Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Intracerebral metastases

For patient information, click here.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor in Editor: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2], Sujit Routray, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Intracerebral metastasis; Brain metastasis; Brain metastases; Brain parenchymal metastasis; Brain parenchymal metastases; Cerebral metastasis; Cerebral metastases; Metastasis to brain; Metastases to brain; Metastasis to the brain; Metastases to the brain; Metastasis-Brain; Metastases-Brain; Metastatic brain tumor; Metastatic brain tumors; Metastatic brain cancer; Metastatic brain cancers; Metastatic brain neoplasm; Metastatic brain neoplasms; Secondary brain tumor; Secondary brain tumors; Secondary brain cancer; Secondary brain cancers; Secondary brain neoplasm; Secondary brain neoplasms; Intracranial metastases; Brain tumor

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

Overview

Intracerebral metastases are cancers that have metastasized to the brain from another location in the body.[1] Intracerebral metastases are different from the cancer that starts in the brain (called primary brain cancer). Primary brain tumors occur much less often than intracerebral metastases. It is estimated that 20–40% of intracerebral tumors are metastatic.[2] Cancers that start in the brain usually remain in one place (solitary mass). If there is more than one tumor in the brain, they are most probably intracerebral metastases. The ability of cancer cells to sever their link to the primary tumor site and commence the metastatic process, once specific functions have been acquired by an appropriate subset of cancer cells. The multistep cascade can be grouped into two stages: migration (intravasation, dissemination, and extravasation) and colonization.[3] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of intracerebral metastases include RHoC, LOX, VEGF, and CSF1.[3] On gross pathology, intracerebral metastases are characterized by single-to-multiple masses typically found in the watershed areas of the brain, that are sharply demarcated from the surrounding parenchyma and usually have a zone of peritumoral edema that is out of proportion with the tumor size.[4][5] On microscopic histopathological analysis, intracerebral metastases are characterized by tubule formation, well-circumscribed and sharply demarcated from surrounding tissues, with mitoses and nuclear atypia. Intracerebral metastases are demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers such as pankeratin, TTF-1, CK7, and CK20.[6] Common causes of intracerebral metastases include lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer.[7][8][3] Occasionally, cancer spreads to the brain but the original location of the cancer in the body (primary site) is not known. This is called cancer of unknown primary (CUP).[9][10] Intracranial metastases must be differentiated from glioblastoma multiforme, meningioma, primary CNS lymphoma, stroke, and epilepsy.[11][12] Intracerebral metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in adults, occurring in up to 30% of adult cancer patients.[5] They are estimated to account for approximately 25-50% of intracranial tumors in hospitalised patients.[13] The incidence of intracerebral metastases is estimated to be 200,000 cases annually in the United States.[14] The incidence of intracerebral metastases increases with age. The peak incidence occurs in patients over 65 years of age.[15] Intracerebral metastases affect men and women equally.[15] If left untreated, patients with intracerebral metastases may progress to develop seizures, altered mental status, hemiplegia, focal neurological deficits, hemorrhage, brain herniation, coma, and death.[16][11] Common complications of intracerebral metastases include brain herniation, hemorrhage, coma, and stroke. Depending on the type of the primary cancer, the age of the patient, absence or presence of extracranial metastases, and the number of metastatic sites in the brain at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor. The median survival time of all patients with intracerebral metastases is 2.3 months.[17][5] Symptoms of intracerebral metastases include headache, seizures, visual disturbances, cognitive dysfunction, paresthesia, and muscle weakness. Common physical examination findings of intracerebral metastases include bradycardia, high systolic blood pressure with widened pulse pressure, papilledema, altered mental status, ataxia, and focal neurological deficits.[18][11] Head CT scan and brain MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of intracerebral metastases. On CT scan, intracerebral metastases are characterized by iso- to hypodense mass with zero to marked peritumoral edema. On contrast administration, variable enhancement (intense, punctuate, nodular, or ring-enhanced) may be present.[19] On MRI, intracerebral metastases are characterized by iso- to hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense portion on T2-weighted imaging. On contrast administration, intense enhancement is observed (uniform, punctate, or ring-enhancing). Peritumoral edema which is out of proportion with tumor size is observed on diffusion weighted imaging.[20] Other imaging tests for intracerebral metastases include MR spectroscopy (intratumoural choline and lipid peak with depleted N-acetylaspartate), MR perfusion (reduced cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow in the region of metastasis), and positron emission tomography (hypermetabolic, hypometabolic, or variable metabolism depending on the primary).[20][21] Brain biopsy is done to confirm the diagnosis of intracerebral metastases, if the type of primary tumor is unknown or the etiology of the brain abnormality is unknown.[5] Histopathological findings on biopsy of intracerebral metastases can be found here.[22][23] The optimal therapy for intracerebral metastases depends on the number, size, and location of the metastatic lesions. The various treatment options for intracerebral metastases include symptomatic treatment (corticosteroids and anticonvulsants), whole brain radiotherapy, chemotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and surgery.[11][5][24][25][26]

Historical Perspective

Intracerebral metastases was first described by Posner and Chernik, following the largest and most comprehensive autopsy series at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1970 to 1976.[11]

Classification

There is no classification system established for intracerebral metastases.

Pathophysiology

Intracerebral metastases are different from the cancer that starts in the brain (called primary brain cancer). Primary brain tumors occur much less often than intracerebral metastases. It is estimated that 20–40% of intracerebral tumors are metastatic.[2] Cancers that start in the brain usually remain in one place (solitary mass). If there is more than one tumor in the brain, they are most probably intracerebral metastases. The ability of cancer cells to sever their link to the primary tumor site and commence the metastatic process, once specific functions have been acquired by an appropriate subset of cancer cells. The multistep cascade can be grouped into two stages: migration (intravasation, dissemination, and extravasation) and colonization.[3] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of intracerebral metastases include RHoC, LOX, VEGF, and CSF1.[3] On gross pathology, intracerebral metastases are characterized by single-to-multiple masses typically found in the watershed areas of the brain, that are sharply demarcated from the surrounding parenchyma and usually have a zone of peritumoral edema that is out of proportion with the tumor size.[4][5] On microscopic histopathological analysis, intracerebral metastases are characterized by tubule formation, well-circumscribed and sharply demarcated from surrounding tissues, with mitoses and nuclear atypia. Intracerebral metastases are demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers such as pankeratin, TTF-1, CK7, and CK20.[6]

Causes

Common causes of intracerebral metastases include lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer.[7][8][3] Occasionally, cancer spreads to the brain but the original location of the cancer in the body (primary site) is not known. This is called cancer of unknown primary (CUP).[9][10]

Differentiating Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma from other Diseases

Intracranial metastases must be differentiated from glioblastoma multiforme, meningioma, primary CNS lymphoma, stroke, and epilepsy.[11][12]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Intracerebral metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in adults, occurring in up to 30% of adult cancer patients.[5] They are estimated to account for approximately 25-50% of intracranial tumors in hospitalised patients.[13] The incidence of intracerebral metastases is estimated to be 200,000 cases annually in the United States.[14] The incidence of intracerebral metastases increases with age. The peak incidence occurs in patients over 65 years of age.[15] Intracerebral metastases affect men and women equally.[15]

Risk factors

The risk of developing intracerebral metastases depends on the type and location of the primary tumor. Primary tumors that are commonly associated with the development of brain metastasis include lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal carcinoma.[7][8][3]

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for intracerebral metastases.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, patients with intracerebral metastases may progress to develop seizures, altered mental status, hemiplegia, focal neurological deficits, hemorrhage, brain herniation, coma, and death.[16][11] Common complications of intracerebral metastases include brain herniation, hemorrhage, coma, and stroke. Depending on the type of the primary cancer, the age of the patient, absence or presence of extracranial metastases, and the number of metastatic sites in the brain at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor. The median survival time of all patients with intracerebral metastases is 2.3 months.[17][5]

Diagnosis

Staging

There is no established system for the staging of Intracerebral metastases.

History and Symptoms

When evaluating a patient for intracerebral metastases, you should take a detailed history of the presenting symptom (onset, duration, and progression), other associated symptoms, and a thorough family and past medical history review. Other specific areas of focus when obtaining the history include review of the primary tumor (lung, brain, melanoma, colorectal cancer).[7][8][3] 60-75% of patients with intracerebral metastases may be asymptomatic.[16] Symptoms of intracerebral metastases include headache, seizures, visual disturbances, cognitive dysfunction, paresthesia, and muscle weakness.[16][18][27][11]

Physical examination

Common physical examination findings of intracerebral metastases include bradycardia, high systolic blood pressure with widened pulse pressure, papilledema, altered mental status, ataxia, and focal neurological deficits.[18][11]

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with intracerebral metastases.

Chest X Ray

There are no chest x-ray findings associated with intracerebral metastases. However, a large mass may be observed on chest x-ray, which may be suggestive of the primary lung tumor.[28]

CT

Head CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of intracerebral metastases. On CT scan, intracerebral metastases are characterized by iso- to hypodense mass with zero to marked peritumoral edema. On contrast administration, variable enhancement (intense, punctuate, nodular, or ring-enhanced) may be present.[19]

MRI

Brain MRI is helpful in the diagnosis of intracerebral metastases. On MRI, intracerebral metastases are characterized by iso- to hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense portion on T2-weighted imaging. On contrast administration, intense enhancement is observed (uniform, punctate, or ring-enhancing). Peritumoral edema which is out of proportion with tumor size is observed on diffusion weighted imaging.[20]

Ultrasound

There are no ultrasound findings associated with intracerebral metastases.

Other Imaging Findings

Other imaging tests for intracerebral metastases include MR spectroscopy (intratumoural choline and lipid peak with depleted N-acetylaspartate), MR perfusion (reduced cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow in the region of metastasis), and positron emission tomography (hypermetabolic, hypometabolic, or variable metabolism depending on the primary).[20][21]

Other Diagnostic Studies

Brain biopsy is done to confirm the diagnosis of intracerebral metastases, if the type of primary tumor is unknown or the etiology of the brain abnormality is unknown.[5] Histopathological findings on biopsy of intracerebral metastases can be found here.[22][23]

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The optimal therapy for intracerebral metastases depends on the number, size, and location of the metastatic lesions. The various treatment options for intracerebral metastases include symptomatic treatment (corticosteroids and anticonvulsants), whole brain radiotherapy, chemotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and surgery.[11][5][24][25][26]

Surgery

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with intracerebral metastases. Surgical resection is usually reserved for patients with either a solitary brain metastasis or no extracranial spread of the primary tumor. Stereotactic radiosurgery is indicated if there are multiple (< 3) but small metastatic tumor masses.[29]

Primary Prevention

There are no primary preventive measures available for intracerebral metastases.

Secondary Prevention

There are no secondary preventive measures available for intracerebral metastases.

References

  1. Introduction to brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 17, 2015
  2. 2.0 2.1 Introduction to brain metastases. Canadian Cancer Society 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/?region=on. Accessed on November 13, 2015
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Gross appearance pathology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 16, 2015
  5. 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 Khuntia, Deepak (2015). “Contemporary Review of the Management of Brain Metastasis with Radiation”. Advances in Neuroscience. 2015: 1–13. doi:10.1155/2015/372856. ISSN 2356-6787.
  6. 6.0 6.1 IHC features of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Causes of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Epidemiology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  9. 9.0 9.1 Cancers that spread to the brain. Canadian Cancer Society 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/?region=on. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  10. 10.0 10.1 Fabi, Alessandra; Felici, Alessandra; Metro, Giulio; Mirri, Alessandra; Bria, Emilio; Telera, Stefano; Moscetti, Luca; Russillo, Michelangelo; Lanzetta, Gaetano; Mansueto, Giovanni; Pace, Andrea; Maschio, Marta; Vidiri, Antonello; Sperduti, Isabella; Cognetti, Francesco; Carapella, Carmine M (2011). “Brain metastases from solid tumors: disease outcome according to type of treatment and therapeutic resources of the treating center”. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 30 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-10. ISSN 1756-9966.
  11. 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 Andrew B. Lassman & Lisa M. DeAngelis (2003). “Brain metastases”. Neurologic clinics. 21 (1): 1–23. PMID 12690643. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. 12.0 12.1 Differential diagnosis of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  13. 13.0 13.1 Introduction to brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 16, 2015
  14. 14.0 14.1 Epidemiology of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Incidence of metastatic brain tumors. American Brain Tumor Association 2015. http://www.abta.org/secure/metastatic-brain-tumor.pdf. Accessed on November 16, 2015
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Clinical presentation of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  17. 17.0 17.1 Prognosis of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Symptoms of brain metastases. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  19. 19.0 19.1 Radiographic CT features of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. accessed on November 13, 2015
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Radiographic MRI features of brain metastasis. Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases
  21. 21.0 21.1 Nuclear medicine for brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 13, 2015
  22. 22.0 22.1 Microscopic features of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  23. 23.0 23.1 Microscopic appearance of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  24. 24.0 24.1 Symptomatic treatment of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  25. 25.0 25.1 Radiation therapy for intracerebral metastases. Canadian cancer institute 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/treatment/?region=on. Accessed on November 13, 2015
  26. 26.0 26.1 Symptomatic treatment of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  27. Symptoms of metastatic brain tumor. US national library of medicine 2015. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000769.htm. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  28. Bronchogenic carcinoma metastasis. Dr. Hani Al Salam. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/cases/bronchogenic-carcinoma-metastasis. Accessed on November 13, 2015
  29. Surgery of brain metastases. Canadian Cancer Society 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/treatment/?region=on. Accessed on November 13, 2015


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

Overview

Intracerebral metastases was first described by Posner and Chernik, following the largest and most comprehensive autopsy series at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1970 to 1976.[1]

Historical Perspective

  • Intracerebral metastases was first described by Posner and Chernik, following the largest and most comprehensive autopsy series at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1970 to 1976.[1]
  • More than a century ago, Stephen Paget advanced his “seed and soil” hypothesis, which suggests that the occurrence of intracerebral metastases is not random, but is secondary to certain tumor cells—“the seed”—having an attraction for the surrounding environment—“the soil”. The hypothesis envisages three principles: first, that the neoplasms are composed of heterogeneous subpopulations of cells, with different characteristics; second, that only a selectively “fit” subpopulation of cells will survive and multiply, invade, and migrate to other locations; and finally, that the colonization depends on tumor cell “seed” and host microenvironment “soil” interactions.[2]
  • According to Ewing, the circulatory patterns are responsible for the organ-specific spread between the primary tumor and their final destination.[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Andrew B. Lassman & Lisa M. DeAngelis (2003). “Brain metastases”. Neurologic clinics. 21 (1): 1–23. PMID 12690643. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

Overview

There is no classification system established for intracerebral metastases.

Classification

There is no classification system established for intracerebral metastases.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

Overview

Intracerebral metastases are different from the cancer that starts in the brain (called primary brain cancer). Primary brain tumors occur much less often than intracerebral metastases. It is estimated that 20–40% of intracerebral tumors are metastatic.[1] Cancers that start in the brain usually remain in one place (solitary mass). If there is more than one tumor in the brain, they are most probably intracerebral metastases. The ability of cancer cells to sever their link to the primary tumor site and commence the metastatic process, once specific functions have been acquired by an appropriate subset of cancer cells. The multistep cascade can be grouped into two stages: migration (intravasation, dissemination, and extravasation) and colonization.[2] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of intracerebral metastases include RHoC, LOX, VEGF, and CSF1.[2] On gross pathology, intracerebral metastases are characterized by single-to-multiple masses typically found in the watershed areas of the brain, that are sharply demarcated from the surrounding parenchyma and usually have a zone of peritumoral edema that is out of proportion with the tumor size.[3][4] On microscopic histopathological analysis, intracerebral metastases are characterized by tubule formation, well-circumscribed and sharply demarcated from surrounding tissues, with mitoses and nuclear atypia. Intracerebral metastases are demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers such as pankeratin, TTF-1, CK7, and CK20.[5]

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

  • Intracerebral metastases are different from the cancer that starts in the brain (called primary brain cancer). Primary brain tumors occur much less often than intracerebral metastases. It is estimated that 20–40% of intracerebral tumors are metastatic.[1]
  • Cancers that start in the brain usually remain in one place (solitary mass). If there is more than one tumor in the brain, they are most probably intracerebral metastases.
  • Parenchymal blood flow is an important determinant of the distribution of metastases to the brain.[6]
  • The ability of cancer cells to sever their link to the primary tumor site and commence the metastatic process, once specific functions have been acquired by an appropriate subset of cancer cells. The multistep cascade can be grouped into two stages: migration (intravasation, dissemination, and extravasation) and colonization.[2]
Migration Colonization
  • Cellular heterogeneity and proliferation
  • Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
  • Interactions with tumor stroma
  • Local Invasion
  • E-cadherin-catenin complex (ECCC), integrins, and other molecules
  • Genetic alterations
  • Dissemination
  • Organ-specific infiltration
  • The blood brain barrier, function of the brain microenvironment, and brain metastasis
  • Neoangiogenesis and proliferation
  • Cascade-nonspecific contributors to metastasis
  • Overview of microRNAs (miRNAs) and their emerging role in oncogenesis

Migration

1. Cellular heterogeneity and proliferation

  • The primary tumor consists of cancer cells which are genetically heterogeneous and have varying potentials to metastasize.[2]
  • These include the cell’s ability to invade adjacent tissues, initiate neoangiogenesis, disseminate, and adhere to new tissue substrates while expressing an affinity for the central nervous system.
  • Tumor cells have the ability to evade the structural organization present in normal tissues and cells.
  • In spite of being exposed to various environmental pressures (hypoxia and nutrient deprivation, low pH, immune and inflammatory mediators, poor blood supply), a subset of tumor cells survive these pressures with the ability to metastasize to distant sites.
  • Additionally, the tumor cells are able to evade growth suppressors, which limit cell growth and proliferation, as well as circumvent inhibitors of cell proliferation such as cell cycle checkpoint and DNA damage control systems.
  • The tumor cells can also resist apoptosis by the increased expression of antiapoptotic regulators (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL), survival signals (lgf 1/2), and downregulating proapoptotic factors (Bax, Bim, and Puma).
  • The primary tumor cells have the ability to acquire genetic and epigenetic mutations, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, allowing the fittest group of cells to survive.
  • The microRNA (miRNA) species interactions with pseudogenes may modify gene expression in cancer.
  • Various genetic mutations result in the ability of tumor cells to commence the proliferative process. Clonal expansion of these surviving fit cells leads to an acquisition of further changes, making subsequent cell lines progressively more carcinogenic.[2]
  • Observations within the primary tumor mass have revealed the presence of heterogeneous cell lines including cancer stem cells (CSCs), partially differentiated progenitor cells, and fully differentiated end-stage cells.
  • These appear to recapitulate the same hierarchal patterns in normal tissue types but in an uncontrolled manner.
  • These CSCs may be the primary drivers of the enhanced malignant potential of primary tumors, giving origin to their aggressive phenotypes with the ability to degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM), invade blood vessels and lymph nodes, migrate, extravasate, colonize, and renew themselves at their new locations.
  • These CSCs can reside in clusters or niches, at two or more locations within the primary tumor cell mass.
  • Thus, the key role a cancer stem cell plays in the metastatic cascade cannot be overstated, due to its ability to initiate tumor proliferation and “self-renew” itself at alternative tissue locations. Other observations reveal that, in addition to the abilities discussed, they are also motile, invasive, and are resilient to the apoptotic process.

2. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

  • The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) describes a temporary, reversible phenomenon wherein cells can dedifferentiate, migrate to a distant focus, and then redifferentiate back to their original cell, forming a new structure.[2]
  • Signals activating the EMT can be intrinsic such as gene mutations and extrinsic such as growth factor signaling.
  • Transdifferentiation appears to be initiated by release of certain EMT-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TFs) that transform epithelial cells into mesenchymal derivatives, giving these cells the capacity to invade, resist apoptosis, and disseminate.
  • Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and members of the notch signaling family play a role in inducing the EMT pathway.
  • The EMT program enables non-CSCs to derive characteristics of the CSC state, which enables them to invade and disseminate from the primary tumor to a distant, metastatic focus.
  • Some of these traits include the ability to loosen adherent junctions, express matrix-degrading enzymes, resist apoptosis, and to undergo morphological conversion.
  • Using the EMT program, cancer cells can, transiently or for longer time frames, activate themselves and acquire attributes critical to survival and dissemination. To activate the EMT, a certain amount of crosstalk has to exist between the tumor cells and adjacent stromal cells, which are done by various EMT-TFs and signals from within the adjacent tumor stroma.

3. Interactions with tumor stroma

4. Local invasion

  • Once the phenotypically aggressive clone has developed, spread of the tumor consists of a series of two sequential steps: namely, invasion of the extracellular matrix (ECM) with penetration into the vasculature and hematogenous dissemination to the central nervous system. Tumor expansion causes adjacent ECM compression and modifies lymphatic and blood vessel flow, eventually leading to basement membrane (BM) thinning. Combined with the various molecular and cellular events, this leads to eventual tumor metastasis.
  • To reach the circulation, tumor cells must penetrate the basement membrane, traverse the extracellular connective tissue matrix (ECM) tissue, and then breach the vascular basement membrane (VBM) to enter the circulation.[2]
  • The process is dependent on a number of protein complexes that regulate cellular interactions and proteolytic enzymes, with degradation of the ECM, which permits extravasation.

5. E-cadherin-catenin complex (ECCC), integrins, and other molecules

  • The E-cadherincatenin molecular complex is essential to maintain a normal and tumoral cytoarchitecture.[2]
  • It is a necessary mediator of cell-cell adhesion that, among other functions, determines the polarity of normal (and tumor) cells and their organization into tissues.
  • Cadherin molecules are integral cell membrane glycoproteins that interact in a homophilic manner with one another.
  • They have a stable extracellular fragment and possess a cytoplasmic undercoat protein of one or more proteins called catenins.
  • In the process of tumor metastasis, tumor clones become discohesive, fail to adhere to one another, and develop a more disordered cytoarchitecture which allows these cells to separate from the tumor mass.
  • E-cadherin maintains cell adhesion by anchoring its cytoplasmic domain to actin cytoskeleton via α-catenin and β-catenin.
  • Infiltrating malignancies have mutations in the genes for α-catenin, β-catenins, and E-cadherin, thus decreasing the expression of this complex. This has been correlated with invasion, metastasis, and an unfavorable prognosis.
  • Furthermore, DNA hypermethylation of the promoter region of E-cadherin can diminish or silence its expression, thereby disturbing ECCC function, and is a common event in intracerebral metastases.
  • N-cadherin is another molecule connected to the cellular cytoskeleton via α-catenin and β-catenins in a manner similar to E-cadherin.
  • One of the hallmarks of the EMT described above is a cadherin switch, with loss of epithelial E-cadherin and gain of mesenchymal N-cadherin functions. This induces loss of epithelial cellular affinity, while at the same time increasing the affinity of cells for the mesenchymal cells like fibroblasts. Gain-of-function mutations in N-cadherin also trigger increased migration and invasion in tumors.
  • Integrins are another family of major adhesion and signaling receptor proteins linking the ECM to the cellular actin cytoskeletal structure called focal adhesions and play an important role in mediating cell migration and invasion. They trigger a variety of signal transduction pathways and regulate cytoskeletal organization, specific gene expression, control of growth, and apoptosis.
  • Integrins induce the release of a key mediator in signaling known as focal adhesion kinase (FAK). FAK is a ubiquitously expressed nonreceptor cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, thought to play a key role in migration and proliferation, by providing abnormal signals for survival, EMT, invasion, and angiogenesis. FAK may also play an important role in the regulation of CSCs. Dephosphorylation and inhibition of FAK at the Y397 locus via the activated Ras oncogene promotes tumor migration by facilitating focal adhesion at the leading edge of tumor cells.
  • The ability of tumor cells to escape the primary site is dependent on their ability to remodel the ECM. This remodeling occurs by breaking down or degrading the ECM via proteolytic enzymes, thus creating a pathway for invasion. The advancing edge of tumor cells posses the ability to carry out this proteolytic activity by releasing signals that promote cell proliferation and angiogenesis in the metastatic cascade. Neurotrophins (NTs) promote brain invasion by enhancing the production of heparinase, which is an ECM proteolytic enzyme. Heparinase is a β-d-glucuronidase that cleaves the heparin sulfate chain of the ECM. It is the prominent heparin sulfate degradative enzyme and is known to destroy both the ECM and the blood-brain barrier. Evidence suggests the presence of NTs at the tumor-brain interface in melanomas, and reports have suggested a role for the p75 NT receptor in brain metastasis.
  • Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are members of a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that function at physiological pH and help remodeling human connective tissue at low levels. About 25 human family members have been identified, and they have been grouped according to their substrate on which they act, namely collagenase, stromelysin, matrilysin, and gelatinase.
  • They also play a critical role in the EMT and tumor microenvironment. Cytokines and inducers present on the surface of tumor cells in the ECM regulate their expression.
  • Once these MMPs are induced and stimulated, they aid in breakdown of type I collagen, fibronectin, and laminin in the ECM and enhance tumor cell migration. MMP activity correlates with invasiveness, metastasis, and poor prognosis.
  • MMP-2 may be identified in all intracerebral metastases regardless of site of origin. Moreover, MMP-2 activity correlated inversely with survival.
  • The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system consists of uPA, its receptor (uPAR), and plasminogen. The uPA binds to the receptor uPA-R (CD87), the activity of which is regulated by the action of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 and 2 (PAI-1/2) on the cell membrane and causes urokinase to convert plasminogen to plasmin.
  • The proteolytic activity of plasmin then degrades components of the ECM including fibrin, fibronectin, proteoglycans, and laminin. Further, plasmin activates other proteolytic enzymes with resultant local invasion and migration. There is a high level of uPA in metastatic tumors, correlates with necrosis and edema, and there is an inverse correlation with a tumor’s levels of uPA and survival. Additionally, high levels of uPA and absent tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) correlate with aggressiveness and decreased survival.
  • More recent evidence describes the role of “invadopodia”, which are three-dimensional protrusive processes, compared to the two-dimensional lamellipodia and filopodia, in metastatic invasion. Invadopodia appear to share a number of structural and functional features with filopodia, but spatially focus on proteolytic secretion, remodeling the ECM matrix, and establishing tracts supporting subsequent invasion.
  • Integrins play a major role in organizing the components, triggering the formation of invadopodia. α3β1 activation promotes Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP, via RhoGTPases family, which activates invadopodia and invasion.
  • Integrins also appear to focus proteolytic activity to the region of these processes, as in melanoma cells, where collagen-induced α3β1 association with the serine protease “seprase” (surface-expressed protease) enhances the activity of matrix-degrading enzymes focally at the invadopodia.
  • Numerous cancer cell lines such as melanoma, breast cancer, glioma, and head and neck cancer have shown the presence of invadopodia. A number of other molecules, such as EGF, HGF, or TGF-β can induce their formation as well.
  • The release of tumor-released chemokines such as CSF-1 and PIGF attract tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) to the microenvironment, which in turn release multiple factors stimulating invadopodia. In addition, a family of proteins called aquaporins may also facilitate migration.
  • Aquaporin-dependent tumor angiogenesis and metastases enhance water transport in the lamellipodia of migrating cells.
  • Studies on brain-specific breast metastasis reveal that increased expression of KCNMA1, a gene encoding for a big conductance type potassium channel (BKCa) that is upregulated in breast cancer, leads to greater invasiveness and transendothelial migration.

6. Genetic Alterations

  • Several known tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) function at the level of escape and migration/intravasation. The best known of these is the KiSS1 gene on chromosome 1.
  • KiSS1 encodes metastin, which is a ligand of the orphan G protein couples receptor hOT7T175. Lee et al. have found that the forced expression of KiSS1 suppressed both melanoma and breast metastasis.
  • KAI1 (CD82), a TSG on chromosome 11p11.2, regulates adhesion, migration, growth, and differentiation of tumor cell lines.
  • KAI1 expression is inversely correlated with prostate cancer progression as well as breast and melanoma metastasis. Additionally, KAI1 is known to be associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is thought to affect the Rho GTPase pathway resulting in suppression of lamellipodia formation and migration.
  • Hypermethylation of the TSG DRG1 inhibits both liver metastasis and colorectal carcinoma invasion. Conversely, overexpression of DRG1 has been linked to resistance to irinotecan chemotherapy.
  • In addition to the suppressor genes responsible for invasion and metastasis, there are a number of promoter genes responsible for invasion and metastasis as well.
  • Genetic activation or inactivation of promoter/suppressor genes in human cancer can be the result of mutations, deletions, loss of heterozygosity, multiplication, and translocation.
  • The same genes that are responsible for normal cellular functioning, signaling, signal transduction, modulating, and mediating cellular response are frequently the genes that enhance invasion and metastasis when altered by genetic or epigenetic dysfunction.
  • These changes within the primary tumor microenvironment give rise to an “active seed” ready to implant itself in a fertile environmental “soil”. These cellular modifications enable the next steps of migration (dissemination and extravasation).

7. Dissemination

  • Once a cancer cell has breached its microenvironment and arrived at the vasculature (intracerebral metastasis) or lymphatic system (other sites), the tumor cell must survive its exposure to high shear forces and varied stress patterns.
  • Tumor cells respond by reenforcing their cytoskeleton and increasing the ability to adhere to the vascular wall.
  • On adhering to endothelium of target tissue, the tumor cells behave like macrophages, creating pseudopodia and penetrating the cell-cell junctions, driven by dynamic remodeling of the cellular cytoskeleton.
  • There are a subset of circulating tumor cells which maintain their physical plasticity and although much larger in diameter (20–30 μ) than lung capillaries (~8 μ), can survive the sieving action of lung capillaries. These cells can be found either growing as clumps in the lung or colonizing other organ sites. Cancer cells in circulation appear to attract platelets because of their expressed surface tissue proteins and these protect the cells from the immune system.
  • Once these mobile cancer cells get lodged in a secondary organ tissue site, there are two pathways for colonization. One is mediated by cellular diapedesis, extravasation, and proliferation of the tumor cell mass, whereas the other consists of accumulation of tumor cells within the site of obstruction in the foreign tissue vascular bed, wherein they proliferate prior to their rupture into the adjacent stroma where they begin to grow.

Colonization

1. Organ-specific infiltration

  • Subsequent to intravasation and dissemination, special mechanisms are necessary to extravasate and colonize secondary sites.
  • The metastatic deposits occur in certain organ tissues because of the influence of hematogenous dynamics, for example, colon cancer metastasis preferentially metastasizing to the liver because of mesenteric circulation and large vascular sinusoids.
  • The overexpression of the cell adhesion molecule, metadherin, in breast cancer makes it easier for tumor cells to target and adhere to endothelial lining in the lung parenchyma, making it possible for these endothelial-adhesive interactions to enhance the possibility of brain metastasis.
  • Although the exact causes of preferential metastatic sites have not been clearly elucidated, one theory states that direct neurotropic interactions with yet undiscovered brain homing mechanisms result in intracerebral metastases. “Vascular co-option”, a term put forward by Carbonell et al., describes the ability of metastatic cells to grow along the preexisting vessels much before overt secondaries are detected. Once adherent to the vascular basement membrane, the tumor cells can extravasate into the parenchyma, the vascular basement membrane thus being the “soil” for intracerebral metastases. Saito et al. demonstrated that the pia-glial membrane along the external surface of blood vessels serves as a scaffold for the angiocentric spread of metastatic cells.
  • The tumor cells function like macrophages within the vasculature and during extravasation, express CD11b, Iba1, F4/80, CD68, CD45, and CXCR which are proteins normally expressed specifically by the macrophages. The ability of the tumor cells to mimic macrophages may enable them to evade the immune system while in the vasculature.

2. The blood brain barrier, function of the brain microenvironment, and brain metastasis

  • Passage of the tumor cells across the blood-brain barrier occurs via mechanisms which have not yet been delineated fully.
  • Recently, three proteins that mediate breast metastasis to the brain and lungs have been described, cyclooxygenase 2 or COX2 (also known as PTGS2), EGFR, ligand and heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HBEGF). These proteins facilitate extravasation through nonfenestrated blood vessels and enhance colonization.
  • Other molecules targeting organ specific colonization may also be expressed by the cancer cells. These molecules include ezrin (an intracellular protein necessary for the survival of osteosarcoma cells in the lung) and serine-threonine kinase 11 (STK11 or LKB1, a metastasis suppressor gene which regulates NEDD9 in lung cancer).

3. Neoangiogenesis and proliferation

  • A key component of both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumor growth at any site is angiogenesis. The growth may occur by utilizing preexisting vasculature or co-opting these vessels rather than inducing new vessel formation (neoangiogenesis).
  • Kusters et al. observed that growth of the melanoma metastatic tumor up to 3 mm could occur without inducing the angiogenic switch.
  • Carbonell et al. have also observed that beta-1 integrin, expressed by the metastatic tumor cell line, is the key molecule to co-opt adjacent blood vessels to the growing tumor.
  • Various angiogenic factors have been scrutinized as viable targets for treatment. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most commonly recognized angiogenic factor. VEGF expression in breast cancer plays a role in metastasis and inhibition with a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor-reduced growth and angiogenesis.
  • MMP-9/gelatinase B complex, a member of the MMP family and PAI-1, a uPA cell surface receptor may play roles in angiogenesis. The role in angiogenesis and uniqueness of plexin D1 (PLXND1) expression was explored in the tumor cells and vasculogenesis. Neoplastic cells expressed plexin D1 as well as tumor vasculature, while its expression in nonneoplastic tissue was restricted to a small subset of activated macrophages, which suggests that plexin D1 may play a significant role in tumor angiogenesis.
  • Overexpression of hexokinase 2 (HK2), which plays a key role in glucose metabolism and apoptosis, may also influence intracerebral metastases in breast and other cancers. It has been observed that both mRNA and protein levels of HK2 are elevated in intracerebral metastatic derivative cell lines compared to the parental cell line in vitro. Knockdown of expression reduced cell proliferation, which implies that HK2 contributes to the proliferation and growth of breast cancer metastasis. Finally, increased expression of HK2 is associated with poor survival after craniotomy.
  • At least two tumor suppressor genes that function at the proliferation level of the metastatic cascade have been described. The first, NM23 regulates cell growth by encoding for a nucleotide diphosphate protein kinase that interacts with menin, a protein encoded by MEN1. NM23 is thought to reduce signal transduction and thereby decrease anchorage independent colonization, invasion, and motility. In melanoma, decreased expression is correlated with increased brain metastasis.
  • Another tumor suppressor gene, BRMS1, located at 11q13, is altered in many melanomas and breast cancers. BRMS1 prevents disseminated tumor cell growth by restoring the normal gap junction phenotype and maintaining cell-to-cell communication in the primary tumor. Seraj et al. found an inverse correlation between the expression of BRMS1 and the metastatic potential in melanoma.

4. Cascade-nonspecific contributors to metastasis

  • There are certain molecular contributions that cannot be attributed to a specific step in the cascade, either because they are active at every level. Zeb-1, the zinc finger E-box homeobox transcription factor, is overexpressed in metastatic cancers.
  • This overexpression leads to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and increased metastasis.
  • Mutation of Zeb-1 leads to decrease in the proliferation of progenitor cells.

5. Overview of microRNAs (miRNAs) and their emerging role in oncogenesis

  • There is an important role of microRNAs in cell and tissue development, proliferation, and motility via their ability to repress mRNA translation or induce mRNA degradation.
  • The dysregulated expression of a single miRNA can cause a cascade of silencing events capable of eliciting disease development in humans, which includes cancer.

Genetics

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of intracerebral metastases are tabulated below:[2]

Gene Cancer site (primary) Role and implications Chromosome location
RHoC Melanoma
Regulates remodeling of actin cytoskeleton during morphogenesis and motility
Important in tumor cell invasion
1p21-p13
LOX

Breast
Head and neck cancer

Increases invasiveness of hypoxic human cancer cells through cell matrix adhesion and focal adhesion kinase activity
5q23.1-q23.2
VEGF

Lung
Breast
Melanoma
Colon

Angiogenic growth factor
Inhibition decreases brain metastasis formation; reduces blood vessel formation and cell proliferation; increases apoptosis
6p21.1
CSF1

Breast
Lung

Stimulate macrophage proliferation and subsequent release of growth factors
1p13.3
ID1

Breast
Lung

Involved in matrix remodeling, intracellular signaling, and angiogenesis
20q11.21
TWIST1

Breast
Gastric
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Melanoma
Hepatocellular

Causes loss of E-cadherin mediated cell-cell adhesion, activates mesenchymal markers, and induces cell motility by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition
7p21.1
MET Renal cell cancer
Affects a wide range of biological activity depending on the cell target, varying from mitogenesis, morphogenesis, and motogenesis
7q31.2
MMP-9

Colorectal
Breast
Melanoma
Chondrosarcoma

Extracellular matrix degradation, tissue remodeling
20q13.12
NEDD9 Melanoma
Acquisition of a metastatic potential
6p24.2
LEF1 Lung
Transcriptional effecter—WNT pathway; predilection for brain metastasis
Knockdown inhibits brain metastasis, decreases colony formation; in vitro decreases invasion
4q25
HOXB9

Lung
Breast

Homeobox gene family; critical for embryonic segmentation and patterning. Also a TCF4 target
Knockdown in vitro decreased invasion and colony formation; in vivo appears to inhibit brain metastasis
17q21.32
BMP4

Lung
Colorectal

Plays an essential role in embryonic development and may be an essential component of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition
14q22.2
STAT3 Melanoma
Cell signaling transcription factor
Reduction suppresses brain metastasis; decreases angiogenesis in vivo and cellular invasion in vitro
17q21.2

Gross Pathology

  • On gross pathology, intracerebral metastases are characterized by single-to-multiple masses typically found in the watershed areas of the brain, that are sharply demarcated from the surrounding parenchyma and usually have a zone of peritumoral edema that is out of proportion with the tumor size.[3][4]
  • Common intracranial sites associated with intracerebral metastases include:[4]

Microscopic Pathology

The histopathological appearance of intracerebral metastases may vary with the type of primary tumor. Common findings are listed below:[8][9]

  • Tubule formation/glands
  • Well-circumscribed and sharply demarcated from surrounding tissue (with the exception of melanoma metastasis)
  • Mitoses
  • Nuclear atypia
  • Nuclear hyperchromasia
  • Variation of nuclear size
  • Variation of nuclear shape

Immunohistochemistry

  • The immunohistochemistry profile of intracerebral metastases may vary with the type of the primary tumor.[5]
  • Intracerebral metastases are demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers such as:[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Introduction to brain metastases. Canadian Cancer Society 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/?region=on. Accessed on November 13, 2015
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Gross appearance pathology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 16, 2015
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Khuntia, Deepak (2015). “Contemporary Review of the Management of Brain Metastasis with Radiation”. Advances in Neuroscience. 2015: 1–13. doi:10.1155/2015/372856. ISSN 2356-6787.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 IHC features of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  6. Epidemiology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 17, 2015
  7. Gross image of brain metastases. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  8. Microscopic features of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  9. Microscopic appearance of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Microscopic images of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015
  11. IHC image of brain metastasis. Libre pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 10, 2015


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

Overview

Common causes of intracerebral metastases include lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer.[1][2][3] Occasionally, cancer spreads to the brain but the original location of the cancer in the body (primary site) is not known. This is called cancer of unknown primary (CUP).[4][5]

Causes

  • Common causes of intracerebral metastases include:[1][2][3]
  • Occasionally, cancer spreads to the brain but the original location of the cancer in the body (primary site) is not known. This is called cancer of unknown primary (CUP).[4][5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Causes of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  2. 2.0 2.1 Epidemiology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  3. 3.0 3.1 Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Cancers that spread to the brain. Canadian Cancer Society 2015. http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/metastatic-cancer/brain-metastases/?region=on. Accessed on November 9, 2015
  5. 5.0 5.1 Fabi, Alessandra; Felici, Alessandra; Metro, Giulio; Mirri, Alessandra; Bria, Emilio; Telera, Stefano; Moscetti, Luca; Russillo, Michelangelo; Lanzetta, Gaetano; Mansueto, Giovanni; Pace, Andrea; Maschio, Marta; Vidiri, Antonello; Sperduti, Isabella; Cognetti, Francesco; Carapella, Carmine M (2011). “Brain metastases from solid tumors: disease outcome according to type of treatment and therapeutic resources of the treating center”. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 30 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-10. ISSN 1756-9966.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Intracerebral Metastases from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahimeh Shojaei, M.D.

Overview

On the basis of seizure, visual disturbance, and constitutional symptoms, intracerebral metastasesmust be differentiated from oligodendroglioma, meningioma, hemangioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, schwannoma, primary CNS lymphoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pinealoma, AV malformation, brain aneurysm, bacterial brain abscess, tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, hydatid cyst, CNS cryptococcosis, CNS aspergillosis, and astrocytoma.

Differentiating intracerebral metastases from other Diseases

Differentiating intracerebral metastases from other diseases on the basis of seizure, visual disturbance, and constitutional symptoms

On the basis of seizure, visual disturbance, and constitutional symptoms, intracerebral metastasesmust be differentiated from oligodendroglioma, meningioma, hemangioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, schwannoma, primary CNS lymphoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pinealoma, AV malformation, brain aneurysm, bacterial brain abscess, tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, hydatid cyst, CNS cryptococcosis, CNS aspergillosis, and astrocytoma.

Diseases Clinical manifestations Para-clinical findings Gold
standard
Additional findings
Symptoms Physical examination
Lab Findings MRI Immunohistopathology
Head-
ache
Seizure Visual disturbance Constitutional Focal neurological deficit
Other
Brain metastasis
[1][2]
+ +/− +/− + +
  • Based on the primary cancer type we may have different immunohistopathology findings.
  • History/ imaging
Childhood primary brain tumors
Pilocytic astrocytoma
[3][4][5]
+ +/− +/− +
Medulloblastoma
[6][7][8]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Homer wright rosettes
Ependymoma
[9][2]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Causes an unusually persistent, continuous headache in children.
Craniopharyngioma
[10][11][12][2]
+ +/− + Bitemporal hemianopia +
Pinealoma
[13][14][15]
+ +/− +/− + vertical gaze palsy
  • May cause prinaud syndrome (vertical gaze palsy, pupillary light-near dissociation, lid retraction and convergence-retraction nystagmus
Adult primary brain tumors
Glioblastoma multiforme
[16][17][2]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Pseudopalisading appearance
Oligodendroglioma
[18][19][20]
+ + +/− +
  • Chicken wire capillary pattern
  • Fried egg cell appearance
Meningioma
[21][22][23]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Well circumscribed
  • Extra-axial mass
  • Whorled spindle cell pattern
  • May be associated with NF-2
Hemangioblastoma
[24][25][26][27]
+ +/− +/− +
Pituitary adenoma
[28][29][2]
+ Bitemporal hemianopia
  • It is associated with MEN1 disease.
      Schwannoma
      [30][31][32][33]
      +
      • Split-fat sign
      • Fascicular sign
      • Often have areas of hemosiderin
      • S100+
      Primary CNS lymphoma
      [34][35]
      + +/− +/− +
      • Single mass with ring enhancement
        Vascular
        AV malformation
        [36][37][2]
        + + +/− +/−
        Brain aneurysm
        [38][39][40][41][42]
        + +/− +/− +/−
        • MRA and CTA
        Infectious
        Bacterial brain abscess
        [43][44]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Central hypodense signal and surrounding ring-enhancement in T1
        • Central hyperintense area surrounded by a well-defined hypointense capsule with surrounding edema in T2
        • History/ imaging
        Tuberculosis
        [45][2][46]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Lab data/ Imaging
        Toxoplasmosis
        [47][48]
        + +/− +/− +
        • History/ imaging
        Hydatid cyst
        [49][2]
        + +/− +/− +/− +
        • Imaging
        CNS cryptococcosis
        [50]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • We may see numerous acutely branching septate hyphae
        • Lab data/ Imaging
        CNS aspergillosis
        [51]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Multiple abscesses
        • Ring enhancement
        • Peripheral low signal intensity on T2
        • We may see numerous acutely branching septate hyphae
        • Lab data/ Imaging

        ABBREVIATIONS

        CNS=Central nervous system, AV=Arteriovenous, CSF=Cerebrospinal fluid, NF-2=Neurofibromatosis type 2, MEN-1=Multiple endocrine neoplasia, GFAP=Glial fibrillary acidic protein, HIV=Human immunodeficiency virus, BhCG=Human chorionic gonadotropin, ESR=Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, AFB=Acid fast bacilli, MRA=Magnetic resonance angiography, CTA=CT angiography

        References

        1. Pope WB (2018). “Brain metastases: neuroimaging”. Handb Clin Neurol. 149: 89–112. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4. PMC 6118134. PMID 29307364.
        2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
        3. Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
        4. Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
        5. Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
        6. Dorwart, R H; Wara, W M; Norman, D; Levin, V A (1981). “Complete myelographic evaluation of spinal metastases from medulloblastoma”. Radiology. 139 (2): 403–408. doi:10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220886. ISSN 0033-8419.
        7. Fruehwald-Pallamar, Julia; Puchner, Stefan B.; Rossi, Andrea; Garre, Maria L.; Cama, Armando; Koelblinger, Claus; Osborn, Anne G.; Thurnher, Majda M. (2011). “Magnetic resonance imaging spectrum of medulloblastoma”. Neuroradiology. 53 (6): 387–396. doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0829-8. ISSN 0028-3940.
        8. Burger, P. C.; Grahmann, F. C.; Bliestle, A.; Kleihues, P. (1987). “Differentiation in the medulloblastoma”. Acta Neuropathologica. 73 (2): 115–123. doi:10.1007/BF00693776. ISSN 0001-6322.
        9. Yuh, E. L.; Barkovich, A. J.; Gupta, N. (2009). “Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT”. Child’s Nervous System. 25 (10): 1203–1213. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0878-7. ISSN 0256-7040.
        10. Brunel H, Raybaud C, Peretti-Viton P, Lena G, Girard N, Paz-Paredes A, Levrier O, Farnarier P, Manera L, Choux M (September 2002). “[Craniopharyngioma in children: MRI study of 43 cases]”. Neurochirurgie (in French). 48 (4): 309–18. PMID 12407316.
        11. Prabhu, Vikram C.; Brown, Henry G. (2005). “The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas”. Child’s Nervous System. 21 (8–9): 622–627. doi:10.1007/s00381-005-1190-9. ISSN 0256-7040.
        12. Kennedy HB, Smith RJ (December 1975). “Eye signs in craniopharyngioma”. Br J Ophthalmol. 59 (12): 689–95. PMC 1017436. PMID 766825.
        13. Ahmed SR, Shalet SM, Price DA, Pearson D (September 1983). “Human chorionic gonadotrophin secreting pineal germinoma and precocious puberty”. Arch. Dis. Child. 58 (9): 743–5. PMID 6625640.
        14. Sano, Keiji (1976). “Pinealoma in Children”. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1159/000119602. ISSN 1016-2291.
        15. Baggenstoss, Archie H. (1939). “PINEALOMAS”. Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry. 41 (6): 1187. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1939.02270180115011. ISSN 0096-6754.
        16. Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
        17. Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
        18. Smits M (2016). “Imaging of oligodendroglioma”. Br J Radiol. 89 (1060): 20150857. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150857. PMC 4846213. PMID 26849038.
        19. Wesseling P, van den Bent M, Perry A (June 2015). “Oligodendroglioma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers”. Acta Neuropathol. 129 (6): 809–27. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1424-1. PMC 4436696. PMID 25943885.
        20. Kerkhof M, Benit C, Duran-Pena A, Vecht CJ (2015). “Seizures in oligodendroglial tumors”. CNS Oncol. 4 (5): 347–56. doi:10.2217/cns.15.29. PMC 6082346. PMID 26478444.
        21. Zee CS, Chin T, Segall HD, Destian S, Ahmadi J (June 1992). “Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas”. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 13 (3): 154–69. PMID 1642904.
        22. Shibuya M (2015). “Pathology and molecular genetics of meningioma: recent advances”. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 55 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0233. PMID 25744347.
        23. Begnami MD, Palau M, Rushing EJ, Santi M, Quezado M (September 2007). “Evaluation of NF2 gene deletion in sporadic schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas by chromogenic in situ hybridization”. Hum. Pathol. 38 (9): 1345–50. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.027. PMC 2094208. PMID 17509660.
        24. Lonser RR, Butman JA, Huntoon K, Asthagiri AR, Wu T, Bakhtian KD, Chew EY, Zhuang Z, Linehan WM, Oldfield EH (May 2014). “Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease”. J. Neurosurg. 120 (5): 1055–62. doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131431. PMC 4762041. PMID 24579662.
        25. Hussein MR (October 2007). “Central nervous system capillary haemangioblastoma: the pathologist’s viewpoint”. Int J Exp Pathol. 88 (5): 311–24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2007.00535.x. PMC 2517334. PMID 17877533.
        26. Lee SR, Sanches J, Mark AS, Dillon WP, Norman D, Newton TH (May 1989). “Posterior fossa hemangioblastomas: MR imaging”. Radiology. 171 (2): 463–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704812. PMID 2704812.
        27. Perks WH, Cross JN, Sivapragasam S, Johnson P (March 1976). “Supratentorial haemangioblastoma with polycythaemia”. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 39 (3): 218–20. PMID 945331.
        28. Kucharczyk W, Davis DO, Kelly WM, Sze G, Norman D, Newton TH (December 1986). “Pituitary adenomas: high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T”. Radiology. 161 (3): 761–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786729. PMID 3786729.
        29. Syro LV, Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Toledo RA, Londoño FJ, Ortiz LD, Rotondo F, Horvath E, Uribe H (2012). “Pituitary tumors in patients with MEN1 syndrome”. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 67 Suppl 1: 43–8. PMC 3328811. PMID 22584705.
        30. Donnelly, Martin J.; Daly, Carmel A.; Briggs, Robert J. S. (2007). “MR imaging features of an intracochlear acoustic schwannoma”. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 108 (12). doi:10.1017/S0022215100129056. ISSN 0022-2151.
        31. Feany MB, Anthony DC, Fletcher CD (May 1998). “Nerve sheath tumours with hybrid features of neurofibroma and schwannoma: a conceptual challenge”. Histopathology. 32 (5): 405–10. PMID 9639114.
        32. Chen H, Xue L, Wang H, Wang Z, Wu H (July 2017). “Differential NF2 Gene Status in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas and its Prognostic Impact on Tumour Growth Patterns”. Sci Rep. 7 (1): 5470. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05769-0. PMID 28710469.
        33. Hardell, Lennart; Hansson Mild, Kjell; Sandström, Monica; Carlberg, Michael; Hallquist, Arne; Påhlson, Anneli (2003). “Vestibular Schwannoma, Tinnitus and Cellular Telephones”. Neuroepidemiology. 22 (2): 124–129. doi:10.1159/000068745. ISSN 0251-5350.
        34. Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
        35. Paulus, Werner (1999). “Classification, Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology of Primary CNS Lymphomas”. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 43 (3): 203–208. doi:10.1023/A:1006242116122. ISSN 0167-594X.
        36. Kucharczyk, W; Lemme-Pleghos, L; Uske, A; Brant-Zawadzki, M; Dooms, G; Norman, D (1985). “Intracranial vascular malformations: MR and CT imaging”. Radiology. 156 (2): 383–389. doi:10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011900. ISSN 0033-8419.
        37. Fleetwood, Ian G; Steinberg, Gary K (2002). “Arteriovenous malformations”. The Lancet. 359 (9309): 863–873. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1. ISSN 0140-6736.
        38. Chapman, Arlene B.; Rubinstein, David; Hughes, Richard; Stears, John C.; Earnest, Michael P.; Johnson, Ann M.; Gabow, Patricia A.; Kaehny, William D. (1992). “Intracranial Aneurysms in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (13): 916–920. doi:10.1056/NEJM199209243271303. ISSN 0028-4793.
        39. Castori M, Voermans NC (October 2014). “Neurological manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s): A review”. Iran J Neurol. 13 (4): 190–208. PMC 4300794. PMID 25632331.
        40. Schievink, W. I.; Raissi, S. S.; Maya, M. M.; Velebir, A. (2010). “Screening for intracranial aneurysms in patients with bicuspid aortic valve”. Neurology. 74 (18): 1430–1433. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1acf. ISSN 0028-3878.
        41. Germain DP (May 2017). “Pseudoxanthoma elasticum”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 12 (1): 85. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0639-8. PMC 5424392. PMID 28486967.
        42. Farahmand M, Farahangiz S, Yadollahi M (October 2013). “Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; A Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography”. Bull Emerg Trauma. 1 (4): 147–51. PMC 4789449. PMID 27162847.
        43. Haimes, AB; Zimmerman, RD; Morgello, S; Weingarten, K; Becker, RD; Jennis, R; Deck, MD (1989). “MR imaging of brain abscesses”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 152 (5): 1073–1085. doi:10.2214/ajr.152.5.1073. ISSN 0361-803X.
        44. Brouwer, Matthijs C.; Tunkel, Allan R.; McKhann, Guy M.; van de Beek, Diederik (2014). “Brain Abscess”. New England Journal of Medicine. 371 (5): 447–456. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1301635. ISSN 0028-4793.
        45. Morgado, Carlos; Ruivo, Nuno (2005). “Imaging meningo-encephalic tuberculosis”. European Journal of Radiology. 55 (2): 188–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.017. ISSN 0720-048X.
        46. Be NA, Kim KS, Bishai WR, Jain SK (March 2009). “Pathogenesis of central nervous system tuberculosis”. Curr. Mol. Med. 9 (2): 94–9. PMC 4486069. PMID 19275620.
        47. Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
        48. Helton KJ, Maron G, Mamcarz E, Leventaki V, Patay Z, Sadighi Z (November 2016). “Unusual magnetic resonance imaging presentation of post-BMT cerebral toxoplasmosis masquerading as meningoencephalitis and ventriculitis”. Bone Marrow Transplant. 51 (11): 1533–1536. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.168. PMID 27348541.
        49. Taslakian B, Darwish H (September 2016). “Intracranial hydatid cyst: imaging findings of a rare disease”. BMJ Case Rep. 2016. doi:10.1136/bcr-2016-216570. PMC 5030532. PMID 27620198.
        50. McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.
        51. McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.

        Template:WH Template:WS

        Epidemiology and Demographics

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        Intracerebral metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in adults, occurring in up to 30% of adult cancer patients.[1] They are estimated to account for approximately 25-50% of intracranial tumors in hospitalised patients.[2] The incidence of intracerebral metastases is estimated to be 200,000 cases annually in the United States.[3] The incidence of intracerebral metastases increases with age. The peak incidence occurs in patients over 65 years of age.[4] Intracerebral metastases affect men and women equally.[4]

        Epidemiology and Demographics

        Prevalence

        • Intracerebral metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in adults, occurring in up to 30% of adult cancer patients.[1]
        • Intracerebral metastases are estimated to account for approximately 25-50% of intracranial tumors in hospitalised patients.[2]
        • Upto 20–40% of patients with adult systemic malignancies will develop intracerebral metastases in the course of their disease; about 10–20% will be symptomatic.[5]

        Incidence

        • The incidence of intracerebral metastases is estimated to be 200,000 cases annually in the United States.[3]

        Age

        • The incidence of intracerebral metastases increases with age. The peak incidence occurs in patients over 65 years of age.[4]

        Gender

        • Intracerebral metastases affect men and women equally.[4]

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Khuntia, Deepak (2015). “Contemporary Review of the Management of Brain Metastasis with Radiation”. Advances in Neuroscience. 2015: 1–13. doi:10.1155/2015/372856. ISSN 2356-6787.
        2. 2.0 2.1 Introduction to brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 16, 2015
        3. 3.0 3.1 Epidemiology of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
        4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Incidence of metastatic brain tumors. American Brain Tumor Association 2015. http://www.abta.org/secure/metastatic-brain-tumor.pdf. Accessed on November 16, 2015
        5. Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Risk Factors

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        The risk of developing intracerebral metastases depends on the type and location of the primary tumor. Primary tumors that are commonly associated with the development of brain metastasis include lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal carcinoma.[1][2][3]

        Risk Factors

        • The risk of developing intracerebral metastases depends on the type and location of the primary tumor.
        • Primary tumors that are commonly associated with the development of brain metastasis include:[1][2][3]

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Causes of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
        2. 2.0 2.1 Epidemiology of brain metastasis. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
        3. 3.0 3.1 Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Toms, Steven A.; Weil, Robert J. (2012). “The Molecular Biology of Brain Metastasis”. Journal of Oncology. 2012: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2012/723541. ISSN 1687-8450.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Screening

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for intracerebral metastases.[1]

        Screening

        There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for intracerebral metastases.[1]

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Early detection, diagnosis, and staging of brain tumors. American cancer society. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/braincnstumorsinadults/detailedguide/brain-and-spinal-cord-tumors-in-adults-detection


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        If left untreated, patients with intracerebral metastases may progress to develop seizures, altered mental status, hemiplegia, focal neurological deficits, hemorrhage, brain herniation, coma, and death.[1][2] Common complications of intracerebral metastases include brain herniation, hemorrhage, coma, and stroke. Depending on the type of the primary cancer, the age of the patient, absence or presence of extracranial metastases, and the number of metastatic sites in the brain at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor. The median survival time of all patients with intracerebral metastases is 2.3 months.[3][4]

        Natural History

        If left untreated, patients with intracerebral metastases may progress to develop seizures, altered mental status, hemiplegia, focal neurological deficits, hemorrhage, brain herniation, coma, and death.[1][2]

        Complications

        Common complications of intracerebral metastases include:[2]

        Prognosis

        • Depending on the type of primary cancer; the age of the patient; absence or presence of extracranial metastases; and the number of metastatic sites in the brain at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor.[3][4]
        • The median survival time of all patients with intracerebral metastases is 2.3 months.
        • The primary tumor-specific median survival time of intracerebral metastases are tabulated below:[4]
        Primary Median survival (months) 95% C.I.
        Non-small cell lung cancer 7 6.53 – 7.50
        Small cell lung cancer 4.9 4.30 – 6.20
        Melanoma 6.74 5.90 – 7.57
        Renal cell carcinoma 9.63 7.66 – 10.91
        Breast cancer 11.93 9.69 – 12.85
        Gastrointestinal cancer 5.36 4.30 – 6.30
        Unknown 6.37 5.22 – 7.49
        • However, in some patients such as those with no extracranial metastases, the prognosis is much better with the median survival rate of upto 13.5 months.[3]
        • Favorable prognostic factors (median survival time of 13.5 months) for intracerebral metastases include:[3][5]
        • No extracranial metastases
        • Age less than 65 years
        • Single site of metastasis in the brain
        • Responsive to steroid treatment
        • No impairment of neurocognitive function
        • Supratentorial location
        • Female gender

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Clinical presentation of brain metastases. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Trent Orton et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/brain-metastases. Accessed on November 9, 2015
        2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Andrew B. Lassman & Lisa M. DeAngelis (2003). “Brain metastases”. Neurologic clinics. 21 (1): 1–23. PMID 12690643. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
        3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Prognosis of brain metastasis. Wikipedia 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_metastasis. Accessed on November 9, 2015
        4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Khuntia, Deepak (2015). “Contemporary Review of the Management of Brain Metastasis with Radiation”. Advances in Neuroscience. 2015: 1–13. doi:10.1155/2015/372856. ISSN 2356-6787.
        5. Fabi, Alessandra; Felici, Alessandra; Metro, Giulio; Mirri, Alessandra; Bria, Emilio; Telera, Stefano; Moscetti, Luca; Russillo, Michelangelo; Lanzetta, Gaetano; Mansueto, Giovanni; Pace, Andrea; Maschio, Marta; Vidiri, Antonello; Sperduti, Isabella; Cognetti, Francesco; Carapella, Carmine M (2011). “Brain metastases from solid tumors: disease outcome according to type of treatment and therapeutic resources of the treating center”. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 30 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-10. ISSN 1756-9966.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Diagnosis

        Diagnosis

        Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

        Treatment

        Treatment

        Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

        Case Studies

        Case Studies

        Case #1


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Looking for the patient version?

        Back to the patient-friendly article

        © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH