Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Glioblastoma multiforme


For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Spongioblastoma multiforme; glioblastoma; glioblastomas; GBM; GBMs; G.B.M; grade IV astrocytoma; grade IV astrocytomas; astrocytoma, grade IV; undifferentiated glioma; grade IV malignant astrocytoma; grade IV malignant glioma; kernohan grade IV astrocytoma; St. Anne/Mayo astrocytoma grade 4; butterfly glioma

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Glioblastoma multiforme, also known as glioblastoma, is the most common adult primary intracranial neoplasm worldwide. Glioblastoma multiforme may be classified into several subtypes based on the origin and molecular alterations. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include a poorly-marginated, diffusely infiltrating, firm or gelatinous mass with a central necrotic core. On microscopic histopathological analysis, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include pleomorphic astrocytes with marked atypia, mitosis, necrosis, and microvascular proliferation. The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme is estimated to be 3.2 cases per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Glioblastoma multiforme is a common disease that tends to affect older adults and the elderly population. The median age at diagnosis is 64 years. Males are more commonly affected with glioblastoma multiforme than females. Common risk factors in the development of glioblastoma multiforme are radiation exposure, viruses, polyvinyl chloride, alcohol, and genetic disorders. Common complications of glioblastoma multiforme include herniation, systemic illness, brainstem invasion by tumor, neutron-induced cerebral injury, weakness, fatigue, numbness, surgical complications, and coma. Prognosis is generally poor, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is less than 10%. Symptoms of glioblastoma multiforme include headache, seizure, memory loss, irritability, changes in speech, difficulty reading or concentrating, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, muscle weakness, sensory loss, diplopia, blurred vision, vertigo, hearing loss, and hiccups. Common physical examination findings of glioblastoma multiforme include personality changes, memory loss, aphasia, hemiparesis, sensory loss, and ataxia. Head CT scan and brain MRI are helpful in the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme. On head CT scan, glioblastoma multiforme is characterized by a butterfly shaped mass with marked midline shift, irregular and heterogenous enhancement of margins, necrotic center, surrounding vasogenic edema, and hemorrhage. On brain MRI, glioblastoma multiforme is characterized by hypointense mass on T1-weighted MRI and hyperintense mass on T2-weighted MRI. The predominant therapy for glioblastoma multiforme is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and radiation may be required. Supportive therapy for glioblastoma multiforme includes anticonvulsants and corticosteroids.

Historical Perspective

The term glioblastoma multiforme was first coined by Percival Bailey and Harvey Cushing in 1926.

Classification

Glioblastoma multiforme may be classified into several subtypes based on the origin (primary and secondary) and molecular alterations (classic, proneural, mesenchymal, and neural).

Pathophysiology

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma multiforme include Mdm2, PTEN, IDH1, p53, EGFR, PDGFRA, and chromosomes 10p, 10q, 17p, and 19q. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include a poorly-marginated, diffusely infiltrating, firm or gelatinous mass with a central necrotic core. On microscopic histopathological analysis, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include pleomorphic astrocytes with marked atypia, mitosis, necrosis, and microvascular proliferation.

Causes

There are no established causes for glioblastoma multiforme.

Differentiating brain tumors from other diseases

Glioblastoma multiforme must be differentiated from cerebral metastasis, primary CNS lymphoma, cerebral abscess, anaplastic astrocytoma, tumefactive demyelination, stroke, cerebral toxoplasmosis, radiation necrosis, encephalitis, oligodendroglioma, and seizure disorder.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Glioblastoma multiforme is the the most common adult primary intracranial neoplasm worldwide. The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme is estimated to be 3.2 cases per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Glioblastoma multiforme is a common disease that tends to affect older adult and elderly population. The median age at diagnosis is 64 years. Males are more commonly affected with glioblastoma multiforme than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.5 to 1. Glioblastoma multiforme usually affects individuals of the Caucasian race.

Risk factors

Common risk factors in the development of glioblastoma multiforme are radiation exposure, viruses, polyvinyl chloride, alcohol, and genetic disorders.

Screening

Screening for glioblastoma multiforme is not recommended.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, glioblastoma multiforme may extend into the meninges, ventricular wall, or spinal cord. Common complications of glioblastoma multiforme include herniation, hydrocephalus, systemic illness, brainstem invasion by tumor, neutron-induced cerebral injury, weakness, fatigue, numbness, surgical complications, and coma. Prognosis is generally poor, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is less than 10%.

Staging

There is no established system for the staging of glioblastoma multiforme.

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of glioblastoma multiforme include headache, seizure, memory loss, irritability, changes in speech, difficulty reading or concentrating, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, muscle weakness, sensory loss, diplopia, blurred vision, vertigo, hearing loss, and hiccups.

Physical examination

Common physical examination findings of glioblastoma multiforme include personality changes, memory loss, aphasia, hemiparesis, sensory loss, and ataxia.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with glioblastoma multiforme.

X Ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with glioblastoma multiforme.

CT

Head CT scan is helpful in the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme. On head CT scan, glioblastoma multiforme is characterized by a butterfly shaped mass with marked midline shift, irregular and heterogenous enhancement of margins, necrotic center, surrounding vasogenic edema, and hemorrhage.

MRI

Brain MRI is helpful in the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme. On brain MRI, glioblastoma multiforme is characterized by a butterfly shaped mass, which is hypointense on T1-weighted MRI and hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI.

Ultrasound

There are no ultrasound findings associated with glioblastoma multiforme.

Other Imaging Findings

Other imaging tests for glioblastoma multiforme include PET scan, which demonstrates accumulation of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (increased glucose metabolism).

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for glioblastoma multiforme include biopsy, which demonstrates pleomorphic astroctyes with marked atypia and mitoses.

Medical Therapy

The predominant therapy for glioblastoma multiforme is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and radiation may be required. Supportive therapy for glioblastoma multiforme includes anticonvulsants and corticosteroids.

Surgery

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for glioblastoma multiforme.

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for primary prevention of glioblastoma multiforme.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for secondary prevention of glioblastoma multiforme.


References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

The term “glioma” was first introduced by Rudolf Virchow in 1864. The suffix multiforme was meant to describe the various appearances of hemorrhage, necrosis, and cysts. the first successful removal of a brain tumor is credited to the Scottish neurosurgeon Sir William Macewen in 1879. The first successful removal of a brain tumor is credited to the Scottish neurosurgeon Sir William Macewen in 1879. In 1926 Percival Bailey and Harvey Cushing published “A Classification of the Tumors of the Glioma Group on a Histogenetic Basis with a Correlated Study of Prognosis” and the term “glioblastoma multiforme” (GBM) was coined. The WHO classification dropped the term multiforme and thus it is best referred as glioblastoma or grade IV astrocytoma.

Historical Perspective

  • The term “glioma” was first introduced by Rudolf Virchow in 1864.
  • The suffix multiforme was meant to describe the various appearances of hemorrhage, necrosis, and cysts.
  • the first successful removal of a brain tumor is credited to the Scottish neurosurgeon Sir William Macewen in 1879.
  • In 1922 Bailey and Cushing created a histological laboratory to examine Cushing’s collection of brain tumours found within his registry.
  • In 1926 Percival Bailey and Harvey Cushing published “A Classification of the Tumors of the Glioma Group on a Histogenetic Basis with a Correlated Study of Prognosis” and the term “glioblastoma multiforme” (GBM) was coined.
  • In 1940 neuropathologist Hans-Joachim Scherer made distinction between primary and secondary GBMs.
  • Initially known as “spongioblastoma multiforme”, Bailey and Cushing adopted the term glioblastoma to limit confusion.
  • In 1976 the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) was created by the WHO for recording the incidence of malignancy and survival.
  • In 1993, GBM was removed from its original category and placed in the spectrum of “Astrocytic Tumours” and is classed as WHO grade IV astrocytoma.
  • The WHO classification dropped the term multiforme and thus it is best referred as glioblastoma or grade IV astrocytoma.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Glioblastoma multiforme may be classified into several subtypes based on the origin (primary and secondary) and molecular alterations (classic, proneural, mesenchymal, and neural).The heterogeneity of GBM profiles leads to different treatment efficacy among patients. The therapy must be personalized to target each patient’s alterations in the molecular level. [1]

Classification

Based on the origin

Glioblastoma multiforme may be classified according to the origin into two subtypes: Primary and secondary.

Subtype of Glioblastoma multiforme Characteristic features
Primary glioblastoma multiforme
  • De novo origin
  • More aggressive
  • Occurs in older patients
Secondary glioblastoma multiforme
  • Arises from pre-existing lower grade gliomas
  • Less aggressive
  • Occurs in younger patients
  • Primary GBM is the most common form (about 95%) and arises typically de novo, within 3–6 months, in older patients.
  • Secondary GBM arises from prior low-grade astrocytomas (over 10–15 years) in younger patients.
  • Primary and secondary forms show some molecular differences.
  • The end result of both sub type is same since the same pathways are affected and respond similarly to current standard treatment.
  • Primary GBM often has amplified and mutated epidermal-growth factor receptor (EGFR) which encodes altered EGF receptor.
  • Secondary GBM has increased signaling through PDGF-A receptor.
  • Both types of mutations lead to increased tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR) activity and consequently to activation of RAS and PI3K pathways.
  • Primary and secondary GBM may be indistinguishable histologically but apparently differ in genetic and epigenetic profiles.

Based on the molecular alterations

  • the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) divided GBM according to the molecular alterations into four subtypes:[1]
  1. Classic
  2. Proneural
  3. Mesenchymal
  4. Neural
  • Classical GBM is defined by aberrant EGFR amplification with astrocytic cell expression pattern and loss of chromosome 10.
  • The mesenchymal subtype is defined by NF1 and PTEN mutations, a mesenchymal expression profile and less EGFR amplification than in other GBM types.
  • The proneural subtype is characterized by PDGFRA focal amplification, TP53 and IDH1 mutations with an oligodenrocytic cell expression profile and younger presentation age.
  • The neural subtype is characterized by normal brain tissue gene expression wuth astrocytic and oligodendrocytic cell markers.
  • Most GBM tumors with IDH1 mutations have the proneural gene expression pattern but only 30% of preneural GBM has the IDH1 mutation.
  • IDH1 mutation is a reliable and definitive molecular diagnostic criterion of secondary GBM compared to clinical criteria.
  • The heterogeneity of GBM profiles leads to different treatment efficacy among patients.
  • The therapy must be personalized to target each patient’s alterations in the molecular level.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD; et al. (2010). “Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of Glioblastoma multiforme characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1”. Cancer Cell. 17 (1): 98–110. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020. PMC 2818769. PMID 20129251.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma multiforme include Mdm2, PTEN, IDH1, p53, EGFR, PDGFRA, and chromosomes 10p, 10q, 17p, and 19q. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include a poorly-marginated, diffusely infiltrating, firm or gelatinous mass with a central necrotic core. On microscopic histopathological analysis, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include pleomorphic astrocytes with marked atypia, mitosis, necrosis, and microvascular proliferation. Another important alteration is methylation of MGMT, a suicide DNA repair enzyme. Methylation is described to impair DNA transcription and therefore, expression of the MGMT enzyme. MGMT methylation is associated with an improved response to treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics, such as temozolomide. Glioblastoma multiforme exhibits numerous alterations in genes that encode for ion channels, including upregulation of gBK potassium channels and ClC-3 chloride channels. Upregulating these ion channels, the tumor cells can facilitate increased ion movement over the cell membrane, thereby increasing H2O movement through osmosis, which aids the tumor cells in changing cellular volume very rapidly.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

Molecular alterations

  • There are four subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme.[1]
  • Tumors in the “classical” subtype is characterized by mutations in EGFR.
  • The “proneural” subtype often has high rates of alterations in TP53, PDGFRA, and IDH1.
  • The “mesenchymal” subtype is characterized by mutations in NF1, and EGFR.
  • The “neural” subtype has several mutations in many of the same genes as the other groups.
  • Majority of the genetic alterations in glioblastoma multiforme are clustered in three pathways: p53, Rb, and PI3K/AKT.
  • Another important alteration is methylation of MGMT, a suicide DNA repair enzyme. Methylation is described to impair DNA transcription and therefore, expression of the MGMT enzyme. Since MGMT can only repair one DNA alkylation due its suicide repair mechanism, reverse capacity is low and methylation of the MGMT gene promoter greatly affects DNA repair capacity. Hence, MGMT methylation is associated with an improved response to treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics, such as temozolomide.

Glioblastoma multiforme stem-like cells

  • Cancer cells with stem cell-like properties have been found to be a cause of resistance to conventional treatment and high recurrence rate of glioblastoma multiforme.
  • A biomarker that exhibits cancer stem cell properties, Hes3, has been shown to regulate cells of glioblastoma multiforme when placed in culture.

Metabolism

  • The IDH1 gene is frequently mutated in glioblastoma multiforme (primary: 5%, secondary: 80%). By producing very high concentrations of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate and dysregulating the function of the wild-type IDH1-enzyme, it induces profound changes to the metabolism of IDH1-mutated glioblastoma multiforme compared with IDH1 wild-type glioblastoma multiforme or healthy astrocytes.
  • The IDH1 mutation increases the dependence of glioblastoma multiforme on glutamine or glutamate as an energy source. Since healthy astrocytes excrete glutamate, IDH1-mutated glioblastoma multiforme cells do not favor dense tumor structures but instead migrate, invade and disperse into healthy parts of the brain where glutamate concentrations are higher. This may explain the invasive behavior of these IDH1-mutated glioblastoma multiforme.

Ion channels

Genetics

  • Development of glioblastoma multiforme is the result from multiple genetic mutations.
  • Genes involved in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma multiforme include the following:[2]
Types of glioblastoma multiforme Genes
Primary​
Secondary
  • IDH1
  • p53
  • Gene on chromosome 10q
  • Gene on chromosome 17p
  • Gene on chromosome 19q
Classic
Proneural
Mesenchymal

Associated Conditions

Glioblastoma multiforme may be associated with:[2]

Pathology

Gross Pathology

|

Gross pathology of glioblastoma multiforme.Source:Wikimedia Commons


On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiforme include:[2][3]

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic histopathological analysis, the characteristic findings of glioblastoma multiformes include:[2][3]

|

Microscopic image of Glioblastoma multiforme.Source:Wikimedia Commons

According to WHO classification of brain tumors, glioblastoma multiforme is termed as grade IV tumor.[2]

Immunohistochemistry

Glioblastoma multiforme is demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers such as GFAP.[2]

References

  1. Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD; et al. (2010). “Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1”. Cancer Cell. 17 (1): 98–110. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020. PMC 2818769. PMID 20129251.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Pathology of Glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/Glioblastoma
  3. 3.0 3.1 Pathology of Glioblastoma multiforme. Libre Pathology. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Glioblastoma


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Common causes of glioblastoma multiforme include genetic mutations.[1]

Type of glioblastoma multiforme Genes
Primary​
Secondary
  • IDH1
  • p53
  • Gene on chromosome 10q
  • Gene on chromosome 17p
  • Gene on chromosome 19q
Classic
Proneural
Mesenchymal

Causes

Common causes of glioblastoma multiforme include genetic mutations.[1]

Type of glioblastoma multiforme Genes
Primary​
Secondary
  • IDH1
  • p53
  • Gene on chromosome 10q
  • Gene on chromosome 17p
  • Gene on chromosome 19q
Classic
Proneural
Mesenchymal

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Etiology of glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/glioblastoma


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Glioblastoma multiforme from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Glioblastoma multiforme must be differentiated from cerebral metastasis, primary CNS lymphoma, cerebral abscess, anaplastic astrocytoma, tumefactive demyelination, stroke, cerebral toxoplasmosis, radiation necrosis, encephalitis, oligodendroglioma, and seizure disorder.[1]

Differentiating Glioblastoma multiforme from other Diseases

Glioblastoma multiforme must be differentiated from the following:[1]

Diseases Clinical manifestations Para-clinical findings Gold
standard
Additional findings
Symptoms Physical examination
Lab Findings MRI Immunohistopathology
Head-
ache
Seizure Visual disturbance Constitutional Focal neurological deficit
Adult primary brain tumors
Glioblastoma multiforme
[2][3][4]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Pseudopalisading appearance
Oligodendroglioma
[5][6][7]
+ + +/− +
  • Chicken wire capillary pattern
  • Fried egg cell appearance
Meningioma
[8][9][10]
+ +/− +/− +
  • Well circumscribed
  • Extra-axial mass
  • Whorled spindle cell pattern
  • May be associated with NF-2
Hemangioblastoma
[11][12][13][14]
+ +/− +/− +
Pituitary adenoma
[15][16][4]
+ Bitemporal hemianopia
  • It is associated with MEN1 disease.
      Schwannoma
      [17][18][19][20]
      +
      • Split-fat sign
      • Fascicular sign
      • Often have areas of hemosiderin
      • S100+
      Primary CNS lymphoma
      [21][22]
      + +/− +/− +
      • Single mass with ring enhancement
        Childhood primary brain tumors
        Pilocytic astrocytoma
        [23][24][25]
        + +/− +/− +
        Medulloblastoma
        [26][27][28]
        + +/− +/− +
        • Homer wright rosettes
        Ependymoma
        [29][4]
        + +/− +/− +
        • Hydrocephalus
        • Causes an unusually persistent, continuous headache in children.
        Craniopharyngioma
        [30][31][32][4]
        + +/− + Bitemporal hemianopia +
        Pinealoma
        [33][34][35]
        + +/− +/− + vertical gaze palsy
        • May cause prinaud syndrome (vertical gaze palsy, pupillary light-near dissociation, lid retraction and convergence-retraction nystagmus
        Vascular
        AV malformation
        [36][37][4]
        + + +/− +/−
        Brain aneurysm
        [38][39][40][41][42]
        + +/− +/− +/−
        • MRA and CTA
        Infectious
        Bacterial brain abscess
        [43][44]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Central hypodense signal and surrounding ring-enhancement in T1
        • Central hyperintense area surrounded by a well-defined hypointense capsule with surrounding edema in T2
        • History/ imaging
        Tuberculosis
        [45][4][46]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Lab data/ Imaging
        Toxoplasmosis
        [47][48]
        + +/− +/− +
        • History/ imaging
        Hydatid cyst
        [49][4]
        + +/− +/− +/− +
        • Imaging
        CNS cryptococcosis
        [50]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • We may see numerous acutely branching septate hyphae
        • Lab data/ Imaging
        CNS aspergillosis
        [51]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Multiple abscesses
        • Ring enhancement
        • Peripheral low signal intensity on T2
        • We may see numerous acutely branching septate hyphae
        • Lab data/ Imaging
        Other
        Brain metastasis
        [52][4]
        + +/− +/− + +
        • Based on the primary cancer type we may have different immunohistopathology findings.
        • History/ imaging

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 DDx of glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/glioblastoma
        2. Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
        3. Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
        4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
        5. Smits M (2016). “Imaging of oligodendroglioma”. Br J Radiol. 89 (1060): 20150857. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150857. PMC 4846213. PMID 26849038.
        6. Wesseling P, van den Bent M, Perry A (June 2015). “Oligodendroglioma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers”. Acta Neuropathol. 129 (6): 809–27. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1424-1. PMC 4436696. PMID 25943885.
        7. Kerkhof M, Benit C, Duran-Pena A, Vecht CJ (2015). “Seizures in oligodendroglial tumors”. CNS Oncol. 4 (5): 347–56. doi:10.2217/cns.15.29. PMC 6082346. PMID 26478444.
        8. Zee CS, Chin T, Segall HD, Destian S, Ahmadi J (June 1992). “Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas”. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 13 (3): 154–69. PMID 1642904.
        9. Shibuya M (2015). “Pathology and molecular genetics of meningioma: recent advances”. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 55 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0233. PMID 25744347.
        10. Begnami MD, Palau M, Rushing EJ, Santi M, Quezado M (September 2007). “Evaluation of NF2 gene deletion in sporadic schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas by chromogenic in situ hybridization”. Hum. Pathol. 38 (9): 1345–50. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.027. PMC 2094208. PMID 17509660.
        11. Lonser RR, Butman JA, Huntoon K, Asthagiri AR, Wu T, Bakhtian KD, Chew EY, Zhuang Z, Linehan WM, Oldfield EH (May 2014). “Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease”. J. Neurosurg. 120 (5): 1055–62. doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131431. PMC 4762041. PMID 24579662.
        12. Hussein MR (October 2007). “Central nervous system capillary haemangioblastoma: the pathologist’s viewpoint”. Int J Exp Pathol. 88 (5): 311–24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2007.00535.x. PMC 2517334. PMID 17877533.
        13. Lee SR, Sanches J, Mark AS, Dillon WP, Norman D, Newton TH (May 1989). “Posterior fossa hemangioblastomas: MR imaging”. Radiology. 171 (2): 463–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704812. PMID 2704812.
        14. Perks WH, Cross JN, Sivapragasam S, Johnson P (March 1976). “Supratentorial haemangioblastoma with polycythaemia”. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 39 (3): 218–20. PMID 945331.
        15. Kucharczyk W, Davis DO, Kelly WM, Sze G, Norman D, Newton TH (December 1986). “Pituitary adenomas: high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T”. Radiology. 161 (3): 761–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786729. PMID 3786729.
        16. Syro LV, Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Toledo RA, Londoño FJ, Ortiz LD, Rotondo F, Horvath E, Uribe H (2012). “Pituitary tumors in patients with MEN1 syndrome”. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 67 Suppl 1: 43–8. PMC 3328811. PMID 22584705.
        17. Donnelly, Martin J.; Daly, Carmel A.; Briggs, Robert J. S. (2007). “MR imaging features of an intracochlear acoustic schwannoma”. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 108 (12). doi:10.1017/S0022215100129056. ISSN 0022-2151.
        18. Feany MB, Anthony DC, Fletcher CD (May 1998). “Nerve sheath tumours with hybrid features of neurofibroma and schwannoma: a conceptual challenge”. Histopathology. 32 (5): 405–10. PMID 9639114.
        19. Chen H, Xue L, Wang H, Wang Z, Wu H (July 2017). “Differential NF2 Gene Status in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas and its Prognostic Impact on Tumour Growth Patterns”. Sci Rep. 7 (1): 5470. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05769-0. PMID 28710469.
        20. Hardell, Lennart; Hansson Mild, Kjell; Sandström, Monica; Carlberg, Michael; Hallquist, Arne; Påhlson, Anneli (2003). “Vestibular Schwannoma, Tinnitus and Cellular Telephones”. Neuroepidemiology. 22 (2): 124–129. doi:10.1159/000068745. ISSN 0251-5350.
        21. Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
        22. Paulus, Werner (1999). “Classification, Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology of Primary CNS Lymphomas”. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 43 (3): 203–208. doi:10.1023/A:1006242116122. ISSN 0167-594X.
        23. Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA (November 2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma”. Neurol Clin. 25 (4): 1111–39, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.004. PMID 17964028.
        24. Pedersen CL, Romner B (January 2013). “Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.002. PMID 22819718.
        25. Mattle, Heinrich (2017). Fundamentals of neurology : an illustrated guide. Stuttgart New York: Thieme. ISBN 9783131364524.
        26. Dorwart, R H; Wara, W M; Norman, D; Levin, V A (1981). “Complete myelographic evaluation of spinal metastases from medulloblastoma”. Radiology. 139 (2): 403–408. doi:10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220886. ISSN 0033-8419.
        27. Fruehwald-Pallamar, Julia; Puchner, Stefan B.; Rossi, Andrea; Garre, Maria L.; Cama, Armando; Koelblinger, Claus; Osborn, Anne G.; Thurnher, Majda M. (2011). “Magnetic resonance imaging spectrum of medulloblastoma”. Neuroradiology. 53 (6): 387–396. doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0829-8. ISSN 0028-3940.
        28. Burger, P. C.; Grahmann, F. C.; Bliestle, A.; Kleihues, P. (1987). “Differentiation in the medulloblastoma”. Acta Neuropathologica. 73 (2): 115–123. doi:10.1007/BF00693776. ISSN 0001-6322.
        29. Yuh, E. L.; Barkovich, A. J.; Gupta, N. (2009). “Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT”. Child’s Nervous System. 25 (10): 1203–1213. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0878-7. ISSN 0256-7040.
        30. Brunel H, Raybaud C, Peretti-Viton P, Lena G, Girard N, Paz-Paredes A, Levrier O, Farnarier P, Manera L, Choux M (September 2002). “[Craniopharyngioma in children: MRI study of 43 cases]”. Neurochirurgie (in French). 48 (4): 309–18. PMID 12407316.
        31. Prabhu, Vikram C.; Brown, Henry G. (2005). “The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas”. Child’s Nervous System. 21 (8–9): 622–627. doi:10.1007/s00381-005-1190-9. ISSN 0256-7040.
        32. Kennedy HB, Smith RJ (December 1975). “Eye signs in craniopharyngioma”. Br J Ophthalmol. 59 (12): 689–95. PMC 1017436. PMID 766825.
        33. Ahmed SR, Shalet SM, Price DA, Pearson D (September 1983). “Human chorionic gonadotrophin secreting pineal germinoma and precocious puberty”. Arch. Dis. Child. 58 (9): 743–5. PMID 6625640.
        34. Sano, Keiji (1976). “Pinealoma in Children”. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1159/000119602. ISSN 1016-2291.
        35. Baggenstoss, Archie H. (1939). “PINEALOMAS”. Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry. 41 (6): 1187. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1939.02270180115011. ISSN 0096-6754.
        36. Kucharczyk, W; Lemme-Pleghos, L; Uske, A; Brant-Zawadzki, M; Dooms, G; Norman, D (1985). “Intracranial vascular malformations: MR and CT imaging”. Radiology. 156 (2): 383–389. doi:10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011900. ISSN 0033-8419.
        37. Fleetwood, Ian G; Steinberg, Gary K (2002). “Arteriovenous malformations”. The Lancet. 359 (9309): 863–873. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1. ISSN 0140-6736.
        38. Chapman, Arlene B.; Rubinstein, David; Hughes, Richard; Stears, John C.; Earnest, Michael P.; Johnson, Ann M.; Gabow, Patricia A.; Kaehny, William D. (1992). “Intracranial Aneurysms in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (13): 916–920. doi:10.1056/NEJM199209243271303. ISSN 0028-4793.
        39. Castori M, Voermans NC (October 2014). “Neurological manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s): A review”. Iran J Neurol. 13 (4): 190–208. PMC 4300794. PMID 25632331.
        40. Schievink, W. I.; Raissi, S. S.; Maya, M. M.; Velebir, A. (2010). “Screening for intracranial aneurysms in patients with bicuspid aortic valve”. Neurology. 74 (18): 1430–1433. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1acf. ISSN 0028-3878.
        41. Germain DP (May 2017). “Pseudoxanthoma elasticum”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 12 (1): 85. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0639-8. PMC 5424392. PMID 28486967.
        42. Farahmand M, Farahangiz S, Yadollahi M (October 2013). “Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; A Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography”. Bull Emerg Trauma. 1 (4): 147–51. PMC 4789449. PMID 27162847.
        43. Haimes, AB; Zimmerman, RD; Morgello, S; Weingarten, K; Becker, RD; Jennis, R; Deck, MD (1989). “MR imaging of brain abscesses”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 152 (5): 1073–1085. doi:10.2214/ajr.152.5.1073. ISSN 0361-803X.
        44. Brouwer, Matthijs C.; Tunkel, Allan R.; McKhann, Guy M.; van de Beek, Diederik (2014). “Brain Abscess”. New England Journal of Medicine. 371 (5): 447–456. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1301635. ISSN 0028-4793.
        45. Morgado, Carlos; Ruivo, Nuno (2005). “Imaging meningo-encephalic tuberculosis”. European Journal of Radiology. 55 (2): 188–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.017. ISSN 0720-048X.
        46. Be NA, Kim KS, Bishai WR, Jain SK (March 2009). “Pathogenesis of central nervous system tuberculosis”. Curr. Mol. Med. 9 (2): 94–9. PMC 4486069. PMID 19275620.
        47. Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Miller RF, Kendall BE, Newman SP, Harrison MJ (December 1995). “Toxoplasmosis and primary central nervous system lymphoma in HIV infection: diagnosis with MR spectroscopy”. Radiology. 197 (3): 649–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480733. PMID 7480733.
        48. Helton KJ, Maron G, Mamcarz E, Leventaki V, Patay Z, Sadighi Z (November 2016). “Unusual magnetic resonance imaging presentation of post-BMT cerebral toxoplasmosis masquerading as meningoencephalitis and ventriculitis”. Bone Marrow Transplant. 51 (11): 1533–1536. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.168. PMID 27348541.
        49. Taslakian B, Darwish H (September 2016). “Intracranial hydatid cyst: imaging findings of a rare disease”. BMJ Case Rep. 2016. doi:10.1136/bcr-2016-216570. PMC 5030532. PMID 27620198.
        50. McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.
        51. McCarthy M, Rosengart A, Schuetz AN, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ (July 2014). “Mold infections of the central nervous system”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (2): 150–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1216008. PMC 4840461. PMID 25006721.
        52. Pope WB (2018). “Brain metastases: neuroimaging”. Handb Clin Neurol. 149: 89–112. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4. PMC 6118134. PMID 29307364.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Epidemiology and Demographics

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

        Overview

        Glioblastoma multiforme is the the most common adult primary intracranial neoplasm worldwide. The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme is estimated to be 3.2 cases per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Glioblastoma multiforme is a common disease that tends to affect older adults and the elderly population. The median age at diagnosis is 64 years. Males are more commonly affected with glioblastoma multiforme than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.5 to 1. Glioblastoma multiforme usually affects individuals of the Caucasian race.

        Epidemiology and Demographics

        Incidence

        • Glioblastoma multiforme is the the most common adult primary intracranial neoplasm worldwide.[1]
        • The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme is estimated to be 3.2 cases per 100,000 individuals worldwide.[2]
        • This is highest IR among brain and CNS tumors with malignant behavior. [3]
        • Incidence is highest in the northeast and lowest in the south-central region of US.[4]

        Mortality rate

        • Glioblastoma multiforme is the most malignant astrocytoma.[5]
        • The median overall survival (OS) is approximately 12 months and a 5‐year OS of 4.8%‐5.4%.

        Age

        • Glioblastoma multiforme is a common disease that tends to affect older adults and the elderly population.
        • The median age at diagnosis is 64 years.[2]
        • The incidence increases with age peaking at 75–84 years and drops after 85 years.[4]
        • Glioblastoma multiforme is uncommon in children.

        Gender

        • Males are more commonly affected with glioblastoma multiforme than females.
        • The male to female ratio is approximately 1.6 to 1.[1]
        • Marital status is an independent prognostic factor for GBM.[6]
        • One observational study shows protective effect of marriage on GBM survival especially in male older than 60 years of age.[6]

        Race

        • Incidence of GBM is 2.0 times higher in Caucasians compared to Africans and Afro-Americans. [7]
        • There is lower incidence in Asians and American Indians.[8]

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Epidemiology of glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/glioblastoma
        2. 2.0 2.1 Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C, Ostrom QT, Lightner DD, Barnholtz-Sloan JS; et al. (2014). “Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 23 (10): 1985–96. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275. PMC 4185005. PMID 25053711.
        3. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (August 2007). “The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system”. Acta Neuropathol. 114 (2): 97–109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. PMC 1929165. PMID 17618441.
        4. 4.0 4.1 Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, Ondracek A, Chen Y, Wolinsky Y, Stroup NE, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (November 2013). “CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010”. Neuro-oncology. 15 Suppl 2: ii1–56. doi:10.1093/neuonc/not151. PMC 3798196. PMID 24137015.
        5. Yabroff KR, Harlan L, Zeruto C, Abrams J, Mann B (March 2012). “Patterns of care and survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme diagnosed during 2006”. Neuro-oncology. 14 (3): 351–9. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor218. PMC 3280803. PMID 22241797.
        6. 6.0 6.1 Xie JC, Yang S, Liu XY, Zhao YX (August 2018). “Effect of marital status on survival in glioblastoma multiforme by demographics, education, economic factors, and insurance status”. Cancer Med. 7 (8): 3722–3742. doi:10.1002/cam4.1688. PMC 6089174. PMID 30009575.
        7. Sturm D, Bender S, Jones DT, Lichter P, Grill J, Becher O, Hawkins C, Majewski J, Jones C, Costello JF, Iavarone A, Aldape K, Brennan CW, Jabado N, Pfister SM (February 2014). “Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge”. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 14 (2): 92–107. doi:10.1038/nrc3655. PMC 4003223. PMID 24457416.
        8. Jiang L, Fang X, Bao Y, Zhou JY, Shen XY, Ding MH, Chen Y, Hu GH, Lu YC (2013). “Association between the XRCC1 polymorphisms and glioma risk: a meta-analysis of case-control studies”. PLoS ONE. 8 (1): e55597. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055597. PMC 3559473. PMID 23383237.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Risk Factors

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        Common risk factors in the development of glioblastoma multiforme are radiation exposure, viruses, polyvinyl chloride, alcohol, and genetic disorders.[1]

        Risk Factors

        Common risk factors in the development of glioblastoma multiforme are:[1]

        References

        1. 1.0 1.1 Risk factors of glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/glioblastoma


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Screening

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sujit Routray, M.D. [2]

        Overview

        Screening for glioblastoma multiforme is not recommended.

        Screening

        Screening for glioblastoma multiforme is not recommended.

        References


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

        Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]

        Overview

        If left untreated, glioblastoma multiforme may extend into the meninges, ventricular wall, or spinal cord. Common complications of glioblastoma multiforme include herniation, hydrocephalus, systemic illness, brainstem invasion by tumor, neutron-induced cerebral injury, weakness, fatigue, numbness, surgical complications, and coma. Prognosis is generally poor, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is less than 10%.

        Natural History

        Complications

        Common complications of glioblastoma multiforme include:[1]

        Prognosis

        • Prognosis is generally poor, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is less than 10%.
        • Negative prognostic factors include:[2]
        • With standard treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), the median survival is approximately 14 months.[3]
        • Removal of 98% or more of the tumor by surgery has been associated with a better prognosis.

        References

        1. Silbergeld DL, Rostomily RC, Alvord EC (1991). “The cause of death in patients with glioblastoma is multifactorial: clinical factors and autopsy findings in 117 cases of supratentorial glioblastoma in adults”. J Neurooncol. 10 (2): 179–85. PMID 1654403.
        2. Prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme. Dr Dylan Kurda and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/glioblastoma
        3. Stupp R, Mason W, van den Bent M, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn M, Belanger K, Brandes A, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer R, Ludwin S, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross J, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff R (2005). “Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma”. N Engl J Med. 352 (10): 987–96. PMID 15758009.


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Diagnosis

        Diagnosis

        Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

        Treatment

        Treatment

        Medical Therapy | Surgery | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

        Case Studies

        Case Studies

        Case#1

        Template:Nervous tissue tumors


        Template:WikiDoc Sources

        Looking for the patient version?

        Back to the patient-friendly article

        © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH