Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Behçet's disease

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]

Synonyms and keywords: Behcet disease; Behçet syndrome; oculobuccogenital syndrome; Behçet’s Syndrome

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]

Overview

Behçet’s disease is a chronic inflammatory condition caused by disturbances in the immune system. The immune system normally protects the body against infections through a controlled inflammatory reaction against the pathogen. In Behçet’s disease, the immune response becomes overactive and produces unpredictable outbreaks of exaggerated inflammation. This extra inflammation affects blood vessels, in particular, the smaller vessels. As a result, symptoms appear wherever the exaggerated inflammation response is produced. The inflammatory response can occur anywhere on the body where there is a blood supply.

Historical Perspective

Behcet disease was first discovered by Hippocrates in the 5th century. In 1937, Hulusi Behçet, Turkish dermatologist described Behçet’s disease that genital ulcerations, uveitis, and aphthous ulcers are it’s major presentations.

Classification

Neurologic disease of Behcet disease is classified into parenchymal or non-parenchymal. Parenchymal disease is due to lesions in the corticospinal tract, brainstem, periventricular white matter, spinal cord, and basal ganglia. Focal parenchymal lesions and complications of vascular thrombosis are the most common abnormalities. Progressive personality change, psychiatric disorders, and dementia may develop. Parenchymal disease may be divided into acuteand chronic progressive neuro-Behçet syndrome. Central nervous system lesions are detectable with MRI. In the chronic phase, lesions may be smaller or resolve, atrophy may be present, nonspecific white matter lesions may be present, and lesions usually do not enhance. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may show increased protein and increased cells, and neutrophils may predominate. Non-parenchymal disease of Behcet disease include cerebral venous thrombosis, intracranial hypertension syndrome (pseudotumor cerebri), acute meningeal syndrome, and uncommonly stroke due to arterial thrombosis, dissection, or aneurysm. On average, a period of approximately five to six years elapsed between the onset of the earliest non-neurologic symptoms of Behçet syndrome and the appearance of neurologic symptoms or findings.

Pathophysiology

It is understood that Behçet disease is the result of vasculitis. It involves all sizes of blood vessels ( small, medium, and large). Arteries and veins are both involved in Behçet disease. Major mechanisms in pathogenesis of Behçet disease include environmental factors such as bacteria, viruses, and heat shock proteins (present in some bacteria and some of the bacterial HSPs share similaritis with human HSPs). Streptococcus sanguinis, streptococcus pyogenes, and mycobacterium tuberculosis produce HSPs that trigger anti HSP60 and anti HSP65 antibodies and then they target human HSPs and immune response such as uveitis in parenchymal neuro-Behçet disease, CD4+ T cells activation, secretion of cytokines and inflammation. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of Behçet disease include human leukocyte antigens, particularly HLA-B51.

Causes

The cause of Behçet disease has not been identified.

Differentiating Behçet’s disease from other Diseases

Behçet’s disease needs to be differentiated from other diseases that present with similar symptoms such as erythema nodosum and inflammatory bowel disease.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 0.12 to 7.5 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Behçet disease commonly affects young adults 20 to 40 years of age. Males are more commonly affected by Behçet disease than females. Behçet disease usually affects individuals of the Turkish, Asian, and Middle Eastern populations. Middle Eastern and Asian individuals are more likely to develop Behçet disease due to the increased incidence of skin pathergy and HLA-B51 antigen. The male to female ratio ranges from approximately 11 to 1 to 2 to 1. The majority of Behçet disease cases are reported along the ancient silk road (from eastern Asia to the Mediterranean).

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of Behcet disease may be occupational, environmental, genetic, and viral. Behçet’s disease can affect people in any age, but the most common age is 20~30 years old. Behçet’s disease is more common in Middle East and Japan then in other race. It is rare in America. Researches demonstrate that the presence of the gene HLA–B51 is a risk factor for Behçet’s disease.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Behçet disease.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

The symptoms of Behçet disease usually develop in the second to third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as uveitis, mouth sores, and skin lesions. Common complications of Behçet disease include neuro Behçet, vision loss, and aneurysm. Depending on the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as good. The worst prognoses are associated with retinal vasculitis, leading to blindness; vascular aneurysm formation, with possible rupture; and neuro–Behçet syndrome, which may lead to dementia despite appropriate aggressive treatment.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Currently, there is not a specific test to confirm the diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. It is diagnosed clinically by specific patterns of symptoms and repeated outbreaks obtained by a thorough history of the patient’s symptoms (outlined below). Behçet’s disease is a diagnosis of exclusion, and other chronic inflammatory diseases should be evaluated for. The various inflammatory symptoms do not necessarily occur together, and they will vary in severity.

History and Symptoms

The hallmark of Behçet disease is recurrent aphthous ulcerations, genital ulcers, and uveitis. A positive history of joint pains and skin lesions are suggestive of Behçet disease. The most common symptoms of Behçet disease include mouth sores, uveitis, joint pain, and genital sores. Less common symptoms of Behçet disease include diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache, skin lesions-red nodules, acne, joint pains, and poor balance.

Physical Examination

Patients with Behçet disease usually appear normal. Vital signs of patients with Behçet disease are usually normal. The presence of mouth sores, genital ulcers, and vision problems on physical examination are diagnostic of Behçet disease. Skin examination of patients with Behçet disease shows erythema nodosum lesions typically occur on the extremities, especially the lower legs, but they can also be observed on the face, neck, and buttocks. The lesions are painful and resolve spontaneously, although some may ulcerate or leave hyperpigmentation. A folliculitis like rash, resembling acne vulgaris, appears on the face, neck, chest, back, and hairline of patients. Some lesions become more pustular; 24-48 hours after a sterile needle prick, some patients develop erythema with a nodule or pustule at the prick site. Ophthalmoscopic exam may be abnormal with findings of retinal vasculitis, and vaso-occlusive lesions. Uveitis of anterior and posterior chambers diagnosed with slit-lamp examination. Erythematous throat with tonsillar swelling, and exudates. Ulcers 2-15 mm in diameter, with a necrotic center and surrounding red rim. A white or yellow pseudomembrane covers the surface of the ulcer. The ulcers are typically painful, nonscarring, and found on the lips, buccal mucosa, tongue, tonsils, and larynx. Most last 7-14 days and occur in crops. Hypopyon may be observed in the anterior chamber. Genitourinary examination of patients with Behçet disease will show ulcers on the scrotum and vulva, painful and heal with scarring. Genital ulcerations tend to be deeper and larger than the oral lesions. Females can have asymptomatic ulcers. Neuromuscular examination of patients with Behçet disease will show CNS involvement in 25% of the cases. Immune-mediated meningoencephalitis predominantly involves the brainstem. Meningitis, encephalitis, focal neurological deficits, and psychiatric symptoms can be present. Irreversible dementia can occur.

Laboratory Findings

The laboratory tests used to diagnose Behçet’s disease are a pathergy test, a skin biopsy, and a lumbar puncture.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with Behçet’s disease.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with Behçet disease.

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

Echocardiography is useful in patients with murmurs because it is useful for diagnosing the valve vegetations and ventricular thrombi, which may occur in Behçet disease. Vascular involvement can be seen in up to 40% of patients with Behçet disease (BS) with the lower-extremity vein thrombosis (LEVT) being the most common type where ultrasonography is needed.

CT Scan

There are no CT scan findings associated with Behçet disease. However, a CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of complications of Behçet disease including visualization of neurological lesions (helpful in patients with CNSinvolvement), and enlargement of ventricles or subarachnoid spaces.

MRI

There are no MRI findings associated with Behçet disease. MRI findings of the brain may be normal even in the presence of neurologic involvement. However, a MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of complications of Behçet disease, which include enlargement of ventricles or subarachnoid spaces, and neurological lesions present in CNS involvement.

Other Imaging Findings

Endoscopy of the GI tract is useful for detecting gastrointestinal ulcerations in Behçet disease. A thorough eye examination and fluorescein angiography for evaluation of retinal vessels. Follow-up visits with an ophthalmologist should be scheduled at least every 6-12 months. Neuropsychologic testing may be useful with CNS involvement, revealing memory impairment or personality changes, and can be useful in monitoring neuropsychologic status.

Other Diagnostic Studies

There are no other diagnostic studies associated with Behçet disease.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Current treatment is aimed at easing the symptoms, reducing inflammation, and controlling the immune system. Anti-TNF therapy, such as infliximab, has shown promise in treating the uveitis associated with the disease. Another Anti-TNF agent, etanercept, may be useful in patients with mainly skin and mucosal symptoms. Interferon alfa-2a, azathioprine, colchicine, thalidomide, dapsone and rebamipide are among other agents that are used alternatives.

Surgery

Surgery in Behcet’s disease is performed to treat severe complications such as gastrointestinal perforations or ocular inflammatory diseases.

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of Behçet disease.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of Behçet disease.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective
  • Geographic origins: Behçet’s syndrome historically occurred in regions along the ancient Silk Road, which stretched from the Mediterranean through the Middle East to East Asia. This geographic distribution has shaped the understanding of its epidemiology


  • Prevalence patterns: The highest prevalence has been reported in Turkey (420 per 100,000 persons), with decreasing frequency toward Northern Europe and the United States. Migration studies also highlighted that immigrants from high-prevalence regions carry increased—but still lower than native—risks


  • Recognition as a syndrome: Over the last 20 years, several discoveries have reshaped the understanding of Behçet’s disease. It has shifted from being considered a clinical curiosity to being classified as a primary systemic vasculitis affecting veins and arteries of all sizes. This change reflects the broader spectrum of signs and symptoms recognized and the prognostic implications for patients


  • Early genetic insights: The first genetic association identified was with HLA-B*51, discovered decades ago. Later, genome-wide association studies and sequencing technologies revealed multiple additional genes, leading to new classification schemes and insights into immune dysregulation


  • Evolution of classification criteria: Diagnostic and classification approaches have evolved—from the 1990 International Study Group (ISG) criteria, which required recurrent oral ulcers plus two additional findings, to the 2014 International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD), which introduced a point-based system incorporating neurologic and vascular involvement. These refinements reflect recognition of the disease’s multisystemic nature

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]Mahda Alihashemi M.D. [3]Dheeraj Makkar, M.D.[4]

Overview

Behcet disease was first discovered by Hippocrates in the 5th century. In 1937, Hulusi Behçet, Turkish dermatologist described behcet syndrome that genital ulcerations, uveitis, and aphthous ulcers are it’s major presentations.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

  • Geographic origins: Behçet’s syndrome historically occurred in regions along the ancient Silk Road, which stretched from the Mediterranean through the Middle East to East Asia. This geographic distribution has shaped the understanding of its epidemiology

.

Prevalence patterns: The highest prevalence has been reported in Turkey (420 per 100,000 persons), with decreasing frequency toward Northern Europe and the United States. Migration studies also highlighted that immigrants from high-prevalence regions carry increased—but still lower than native—risks .

Recognition as a syndrome: Over the last 20 years, several discoveries have reshaped the understanding of Behçet’s disease. It has shifted from being considered a clinical curiosity to being classified as a primary systemic vasculitis affecting veins and arteries of all sizes. This change reflects the broader spectrum of signs and symptoms recognized and the prognostic implications for patients .

Early genetic insights: The first genetic association identified was with HLA-B*51, discovered decades ago. Later, genome-wide association studies and sequencing technologies revealed multiple additional genes, leading to new classification schemes and insights into immune dysregulation .

Evolution of classification criteria: Diagnostic and classification approaches have evolved—from the 1990 International Study Group (ISG) criteria, which required recurrent oral ulcers plus two additional findings, to the 2014 International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD), which introduced a point-based system incorporating neurologic and vascular involvement. These refinements reflect recognition of the disease’s multisystemic nature .

References

  1. ↑ FEIGENBAUM A (1956). “Description of Behçet’s syndrome in the Hippocratic third book of endemic diseases”. Br J Ophthalmol. 40 (6): 355–7. PMC 509495. PMID 13355940.
  2. ↑ Mutlu S, Scully C (1994). “The person behind the eponym: HulĂťsi Behçet (1889-1948)”. J Oral Pathol Med. 23 (7): 289–90. PMID 7965882.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]

Overview

Neurologic disease of Behcet disease is classified into parenchymal or non-parenchymal. Parenchymal disease is due to lesions in the corticospinal tract, brainstem, periventricular white matter, spinal cord, and basal ganglia. Focal parenchymal lesions and complications of vascular thrombosis are the most common abnormalities. Progressive personality change, psychiatric disorders, and dementia may develop. Parenchymal disease may be divided into acute and chronic progressive neuro-Behçet syndrome. Central nervous system lesions are detectable with MRI. In the chronic phase, lesions may be smaller or resolve, atrophy may be present, nonspecific white matter lesions may be present, and lesions usually do not enhance. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may show increased protein and increased cells, and neutrophils may predominate. Non-parenchymal disease of Behcet disease include cerebral venous thrombosis, intracranial hypertension syndrome (pseudotumor cerebri), acute meningeal syndrome, and uncommonly stroke due to arterial thrombosis, dissection, or aneurysm. On average, a period of approximately five to six years elapsed between the onset of the earliest non-neurologic symptoms of Behçet syndrome and the appearance of neurologic symptoms or findings.

Classification

Neurologic disease

Parenchymal disease

Non-parenchymal disease

Non-parenchymal disease of Behcet disease include the following:

  • In one large series, the clinical features and outcomes of 200 patients with Behçet syndrome and neurologic involvement were reported.[5]
  • On an average, a period of approximately five to six years elapsed between the onset of the earliest non-neurologic symptoms of Behçet syndrome and the appearance of neurologic symptoms or findings.
  • Nevertheless, neurologic findings may also appear concurrently (7.5 percent) or precede non-neurologic features (3 percent). Twenty percent of those with neurologic findings were asymptomatic.

References

  1. ↑ Atasoy HT, Tunc TO, Unal AE, Emre U, Koca R, Esturk E; et al. (2007). “Peripheral nervous system involvement in patients with Behçet disease”. Neurologist. 13 (4): 225–30. doi:10.1097/NRL.0b013e31805778d1. PMID 17622917.
  2. ↑ Akbulut L, Gur G, Bodur H, Alli N, Borman P (2007). “Peripheral neuropathy in Behçet disease: an electroneurophysiological study”. Clin Rheumatol. 26 (8): 1240–4. doi:10.1007/s10067-006-0466-0. PMID 17149536.
  3. ↑ Benamour S, Naji T, Alaoui FZ, El-Kabli H, El-Aidouni S (2006). “[Neurological involvement in Behçet’s disease. 154 cases from a cohort of 925 patients and review of the literature]”. Rev Neurol (Paris). 162 (11): 1084–90. PMID 17086145.
  4. ↑ Ishido M, Horita N, Takeuchi M, Shibuya E, Yamane T, Kawagoe T; et al. (2017). “Distinct clinical features between acute and chronic progressive parenchymal neuro-Behçet disease: meta-analysis”. Sci Rep. 7 (1): 10196. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09938-z. PMC 5579041. PMID 28860590.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Akman-Demir G, Serdaroglu P, Tasçi B (1999). “Clinical patterns of neurological involvement in Behçet’s disease: evaluation of 200 patients. The Neuro-Behçet Study Group”. Brain. 122 ( Pt 11): 2171–82. PMID 10545401.
  6. ↑ Lee SH, Yoon PH, Park SJ, Kim DI (2001). “MRI findings in neuro-behçet’s disease”. Clin Radiol. 56 (6): 485–94. doi:10.1053/crad.2000.0675. PMID 11428799.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Kalra S, Silman A, Akman-Demir G, Bohlega S, Borhani-Haghighi A, Constantinescu CS; et al. (2014). “Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus recommendations”. J Neurol. 261 (9): 1662–76. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-7209-3. PMC 4155170. PMID 24366648.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Farah S, Al-Shubaili A, Montaser A, Hussein JM, Malaviya AN, Mukhtar M; et al. (1998). “Behçet’s syndrome: a report of 41 patients with emphasis on neurological manifestations”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 64 (3): 382–4. PMC 2169980. PMID 9527155.
  9. ↑ O’Duffy JD (1994). “Behçet’s disease”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 6 (1): 39–43. PMID 8031678.
  10. ↑ Saadoun D, Wechsler B, Resche-Rigon M, Trad S, Le Thi Huong D, Sbai A; et al. (2009). “Cerebral venous thrombosis in Behçet’s disease”. Arthritis Rheum. 61 (4): 518–26. doi:10.1002/art.24393. PMID 19333987.
  11. ↑ Uluduz D, KĂźrtĂźncĂź M, YapÄącÄą Z, Seyahi E, Kasapçopur Ö, Özdoğan H; et al. (2011). “Clinical characteristics of pediatric-onset neuro-Behçet disease”. Neurology. 77 (21): 1900–5. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318238edeb. PMID 22076549.

Template:WH Template:WS

1990 International Study Group (ISG) Classification

1990 International Study Group (ISG) Classification

Mandatory criterion:

Recurrent oral ulceration (≥3 times in 1 year).

Plus two or more of the following:

Genital ulceration.

Eye lesions (anterior or posterior uveitis, vitreous cells, or retinal vasculitis).

Skin lesions (erythema nodosum, pseudofolliculitis, or papulopustular lesions).

Positive pathergy test.

Sensitivity: 81–85%.

Specificity: 96%.

2014 International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD)

2014 International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD)

A point-based system:

Recurrent oral ulceration → 2 points.

Genital ulceration → 2 points.

Ocular lesions → 2 points.

Skin lesions → 1 point.

Vascular manifestations → 1 point.

Neurologic manifestations → 1 point.

Positive pathergy test → 1 point (optional).

Classification requires ≥4 points.

Sensitivity: 94–95%.

Specificity: 91–92%.

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2], Mahda Alihashemi M.D. [3] Dheeraj Makkar, M.D.[4]


Overview

It is understood that Behçet disease is the result of vasculitis. It involves all sizes of blood vessels ( small, medium, and large). Arteries and veins are both involved in Behçet disease. Major mechanisms in pathogenesis of Behçet disease include environmental factors such as bacteria, viruses, and heat shock proteins (present in some bacteria and some of the bacterial HSPs share similaritis with human HSPs). Streptococcus sanguinis, streptococcus pyogenes, and mycobacterium tuberculosis produce HSPs that trigger anti HSP60 and anti HSP65 antibodies and then they target human HSPs and immune response such as uveitis in parenchymal neuro-Behçet disease, CD4+ T cells activation, secretion of cytokines and inflammation. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of Behçet disease include human leukocyte antigens, particularly HLA-B51.

Pathophysiology

Pathophysiology of Behçet’s Syndrome

  • Genetic Predisposition

Behçet’s syndrome develops in genetically predisposed hosts after exposure to environmental triggers.

The first genetic association was with HLA-B*51, particularly HLA-B*51:01, which increases disease risk nearly sixfold.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have since revealed additional key genes:

ERAP1 (antigen processing, interacts with HLA-B*51).

IL23R–IL12RB2, STAT4, IL10 (T-cell polarization toward Th1 and Th17 responses).

KLRC4 (NK cell regulation).

CCR1–CCR3 (cell chemotaxis).

Other implicated genes include TNFAIP3 (A20 haploinsufficiency), MEFV (familial Mediterranean fever), and TLR4/NOD2/FUT2, linking Behçet’s to autoinflammatory syndromes.

Epigenetic changes, such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications in immune cells, further amplify susceptibility .

  • Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Proposed triggers include:

Microorganisms (e.g., Streptococcus species, HSV-1).

Dietary factors (histamine-releasing foods such as citrus, nuts, and cheese).

Poor oral hygiene and stress.

Studies show gut and salivary microbiome dysbiosis, leading to abnormal antigen repertoires that may drive immune responses .

  • Immune Dysregulation

Adaptive immunity:

CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes differentiate into Th1 (producing TNF-Îą, IFN-Îł) and Th17 (producing IL-17, IL-23) subsets.

There is diminished regulatory T-cell activity, further tipping the balance toward inflammation.

CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells also contribute to cytotoxicity.

Innate immunity:

Neutrophils are the main infiltrating cell type in lesions.

They generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) and release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), promoting vascular inflammation and thrombosis.

Key inflammatory pathway:

The NF-ÎşB pathway is upregulated in antigen-presenting cells, neutrophils, and T cells, amplifying proinflammatory cytokine production .

  • Histopathology

Biopsies often show:

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis.

Neutrophilic or lymphocytic perivascular infiltrates.

Microvascular thrombi.

Neutrophilic dermal infiltrates.

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Gross Pathology

Oral ulcers Source:By Samuel Freire da Silva, M.D. in homage to The Master And Professor Delso Bringel Calheiros


Microscopic Pathology

References

  1. ↑ Zeidan MJ, Saadoun D, Garrido M, Klatzmann D, Six A, Cacoub P (December 2016). “Behçet’s disease physiopathology: a contemporary review”. Auto Immun Highlights. 7 (1): 4. doi:10.1007/s13317-016-0074-1. PMC 4751097. PMID 26868128.
  2. ↑ Direskeneli H (2013). “Innate and Adaptive Responses to Heat Shock Proteins in Behcet’s Disease”. Genet Res Int. 2013: 249157. doi:10.1155/2013/249157. PMC 3893747. PMID 24490075.
  3. ↑ Tanaka T, Yamakawa N, Koike N, Suzuki J, Mizuno F, Usui M (June 1999). “Behçet’s disease and antibody titers to various heat-shock protein 60s”. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 7 (2): 69–74. PMID 10420201.
  4. ↑ de Menthon M, Lavalley MP, Maldini C, Guillevin L, Mahr A (October 2009). “HLA-B51/B5 and the risk of Behçet’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control genetic association studies”. Arthritis Rheum. 61 (10): 1287–96. doi:10.1002/art.24642. PMC 3867978. PMID 19790126.
  5. ↑ Akpolat T, Koç Y, Yeniay I, Akpek G, GĂźllĂź I, Kansu E, Kiraz S, Ersoy F, Batman F, Kansu T (November 1992). “Familial Behçet’s disease”. Eur J Med. 1 (7): 391–5. PMID 1341477.
  6. ↑ Fresko I, Soy M, Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Yavuz S, TĂźmer Z, Yazici H (January 1998). “Genetic anticipation in Behçet’s syndrome”. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 57 (1): 45–8. PMC 1752455. PMID 9536823.
  7. ↑ Wei F, Zhang YU, Li W (June 2016). “A meta-analysis of the association between Behçet’s disease and MICA-A6”. Biomed Rep. 4 (6): 741–745. doi:10.3892/br.2016.644. PMC 4887777. PMID 27284416.
  8. ↑ Sakane T, Takeno M (September 2000). “Novel approaches to Behçet’s disease”. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 9 (9): 1993–2005. doi:10.1517/13543784.9.9.1993. PMID 11060788.
  9. ↑ Karasneh JA, Hajeer AH, Silman A, Worthington J, Ollier WE, Gul A (May 2005). “Polymorphisms in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene are associated with Behçet’s disease”. Rheumatology (Oxford). 44 (5): 614–7. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh561. PMID 15705632.
  10. ↑ Ahmad T, Wallace GR, James T, Neville M, Bunce M, Mulcahy-Hawes K, Armuzzi A, Crawshaw J, Fortune F, Walton R, Stanford MR, Welsh KI, Marshall SE, Jewell DP (March 2003). “Mapping the HLA association in Behçet’s disease: a role for tumor necrosis factor polymorphisms?”. Arthritis Rheum. 48 (3): 807–13. doi:10.1002/art.10815. PMID 12632436.
  11. ↑ Salvarani C, Boiardi L, Casali B, Olivieri I, Cantini F, Salvi F, Malatesta R, La Corte R, Triolo G, Ferrante A, Filippini D, Paolazzi G, Sarzi-Puttini P, Nicoli D, Farnetti E, Chen Q, Pulsatelli L (September 2004). “Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms in Behçet’s disease”. J. Rheumatol. 31 (9): 1785–9. PMID 15338501.
  12. ↑ Nakao K, Isashiki Y, Sonoda S, Uchino E, Shimonagano Y, Sakamoto T (February 2007). “Nitric oxide synthase and superoxide dismutase gene polymorphisms in Behçet disease”. Arch. Ophthalmol. 125 (2): 246–51. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.2.246. PMID 17296902.
  13. ↑ Tursen U, Tamer L, Api H, Yildirim H, Baz K, Ikizoglu G, Atik U (February 2007). “Cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in patients with Behcet’s disease”. Int. J. Dermatol. 46 (2): 153–6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.02957.x. PMID 17269966.
  14. ↑ Sousa I, Shahram F, Francisco D, Davatchi F, Abdollahi BS, Ghaderibarmi F, Nadji A, Mojarad Shafiee N, Xavier JM, Oliveira SA (October 2015). “Brief report: association of CCR1, KLRC4, IL12A-AS1, STAT4, and ERAP1 With Behçet’s disease in Iranians”. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67 (10): 2742–8. doi:10.1002/art.39240. PMID 26097239.
  15. ↑ Yalçin B, Atakan N, Dogan S (December 2014). “Association of interleukin-23 receptor gene polymorphism with Behçet disease”. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 39 (8): 881–7. doi:10.1111/ced.12400. PMID 25156021.
  16. ↑ Livneh A, Aksentijevich I, Langevitz P, Torosyan Y, G-Shoham N, Shinar Y, Pras E, Zaks N, Padeh S, Kastner DL, Pras M (March 2001). “A single mutated MEFV allele in Israeli patients suffering from familial Mediterranean fever and Behçet’s disease (FMF-BD)”. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 9 (3): 191–6. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200608. PMID 11313758.

Template:WH Template:WS

Genetic Predisposition

Genetic Predisposition

Behçet’s syndrome develops in genetically predisposed hosts after exposure to environmental triggers.

The first genetic association was with HLA-B*51, particularly HLA-B*51:01, which increases disease risk nearly sixfold.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have since revealed additional key genes:

ERAP1 (antigen processing, interacts with HLA-B*51).

IL23R–IL12RB2, STAT4, IL10 (T-cell polarization toward Th1 and Th17 responses).

KLRC4 (NK cell regulation).

CCR1–CCR3 (cell chemotaxis).

Other implicated genes include TNFAIP3 (A20 haploinsufficiency), MEFV (familial Mediterranean fever), and TLR4/NOD2/FUT2, linking Behçet’s to autoinflammatory syndromes.

Epigenetic changes, such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications in immune cells, further amplify susceptibility .

Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Proposed triggers include:

Microorganisms (e.g., Streptococcus species, HSV-1).

Dietary factors (histamine-releasing foods such as citrus, nuts, and cheese).

Poor oral hygiene and stress.

Studies show gut and salivary microbiome dysbiosis, leading to abnormal antigen repertoires that may drive immune responses .

Immune Dysregulation

Immune Dysregulation

Adaptive immunity:

CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes differentiate into Th1 (producing TNF-Îą, IFN-Îł) and Th17 (producing IL-17, IL-23) subsets.

There is diminished regulatory T-cell activity, further tipping the balance toward inflammation.

CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells also contribute to cytotoxicity.

Innate immunity:

Neutrophils are the main infiltrating cell type in lesions.

They generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) and release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), promoting vascular inflammation and thrombosis.

Key inflammatory pathway:

The NF-ÎşB pathway is upregulated in antigen-presenting cells, neutrophils, and T cells, amplifying proinflammatory cytokine production .

Histopathology

Histopathology

Biopsies often show:

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis.

Neutrophilic or lymphocytic perivascular infiltrates.

Microvascular thrombi.

Neutrophilic dermal infiltrates.

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]Dheeraj Makkar, M.D.[3]

Overview

The cause of Behçet disease has not been identified. To review risk factors for the development of Behçet disease, click here.

Causes

The cause of Behçet disease has not been identified. To review risk factors for the development of Behçet disease, click here. Behçet’s syndrome is a complex, multifactorial disorder in which both genetic predisposition and environmental triggers interact to produce immune dysregulation and widespread vascular inflammation.

  • Genetic Factors

HLA-B*51: The first and strongest genetic association, particularly the HLA-B*51:01 subtype, confers about a sixfold higher risk of developing Behçet’s syndrome.

Other immune-related genes: Genome-wide association studies have identified additional susceptibility loci, including:

ERAP1 (involved in antigen processing and presentation).

IL23R–IL12RB2, STAT4, and IL10 (linked to polarization of Th1 and Th17 responses).

KLRC4 (regulation of natural killer cell activity).

CCR1–CCR3 (chemotaxis).

Autoinflammatory genes: Variants in TNFAIP3 (A20 haploinsufficiency) and MEFV (familial Mediterranean fever gene) suggest shared mechanisms with other monogenic inflammatory disorders.

Epigenetics: Studies have shown aberrant DNA methylation and abnormal histone activation marks in immune cells, further enhancing inflammatory responses .

  • Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Microorganisms: Bacteria (e.g., Streptococcus species), viruses (e.g., HSV-1), and their byproducts have been implicated as potential initiating factors.

Dietary factors: Histamine-releasing foods such as citrus fruits, nuts, and cheese may precipitate flares.

Lifestyle and local factors: Poor oral hygiene and psychological stress have been proposed as contributing triggers.

Microbiome imbalance: Alterations in gut and salivary flora (dysbiosis) have been repeatedly observed, suggesting that microbial antigens may stimulate abnormal immune activation .

  • Immune Dysregulation

Behçet’s syndrome displays both autoimmune and autoinflammatory features.

Adaptive immunity:

Hyperactive Th1 and Th17 responses lead to overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-Îą, IFN-Îł, IL-17, and IL-23.

Regulatory T-cell activity is diminished, reducing immune tolerance.

Innate immunity:

Neutrophils are the predominant infiltrating cells, generating reactive oxygen species and releasing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which contribute to vascular inflammation and thrombosis.

NF-ÎşB pathway: Heightened signaling in antigen-presenting cells, T cells, and neutrophils amplifies the inflammatory cascade

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Genetic Predisposition

Genetic Predisposition

Behçet’s syndrome develops in genetically predisposed hosts after exposure to environmental triggers.

The first genetic association was with HLA-B*51, particularly HLA-B*51:01, which increases disease risk nearly sixfold.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have since revealed additional key genes:

ERAP1 (antigen processing, interacts with HLA-B*51).

IL23R–IL12RB2, STAT4, IL10 (T-cell polarization toward Th1 and Th17 responses).

KLRC4 (NK cell regulation).

CCR1–CCR3 (cell chemotaxis).

Other implicated genes include TNFAIP3 (A20 haploinsufficiency), MEFV (familial Mediterranean fever), and TLR4/NOD2/FUT2, linking Behçet’s to autoinflammatory syndromes.

Epigenetic changes, such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications in immune cells, further amplify susceptibility .

Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Environmental and Microbial Triggers

Proposed triggers include:

Microorganisms (e.g., Streptococcus species, HSV-1).

Dietary factors (histamine-releasing foods such as citrus, nuts, and cheese).

Poor oral hygiene and stress.

Studies show gut and salivary microbiome dysbiosis, leading to abnormal antigen repertoires that may drive immune responses .

Immune Dysregulation

Immune Dysregulation

Adaptive immunity:

CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes differentiate into Th1 (producing TNF-Îą, IFN-Îł) and Th17 (producing IL-17, IL-23) subsets.

There is diminished regulatory T-cell activity, further tipping the balance toward inflammation.

CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells also contribute to cytotoxicity.

Innate immunity:

Neutrophils are the main infiltrating cell type in lesions.

They generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) and release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), promoting vascular inflammation and thrombosis.

Key inflammatory pathway:

The NF-ÎşB pathway is upregulated in antigen-presenting cells, neutrophils, and T cells, amplifying proinflammatory cytokine production .

Histopathology

Histopathology

Biopsies often show:

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis.

Neutrophilic or lymphocytic perivascular infiltrates.

Microvascular thrombi.

Neutrophilic dermal infiltrates.

NOTOC Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [3] Template:DMAKKAR

Differentiating Behçet’s disease from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2]

Overview

Behçet’s disease needs to be differentiated from other diseases that present with similar symptoms such as erythema nodosum and inflammatory bowel disease.

Differentiating Behçet’s disease from other Diseases

Differentiating Behçet’s disease from other diseases that may cause arthritis and rash

Abbreviations: ANA: Antinuclear antibody, RF: Rheumatoid factor, Anti-CCp: Anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody, Anti U1RNP: Anti-U1 ribonucleoprotein antibodies , Anti Sm : Anti-Sm antibodies, Anti Ro: Anti Ro antibody also called anti-SjĂśgren’s-syndrome-related antigen A antibody, Anti-dsDNA: Anti-double stranded DNA.

Disease Arthritis Auto-antibodies Raynaud phenomenon Rash pattern Distinguishing/specific features
Polyarthritis Tenderness Edema Deformity /Erosion Pattern ANA RF Anti-CCp Anti U1RNP Anti Sm Anti Ro Anti-dsDNA
Behçet’s disease +/- +/- +/- medium and large joints Recurrent and usually painful mucocutaneous ulcers, acneiform lesions, papulo-vesiculo-pustular eruptions, superficial thrombophlebitis Male dominancy
Systemic lupus erythematosus[1] + + + Small joints ↑ ↑ ↑ + Malar rash and photosensitivity
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)[2] + + + + Small and large joints ↑↑ ↑↑ + Subcutaneous nodules Erosive arthropathy
Rhupus[3] + + + + Small and large joints ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ + Malar rash and photosensitivity Erosive arthropathy
Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)[4] + Small and large joints ↑↑ ↑ + Cutaneous eruptions, gottron’s papules, photodistributed erythema, poikiloderma, and calcinosis cutis Overlapping features of SLE, systemic sclerosis (SSc), and polymyositis (PM) that lead to more than one diagnosis
Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD)[5] + Lower extremity ↑ ↑ ↑ + Erythematous macules, patches, or papules with delicate scale Multiple connective tissue diseases with no enough criteria for a single diagnosis
Systemic sclerosis (SSc)[6] +/- + + +/- Lower extremity ↑↑ ↑ ↑ + Hyperkeratosis, edema, and erythema Sclerodactyly, Telangiectasias, Calcinosis, Malignant hypertension, acute renal failure
Sjögren’s syndrome[7] +/- +/- Lower extremity, axiallary creases ↑ ↑ ↑ Xerosis, scaly skin, annular erythema Keratoconjunctivitis sicca
Vasculitis Giant cell[8] + + Distal extremity Rare Involvement of cranial branches of arteries, visual loss
Takayasu[9] +/- +/- Transient extremity Erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum Absent or weak peripheral pulse
Poly-arteritis nodosa[10] +/- General and mild Tender erythematous nodules, purpura, livedo reticularis, bullous or vesicular eruption Testicular pain or tenderness and neuropathies
Kikuchi’s disease[11] +/- medium and large joints ↑/↓ Transient skin rashes, malar rash, erythematous macules, patches, papules, or plaques May be associated with SLE
Serum sickness[12] + + +/- General Pruritic rash, urticaria and/or serpiginous macular rash Self-limited
Psoriatic arthritis[13] Small and large joints Psoriasis and onychodystrophy Dactylitis (sausage digits)
Human parvovirus B19 infection[14] + + Small joints Erythematous rashes Rare in adults, fifth’s disease in children

Behçet’s disease oral lesions must be differentiated from other mouth lesions such as oral candidiasis and aphthous ulcer

Disease Presentation Risk Factors Diagnosis Affected Organ Systems Important features Picture
Diseases predominantly affecting the oral cavity
Oral Candidiasis
  • Denture users
  • As a side effect of medication, most commonly having taken antibiotics. Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of lung conditions (e.g, asthma or COPD) may also result in oral candidiasis which may be reduced by regularly rinsing the mouth with water after taking the medication.
  • Clinical diagnosis
  • Confirmatory tests rarely needed
Localized candidiasis

Invasive candidasis

Tongue infected with oral candidiasis – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=11717223.jpg
Herpes simplex oral lesions
  • Stress
  • Recent URTI
  • Female sex
  • The symptoms of primary HSV infection generally resolve within two weeks
Oral herpes simplex infection – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=19051042.jpg
Aphthous ulcers
  • Painful, red spot or bump that develops into an open ulcer
  • Physical examination
  • Diagnosis of exclusion
  • Oral cavity
  • Self-limiting , Pain decreases in 7 to 10 days, with complete healing in 1 to 3 weeks
By Ebarruda – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=7903358
Squamous cell carcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma – By Luca Pastore, Maria Luisa Fiorella, Raffaele Fiorella, Lorenzo Lo Muzio – http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/showImageLarge.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0050212.g001, CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15252632
Leukoplakia
  • Vulvar lesions occur independent of oral lesions
Leukoplakia – By Aitor III – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9873087
Melanoma
Oral melanoma – By Emmanouil K Symvoulakis, Dionysios E Kyrmizakis, Emmanouil I Drivas, Anastassios V Koutsopoulos, Stylianos G Malandrakis, Charalambos E Skoulakis and John G Bizakis – Symvoulakis et al. Head & Face Medicine 2006 2:7 doi:10.1186/1746-160X-2-7 (Open Access), [1], CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9839811
Fordyce spots
Fordyce spots – Por Perene – Obra do prĂłprio, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=19772899
Burning mouth syndrome
Torus palatinus
Torus palatinus – By Photo taken by dozenist, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=846591
Diseases involving oral cavity and other organ systems
Behcet’s disease
Behcet’s disease – By Ahmet Altiner MD, Rajni Mandal MD – http://dermatology.cdlib.org/1611/articles/18_2009-10-20/2.jpg, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17863021
Crohn’s disease
Agranulocytosis
Syphilis[17]
oral syphilis – By CDC/Susan Lindsley – http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20021114/34/PHIL_2385_lores.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2134349
Coxsackie virus
  • Symptomatic treatment
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
Chicken pox
Chickenpox – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=52872565
Measles
  • Unvaccinated individuals[18][19]
  • Crowded and/or unsanitary conditions
  • Traveling to less developed and developing countries
  • Immunocompromized
  • Winter and spring seasons
  • Born after 1956 and never fully vaccinated
  • Health care workers
Koplick spots (Measles) – By CDC – http://phil.cdc.gov/PHIL_Images/20040908/4f54ee8f0e5f49f58aaa30c1bc6413ba/6111_lores.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=824483

References

  1. ↑ Ehmke TA, Cherian JJ, Wu ES, Jauregui JJ, Banerjee S, Mont MA (2014). “Treatment of osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review”. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 16 (9): 441. doi:10.1007/s11926-014-0441-8. PMID 25074031.
  2. ↑ Lee DM, Weinblatt ME (2001). “Rheumatoid arthritis”. Lancet. 358 (9285): 903–11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06075-5. PMID 11567728.
  3. ↑ Panush RS, Edwards NL, Longley S, Webster E (1988). “Rhupus’ syndrome”. Arch. Intern. Med. 148 (7): 1633–6. PMID 3382309.
  4. ↑ Cappelli S, Bellando Randone S, Martinović D, Tamas MM, Pasalić K, Allanore Y, Mosca M, Talarico R, Opris D, Kiss CG, Tausche AK, Cardarelli S, Riccieri V, Koneva O, Cuomo G, Becker MO, Sulli A, Guiducci S, Radić M, Bombardieri S, Aringer M, Cozzi F, Valesini G, Ananyeva L, Valentini G, Riemekasten G, Cutolo M, Ionescu R, CzirjĂĄk L, Damjanov N, Rednic S, Matucci Cerinic M (2012). “To be or not to be,” ten years after: evidence for mixed connective tissue disease as a distinct entity”. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 41 (4): 589–98. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.010. PMID 21959290.
  5. ↑ AlarcĂłn GS, Williams GV, Singer JZ, Steen VD, Clegg DO, Paulus HE, Billingsley LM, Luggen ME, Polisson RP, Willkens RF (1991). “Early undifferentiated connective tissue disease. I. Early clinical manifestation in a large cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue diseases compared with cohorts of well established connective tissue disease”. J. Rheumatol. 18 (9): 1332–9. PMID 1757934.
  6. ↑ LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA, Rowell N, Wollheim F (1988). “Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis”. J. Rheumatol. 15 (2): 202–5. PMID 3361530.
  7. ↑ Roguedas AM, Misery L, Sassolas B, Le Masson G, Pennec YL, Youinou P (2004). “Cutaneous manifestations of primary SjĂśgren’s syndrome are underestimated”. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 22 (5): 632–6. PMID 15485020.
  8. ↑ Bablekos GD, Michaelides SA, Karachalios GN, Nicolaou IN, Batistatou AK, Charalabopoulos KA (2006). “Pericardial involvement as an atypical manifestation of giant cell arteritis: report of a clinical case and literature review”. Am. J. Med. Sci. 332 (4): 198–204. PMID 17031245.
  9. ↑ Lupi-Herrera E, SĂĄnchez-Torres G, Marcushamer J, Mispireta J, Horwitz S, Vela JE (1977). “Takayasu’s arteritis. Clinical study of 107 cases”. Am. Heart J. 93 (1): 94–103. PMID 12655.
  10. ↑ Pagnoux C, Seror R, Henegar C, Mahr A, Cohen P, Le Guern V, Bienvenu B, Mouthon L, Guillevin L (2010). “Clinical features and outcomes in 348 patients with polyarteritis nodosa: a systematic retrospective study of patients diagnosed between 1963 and 2005 and entered into the French Vasculitis Study Group Database”. Arthritis Rheum. 62 (2): 616–26. doi:10.1002/art.27240. PMID 20112401.
  11. ↑ Kucukardali Y, Solmazgul E, Kunter E, Oncul O, Yildirim S, Kaplan M (2007). “Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease: analysis of 244 cases”. Clin. Rheumatol. 26 (1): 50–4. doi:10.1007/s10067-006-0230-5. PMID 16538388.
  12. ↑ Kunnamo I, Kallio P, Pelkonen P, Viander M (1986). “Serum-sickness-like disease is a common cause of acute arthritis in children”. Acta Paediatr Scand. 75 (6): 964–9. PMID 3564980.
  13. ↑ Oriente P, Biondi-Oriente C, Scarpa R (1994). “Psoriatic arthritis. Clinical manifestations”. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 8 (2): 277–94. PMID 8076388.
  14. ↑ Kaufmann J, Buccola JM, Stead W, Rowley C, Wong M, Bates CK (2007). “Secondary symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection in a healthy adult”. J Gen Intern Med. 22 (6): 877–8. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0173-9. PMC 2219874. PMID 17384979.
  15. ↑ Ann M. Gillenwater, Nadarajah Vigneswaran, Hanadi Fatani, Pierre Saintigny & Adel K. El-Naggar (2013). “Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL): a review of an elusive pathologic entity!”. Advances in anatomic pathology. 20 (6): 416–423. doi:10.1097/PAP.0b013e3182a92df1. PMID 24113312. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  16. ↑ Andrès E, Zimmer J, Affenberger S, Federici L, Alt M, Maloisel F. (2006). “Idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis: Update of an old disorder”. Eur J Intern Med. 17 (8): 529–35. Text “pmid 17142169” ignored (help)
  17. ↑ title=”By Internet Archive Book Images [No restrictions], via Wikimedia Commons” href=”https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_manual_of_syphilis_and_the_venereal_diseases%2C_(1900)_(14595882378).jpg
  18. ↑ Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, Hoffman RE (2000). “Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization”. JAMA. 284 (24): 3145–50. PMID 11135778.
  19. ↑ Ratnam S, West R, Gadag V, Williams B, Oates E (1996). “Immunity against measles in school-aged children: implications for measles revaccination strategies”. Can J Public Health. 87 (6): 407–10. PMID 9009400.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Behçet’s Disease from Other Diseases

Differentiating Behçet’s Disease from Other Diseases

Behçet’s syndrome has no single pathognomonic biomarker or histologic feature, making differential diagnosis critical. Because its manifestations overlap with many autoimmune, infectious, and inflammatory conditions, clinicians must rule out these alternatives based on clinical presentation, laboratory, imaging, and histopathologic data .

  • Skin, Mucosal, and Articular Manifestations
    • Oral ulcers: Can mimic recurrent aphthous stomatitis, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, cervical adenitis), pemphigus, lichen planus, relapsing polychondritis, MAGIC syndrome, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or nutritional deficiencies (iron, zinc, folate, vitamins B1, B6, B12).
    • Genital ulcers: May resemble herpes simplex virus infection, sexually transmitted diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, A20 haploinsufficiency, MAGIC syndrome, or mevalonate kinase deficiency.
    • Skin lesions (erythema nodosum): Must be distinguished from bacterial infections (streptococcus, tuberculosis, leprosy, yersiniosis), drug reactions (oral contraceptives, penicillins, sulfonamides), inflammatory bowel disease, Takayasu’s arteritis, sarcoidosis, or malignancy.
    • Arthritis/oligoarthritis: Can overlap with spondyloarthropathies or arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Ocular Manifestations
    • Uveitis: Differential includes infections (herpes viruses, CMV, tuberculosis, syphilis), sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, B27-associated anterior uveitis, and Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome.
  • Vascular Manifestations
    • Deep-vein thrombosis: May mimic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, connective-tissue diseases, myeloproliferative disorders, or inherited thrombophilias.
    • Artery aneurysms: Can be seen in infections, Takayasu’s arteritis, or relapsing polychondritis.
  • Neurologic Manifestations
    • Parenchymal CNS lesions: Must be differentiated from infections (tuberculosis, herpes, listeriosis), multiple sclerosis, sarcoidosis, primary CNS lymphoma, and histiocytosis.
  • Gastrointestinal Manifestations
    • GI ulcerations: Frequently overlap with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, NSAID-induced colitis, and infectious colitis.
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2]Mahda Alihashemi M.D. [3]

Overview

The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 0.12 to 7.5 per 100,000 individuals in the United States. Behçet disease commonly affects young adults 20 to 40 years of age. Males are more commonly affected by Behçet disease than females. Behçet disease usually affects individuals of the Turkish, Asian, and Middle Eastern populations. Middle Eastern and Asian individuals are more likely to develop Behçet disease due to the increased incidence of skin pathergy and HLA-B51 antigen. The male to female ratio ranges from approximately 11 to 1 to 2 to 1. The majority of Behçet disease cases are reported along the ancient silk road (from eastern Asia to the Mediterranean).

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 80 to 370 per 100,000 individuals in Turkey.[1][2]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 13.5 to 20 per 100,000 individuals in Iran, Japan, Korea, China and Saudi Arabia.[1]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 7.1 per 100,000 individuals in Paris, France.[3]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 2.4 per 100,000 individuals in European ancestry.[3]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 34.6 per 100,000 individuals in North African ancestry.[3]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 17.5 per 100,000 individuals in Asian ancestry.[3]
  • The prevalence of Behçet disease is approximately 0.12 to 7.5 per 100,000 individuals in the United States.[4]

Age

  • Behçet disease commonly affects young adults 20 to 40 years of age.[5]

Race

  • Behçet disease usually affects individuals of the Turkish, Asian, and Middle Eastern populations.
  • Middle Eastern and Asian individuals are more likely to develop Behçet disease due to the increased incidence of skin pathergy and HLA-B51 antigen.

Gender

  • Males are more commonly affected by Behçet disease than females. The male to female ratio ranges from approximately 11 to 1 to 2 to 1.

Region

  • The majority of Behçet disease cases are reported along the ancient silk road (from eastern Asia to the Mediterranean).[1]
  • Behçet disease is most common in Turkey.

Neurologic disease

  • Occurs in less than 10 percent of patients with Behçet syndrome in most series.[6][7][8]
  • Males are more commonly affected by neurological Behçet disease than females.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, Inaba G (October 1999). “Behçet’s disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (17): 1284–91. doi:10.1056/NEJM199910213411707. PMID 10528040.
  2. ↑ Sarica-Kucukoglu R, Akdag-Kose A, KayabalI M, Yazganoglu KD, Disci R, Erzengin D; et al. (2006). “Vascular involvement in Behçet’s disease: a retrospective analysis of 2319 cases”. Int J Dermatol. 45 (8): 919–21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02832.x. PMID 16911374.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Mahr A, Belarbi L, Wechsler B, Jeanneret D, Dhote R, Fain O, Lhote F, Ramanoelina J, Coste J, Guillevin L (December 2008). “Population-based prevalence study of Behçet’s disease: differences by ethnic origin and low variation by age at immigration”. Arthritis Rheum. 58 (12): 3951–9. doi:10.1002/art.24149. PMID 19035493.
  4. ↑ Calamia KT, Wilson FC, Icen M, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE, Kremers HM (May 2009). “Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Behçet’s disease in the US: a population-based study”. Arthritis Rheum. 61 (5): 600–4. doi:10.1002/art.24423. PMC 3024036. PMID 19405011.
  5. ↑ Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, Inaba G (October 1999). “Behçet’s disease”. N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (17): 1284–91. doi:10.1056/NEJM199910213411707. PMID 10528040.
  6. ↑ Serdaroğlu P (1998). “Behçet’s disease and the nervous system”. J Neurol. 245 (4): 197–205. PMID 9591220.
  7. ↑ Siva A, Saip S (2009). “The spectrum of nervous system involvement in Behçet’s syndrome and its differential diagnosis”. J Neurol. 256 (4): 513–29. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-0145-6. PMID 19444529.
  8. ↑ Al-Araji A, Kidd DP (2009). “Neuro-Behçet’s disease: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management”. Lancet Neurol. 8 (2): 192–204. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70015-8. PMID 19161910.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2] Dheeraj Makkar, M.D.[3]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of Behcet disease may be occupational, environmental, genetic, and viral. Behçet’s disease can affect people in any age, but the most common age is 20~30 years old. Behçet’s disease is more common in Middle East and Japan then in other race. It is rare in America. Researches demonstrate that the presence of the gene HLA–B51 is a risk factor for Behçet’s disease.

Risk Factors

The underlying cause of Behçet’s disease is not clear. It is suggested that the following factors may be associated with the disease:

  • Genetic predisposition: Researches demonstrate that the presence of the gene HLA–B51 is a risk factor for Behçet’s disease.[1][2]
  • Age: Behçet’s disease can affect people in any age, but the most common age is 20~30 years old.
  • Gender: Behçet’s disease most commonly affects men than women.
  • Race: Behçet’s disease is more common in Middle East and Japan then in other race. It is rare in America.[3]

Risk Factors for Behçet’s Syndrome

  • Geographic and Ethnic Factors

Historically most common along the ancient Silk Road.

Highest prevalence: Turkey (≈420 per 100,000).

Higher prevalence in Middle East, East Asia, and Mediterranean countries compared with Northern Europe or the U.S.

Immigrants from high-prevalence regions carry higher risk than natives in low-prevalence countries, though lower than in their country of origin .

  • Genetic Risk Factors

HLA-B*51: strongest genetic association; carriers are ~6 times more likely to develop Behçet’s syndrome.

Additional associated genes:

ERAP1, IL23R–IL12RB2, STAT4, IL10 (immune regulation, T-cell polarization).

KLRC4 (NK-cell regulation), CCR1–CCR3 (chemotaxis).

TNFAIP3 (A20 haploinsufficiency), MEFV (familial Mediterranean fever gene).

Epigenetics: altered DNA methylation and histone activation in immune cells amplify susceptibility .

  • Demographic Factors

Age:

Mean age at diagnosis ≈30 years.

Most patients present between 15–45 years.

Sex:

Overall incidence similar between men and women.

Men are more likely to have severe forms of the disease, with higher risk of ocular, vascular, and neurologic involvement.

Male sex is associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 4.94) .

Family history: familial aggregation reported, especially in early-onset cases.

  • Environmental and Lifestyle Triggers (not direct causes, but risk enhancers for onset/flares)

Microorganisms: Streptococcus species, HSV-1, bacterial/viral byproducts.

  • Diet: histamine-releasing foods (citrus fruits, nuts, cheese).

Poor oral hygiene.

Psychological stress.

Dysbiosis: gut and salivary microbiome imbalance .

References

  1. ↑ Treudler R, Orfanos CE, Zouboulis CC (1999). “Twenty-eight cases of juvenile-onset Adamantiades-Behçet disease in Germany”. Dermatology. 199 (1): 15–9. doi:10.1159/000018197. PMID 10449951.
  2. ↑ Soy M, Erken E, Konca K, Ozbek S (2000). “Smoking and Behçet’s disease”. Clin Rheumatol. 19 (6): 508–9. PMID 11147770.
  3. ↑ Yazici H, Fresko I, Yurdakul S (2007). “Behçet’s syndrome: disease manifestations, management, and advances in treatment”. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 3 (3): 148–55. doi:10.1038/ncprheum0436. PMID 17334337.

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hamid Qazi, MD, BSc [2] Dheeraj Makkar, M.D.[3]

Overview

The symptoms of Behçet disease usually develop in the second to third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as uveitis, mouth sores, and skin lesions. Common complications of Behçet disease include neuro Behçet, vision loss, and aneurysm. Depending on the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as good. The worst prognoses are associated with retinal vasculitis, leading to blindness; vascular aneurysm formation, with possible rupture; and neuro–Behçet syndrome, which may lead to dementia despite appropriate aggressive treatment.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

.


Natural History

  • Behçet’s is a chronic, relapsing–remitting multisystem vasculitis.
    • Onset: Mean age at diagnosis ≈30 years, with most cases between 15–45 years.
    • Course:
      • Disease activity generally wanes with advancing age.
      • Clinical features often overlap and evolve over time (e.g., mucocutaneous → ocular, vascular, or neurologic involvement).
    • Sex differences: Incidence similar in men and women, but men tend to develop more severe disease.
    • Familial aggregation reported, particularly in early-onset cases

.


  • The symptoms of Behçet disease usually develop in the second to third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as uveitis, mouth sores, and skin lesions.[1]

Complications

  • Ocular Complications

Uveitis in ~50% of patients.

Can lead to vision loss, historically in up to 25% over 10 years before widespread immunosuppressive therapy.

Now reduced to ~13% with modern treatments.

Risk factors: male sex, posterior segment involvement, frequent relapses .

  • Vascular Complications

Behçet’s can affect both veins and arteries.

Venous: Superficial thrombophlebitis, deep-vein thrombosis (15–40%), Budd–Chiari syndrome, cerebral sinus thrombosis.

Arterial: Aneurysms (especially aorta, pulmonary arteries), stenosis, thrombosis.

Cardiac involvement: Valvulitis, myocarditis, coronary arteritis, intracardiac thrombosis, endomyocardial fibrosis.

Vascular Behçet’s is the leading cause of death, mainly due to arterial aneurysms and Budd–Chiari syndrome .

  • Neurologic Complications

Occurs in <30% of patients, either:

Parenchymal (brainstem, mesodiencephalic junction) → headaches, hemiparesis, seizures.

Non-parenchymal (cerebral venous thrombosis).

Associated with progressive disability in relapsing cases.

  • Gastrointestinal Complications

Ulcers throughout the GI tract, resembling inflammatory bowel disease.

Can lead to pain, bleeding, perforation, sometimes requiring surgery

Prognosis

  • Mortality rates:

~5% over 7.7 years and ~9.8% over 20 years of follow-up.

  • Poor prognostic factors:
    • Male sex (hazard ratio 4.94).
    • Arterial involvement (HR 2.51).
    • High frequency of flares (HR 2.37).
  • Disability risks:
    • Neurologic Behçet’s → 25–60% risk of severe disability or death within 7–10 years.
    • Ocular Behçet’s → risk of blindness historically 25%, now closer to 13%.
    • Despite systemic severity, many patients experience decline in activity with age, and treatment advances (e.g., biologics, TNF inhibitors) have improved survival and reduced complications


  • Depending on the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as good.[3]
  • The worst prognoses are associated with retinal vasculitis, leading to blindness; vascular aneurysm formation, with possible rupture; and neuro–Behçet syndrome, which may lead to dementia despite appropriate aggressive treatment.

References

  1. ↑ Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, Inaba G (1999). “Behçet’s disease”. N Engl J Med. 341 (17): 1284–91. doi:10.1056/NEJM199910213411707. PMID 10528040.
  2. ↑ Zouboulis CC, Vaiopoulos G, Marcomichelakis N, Palimeris G, Markidou I, Thouas B; et al. (2003). “Onset signs, clinical course, prognosis, treatment and outcome of adult patients with Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease in Greece”. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 21 (4 Suppl 30): S19–26. PMID 14727454.
  3. ↑ Sota J, Vitale A, Orlando I, Lopalco G, Franceschini R, Fabiani C; et al. (2017). “Auditory involvement in Behcet’s disease: relationship with demographic, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics”. Clin Rheumatol. 36 (2): 445–449. doi:10.1007/s10067-016-3367-x. PMID 27475793.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Primary Prevention| Secondary Prevention | Surgery | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1
External links

Template:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue de:Morbus Behçet he:תסמונת בכצ’ט nl:Ziekte van Behçet


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH