID 26562206.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Risk factors for congenital syphilis include all the risk factors which predispose a pregnant woman to have syphilis infection.

Risk Factors

Risk factors for congenital syphilis include all the risk factors which predispose a pregnant woman to have syphilis infection:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

References

  1. Rolfs RT, Goldberg M, Sharrar RG (1990). “Risk factors for syphilis: cocaine use and prostitution”. Am J Public Health. 80 (7): 853–7. PMC 1404975. PMID 2356911.
  2. Zhou H, Chen XS, Hong FC, Pan P, Yang F, Cai YM; et al. (2007). “Risk factors for syphilis infection among pregnant women: results of a case-control study in Shenzhen, China”. Sex Transm Infect. 83 (6): 476–80. doi:10.1136/sti.2007.026187. PMC 2598725. PMID 17675391.
  3. Hook EW, Peeling RW (2004). “Syphilis control–a continuing challenge”. N Engl J Med. 351 (2): 122–4. doi:10.1056/NEJMp048126. PMID 15247352.
  4. Buchacz K, Greenberg A, Onorato I, Janssen R (2005). “Syphilis epidemics and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence among men who have sex with men in the United States: implications for HIV prevention”. Sex Transm Dis. 32 (10 Suppl): S73–9. PMID 16205297.
  5. Solomon MM, Mayer KH (2015). “Evolution of the syphilis epidemic among men who have sex with men”. Sex Health. 12 (2): 96–102. doi:10.1071/SH14173. PMC 4470884. PMID 25514173.
  6. Hakre S, Arteaga GB, Núñez AE, Arambu N, Aumakhan B, Liu M; et al. (2014). “Prevalence of HIV, syphilis, and other sexually transmitted infections among MSM from three cities in Panama”. J Urban Health. 91 (4): 793–808. doi:10.1007/s11524-014-9885-4. PMC 4134449. PMID 24927712.
  7. Newell, J., et al. “A population-based study of syphilis and sexually transmitted disease syndromes in north-western Tanzania. 2. Risk factors and health seeking behaviour.” Genitourinary medicine 69.6 (1993): 421-426.

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Routine antenatal screening is recommended for syphilis.

Screening

Effective prevention and detection of congenital syphilis depends on the identification of syphilis in pregnant women and screening is a key component to decrease the incidence of congenital syphilis. The recommendations for screening are as follows:[1][2]

Screening Recommendations
Timing of Screening Test all pregnant women at the first prenatal visit.
Screening Tests

If screening tests are positive confirmatory tests should be done

High Risk Population

References

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2] Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Congenital syphilis is a result of transplacental transmission of the infection and severity of manifestations depend on the duration of maternal infection and duration of exposure to the fetus in utero.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease and is more prevalent in high risk population. Women with syphilis infection can transmit the infection to the fetus in utero resulting in a wide spectrum of outcomes. The risk of transmission is higher in pregnant women who do not undergo regular antenatal screening or in women who are untreated or adequately treated during the period of gestation. The risk of transmission to the fetus is dependent on the stage of syphilis infection in the mother (primary, secondary, tertiary or latent), duration of maternal infection and the exposure to fetus in utero. The transmission of infection typically occurs during the second trimester but early transmission also occurs. Syphilis can complicate the outcome of pregnancy and is dependent on the severity of infection in the fetus, severe infection has adverse outcomes in the new born.[1][2]

Complications

Prognosis

References

  1. Charles D (1983). “Syphilis”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 26 (1): 125–37. PMID 6340889.
  2. Qin, Jia-Bi; Feng, Tie-Jian; Yang, Tu-Bao; Hong, Fu-Chang; Lan, Li-Na; Zhang, Chun-Lai; Yang, Fan; Mamady, Keita; Dong, Willa (2014). “Risk Factors for Congenital Syphilis and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Offspring of Women With Syphilis in Shenzhen, China”. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 41 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000062. ISSN 0148-5717.
  3. Cohen SE, Klausner JD, Engelman J, Philip S (2013). “Syphilis in the modern era: an update for physicians”. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 27 (4): 705–22. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2013.08.005. PMID 24275265.
  4. Watson-Jones D, Gumodoka B, Weiss H, Changalucha J, Todd J, Mugeye K, Buvé A, Kanga Z, Ndeki L, Rusizoka M, Ross D, Marealle J, Balira R, Mabey D, Hayes R (2002). “Syphilis in pregnancy in Tanzania. II. The effectiveness of antenatal syphilis screening and single-dose benzathine penicillin treatment for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes”. J. Infect. Dis. 186 (7): 948–57. doi:10.1086/342951. PMID 12232835.
  5. Caddy SC, Lee BE, Sutherland K, Robinson JL, Plitt SS, Read R; et al. (2011). “Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of women with reactive syphilis serology in Alberta, 2002 to 2006”. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 33 (5): 453–9. PMID 21639965.

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters
External Links


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH