Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Retinoblastoma

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Retinoblastomas; RB; Rb

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3] Alberto Castro Molina, M.D.

Overview

Retinoblastoma is the abnormal overgrowth of the retina, the most inner layer of the eye. RB1 gene mutation is the common cause of this malignancy. This tumor affects mostly young children and may result in loss of the vision. Retinoblastoma was first described in 1809 by Dr. James Wardrop. Then, Dr. Flexner, in 1891, was the first to discover the rosette structure within the tumor. In 1953, Dr. Kupfer was the first ophthalmologist who tried a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of the tumor. There are several classification system available for retinoblastoma. As the treatment of the tumor has evolved, a new classification system has been introduced. For intraocular diseases the available grouping systems include the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC), Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and cTNMH systems. For extraocular diseases, the International Retinoblastoma Staging System (IRSS) and cTNMH schemes can be used. Retinoblastoma is a neoplasm which is caused by the inactivation of RB1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, located on the long arm of the chromosome 13. Mutation in both alleles of the RB1 gene is necessary for the inactivation of the gene. This disorder may occur in the familial or sporadic form. (Rb) gene product limits the cell progression from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. Loss of this active, functional protein (Rb) causes cell cycle dysregulation and subsequent overgrowth and tumor formation. Retinoblastoma may be caused by mutation in both allels of RB1 tumor suppressor gene or due to somatic amplification of the MYCN oncogene. Retinoblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause leukocoria. leukocoria may occur in several ocular conditions including tumors, vascular disease, inflammatory disorders, and also due to trauma.

Retinoblastoma is a highly curable childhood cancer when detected early and treated in centers with multidisciplinary expertise; however, survival varies globally and delays in diagnosis and access to care contribute to preventable death and vision loss in some regions.[1][2][3] Approximately 40% of patients have heritable disease due to a germline RB1 pathogenic variant (often associated with bilateral disease and increased risk of second primary malignancies), while most unilateral cases are nonheritable.[1][4]

The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States has been reported 1.2 cases per 100,000 child aged 4 years or younger. The median age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma is 18 months. The average age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma for children with unilateral disease and bilateral disease is 24 months and 12 months respectively. Retinoblastoma affects males and females equally. There is no racial predilection to the development of retinoblastoma. Risk factors associated with the development of retinoblastoma are mutation in RB1 gene, a positive family history of retinoblastoma, living in areas with high incidence rate of the disease, HPV viral exposure and other environmental factors. Early diagnosis of retinoblastoma is necessary to obtain the best outcomes for vision and eye salvage. In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and ophthalmic pathology and genetics suggest a risk-stratified schedule for ophthalmic screening examinations. Estimated risk of retinoblastoma development is calculated according to the relativity of individuals to the family member with retinoblastoma. If left untreated, retinoblastoma may progress to develop seeding in the eye, leading to retinal detachment, necrosis and invasion of the orbit, optic nerve invasion, and central nervous system invasion. The majority of untreated patients die of intracranial extension and disseminated disease within one year. Spontaneous regression of the tumor is a rare occurrence but may occur in a small number of cases.

Common complications of retinoblastoma include metastasis, tumor recurrence, trilateral retinoblastoma, and subsequent neoplasms. Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with retinoblastoma with treatment is approximately 95% in the United States. Ultrasound imaging is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of retinoblastoma. MRI can also be helpful in the diagnosis making. A common method of retinoblastoma classification is critical to plan treatment, evaluate prognosis and compare outcomes. Available grouping systems include the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC), Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and cTNMH systems diseases. The hallmark of retinoblastoma is leukocoria which is an abnormal appearance of the retina as viewed through the pupil, also known as amaurotic cat’s eye reflex. Other common symptoms include strabismus and proptosis. The clinical presentation depends on the stage of the disease. Patients with retinoblastoma usually appear normal. Physical examination of patients is usually remarkable for leukocoria, strabismus, and proptosis, particularly in advanced cases. Other findings in physical examination of retinoblastoma include anisocoria, orbital cellulitis, hyphema, heterochromia iridis, poor visual acuity, unilateral mydriasis, rubeosis iridis, vitreous hemorrhage, and findings of intrinsic calcification on fundoscopic examination. There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with retinoblastoma. There are no x-ray findings associated with retinoblastoma. On ultrasound imaging, retinoblastoma is characterized by echogenic soft-tissue masses with variable shadowing due to calcifications and heterogeneity due to necrosis and/or hemorrhage. CT scan has been the standard imaging study of retinoblastoma.

Retinoblastoma usually appears as an intra-ocular mass with calcification (in 80% of the cases). On head and neck MRI, retinoblastoma is characterized by hyperintense mass on T1-weighted MRI and hypointense mass on T2-weighted MRI. Optical coherence tomography may be helpful in the diagnosis of Retinoblastoma. Other diagnostic studies for retinoblastoma include fluorescein angiography and electroretinogram. The optimal therapy for retinoblastoma depends on the stage at diagnosis. Systemic chemotherapy via carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine (CEV) is the most common regimen used to treat retinoblastoma. There are different modalities of treatment available for retinoblastoma. The feasibility of each strategy depends on the stage of retinoblastoma at the time of diagnosis. There are no established measures for the primary prevention of retinoblastoma. There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of retinoblastoma.

Modern eye-salvage strategies emphasize focal consolidation therapies (laser, cryotherapy, thermotherapy), chemoreduction with systemic chemotherapy, and targeted delivery approaches including intra-arterial chemotherapy and intravitreal chemotherapy for vitreous seeds, with reduced use of external-beam radiotherapy because of long-term toxicity and second cancer risk in heritable disease.[5][6][7]

Historic Perspective

Retinoblastoma was first described in 1809 by Dr. James Wardrop. Then, Dr. Flexner, in 1891, was the first to discover the rosette structure within the tumor. In 1953, Dr. Kupfer was the first ophthalmologist who tried a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of the tumor.

Genetic and molecular milestones include the two-hit model of tumor suppressor inactivation and identification of the RB1 locus, which established retinoblastoma as a foundational cancer genetics paradigm.[4][8][9][10]

Classification

There are several classification system available for retinoblastoma. As the treatment of the tumor has evolved, a new classification system has been introduced. For intraocular diseases the available grouping systems include the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC), Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and cTNMH systems. For extraocular diseases, the International Retinoblastoma Staging System (IRSS) and cTNMH schemes can be used.

Consistent staging and grouping are essential to guide eye-salvage strategies, assess prognosis, and compare outcomes across centers, including contemporary approaches that incorporate vitreous and subretinal seeding and response to targeted chemotherapy delivery.[5][2][1]

Pathophysiology

Retinoblastoma is a neoplasm which is caused by the inactivation of RB1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, located on the long arm of the chromosome 13. Mutation in both alleles of the RB1 gene is necessary for the inactivation of the gene. This disorder may occur in the familial or sporadic form. (Rb) gene product limits the cell progression from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. Loss of this active, functional protein (Rb) causes cell cycle dysregulation and subsequent overgrowth and tumor formation.

Retinoblastoma is initiated by loss of RB1 function in a retinal precursor context, and multiple lines of evidence support cone-precursor lineage programs contributing to tumorigenesis in many cases.[11][12]

A subset of retinoblastomas arise without RB1 inactivation and are driven by somatic amplification of MYCN, with distinct clinical and imaging features; MRI-based patterns may help distinguish MYCN-amplified, RB1 wild-type tumors and inform management strategies.[13][14][1]

Causes

Retinoblastoma may be caused by mutation in both allels of RB1 tumor suppressor gene or due to somatic amplification of the MYCN oncogene.

Differentiating Retinoblastoma from Other Diseases

Retinoblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause leukocoria. leukocoria may occur in several ocular conditions including tumors, vascular disease, inflammatory disorders, and also due to trauma.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States has been reported 1.2 cases per 100,000 child aged 4 years or younger. The median age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma is 18 months. The average age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma for children with unilateral disease and bilateral disease is 24 months and 12 months respectively. Retinoblastoma affects males and females equally. There is no racial predilection to the development of retinoblastoma.

Population outcomes vary substantially by region, and global disparities in survival and eye salvage are driven by differences in access to early detection, specialized care, and supportive services.[1][3]

Risk factors

Risk factors associated with the development of retinoblastoma are mutation in RB1 gene, a positive family history of retinoblastoma, living in areas with high incidence rate of the disease, HPV viral exposure and other environmental factors.

Screening

Early diagnosis of retinoblastoma is necessary to obtain the best outcomes for vision and eye salvage. In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and ophthalmic pathology and genetics suggest a risk-stratified schedule for ophthalmic screening examinations. Estimated risk of retinoblastoma development is calculated according to the relativity of individuals to the family member with retinoblastoma.

Risk-stratified surveillance commonly incorporates genetic counseling and RB1 testing when available, with frequent ophthalmic examinations in early childhood for at-risk infants and children. In heritable disease, screening may also include MRI-based surveillance for intracranial tumors in selected contexts, balancing risk, feasibility, and local practice patterns.[15][1]

Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis

If left untreated, retinoblastoma may progress to develop seeding in the eye, leading to retinal detachment, necrosis and invasion of the orbit, optic nerve invasion, and central nervous system invasion. The majority of untreated patients die of intracranial extension and disseminated disease within one year. Spontaneous regression of the tumor is a rare occurrence but may occur in a small number of cases. Common complications of retinoblastoma include metastasis, tumor recurrence, trilateral retinoblastoma, and subsequent neoplasms. Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with retinoblastoma with treatment is approximately 95% in the United States.

Heritable retinoblastoma is associated with elevated lifetime risk of subsequent malignancies, and survivorship care commonly includes counseling on long-term surveillance and avoidance of unnecessary ionizing radiation when feasible.[1]

Daignosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Ultrasound imaging is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of retinoblastoma. MRI can also be helpful in the diagnosis making. A common method of retinoblastoma classification is critical to plan treatment, evaluate prognosis and compare outcomes. Available grouping systems include the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC), Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and cTNMH systems diseases.

In contemporary practice, diagnosis is typically based on examination under anesthesia with indirect ophthalmoscopy plus imaging (ultrasound and MRI). MRI is preferred for evaluating optic nerve involvement and intracranial extension, and to avoid ionizing radiation exposure associated with CT, particularly in children with heritable disease.[1]

History and Symptoms

The hallmark of retinoblastoma is leukocoria which is an abnormal appearance of the retina as viewed through the pupil, also known as amaurotic cat’s eye reflex. Other common symptoms include strabismus and proptosis. The clinical presentation depends on the stage of the disease.

Physical Examination

Patients with retinoblastoma usually appear normal. Physical examination of patients is usually remarkable for leukocoria, strabismus, and proptosis, particularly in advanced cases. Other findings on physical examination of retinoblastoma include anisocoria, orbital cellulitis, hyphema, heterochromia iridis, poor visual acuity, unilateral mydriasis, rubeosis iridis, vitreous hemorrhage, and findings of intrinsic calcification on fundoscopic examination.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with retinoblastoma.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with retinoblastoma.

X Ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with retinoblastoma.

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

On ultrasound imaging, retinoblastoma is characterized by echogenic soft-tissue masses with variable shadowing due to calcification and heterogeneity due to necrosis and/or hemorrhage.

CT scan

CT scan has been the standard imaging study of retinoblastoma. Retinoblastoma usually appears as an intra-ocular mass with calcification (in 80% of the cases).

MRI scan

MRI findings of retinoblastoma include hyperintense mass on T1-weighted MRI and hypointense mass on T2-weighted MRI.

Other Imaging Findings

Optical coherence tomography may be helpful in the diagnosis of Retinoblastoma.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies for retinoblastoma include fluorescein angiography and electroretinogram.

Molecular diagnostics are increasingly used to guide risk stratification and management, and include next-generation sequencing approaches in select settings and analysis of aqueous humor cell-free DNA as a tumor-derived liquid biopsy, which may be particularly useful because tumor biopsy is generally avoided in retinoblastoma.[16][17][18][19][20][21]

Treatment

Medical therapy

The optimal therapy for retinoblastoma depends on the stage at diagnosis. Systemic chemotherapy via carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine (CEV) is the most common regimen used to treat retinoblastoma.

Contemporary regimens integrate systemic chemotherapy with focal consolidation, and targeted delivery approaches (intra-arterial chemotherapy and intravitreal chemotherapy) to improve eye salvage while limiting systemic exposure in selected cases, especially for advanced intraocular disease with seeding.[5][6][7] Treatment-related adverse events and long-term sequelae are important considerations, including ototoxicity, myelosuppression, and secondary malignancy risk, and require multidisciplinary follow-up.[22]

For patients with extraocular disease, intensive multimodality therapy protocols have been studied, including contemporary cooperative group experience for newly diagnosed extraocular retinoblastoma.[23]

Surgery

There are different modalities of treatment available for retinoblastoma. The feasibility of each strategy depends on the stage of retinoblastoma at the time of diagnosis.

Pathology informs adjuvant therapy decisions after enucleation in advanced cases, and high-risk histopathologic features (including optic nerve invasion and massive choroidal invasion) are associated with metastatic risk and guide additional treatment in many protocols.[24]

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of retinoblastoma.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of retinoblastoma.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Cobrinik D (2024). “Retinoblastoma Origins and Destinations”. N Engl J Med. 390: 1408–1419. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1803083.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Munier FL, Beck-Popovic M, Chantada GL, et al. Conservative management of retinoblastoma: a model of care for “success with no comorbidity.” Prog Retin Eye Res 2019;73:100764.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Bowman R. Retinoblastoma: a curable, rare and deadly blinding disease. Community Eye Health 2018;31:1-4.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Knudson AG Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1971;68:820-823.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Fabian ID, Onadim Z, Karaa E, et al. The management of retinoblastoma. Oncogene 2018;37:1551-1560.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Schaiquevich P, Francis JH, Cancela MB, Carcaboso AM, Chantada GL, Abramson DH. Treatment of retinoblastoma: what is the latest and what is the future. Front Oncol 2022;12:822330.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Munier FL, Gaillard MC, Balmer A, et al. Intravitreal chemotherapy for vitreous disease in retinoblastoma revisited: from prohibition to conditional indications. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1078-1083.
  8. Friend SH, Bernards R, Rogelj S, et al. A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma. Nature 1986;323:643-646.
  9. Fung YK, Murphree AL, T’Ang A, Qian J, Hinrichs SH, Benedict WF. Structural evidence for the authenticity of the human retinoblastoma gene. Science 1987;236:1657-1661.
  10. Dunn JM, Phillips RA, Becker AJ, Gallie BL. Identification of germline and somatic mutations affecting the retinoblastoma gene. Science 1988;241:1797-1800.
  11. Xu XL, Singh HP, Wang L, et al. Rb suppresses human cone-precursor-derived retinoblastoma tumours. Nature 2014;514:385-388.
  12. McEvoy J, Flores-Otero J, Zhang J, et al. Coexpression of normally incompatible developmental pathways in retinoblastoma genesis. Cancer Cell 2011;20:260-275.
  13. Blixt MKE, Hellsand M, Konjusha D, et al. MYCN induces cell-specific tumorigenic growth in RB1-proficient human retinal organoid and chicken retina models of retinoblastoma. Oncogenesis 2022;11:34.
  14. Jansen RW, de Bloeme CM, Cardoen L, et al. MRI features of MYCN-amplified, RB1 wild-type retinoblastoma. Radiology 2023;307:e222264.
  15. Staffieri SE, McGillivray G, Elder JE, et al. Managing the risk of retinoblastoma: surveillance and the role of imaging in screening. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:174-178.
  16. Afshar AR, Pekmezci M, Bloomer MM, et al. Next-generation sequencing of retinoblastoma identifies pathogenic alterations beyond RB1 inactivation that correlate with aggressive histopathologic features. Ophthalmology 2020;127:804-813.
  17. Li H-T, Xu L, Weisenberger DJ, et al. Characterizing DNA methylation signatures of retinoblastoma using aqueous humor liquid biopsy. Nat Commun 2022;13:5523.
  18. Xu L, Shen L, Polski A, et al. Simultaneous identification of driver alterations and therapeutic targets from aqueous humor of retinoblastoma eyes. Ophthalmic Genet 2020;41:526-.
  19. Polski A, Xu L, Prabakar RK, et al. Cell-free DNA tumor fraction in aqueous humor is associated with disease burden in retinoblastoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:30.
  20. Abramson DH, Mandelker D, Francis JH, et al. Retrospective evaluation of cell-free DNA from blood in retinoblastoma. Ophthalmol Sci 2021;1:100015.
  21. Gerrish A, Jenkinson H, Cole T. The impact of cell-free DNA analysis on the management of retinoblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1570.
  22. Rizzuti AE, Dunkel IJ, Abramson DH. The adverse events of systemic chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: what are they? Do we know? Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:862-865.
  23. Dunkel IJ, Piao J, Chantada GL, et al. Intensive multimodality therapy for newly diagnosed extraocular retinoblastoma: a Children’s Oncology Group trial (ARET0321). J Clin Oncol 2022;40:3839-3847.
  24. Eagle RC Jr. High-risk features and tumor differentiation in retinoblastoma: a retrospective histopathologic study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1203-1209.
Historical Perspective


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

Retinoblastoma was first described in 1809 by Dr. James Wardrop. Then, Dr. Flexner, in 1891, was the first to discover the rosette structure within the tumor. In 1953, Dr. Kupfer was the first ophthalmologist who tried a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of the tumor.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1657, Dr. Petrus Pawius, an anatomist from Amsterdam, described a tumor resembling retinoblastoma for the first time.[1]
  • In 1767, Dr. Hayes, a surgeon, was first to describe the bilateral form of retinoblastoma.
  • In 1809, Dr. James Wardrop, a Scottish surgeon and ophthalmologist, first described the retinoblastoma tumor.
  • In 1971, Dr. Knudson proposed the two-hit hypothesis which gives the light to the pathogenesis of the familial and sporadic form of the tumor.[2]
  • In 1891, Dr. Flexner was the first to discover the rosette structure within the tumor.[1]
  • In the 1920s, Verhoeff claimed that the tumor arose from embryonic retinal cells and hence proposed the name “retinoblastoma”.
  • Retinoblastoma is the first cancer in which the role of genetics was discovered.[3]
  • In 1977, Dr. Jakobiec and colleagues were the first to describe the association between bilateral intraocular retinoblastoma and intracranial malignancy, also known as trilateral retinoblastoma.[4]

Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Albert, Daniel M. (1987). “Historic Review of Retinoblastoma”. Ophthalmology. 94 (6): 654–662. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(87)33407-4. ISSN 0161-6420.
  2. Knudson AG (April 1971). “Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68 (4): 820–3. PMC 389051. PMID 5279523.
  3. Dimaras H (March 2015). “Retinoblastoma genetics in India: From research to implementation”. Indian J Ophthalmol. 63 (3): 219–26. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.156917. PMC 4448234. PMID 25971166.
  4. Jakobiec FA, Tso MO, Zimmerman LE, Danis P (May 1977). “Retinoblastoma and intracranial malignancy”. Cancer. 39 (5): 2048–58. PMID 870165.

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

There are several classification systems available for retinoblastoma. As the treatment of the tumor has evolved, a new classification system has been introduced. For intraocular disease, the available grouping systems include International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC), Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB), and cTNMH systems. For extraocular disease, the International Retinoblastoma Staging System (IRSS) and cTNMH schemes can be used.

Classification

Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification System

Intraocular Classifications of Retinoblastoma and their Features

International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC) Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB)
Group A

(very low risk)

  • Tumors ≤ 3 mm (in basal dimension or thickness)
Group B

(low risk)

  • Tumors > 3 mm (in basal dimension or thickness) or
  • Macular location (≤ 3 mm to foveola)
  • Juxtapapillary location (≤ 1.5 mm to disc)
  • Additional subretinal fluid (≤3 mm from margin)
Group C

(moderate risk)

Group D

(high risk)

Group E

(very high risk)

Reese-Ellsworth Classification for Intraocular Tumors[5]

Reese-Ellsworth Classification[6]

Stage Sub-stage Features Prognosis
Group I
  • a
  • Solitory tumor < 6 mm at or behind the equator
  • Very favorable
  • b
  • Multiple tumors, none > 6 mm, all are at or behind the equator
  • Very favorable
Group II
  • a
  • Solitary tumor, 6 to 15 mm, all at or behind the equator
  • Favorable
  • b
  • Multiple tumors, 6 to 15 mm, behind the equator
  • Favorable
Group III
  • a
  • Undetermind
  • b
  • Solitary tumor larger than 15 mm, behind the equator
  • Undetermined
Group IV
  • a
  • Multiple tumors, some larger than 15 mm
  • Unfavorable
  • b
  • Unfavorable
Group V
  • a
  • Very unfavorable
  • b
  • Very unfavorable

Extra-ocular Retinoblastoma Classification System

    • This classification system includes the following:
      • International retinoblastoma staging system
      • cTNMH system of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)[7]

References

  1. Chantada GL, Sampor C, Bosaleh A, Solernou V, Fandiño A, de Dávila MT (September 2013). “Comparison of staging systems for extraocular retinoblastoma: analysis of 533 patients”. JAMA Ophthalmol. 131 (9): 1127–34. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.260. PMID 23787805.
  2. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, Czyz C, Leahey A, Meadows AT, Shields JA (December 2006). “The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success”. Ophthalmology. 113 (12): 2276–80. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.018. PMID 16996605.
  3. Zage PE, Reitman AJ, Seshadri R, Weinstein JL, Mets MB, Zeid JL, Greenwald MJ, Strauss LC, Goldman S (March 2008). “Outcomes of a two-drug chemotherapy regimen for intraocular retinoblastoma”. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 50 (3): 567–72. doi:10.1002/pbc.21301. PMID 17729249.
  4. Novetsky DE, Abramson DH, Kim JW, Dunkel IJ (March 2009). “Published international classification of retinoblastoma (ICRB) definitions contain inconsistencies–an analysis of impact”. Ophthalmic Genet. 30 (1): 40–4. doi:10.1080/13816810802452168. PMID 19172510.
  5. Linn Murphree A (March 2005). “Intraocular retinoblastoma: the case for a new group classification”. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 18 (1): 41–53, viii. doi:10.1016/j.ohc.2004.11.003. PMID 15763190.
  6. Murphree, A. Linn; Chantada, Guillermo L. (2015). “Retinoblastoma: Staging and Grouping”: 29–37. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_3.
  7. “TNM8: The updated TNM classification for retinoblastoma”. Community Eye Health. 31 (101): 34. 2018. PMC 5998398. PMID 29915471.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

Retinoblastoma is a neoplasm which is caused by the inactivation of RB1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, located on the long arm of the chromosome 13. Mutation in both alleles of the RB1 gene is necessary for the inactivation of the gene. This disorder may occur in the familial or sporadic form. (Rb) gene product limits the cell progression from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. Loss of this active, functional protein (Rb) causes cell cycle dysregulation and subsequent overgrowth and tumor formation.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Associated Conditions

Gross Pathology

These growth patterns are described in the table below:

Growth patterns Features
Endophytic
Exophytic
Mixed
  • Most common type
  • Mixed components of endophytic and exophytic are seen
Diffuse Infiltrative
Necrotic
Gross pathology of retinoblastoma, Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 9461


Microscopic Pathology

  • The most differentiated part is formed from a bouquet-like aggregates of cells called fleurettes, where mitoses or necrosis are not present.
  • The rosettes are composed of cells with varying degrees of differentiation.
  • There are two types of rosettes:
    • Flexner–Wintersteiner rosette: Composed of a ring of cells surrounding a clear center resembling the subretinal space.
    • Homer Wright rosette: Comprises of a rim of cells with a lumen filled by cytoplasmic prolongations of the tumor cells.
  • Retinoblastoma may be classified according to the degree of differentiation to well/poor-differentiated.
    • Well-differentiated tumor is > 50% Homer-Wright (HW) rosettes.
    • Poor-differentiated tumor is < 50% Flexner-Wintersteiner (FW) rosettes.

Immunohistochemistry

References

  1. Dunn JM, Phillips RA, Becker AJ, Gallie BL (September 1988). “Identification of germline and somatic mutations affecting the retinoblastoma gene”. Science. 241 (4874): 1797–800. PMID 3175621.
  2. Dunn JM, Phillips RA, Zhu X, Becker A, Gallie BL (November 1989). “Mutations in the RB1 gene and their effects on transcription”. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9 (11): 4596–604. PMC 363605. PMID 2601691.
  3. Garber JE, Offit K (January 2005). “Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes”. J. Clin. Oncol. 23 (2): 276–92. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.10.042. PMID 15637391.
  4. Goodrich, David W.; Wang, Nan Ping; Qian, Yue-Wei; Lee, Eva Y.-H.P.; Lee, Wen-Hwa (1991). “The retinoblastoma gene product regulates progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle”. Cell. 67 (2): 293–302. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90181-W. ISSN 0092-8674.
  5. Knudson AG (April 1971). “Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68 (4): 820–3. PMC 389051. PMID 5279523.
  6. Friend SH, Bernards R, Rogelj S, Weinberg RA, Rapaport JM, Albert DM, Dryja TP (1986). “A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma”. Nature. 323 (6089): 643–6. doi:10.1038/323643a0. PMID 2877398.
  7. Fabian ID, Rosser E, Sagoo MS (2018). “Epidemiological and genetic considerations in retinoblastoma”. Community Eye Health. 31 (101): 29–30. PMC 5998388. PMID 29915469.
  8. Clark, Robin D.; Avishay, Stefanie G. (2015). “Retinoblastoma: Genetic Counseling and Testing”: 77–88. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_8.
  9. Tse, Brian C.; Brennan, Rachel C.; Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos; Wilson, Matthew W. (2015). “Non-ocular Tumors”: 201–208. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_19.
  10. Das D, Bhattacharjee K, Barthakur SS, Tahiliani PS, Deka P, Bhattacharjee H, Deka A, Paul R (May 2014). “A new rosette in retinoblastoma”. Indian J Ophthalmol. 62 (5): 638–41. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.129786. PMC 4065523. PMID 24881618.
  11. Singh, Arun (2015). Clinical ophthalmic oncology : retinoblastoma. Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 978-3-662-43451-2.
  12. Kashyap S, Sethi S, Meel R, Pushker N, Sen S, Bajaj MS, Chandra M, Ghose S (February 2012). “A histopathologic analysis of eyes primarily enucleated for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma from a developing country”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 136 (2): 190–3. doi:10.5858/arpa.2010-0759-OA. PMID 22288967.
  13. Chévez-Barrios, Patricia; Eagle, Ralph C.; Marback, Eduardo F. (2015). “Histopathologic Features and Prognostic Factors”: 167–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_16.
  14. Odashiro AN, Pereira PR, de Souza Filho JP, Cruess SR, Burnier MN (April 2005). “Retinoblastoma in an adult: case report and literature review”. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 40 (2): 188–91. doi:10.1016/S0008-4182(05)80032-8. PMID 16049534.
  15. Zhang Z, Shi JT, Wang NL, Ma JM (2012). “Retinoblastoma in a young adult mimicking Coats’ disease”. Int J Ophthalmol. 5 (5): 625–9. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.05.16. PMC 3484701. PMID 23166876.
  16. Yousef YA, Istetieh J, Nawaiseh I, Al-Hussaini M, Alrawashdeh K, Jaradat I, Sultan I, Mehyar M (September 2014). “Resistant retinoblastoma in a 23-year-old patient”. Oman J Ophthalmol. 7 (3): 138–40. doi:10.4103/0974-620X.142597. PMC 4220401. PMID 25378879.
  17. Takahashi T, Tamura S, Inoue M, Isayama Y, Sashikata T (February 1983). “Retinoblastoma in a 26-year-old adult”. Ophthalmology. 90 (2): 179–83. PMID 6856254.

Causes of Retinoblastoma

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

Overview

Retinoblastoma may be caused by mutation in both alleles of RB1 tumor suppressor gene or due to somatic amplification of the MYCN oncogene.

Causes

Heritable Retinoblastoma

Sporadic Heritable Retinoblastoma

References

  1. Du, W; Pogoriler, J (2006). “Retinoblastoma family genes”. Oncogene. 25 (38): 5190–5200. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209651. ISSN 0950-9232.
  2. Singh, Arun (2007). Clinical ophthalmic oncology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-1-4160-3167-3.
  3. Clark, Robin D.; Avishay, Stefanie G. (2015). “Retinoblastoma: Genetic Counseling and Testing”: 77–88. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_8.

Differentiating Retinoblastoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

Retinoblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause leukocoria. leukocoria may occur in several ocular conditions including tumors, vascular disease, inflammatory disorders, and also due to trauma.

Differentiating Retinoblastoma from Other Diseases

Retinoblastoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause leukocoria. Differential diagnosis of leukocoria in children include:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leukocoria
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tumors
 
 
 
Congenital malformations
 
 
 
Vascular diseases
 
 
 
Inflammatory diseases
 
 
 
Trauma
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retinoblastoma
Medulloepithelioma
Leukemia
Combined retinal hamartoma
Astrocytic hamartoma (Bourneville’s tuberous sclerosis)
 
 
 
Persistent fetal vasculature (PFV)
Posterior coloboma
Retinal fold
Myelinated nerve fibers
Morning glory syndrome
Retinal dysplasia
Norrie’s disease
Incontinentia pigmenti
Cataract
 
 
 
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)
Coats’ disease
Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR)
 
 
 
Ocular toxocariasis
Congenital toxoplasmosis
Congenital cytomegalovirus retinitis
Herpes simplex retinitis
Other types of fetal iridochoroiditis
Endophthalmitis
 
 
 
Intraocular foreign body
Vitreous hemorrhage
Retinal detachment
 
The above algorithm is adopted from Clinical Ophthalmic Oncology book [1]

Retinoblastoma should be differentiated from the following conditions that cause leukocoria:

Disease/Condition Clinical presentation Demographics/History Diagnosis Other notes
Retinoblastoma[2][3]
Coats’disease[4][5]
  • Sporadic in 100% of the cases
  • Almost always unilateral
  • More common among boys
  • The median age of diagnosis 5 to 9 years
Persistent fetal vasculature (formerly known as persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous)[5]
Astrocytic hamartoma[1]
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)[1]
  • Short axial length of eyes
Ocular toxocariasis [1]
  • Presence of retinal and/or vitreous traction in approximately all of the cases
Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR)[6]
Norrie’s Disease[1][7]

Coloboma[1]
MRI of the orbit showing Coats disease – Case courtesy of Dr Michael Sargent, https://radiopaedia.org/. From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/6089
MRI of the orbit showing retinal detachment – Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, https://radiopaedia.org/. From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/3134
MRI of the orbit showing retinoblastoma – Case courtesy of https://radiopaedia.org/. From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/11877
CT head showing hyperthyroid-induced orbitopathy – Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, https://radiopaedia.org/. From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/4854

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Singh, Arun (2015). Clinical ophthalmic oncology : retinoblastoma. Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 978-3-662-43451-2.
  2. Butros LJ, Abramson DH, Dunkel IJ (March 2002). “Delayed diagnosis of retinoblastoma: analysis of degree, cause, and potential consequences”. Pediatrics. 109 (3): E45. PMID 11875173.
  3. Sachdeva R, Schoenfield L, Marcotty A, Singh AD (June 2011). “Retinoblastoma with autoinfarction presenting as orbital cellulitis”. J AAPOS. 15 (3): 302–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.02.013. PMID 21680213.
  4. Silva RA, Dubovy SR, Fernandes CE, Hess DJ, Murray TG (December 2011). “Retinoblastoma with Coats’ response”. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 42 Online: e139–43. doi:10.3928/15428877-20111208-04. PMID 22165951.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Gupta N, Beri S, D’souza P (June 2009). “Cholesterolosis Bulbi of the Anterior Chamber in Coats Disease”. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. doi:10.3928/01913913-20090616-04. PMID 19645389.
  6. Gerstenblith, Adam (2012). The Wills eye manual : office and emergency room diagnosis and treatment of eye disease. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-1451109382.
  7. Howard GM, Ellsworth RM (October 1965). “Differential diagnosis of retinoblastoma. A statistical survey of 500 children. I. Relative frequency of the lesions which simulate retinoblastoma”. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 60 (4): 610–8. PMID 5897773.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States has been reported to be 1.2 cases per 100,000 children aged 4 years or younger. The median age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma is 18 months. The average age at diagnosis of retinoblastoma for children with unilateral disease and bilateral disease is 24 months and 12 months respectively. Retinoblastoma affects males and females equally. There is no racial predilection to the development of retinoblastoma.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States has been reported to be 1.2 cases per 100,000 children aged 4 years or younger.[1]
  • The tumor incidence has been reported 0.049 cases per 100,000 child aged 5 to 9.

Prevalence

  • There is no data on the prevalence of retinoblastoma.

Case-fatality rate/Mortality rate

Age

Gender

Race

  • There is no racial predilection to the development of retinoblastoma.[5]

Region

Country Incidence
Mali 4.25
Uganda 2.4
Zimbabwe 2.33
Hawaii 2.25
India 1.96
Vietnam 1.89
Singapore 1.88
New Zealand 1.78 – 1.86
Spain 1.78
Philippines 1.74
Colombia 1.71
Ecuador 1.66
Nigeria 1.61
Costa Rica 1.57
Peru 1.55

References

  1. Fernandes, Arthur Gustavo; Pollock, Benjamin D.; Rabito, Felicia A. (2018). “Retinoblastoma in the United States: A 40-Year Incidence and Survival Analysis”. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 55 (3): 182–188. doi:10.3928/01913913-20171116-03. ISSN 0191-3913.
  2. Dimaras, Helen; Kimani, Kahaki; Dimba, Elizabeth AO; Gronsdahl, Peggy; White, Abby; Chan, Helen SL; Gallie, Brenda L (2012). “Retinoblastoma”. The Lancet. 379 (9824): 1436–1446. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61137-9. ISSN 0140-6736.
  3. Kim, J W; Kathpalia, V; Dunkel, I J; Wong, R K; Riedel, E; Abramson, D H (2008). “Orbital recurrence of retinoblastoma following enucleation”. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 93 (4): 463–467. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.138453. ISSN 0007-1161.
  4. Chévez-Barrios, Patricia; Eagle, Ralph C.; Marback, Eduardo F. (2015). “Histopathologic Features and Prognostic Factors”: 167–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_16.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Abramson DH, Frank CM, Susman M, Whalen MP, Dunkel IJ, Boyd NW (1998). “Presenting signs of retinoblastoma”. J Pediatr. 132 (3 Pt 1): 505–8. PMID 9544909.
  6. Broaddus E, Topham A, Singh AD (2009). “Incidence of retinoblastoma in the USA: 1975-2004”. Br J Ophthalmol. 93 (1): 21–3. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.138750. PMID 18621794.
  7. Binder PS (1974). “Unusual manifestations of retinoblastoma”. Am J Ophthalmol. 77 (5): 674–9. PMID 4132770.
  8. Zakka KA, Yee RD, Foos RY (1983). “Retinoblastoma in a 12-year-old girl”. Ann Ophthalmol. 15 (1): 88–91. PMID 6830100.
  9. Kaliki S, Shields CL, Gupta A, Mishra DK, Das C, Say EA, Shields JA (December 2015). “NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACTIVE RETINOBLASTOMA IN ADULTS”. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 35 (12): 2483–8. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000612. PMID 26035399.
  10. Singh, Arun (2007). Clinical ophthalmic oncology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-1-4160-3167-3.

Risk Factors


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

Overview

Risk factors associated with the development of retinoblastoma are mutation in RB1 gene, a positive family history of retinoblastoma, living in areas with high incidence rate of the disease, HPV exposure and other environmental factors.

Risk Factors

Genetic Mutations

Family History

  • Approximately 10% of patients with retinoblastoma have a previously established family history of the disease.[2]
  • The magnitude of risk among offsprings of the proband depends upon the tumor presentation in the proband (unilateral or bilateral) and the relationship of the individual to the patient with retinoblastoma.
  • The table below provides the estimated risk percentage of developing retinoblastoma in individuals with a positive family history of retinoblastoma:
Relative of patient Bilateral involvement (100%) Unilateral involvement (15%)
Offspring (infant) 50 7.5
Parent 5 0.8
Sibling 2.5 0.4
Niece/nephew 1.3 0.2
Aunt/uncle 0.1 0.007
First cousin 0.05 0.007
The above table adopted from Ophthalmology journal [3]

HPV Exposure

Environmental Factors

  • Epidemiological data indicates that retinoblastoma has higher incidence in some geographic areas. For more information click here.
  • Other factors associated with an increased risk of retinoblastoma development include:[6]
    • Mother’s use of insect or garden sprays during pregnancy
    • Diagnostic x-ray with direct fetal exposure
    • Father’s employment as a welder, machinist, or related metal worker

References

  1. Clark, Robin D.; Avishay, Stefanie G. (2015). “Retinoblastoma: Genetic Counseling and Testing”: 77–88. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_8.
  2. Richter, Suzanne; Vandezande, Kirk; Chen, Ning; Zhang, Katherine; Sutherland, Joanne; Anderson, Julie; Han, Liping; Panton, Rachel; Branco, Patricia; Gallie, Brenda (2003). “Sensitive and Efficient Detection of RB1 Gene Mutations Enhances Care for Families with Retinoblastoma”. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (2): 253–269. doi:10.1086/345651. ISSN 0002-9297.
  3. Skalet, Alison H.; Gombos, Dan S.; Gallie, Brenda L.; Kim, Jonathan W.; Shields, Carol L.; Marr, Brian P.; Plon, Sharon E.; Chévez-Barrios, Patricia (2018). “Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma”. Ophthalmology. 125 (3): 453–458. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001. ISSN 0161-6420.
  4. Orjuela M, Castaneda VP, Ridaura C, Lecona E, Leal C, Abramson DH; et al. (2000). “Presence of human papilloma virus in tumor tissue from children with retinoblastoma: an alternative mechanism for tumor development”. Clin Cancer Res. 6 (10): 4010–6. PMID 11051250.
  5. Dryja, Thaddeus P.; Mukai, Shizuo; Petersen, Robert; Rapaport, Joyce M.; Walton, David; Yandell, David W. (1989). “Parental origin of mutations of the retinoblastoma gene”. Nature. 339 (6225): 556–558. doi:10.1038/339556a0. ISSN 0028-0836.
  6. Singh, Arun (2007). Clinical ophthalmic oncology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-1-4160-3167-3.

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

Early diagnosis of retinoblastoma is necessary to obtain the best outcomes for preservation of the vision and the eye. In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and ophthalmic pathology and genetics suggested a risk-stratified schedule for ophthalmic screening examinations. Estimated risk of retinoblastoma development is calculated according to the relativity of individuals to the family member with retinoblastoma.

Screening

Relative of patient Bilateral involvement (100%) Unilateral involvement (15%)
Offspring (infant) 50 7.5
Parent 5 0.8
Sibling 2.5 0.4
Niece/nephew 1.3 0.2
Aunt/uncle 0.1 0.007
First cousin 0.05 0.007
The above table adopted from Ophthalmology journal [1]
  • Next step in assessing the risk of these children is to estimate the approximate relative risk of retinoblastoma development according to the percentage mentioned in the above table.
  • Relatives are categorized into three categories:
    • High risk: Those with a risk percentage > 7.5%
    • Intermediate risk: Those with a risk percentage between 1% and 7.5% (including 7.5%)
    • Low risk: Those with a risk percentage < 1%
  • American Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists (AAOOP) guideline recommends scheduled eye examination for the screening of children at high risk of developing retinoblastoma. Screening should be initiated at birth and continued till the age of 7 years.[1]
  • No further examination is required after the age of 7 years except for those who are known carriers of the RB1 gene mutation.
  • For those who are carries of the RB1 gene mutation, screening should be continued indefinitely after the age of 7 years and should be done annually or every 2 years.
  • The following table is the recommended eye examination schedule for unaffected children of families with retinoblastoma depending on their age and risk percentage of tumor development:
Risk category or Age High risk Intermediate risk Low risk

Birth to 8 weeks

  • Every 2 – 4 weeks
  • Monthly
  • Monthly

> 8 – 12 weeks

  • Monthly
  • Monthly
  • Monthly

> 3 – 12 months

  • Monthly
  • Every 2 months
  • Every 3 months

> 12 – 24 months

  • Every 2 months
  • Every 3 months
  • Every 4 months

> 24 – 36 months

  • Every 3 months
  • Every 3 months
  • Every 6 months

> 36 – 48 months

  • Every 4 months
  • Every 4 – 6 months
  • Every 6 months

> 48 – 60 months

  • Every 6 months
  • Every 4 – 6 months
  • Annually

5 – 7 years

  • Every 6 months
  • Annually
  • Annually
This table is adopted from Ophthalmology journal[1]

Genetic Testing for Children with Retinoblastoma

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genetic testing for children with Retinoblastoma
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not available
 
 
 
Blood: RB1 mutation(+)
(germline mutation)
 
 
 
 
 
Blood: RB1 mutation(-)
Tumor: RB1 mutation(+)
 
 
Blood: RB1 mutation(-)
Tumor: RB1 mutation(-)
 
Blood: RB1 mutation(-)
Tumor: not available
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ophthalmic screening for all
the relatives with greater risk than the population
 
 
 
Assessment of relatives
for familial retinoblastoma
 
 
 
 
 
Ophthalmic screening and genetic analysis
not required for first degree relatives
 
 
 
 
 
No need for genetic analysis of first degree relatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relatives with RB1 mutation
 
Relatives without RB1 mutation
 
 
 
Ophthlamic screening for future offspring unless negative for parent’s mutation
 
 
 
 
Future offspring of affected child require ophthalmic screening
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ophthalmic screening for children as high risk
 
Ophthalmic screening not required
 
 
The above table is the recommended genetic analysis guidline for families with affected individuals and adopted from Ophthalmology journal[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Skalet, Alison H.; Gombos, Dan S.; Gallie, Brenda L.; Kim, Jonathan W.; Shields, Carol L.; Marr, Brian P.; Plon, Sharon E.; Chévez-Barrios, Patricia (2018). “Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma”. Ophthalmology. 125 (3): 453–458. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001. ISSN 0161-6420.
Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

Overview

If left untreated, retinoblastoma may progress to develop seeding in the eye, leading to retinal detachment, necrosis and invasion of the orbit, optic nerve invasion, and central nervous system invasion. The majority of untreated patients die of intracranial extension and disseminated disease within one year. Spontaneous regression of the tumor is a rare occurrence but may occur in a small number of cases. Common complications of retinoblastoma include metastasis, tumor recurrence, trilateral retinoblastoma, and subsequent neoplasms. Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with retinoblastoma with treatment is approximately 95% in the United States.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Complications

Prognosis

  • Those with heritable form of the disease have 50% risk of transmitting the mutation to their offspring.[11]
  • Regarding the variable accessibility of patients to the resources, the survival rate may range from < 30% in low and middle income societies to > 90% in developed countries.[12]
  • The overall 5-year survival rate increased over the years and was reported 97.3% from 2000 to 2012.[13]
  • Prognosis is generally good, and the survival rate of patients with retinoblastoma with treatment is approximately 95%, in the United States.[14]
  • The survival rate is higher for unilateral involvement than the bilateral form of the tumor.
  • It has been observed that survival rate varies depending upon the following factors:
  • The overall prognosis of trilateral retinoblastoma is poor and patients usually die within the first year of the diagnosis.[15]
  • Intraocular Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) has been observed to have the ability to predict the outcome of chemotherapy:[16]
    • Category A – C is associated with ≥ 90% chance to salvage the eye.
    • Category D is associated with a 47% chance to salvage the eye.
    • Category E is excluded due to eye enucleation.
  • Prognosis is usually poor with non-ocular tumor and it usually occurs in individuals who have received radiation therapy for their primary retinoblastoma tumors.[17]

References

  1. Pizzo, Philip (2011). Principles and practice of pediatric oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health. ISBN 160547682X.
  2. Goddard AG, Kingston JE, Hungerford JL (December 1999). “Delay in diagnosis of retinoblastoma: risk factors and treatment outcome”. Br J Ophthalmol. 83 (12): 1320–3. PMID 10574806.
  3. Singh, Arun D., Carol L. Shields, and Jerry A. Shields. “Prognostic factors in retinoblastoma.” Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus 37.3 (2000): 134.
  4. Khelfaoui F, Validire P, Auperin A, Quintana E, Michon J, Pacquement H, Desjardins L, Asselain B, Schlienger P, Vielh P (March 1996). “Histopathologic risk factors in retinoblastoma: a retrospective study of 172 patients treated in a single institution”. Cancer. 77 (6): 1206–13. PMID 8635145.
  5. Kim JW, Kathpalia V, Dunkel IJ, Wong RK, Riedel E, Abramson DH (April 2009). “Orbital recurrence of retinoblastoma following enucleation”. Br J Ophthalmol. 93 (4): 463–7. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.138453. PMID 18757474.
  6. Leal-Leal CA, Rivera-Luna R, Flores-Rojo M, Juárez-Echenique JC, Ordaz JC, Amador-Zarco J (January 2006). “Survival in extra-orbital metastatic retinoblastoma:treatment results”. Clin Transl Oncol. 8 (1): 39–44. PMID 16632438.
  7. Khodadoust AA, Roozitalab HM, Smith RE, Green WR (1977). “Spontaneous regression of retinoblastoma”. Surv Ophthalmol. 21 (6): 467–78. PMID 898013.
  8. Dunkel, Ira J.; Jubran, Rima F.; Gururangan, Sri; Chantada, Guillermo L.; Finlay, Jonathan L.; Goldman, Stewart; Khakoo, Yasmin; O’Brien, Joan M.; Orjuela, Manuela; Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos; Souweidane, Mark M.; Abramson, David H. (2010). “Trilateral retinoblastoma: Potentially curable with intensive chemotherapy”. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 54 (3): 384–387. doi:10.1002/pbc.22336. ISSN 1545-5009.
  9. Kim, Jonathan W.; Dunkel, Ira (2015). “Trilateral Retinoblastoma”: 209–213. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43451-2_20.
  10. Marees T, Moll AC, Imhof SM, de Boer MR, Ringens PJ, van Leeuwen FE (December 2008). “Risk of second malignancies in survivors of retinoblastoma: more than 40 years of follow-up”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100 (24): 1771–9. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn394. PMID 19066271.
  11. Garber JE, Offit K (January 2005). “Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes”. J. Clin. Oncol. 23 (2): 276–92. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.10.042. PMID 15637391.
  12. Dimaras H, Kimani K, Dimba EA, Gronsdahl P, White A, Chan HS, Gallie BL (April 2012). “Retinoblastoma”. Lancet. 379 (9824): 1436–46. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61137-9. PMID 22414599.
  13. Fernandes, Arthur Gustavo; Pollock, Benjamin D.; Rabito, Felicia A. (2018). “Retinoblastoma in the United States: A 40-Year Incidence and Survival Analysis”. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 55 (3): 182–188. doi:10.3928/01913913-20171116-03. ISSN 0191-3913.
  14. Lin P, O’Brien JM (2009). “Frontiers in the management of retinoblastoma”. Am J Ophthalmol. 148 (2): 192–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.004. PMID 19477707.
  15. Blach LE, McCormick B, Abramson DH, Ellsworth RM (July 1994). “Trilateral retinoblastoma–incidence and outcome: a decade of experience”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 29 (4): 729–33. PMID 8040018.
  16. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, Czyz C, Leahey A, Meadows AT, Shields JA (December 2006). “The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success”. Ophthalmology. 113 (12): 2276–80. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.018. PMID 16996605.
  17. Aerts I, Pacquement H, Doz F, Mosseri V, Desjardins L, Sastre X, Michon J, Rodriguez J, Schlienger P, Zucker JM, Quintana E (July 2004). “Outcome of second malignancies after retinoblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated at the Institut Curie”. Eur. J. Cancer. 40 (10): 1522–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.023. PMID 15196536.
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Staging | History & Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Tests | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

References

References

See also

See also

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH