Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Ameloblastoma

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Synonyms and keywords: adamantinoma of the jaw; mandibular ameloblastoma; maxillary ameloblastoma; odontogenic tumor

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Ameloblastoma is a rare, benign tumor of odontogenic epithelium much more commonly appearing in the mandible than the maxilla. While these tumors are rarely malignant or metastatic (that is, they rarely spread to other parts of the body), and progress slowly, the resulting lesions can cause severe abnormalities of the face and jaw. Odontogenic tumors comprise of a complex group of lesions of diverse histopathological types and clinical behavior. Of all swellings of the oral cavity, 9% are odontogenic tumors and within this group, ameloblastoma accounts for 1% of lesions. WHO defines it as a locally invasive polymorphic neoplasia that often has a follicular or plexiform pattern in a fibrous stroma. Its behavior has been described as being benign but locally aggressive. In 20% of all cases the tumor can be found in the `maxilla, predominantly in the canine or molar region. Within the mandible, 70% are located in the molar region or the ascending ramus, 20% in the premolar region and 10% in the anterior part. Ameloblastoma was first described in 1868 by Broca. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be classified into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the clinicoradiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups: solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, mulitcystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastomas. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E. There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastomas. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E. The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years: the median age at diagnosis is 39 years. The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years: the median age at diagnosis is 39 years. Symptoms of ameloblastoma include mouth sores, painless swelling, loose teeth, facial deformity, swelling and numbness of the jaw, pain surrounding the teeth or jaw, and pain associated with the tissue growth, if ameloblastoma spreads to the sinus cavities and floor of the nose. The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.

Historical Perspective

Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca. This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.

Classification

Ameloblastoma may be classified based on histopathology into six subtypes including follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, basal cell, granular cell, and desmoplastic. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be divided into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the radiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups including solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant.

Pathophysiology

Ameloblastoma arise from remnants of ameloblast or dental lamina, dentigerous cysts, or basal layer of oral mucosa. There is evidence that suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, multicystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E

Causes

There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma may be the result of either decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 which helps in inhibition of the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or it is may be due to increased expression of α5β1 integrin which participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma.

Differential Diagnosis

Ameloblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause symptoms similar to those of ameloblastoma, such as dentigerous cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, odontogenic myxoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, hard odontoma, osteosarcoma, and globulomaxillary cysts

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively, worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years; the median age at diagnosis is 39 years  

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma. It is thought that common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma may be dentigerous cyst, impacted teeth, injury to the mouth or jaw, infections of the teeth or gums, inflammation of the teeth or gums, infections by viruses, and lack of protein or minerals in the person’s diet, and Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.

Screening

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for ameloblastoma is not recommended.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

In several cases, the patients with ameloblastoma are asymptomatic. Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of ameloblastoma include mouth sores, painless swelling, loose teeth, facial deformity, swelling and numbness of the jaw, pain surrounding the teeth or jaw, and pain associated with the tissue growth, if ameloblastoma spreads to the sinus cavities and floor of the nasal cavity.  

Physical Examination

Patients with ameloblastoma usually appear normal and clinical presentation of an ameloblastoma is usually limited. Common physical examination findings of ameloblastoma include facial asymmetry, swelling, and hemorrhage.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with ameloblastoma.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with amelobastoma.

Head X Ray

A head x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of ameloblastoma include polycystic, honeycombed mass arising within the alveolar border of the jaw.

CT

Head CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on CT scan suggestive of ameloblastoma include multiloculated, soap-bubble” lesion, erosion of the adjacent tooth roots and well demarcated borders with no matrix calcification.

MRI

Head and neck MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on MRI diagnostic of ameloblastoma include mixed solid and cystic pattern, thick irregular walls with papillary solid structures projecting into the lesion.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on an ultrasound suggestive of ameloblastoma include cystic mass with solid contents, flow signals, multilocular and honeycomb appearance.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings findings associated with acoustic neuroma.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for ameloblastoma include incisional biopsy. Incisional biopsy is diagnostic of ameloblastoma.

Medical Therapy

The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.

Surgery

The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. The predominant therapy for ameloblastoma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.

Primary Prevention

There are no primary preventive measures available for ameloblastoma.

Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention strategies following ameloblastoma include follow-up examination at regular intervals for at least 10 years.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca. This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

  • Ameloblastoma was recognized in 1827 by Cusack.[1][2]
  • Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca in 1868 and has been called adamantinoma, adamantoblastoma, epithelial odontoma, and a multilocular cyst.
  • Ameloblastoma originates from the early English word ‘amel’, meaning enamel and the Greek word ‘blastos’, meaning germ.
  • This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma in 1885 by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.
  • This tumor was previously called adamantinoma. However, this term is considered inaccurate now and is not used.
  • It was finally renamed to the modern name ameloblastoma in 1930 by Ivey and Churchill.

References

  1. Goldwyn, Robert; Constable, John; Murray, Joseph E. (1963). “Ameloblastoma of the Jaw”. New England Journal of Medicine. 269 (3): 126–129. doi:10.1056/NEJM196307182690303. ISSN 0028-4793.
  2. Pandya NJ, Stuteville OH (1972). “Treatment of ameloblastoma”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 50 (3): 242–8. PMID 4115148.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

Ameloblastoma may be classified based on histopathology into six subtypes including follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, basal cell, granular cell, and desmoplastic. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be divided into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the radiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups including solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant.

Classification

Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the location:[1][2][3][4][5]

Based on radiology, intraosseous ameloblastoma may be subclassified into two groups which includes the following:

  • Solid/multicystic
    • More commonly reoccur
  • Unicystic
    • Unlikely to reoccur
    • Classically found in younger individuals

Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the clinicoradiologic into four groups:[6][1][2][3][4][7]

  • Solid or multicystic
    • Solid ameloblastoma is the most common form of the lesion.
    • Approximately 86% of the ameloblastoma are solid. It has a tendency to be more aggressive than the other types and has a higher incidence of recurrence.
    • Multicystic ameloblastomacan infiltrate into the adjacent tissue and may metastasize and has the ability to recur.
    • It is prevalent in a slightly older age group than the unicystic ameloblastoma.
    • Radiographically, the appearance is generally multilocular or unilocular.
  • Unicystic
    • Unicystic ameloblastoma has a large cystic cavity with intraluminal, luminal, or mural proliferation of ameloblastic cells.
    • Unicystic ameloblastoma is a less aggressive variant and it has a low rate of recurrence although lesions showing mural invasion are an exception and should be treated more aggressively.
    • The unicystic ameloblastoma usually appears as a “cystic” lesion with either an intramural or an intraluminal proliferation of the cystic lining.
    • Radiographically, it can resemble a well-circumscribed slow-growing radiolucency.[7]
  • Peripheral
  • Malignant
    • The malignant ameloblastoma is a rare entity. It is defined as an ameloblastoma that has already metastasized but still maintains its classical microscopic features.
    • The WHO classification of odontogenic tumors (2005) defines malignant ameloblastoma as, “an ameloblastoma that metastasizes in spite of a benign histological appearance”.
    • Even if metastasis is absent, ameloblastoma with cytological atypia is defined as ameloblastic carcinoma.
    • Thus, malignant ameloblastoma is defined as a retrospective diagnosis that can only be made when metastasis occurs.
    • In majority of cases, it not only maintains the histological characteristics of the parent tumor but also continues to display similarly indolent clinical behavior.

Differentiating features of three different subtypes of ameloblastoma is shown below in a tabular form:

Subtypes of Ameloblastoma Percentage of Ameloblastoma Age Sites affected Additional features
Multicystic/Conventional Ameloblastoma (also known as Solid Ameloblastoma)
  • The tumor is usually seen in middle-aged adults, around the age of 40 years
    • It is more prevalent among African-American population
    Unicystic Ameloblastoma (also known as Cystic Ameloblastoma)
    • It affects men more than women, with 65% of the affected individuals being males
    • It is usually seen in younger individuals with an average age of 25 years
    • A majority of these tumors occur in the lower jaw (over 90%)
    Peripheral Ameloblastoma
    • Peripheral ameloblastoma typically affect individuals aged between 40-60 years
    • Both men and women are equally affected

    Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the histology:[8]

    Subtypes of Ameloblastoma Features
    Follicular
    • Histologically, follicular ameloblastoma are the most common type of ameloblastoma.
    • The follicular pattern consist of islands of epithelial cells with a central mass of polyhedral cells or loosely arranged angular cells resembling stellate reticulum, which are surrounded by well organized single layer of cuboidal or tall columnar cells with nuclei placed at the opposite pole of basement membrane resembling pre-ameloblasts.
    • This peripheral cell layer tends to show cytoplasmic vacuolization. Cystic formation is often seen in the center of the epithelial islands due to degeneration of stellate reticulum like cells.
    Plexiform
    • The tumor epithelium is arranged in form of trabeculae which is bound by a layer of cuboidal or columnar cells and stellate reticulum like areas are usually minimal.
    • Cyst formation occurs but is usually due to stromal degeneration rather than cystic change in the epithelium. The stroma consists of loose, vascular sparsely cellular connective tissue.
    Acanthomatous
    Granular cell
    • The tumors are referred to as granular cell ameloblastoma, when the central stellate reticulum cells show extensive granular cell transformation i.e. in the form of sheets of large eosinophilic granular cells.
    • Ultrastructurally, it is seen that the granules consist of pleomorphic, osmiophilic, lysosome like organelles.
    Basal cell
    • This variant shows predominant basaloid pattern consisting of darkly stained cells with minimal cytoplasm and little evidence of palisading at the periphery resembling those seen in basal cell carcinoma.
    Desmoplastic
    • Desmoplastic ameloblastoma is characterized by extensive stromal collagenization or desmoplasia surrounding compressed small/irregular islands of odontogenic epithelium making it a distinct entity.
    • Cyst formation is common and ameloblast like areas are present only in small foci.
    • Calcification in the fibrous stroma and occasional bone formation can also be seen.
    • Histochemical evaluation of the collagen suggests that the dense stroma is not scar tissue but represents active de novo synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins.
    • It typically presents radiographically as a mixed radiolucency and radiopacity mimicking a fibro osseous lesion.
    • In contrast to typical ameloblastoma, this variant frequents the maxilla and the anterior region of the jaws.
    Unicystic
    • Unicystic ameloblastoma is considered as an in-situ or superficially invasive form of ameloblastoma and consists of a single cyst lined by ameloblastic epithelium.
    • It presents clinically similar to a dentigerous cyst and is usually associated with an impacted tooth (usually 3rd molars).
    • They are usually seen in younger patients with an average age of diagnosis being 22 years and generally involve the mandible.
    • It histologically presents as a single cyst lined by ameloblastomatous epithelium and is divided into several subgroups based on pattern and extent of ameloblastomatous proliferation in relation to cyst wall.
    • Unicystic ameloblastoma may be classified into four subtypes based on a classification by Reichart et al. which was modified by Ackermann et al.
      • 1. Luminal unicystic ameloblastoma: It is a cystic lesion lined by epithelium which exhibits columnar differentiation and reverse polarization of the basal cell layer. The connective tissue adjacent to the epithelium often exhibits a uniform, thin band like area of hyalinization.
      • 1.2. Luminal and intraluminal unicystic ameloblastoma: It is the simple type but exhibits one or more nodules projecting into the lumen. No extension is seen into the surrounding connective tissue wall. Occasionally, this form of unicystic ameloblastoma can produce an intraluminal plexiform pattern of odontogenic epithelium that lacks typical ameloblastomatous differentiation and is called as unicystic plexiform ameloblastoma.
      • 1.2.3. Luminal, intraluminal and intramural unicystic ameloblastoma: Here there is occurrence of intramural proliferation of ameloblastoma along with subgroup 1.2 features.
      • 1.3. Luminal and intramural unicystic ameloblastoma: It exhibits a cyst with a luminal lining in combination with intramural nodules of SMA tissues. The intramural ameloblastoma tissue may be seen as an infiltration from the cyst lining or as free islands of follicular ameloblastoma.
    Peripheral
    • Peripheral ameloblastoma present histologically with follicular or plexiform pattern as well as acanthomatous pattern. In most cases, the tumor is well separated from the overlying epithelium but many are confluent with the overlying mucosa.
    Other rare varients
    • Clear cell variant which may contain clear PAS positive cells are localized in the stellate reticulum like areas.
    • Papilliferous keratoameloblastoma show occurrence of areas of ameloblastoma with keratinisation, tumor islands with papilliferous appearance along with cystic areas resembling odontogenic keratocysts.
    • Mucous cells can also be demonstrated rarely in ameloblastoma.

    References

    1. 1.0 1.1 Singh M, Shah A, Bhattacharya A, Raman R, Ranganatha N, Prakash P (2014). “Treatment algorithm for ameloblastoma”. Case Rep Dent. 2014: 121032. doi:10.1155/2014/121032. PMC 4274852. PMID 25548685.
    2. 2.0 2.1 Gümgüm S, Hoşgören B (2005). “Clinical and radiologic behaviour of ameloblastoma in 4 cases”. J Can Dent Assoc. 71 (7): 481–4. PMID 16026635.
    3. 3.0 3.1 Toledo-Pereyra LH, Bergren CT (1987). “Liver preservation techniques for transplantation”. Artif Organs. 11 (3): 214–23. PMID 3304226.
    4. 4.0 4.1 Poser CM (1973). “Demyelination in the central nervous system in chronic alcoholism: central pontine myelinolysis and Marchiafava-Bignami’s disease”. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 215: 373–81. PMID 4513681.
    5. Ameloblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
    6. Laborde, A.; Nicot, R.; Wojcik, T.; Ferri, J.; Raoul, G. (2017). “Ameloblastoma of the jaws: Management and recurrence rate”. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 134 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.004. ISSN 1879-7296.
    7. 7.0 7.1 Ameloblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
    8. Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Pathophysiology


    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivali Marketkar, M.B.B.S. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]

    Overview

    Ameloblastoma arise from remnants of ameloblast or dental lamina, dentigerous cysts, or basal layer of oral mucosa. There is evidence that suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, multicystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E.

    Pathophysiology

    Pathogenesis

    Genetics

    Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include:

    Gross Pathology

    On gross pathology the following are the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma:[7][8][9]

    Microscopic Pathology

    On microscopic examination, the following characteristic findings of ameloblastoma are present:

    • Stellate reticulum – star-shaped cells, found in a developing tooth[10][11]
    • Giant cells may or may not be present
    • Subepithelial hyalinization may or may not be present
    • Seen deep to the basement membrane
    • Suprabasal cells loosely textured and noncohesive, resembling stellate reticulum
    • The plexiform type has epithelium that proliferates in a “Fish Net Pattern”
    • The follicular type will have outer arrangement of columnar or palisaded ameloblast like cells and inner zone of triangular shaped cells resembling stellate reticulum in bell stage. The central cells sometimes degenerate to form central microcysts
    • No enamel or dentin formation
    • Tall columnar cells
      • Palisaded nuclei with reverse polarization
        • Reverse polarization of nuclei = nuclei distant from the basement membrane/nuclei at pole opposite of basement membrane
        • Palisaded nuclei = picket fence appearance; columnar-shaped nuclei with long axis perpendicular to the basement membrane (key feature)
      • Subnuclear vacuolation
    • The following are the different histopathological variants of ameloblastoma:[2][1]
      • Intraosseous (follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, multicystic, unicystic, granular cell [lysosomes by EM], basal cell, desmoplastic)
      • Extraosseous (follicular, plexiform, basal cell)

    The image shows the characteristic features:[12]

    • Subnuclear vacuolation in palisading cell – vacuoles at the basement membrane aspect
    • Loose stroma around the islands of cells
    • Star-like cells at the centre of the islands of cells (stellate reticulum)

    Video

    {{#ev:youtube|VW5aSalmyF0}}

    References

    1. 1.0 1.1 Ameloblastoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
    2. 2.0 2.1 Ameloblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
    3. Pandya NJ, Stuteville OH (1972). “Treatment of ameloblastoma”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 50 (3): 242–8. PMID 4115148.
    4. Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.
    5. Brazis PW, Miller NR, Lee AG, Holliday MJ (1995). “Neuro-ophthalmologic Aspects of Ameloblastoma”. Skull Base Surg. 5 (4): 233–44. PMC 1656531. PMID 17170964.
    6. McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
    7. Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Fernandes R, Malyapa RS, Mendenhall NP (December 2007). “Ameloblastoma”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 30 (6): 645–8. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e3181573e59. PMID 18091060.
    8. Dunfee BL, Sakai O, Pistey R, Gohel A (2006). “Radiologic and pathologic characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of the mandible”. Radiographics. 26 (6): 1751–68. doi:10.1148/rg.266055189. PMID 17102048.
    9. McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
    10. Gardner DG, Corio RL (April 1984). “Plexiform unicystic ameloblastoma. A variant of ameloblastoma with a low-recurrence rate after enucleation”. Cancer. 53 (8): 1730–5. PMID 6697311.
    11. McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
    12. Gruica B, Stauffer E, Buser D, Bornstein M. (2003). “Ameloblastoma of the follicular, plexiform, and acanthomatous type in the maxillary sinus: a case report”. Quintessence International. 34 (4): 311–4. PMID 12731620. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Causes

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2], Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

    Overview

    There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma may be the result of either decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 which helps in inhibition of the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or it is may be due to increased expression of α5β1 integrin which participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma.

    Causes

    Common Causes

    Common causes of ameloblastoma may include:[1][2]

    Less Common Causes

    Less common causes of ameloblastoma may include:[2]

    Genetic Causes

    • Ameloblastoma is caused by a mutation in the FGFR2-RAS-BRAF V600E gene.[3][4]

    References

    1. Jeddy, Nadeem; Jeeva, Sathiya; Jeyapradha, T; Lakshmipathy, P; Saikrishna, P; Ananthalakshmi, R (2013). “The molecular and genetic aspects in the pathogenesis and treatment of ameloblastoma”. Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences. 2 (3): 157. doi:10.4103/2277-8632.117179. ISSN 2277-8632.
    2. 2.0 2.1 Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.
    3. Brown NA, Rolland D, McHugh JB, Weigelin HC, Zhao L, Lim MS, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Betz BL (November 2014). “Activating FGFR2-RAS-BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma”. Clin. Cancer Res. 20 (21): 5517–26. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1069. PMID 24993163.
    4. Kurppa KJ, Catón J, Morgan PR, Ristimäki A, Ruhin B, Kellokoski J, Elenius K, Heikinheimo K (April 2014). “High frequency of BRAF V600E mutations in ameloblastoma”. J. Pathol. 232 (5): 492–8. doi:10.1002/path.4317. PMC 4255689. PMID 24374844.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Differentiating Ameloblastoma from other Diseases

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

    Overview

    Ameloblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause symptoms similar to those of ameloblastoma, such as dentigerous cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, odontogenic myxoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, hard odontoma, osteosarcoma, and globulomaxillary cysts.

    Differential Diagnosis

    Differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma include the following:[1]

    Osteosarcoma must be differentiated from:Osteomyelitis, Pediatric Osteomyelitis, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, Metastases from other malignancies, Fibrous dysplasia, Giant cell tumors, Ewing’s sarcoma, Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, Lymphoma Osteoblastoma, Aneurysmal bone cyst, Fibrosarcoma and Cortical desmoid.

    Disease History/demography Symptoms Physical examination Diagnosis
    Palpable mass Pain Others Mass tenderness Others Genetics Imaging Histology
    Rhabdomyosarcoma[2][3][4][5]
    • Most common soft tissue cancer among children and adolescents
    • The third most common extracranial solid tumors
    • Two-third of all cases happen under 6 years old
    + + +/-

    Mutations in:

    CT scan:

    Ultrasound:

    MRI:

    Wilms tumor[6][7][8][9][10] + + +/- Present mutations of: Ultrasound:

    CT scan:

    Ewing sarcoma[11][12][13][14] + + + Radiographic of region:

    CT scan:

    MRI:

    Pediatric neuroblastoma [15][16][17][18]

    Age distribution:

    • < 1 years old ( 40%)
    • 1-2 years old (35%)
    • > 2 years old (25%)

    + (Abdominal)

    +

    +(Abdominal)

    CT scan:

    MRI:

    Pediatric pheochromocytoma[19][20][21][22] +/- Genetic mutation in: Ultrasound:

    CT scan:

    MRI (in extra adrenal tumors):

    • T1:
      • Heterogenous enhancement
      • Hypointense
    • T2:
      • Hyperintense
    • T1 C+ (Gd):
      • Heterogenous enhancement

    Positive stains for:

    Pediatric osteosarcoma[23][24][25] + + + Radiography:

    CT scan:

    MRI:

    Pediatric liposarcoma[26][27][28][29] + +/-
    • N/A
    CT scan:

    MRI:

    Divided into following subtypes:

    Common findings:

    Pediatric acute myelocytic leukemia[30][31][32][33] +/- ( Abdominal mass, mediastinal mass) + (bone pain, joint pain) +/- Genetic translocations include:
    • t (8;21)
    • t (3;21)
    • t (15;17)
    Radiography:

    CT scan/ MRI:

    Radionuclide imaging:

    Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia[34][35]

    +/-( Extramedullary mass in abdomen/ head/ neck)

    +/- (Musculoskeletal pain) Chromosomal translocations:
    • t (9;22)
    • t (12;21)
    • t (5;14)
    • t (1;19)
    Radiography:

    Chest x ray:

    Bone x ray:

    Brain MRI:

    Divided into 3 subgroups:

    L1:

    L2:

    L3:

    Pediatric non-hodgkin lymphoma[36][37][38] + + (Chest tenderness) Radiography:

    CT scan:

    Ultrasound:

    Histology findings of non-hodgkin lymphoma depend on:



    References

    1. “Differential Diagnosis between Ameloblastoma and Odontogenic Keratocyst using Computed Tomography”. doi:10.11242/dentalradiology1960.37.211.
    2. Egas-Bejar D, Huh WW (2014). “Rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients: current perspectives”. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 5: 115–25. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S44582. PMC 4069040. PMID 24966711.
    3. Dasgupta R, Fuchs J, Rodeberg D (2016). “Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Semin Pediatr Surg. 25 (5): 276–283. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.09.011. PMID 27955730.
    4. Park K, van Rijn R, McHugh K (2008). “The role of radiology in paediatric soft tissue sarcomas”. Cancer Imaging. 8: 102–15. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0014. PMC 2365455. PMID 18442956.
    5. Shern JF, Yohe ME, Khan J (2015). “Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Crit Rev Oncog. 20 (3–4): 227–43. PMC 5486973. PMID 26349418.
    6. Hartman DS, Sanders RC (April 1982). “Wilms’ tumor versus neuroblastoma: usefulness of ultrasound in differentiation”. J Ultrasound Med. 1 (3): 117–22. PMID 6152936.
    7. De Campo JF (1986). “Ultrasound of Wilms’ tumor”. Pediatr Radiol. 16 (1): 21–4. PMID 3003660.
    8. Cahan LD (1985). “Failure of encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis procedure in moyamoya disease”. Pediatr Neurosci. 12 (1): 58–62. PMID 4080660.
    9. Coppes MJ, Pritchard-Jones K (2000). “Principles of Wilms’ tumor biology”. Urol Clin North Am. 27 (3): 423–33, viii. PMID 10985142.
    10. Davidoff AM (2012). “Wilms tumor”. Adv Pediatr. 59 (1): 247–67. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.001. PMC 3589819. PMID 22789581.
    11. Burchill SA (2003). “Ewing’s sarcoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of molecular abnormalities”. J Clin Pathol. 56 (2): 96–102. PMC 1769883. PMID 12560386.
    12. Maygarden SJ, Askin FB, Siegal GP, Gilula LA, Schoppe J, Foulkes M; et al. (1993). “Ewing sarcoma of bone in infants and toddlers. A clinicopathologic report from the Intergroup Ewing’s Study”. Cancer. 71 (6): 2109–18. PMID 8443760.
    13. Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG; et al. (1997). “CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group”. Radiology. 202 (1): 237–46. doi:10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217. PMID 8988217.
    14. Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D, Tomazou EM, de Álava E, Kovar H; et al. (2018). “Ewing sarcoma”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 4 (1): 5. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x. PMID 29977059.
    15. Lonergan GJ, Schwab CM, Suarez ES, Carlson CL (2002). “Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 22 (4): 911–34. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl15911. PMID 12110723.
    16. Golden CB, Feusner JH (2002). “Malignant abdominal masses in children: quick guide to evaluation and diagnosis”. Pediatr Clin North Am. 49 (6): 1369–92, viii. PMID 12580370.
    17. Angstman KB, Miser JS, Franz WB (1990). “Neuroblastoma”. Am Fam Physician. 41 (1): 238–44. PMID 2403727.
    18. Musarella MA, Chan HS, DeBoer G, Gallie BL (1984). “Ocular involvement in neuroblastoma: prognostic implications”. Ophthalmology. 91 (8): 936–40. PMID 6493702.
    19. Leung K, Stamm M, Raja A, Low G (2013). “Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 200 (2): 370–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9126. PMID 23345359.
    20. Stein PP, Black HR (1991). “A simplified diagnostic approach to pheochromocytoma. A review of the literature and report of one institution’s experience”. Medicine (Baltimore). 70 (1): 46–66. PMID 1988766.
    21. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
    22. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
    23. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B (1995). “Bone cancers”. Cancer. 75 (1 Suppl): 203–10. PMID 8000997.
    24. Yarmish G, Klein MJ, Landa J, Lefkowitz RA, Hwang S (2010). “Imaging characteristics of primary osteosarcoma: nonconventional subtypes”. Radiographics. 30 (6): 1653–72. doi:10.1148/rg.306105524. PMID 21071381.
    25. Araki N, Uchida A, Kimura T, Yoshikawa H, Aoki Y, Ueda T; et al. (1991). “Involvement of the retinoblastoma gene in primary osteosarcomas and other bone and soft-tissue tumors”. Clin Orthop Relat Res (270): 271–7. PMID 1884549.
    26. Shmookler BM, Enzinger FM (1983). “Liposarcoma occurring in children. An analysis of 17 cases and review of the literature”. Cancer. 52 (3): 567–74. PMID 6861094.
    27. Marcus KC, Grier HE, Shamberger RC, Gebhardt MC, Perez-Atayde A, Silver B; et al. (1997). “Childhood soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience”. J Pediatr. 131 (4): 603–7. PMID 9386667.
    28. Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J (2005). “From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 25 (5): 1371–95. doi:10.1148/rg.255055106. PMID 16160117.
    29. Italiano A, Cardot N, Dupré F, Monticelli I, Keslair F, Piche M; et al. (2007). “Gains and complex rearrangements of the 12q13-15 chromosomal region in ordinary lipomas: the “missing link” between lipomas and liposarcomas?”. Int J Cancer. 121 (2): 308–15. doi:10.1002/ijc.22685. PMID 17372913.
    30. Yamamoto JF, Goodman MT (2008). “Patterns of leukemia incidence in the United States by subtype and demographic characteristics, 1997-2002”. Cancer Causes Control. 19 (4): 379–90. doi:10.1007/s10552-007-9097-2. PMID 18064533.
    31. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ; et al. (2013). “Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia”. N Engl J Med. 368 (22): 2059–74. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301689. PMC 3767041. PMID 23634996.
    32. Islam A, Catovsky D, Goldman JM, Galton DA (1985). “Bone marrow biopsy changes in acute myeloid leukaemia. I: Observations before chemotherapy”. Histopathology. 9 (9): 939–57. PMID 3864727.
    33. Orazi A (2007). “Histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases”. Pathobiology. 74 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1159/000101709. PMID 17587881.
    34. Zuckerman T, Rowe JM (2014). “Pathogenesis and prognostication in acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. F1000Prime Rep. 6: 59. doi:10.12703/P6-59. PMC 4108947. PMID 25184049.
    35. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT (2008). “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia”. Lancet. 371 (9617): 1030–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2. PMID 18358930.
    36. Green MR, Gentles AJ, Nair RV, Irish JM, Kihira S, Liu CL; et al. (2013). “Hierarchy in somatic mutations arising during genomic evolution and progression of follicular lymphoma”. Blood. 121 (9): 1604–11. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-09-457283. PMC 3587323. PMID 23297126.
    37. Sandlund JT (2015). “Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children”. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 10 (3): 237–43. doi:10.1007/s11899-015-0277-y. PMID 26174528.
    38. El-Galaly TC, Hutchings M (2015). “Imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphomas: diagnosis and response-adapted strategies”. Cancer Treat Res. 165: 125–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_5. PMID 25655608.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Risk Factors

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]

    Overview

    There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma. It is thought that common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma may be dentigerous cyst, impacted teeth, injury to the mouth or jaw, infections of the teeth or gums, inflammation of the teeth or gums, infections by viruses, and lack of protein or minerals in the person’s diet, and Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.

    Risk Factors

    There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma.

    Common Risk Factors

    Less Common Risk Factors

    Less common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma include:

    References

    1. Kreppel, M; Zöller, J (2018). “Ameloblastoma-Clinical, radiological, and therapeutic findings”. Oral Diseases. 24 (1–2): 63–66. doi:10.1111/odi.12702. ISSN 1354-523X.
    2. Laborde, A.; Nicot, R.; Wojcik, T.; Ferri, J.; Raoul, G. (2017). “Ameloblastoma of the jaws: Management and recurrence rate”. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 134 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.004. ISSN 1879-7296.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

    Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2], Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

    Overview

    In several cases, the patients with ameloblastoma are asymptomatic. Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.

    Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

    Natural History

    • Ameloblastoma is regarded as a true neoplasm of enamel.
    • Ameloblastoma described as unicentric, nonfunctional, intermittent in growth.
    • Ameloblastoma is the second most common odontogenic neoplasm.
    • Ameloblastoma histologically classified as six subtypes:
      • Follicular subtype
      • Plexiform subtype
      • Acanthomatous subtype
      • Granular subtype
      • Desmoplastic subtype and
      • Basilar subtype.

    Complications

    Prognosis

    • The prognosis of ameloblastoma was determined mainly by the method of surgical treatment, which means that patients receiving a radical treatment had a better prognosis than those who received a radical one. [6][7]

    References

    1. Gümgüm S, Hoşgören B (2005). “Clinical and radiologic behaviour of ameloblastoma in 4 cases”. J Can Dent Assoc. 71 (7): 481–4. PMID 16026635.
    2. Morgan, Peter R. (2011). “Odontogenic tumors: a review”. Periodontology 2000. 57 (1): 160–76. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00393.x. ISSN 0906-6713.
    3. Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
    4. Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
    5. Mukhopadhyay S, Raha K, Mondal SC (July 2005). “Huge ameloblastoma of jaw-A case report”. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 57 (3): 247–8. doi:10.1007/BF03008023. PMC 3451340. PMID 23120181.
    6. Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
    7. Mukhopadhyay S, Raha K, Mondal SC (July 2005). “Huge ameloblastoma of jaw-A case report”. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 57 (3): 247–8. doi:10.1007/BF03008023. PMC 3451340. PMID 23120181.
    8. Li, Yi; Han, Bo; Li, Long-Jiang (2012). “Prognostic and proliferative evaluation of ameloblastoma based on radiographic boundary”. International Journal of Oral Science. 4 (1): 30–33. doi:10.1038/ijos.2012.8. ISSN 1674-2818.

    Template:WH Template:WS

    Diagnosis

    Diagnosis

    Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

    Treatment

    Treatment

    Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

    Case Studies

    Case Studies

    Case #1


    Template:Oral pathology



    Template:WikiDoc Sources

    Looking for the patient version?

    Back to the patient-friendly article

    © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH