Ameloblastoma
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]
Synonyms and keywords: adamantinoma of the jaw; mandibular ameloblastoma; maxillary ameloblastoma; odontogenic tumor
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]
Overview
Ameloblastoma is a rare, benign tumor of odontogenic epithelium much more commonly appearing in the mandible than the maxilla. While these tumors are rarely malignant or metastatic (that is, they rarely spread to other parts of the body), and progress slowly, the resulting lesions can cause severe abnormalities of the face and jaw. Odontogenic tumors comprise of a complex group of lesions of diverse histopathological types and clinical behavior. Of all swellings of the oral cavity, 9% are odontogenic tumors and within this group, ameloblastoma accounts for 1% of lesions. WHO defines it as a locally invasive polymorphic neoplasia that often has a follicular or plexiform pattern in a fibrous stroma. Its behavior has been described as being benign but locally aggressive. In 20% of all cases the tumor can be found in the `maxilla, predominantly in the canine or molar region. Within the mandible, 70% are located in the molar region or the ascending ramus, 20% in the premolar region and 10% in the anterior part. Ameloblastoma was first described in 1868 by Broca. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be classified into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the clinicoradiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups: solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, mulitcystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastomas. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E. There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastomas. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E. The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years: the median age at diagnosis is 39 years. The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years: the median age at diagnosis is 39 years. Symptoms of ameloblastoma include mouth sores, painless swelling, loose teeth, facial deformity, swelling and numbness of the jaw, pain surrounding the teeth or jaw, and pain associated with the tissue growth, if ameloblastoma spreads to the sinus cavities and floor of the nose. The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.
Historical Perspective
Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca. This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.
Classification
Ameloblastoma may be classified based on histopathology into six subtypes including follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, basal cell, granular cell, and desmoplastic. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be divided into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the radiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups including solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant.
Pathophysiology
Ameloblastoma arise from remnants of ameloblast or dental lamina, dentigerous cysts, or basal layer of oral mucosa. There is evidence that suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, multicystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E
Causes
There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma may be the result of either decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 which helps in inhibition of the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or it is may be due to increased expression of α5β1 integrin which participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma.
Differential Diagnosis
Ameloblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause symptoms similar to those of ameloblastoma, such as dentigerous cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, odontogenic myxoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, hard odontoma, osteosarcoma, and globulomaxillary cysts
Epidemiology and Demographics
The incidence of ameloblastoma is approximately 1.96, 1.20, 0.18, and 0.44 per 100,000 for black males, black females, white males, and white females respectively, worldwide. Ameloblastoma affects men and women equally. There is no racial predilection to the ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma usually occur in middle age group i.e. 20-40 years; the median age at diagnosis is 39 years
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma. It is thought that common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma may be dentigerous cyst, impacted teeth, injury to the mouth or jaw, infections of the teeth or gums, inflammation of the teeth or gums, infections by viruses, and lack of protein or minerals in the person’s diet, and Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.
Screening
According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for ameloblastoma is not recommended.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
In several cases, the patients with ameloblastoma are asymptomatic. Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.
History and Symptoms
Symptoms of ameloblastoma include mouth sores, painless swelling, loose teeth, facial deformity, swelling and numbness of the jaw, pain surrounding the teeth or jaw, and pain associated with the tissue growth, if ameloblastoma spreads to the sinus cavities and floor of the nasal cavity.
Physical Examination
Patients with ameloblastoma usually appear normal and clinical presentation of an ameloblastoma is usually limited. Common physical examination findings of ameloblastoma include facial asymmetry, swelling, and hemorrhage.
Laboratory Findings
There are no diagnostic lab findings associated with ameloblastoma.
Electrocardiogram
There are no ECG findings associated with amelobastoma.
Head X Ray
A head x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of ameloblastoma include polycystic, honeycombed mass arising within the alveolar border of the jaw.
CT
Head CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on CT scan suggestive of ameloblastoma include multiloculated, soap-bubble” lesion, erosion of the adjacent tooth roots and well demarcated borders with no matrix calcification.
MRI
Head and neck MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on MRI diagnostic of ameloblastoma include mixed solid and cystic pattern, thick irregular walls with papillary solid structures projecting into the lesion.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Findings on an ultrasound suggestive of ameloblastoma include cystic mass with solid contents, flow signals, multilocular and honeycomb appearance.
Other Imaging Findings
There are no other imaging findings findings associated with acoustic neuroma.
Other Diagnostic Studies
Other diagnostic studies for ameloblastoma include incisional biopsy. Incisional biopsy is diagnostic of ameloblastoma.
Medical Therapy
The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.
Surgery
The mainstay of therapy for ameloblastoma is surgery. The predominant therapy for ameloblastoma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy/radiation/chemoradiation may be required.
Primary Prevention
There are no primary preventive measures available for ameloblastoma.
Secondary Prevention
Secondary prevention strategies following ameloblastoma include follow-up examination at regular intervals for at least 10 years.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]
Overview
Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca. This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.
Historical Perspective
Discovery
- Ameloblastoma was recognized in 1827 by Cusack.[1][2]
- Ameloblastoma was first described by Broca in 1868 and has been called adamantinoma, adamantoblastoma, epithelial odontoma, and a multilocular cyst.
- Ameloblastoma originates from the early English word ‘amel’, meaning enamel and the Greek word ‘blastos’, meaning germ.
- This type of odontogenic neoplasm was designated as an adamantinoma in 1885 by the French physician Louis-Charles Malassez.
- This tumor was previously called adamantinoma. However, this term is considered inaccurate now and is not used.
- It was finally renamed to the modern name ameloblastoma in 1930 by Ivey and Churchill.
References
- ↑ Goldwyn, Robert; Constable, John; Murray, Joseph E. (1963). “Ameloblastoma of the Jaw”. New England Journal of Medicine. 269 (3): 126–129. doi:10.1056/NEJM196307182690303. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ Pandya NJ, Stuteville OH (1972). “Treatment of ameloblastoma”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 50 (3): 242–8. PMID 4115148.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]
Overview
Ameloblastoma may be classified based on histopathology into six subtypes including follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, basal cell, granular cell, and desmoplastic. Based on the location, ameloblastoma may be divided into either intra-osseous or extra-osseous. Based on the radiologic features, ameloblastoma may be classified into four groups including solid or multicystic, unicystic, peripheral, and malignant.
Classification
Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the location:[1][2][3][4][5]
- Intraosseous
- Intraosseous ameloblastoma is locally aggressive
- Intraosseous ameloblastoma may include the histological subtypes such as follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, unicystic, granular cell, basal cell, or desmoplastic
- Extra-osseous
- Extraosseous ameloblastoma may include the histological subtypes such as follicular, plexiform, or basal cell
- Extraosseous ameloblastoma is benign
- Extraosseous ameloblastoma is also known as peripheral ameloblastoma
Based on radiology, intraosseous ameloblastoma may be subclassified into two groups which includes the following:
- Solid/multicystic
- More commonly reoccur
- Unicystic
- Unlikely to reoccur
- Classically found in younger individuals
Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the clinicoradiologic into four groups:[6][1][2][3][4][7]
- Solid or multicystic
- Solid ameloblastoma is the most common form of the lesion.
- Approximately 86% of the ameloblastoma are solid. It has a tendency to be more aggressive than the other types and has a higher incidence of recurrence.
- Multicystic ameloblastomacan infiltrate into the adjacent tissue and may metastasize and has the ability to recur.
- It is prevalent in a slightly older age group than the unicystic ameloblastoma.
- Radiographically, the appearance is generally multilocular or unilocular.
- Unicystic
- Unicystic ameloblastoma has a large cystic cavity with intraluminal, luminal, or mural proliferation of ameloblastic cells.
- Unicystic ameloblastoma is a less aggressive variant and it has a low rate of recurrence although lesions showing mural invasion are an exception and should be treated more aggressively.
- The unicystic ameloblastoma usually appears as a “cystic” lesion with either an intramural or an intraluminal proliferation of the cystic lining.
- Radiographically, it can resemble a well-circumscribed slow-growing radiolucency.[7]
- Peripheral
- Histologically, the peripheral ameloblastoma appears similar to the solid ameloblastoma.
- Peripheral ameloblastoma is uncommon, usually presenting as a painless, non-ulcerated sessile or pedunculated gingival lesion on the alveolar ridge.
- Peripheral ameloblastoma mostly appears in the alveolar mucosa. It is a soft-tissue version of an ameloblastoma but may also involve the underlying bone.
- Malignant
- The malignant ameloblastoma is a rare entity. It is defined as an ameloblastoma that has already metastasized but still maintains its classical microscopic features.
- The WHO classification of odontogenic tumors (2005) defines malignant ameloblastoma as, “an ameloblastoma that metastasizes in spite of a benign histological appearance”.
- Even if metastasis is absent, ameloblastoma with cytological atypia is defined as ameloblastic carcinoma.
- Thus, malignant ameloblastoma is defined as a retrospective diagnosis that can only be made when metastasis occurs.
- In majority of cases, it not only maintains the histological characteristics of the parent tumor but also continues to display similarly indolent clinical behavior.
Differentiating features of three different subtypes of ameloblastoma is shown below in a tabular form:
| Subtypes of Ameloblastoma | Percentage of Ameloblastoma | Age | Sites affected | Additional features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameloblastoma may be classified into following subtypes based on the histology:[8]
- Follicular
- Plexiform
- Acanthomatous
- Granular cell
- Basal cell
- Desmoplastic
| Subtypes of Ameloblastoma | Features |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Singh M, Shah A, Bhattacharya A, Raman R, Ranganatha N, Prakash P (2014). “Treatment algorithm for ameloblastoma”. Case Rep Dent. 2014: 121032. doi:10.1155/2014/121032. PMC 4274852. PMID 25548685.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Gümgüm S, Hoşgören B (2005). “Clinical and radiologic behaviour of ameloblastoma in 4 cases”. J Can Dent Assoc. 71 (7): 481–4. PMID 16026635.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Toledo-Pereyra LH, Bergren CT (1987). “Liver preservation techniques for transplantation”. Artif Organs. 11 (3): 214–23. PMID 3304226.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Poser CM (1973). “Demyelination in the central nervous system in chronic alcoholism: central pontine myelinolysis and Marchiafava-Bignami’s disease”. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 215: 373–81. PMID 4513681.
- ↑ Ameloblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
- ↑ Laborde, A.; Nicot, R.; Wojcik, T.; Ferri, J.; Raoul, G. (2017). “Ameloblastoma of the jaws: Management and recurrence rate”. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 134 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.004. ISSN 1879-7296.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Ameloblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
- ↑ Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivali Marketkar, M.B.B.S. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]
Overview
Ameloblastoma arise from remnants of ameloblast or dental lamina, dentigerous cysts, or basal layer of oral mucosa. There is evidence that suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. On gross pathology, the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma may include solid and cystic, multicystic and intraosseous or extraosseous, or rarely unicystic. On microscopic histopathological analysis, stellate reticulum, giant cells, subepithelial hyalinization, and columnar basal cells in palisading arrangement with vacuolated cytoplasm are characteristic findings of ameloblastoma. The exact pathophysiology of ameloblastoma is not fully understood. It is thought that ameloblastoma is the result of either suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 that may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or there is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include BRAF V600E.
Pathophysiology
Pathogenesis
- Ameloblastoma arise from remnants of ameloblast or dental lamina, dentigerous cysts, or basal layer of oral mucosa.[1][2][3][4][5]
- Ameloblasts, which are part of the odontogenic epithelium, are responsible for enamel production and eventual crown formation.
- There is evidence that suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 may inhibit the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, however, this was only demonstrated in vitro.
- There is also some research suggesting that α5β1 integrin may participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastomas.
- The ameloblastoma is an ectodermal odontogenic tumor of the jaw which apparently originates from the Malassez rests in the periodontium, from the gingival epithelium, from the enamel organs, or from ordinary dental cysts (dentigerous cysts, follicular cysts, or radicular cysts).
Genetics
Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma include:
Gross Pathology
On gross pathology the following are the characteristic findings of ameloblastoma:[7][8][9]
- Solid and cystic
- Multicystic and intraosseous or extraosseous
- Rarely may be unicystic
Microscopic Pathology
On microscopic examination, the following characteristic findings of ameloblastoma are present:
- Stellate reticulum – star-shaped cells, found in a developing tooth[10][11]
- Giant cells may or may not be present
- Subepithelial hyalinization may or may not be present
- Seen deep to the basement membrane
- Suprabasal cells loosely textured and noncohesive, resembling stellate reticulum
- The plexiform type has epithelium that proliferates in a “Fish Net Pattern”
- The follicular type will have outer arrangement of columnar or palisaded ameloblast like cells and inner zone of triangular shaped cells resembling stellate reticulum in bell stage. The central cells sometimes degenerate to form central microcysts
- No enamel or dentin formation
- Tall columnar cells
- Palisaded nuclei with reverse polarization
- Reverse polarization of nuclei = nuclei distant from the basement membrane/nuclei at pole opposite of basement membrane
- Palisaded nuclei = picket fence appearance; columnar-shaped nuclei with long axis perpendicular to the basement membrane (key feature)
- Subnuclear vacuolation
- Palisaded nuclei with reverse polarization
- The following are the different histopathological variants of ameloblastoma:[2][1]
- Intraosseous (follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, multicystic, unicystic, granular cell [lysosomes by EM], basal cell, desmoplastic)
- Extraosseous (follicular, plexiform, basal cell)
The image shows the characteristic features:[12]
- Islands of cells with palisaded nuclei that have reverse polarization.
- Reverse polarization of nuclei : nuclei distant from the basement membrane/nuclei at pole opposite of basement membrane
- Palisaded nuclei: picket fence appearance; columnar-shaped nuclei with long axis perpendicular to the basement membrane
- Subnuclear vacuolation in palisading cell – vacuoles at the basement membrane aspect
- Loose stroma around the islands of cells
- Star-like cells at the centre of the islands of cells (stellate reticulum)
Video
{{#ev:youtube|VW5aSalmyF0}}
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Ameloblastoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ameloblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Ameloblastoma Accessed on December 25, 2015
- ↑ Pandya NJ, Stuteville OH (1972). “Treatment of ameloblastoma”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 50 (3): 242–8. PMID 4115148.
- ↑ Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.
- ↑ Brazis PW, Miller NR, Lee AG, Holliday MJ (1995). “Neuro-ophthalmologic Aspects of Ameloblastoma”. Skull Base Surg. 5 (4): 233–44. PMC 1656531. PMID 17170964.
- ↑ McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
- ↑ Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Fernandes R, Malyapa RS, Mendenhall NP (December 2007). “Ameloblastoma”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 30 (6): 645–8. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e3181573e59. PMID 18091060.
- ↑ Dunfee BL, Sakai O, Pistey R, Gohel A (2006). “Radiologic and pathologic characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of the mandible”. Radiographics. 26 (6): 1751–68. doi:10.1148/rg.266055189. PMID 17102048.
- ↑ McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
- ↑ Gardner DG, Corio RL (April 1984). “Plexiform unicystic ameloblastoma. A variant of ameloblastoma with a low-recurrence rate after enucleation”. Cancer. 53 (8): 1730–5. PMID 6697311.
- ↑ McClary, Andrew C.; West, Robert B.; McClary, Ashley C.; Pollack, Jonathan R.; Fischbein, Nancy J.; Holsinger, Christopher F.; Sunwoo, John; Colevas, A. Dimitrios; Sirjani, Davud (2015). “Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273 (7): 1649–1661. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8. ISSN 0937-4477.
- ↑ Gruica B, Stauffer E, Buser D, Bornstein M. (2003). “Ameloblastoma of the follicular, plexiform, and acanthomatous type in the maxillary sinus: a case report”. Quintessence International. 34 (4): 311–4. PMID 12731620. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2], Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]
Overview
There are no established causes for ameloblastoma. It is thought that ameloblastoma may be the result of either decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 which helps in inhibition of the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma, or it is may be due to increased expression of α5β1 integrin which participate in the local invasiveness of ameloblastoma.
Causes
Common Causes
Common causes of ameloblastoma may include:[1][2]
- Decreased expression of of matrix metalloproteinase-2
- Increased expression α5β1 integrin
Less Common Causes
Less common causes of ameloblastoma may include:[2]
- Mouth or jaw injury
- Infections
- Inflammation
- Diet lacks in protein or minerals
Genetic Causes
References
- ↑ Jeddy, Nadeem; Jeeva, Sathiya; Jeyapradha, T; Lakshmipathy, P; Saikrishna, P; Ananthalakshmi, R (2013). “The molecular and genetic aspects in the pathogenesis and treatment of ameloblastoma”. Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences. 2 (3): 157. doi:10.4103/2277-8632.117179. ISSN 2277-8632.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Masthan KM, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S (April 2015). “Ameloblastoma”. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 7 (Suppl 1): S167–70. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.155891. PMC 4439660. PMID 26015700.
- ↑ Brown NA, Rolland D, McHugh JB, Weigelin HC, Zhao L, Lim MS, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Betz BL (November 2014). “Activating FGFR2-RAS-BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma”. Clin. Cancer Res. 20 (21): 5517–26. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1069. PMID 24993163.
- ↑ Kurppa KJ, Catón J, Morgan PR, Ristimäki A, Ruhin B, Kellokoski J, Elenius K, Heikinheimo K (April 2014). “High frequency of BRAF V600E mutations in ameloblastoma”. J. Pathol. 232 (5): 492–8. doi:10.1002/path.4317. PMC 4255689. PMID 24374844.
Differentiating Ameloblastoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]
Overview
Ameloblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause symptoms similar to those of ameloblastoma, such as dentigerous cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, odontogenic myxoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, hard odontoma, osteosarcoma, and globulomaxillary cysts.
Differential Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma include the following:[1]
- Dentigerous cyst
- Odontogenic keratocyst
- Odontogenic myxoma
- Aneurysmal bone cyst
- Fibrous dysplasia
- Hard odontoma
- Osteosarcoma
- Globulomaxillary cysts
Osteosarcoma must be differentiated from:Osteomyelitis, Pediatric Osteomyelitis, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, Metastases from other malignancies, Fibrous dysplasia, Giant cell tumors, Ewing’s sarcoma, Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, Lymphoma Osteoblastoma, Aneurysmal bone cyst, Fibrosarcoma and Cortical desmoid.
| Disease | History/demography | Symptoms | Physical examination | Diagnosis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palpable mass | Pain | Others | Mass tenderness | Others | Genetics | Imaging | Histology | |||
| Rhabdomyosarcoma[2][3][4][5] |
|
+ | + |
|
+/- |
|
Mutations in: |
CT scan:
MRI:
|
| |
| Wilms tumor[6][7][8][9][10] |
|
+ | + |
|
+/- | Present mutations of: | Ultrasound:
|
| ||
| Ewing sarcoma[11][12][13][14] |
|
+ | + | + |
|
Radiographic of region:
MRI:
|
| |||
| Pediatric neuroblastoma [15][16][17][18] |
Age distribution:
|
+ (Abdominal) |
+ |
+(Abdominal) |
CT scan:
MRI:
|
| ||||
| Pediatric pheochromocytoma[19][20][21][22] |
|
– | +/- | – | Genetic mutation in: | Ultrasound:
|
Positive stains for:
| |||
| Pediatric osteosarcoma[23][24][25] |
|
+ | + | + |
|
|
Radiography:
MRI: |
| ||
| Pediatric liposarcoma[26][27][28][29] |
|
+ | +/- | – |
|
|
CT scan:
MRI: |
Divided into following subtypes:
Common findings:
| ||
| Pediatric acute myelocytic leukemia[30][31][32][33] |
|
+/- ( Abdominal mass, mediastinal mass) | + (bone pain, joint pain) | +/- | Genetic translocations include:
|
Radiography:
|
| |||
| Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia[34][35] |
|
+/- (Musculoskeletal pain) | – | Chromosomal translocations:
|
Radiography:
|
Divided into 3 subgroups:
L1:
L2:
L3:
| ||||
| Pediatric non-hodgkin lymphoma[36][37][38] |
|
+ | – | + (Chest tenderness) | Radiography:
|
Histology findings of non-hodgkin lymphoma depend on: | ||||
References
- ↑ “Differential Diagnosis between Ameloblastoma and Odontogenic Keratocyst using Computed Tomography”. doi:10.11242/dentalradiology1960.37.211.
- ↑ Egas-Bejar D, Huh WW (2014). “Rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients: current perspectives”. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 5: 115–25. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S44582. PMC 4069040. PMID 24966711.
- ↑ Dasgupta R, Fuchs J, Rodeberg D (2016). “Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Semin Pediatr Surg. 25 (5): 276–283. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.09.011. PMID 27955730.
- ↑ Park K, van Rijn R, McHugh K (2008). “The role of radiology in paediatric soft tissue sarcomas”. Cancer Imaging. 8: 102–15. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0014. PMC 2365455. PMID 18442956.
- ↑ Shern JF, Yohe ME, Khan J (2015). “Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Crit Rev Oncog. 20 (3–4): 227–43. PMC 5486973. PMID 26349418.
- ↑ Hartman DS, Sanders RC (April 1982). “Wilms’ tumor versus neuroblastoma: usefulness of ultrasound in differentiation”. J Ultrasound Med. 1 (3): 117–22. PMID 6152936.
- ↑ De Campo JF (1986). “Ultrasound of Wilms’ tumor”. Pediatr Radiol. 16 (1): 21–4. PMID 3003660.
- ↑ Cahan LD (1985). “Failure of encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis procedure in moyamoya disease”. Pediatr Neurosci. 12 (1): 58–62. PMID 4080660.
- ↑ Coppes MJ, Pritchard-Jones K (2000). “Principles of Wilms’ tumor biology”. Urol Clin North Am. 27 (3): 423–33, viii. PMID 10985142.
- ↑ Davidoff AM (2012). “Wilms tumor”. Adv Pediatr. 59 (1): 247–67. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.001. PMC 3589819. PMID 22789581.
- ↑ Burchill SA (2003). “Ewing’s sarcoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of molecular abnormalities”. J Clin Pathol. 56 (2): 96–102. PMC 1769883. PMID 12560386.
- ↑ Maygarden SJ, Askin FB, Siegal GP, Gilula LA, Schoppe J, Foulkes M; et al. (1993). “Ewing sarcoma of bone in infants and toddlers. A clinicopathologic report from the Intergroup Ewing’s Study”. Cancer. 71 (6): 2109–18. PMID 8443760.
- ↑ Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG; et al. (1997). “CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group”. Radiology. 202 (1): 237–46. doi:10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217. PMID 8988217.
- ↑ Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D, Tomazou EM, de Álava E, Kovar H; et al. (2018). “Ewing sarcoma”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 4 (1): 5. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x. PMID 29977059.
- ↑ Lonergan GJ, Schwab CM, Suarez ES, Carlson CL (2002). “Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 22 (4): 911–34. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl15911. PMID 12110723.
- ↑ Golden CB, Feusner JH (2002). “Malignant abdominal masses in children: quick guide to evaluation and diagnosis”. Pediatr Clin North Am. 49 (6): 1369–92, viii. PMID 12580370.
- ↑ Angstman KB, Miser JS, Franz WB (1990). “Neuroblastoma”. Am Fam Physician. 41 (1): 238–44. PMID 2403727.
- ↑ Musarella MA, Chan HS, DeBoer G, Gallie BL (1984). “Ocular involvement in neuroblastoma: prognostic implications”. Ophthalmology. 91 (8): 936–40. PMID 6493702.
- ↑ Leung K, Stamm M, Raja A, Low G (2013). “Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 200 (2): 370–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9126. PMID 23345359.
- ↑ Stein PP, Black HR (1991). “A simplified diagnostic approach to pheochromocytoma. A review of the literature and report of one institution’s experience”. Medicine (Baltimore). 70 (1): 46–66. PMID 1988766.
- ↑ Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
- ↑ Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
- ↑ Dorfman HD, Czerniak B (1995). “Bone cancers”. Cancer. 75 (1 Suppl): 203–10. PMID 8000997.
- ↑ Yarmish G, Klein MJ, Landa J, Lefkowitz RA, Hwang S (2010). “Imaging characteristics of primary osteosarcoma: nonconventional subtypes”. Radiographics. 30 (6): 1653–72. doi:10.1148/rg.306105524. PMID 21071381.
- ↑ Araki N, Uchida A, Kimura T, Yoshikawa H, Aoki Y, Ueda T; et al. (1991). “Involvement of the retinoblastoma gene in primary osteosarcomas and other bone and soft-tissue tumors”. Clin Orthop Relat Res (270): 271–7. PMID 1884549.
- ↑ Shmookler BM, Enzinger FM (1983). “Liposarcoma occurring in children. An analysis of 17 cases and review of the literature”. Cancer. 52 (3): 567–74. PMID 6861094.
- ↑ Marcus KC, Grier HE, Shamberger RC, Gebhardt MC, Perez-Atayde A, Silver B; et al. (1997). “Childhood soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience”. J Pediatr. 131 (4): 603–7. PMID 9386667.
- ↑ Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J (2005). “From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 25 (5): 1371–95. doi:10.1148/rg.255055106. PMID 16160117.
- ↑ Italiano A, Cardot N, Dupré F, Monticelli I, Keslair F, Piche M; et al. (2007). “Gains and complex rearrangements of the 12q13-15 chromosomal region in ordinary lipomas: the “missing link” between lipomas and liposarcomas?”. Int J Cancer. 121 (2): 308–15. doi:10.1002/ijc.22685. PMID 17372913.
- ↑ Yamamoto JF, Goodman MT (2008). “Patterns of leukemia incidence in the United States by subtype and demographic characteristics, 1997-2002”. Cancer Causes Control. 19 (4): 379–90. doi:10.1007/s10552-007-9097-2. PMID 18064533.
- ↑ Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ; et al. (2013). “Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia”. N Engl J Med. 368 (22): 2059–74. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301689. PMC 3767041. PMID 23634996.
- ↑ Islam A, Catovsky D, Goldman JM, Galton DA (1985). “Bone marrow biopsy changes in acute myeloid leukaemia. I: Observations before chemotherapy”. Histopathology. 9 (9): 939–57. PMID 3864727.
- ↑ Orazi A (2007). “Histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases”. Pathobiology. 74 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1159/000101709. PMID 17587881.
- ↑ Zuckerman T, Rowe JM (2014). “Pathogenesis and prognostication in acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. F1000Prime Rep. 6: 59. doi:10.12703/P6-59. PMC 4108947. PMID 25184049.
- ↑ Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT (2008). “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia”. Lancet. 371 (9617): 1030–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2. PMID 18358930.
- ↑ Green MR, Gentles AJ, Nair RV, Irish JM, Kihira S, Liu CL; et al. (2013). “Hierarchy in somatic mutations arising during genomic evolution and progression of follicular lymphoma”. Blood. 121 (9): 1604–11. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-09-457283. PMC 3587323. PMID 23297126.
- ↑ Sandlund JT (2015). “Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children”. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 10 (3): 237–43. doi:10.1007/s11899-015-0277-y. PMID 26174528.
- ↑ El-Galaly TC, Hutchings M (2015). “Imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphomas: diagnosis and response-adapted strategies”. Cancer Treat Res. 165: 125–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_5. PMID 25655608.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2], Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]
Overview
There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma. It is thought that common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma may be dentigerous cyst, impacted teeth, injury to the mouth or jaw, infections of the teeth or gums, inflammation of the teeth or gums, infections by viruses, and lack of protein or minerals in the person’s diet, and Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.
Risk Factors
There are no established risk factors for ameloblastoma.
Common Risk Factors
- The risk factors of ameloblastoma is not well understood.[1][2]
- Risk factors may include the following:
- Dentigerous cyst
- Impacted teeth
- Injury to the mouth or jaw
- Infections of the teeth or gums
- Inflammation of the teeth or gums
Less Common Risk Factors
Less common risk factors in the development of ameloblastoma include:
- Infections by viruses
- Lack of protein or minerals in the diet
References
- ↑ Kreppel, M; Zöller, J (2018). “Ameloblastoma-Clinical, radiological, and therapeutic findings”. Oral Diseases. 24 (1–2): 63–66. doi:10.1111/odi.12702. ISSN 1354-523X.
- ↑ Laborde, A.; Nicot, R.; Wojcik, T.; Ferri, J.; Raoul, G. (2017). “Ameloblastoma of the jaws: Management and recurrence rate”. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 134 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.004. ISSN 1879-7296.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2], Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]
Overview
In several cases, the patients with ameloblastoma are asymptomatic. Depending on the extent of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
- In several cases, the patients with ameloblastoma are asymptomatic.[1][2][3]
- Ameloblastoma most commonly diagnosed as an accidental finding on orthopantomography.
- The most common symptoms in patients with ameloblastoma are as following:
- Facial swelling
- Malocclusion
- Loosening of teeth
- ILL-fitting dentures
- Periodontal diseases
- Oroantral fistulas and
- Nasal airway obstruction
- Ameloblastoma is regarded as a true neoplasm of enamel.
- Ameloblastoma described as unicentric, nonfunctional, intermittent in growth.
- Ameloblastoma is the second most common odontogenic neoplasm.
- Ameloblastoma histologically classified as six subtypes:
- Follicular subtype
- Plexiform subtype
- Acanthomatous subtype
- Granular subtype
- Desmoplastic subtype and
- Basilar subtype.
- Ameloblastoma most commonly affects mandible more than maxilla.
- Ameloblastomal progress as a slow growing, painless expansion of jaw
Complications
- Complications of ameloblastoma include the following:[4][5]
- Breathing difficulty
- Pain and facial deformity
- Secondary infection of the tumor
- The recurrence rate of these tumors is 25-30%.
Prognosis
- The prognosis of ameloblastoma was determined mainly by the method of surgical treatment, which means that patients receiving a radical treatment had a better prognosis than those who received a radical one. [6][7]
- In more than 50% patients receiving the conservative treatment had good prognosis without any recurrence.
- Ameloblastoma which has a well-defined edge with sclerosis is thought to grow slowly, and the normal bone has a strong reaction to form the sclerosis edge, and the prognosis is good.
- Ameloblastomawith the ill-defined radiographic boundary, the tumor has the highest proliferative ability and poorest prognosis.
- Radical surgery should be used for the multicystic ameloblastoma to prevent the recurrence.
- The follicular ameloblastoma were thought to have a higher recurrence rate than unicystic or plexiform.[8]
References
- ↑ Gümgüm S, Hoşgören B (2005). “Clinical and radiologic behaviour of ameloblastoma in 4 cases”. J Can Dent Assoc. 71 (7): 481–4. PMID 16026635.
- ↑ Morgan, Peter R. (2011). “Odontogenic tumors: a review”. Periodontology 2000. 57 (1): 160–76. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00393.x. ISSN 0906-6713.
- ↑ Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
- ↑ Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
- ↑ Mukhopadhyay S, Raha K, Mondal SC (July 2005). “Huge ameloblastoma of jaw-A case report”. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 57 (3): 247–8. doi:10.1007/BF03008023. PMC 3451340. PMID 23120181.
- ↑ Ruslin, M; Hendra, FN; Vojdani, A; Hardjosantoso, D; Gazali, M; Tajrin, A; Wolff, J; Forouzanfar, T (2017). “The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study”. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal: 0–0. doi:10.4317/medoral.22185. ISSN 1698-6946.
- ↑ Mukhopadhyay S, Raha K, Mondal SC (July 2005). “Huge ameloblastoma of jaw-A case report”. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 57 (3): 247–8. doi:10.1007/BF03008023. PMC 3451340. PMID 23120181.
- ↑ Li, Yi; Han, Bo; Li, Long-Jiang (2012). “Prognostic and proliferative evaluation of ameloblastoma based on radiographic boundary”. International Journal of Oral Science. 4 (1): 30–33. doi:10.1038/ijos.2012.8. ISSN 1674-2818.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
