Systemic lupus erythematosus
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2], Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4]
Synonyms and keywords: SLE, Lupus erythematosus, Systemic lupus, Lupus, Disseminated lupus erythematosus, Discoid lupus, Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2] Ayesha A. Khan, MD[3] Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4]
Overview
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can involve almost all body organs. Lupus may be classified into several subtypes according to the clinical features including systemic lupus erythematosus, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, drug-induced lupus, and neonatal lupus. The progression of SLE involves the immune system. Almost all of the pathological manifestations of SLE are due to antibody formation and deposition of immune complexes in different organs of the body. When the immune complexes are formed, they deposit in different body tissues and vessels, which may lead to complement activation and more organ damage. Other factors, including genetic factors, hormonal abnormalities, and environmental factors, also play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE. There are no established causes of systemic lupus erythematosus, but the most potent risk factors in the development of SLE are known to be female sex, HLA genetic mutations, African American, Asian, or non-Causcasian race, ultraviolet light exposure, and previous exposure to certain infections. SLE must be differentiated from other diseases that cause skin rash, and arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and other autoimmune diseases. Worldwide, the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus is 60 per 100,000 persons. SLE can cause numerous flare ups. SLE usually develops in the second and third decades of life, although it can present at any age. SLE usually begins with mild symptoms such as fatigue, fever, and skin rashes. Without treatment, the patient will develop symptoms of end organ damage, which eventually leads to death in most cases. Common complications of systemic lupus erythematosus include dermatitis, nephritis, and arthritis. Most of these complications occur in chronic cases and lead to significant debilitation. The prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus can vary. SLE can range from a benign illness to an extremely rapidly progressive disease that can lead to fulminant organ failure and death. Without treatment, systemic lupus erythematosus results in very high mortality rate. During the mid-20th century, the mortality rate of SLE was reported to be higher than 60%. SLE can be diagnosed based on SLICC criteria. The patient may have a positive history of familial lupus, skin rashes (especially photosensitive skin rashes), arthritis, and fatigue, which may be suggestive of systemic lupus erythematosus. The most common symptoms of SLE include constitutional symptoms such as fatigue, fever, myalgia, and weight changes. Other, organ-specific symptoms mostly occur with disease progression. SLE may show a variety of symptoms in different organs depending on the complications of the disease. The therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is targeted towards controlling disease activity and preventing organ damage. The choice of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) varies based on the severity of the disease and symptoms. Generally, all patients should be treated with hydroxychloroquine. Other pharmacologic medical therapies for SLE include glucocorticoids like oral prednisone or intravenous methylprednisolone, NSAIDs like celecoxib, and immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, or, particularly in severe cases, rituximab. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), if present without the involvement of any other organ system, can be treated with topical corticosteroids. Other organ-related complications of SLE should be treated separately.
Historical perspective
The word “lupus” means wolf in Latin, which refers to the comparison between the bites of wolves and the destructive injuries caused by SLE. The history of lupus erythematosus can be divided into three periods: classical, neoclassical, and modern.[1] The classical period refers to the ancient history, when there was no exact definition of the disease. During the neoclassical lupus era, scientists determined the manifestations of lupus and to define the action of the disease. Modern history focuses on understanding the microscopic features and pathogenesis of SLE.
Classification
SLE may be classified into several subtypes according to clinical features, including: systemic lupus erythematosus, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, drug-induced lupus, and neonatal lupus. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) itself may be classified into several subtypes based on dermatologic manifestations or glomerulonephritis. SLE may be classified according to dermatologic manifestations into 4 subtypes: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE), subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), and intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ICLE). SLE may be classified according to glomerulonephritis into 6 subtypes: minimal mesangial lupus nephritis (class I), mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis (class II), focal lupus nephritis (class III), diffuse lupus nephritis (class IV), lupus membranous nephropathy (class V), and advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis (class VI).
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus involves the immune system. Other factors such as genetic factors, hormonal abnormalities, and environmental factors also play a role. The most important environmental factors involved in the pathogenesis of SLE include ultraviolet (UV) light and certain infections. The most important genes involved in the pathogenesis of SLE include HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, HLA class 3, C1q, and interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 5. The most prominent events involving immune abnormalities relate to persistent activation of B cells and plasma cells that make auto-antibodies during disease progression. Self-antigen dependent activation of autoreactive B cells and CD4 T cells in secondary lymphoid organs, leads to production of pathogenic autoantibodies that, along with inflammatory cytokines, promotes tissue injury in lupus. Antigen-presenting dendritic cells are necessary for adaptive immune cell activation, and contribute to inflammatory cytokine production. Autoantibodies in complexes with autoantibodies contribute to innate immune cell activation and cytokine production. Genetic predisposition is a requisite for aberrant immune system acivation, in the setting of environmental and stochastic events. Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cells; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cells.The disease developmental process begins with the release of microparticles and proinflammatory cytokines from the cells that are undergoing apoptosis. Due to excessive number of cells undergoing apoptosis, the body is unable to clear these microparticles entirely, and they are presented to dendritic cells as antigens. Dendritic cells process these microparticles, mature, and present these as antigens to T-cells. T-cells, microparticles, and proinflammatory cytokines themselves trigger B-cell activation and autoantibody production. As a result, body tissues lose their self-tolerance. The most prominent events involving hormonal abnormalities are due to prolactin and estrogen. On microscopic histopathological analysis, apoptotic keratinocytes, vacuolization of the basement membrane, and dermal mucin deposition are characteristic findings of SLE dermatitis, and active or inactive endocapillary or extracapillary segmental glomerulonephritis are characteristic findings of lupus nephritis.
Causes
There are no established causes for systemic lupus erythematosus. Common causes of systemic lupus erythematosus include genetic predisposition, auto-immune diseases, and use of drugs. Less common causes of systemic lupus erythematosus include environmental factors and exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light.
Differentiating Systemic lupus erythematosus from other diseases
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause skin rash, arthritis, positive autoimmune serology, weight loss, fevers and chronic pain, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and other autoimmune diseases.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Worldwide, the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus is 60 per 100,000 persons. In North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from as low as 1 per 100,000 persons to as high as 20 per 100,000 persons, with an average prevalence of 12 per 100,000 persons. The overall mortality rate of lupus is very high, estimated at approximately 50,000 deaths per 100,000. Women are more commonly affected with systemic lupus erythematosus than men. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare ups are more prevalent in women. Systemic lupus erythematosus is more prevalent in the African and Asian populations.
Risk Factors
The most potent risk factor in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus is being female.[2] Other risk factors include HLA genetic mutations, being African American, Asian, or non-Causcasian, and previous exposure to certain infections.
Screening
According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for systemic lupus erythematosus is not recommended.
Natural history, complications and prognosis
Natural History
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease. SLE involves many flare ups. SLE usually develops in the second and third decades of life, though it can present any age, beginning with mild symptoms such as fatigue, fever, and skin rashes. Without treatment, the patient will develop symptoms of end organ damage, which will eventually lead to death in most patients. The disease’s course can be divided into 4 subcategories: developmental phase, preclinical phase, clinical phase, and comorbid complication phase.
Complications
Common complications of systemic lupus erythematosus include dermatitis, nephritis, and arthritis. Most of these complications occur as part of the chronic activity of the disease, and lead to the debilitating characteristics of the disease.
Prognosis
The prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from a benign illness to an extremely rapid progressive disease that can lead to fulminant organ failure and death. Without treatment, systemic lupus erythematosus will result in a very high mortality rate, with a report of higher than a 60% mortality rate during the mid-20th century. The presence of nephritis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with SLE; SLE is associated with a 10-year mortality of more than 50% among patients with nephritis. The recent increase in survival rate of patients and better prognoses may be due to increased disease recognition with more sensitive diagnostic tests, earlier diagnosis or treatment, the inclusion of milder cases, increasingly judicious therapy, and prompt treatment of complications. Although improvements in SLE diagnosis have led to better prognoses, the mortality rate among SLE patients is still 5 times higher than the normal population.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria
Based on SLICC criteria, to be diagnosed with SLE, the patient should have either at least 4 of 17 criteria, including at least 1 of the 11 clinical criteria and one of the six immunologic criteria (for each criterion, any bullet is considered 1 clinical criteria), or a biopsy-proven nephritis compatible with SLE in the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies.
History and Symptoms
A positive history of familial lupus, skin rashes (especially photosensitive skin rashes), arthritis, and fatigue may be suggestive of systemic lupus erythematosus. The most common symptoms of SLE include constitutional symptoms like fatigue, fever, myalgia, and weight changes. Other organ-specific symptoms mostly occur with disease progression. SLE may show a variety of symptoms in different organs depending on its complications.
Physical Examination
In the earlier stages of the disease, patients appear well, while in the late stages of the disease, patients are clearly ill with multi-organ involvement. The patient may show a wide range of skin manifestations including urticaria, bullous lesions, malar rash, and scarring alopecia. The patient may develop nasal and oral ulcers. Arthritis may lead to a decreased range of motion, joint effusion, and arthralgia. Neurological manifestations including psychosis, cognitive impairment, and hallucinations, may also be present.
Laboratory Findings
Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus include autoantibody elevation of ANA, anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-SM antibody, and antiphospholipid antibodies, and a decrease in complement levels. Nonspecific laboratory findings include mild pancytopenia, elevated levels of creatinine and proteinuria due to renal failure (secondary to nephritis), elevated levels of ESR and CRP as acute phase reactants, decreased level of complements, and positive direct Coombs test.
Imaging Findings
Electrocardiographic findings
The most important and prevalent ECG findings associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) include sinus tachycardia, ST segment changes, and ventricular conduction disturbances. Other ECG findings are related to late complications of SLE and depend on the complication.
X-ray
On X-ray imaging, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be characterized by different features depending on the complications that have occured. The most common characteristic findings of SLE in X-ray include a thumb printing sign in abdominal graphy, blunting of the costophrenic angle due to pleural effusion, cardiomegaly, hepatomegaly, osteoprosis, tenosinovitis, and other manifestations depending on the complications.
CT scan
On abdominal CT scan, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, pancreatic parenchymal enlargement, and ascites. On cardiac CT scan, SLE may be characterized by enhancement of the thickened pericardium. On brain CT scan, SLE may be characterized by brain atrophy, stroke patterns like cortical hypodensity, and increased attenuation of the cortex.
MRI
On abdominal MRI, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be characterized by hepatomegaly, pancreatic parenchymal enlargement, and hypervascularity of mesentery. On cardiac MRI, SLE may be characterized by mitral leaflet thickening, pericardial thickness, and pericardial effusions. On brain MRI, SLE may be characterized by white matter lesions, changes in blood circulation of the brain, and patchy areas of enhancement. On musculoskeletal MRI, SLE may be characterized by intramuscular edema, proliferative tenosynovitis, and bone marrow edema.
Ultrasound and echocardiography
On abdominal ultrasound, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may present with hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, hyperecho-kidney tissue due to nephritis, and, rarely, cholecystitis. On synovial ultrasound, SLE may present with synovial effusions and synovitis. On echocardiography, SLE may present with decreased ejection fraction, cardiac wall motion abnormality, effusion pericarditis, and valve leaflet thickening.
Other imaging findings
One other imaging modality that can be used for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus complications is the double-contrast technique for gastritis evaluation. Another imaging technique that can be helpful in the diagnosis of SLE complications, especially early manifestations, is the technetium-99m scan. The scan can be used in different ways, including bone scintigraphy and bone scans to evaluate early and late bone complications, and for early evaluation of other organ complications including cardiac, hepatobiliary, and pulmonary complications.
Other diagnostic studies
Other diagnostic tests that can be used for diagnosis of complications include a barium swallow for stricture diagnosis, biopsies of the kidneys and the endometrium for further diagnosis of the degree of involvement, paracentesis to evaluate body effusions, and arthrocentesis to differentiate different causes of arthritis.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
The mainstay of therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is controlling disease activity and preventing organ damage. The treatment choice for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) varies based on the severity of the disease and symptoms. Generally, all patients with any type of SLE manifestation should be treated with hydroxychloroquine, regardless of the level of their disease. Other pharmacologic medical therapies for SLE include glucocorticoids like oral prednisone or intravenous methylprednisolone, NSAIDs like celecoxib, and immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, or rituximab, particularly in severe cases. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), if presented separately without any other system involvement, can be treated with topical corticosteroids. Other organ-related complications of SLE should be treated separately.
Surgery
Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Prevention
Primary Prevention
There is no established method for prevention of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Secondary Prevention
Secondary prevention strategies following systemic lupus erythematosus include using aspirin, ACE inhibitors, and statins to reduce atherosclerotic diseases and participating in cancer screenings.
References
- ↑ Blotzer JW (1983). “Systemic lupus erythematosus I: historical aspects”. Md State Med J. 32 (6): 439–41. PMID 6348430.
- ↑ Grimaldi CM (2006). “Sex and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of the sex hormones estrogen and prolactin on the regulation of autoreactive B cells”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 18 (5): 456–61. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000240354.37927.dd. PMID 16896282.
Historical perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [3]
Overview
The word “lupus” means wolf in Latin, as the destructive injuries SLE causes brought to mind wolf bites. The history of lupus erythematosus can be divided into three periods: classical, neoclassical, and modern. The classical period mostly refers to ancient history, when there was no exact definition of the disease. During the neoclassical lupus era, scientists investigated the manifestations of lupus and worked to define the disease’s action. Modern history is mostly focused on a microscopical understanding of the disease and pathogenesis of SLE.
Discovery
The word “lupus” means wolf in Latin, as the destructive injuries SLE causes brought to mind wolf bites. The history of lupus erythematosus can be divided into three periods: classical, neoclassical, and modern.[1] The classical period mostly refers to ancient history, when there was no exact definition of the disease. During the neoclassical lupus era, scientists investigated the manifestations of lupus and worked to define the disease’s action. Modern history is mostly focused on a microscopical understanding of the disease and pathogenesis of SLE.
Classical History
- In ancient times, it was believed that lupus patients could turn into wolves, especially when exposed to sunlight. This false belief was later found to be related to lupus photosensitivity.[2]
- Hippocrates was the first to use the phrase “herpes esthiomenos,” which was a definition for lupus lesions. Thus, Hippocrates is considered the first to have described cutaneous ulceration of the disease.[3][4]
Neoclassical History
- In 1230 A.D., Rogerius Frugardi was the first to describe erosive facial lesions and used the term “lupus” for the first time scientifically.[3]
- In 1530 A.D., Giovanni Manardi used the same pattern of ulceration to describe lower extremity lesions and also called it lupus.
- In the late 18th century, Robert Willan, a British dermatologist, was the first to describe the destructive lesions of the face and nose under the heading of lupus. Lupus willani, which is cutaneous tuberculosis or lupus vulgaris, is named after him.
- In 1833, Laurent Theodore Biett was the first one to describe lupus erythematosus, although he called it “erythema centrifugum.” Later, his student Pierre Louis Alphee Cazenave published his work.[5]
- In 1845, Ferdinand von Hebra described an aggressive skin lesion with tissue destructive characteristics. Later, in 1866, Ferdinand von Hebra used the term “butterfly” to describe what is known as malar rash. He initially named the condition “seborrhea congestiva.”[6]
- In 1851, Cazenave was the first to complete the description of discoid lupus. He called it “lupus erythematosus.”
- In 1872, Kaposi was the first to describe the systemic signs of the disorder, including arthritis, fever, anemia, lymphadenopathy, and weight loss.
- Kaposi and Cazenave were the first ones who clearly distinguished lupus erythematosus from lupus vulgaris or cutaneous tuberculosis, though both diseases coexist in some patients.
- In the late 19th century, Sir William Osler was the first to coin the term “systemic lupus erythematosus.” He discussed systemic complications of “erythema exsudativum multiforme,” including cardiac, pulmonary, and renal problems as well as cutaneous lesions.[6]
- In the late 19th century, Jonathan Hutchinson was the first to describe the photosensitive nature of malar rash.
- In 1902, Sequira and Balean were the first to describe acroasphyxia, or the Raynaud phenomenon, and lupus nephritis.
- In 1908, Alfred Kraus and Carl Bohac were the first to describe pulmonary involvement in lupus.
- In 1923, Emanuel Libman and Benjamin Sacks were the first to describe noninfectious endocarditis due to lupus.[7]
Modern History
- In the early 20th century, George Belote and H.S. Ratner were the first to describe endocarditis of Libman-Sacks as a manifestation of lupus, even without concurrent cutaneous involvement. They changed the common idea of the necessity of cutaneous involvement for the diagnosis of lupus.
- In 1935, Paul Klemperer, George Baehr, and A.D. Pollack were the first to describe wire loop nephritis.
- In 1959, Leonardt, Arnett, and Schulman were the first to describe the familial aggregation of lupus and concordance in monozygotic twins.
- In 1906, Wasserman, while trying to develop a serologic test for syphilis, was the first to describe a complement-fixing antibody that reacted with extracts from bovine hearts. The corresponding antigen was later identified as cardiolipin.[7]
- In 1948, Malcolm Hargraves discovered the lupus erythematosus (LE) cell. He observed two unusual phenomena in several bone marrow preparations while adding serum from patients with lupus erythematosus to bone marrow preparations from normal subjects.[8]
- In 1954, Miescher and Fauconnet observed that absorption of lupus serum with nuclei prevented its ability to induce the LE cell phenomenon, suggesting that a globulin in the serum was reacting with, or destroying, the nuclei.[8]
- In 1954, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic were the first to describe drug-induced lupus erythematosus, which was induced by the antihypertensive drug hydralazine.[9]
- in 1958, George Friou discovered that the substance in the serum of patients with lupus erythematosus that reacted to the nuclei of cells was gamma globulin. He also discovered that the target in the nucleus was the complex of DNA and histones. He described the indirect immunoflourescence test to detect antinuclear antibodies. Autoantibodies like nuclear ribonucleoprotein (nRNP), Smith, Ro, La, and anticardiolipin antibodies were discovered based on his primary work.[9]
- In 1959, the discovery of a lethal kidney disease in Otago Medical School in New Zealand represented a breakthrough in the understanding of lupus. The discovery provided many insights into disease mechanisms in immunopathogenesis of auto-antibody formation, immunologic tolerance, and the development of glomerulonephritis in lupus. The discovery also led to better evaluation of newer therapeutic agents in lupus erythematosus.[4]
- In 1971, the first classification criteria for lupus was established.
- In 1982, the criteria were revised by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) to incorporate new advances in serologic testing (ANA and anti-dsDNA) and improved biostatistical techniques.[4][7]
- In 2012, the Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge in SLE immunology.[4]
Famous cases
- Michael Jackson, had both SLE and vitiligo; diagnosed in 1986, and confirmed by his dermatologist, Arnold Klein, who presented legal documents during court depositions.[10][11]
- Lady Gaga, has been tested borderline positive for SLE;[12] says she hopes to avoid symptoms by maintaining a healthy lifestyle.[13][14][11]
- Selena Gomez, American actress and singer was diagnosed with lupus.[15][11]
- Toni Braxton, hospitalized in Los Angeles in December 2012 because of “minor health issues” related to lupus.[16][11]
- Louisa May Alcott, American author best known for her novel Little Women; has been suggested to have had SLE.[17][11]
- Ferdinand Marcos, former Philippine president; died of SLE complications in 1989.[18][11]
- Hugh Gaitskell, British politician; died of SLE complications in 1963 aged 56.[19][11]
- Donald Byrne, American chess player; died from SLE complications in 1976.[20]
- Lauren Shuler Donner, American movie producer was diagnosed with lupus.[21][11]
- Caroline Dorough-Cochran, died of SLE complications. She was the sister of Howie D. of the Backstreet Boys, who founded the Dorough Lupus Foundation in her memory.[11]
- Pumpuang Duangjan, “queen of Thai country music”, was diagnosed with lupus.[11]
- Juli Furtado, champion professional mountain biker was diagnosed with lupus.[22][11]
- Sophie Howard, British glamour model was diagnosed with lupus.[23][11]
- J Dilla (also known as Jay Dee), hip-hop producer and beat maker; died of SLE complications in 2006.[24][11]
- Teddi King, American singer; died of SLE complications in 1977.[25][11]
- Charles Kuralt, former anchor of CBS Sunday Morning; died of SLE complications in 1997.[26][11]
- Inday Ba (also known as N’Deaye Ba), Swedish-born actress; died from SLE complications at age 32.[27][11]
- Mary Elizabeth McDonough, American actress; believes her SLE to be due to silicone breast implants.[28][11]
- Flannery O’Connor, American fiction writer; died of SLE complications in 1964.[29][11]
- Tim Raines, former major league baseball player was diagnosed with lupus.[30][11]
- Ray Walston, character actor who died of SLE complications in 2001 after a six-year battle with the disease.[31][11]
- Michael Wayne, Hollywood director and producer; part owner of Batjac Productions; son of John Wayne, died of heart failure resulting from SLE complications in 2003.[32][11]
References
- ↑ Blotzer JW (1983). “Systemic lupus erythematosus I: historical aspects”. Md State Med J. 32 (6): 439–41. PMID 6348430.
- ↑ Holubar K (1980). “Terminology and iconography of lupus erythematosus. A historical vignette”. Am J Dermatopathol. 2 (3): 239–42. PMID 7020464.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Karrar A, Ai-Dalaan A (1994). “Systemic lupus erythematosus for general practitioners: a literature review”. J Family Community Med. 1 (1): 19–29. PMC 3437177. PMID 23008531.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Smith CD, Cyr M (1988). “The history of lupus erythematosus. From Hippocrates to Osler”. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 14 (1): 1–14. PMID 3041483.
- ↑ Scofield RH, Oates J (2009). “The place of William Osler in the description of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Am. J. Med. Sci. 338 (5): 409–12. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181acbd71. PMC 2783313. PMID 19826244.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Arnett FC, Shulman LE (1976). “Studies in familial systemic lupus erythematosus”. Medicine (Baltimore). 55 (4): 313–22. PMID 781465.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 MOORE JE, SHULMAN LE, SCOTT JT (1956). “The natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus: an approach to its study through chronic biologic false positive reactors: interim report”. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 68: 59–67, discussion 67–8. PMC 2248934. PMID 13486608.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Hargraves MM (1969). “Discovery of the LE cell and its morphology”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 44 (9): 579–99. PMID 4186059.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 RUSSELL B (1955). “The history of lupus vulgaris: its recognition, nature, treatment and prevention”. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 48 (2): 127–32. PMC 1919015. PMID 14357321.
- ↑ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Michael Jackson. Updated: August 11, 2008.
- ↑ 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 11.12 11.13 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 11.18 11.19 11.20 “View source for Systemic lupus erythematosus – Wikipedia”.
- ↑ Larry King Live interview, CNN, 1 June 2010.
- ↑ “Lady Gaga & Lupus — Larry King Interview”. National Ledger. June 2, 2010. Retrieved June 3, 2010.
- ↑ “Lady Gaga ‘can’t walk,’ postpones shows”. USA Today. February 13, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2013.
- ↑ [1], billboard.com, accessed 9 October 2015
- ↑ “LUPUS FORCES SINGER TONI BRAXTON INTO LA HOSPITAL”. AP. Retrieved 8 December 2012.
- ↑ Hirschhorn N, Greaves IA (2007). “Louisa May Alcott: her mysterious illness”. Perspect. Biol. Med. 50 (2): 243–59. doi:10.1353/pbm.2007.0019. PMID 17468541.
- ↑ Famous Lupus Patient: Ferdinand Marcos. Updated: August 11, 2008.
- ↑ 1963: Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell dies. On This Day, BBC News, 18 January 1963.
- ↑ Cramer, Gary. Former chess coach named to Hall of Fame. Penn State Intercom, 26 September 2002.
- ↑ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Lauren Schuler Donner. Lupus.About.com. Updated: August 28, 2008.
- ↑ “Interview: Juli Furtado mountain biker, aka ‘The Queen’”, 20th June 2013, Aoife Glass, totalwomenscycling.com
- ↑ Angie Davidson interviews top glamour model Sophie Howard, Lupus.org.uk, accessed 21 November 2008
- ↑ J Dilla/Jay Dee, Rap.About.com. Retrieved February 2, 2009.
- ↑ In the Beginning, 1949–1954 — Teddi King. Allaboutjazz.com. Retrieved February 2, 2009.
- ↑ Celebrities with Lupus: Charles Kuralt. Lupus.About.com. Updated: August 11, 2008.
- ↑ A battle with the wolf. Gardner, Anthony. Mail on Sunday, October 10, 2008.
- ↑ Celebrities with Lupus: Mary Elizabeth McDonough. Lupus.About.com. Updated: October 28, 2008.
- ↑ Flannery O’Connor (1925–1964). New Georgia Encyclopedia. Sarah Gordon, Georgia College and State University. Updated 2008-03-21
- ↑ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Tim Raines. Lupus.About.com. Updated: August 28, 2008
- ↑ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Ray Walston. Lupus.About.com. Updated: August 11, 2008.
- ↑ Mclellan, Dennis. Michael Wayne, 68; Producer, Guardian of His Father’s Legacy. Los Angeles Times, April 4, 2003.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3], Kiran Singh, M.D. [4]
Overview
Lupus may be classified into several subtypes according to clinical features, including systemic lupus erythematosus, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, drug-induced lupus, and neonatal lupus. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) itself may be classified into several subtypes based on dermatologic manifestations or glomerulonephritis. SLE may be classified according to dermatologic manifestations into 4 subtypes: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE), subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), and intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ICLE). SLE may be classified according to glomerulonephritis into 6 subtypes: minimal mesangial lupus nephritis (class I), mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis (class II), focal lupus nephritis (class III), diffuse lupus nephritis (class IV), lupus membranous nephropathy (class V), and advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis (class VI).
Classification
Classification of lupus based on clinical characteristics
Lupus may be classified into the following types based on clinical characteristics:[1]
- Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
- Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE)
- Drug-induced lupus
- Neonatal lupus
Classification of SLE based on dermatologic manifestations
SLE may be further classified according to dermatologic manifestations into 4 subtypes:[1][2][3]
- Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE)
- Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE)
- Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE)
- Intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ICLE)
| Subtypes | Manifestation/subclass |
|---|---|
| Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) |
|
| Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) |
|
| Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) |
|
| Intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ICLE) |
|
Classification of SLE based on glomerulonephritis
SLE may be classified according to the degree of glomerulonephritis into 6 subtypes:[4][5][6]
- Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis (class I)
- Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis (class II)
- Focal lupus nephritis (class III)
- Diffuse lupus nephritis (class IV)
- Lupus membranous nephropathy (class V)
- Advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis (class VI)
| Subtype | Manifestation/subclass |
|---|---|
| Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis (class I) |
|
| Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis (class II) |
|
| Focal lupus nephritis (class III) |
|
| Diffuse lupus nephritis (class IV) |
|
| Lupus membranous nephropathy (class V) | |
| Advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis (class VI) |
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lee HJ, Sinha AA (September 2006). “Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: understanding of clinical features, genetic basis, and pathobiology of disease guides therapeutic strategies”. Autoimmunity. 39 (6): 433–44. doi:10.1080/08916930600886851. PMID 17060022.
- ↑ Lin JH, Dutz JP, Sontheimer RD, Werth VP (2007). “Pathophysiology of cutaneous lupus erythematosus”. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 33 (1–2): 85–106. doi:10.1007/s12016-007-0031-x. PMID 18094949.
- ↑ Wallace DJ, Pistiner M, Nessim S, Metzger AL, Klinenberg JR (1992). “Cutaneous lupus erythematosus without systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and laboratory features”. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 21 (4): 221–6. PMID 1570517.
- ↑ Mannik M, Merrill CE, Stamps LD, Wener MH (2003). “Multiple autoantibodies form the glomerular immune deposits in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus”. J. Rheumatol. 30 (7): 1495–504. PMID 12858447.
- ↑ Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, Sebastiani GD, Gil A, Lavilla P, Mejía JC, Aydintug AO, Chwalinska-Sadowska H, de Ramón E, Fernández-Nebro A, Galeazzi M, Valen M, Mathieu A, Houssiau F, Caro N, Alba P, Ramos-Casals M, Ingelmo M, Hughes GR (2003). “Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients”. Medicine (Baltimore). 82 (5): 299–308. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55. PMID 14530779.
- ↑ Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, Balow JE, Bruijn JA, Cook T, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Ginzler EM, Hebert L, Hill G, Hill P, Jennette JC, Kong NC, Lesavre P, Lockshin M, Looi LM, Makino H, Moura LA, Nagata M (2004). “The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited”. Kidney Int. 65 (2): 521–30. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00443.x. PMID 14717922.
- ↑ Lloyd W, Schur PH (1981). “Immune complexes, complement, and anti-DNA in exacerbations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)”. Medicine (Baltimore). 60 (3): 208–17. PMID 7231154.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2], Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4]
Overview
The pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus involves the immune system. Other factors such as genetic factors, hormonal abnormalities, and environmental factors also play a role. The most important environmental factors involved in the pathogenesis of SLE include ultraviolet (UV) light and some infections. The most important genes involved in the pathogenesis of SLE include HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, HLA class 3, C1q, and interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 5. The most prominent events involving immune abnormalities are related to persistent activation of B cells and plasma cells that make auto-antibodies during disease progression. The disease developmental process begins with the release of microparticles and proinflammatory cytokines from the cells that are undergoing apoptosis. Due to excess amount of apoptosis, the body is unable to clear these microparticles entirely, and these microparticles are presented to dendritic cells as antigens. Dendritic cells process these microparticles and mature, and present these as antigens to T-cells. T-cells, microparticles, and proinflammatory cytokines themselves trigger B-cell activation and autoantibody production. As a result, body tissues lose their self-tolerance. The most prominent events involving hormonal abnormalities are due to prolactin and estrogen. On microscopic histopathological analysis, apoptotic keratinocytes, vacuolization of the basement membrane, and dermal mucin deposition are characteristic findings of SLE dermatitis, and active or inactive endocapillary or extracapillary segmental glomerulonephritis are characteristic findings of lupus nephritis.
Pathogenesis
The progression of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) involves the immune system. Nearly all of the pathological manifestations of SLE occur due to antibody formation and the creation and deposition of immune complexes in different organs of the body. When the immune complexes are formed, they deposit on different body tissues and vessels, which may lead to complement activation and more organ damage. There are other factors such as genetic factors, hormonal abnormalities, and environmental factors that also play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE.

Environmental factors
The environmental factors and genetic factors are the most important risk factors for developing SLE because they may jump-start the disinhibited cellular apoptosis chain. This apoptosis step is the first step in the pathogenesis of lupus.
- Infections
- May stimulate some antigen specific cells and increase apoptosis
- May induce anti-DNA antibodies
- May mimic lupus-like symptoms
- Associated with higher risk of SLE
- Associated with triggering the active courses and flare ups of disease in children
- Include:
- Parvovirus B19
- Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
- Trypanosomiasis
- Mycobacterial infections
- SLE flares may follow bacterial infections
- Ultraviolet (UV) light:
- Can stimulate B-cells to produce more antibodies
- May activate macrophages, interfere with antigen processing, and therefore increase the degree of autoimmunity
Immune abnormalities
The development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is due to the activation of different mechanisms that may result in auto-immunity. The disease developmental process begins with the release of microparticles and proinflammatory cytokines from the cells that are undergoing apoptosis. Due to excess amount of apoptosis, the body is unable to clear these microparticles entirely, and these microparticles are presented to dendritic cells as antigens. Dendritic cells process these microparticles and mature, and present these as antigens to T-cells. T-cells, microparticles, and proinflammatory cytokines themselves trigger B-cell activation and autoantibody production. As a result, body tissues lose their self-tolerance. Affected patients are no longer entirely tolerant to all of their self-antigens, leading to development of an autoimmune disease and producing autoantibodies as a response. During disease progression, B cells and plasma cells that make autoantibodies are more persistently activated due to signaling abnormalities, causing them to make more autoantibodies. These autoantibodies are targeted predominantly to intracellular nucleoprotein particles.[1][2] This increase in autoantibody production and persistence is supposed to be downregulated by anti-idiotypic antibodies or regulatory immune cells, but the massive immunologic response in SLE prevents this downregulation from taking place. After formation of immune complexes, the classical complement pathway is activated, which leads to the deposition of immune complexes in different organs and is responsible for flare ups and long term complications. The most important immune abnormalities that are related to SLE development and progression are:
Microparticles
Increased level of microparticles (MPs):[3]
- Microparticles are small, membrane-bound vesicles enclosing DNA, RNA, nuclear proteins, cell adhesion molecules, growth factors, and cytokines
- They are shed from cells during apoptosis or activation
- Microparticles can drive inflammation and autoimmunity by their derivatives
Pro-inflammatory cytokines
Increased expression of specific genetic factors may be associated with promoting autoimmunity. The most important cytokine changes include:[4][3]
- Increased expression of interferon alpha (IFN-α) inducible RNA transcripts by mononuclear cells
- Increased IFN-I production due to increased availability of stimulatory nucleic acids
- May be responsible for SLE chronic characteristics
- Elevated levels of circulating TNF-alpha (expressed by renal tissue in lupus nephritis) correlate with active disease
Signaling abnormalities
Protein kinases are responsible for intracellular cytokine signals. Intracellular signaling leads to various types of cell response, such as:
Cell signaling abnormalities leads to:
- T and B lymphocytes cellular hyperactivity
- T and B lymphocytes hyper responsiveness
- Persistence of auto-reactive T cells that would otherwise have been deleted
Signaling abnormalities of T and B lymphocytes, may be due to:
- Abnormal voltage-gated potassium channels, these channels facilitate excessive calcium entry into T cells and lead to increased calcium responses to antigen stimulation
- Hyperphosphorylation of cytosolic protein substrates
- Decreased nuclear factor kB
B-Cell role
- Increase in circulating plasma cells and memory B cells that are associated with SLE activity
- Polyclonal activation of B cells and abnormal B-cell receptor signaling
- Increase in B cells’ life span
T-Cell role
- Decrease in cytotoxic T cells, decrease in suppressor T cell function, and impaired generation of polyclonal T-cell cytolytic activity
- Increased number and activity of helper T cells
Neutrophil role
- Increased number of circulating neutrophils undergoing NETosis (NET=neutrophil extracellular traps), a form of apoptosis specific for neutrophils, releases DNA bound to protein in protein nets, which stimulates anti-DNA and IFN-alpha production
- Increased neutrophil extracellular trap leads to: [5]
- Thrombus formation
- Increased disease activity and renal disease and thus can be used even as a disease activity marker
- Endothelial cell damage and inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques, which may contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus
Hormonal abnormalities
The following evidence is suggestive of the hormonal predisposition to SLE:
- Predilection of the disease for females shows the relationship between female hormones and the onset of SLE
- Significantly increased risk for SLE in:[6]
- Early age of menarche
- Early age at menopause or surgical menopause
- Women that are treated with estrogen-containing regimens such as oral contraceptives or postmenopausal hormone replacement therapies
Hormones that are related to disease progression include:[7]
Prolactin:
- Stimulates the immune system and is elevated in SLE
Exogenous estrogen
- Including oral contraceptive use and postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: [7][8]
- Stimulates the type 1 IFN pathway
- Stimulates thymocytes, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, B cells, macrophages, and causes the release of certain cytokines (eg, IL-1)
- Prompt maturation of B cells, especially those that have a high affinity to anti-DNA antibodies by decreasing the apoptosis of self-reactive B-cells[9]
- Stimulate expression of HLA and endothelial cell adhesion molecules (VCAM, ICAM)
- Increases macrophage proto-oncogene expression
- Enhanced adhesion of peripheral mononuclear cells to endothelium
Progesterone:
- May inhibit the type 1 interferon pathway, suggesting that a balance between estrogen and progesterone may be critical for the body to remain healthy
- Both progesterone and high levels of estrogen promote a Th2 response, which favors auto-antibody production
Genetics
Systemic lupus erythematosus is transmitted in a polygenic inheritance pattern. Genes involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus include HLA class 2 (especially DR2 and DR3), HLA class 3 (especially complement genes including C2 and C4 genes), IFNRF5 gene, and other genes related to the immunologic system. The following evidence is also suggestive of the genetic predisposition of SLE:[10]
- Increase occurrence of disease in identical twins
- Increased disease frequency among first degree relatives
- The increased occurrence of the disease in siblings of SLE patients
| Class | Gene subtype | Function | Pathological effect and Molecular mechanisms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autoantigen presentation | HLA class 2[11] |
|
|
| Immune complex dependent response | HLA class 3[12] |
|
|
| C1q genes[12] |
|
| |
| Innate response | Interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 5[13] |
|
|
| STAT4[14][15][16][17] |
|
| |
| The IRAK1–MECP2 region |
|
| |
| FcγR genes[18] |
|
| |
| Cell apoptosis regulators | TREX1 |
|
|
| IL-10 |
|
||
| IFNα regulators | TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 |
| |
| PHRF1 |
|
| |
| Regulators of Lymphocytes | TNFSF4 |
| |
| BLK[19] |
|
| |
| PTPN22[20] |
|
| |
| BANK1[21][22] |
|
| |
| LYN[23] | |||
| ETS1[24][25] |
|
| |
| IKZF1[26] |
|
| |
| Genes involved in immune complex clearance | ITGAM[25] |
|
|
Associated Conditions
- Homozygous deficiencies of the components of complement, especially C1q, are associated with developing immunologic diseases, particularly SLE or a lupus-like disease.[27]
- The FcγRIIA polymorphism has been associated with nephritis in African Americans, Koreans, and Hispanics. Both FcgammaRIIa and FcgammaRIIIa have low binding alleles that confer risk for SLE and may act in the pathogenesis of disease. [28]
- Women treated with estrogen-containing regimens such as oral contraceptives or postmenopausal hormone replacement therapies are more predisposed to SLE.
- Annular or psoriasiform skin lesions are associated with anti-Ro (SS-A) and anti-La (SS-B) antibodies.
- Anti-Ro, anti-La, anti sm, and anti RNP antibodies have been associated with mucocutaneous involvement and less severe nephropathy.
Gross Pathology
On gross pathology the most important characteristic findings are:
- Kidney: Bilateral pallor and hypertrophy
- Brain: Infarct regions and hemorrhages
- Heart: Cardiomegaly and valvular vegetation
- Lung: Peural fibrosis and pleural effusion
Microscopic Pathology
On microscopic histopathological analysis, lupus erythematosus (LE) cells can be seen in SLE. LE cells are neutrophils that have engulfed an intact nucleus. LE cells are also known as LE bodies.
On microscopic histopathological analysis, apoptotic keratinocytes, vacuolization of the basement membrane, and dermal mucin deposition are characteristic findings of SLE dermatitis, and active or inactive endocapillary or extracapillary segmental glomerulonephritis are characteristic findings of SLE nephritis. Microscopic findings in systemic lupus erythematosus are based on the involved organ system.
Skin histopathology
Common shared histopathologic features among all different subtypes of cutaneous lupus include:
- Hyperkeratosis
- Epidermal atrophy
- Dermal mucin deposition
- Liquefactive degeneration of the basal layer of the epidermis and vacuolization
- Thickening of the basement membrane
- Pigment incontinence
- Mononuclear cell infiltration at dermo-epidermal junction
- Superficial, perivascular, and perifollicular areas (due to mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltrate)
| SLE dermatitis subtype | Specific microscopic findings | Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus |
|
![]() |
| Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus |
| |
| Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus |
|
Glomerulonephritis histopathology
| Class | SLE nephritis subtype | Light microscopy findings | Light microscopy previews | Electron microscopy/Immunofluorescence findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis | – |
| |
| II | Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis |
|
![]() |
|
| III | Focal lupus nephritis |
|
![]() |
|
| IV | Diffuse lupus nephritis |
|
![]() |
|
| V | Lupus membranous nephropathy |
|
| |
| VI | Advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis | ![]() |
|
Synovial histopathology
- Nonspecific histopathologic findings
- Superficial fibrin-like material
- Local or diffuse synovial cell lining proliferation
- Vascular changes:
- Perivascular mononuclear cells
- Lumen obliteration
- Enlarged endothelial cells
- Thrombi
Mucosal histopathology
- Hyperkeratosis
- Atrophy of rete processes
- Superficial and deep inflammatory infiltrates
- Edema in the lamina propria
- Continuous or patchy periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive deposits in the basement membrane zone
- Deposition of intercellular mucin
- Deposition of immunoglobulin and complement at the dermal-epidermal junction
Lupus nephritis histopathology
{{#ev:youtube|Tw07BFaDEo0}}
References
- ↑ Elkon K (1995). “Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 7 (5): 384–8. PMID 8519610.
- ↑ Yaniv G, Twig G, Shor DB, Furer A, Sherer Y, Mozes O, Komisar O, Slonimsky E, Klang E, Lotan E, Welt M, Marai I, Shina A, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y (2015). “A volcanic explosion of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a diversity of 180 different antibodies found in SLE patients”. Autoimmun Rev. 14 (1): 75–9. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.003. PMID 25449682.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Dye JR, Ullal AJ, Pisetsky DS (2013). “The role of microparticles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus”. Scand. J. Immunol. 78 (2): 140–8. doi:10.1111/sji.12068. PMID 23672591.
- ↑ Kirou KA, Lee C, George S, Louca K, Papagiannis IG, Peterson MG, Ly N, Woodward RN, Fry KE, Lau AY, Prentice JG, Wohlgemuth JG, Crow MK (2004). “Coordinate overexpression of interferon-alpha-induced genes in systemic lupus erythematosus”. Arthritis Rheum. 50 (12): 3958–67. doi:10.1002/art.20798. PMID 15593221.
- ↑ Barnado A, Crofford LJ, Oates JC (2016). “At the Bedside: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as targets for biomarkers and therapies in autoimmune diseases”. J. Leukoc. Biol. 99 (2): 265–78. doi:10.1189/jlb.5BT0615-234R. PMID 26658004.
- ↑ Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Karlson EW (2007). “Reproductive and menopausal factors and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in women”. Arthritis Rheum. 56 (4): 1251–62. doi:10.1002/art.22510. PMID 17393454.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Lahita RG (1999). “The role of sex hormones in systemic lupus erythematosus”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 11 (5): 352–6. PMID 10503654.
- ↑ Hughes GC, Choubey D (2014). “Modulation of autoimmune rheumatic diseases by oestrogen and progesterone”. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 10 (12): 740–51. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.144. PMID 25155581.
- ↑ Cohen-Solal JF, Jeganathan V, Grimaldi CM, Peeva E, Diamond B (2006). “Sex hormones and SLE: influencing the fate of autoreactive B cells”. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 305: 67–88. PMID 16724801.
- ↑ Sullivan KE (2000). “Genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical implications”. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 26 (2): 229–56, v–vi. PMID 10768211.
- ↑ Lee HS, Chung YH, Kim TG, Kim TH, Jun JB, Jung S, Bae SC, Yoo DH (2003). “Independent association of HLA-DR and FCgamma receptor polymorphisms in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus”. Rheumatology (Oxford). 42 (12): 1501–7. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg404. PMID 12867584.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Pickering MC, Botto M, Taylor PR, Lachmann PJ, Walport MJ (2000). “Systemic lupus erythematosus, complement deficiency, and apoptosis”. Adv. Immunol. 76: 227–324. PMID 11079100.
- ↑ Löfgren SE, Yin H, Delgado-Vega AM, Sanchez E, Lewén S, Pons-Estel BA, Witte T, D’Alfonso S, Ortego-Centeno N, Martin J, Alarcón-Riquelme ME, Kozyrev SV (2010). “Promoter insertion/deletion in the IRF5 gene is highly associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in distinct populations, but exerts a modest effect on gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells”. J. Rheumatol. 37 (3): 574–8. doi:10.3899/jrheum.090440. PMID 20080916.
- ↑ Sigurdsson S, Nordmark G, Garnier S, Grundberg E, Kwan T, Nilsson O, Eloranta ML, Gunnarsson I, Svenungsson E, Sturfelt G, Bengtsson AA, Jönsen A, Truedsson L, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S, Eriksson C, Alm G, Göring HH, Pastinen T, Syvänen AC, Rönnblom L (2008). “A risk haplotype of STAT4 for systemic lupus erythematosus is over-expressed, correlates with anti-dsDNA and shows additive effects with two risk alleles of IRF5”. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17 (18): 2868–76. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn184. PMC 2525501. PMID 18579578.
- ↑ Kariuki SN, Kirou KA, MacDermott EJ, Barillas-Arias L, Crow MK, Niewold TB (2009). “Cutting edge: autoimmune disease risk variant of STAT4 confers increased sensitivity to IFN-alpha in lupus patients in vivo”. J. Immunol. 182 (1): 34–8. PMC 2716754. PMID 19109131.
- ↑ Taylor KE, Remmers EF, Lee AT, Ortmann WA, Plenge RM, Tian C, Chung SA, Nititham J, Hom G, Kao AH, Demirci FY, Kamboh MI, Petri M, Manzi S, Kastner DL, Seldin MF, Gregersen PK, Behrens TW, Criswell LA (2008). “Specificity of the STAT4 genetic association for severe disease manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus”. PLoS Genet. 4 (5): e1000084. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000084. PMC 2377340. PMID 18516230.
- ↑ Kawasaki A, Ito I, Hikami K, Ohashi J, Hayashi T, Goto D, Matsumoto I, Ito S, Tsutsumi A, Koga M, Arinami T, Graham RR, Hom G, Takasaki Y, Hashimoto H, Behrens TW, Sumida T, Tsuchiya N (2008). “Role of STAT4 polymorphisms in systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population: a case-control association study of the STAT1-STAT4 region”. Arthritis Res. Ther. 10 (5): R113. doi:10.1186/ar2516. PMC 2592800. PMID 18803832.
- ↑ Yap SN, Phipps ME, Manivasagar M, Tan SY, Bosco JJ (1999). “Human Fc gamma receptor IIA (FcgammaRIIA) genotyping and association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Chinese and Malays in Malaysia”. Lupus. 8 (4): 305–10. doi:10.1191/096120399678847876. PMID 10413210.
- ↑ Ito I, Kawasaki A, Ito S, Hayashi T, Goto D, Matsumoto I, Tsutsumi A, Hom G, Graham RR, Takasaki Y, Hashimoto H, Ohashi J, Behrens TW, Sumida T, Tsuchiya N (2009). “Replication of the association between the C8orf13-BLK region and systemic lupus erythematosus in a Japanese population”. Arthritis Rheum. 60 (2): 553–8. doi:10.1002/art.24246. PMID 19180478.
- ↑ Gregersen PK, Olsson LM (2009). “Recent advances in the genetics of autoimmune disease”. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27: 363–91. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132653. PMC 2992886. PMID 19302045.
- ↑ Yokoyama K, Su Ih IH, Tezuka T, Yasuda T, Mikoshiba K, Tarakhovsky A, Yamamoto T (2002). “BANK regulates BCR-induced calcium mobilization by promoting tyrosine phosphorylation of IP(3) receptor”. EMBO J. 21 (1–2): 83–92. doi:10.1093/emboj/21.1.83. PMC 125810. PMID 11782428.
- ↑ Kozyrev SV, Abelson AK, Wojcik J, Zaghlool A, Linga Reddy MV, Sanchez E, Gunnarsson I, Svenungsson E, Sturfelt G, Jönsen A, Truedsson L, Pons-Estel BA, Witte T, D’Alfonso S, Barizzone N, Barrizzone N, Danieli MG, Gutierrez C, Suarez A, Junker P, Laustrup H, González-Escribano MF, Martin J, Abderrahim H, Alarcón-Riquelme ME (2008). “Functional variants in the B-cell gene BANK1 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus”. Nat. Genet. 40 (2): 211–6. doi:10.1038/ng.79. PMID 18204447.
- ↑ Harley JB, Alarcón-Riquelme ME, Criswell LA, Jacob CO, Kimberly RP, Moser KL, Tsao BP, Vyse TJ, Langefeld CD, Nath SK, Guthridge JM, Cobb BL, Mirel DB, Marion MC, Williams AH, Divers J, Wang W, Frank SG, Namjou B, Gabriel SB, Lee AT, Gregersen PK, Behrens TW, Taylor KE, Fernando M, Zidovetzki R, Gaffney PM, Edberg JC, Rioux JD, Ojwang JO, James JA, Merrill JT, Gilkeson GS, Seldin MF, Yin H, Baechler EC, Li QZ, Wakeland EK, Bruner GR, Kaufman KM, Kelly JA (2008). “Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci”. Nat. Genet. 40 (2): 204–10. doi:10.1038/ng.81. PMC 3712260. PMID 18204446.
- ↑ Moisan J, Grenningloh R, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Ho IC (2007). “Ets-1 is a negative regulator of Th17 differentiation”. J. Exp. Med. 204 (12): 2825–35. doi:10.1084/jem.20070994. PMC 2118518. PMID 17967903.
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 Gateva V, Sandling JK, Hom G, Taylor KE, Chung SA, Sun X, Ortmann W, Kosoy R, Ferreira RC, Nordmark G, Gunnarsson I, Svenungsson E, Padyukov L, Sturfelt G, Jönsen A, Bengtsson AA, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S, Baechler EC, Brown EE, Alarcón GS, Edberg JC, Ramsey-Goldman R, McGwin G, Reveille JD, Vilá LM, Kimberly RP, Manzi S, Petri MA, Lee A, Gregersen PK, Seldin MF, Rönnblom L, Criswell LA, Syvänen AC, Behrens TW, Graham RR (2009). “A large-scale replication study identifies TNIP1, PRDM1, JAZF1, UHRF1BP1 and IL10 as risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus”. Nat. Genet. 41 (11): 1228–33. doi:10.1038/ng.468. PMC 2925843. PMID 19838195.
- ↑ Wojcik H, Griffiths E, Staggs S, Hagman J, Winandy S (2007). “Expression of a non-DNA-binding Ikaros isoform exclusively in B cells leads to autoimmunity but not leukemogenesis”. Eur. J. Immunol. 37 (4): 1022–32. doi:10.1002/eji.200637026. PMID 17357110.
- ↑ Petry F, Botto M, Holtappels R, Walport MJ, Loos M (2001). “Reconstitution of the complement function in C1q-deficient (C1qa-/-) mice with wild-type bone marrow cells”. J. Immunol. 167 (7): 4033–7. PMID 11564823.
- ↑ Li R, Peng H, Chen GM, Feng CC, Zhang YJ, Wen PF, Qiu LJ, Leng RX, Pan HF, Ye DQ (2014). “Association of FCGR2A-R/H131 polymorphism with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus among Asian population: a meta-analysis of 20 studies”. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 306 (9): 781–91. doi:10.1007/s00403-014-1483-5. PMID 24997134.
- ↑ Sepehr A, Wenson S, Tahan SR (2010). “Histopathologic manifestations of systemic diseases: the example of cutaneous lupus erythematosus”. J. Cutan. Pathol. 37 Suppl 1: 112–24. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01510.x. PMID 20482683.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2] Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]
Overview
There are no established direct causes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Common contributory factors in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus include genetic predisposition, auto-immune diseases, and use of drugs. Less common factors include environmental factors and exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light.
Causes
- Genetic predisposition:[1]
- HLA class polymorphism
- Complement genes
- Female sexual gene due to high levels of estrogen and prolactin
- Auto-immune disease[2]
- Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light[3]
- Can exacerbate or induce systemic manifestations of SLE
- Drug-induced lupus
References
- ↑ Schur PH (1995). “Genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Lupus. 4 (6): 425–37. doi:10.1177/096120339500400603. PMID 8749564.
- ↑ Cutolo M, Sulli A, Seriolo B, Accardo S, Masi AT (1995). “Estrogens, the immune response and autoimmunity”. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 13 (2): 217–26. PMID 7656468.
- ↑ Cooper GS, Dooley MA, Treadwell EL, St Clair EW, Gilkeson GS (2002). “Risk factors for development of systemic lupus erythematosus: allergies, infections, and family history”. J Clin Epidemiol. 55 (10): 982–9. PMID 12464374.
Differentiating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2]
Overview
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause skin rash, arthritis, positive autoimmune serology, weight loss, fevers and chronic pain, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and other autoimmune diseases.
Differentiating systemic lupus erythematosus from other diseases
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) must be differentiated from other diseases that cause skin rash, arthritis, positive autoimmune serology, weight loss, fevers and chronic pain, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and other autoimmune diseases.
Abbreviations:
ANA: Antinuclear antibody, RF: Rheumatoid factor, Anti-CCp: Anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody, Anti U1RNP: Anti-U1 ribonucleoprotein antibodies, Anti Sm: Anti-Sm antibodies, Anti Ro: Anti Ro antibody also called anti-Sjögren’s-syndrome-related antigen A antibody, Anti-dsDNA: Anti-double stranded DNA.
(Up arrows represent higher amounts and down arrows represent lower amounts)
| Disease | Arthritis | Auto-antibodies | Raynaud phenomenon | Rash pattern | Distinguishing/specific features | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyarthritis | Tenderness | Edema | Deformity /Erosion | Pattern | ANA | RF | Anti-CCp | Anti U1RNP | Anti Sm | Anti Ro | Anti-dsDNA | |||||
| Systemic lupus erythematosus[1] | + | + | + | – | Small joints | ↑ | – | – | – | ↑ | ↑ | – | + | Malar rash and photosensitivity | ||
| Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)[2] | + | + | + | + | Small and large joints | – | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | – | – | – | – | + | Subcutaneous nodules | Erosive arthropathy | |
| Rhupus[3] | + | + | + | + | Small and large joints | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | – | ↑ | + | Malar rash and photosensitivity | Erosive arthropathy | |
| Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)[4] | – | – | – | + | Small and large joints | – | ↑↑ | ↑ | – | – | – | – | + | Cutaneous eruptions, Gottron’s papules, photodistributed erythema, poikiloderma, and calcinosis cutis | Overlapping features of SLE, systemic sclerosis (SSc), and polymyositis (PM) that lead to more than one diagnosis | |
| Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD)[5] | + | – | – | – | Lower extremity | ↑ | ↑ | – | – | ↑ | – | – | + | Erythematous macules, patches, or papules with delicate scale | Multiple connective tissue diseases with no enough criteria for a single diagnosis | |
| Systemic sclerosis (SSc)[6] | +/- | + | + | +/- | Lower extremity | ↑↑ | – | – | – | ↑ | – | ↑ | + | Hyperkeratosis, edema, and erythema | Sclerodactyly, Telangiectasias, Calcinosis, Malignant hypertension, acute renal failure | |
| Sjögren’s syndrome[7] | +/- | +/- | – | – | Lower extremity, axiallary creases | ↑ | – | – | – | ↑ | ↑ | – | – | Xerosis, scaly skin, annular erythema | Keratoconjunctivitis sicca | |
| Vasculitis | Temporal arteritis[8] | – | + | + | – | Distal extremity | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Rare | Involvement of cranial branches of arteries, visual loss |
| Takayasu[9] | – | +/- | +/- | – | Transient extremity | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum | Absent or weak peripheral pulse | ||
| Poly-arteritis nodosa[10] | – | +/- | – | – | General and mild | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Tender erythematous nodules, purpura, livedo reticularis, bullous or vesicular eruption | Testicular pain or tenderness and neuropathies | ||
| Behçet’s syndrome[11] | +/- | +/- | +/- | – | medium and large joints | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Recurrent and usually painful mucocutaneous ulcers, acneiform lesions, papulo-vesiculo-pustular eruptions, superficial thrombophlebitis | Male dominancy | |
| Kikuchi’s disease[12] | – | +/- | – | – | medium and large joints | ↑/↓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Transient skin rashes, malar rash, erythematous macules, patches, papules, or plaques | May be associated with SLE | |
| Serum sickness[13] | + | + | +/- | – | General | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Pruritic rash, urticaria and/or serpiginous macular rash | Self-limited | |
| Psoriatic arthritis[14] | – | – | – | – | Small and large joints | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Psoriasis and onychodystrophy | Dactylitis (sausage digits) | |
| Human parvovirus B19 infection[15] | + | + | – | – | Small joints | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Erythematous rashes | Rare in adults, fifth’s disease in children | |
References
- ↑ Ehmke TA, Cherian JJ, Wu ES, Jauregui JJ, Banerjee S, Mont MA (2014). “Treatment of osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review”. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 16 (9): 441. doi:10.1007/s11926-014-0441-8. PMID 25074031.
- ↑ Lee DM, Weinblatt ME (2001). “Rheumatoid arthritis”. Lancet. 358 (9285): 903–11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06075-5. PMID 11567728.
- ↑ Panush RS, Edwards NL, Longley S, Webster E (1988). “‘Rhupus’ syndrome”. Arch. Intern. Med. 148 (7): 1633–6. PMID 3382309.
- ↑ Cappelli S, Bellando Randone S, Martinović D, Tamas MM, Pasalić K, Allanore Y, Mosca M, Talarico R, Opris D, Kiss CG, Tausche AK, Cardarelli S, Riccieri V, Koneva O, Cuomo G, Becker MO, Sulli A, Guiducci S, Radić M, Bombardieri S, Aringer M, Cozzi F, Valesini G, Ananyeva L, Valentini G, Riemekasten G, Cutolo M, Ionescu R, Czirják L, Damjanov N, Rednic S, Matucci Cerinic M (2012). ““To be or not to be,” ten years after: evidence for mixed connective tissue disease as a distinct entity”. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 41 (4): 589–98. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.010. PMID 21959290.
- ↑ Alarcón GS, Williams GV, Singer JZ, Steen VD, Clegg DO, Paulus HE, Billingsley LM, Luggen ME, Polisson RP, Willkens RF (1991). “Early undifferentiated connective tissue disease. I. Early clinical manifestation in a large cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue diseases compared with cohorts of well established connective tissue disease”. J. Rheumatol. 18 (9): 1332–9. PMID 1757934.
- ↑ LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA, Rowell N, Wollheim F (1988). “Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis”. J. Rheumatol. 15 (2): 202–5. PMID 3361530.
- ↑ Roguedas AM, Misery L, Sassolas B, Le Masson G, Pennec YL, Youinou P (2004). “Cutaneous manifestations of primary Sjögren’s syndrome are underestimated”. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 22 (5): 632–6. PMID 15485020.
- ↑ Bablekos GD, Michaelides SA, Karachalios GN, Nicolaou IN, Batistatou AK, Charalabopoulos KA (2006). “Pericardial involvement as an atypical manifestation of giant cell arteritis: report of a clinical case and literature review”. Am. J. Med. Sci. 332 (4): 198–204. PMID 17031245.
- ↑ Lupi-Herrera E, Sánchez-Torres G, Marcushamer J, Mispireta J, Horwitz S, Vela JE (1977). “Takayasu’s arteritis. Clinical study of 107 cases”. Am. Heart J. 93 (1): 94–103. PMID 12655.
- ↑ Pagnoux C, Seror R, Henegar C, Mahr A, Cohen P, Le Guern V, Bienvenu B, Mouthon L, Guillevin L (2010). “Clinical features and outcomes in 348 patients with polyarteritis nodosa: a systematic retrospective study of patients diagnosed between 1963 and 2005 and entered into the French Vasculitis Study Group Database”. Arthritis Rheum. 62 (2): 616–26. doi:10.1002/art.27240. PMID 20112401.
- ↑ Tunç R, Uluhan A, Melikoğlu M, Ozyazgan Y, Ozdoğan H, Yazici H (2001). “A reassessment of the International Study Group criteria for the diagnosis (classification) of Behçet’s syndrome”. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 19 (5 Suppl 24): S45–7. PMID 11760398.
- ↑ Kucukardali Y, Solmazgul E, Kunter E, Oncul O, Yildirim S, Kaplan M (2007). “Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease: analysis of 244 cases”. Clin. Rheumatol. 26 (1): 50–4. doi:10.1007/s10067-006-0230-5. PMID 16538388.
- ↑ Kunnamo I, Kallio P, Pelkonen P, Viander M (1986). “Serum-sickness-like disease is a common cause of acute arthritis in children”. Acta Paediatr Scand. 75 (6): 964–9. PMID 3564980.
- ↑ Oriente P, Biondi-Oriente C, Scarpa R (1994). “Psoriatic arthritis. Clinical manifestations”. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 8 (2): 277–94. PMID 8076388.
- ↑ Kaufmann J, Buccola JM, Stead W, Rowley C, Wong M, Bates CK (2007). “Secondary symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection in a healthy adult”. J Gen Intern Med. 22 (6): 877–8. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0173-9. PMC 2219874. PMID 17384979.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2], Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4]
Overview
Worldwide, the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus is 60 per 100,000 persons. In North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from as low as 1 per 100,000 persons to as high as 20 per 100,000 persons, with an average prevalence of 12 per 100,000 persons. The overall mortality rate of lupus is very high, estimated at approximately 50,000 deaths per 100,000. Women are more commonly affected with systemic lupus erythematosus than men. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare-ups are more prevalent in women. Systemic lupus erythematosus is more prevalent in people of the African and Asian races.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Prevalence
- Worldwide, the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus is 60 per 100,000 persons.[1]
- Worldwide, a conservative estimate suggests that over 5 million people have lupus.
- Throughout the United States, the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from a low of 20 per 100,000 persons to a high of 150 per 100,000 persons with an average prevalence of 25 per 100,000 persons.[1]
Incidence
- In North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from as low as 1 per 100,000 persons to as high as 20 per 100,000 persons, with an average prevalence of 12 per 100,000 persons.[1]
- Systemic lupus erythematosus incidence has approximately tripled during the past 3-4 decades. The increase in incidence is mainly attributed to improvement in diagnostic tests that have led to SLE diagnosis in earlier stages of the disease.
Case Fatality Rate
- The overall mortality rate of lupus is very high, estimated to have approximately 50,000 deaths per 100,000 cases.[1]
- Approximately one third of deaths from SLE occur among persons aged <45 years.
- Non-Causcasian race is a risk factor for death from SLE.
- SLE mortality is mainly due to associated organ failures related to long term or more severe disease manifestations include, secondary infection, end stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis, and cardiovascular disease from accelerated atherosclerosis.
Age
- The disease is more common in the young patient population even though it can occur at any age.
- Sixty-five percent of patients with SLE have disease onset between the ages of 16 and 55.
Gender
- Women are more commonly affected with systemic lupus erythematosus than men. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare ups are more prevalent in women.
- The female to male ratio is approximately 5 to 1.
- Men are more commonly affected with cutaneous lupus erythematosus than women.
- The male to female ratio is approximately 3 to 1.[2]
- Complications of SLE such as renal disease, skin manifestations, cytopenias, serositis, neurologic involvement, thrombosis, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and vasculitis are more common in men than in women.
Race
- Systemic lupus erythematosus is more prevalent in Africans and Asians.
- The disease appears to be more common in urban than rural areas.
- Non-Caucasian race is a risk factor for death due to SLE.
- SLE is more severe among African-American women than others with a higher mortality rate.[1][3]
References
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]
Overview
The most potent risk factor in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus is gender; females are more likely to develop SLE.[1] Other risk factors include HLA genetic mutations; being African American, Asian, or non-Causcasian; and previous exposure to certain infections.
Risk Factors
The underlying cause of this autoimmune disease is not clear. Clinical data suggests that the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with the following factors:
- Female gender: SLE affects women nine times more than men[2][3]
- Age: Occurs more commonly in people younger than 50
- Race: African Americans, Asians, and other non-Causcasians are affected more often than people of other races[4]
- Drugs: The following drugs carry the greatest risk of developing drug-induced lupus erythematosus
- Familial history of:
- Infections can stimulate some antigen specific cells and lead to SLE disease:
- Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may induce anti-DNA antibodies or even lupus-like symptoms. It is associated with higher risk of SLE and also triggering the active course of disease in children[5]
- Trypanosomiasis or mycobacterial infections may have the same effect as EBV
- Ultraviolet (UV) light
- Cigarette smoking[6]
- Crystalline silica exposure in work environment (e.g. cleaning powders, soil, pottery materials, cement, etc.)[7]
- Drug allergy[8]
- Caring for a pet (especially a dog)
- This table must include the cardinal manifestations of differential diagnosis and the list of diseases must be prioritize based on mortality rate and prevalences of the diseases. For example, if you want to write a differential diagnosis table for heat stroke, sepsis, malignant hyperthermia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and serotonin syndrome first, you need to mention the cardinal manifestations for these conditions as, hyperthermia and altered mental status. Second, prioritize your list based on disease mortality or prevalence then, create the table. You can find the example here.
| Differential Diagnosis | Similar Features | Differentiating Features |
|---|---|---|
| Differential 1 |
|
|
| Differential 2 |
|
|
| Differential 3 |
|
|
| Differential 4 |
|
|
| Differential 5 |
|
|
References
- ↑ Grimaldi CM (2006). “Sex and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of the sex hormones estrogen and prolactin on the regulation of autoreactive B cells”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 18 (5): 456–61. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000240354.37927.dd. PMID 16896282.
- ↑ “NIH Fact Sheets – Lupus”.
- ↑ Grimaldi CM (2006). “Sex and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of the sex hormones estrogen and prolactin on the regulation of autoreactive B cells”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 18 (5): 456–61. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000240354.37927.dd. PMID 16896282.
- ↑ McCarty DJ, Manzi S, Medsger TA, Ramsey-Goldman R, LaPorte RE, Kwoh CK (1995). “Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Race and gender differences”. Arthritis Rheum. 38 (9): 1260–70. PMID 7575721.
- ↑ Lossius A, Johansen JN, Torkildsen Ø, Vartdal F, Holmøy T (2012). “Epstein-Barr virus in systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis—association and causation”. Viruses. 4 (12): 3701–30. PMC 3528287. PMID 23342374.
- ↑ Ghaussy NO, Sibbitt WL, Qualls CR (2001). “Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-control study”. J. Rheumatol. 28 (11): 2449–53. PMID 11708417.
- ↑ Parks CG, Cooper GS, Nylander-French LA, Sanderson WT, Dement JM, Cohen PL, Dooley MA, Treadwell EL, St Clair EW, Gilkeson GS, Hoppin JA, Savitz DA (2002). “Occupational exposure to crystalline silica and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based, case-control study in the southeastern United States”. Arthritis Rheum. 46 (7): 1840–50. doi:10.1002/art.10368. PMID 12124868.
- ↑ Cooper GS, Dooley MA, Treadwell EL, St Clair EW, Gilkeson GS (2002). “Risk factors for development of systemic lupus erythematosus: allergies, infections, and family history”. J Clin Epidemiol. 55 (10): 982–9. PMID 12464374.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2]
Overview
According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for systemic lupus erythematosus is not recommended.
Screening
According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for systemic lupus erythematosus is not recommended.
References
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2]
Overview
Common complications of systemic lupus erythematosus include dermatitis, nephritis, and arthritis. Prognosis is generally poor, and the 10-year mortality rate of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is approximately 40%. The disease’s course can be divided into 4 subcategories: developmental phase, preclinical phase, clinical phase, and comorbid complication phase.
Natural History
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease. Several flare-ups may happen in the course of the disease. SLE usually develops in the second and third decades of life, although it can present at any age. It usually starts with mild symptoms such as fatigue, fever, and skin rashes. Without treatment, the patient will develop symptoms of end organ damage, which will eventually lead to death in most patients.
The disease course can be divided into 4 subcategories based on the course of the disease:[1][2][3]
Developmental phase:
- Genetic mutations
- UV radiation exposure
- Smoking
Preclinical phase:
- Mostly associated with auto-immune antibody production
- Autoantibodies common to other systemic autoimmune diseases
- Proceeds with a more disease-specific clinically overt autoimmune phase
Clinical phase:
- The phase due to damages of the autoantibodies to the body tissues (mostly related to disease itself)
- Inflammation
- Involvement of first organs
- Flares
- Involvement of additional organs
- Early damages (e.g. alopecia, fixed erythema, cognitive dysfunction, valvular heart disease, avascular necrosis, tendon rupture, Jaccoud’s arthropathy, and osteoporosis)
Comorbidity-complication phase
The phase of damages due to complications of longstanding disease, immunosuppressive therapy, and end organ damage (irreversible damages and complications)
- Stress (emotional, etc.)
- Sunlight
- Ultraviolet light
- Infection
- Injuries
- Surgery
- Pregnancy
- Abrupt discontinuation of medications
- Treatment noncompliance
- Medications
- Immunizations
- Lupus nephritis
- Presence of neurologic complications
- Presence of vasculitis
- Elevated anti-dsDNA
- Low C3 level
Complications
Complications that can develop as a result of prolonged activation of systemic lupus erythematosus or the SLE therapy are:[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]
(Up arrows represent higher frequencies and down arrows represent lower frequencies)
| Organ | Disease | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal | Dysphagia |
|
↑↑↑ |
| Peptic ulcer disease |
|
↑ | |
| Intestinal pseudo-obstruction |
|
↓↓ | |
| Protein-losing enteropathy |
|
↓↓ | |
| Hepatitis |
|
↑ | |
| Acute pancreatitis |
|
↓ | |
| Mesenteric vasculitis |
|
↓↓ | |
| Acute cholecystitis |
|
↓↓ | |
| Pulmonary | Pleural disease |
|
↑ |
| Acute pneumonitis |
|
↓↓ | |
| Pulmonary hemorrhage |
|
↓↓ | |
| Pulmonary hypertension |
|
↑ | |
| Thromboembolic disease |
|
↑ | |
| Shrinking lung syndrome |
|
↓↓ | |
| Cardiac | Cardiomegaly | ↑↑ | |
| Valvular disease |
|
↑↑ | |
| Pericardial disease | ↓ | ||
| Myocarditis |
|
↓ | |
| Coronary artery disease |
|
↑↑ | |
| Neurological | Cognitive dysfunction |
|
↑ |
| Stroke |
|
↓ | |
| Seizures |
|
↑ | |
| Psychosis |
|
↑↑ | |
| Neuropathies |
|
↑↑ | |
| Musculoskeletal | Arthritis |
|
↑↑↑↑ |
| Osteonecrosis (Avascular necrosis) |
|
↓ | |
| Subcutaneous nodules |
|
↑ | |
| Osteoporosis |
|
↑ | |
| Skin | Cutaneous lupus erythematosus |
|
↑ |
| Photosensitivity |
|
↑↑↑ | |
| Non-scarring alopecia |
|
↑ | |
| Oral and nasal ulcers |
|
↑↑ | |
| Discoid lesions |
|
↑ | |
| Very rare disorders | Malignancy | ↓↓↓ | |
| Diabetes mellitus |
|
↓ |
Prognosis
The prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus ranges from a benign illness to an extremely rapid progressive disease that can lead to a fulminant organ failure and death. Without treatment, systemic lupus eryhtematosus will result in a very high mortality rate, with a report of higher than a 60% mortality rate during the mid-20th century. The presence of nephritis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with SLE; SLE is associated with a 10-year mortality of more than 50% among patients with nephritis. The increase in survival rate of patients and better prognosis may be due to increased disease recognition with more sensitive diagnostic tests, earlier diagnosis or treatment, the inclusion of milder cases, increasingly judicious therapy, and prompt treatment of complications. Although improvements in SLE diagnosis have led to better prognosis, the mortality rate among SLE patients is still 5 times higher than the normal population.[17][18][19][20]
Poor prognostic factors for SLE survival:[21]
- Presence of nephritis (especially diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis)
- Hypertension
- Male sex
- Young age
- Older age at presentation
- Low socioeconomic status
- Black race: Higher rate of nephritis
- Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies
- High overall disease activity
Prognosis markers: [21]
Serum anti ds-DNA titres correlated with:
- Lupus nephritis
- Progression to end-stage renal disease
- Increased disease severity
- Damage or poor survival
Antiphospholipid antibodies correlated with:
- Features of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)
- CNS involvement
- Severe lupus nephritis
- Increase in mortality rate
SLE in men compared to women: [22]
- Less photosensitivity
- More serositis
- Older age at diagnosis
- Higher 1 year mortality compared to women
SLE in the elderly (>65) compared to middle age prevalency: [23]
- Lower incidence of:
- Greater prevalence of:
- Serositis
- Pulmonary involvement
- Sicca syndrome
- Musculoskeletal manifestations
References
- ↑ Iwata Y, Furuichi K, Kaneko S, Wada T (2011). “The role of cytokine in the lupus nephritis”. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011: 594809. doi:10.1155/2011/594809. PMC 3199078. PMID 22028590.
- ↑ Rahman A, Isenberg DA (2008). “Systemic lupus erythematosus”. N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (9): 929–39. doi:10.1056/NEJMra071297. PMID 18305268.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Deguchi Y, Kishimoto S (1991). “Tumour necrosis factor/cachectin plays a key role in autoimmune pulmonary inflammation in lupus-prone mice”. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 85 (3): 392–5. PMC 1535595. PMID 1893619.
- ↑ Crow MK, Olferiev M, Kirou KA (2015). “Identification of Candidate Predictors of Lupus Flare”. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 126: 184–96. PMC 4530671. PMID 26330673.
- ↑ Josić D, Hofmann W, Habermann R, Schulzke JD, Reutter W (1988). “Isolation of immunoglobulins and their use in immunoaffinity HPLC”. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 26 (9): 559–68. PMID 3199078.
- ↑ Gurevitz SL, Snyder JA, Wessel EK, Frey J, Williamson BA (2013). “Systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of the disease and treatment options”. Consult Pharm. 28 (2): 110–21. doi:10.4140/TCP.n.2013.110. PMID 23395811.
- ↑ Zubair A, Frieri M (2013). “Lupus nephritis: review of the literature”. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 13 (6): 580–6. doi:10.1007/s11882-013-0394-4. PMID 24234325.
- ↑ Torres A, Askari AD, Malemud CJ (2009). “Cardiovascular disease complications in systemic lupus erythematosus”. Biomark Med. 3 (3): 239–52. doi:10.2217/bmm.09.14. PMID 20477476.
- ↑ Cortes S, Chambers S, Jerónimo A, Isenberg D (2008). “Diabetes mellitus complicating systemic lupus erythematosus – analysis of the UCL lupus cohort and review of the literature”. Lupus. 17 (11): 977–80. doi:10.1177/0961203308091539. PMID 18852220.
- ↑ Doria A, Canova M, Tonon M, Zen M, Rampudda E, Bassi N, Atzeni F, Zampieri S, Ghirardello A (2008). “Infections as triggers and complications of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Autoimmun Rev. 8 (1): 24–8. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2008.07.019. PMID 18703174.
- ↑ Zizic TM, Classen JN, Stevens MB (1982). “Acute abdominal complications of systemic lupus erythematosus and polyarteritis nodosa”. Am. J. Med. 73 (4): 525–31. PMID 6127033.
- ↑ Cojocaru M, Cojocaru IM, Silosi I, Vrabie CD (2011). “Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Maedica (Buchar). 6 (4): 330–6. PMC 3391953. PMID 22879850.
- ↑ Clowse ME, Jamison M, Myers E, James AH (2008). “A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199 (2): 127.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.012. PMC 2542836. PMID 18456233.
- ↑ Bhattacharyya S, Helfgott SM (2014). “Neurologic complications of systemic lupus erythematosus, sjögren syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis”. Semin Neurol. 34 (4): 425–36. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1390391. PMID 25369438.
- ↑ Alves SC, Fasano S, Isenberg DA (2016). “Autoimmune gastrointestinal complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: case series and literature review”. Lupus. 25 (14): 1509–1519. doi:10.1177/0961203316655210. PMID 27329649.
- ↑ Kang I, Park SH (2003). “Infectious complications in SLE after immunosuppressive therapies”. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 15 (5): 528–34. PMID 12960476.
- ↑ Ren Y, Feng X, Zou Y, Pan W, Wang X, Pan J, Zhang M, Tao J, Zhang Y, Tan K, Li J, Ding X, Qian X, Da Z, Wang M, Chen Z, Sun L (2014). “[Clinical features and prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis]”. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (in Chinese). 94 (13): 973–6. PMID 24851681.
- ↑ Ugarte A, Ruiz-Irastorza G (2016). “SLE: the changing prognosis”. Lupus. 25 (12): 1285–7. doi:10.1177/0961203316652948. PMID 27307448.
- ↑ Matsuyama N, Morimoto S, Tokano Y, Amano H, Nozawa K, Isonuma H, Hashimoto H, Takasaki Y (2010). “The long-term prognosis of lupus nephritis patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide”. Intern. Med. 49 (9): 823–8. PMID 20453401.
- ↑ Sabio JM (2016). “[Systemic lupus erythematosus today]”. Med Clin (Barc) (in Spanish; Castilian). 146 (4): 160–2. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2015.08.001. PMID 26434992.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Lisnevskaia L, Murphy G, Isenberg D (2014). “Systemic lupus erythematosus”. Lancet. 384 (9957): 1878–88. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60128-8. PMID 24881804.
- ↑ de Carvalho JF, do Nascimento AP, Testagrossa LA, Barros RT, Bonfá E (2010). “Male gender results in more severe lupus nephritis”. Rheumatol. Int. 30 (10): 1311–5. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1151-9. PMID 19784840.
- ↑ Feng X, Zou Y, Pan W, Wang X, Wu M, Zhang M, Tao J, Zhang Y, Tan K, Li J, Chen Z, Ding X, Qian X, Da Z, Wang M, Sun L (2014). “Associations of clinical features and prognosis with age at disease onset in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus”. Lupus. 23 (3): 327–34. doi:10.1177/0961203313513508. PMID 24297642.
Diagnostic criteria
Diagnostic criteria
Diagnostic Criteria | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahshid Mir, M.D. [2]
Overview
Based on SLICC criteria, for an SLE diagnosis, the patient should have either at least 4 of 17 criteria, including at least 1 of the 11 clinical criteria and one of the six immunologic criteria (for each criterion, any bullet is considered as 1 clinical criteria), or a biopsy-proven nephritis compatible with SLE in the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies.
Diagnostic criteria
In 2012, Systemic Lupus International Collaboration Criteria (SLICC) developed a new criteria for SLE diagnosis. SLICC criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus was developed based on the old ACR criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus to address a more sensitive diagnostic criteria and also to cover weaknesses of the previous ACR criteria.[1][2]
Based on SLICC criteria, diagnosis of SLE is defined as:[3]
- Meeting at least 4 of 17 criteria, including at least 1 of the 11 clinical criteria and one of the six immunologic criteria
OR
- Biopsy-proven nephritis compatible with SLE in the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies
A criterion is considered positive if one or more of the observations listed in the definition for the criterion are present in the patient. A criterion should only be counted once, regardless of the number of observations in the definition that the patient presents with.
| Category | Criterion | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical | Acute cutaneous lupus |
|
| Chronic cutaneous lupus |
| |
| Nonscarring alopecia |
| |
| Oral or nasal ulcers |
| |
| Joint disease |
| |
| Serositis |
| |
| Renal |
| |
| Neurologic |
| |
| Hematologic | Hemolytic anemia |
|
| Leukopenia or lymphopenia |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia |
| |
| Immunologic | ANA |
|
| Anti-dsDNA |
| |
| Anit-SM |
| |
| Antiphospholipid |
| |
| Low complement | ||
| Direct Coombs’ test |
|
References
- ↑ Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ (1982). “The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Arthritis Rheum. 25 (11): 1271–7. PMID 7138600.
- ↑ Hochberg MC (1997). “Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus”. Arthritis Rheum. 40 (9): 1725. doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199709)40:9<1725::AID-ART29>3.0.CO;2-Y. PMID 9324032.
- ↑ Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, Wallace DJ, Nived O, Sturfelt G, Ramsey-Goldman R, Bae SC, Hanly JG, Sánchez-Guerrero J, Clarke A, Aranow C, Manzi S, Urowitz M, Gladman D, Kalunian K, Costner M, Werth VP, Zoma A, Bernatsky S, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Khamashta MA, Jacobsen S, Buyon JP, Maddison P, Dooley MA, van Vollenhoven RF, Ginzler E, Stoll T, Peschken C, Jorizzo JL, Callen JP, Lim SS, Fessler BJ, Inanc M, Kamen DL, Rahman A, Steinsson K, Franks AG, Sigler L, Hameed S, Fang H, Pham N, Brey R, Weisman MH, McGwin G, Magder LS (2012). “Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus”. Arthritis Rheum. 64 (8): 2677–86. doi:10.1002/art.34473. PMC 3409311. PMID 22553077.
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH





