Chondroma
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2], Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]
Synonyms and keywords: Enchondroma, juxtacortical chondroma, enchondroma, periosteal chondroma, Ollier disease, enchondromatosis, metachondromatosis, benign chondroma
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2], Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]
Overview
Juxtacortical chondroma was first discovered by Lichtenstein and Hall in 1952. The term juxtacortical chondroma was first coined by Jaffe in 1956. Chondroma may be classified according to location of the outgrowth into 3 groups that include enchondrom, periosteal chondroma and synovial chondroma. Enchondromas arise from rests of growth plate cartilage or chondrocytes that are normally involved in the production and maintainence of the cartilaginous matrix, which consists mainly of collagen and proteoglycans. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of enchondromas and periostal chondromas include isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). On gross pathology, small (usually less than 3 cm), translucent, grey blue, nodular lesions with occasional calcifications are characteristic findings of chondromas. Enchondromas may be single or multiple. Multiple enchondromas are associated Maffucci syndrome, Ollier disease and metachondromatosis. The cause of chondromas has not been identified. However, enchondroma is believed to occur either as an overgrowth of the cartilage that lines the ends of the bones, or as a persistent growth of original embryonic cartilage.The incidence of osteochondromas is approximately 30,000 per 100,000 of all cartilage tumors and 2,000 per 100,000 of all bone tumors.The prevalence of enchondromas is approximately 12,000 – 24,000 per 100,000 individuals of benign bone tumors and 3000 – 10,000 of all bone tumors. Patients of all age groups may develop enchondromas. The incidence of enchondroma peaks in the third and fourth decades of life. Enchondroma affects men and women equally. Chondroma is usually diagnosed incidentally. Common complications of chondroma include malignant transformation into a low grade growth disturbance, pathologic fracture, especially in short tubular and recurrence. Benign chondromas have a good prognosis with aprropriate treatment. The majority of patients with enchondroma are asymptomatic. Less common symptoms of enchondroma may include pain, enlargement of the affected digits, and slowing of affected bone growth and asymmetrical bone deformities. There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with chondroma. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of chondroma include well-defined or sclerotic border, sharp zone of transition, confinement by natural barriers, lack of destruction of the cortex and lack of extension into the soft tissue. Findings on CT scan suggestive of enchondroma include sharply defined scalloped margins, expansion of the overlying cortex may be present, no periosteal reaction and soft tissue mass. Findings on MRI suggestive of chondroma include well circumscribed, lobulated mass replacing the marrow for enchondroma, lobulated soft tissue lesion that is abutting the cortex and evidence of pressure erosion on neighboring bone, with no evidence of medullary bone or soft tissue edema for periostal chondroma for periostal chondroma. Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with asymptomatic and benign chondroma. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either malignant transformation and pathological fracture.
Historical Perspective
Juxtacortical chondroma was first discovered by Lichtenstein and Hall in 1952. The term juxtacortical chondroma was first coined by Jaffe in 1956.
Classification
Chondroma may be classified according to location of the outgrowth into 3 groups that include enchondrom, periosteal chondroma and synovial chondroma.
Pathophysiology
Enchondromas arise from rests of growth plate cartilage or chondrocytes that are normally involved in the production and maintainence of the cartilaginous matrix, which consists mainly of collagen and proteoglycans. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of enchondromas and periostal chondromas include isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). On gross pathology, small (usually less than 3 cm), translucent, grey blue, nodular lesions with occasional calcifications are characteristic findings of chondromas. Enchondromas may be single or multiple. Multiple enchondromas are associated Maffucci syndrome, Ollier disease and metachondromatosis.
Causes
The cause of chondromas has not been identified. However, enchondroma is believed to occur either as an overgrowth of the cartilage that lines the ends of the bones, or as a persistent growth of original embryonic cartilage.
Epidemiology and Demographics
The incidence of osteochondromas is approximately 30,000 per 100,000 of all cartilage tumors and 2,000 per 100,000 of all bone tumors.The prevalence of enchondromas is approximately 12,000 – 24,000 per 100,000 individuals of benign bone tumors and 3000 -10,000 of all bone tumors. Patients of all age groups may develop enchondromas. The incidence of enchondroma peaks in the third and fourth decades of life. Enchondroma affects men and women equally.
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for chondromas.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for chondromas.
Differential Diagnosis
Enchondroma must be differentiated from low-grade chondrosarcoma, fibrocartilaginous dysplasia, bone islands and bone infarcts. Periosteal chondroma must be differentiated from periosteal chondrosarcoma and periosteal osteosarcoma.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Chondroma is usually diagnosed incidentally. Common complications of chondroma include malignant transformation into a low grade growth disturbance, pathologic fracture, especially in short tubular and recurrence. Benign chondromas have a good prognosis with aprropriate treatment.
History and Symptoms
The majority of patients with enchondroma are asymptomatic. Less common symptoms of enchondroma may include pain, enlargement of the affected digits, and slowing of affected bone growth and asymmetrical bone deformities.
Physical Examination
Patients with chondroma usually appear well. Physical examination of patients with enchondroma is usually unremarkable.
Laboratory Findings
There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with chondroma.
Electrocardiogram
There are no electrocardiogram findings associated with chondroma.
X Ray Findings
Findings on an x-ray suggestive of chondroma include well-defined or sclerotic border, sharp zone of transition, confinement by natural barriers, lack of destruction of the cortex and lack of extension into the soft tissue.
CT
Findings on CT scan suggestive of enchondroma include sharply defined scalloped margins, expansion of the overlying cortex may be present, no periosteal reaction and soft tissue mass.
MRI
Findings on MRI suggestive of chondroma include well circumscribed, lobulated mass replacing the marrow for enchondroma, lobulated soft tissue lesion that is abutting the cortex and evidence of pressure erosion on neighboring bone, with no evidence of medullary bone or soft tissue edema for periostal chondroma for periostal chondroma.
Echocardiography or Ultrasound
There are no echocardiography or ultrasound findings associated with chondroma.
Other imaging studies
Other imaging studies for enchondroma includes radionuclide bone scan.
Medical Therapy
There is no medical therapy for chondromas; the mainstay of therapy is surgery.
Surgery
Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with asymptomatic and benign chondroma. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either malignant transformation and pathological fracture.
Primary Prevention
There is no established method for primary prevention of chondroma.
Secondary Prevention
There is no established method for secondary prevention of chondroma.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Farima Kahe M.D. [2], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [3]
Overview
Juxtacortical chondroma was first discovered by Lichtenstein and Hall in 1952. The term juxtacortical chondroma was first coined by Jaffe in 1956.
Historical Perspective
- Juxtacortical chondroma was first discovered by Lichtenstein and Hall in 1952. It was initially termed periosteal chondroma.
- The term juxtacortical chondroma was first coined by Jaffe in 1956.[1]
References
- ↑ Meyer, R. (1958). “Juxtacortical Chondroma”. The British Journal of Radiology. 31 (362): 106–107. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-31-362-106. ISSN 0007-1285.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2], Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]
Overview
Chondroma may be classified according to location of the outgrowth into 3 groups that include enchondroma, periosteal chondroma and synovial chondroma.
Classification
- Chondroma may be classified according to location of the outgrowth into 3 groups:[1][2][3]
- Enchondroma
- Periosteal chondroma
- Synovial chondroma
- Another classification for chondroma which is used less commonly is based on their anatomic locations:[4][5][6]
- Chondroma of tip of the nose
- Extraskeletal chondroma of the scalp
- Intracranial chondroma
- Sacrococcygeal chondroma
- Skull base chondroma
- Spinal chondroma
References
- ↑ Bachoura A, Rice IS, Lubahn AR, Lubahn JD (September 2015). “The surgical management of hand enchondroma without postcurettage void augmentation: authors’ experience and a systematic review”. Hand (N Y). 10 (3): 461–71. doi:10.1007/s11552-015-9738-y. PMC 4551638. PMID 26330779.
- ↑ Uhl M, Herget G, Kurz P (June 2016). “[Cartilage tumors : Pathology and radiomorphology]”. Radiologe (in German). 56 (6): 476–88. doi:10.1007/s00117-016-0112-z. PMID 27233920.
- ↑ Chun KA, Stephanie S, Choi JY, Nam JH, Suh JS (2015). “Enchondroma of the Foot”. J Foot Ankle Surg. 54 (5): 836–9. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2015.01.002. PMID 26024560.
- ↑ Gaetani P, Tancioni F, Merlo P, Villani L, Spanu G, Baena RR (December 1996). “Spinal chondroma of the lumbar tract: case report”. Surg Neurol. 46 (6): 534–9. PMID 8956884.
- ↑ Sreedharan S, Kamath MP, Hegde MC, Sundar S, Lobo FD, Raju PK (January 2006). “Chondroma of the nasal bone: a case report”. Ear Nose Throat J. 85 (1): 44–6. PMID 16509243.
- ↑ Brownlee RD, Sevick RJ, Rewcastle NB, Tranmer BI (May 1997). “Intracranial chondroma”. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 18 (5): 889–93. PMID 9159366.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2] Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]
Overview
Enchondromas arise from rests of growth plate cartilage or chondrocytes that are normally involved in the production and maintenance of the cartilaginous matrix, which consists mainly of collagen and proteoglycans. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of enchondromas and periosteal chondromas include isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) . On gross pathology, small (usually less than 3 cm), translucent, grey blue, nodular lesions with occasional calcifications are characteristic findings of chondromas. Enchondromas may be single or multiple. Multiple enchondromas are associated Maffucci syndrome, Ollier disease and metachondromatosis.
Pathogenesis
- Enchondromas arise from rests of growth plate cartilage or chondrocytes that are normally involved in the production and maintenance of the cartilaginous matrix, which consists mainly of collagen and proteoglycans.[1]
- Chondromas arise as the result of nests of growth plate cartilage that have become entrapped in the medullary canal of the metaphysis or in the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction. These hamartomatous proliferations persist as islands in the bone and then develop from enchondral ossification.[2][3]
Genetics
- Genes involved in the pathogenesis of enchondromas and periosteal chondromas include isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) .[4]
Associated conditions
Enchondromas may be single or multiple. Multiple enchondromas are associated with the following:[5][6][7]
| Associated disease | Findings | Occurance |
|---|---|---|
|
Sporadic | |
|
Sporadic | |
|
Gross Pathology
- On gross pathology, small (usually less than 3 cm), translucent, grey blue, nodular lesions with occasional calcifications are characteristic findings of chondromas.[8][9]
Microscopic Pathology
- On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of chondroma are as followings:[10][11]
- Cytologically benign cells in spaced nests
- Not extending into surrounding soft tissue
- Avascular, fibrous lobules of hyaline cartilagenous matrix
- Interspersed with chondrocytes and separated by normal marrow
{{#ev:youtube|FLqr7Ld5-qc}}
References
- ↑ Dal Cin P, Qi H, Sciot R, Van den Berghe H (February 1997). “Involvement of chromosomes 6 and 11 in a soft tissue chondroma”. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 93 (2): 177–8. PMID 9078305.
- ↑ Geng S, Zhang J, Zhang LW, Wu Z, Jia G, Xiao X, Hao S (July 2014). “Diagnosis and microsurgical treatment of chondromas and chondrosarcomas of the cranial base”. Oncol Lett. 8 (1): 301–304. doi:10.3892/ol.2014.2072. PMC 4063631. PMID 24959265.
- ↑ Lewis MM, Kenan S, Yabut SM, Norman A, Steiner G (July 1990). “Periosteal chondroma. A report of ten cases and review of the literature”. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (256): 185–92. PMID 2194723.
- ↑ Sandberg AA (July 2004). “Genetics of chondrosarcoma and related tumors”. Curr Opin Oncol. 16 (4): 342–54. PMID 15187889.
- ↑ Prokopchuk O, Andres S, Becker K, Holzapfel K, Hartmann D, Friess H (February 2016). “Maffucci syndrome and neoplasms: a case report and review of the literature”. BMC Res Notes. 9: 126. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1913-x. PMC 4769492. PMID 26920730.
- ↑ Mavrogenis AF, Skarpidi E, Papakonstantinou O, Papagelopoulos PJ (June 2010). “Chondrosarcoma in metachondromatosis: a case report”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92 (6): 1507–13. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00693. PMID 20516327.
- ↑ Watanabe F, Saiki T, Ochochi Y (2012). “Extraskeletal chondroma of the preauricular region: a case report and literature review”. Case Rep Med. 2012: 121743. doi:10.1155/2012/121743. PMC 3400396. PMID 22844293.
- ↑ Semenova LA, Bulycheva IV (2007). “[Chondromas (enchondroma, periosteal chondroma, enchondromatosis)]”. Arkh. Patol. (in Russian). 69 (5): 45–8. PMID 18074822.
- ↑ Chung EB, Enzinger FM (April 1978). “Chondroma of soft parts”. Cancer. 41 (4): 1414–24. PMID 76505.
- ↑ Uhl M, Herget G, Kurz P (June 2016). “[Cartilage tumors : Pathology and radiomorphology]”. Radiologe (in German). 56 (6): 476–88. doi:10.1007/s00117-016-0112-z. PMID 27233920.
- ↑ Blum MR, Danford M, Speight PM (August 1993). “Soft tissue chondroma of the cheek”. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 22 (7): 334–6. PMID 8229872.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Farima Kahe M.D. [2], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [3]
Overview
The cause of chondromas has not been identified.
Causes
- The cause of chondromas has not been identified. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR3) deletion may be induced multiple chondroma-like lesions, including enchondromas and osteochondromas.[1]
- However, enchondroma is believed to occur either as:
References
- ↑ Zhou S, Xie Y, Tang J, Huang J, Huang Q, Xu W, Wang Z, Luo F, Wang Q, Chen H, Du X, Shen Y, Chen D, Chen L (June 2015). “FGFR3 Deficiency Causes Multiple Chondroma-like Lesions by Upregulating Hedgehog Signaling”. PLoS Genet. 11 (6): e1005214. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005214. PMC 4474636. PMID 26091072.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2], Farima Kahe M.D. [3], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [4]
Overview
The incidence of otesochondromas is approximately 30,000 per 100,000 of all cartilage tumors and 2,000 per 100,000 of all bone tumors.The prevalence of enchondromas is approximately 12,000 – 24,000 per 100,000 individuals of benign bone tumors and 3000-10,000 of all bone tumors. Patients of all age groups may develop enchondromas. The incidence of enchondroma peaks in the third and fourth decades of life. Enchondroma affects men and women equally.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence
- The incidence of otesochondromas is approximately 30,000 per 100,000 of all cartilage tumors and 2,000 per 100,000 of all bone tumors.[1]
Prevalence
- The prevalence of benign cartilage tumors is approximately 27000 per 100,000 individuals of all bone tumors and 70,000 per 100,000 of all cartilage tumors.[2][3]
- The prevalence of enchondromas is approximately 12,000 – 24,000 per 100,000 individuals of benign bone tumors and 3000-10,000 of all bone tumors.[4]
- The prevalence of periosteal chondromas is approximately 1000 per 100,000 individuals of all chondromas and 100 per 100,000 of all bone tumors.
Age
- Patients of all age groups may develop enchondromas.
- The incidence of enchondroma peaks in the third and fourth decades of life.[5]
- Periosteal chondromas are frequently diagnosed in the second or third decades of life.
- Patients of all age groups may develop synovial chondromas, and fifth decade is a peak incidence.[6]
Race
- There is no racial predilection to chondroma.
Gender
- Enchondroma affects men and women equally.
- Males are more commonly affected by periosteal chondromas than females.[7]
- Male are more commonly affected by osteochondromas than female. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.8 to 1.[7]
- Male are more commonly affected by synovial chondroma than female.The male to female ratio is approximately 2 to 1.[8]
References
- ↑ Verdegaal SH, Bovée JV, Pansuriya TC, Grimer RJ, Ozger H, Jutte PC, San Julian M, Biau DJ, van der Geest IC, Leithner A, Streitbürger A, Klenke FM, Gouin FG, Campanacci DA, Marec-Berard P, Hogendoorn PC, Brand R, Taminiau AH (2011). “Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of chondrosarcoma in patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome: an international multicenter study of 161 patients”. Oncologist. 16 (12): 1771–9. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0200. PMC 3248776. PMID 22147000.
- ↑ Stomp W, Reijnierse M, Kloppenburg M, de Mutsert R, Bovée JV, den Heijer M, Bloem JL (December 2015). “Prevalence of cartilaginous tumours as an incidental finding on MRI of the knee”. Eur Radiol. 25 (12): 3480–7. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3764-6. PMC 4636526. PMID 25994192.
- ↑ Woertler K, Blasius S, Brinkschmidt C, Hillmann A, Link TM, Heindel W (2001). “Periosteal chondroma: MR characteristics”. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 25 (3): 425–30. PMID 11351194.
- ↑ McCarthy C, Anderson WJ, Vlychou M, Inagaki Y, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Athanasou NA (June 2016). “Primary synovial chondromatosis: a reassessment of malignant potential in 155 cases”. Skeletal Radiol. 45 (6): 755–62. doi:10.1007/s00256-016-2353-3. PMID 26919862.
- ↑ Matysiakiewicz J, Tomasik P, Miszczyk L, Spindel J, Widuchowski J, Koczy B, Chrobok A, Mrozek T (2010). “Manifestations, diagnosis and surgical treatment of enchondroma–own experience”. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 12 (2): 155–9. PMID 20453254.
- ↑ Flemming DJ, Murphey MD (2000). “Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma”. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 4 (1): 59–71. PMID 11061692.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Chun KA, Stephanie S, Choi JY, Nam JH, Suh JS (2015). “Enchondroma of the Foot”. J Foot Ankle Surg. 54 (5): 836–9. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2015.01.002. PMID 26024560.
- ↑ Goedhart LM, Ploegmakers JJ, Kroon HM, Zwartkruis EC, Jutte PC (June 2014). “The presentation, treatment and outcome of periosteal chondrosarcoma in the Netherlands”. Bone Joint J. 96-B (6): 823–8. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.33037. PMID 24891585.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Farima Kahe M.D. [2], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [3]
Overview
There are no established risk factors for chondroma.
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for chondroma.
References
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for chondromas.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for chondromas.
References
Differentiating Chondroma from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rohan A. Bhimani, M.B.B.S., D.N.B., M.Ch.[2]
Overview
Enchondroma must be differentiated from low-grade chondrosarcoma, fibrocartilaginous dysplasia, bone islands and bone infarcts. Periosteal chondroma must be differentiated from juxtacortical chondrosarcoma, osteochondroma and periosteal osteosarcoma.
Differential Diagnosis
Enchondroma
Enchondroma must be differentiated from the following:[1][2]
Low-grade Chondrosarcoma
- When differentiating an enchondroma from a chondrosarcoma, the radiographic image may be equivocal. However, periostitis is not usually seen with an uncomplicated enchondroma.
Chondroblastoma
- Presence of bone marrow edema frequently seen surrounding chondroblastomas is helpful, as it is not a usual feature of chondromyxoid fibromas, giant cell tumors, or enchondromas.[1]
Fibrocartilaginous dysplasia
- Fibrous dysplasia is seen with an extensive cartilagenous differentiation that results in a picture that mimics enchondroma.
- Cellular atypia in the surrounding stroma helps in the differentiation.[2]
Bone Islands
- Small focus of compact bone within the cancellous bone.
- No cortical destruction or involvement of the surrounding soft tissues.
Bone Infarcts
- Differentiating an enchondroma from a bone infarct on plain film may be difficult.
- An enchondroma usually causes endosteal scalloping while an infarct will not.
- An infarct usually has a well-defined, sclerotic serpentine border, whereas an endochondroma does not have a well defined border.
Periosteal Chondroma
Periosteal chondroma must be differentiated from the following:[3][4][5][6]
Periosteal chondrosarcoma
- Chondrosarcomas are generally greater in size and occur in older patients more than 50 years of age.
- They may extend into the soft tissue.
- Periosteal chondrosarcoma shows popcorn calcifications on radiographs, which present as a collection of scalloped radiolucencies and with a sclerotic margin.
Periosteal osteosarcoma
- Periosteal osteosarcomas are slow-growing, and primarily arise beneath the periosteum, inducing new bone formation.
- It seen as a radiolucent lesion on the bone surface with perpendicular striae and a peripheral Codman’s triangle on radiography.
Osteochondroma
- Osteochondromas are more commonly seen in adolescents, in contrast with periosteal chondromas, which typically occur in young adults.
- Osteochondromas may also be distinguished by the presence of a dense osteoid formation in the cortex and medulla of the mass, and by the continuation with its originating bone.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Erickson JK, Rosenthal DI, Zaleske DJ, Gebhardt MC, Cates JM (2001). “Primary treatment of chondroblastoma with percutaneous radio-frequency heat ablation: report of three cases”. Radiology. 221 (2): 463–8. doi:10.1148/radiol.2212010262. PMID 11687691.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Muezzinoglu B, Oztop F (2001). “Fibrocartilaginous dysplasia: a variant of fibrous dysplasia”. Malays J Pathol. 23 (1): 35–9. PMID 16329546.
- ↑ Singh AP, Singh AP, Mahajan S (2008). “Periosteal chondroma of the sacrum”. Can J Surg. 51 (5): E105–6. PMC 2556540. PMID 18841229.
- ↑ Agrawal A, Dwivedi SP, Joshi R, Gangane N (2005). “Osteochondroma of the sacrum with a correlative radiographic and histological evaluation”. Pediatr Neurosurg. 41 (1): 46–8. doi:10.1159/000084865. PMID 15886513.
- ↑ Akansu B, Atık E, Altintaş S, Kalaci A, Canda S (2012). “Periosteal chondroma of the ischium; an unusual location”. Turk Patoloji Derg. 28 (2): 172–4. doi:10.5146/tjpath.2012.01119. PMID 22627638.
- ↑ Sulzbacher I, Puig S, Trieb K, Lang S (2000). “Periosteal osteoblastoma: a case report and a review of the literature”. Pathol Int. 50 (8): 667–71. PMID 10972867.
Natural History, Complications & Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Farima Kahe M.D. [2], Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [3]
Overview
Chondroma is usually diagnosed incidentally. Common complications of chondroma include malignant transformation into a low grade growth disturbance, pathologic fracture, especially in short tubular bones and recurrence. Benign chondromas have a good prognosis with appropriate treatment.
Natural History
- Chondroma is usually diagnosed incidentally.[1]
- Chondroma grows slowly, with a mean time of 41 months between initial diagnosis and change in lesion.
Complications
- Common complications of chondroma include:[2][3][4][5]
- Malignant transformation into a low grade chondrosarcoma
- Growth disturbance
- Pathologic fracture, especially in short tubular bones
- Recurrence
Prognosis
- Benign chondromas have a good prognosis with aprropriate treatment.[6]
- Most patients with chondroma under treatment remain asymptomatic and the disease may rarely recur.[7]
References
- ↑ Deckers C, Schreuder BH, Hannink G, de Rooy JW, van der Geest IC (December 2016). “Radiologic follow-up of untreated enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumors in the long bones”. J Surg Oncol. 114 (8): 987–991. doi:10.1002/jso.24465. PMID 27696436.
- ↑ Palaoglu S, Akkas O, Sav A (1988). “Chondroma of the cervical spine”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 90 (3): 253–5. PMID 3197353.
- ↑ Müller PE, Dürr HR, Nerlich A, Pellengahr C, Maier M, Jansson V (June 2004). “Malignant transformation of a benign enchondroma of the hand to secondary chondrosarcoma with isolated pulmonary metastasis”. Acta Chir. Belg. 104 (3): 341–4. PMID 15285552.
- ↑ Martin JA, Forest E, Block JA, Klingelhutz AJ, Whited B, Gitelis S, Wilkey A, Buckwalter JA (September 2002). “Malignant transformation in human chondrosarcoma cells supported by telomerase activation and tumor suppressor inactivation”. Cell Growth Differ. 13 (9): 397–407. PMID 12354749.
- ↑ Choi E, Wert M, Guerrieri C, Tucci J (November 2010). “A pathologic fracture of an intracortical chondroma masking as an osteoid osteoma”. Orthopedics. 33 (11): 845. doi:10.3928/01477447-20100924-24. PMID 21053879.
- ↑ Freilich H (June 1991). “Breast cancer screening”. Med. J. Aust. 154 (11): 781–2. PMID 1888368.
- ↑ Rozeman LB, Hogendoorn PC, Bovée JV (September 2002). “Diagnosis and prognosis of chondrosarcoma of bone”. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2 (5): 461–72. doi:10.1586/14737159.2.5.461. PMID 12271817.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice | Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Disgnostic Studies
Resources
Resources
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
