Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Gynecomastia

Template:DiseaseDisorder infobox

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2], Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [3]

Synonyms and keywords: Gynecomazia, Hypertrophy of male breast, Mammary enlargement in male

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Gynecomastia is a benign male breast enlargement. Gynecomastia occurs due to increase estrogen to androgen ratio. Increased estrogen to androgen ratio can be physiological, such as seen during infancy, puberty and old age or pathological, which is due to obesity, steroid use, pharmacologic agents, medical conditions including chronic liver and renal failure or hypogonadism. However, most cases of the gynecomastia are idiopathic and asymptomatic. The diagnosis is primarily clinical. Other modalities used to diagnose gynecomastia include laboratory investigations such as blood hormone levels, renal function tests and liver function tests and imaging such as ultrasound or mammography. The treatment is usually supportive. Antiestrogens and surgical intervention can be considered in certain cases depending on physician and patient preference.

Historical Perspective

Gynecomastia is derived from Greek words, gyne which means woman and mastos which means breast. The term was originally coined by Galen, a Greek physician. Gynecomastia has been a known concept since the days of Aristotle (384–322 BC). The surgical management was initially discussed by Paulus, a Greek physician and later modified by Al-Zahrawi or Albucasis, an Andalusian surgeon.

Classification

Gynecomastia has been classified by various systems mainly based on surgical management, the severity of gynecomastia, physical appearance, and etiology.

Pathophysiology

The main pathophysiology behind gynecomastia is increased estrogen to androgen ratio which can occur through multiple mechanisms. These mechanisms can be physiological, pathological or pharmacological.

Causes

Common known causes of gynecomastia include physiological hormonal changes, use of medications and pathological entities such as cirrhosis, hyperthyroidism, testicular tumors and hypogonadism. Less common causes include androgen insensitivity syndrome, Kallmann syndrome, defects of testosterone pathway and tumors.

Differentiating gynecomastia from other diseases

Gynecomastia must be differentiated from other diseases that cause breast enlargement in men. These diseases include pseudo gynecomastia, breast cancer, breast abscess, and lipoma.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Gynecomastia has the highest prevalence in elderly and neonatal age. Gynecomastia has trimodal age distribution with no racial preference.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of gynecomastia include the use of medications, cirrhosis, and hyperthyroidism. The less common risk factors include aromatase overexpression, androgen insensitivity syndrome and testosterone pathway defects.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gynecomastia.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

If left untreated patients with gynecomastia may progress to develop psychosocial stresses and rarely breast cancer. The majority of physiological gynecomastia is self-limited. Pathological gynecomastia has an excellent prognosis and responds well to treatment. Pharmacological gynecomastia responds very well to the cessation of the the offending agent.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of gynecomastia. Gynecomastia is diagnosed clinically after a thorough history and physical examination. Laboratory investigations, imaging and exclusion of other conditions like pseudogynecomastia and breast cancer, is also helpful in the diagnosis of gynecomastia.

History and Symptoms

The hallmark of gynecomastia is breast enlargement. The majority of patients with gynecomastia are asymptomatic. Pain is the most common symptom of gynecomastia. Less common symptoms depend on the underlying cause.

Physical Examination

Common physical examination findings of gynecomastia include breast enlargement with or without tenderness. Patients with gynecomastia are otherwise asymptomatic.

Laboratory Findings

Gynecomastia is diagnosed clinically after a thorough history and physical examination. Gynecomastia which is recent in onset and tender on the examination should have serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), LH, testosterone, and estradiol measured. The hormonal levels may vary depending on the underlying cause.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with gynecomastia.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with gynecomastia.

CT scan

There are no CT scan findings associated with gynecomastia.

MRI

There are no MRI findings associated with gynecomastia.

Ultrasound

Gynecomastia is diagnosed clinically after a thorough history and physical examination. Ultrasound can be done in patients with gynecomastia when physical findings raise suspicion of a lump, abscess or breast cancer.

Other Imaging Findings

Gynecomastia is diagnosed clinically after a thorough history and physical examination. Mammogram can be done in gynecomastia when physical findings of a patient raise suspicion of breast cancer.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Gynecomastia is diagnosed clinically after a thorough history and physical examination. Laboratory investigations and imaging studies can be helpful in the diagnosis of gynecomastia. Other diagnostic study in the work up for gynecomastia include biopsy, which helps to confirm the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Gynecomastia is usually a self-limited condition, reassurance and follow-ups are recommended. Causative medications should be withheld and any underlying condition leading to gynecomastia should be throughly investigated and treated. Pharmacologic therapy is beneficial for the first several months until fibrous tissue replaces the glandular tissue. Pharmacologic options include SERMs, androgens and aromatase inhibitors.

Surgery

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with gynecomastia. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either psychological stresses, extensive gynecomastia or failure of medical treatment. The type of surgical technique depends on the extent of gynecomastia.

Primary Prevention

There are no established methods for the primary prevention of gynecomastia.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established methods for the secondary prevention of gynecomastia.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Gynecomastia is derived from Greek words, “gyne” which means woman and “mastos” which means breast. The term was originally coined by Galen, a Greek physician. Gynecomastia has been a known concept since the days of Aristotle (384–322 BC). The surgical management was initially discussed by Paulus, a Greek physician and later modified by Al-Zahrawi or Albucasis, an Andalusian surgeon.

Historical Perspective

The most important historical events related to gynecomastia diagnosis and treatment include:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

  • The term gynecomastia was coined by Galen (130–200 AD), a Greek physician who described gynecomastia as an abnormal increase in fat within the male breast.
  • Gynecomastia is derived from Greek words; “gyne” which means woman and “mastos” which means breast.
  • Gynecomastia has been a known concept since the days of Aristotle.
  • In the 7th century, there is some evidence of surgical treatment of gynecomastia by Paulus, a Greek physician. He is known for suggesting surgical treatment of gynecomastia for the first time in his Epitome of Medicine (Seven Books).
  • Haly Abbas later in the Islamic age described the surgical management of gynecomastia in his Kitab al-Maliki (The Royal Book). His work was based on that of Paulus of Aegina.
  • Al-Zahrawi or Albucasis, an Andalusian surgeon also provided the surgical treatment of gynecomastia after Paulus.
  • Four centuries later, Şerefeddin Sabuncuoğlu illustrated the surgical techniques for the management of gynecomastia. These techniques were based on the work by Paulus and Al-Zahrawi.
  • Al-Zahrawi’s surgical management was thought to be based on those of Paulus. The modification of surgical approach and use of medicinal substances might be indicative of Al-Zahrawi’s own practice of the procedure.
  • Al-Zahrawi’s surgical management was practiced for many centuries.
  • The probable etiology of gynecomastia was not discussed by Paulus and Al-Zahrawi in their work. In current practice, surgery for gynecomastia is reserved after the underlying cause is treated or after the failure of medical treatment.
  • In the 18th century, Olpan, Schuchardt, and Gruber were among the prominent people who worked on gynecomastia.
  • In 1919, Dr. Helen Ingleby published two cases of gynecomastia.

References

  1. “Reorganized text”. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 141 (5): 428. 2015. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0540. PMID 25996397.
  2. Hosseini SF, Alakbarli F, Ghabili K, Shoja MM (2011). “Hakim Esmail Jorjani (1042-1137 AD: ): Persian physician and jurist”. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 284 (3): 647–50. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1707-7. PMID 20931210.
  3. Chavoushi SH, Ghabili K, Kazemi A, Aslanabadi A, Babapour S, Ahmedli R; et al. (2012). “Surgery for Gynecomastia in the Islamic Golden Age: Al-Tasrif of Al-Zahrawi (936-1013 AD)”. ISRN Surg. 2012: 934965. doi:10.5402/2012/934965. PMC 3459224. PMID 23050167.
  4. Papadakis M, Manios A, de Bree E, Trompoukis C, Tsiftsis DD (2010). “Gynaecomastia and scrotal rhacosis: two aesthetic surgical operations for men in Byzantine times”. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 63 (8): e600–4. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.013. PMID 20538533.
  5. Annajjar J (2010). “Abu Alkasem Al Zehrawi (Albucasis 936-1013)”. Childs Nerv Syst. 26 (7): 857–9. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0912-9. PMID 19484247.
  6. Karsner HT (1946). “Gynecomastia”. Am J Pathol. 22 (2): 235–315. PMC 1934190. PMID 19970865.
  7. Ingleby H (1919). “TWO CASES OF SO-CALLED GYNAECOMASTIA IN YOUNG BOYS”. Br Med J. 2 (3072): 631–2. PMC 2343807. PMID 20769701.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2], Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [3]

Overview

Gynecomastia has been classified by various systems mainly based on surgical management, the severity of gynecomastia, physical appearance, and etiology.

Classification

Different gynecomastia classification systems are:[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Surgical classification of gynecomastia

Classification system Criteria Description
Physical Tissue type
Nydick’s Physical
  • Gland limited to the retro areolar region and it does not reach the edge of the areola
  • Gland extends as far as the edge of the areola
  • The increase in gland volume extends beyond the edge of the areola
Tanner’s Physical
  • Stage 1: Nipple prominence
  • Stage 2: Mammillary button stage. The breast and the nipple-areola complex are slightly swollen and diameter of the areola increases
  • Stage 3: Further swelling of the breast and areola without separation of their edges
  • Stage 4: Areola and nipple become protrusive and form a secondary protrusion above the breast
  • Stage 5: There is protrusion of the nipple only after retraction of the areola from the breast surface
Simon’s Physical
  • Grade 1: Small visible breast enlargement and no skin redundancy
  • Grade 2a: Moderate breast enlargement without skin redundancy
  • Grade 2b: Moderate breast enlargement with skin redundancy
  • Grade 3: Marked breast enlargement with marked skin redundancy
Deutinger’s and Freilinger’s Physical
  • Grade 1: Thoracic wall poor in the flesh with mammary tissue localized behind and around the nipple without skin excess
  • Grade 2: Adipose thoracic wall with widespread alterations and breasts similar to feminine ones during puberty
  • Grade 3: Widespread alterations with excess adipose tissue, skin redundancy and inframammary fold and ptosis
Cohen’s Physical
Rohrich’s Physical/Tissue type
Gusenoff’s Physical
  • Grade 1: Minimal excess skin and fat with minimal alteration of nipple-areola complex (NAC) and inframammary fold (IMF)
    • 1a: No lateral skin roll
    • 1b: Lateral skin roll
  • Grade 2: Nipple-areola complex (NAC) and inframammary fold (IMF) below the ideal IMF with lateral chest roll and minimal upper abdominal laxity
  • Grade 3: Nipple-areola complex (NAC) and inframammary fold (IMF) below the ideal IMF with lateral chest roll and significant upper abdominal laxity
Barros’s Physical
  • Grade I: Increased diameter and slight protrusion limited to the areola region
  • Grade II: Moderate hypertrophy of the breast with the nipple-areola complex (NAC) above the inframammary fold (IMF)
  • Grade III: Major hypertrophy of the breast with glandular ptosis and the NAC situated at the same height as or as much as 1 cm below the inframammary fold (IM)
  • Grade IV: Major breast hypertrophy with skin redundancy, severe ptosis, and the NAC positioned ≥1 cm below the inframammary fold (IMF)
Çi̇l’s Imaging (computed tomography)
  • Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue is <0.3
  • Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue is 0.3–0.5
  • Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue is >0.6
Cordova’s Physical
  • Grade I: Increase in diameter and protrusion limited to the areolar region
  • Grade II: Hypertrophy of all the structural components of the breast and the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is above the inframammary fold (IMF)
  • Grade III: Hypertrophy of all the structural components with nipple-areola complex (NAC) at the same height as or approximately 1 cm below the inframammary fold (IMF). In this group we can also include male tuberous breast
  • Grade IV: Hypertrophy of all the structural components with nipple-areola complex (NAC) >1 cm below theinframammary fold (IMF)
Fruhstorfer’s Physical
  • Small-to-moderate gynecomastia
  • Moderate-to-large gynecomastia
Mladick’s Physical
  • No sagging
  • Slight sagging
  • Moderate sagging
  • Extensive sagging
Monarca’s Physical/tissue type
  • Grade I: Minimal hypertrophy (<250 g)
    • IA: Primarily fatty breast tissue
    • IB: Primarily fibrous breast tissue
    • IC: Nipple malposition (upright)
    • ID: Gynoid (rounded) shape of the chest
    • IE: Absence of sternal notch II: Moderate hypertrophy (250–500 g)
  • Grade IIA: Primarily fatty breast tissue
    • IIB: Primarily fibrous breast tissue with peripheral fat
    • IIC: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IID: Moderate gynoid shape of the chest
    • IIE: Absence of sternal notch
  • Grade III: Severe hypertrophy with grade I ptosis (>500 g)
    • IIIA: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of grade I
    • IIIB: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IIIC: Severe gynoid shape of the chest
    • IIID: Absence of sternal notch
  • Grade IV: Severe hypertrophy with grade II or III ptosis (>500–700 g)
    • IVA: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of grade II
    • IVB: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of with nipple reorientation grade III
    • IVC: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IVD: Severe gynoid shape of the chest
    • IVE: Absence of sternal notch
Ratnam’s Physical
  • Type 1: Enlarged breasts with elastic skin and no fold
  • Type 2: Enlarged breasts with elastic skin and an inframammory fold (IMF)
  • Type 3: Ptotic breasts with inelastic skin
Webster’s Tissue type

*NAC, nipple-areola complex; IMF, inframammary fold

Classification based on severity

Gynecomastia can be classified on the basis of severity as:

  • Grade I: Minor enlargement with no skin excess
  • Grade II: Moderate enlargement with no skin excess
  • Grade III: Moderate enlargement with skin excess
  • Grade IV: Marked enlargement with skin excess

Classifcation based on etiology

References

  1. Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017). “Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139 (3): 638e–648e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003059. PMID 28234829.
  2. Monarca C, Rizzo MI (2013). “Gynecomastia: tips and tricks-classification and surgical approach”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 131 (5): 863e–5e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a18f. PMID 23629140.
  3. Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP (2003). “Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 111 (2): 909–23, discussion 924-5. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000042146.40379.25. PMID 12560721.
  4. Wollina, U; Goldman, A (June 2011). “Minimally invasive esthetic procedures of the male breast”. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 10 (2): 150–155. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00548.x. PMID 21649820.
  5. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973). “Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 51 (1): 48–52. PMID 4687568.
  6. Gikas P, Mokbel K (2007). “Management of gynaecomastia: an update”. Int J Clin Pract. 61 (7): 1209–15. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01095.x. PMID 17362482.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

The main pathophysiology behind gynecomastia is increased estrogen to androgen ratio which can occur through multiple mechanisms. These mechanisms can be physiological, pathological or pharmacological.

Pathophysiology

Hormones involved in breast development


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Breast Tissue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stimulatory Action
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inhibitory Action
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Estrogen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Androgens
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GH & IGF-1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Pathogenesis

Some examples regarding gynecomastia development based on the pathophysiology include:

Conditions causing increased estrogen Conditions causing decreased testosterone

Genetics

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of aromatase overexpression form of gynecomastia is encoded by a chromosome 15q21.2.[8] As a result, any mutation in the mentioned loci result in aromatase overexpression.

Associated Conditions

Gynecomastia is associated with psychological stress such as:[11][12][13][14]

Gross Pathology

On gross pathology, characteristic findings of gynecomastia include:

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic inspection, gynecomastia histology shows:[15]

Ductal hyperplasia, source:https://librepathology.org


Gynecomastoid hyperplasia, source:https://librepathology.org


References

  1. Bocchinfuso WP, Korach KS (1997). “Mammary gland development and tumorigenesis in estrogen receptor knockout mice”. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2 (4): 323–34. PMID 10935020.
  2. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O (1993). “Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (23): 11162–6. PMC 47942. PMID 8248223.
  3. Kleinberg DL, Feldman M, Ruan W (2000). “IGF-I: an essential factor in terminal end bud formation and ductal morphogenesis”. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 5 (1): 7–17. PMID 10791764.
  4. Mieritz MG, Sorensen K, Aksglaede L, Mouritsen A, Hagen CP, Hilsted L, Andersson AM, Juul A (2014). “Elevated serum IGF-I, but unaltered sex steroid levels, in healthy boys with pubertal gynaecomastia”. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 80 (5): 691–8. doi:10.1111/cen.12323. PMID 24033660.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Swerdloff RS, Ng J. PMID 25905330. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. Barros AC, Sampaio Mde C (2012). “Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment”. Sao Paulo Med J. 130 (3): 187–97. PMID 22790552.
  7. Li X, Wärri A, Mäkelä S, Ahonen T, Streng T, Santti R; et al. (2002). “Mammary gland development in transgenic male mice expressing human P450 aromatase”. Endocrinology. 143 (10): 4074–83. doi:10.1210/en.2002-220181. PMID 12239119.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Shozu M, Sebastian S, Takayama K, Hsu WT, Schultz RA, Neely K; et al. (2003). “Estrogen excess associated with novel gain-of-function mutations affecting the aromatase gene”. N Engl J Med. 348 (19): 1855–65. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021559. PMID 12736278.
  9. Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009). “Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management”. Mayo Clin Proc. 84 (11): 1010–5. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60671-X. PMC 2770912. PMID 19880691.
  10. Mathur R, Braunstein GD (1997). “Gynecomastia: pathomechanisms and treatment strategies”. Horm Res. 48 (3): 95–102. PMID 11546925.
  11. Wassersug, Richard J.; Oliffe, John L. (2009). “The Social Context for Psychological Distress from Iatrogenic Gynecomastia with Suggestions for Its Management”. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 6 (4): 989–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01053.x. ISSN 1743-6095.
  12. Strømsvik, Nina; Råheim, Målfrid; Øyen, Nina; Engebretsen, Lars Fredrik; Gjengedal, Eva (2010). “Stigmatization and Male Identity: Norwegian Males’ Experience after Identification as BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers”. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 19 (4): 360–370. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9293-1. ISSN 1059-7700.
  13. Hack, Thomas F.; Sawatzky, Jo-Ann; Pedersen, Allison E. (2010). “The Sequelae of Anxiety in Breast Cancer: A Human Response to Illness Model”. Oncology Nursing Forum. 37 (4): 469–475. doi:10.1188/10.ONF.469-475. ISSN 0190-535X.
  14. Senín-Calderón, Cristina; Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F.; Perona-Garcelán, Salvador; Perpiñá, Conxa (2017). “Body image and adolescence: A behavioral impairment model”. Psychiatry Research. 248: 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.003. ISSN 0165-1781.
  15. Nicolis GL, Modlinger RS, Gabrilove JL (1971). “A study of the histopathology of human gynecomastia”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 32 (2): 173–8. doi:10.1210/jcem-32-2-173. PMID 5539033.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Common known causes of gynecomastia include physiological hormonal changes, use of medications and pathological entities such as cirrhosishyperthyroidismtesticular tumors and hypogonadism. Less common causes include androgen insensitivity syndromeKallmann syndrome, defects of testosterone pathway and tumors.

Causes

Life-threatening Causes

Life-threatening causes include conditions which may result in death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated. There are no known life-threatening causes of gynecomastia.

Common Causes

Less Common Causes[10]

To review a complete list of gynecomastia causes, click here.

Genetic Causes

Causes in Alphabetical Order

Causes of gynecomastia in alphabetical order:[11][12]

References

  1. Deepinder F, Braunstein GD (2012). “Drug-induced gynecomastia: an evidence-based review”. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 11 (5): 779–95. doi:10.1517/14740338.2012.712109. PMID 22862307.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Braunstein GD (2007). “Clinical practice. Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (12): 1229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp070677. PMID 17881754.
  3. Lainscak M, Pelliccia F, Rosano G, Vitale C, Schiariti M, Greco C; et al. (2015). “Safety profile of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Spironolactone and eplerenone”. Int J Cardiol. 200: 25–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.127. PMID 26404748.
  4. Henley DV, Lipson N, Korach KS, Bloch CA (2007). “Prepubertal gynecomastia linked to lavender and tea tree oils”. N Engl J Med. 356 (5): 479–85. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa064725. PMID 17267908.
  5. Vandeven H, Pensler J. PMID 28613563. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Swerdloff RS, Ng J. PMID 25905330. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. Ladizinski B, Lee KC, Nutan FN, Higgins HW, Federman DG (2014). “Gynecomastia: etiologies, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management”. South Med J. 107 (1): 44–9. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000033. PMID 24389786.
  8. Wagner MS, Wajner SM, Maia AL (2008). “The role of thyroid hormone in testicular development and function”. J Endocrinol. 199 (3): 351–65. doi:10.1677/JOE-08-0218. PMC 2799043. PMID 18728126.
  9. Cavanaugh J, Niewoehner CB, Nuttall FQ (1990). “Gynecomastia and cirrhosis of the liver”. Arch. Intern. Med. 150 (3): 563–5. PMID 2310274.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Shozu M, Sebastian S, Takayama K, Hsu WT, Schultz RA, Neely K; et al. (2003). “Estrogen excess associated with novel gain-of-function mutations affecting the aromatase gene”. N Engl J Med. 348 (19): 1855–65. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021559. PMID 12736278.
  11. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:77 ISBN 1591032016
  12. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:68 ISBN 140510368X

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Gynecomastia from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2] Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[3]

Overview

Gynecomastia must be differentiated from other diseases that cause breast enlargement in men. These diseases include pseudo gynecomastia, breast cancerbreast abscess, and lipoma.

Differentiating Gynecomastia from other Diseases

Gynecomastia can be differentiated from other pathologies by detailed history taking and physical examination.[1][2][3]

Diseases Laboratory Findings Physical Examination Other physical exam findings Age of onset
Estrogen-to-androgen ratio Cholesterol levels WBC count Tenderness Enlargement Nipple discharge Lymphadenopathy
Gynecomastia N/A +/- + +/- N/A
  • Round discrete mass felt under areola and usually bilateral
  • Physiological gynecomastia is seen in newborns, adolescents and elderly
Pseudo gynecomastia Normal N/A N/A +/- + +/- N/A
  • Any age
Breast Cancer N/A N/A N/A +/-; mostly painless + + +
  • Usually painless mass
  • Middle age to elderly
Lipoma N/A N/A +/- + +/- N/A
  • Soft and mobile
  • Middle age to elderly
Sebaceous cyst N/A N/A N/A +/- + +/- +/-
  • Asymmetric enlargement and swelling feels closer to the skin
  • Any age
Mastitis N/A N/A Tender +/- +/- +/-
  • Systemic clinical features of infection
  • Any age

Differentiation of gynecomastia from other types of breast lumps: ABBREVIATIONS
LAP=Lymphadenopathy, HRT=Hormonal replacement therapy, FNA=Fine needle aspiration, DCIS=Ductal carcinoma in-situ

Diseases Benign or

Malignant

Clinical manifestation Paraclinical findings Gold standard diagnosis
Demography History Symptoms Signs Histopathology Imaging
Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP
Fibroadenoma[4] + ±
  • Solitary
  • Well-defined
  • Mobile mass
Ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid mass
Breast cyst[5]
  • May resolve after aspiration
  • Further evaluation for unresolved masses
+ ±
  • Solitary
  • Cluster of small masses or an ill-defined mass
  • Smooth, firm, and frequently tender
  • Nonproliferative breast lesions
Ultrasound:
  • Simple cyst: Well circumscribed, posterior acoustic enhancement without internal echoes
  • Complicated cyst: Homogenous low-level internal echoes due to without solid components
  • Complex cyst: Thick walls greater than 0.5 mm with solid component
Fibrocystic change[6]
  • Unknown prevalence among adolescents
  • >50% in women of reproductive age
+ + ±
  • Nonproliferative breast lesions
Ultrasound:
  • Small cysts in mammary zone
  • Fibroglandular tissue around the mass
Galactocele[7][8] + ± ± Mammography:
  • Intermediate mass in absence of classic fat-fluid level

Ultrasound:

  • Complex mass
Cysts of montgomery[9]
  • Most common in age of 10-20 years old
  • More than 80% resolve spontaneously
  • Drainage is essential in rare cases
+ ± ±
  • Asymptomatic subareolar mass
  • Drainage of clear to brownish fluid
± Ultrasound:
  • Single cystic lesion in retroareolar area
Hamartoma[10]
  • Common in women older than 35 years old
± ± Mammography:
  • Well-described
  • Discrete, solid, and encapsulated lesion
Breast abscess[11][12]
  • Complication of lactational mastitis in 14% of cases
  • Common among African-American women, heavy smokers , and obese patients
+ + + Ultrasound:
  • Fluid collection
Mastitis[13][14] ± + ± + Breast parenchyma inflammation: Ultrasound:
  • Ill-defined area with hyperechogenicity with inflamed fat lobules
  • Skin thickening
Diseases Benign or
Malignant
Demography History Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP Histopathology Imaging Gold standard diagnosis
Breast carcinoma[15][16][17]
  • Most common diagnosed cancer among women
  • Leading cause of cancer death in women 40-49 years old
+ ±
  • Hard
  • Immobile
  • Solitary
  • Irregular margin
± ± Mammography:

Ultrasound:

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)[18][19] ± ±
  • May have normal physical exam
Mammography:
Microinvasive breast cancer[20]
  • Rare
  • Commonly referred to DCIS with microinvasion
  • Average age 50-60 years old
+ ±
  • Solitary
  • Firm palpable mass
±
  • Associated with high grade DCIS
Mammography:
Breast sarcoma[21]
  • Rare type, < 1% of all breast malignancies
  • Average age of between 45-50 years
+
  • Well-defined
  • Firm mass
± Mammography:
  • Noncalcified oval mass Indistinct margins
Phyllodes tumor[22][23] ±
  • Smooth and multinodular
  • Well-defined
  • Firm mass
  • Mobile
  • Nonepithelial breast neoplasm with average size of 5 cm
Ultrasound:
  • Solid mass
  • Hypoechoic
  • Well-circumscribed

Mammography:

  • Smooth mass
  • Polylobulated mass
Lymphoma[24][25]
  • Extremely rare ( 0.04%-0.5%)
  • Average age 55-60 years
+
  • Well-defined, firm mass
  • Multiple
± Mammography:
Duct ectasia[26]
  • Usually resolve spontaneously
± ± ±
  • Usually asymptomatic
  • Distention of subareolar ducts
Ultrasound:
  • Dilated milk ducts
  • Fluid-filled ducts
Intraductal papilloma[27]
  • Common in women between 35-55 years old
+ ± ±
  • Solitary or multiple lesion
  • Large lump near nipple
  • Growth of papillary cell into a lumen
Ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid nodule
Lipoma[28]
  • Common between age of 40-60 years old
  • Benign tumors
  • May experience recurrence
+
  • Solitary
  • Mobile
  • Soft mass
Ultrasound:
  • Well-Circumscribed
  • Hypoechoic lesion
Sclerosing adenosis[29][30]
  • Recurrent pain during mensturation
  • May present as a mass or incidental finding on mammogram
  • No treatment is needed
± +
  • Multiple lesion
  • Firm
  • Tender nodules
±
  • Proliferative disease
Mammography:
Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia[31][32]
  • Common in reproductive age women
+
  • Solitary firm mass
  • Thickening
Mammography and ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid mass
  • Noncalcified
Mondor’s disease[33][34]
  • Benign and self-limiting disease
  • Resolve after 4-6 weeks
+ +
  • Thick and tender cord on breast skin
+
  • N/A
Ultrasound:
  • Tubular anechoic structure
  • Multiple narrowing areas
Diseases Benign or
Malignant
Demography History Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP Histopathology Imaging Gold standard diagnosis
Diabetic mastopathy[35]
  • Suspicious breast mass
  • After diagnosis, excision is not required
+
  • Ill-defined mass
  • Immobile
Ultrasound:
  • Irregular mass
  • Hypoechoic
  • Dense lesion
Gynecomastia[36][37]
  • Benign breast tissue swelling among men and boys around puberty
+ ± ±
  • Unilateral or bilateral firm mass
  • Breast swelling
  • Rubbery mass
Ultrasound:
Sarcoidosis[38]
  • Rare in patients with systemic involvement
+
  • Firm mass
  • Hard mass
Mammography:
  • Irregular
  • Ill-defined
  • Spiculated solid mass
Fat necrosis[39] + ±
  • Hard or smooth mass
  • Solitary mass
  • Mobile
  • Collections of liquefied fat
Ultrasound:
  • Collections of liquefied fat
  • Oil cysts

References

  1. Dickson G (2012). “Gynecomastia”. Am Fam Physician. 85 (7): 716–22. PMID 22534349.
  2. Croes K, Baeyens W, Bruckers L, Den Hond E, Koppen G, Nelen V; et al. (2009). “Hormone levels and sexual development in Flemish adolescents residing in areas differing in pollution pressure”. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 212 (6): 612–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.05.002. PMID 19546029.
  3. Laituri CA, Garey CL, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD, Gittes GK, Snyder CL (2010). “Treatment of adolescent gynecomastia”. J Pediatr Surg. 45 (3): 650–4. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.11.016. PMID 20223338.
  4. Pinto, Joana; Aguiar, Ana Teresa; Duarte, Hálio; Vilaverde, Filipa; Rodrigues, Ângelo; Krug, José Luís (2014). “Simple and Complex Fibroadenomas”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 33 (3): 415–419. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.3.415. ISSN 0278-4297.
  5. Courtillot C, Plu-Bureau G, Binart N, Balleyguier C, Sigal-Zafrani B, Goffin V; et al. (2005). “Benign breast diseases”. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 10 (4): 325–35. doi:10.1007/s10911-006-9006-4. PMID 16900392.
  6. Templeman C, Hertweck SP (2000). “Breast disorders in the pediatric and adolescent patient”. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 27 (1): 19–34. PMID 10693180.
  7. Yu JH, Kim MJ, Cho H, Liu HJ, Han SJ, Ahn TG (2013). “Breast diseases during pregnancy and lactation”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 56 (3): 143–59. doi:10.5468/ogs.2013.56.3.143. PMC 3784111. PMID 24327995.
  8. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de las Heras P; et al. (2007). “Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation”. Radiographics. 27 Suppl 1: S101–24. doi:10.1148/rg.27si075505. PMID 18180221.
  9. De Silva NK, Brandt ML (2006). “Disorders of the breast in children and adolescents, Part 2: breast masses”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 19 (6): 415–8. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.09.002. PMID 17174833.
  10. Tse GM, Law BK, Ma TK, Chan AB, Pang LM, Chu WC; et al. (2002). “Hamartoma of the breast: a clinicopathological review”. J Clin Pathol. 55 (12): 951–4. PMC 1769817. PMID 12461066.
  11. D’Alfonso TM, Ginter PS, Shin SJ (2015). “A Review of Inflammatory Processes of the Breast with a Focus on Diagnosis in Core Biopsy Samples”. J Pathol Transl Med. 49 (4): 279–87. doi:10.4132/jptm.2015.06.11. PMC 4508565. PMID 26095437.
  12. Dixon JM (2007). “Breast abscess”. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 68 (6): 315–20. doi:10.12968/hmed.2007.68.6.23574. PMID 17639835.
  13. Dixon JM, Ravisekar O, Chetty U, Anderson TJ (1996). “Periductal mastitis and duct ectasia: different conditions with different aetiologies”. Br J Surg. 83 (6): 820–2. PMID 8696751.
  14. Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007). “ACOG Committee Opinion No. 361: Breastfeeding: maternal and infant aspects”. Obstet Gynecol. 109 (2 Pt 1): 479–80. PMID 17267864.
  15. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (January 2018). “Cancer statistics, 2018”. CA Cancer J Clin. 68 (1): 7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442. PMID 29313949.
  16. Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR (October 2005). “Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer”. Br. J. Cancer. 93 (9): 1046–52. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602787. PMC 2361680. PMID 16175185.
  17. Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, Caggiano V (2009). “Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004”. Breast J. 15 (6): 593–602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00822.x. PMID 19764994.
  18. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (February 2010). “Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102 (3): 170–8. doi:10.1093/jnci/djp482. PMID 20071685.
  19. Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD, Anderson WF (November 2008). “Recent trends in breast cancer among younger women in the United States”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100 (22): 1643–8. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn344. PMC 2720764. PMID 19001605.
  20. Sue GR, Lannin DR, Killelea B, Chagpar AB (October 2013). “Predictors of microinvasion and its prognostic role in ductal carcinoma in situ”. Am. J. Surg. 206 (4): 478–81. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.039. PMID 23791403.
  21. Smith TB, Gilcrease MZ, Santiago L, Hunt KK, Yang WT (April 2012). “Imaging features of primary breast sarcoma”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198 (4): W386–93. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7341. PMID 22451578.
  22. Geisler DP, Boyle MJ, Malnar KF, McGee JM, Nolen MC, Fortner SM, Broughan TA (April 2000). “Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a review of 32 cases”. Am Surg. 66 (4): 360–6. PMID 10776873.
  23. Chaney AW, Pollack A, McNeese MD, Zagars GK, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Hunt KK (October 2000). “Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast”. Cancer. 89 (7): 1502–11. PMID 11013364.
  24. Brogi E, Harris NL (June 1999). “Lymphomas of the breast: pathology and clinical behavior”. Semin. Oncol. 26 (3): 357–64. PMID 10375092.
  25. Barişta I, Baltali E, Tekuzman G, Kars A, Ruacan S, Ozişik Y, Güler N, Güllü IH, Atahan IL, Firat D (2000). “Primary breast lymphomas–a retrospective analysis of twelve cases”. Acta Oncol. 39 (2): 135–9. PMID 10859001.
  26. Schwartz GF (June 1982). “Benign neoplasms and “inflammations” of the breast”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 25 (2): 373–85. PMID 6286199.
  27. Wen X, Cheng W (January 2013). “Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors”. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 20 (1): 94–101. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2590-1. PMID 22878621.
  28. Guray M, Sahin AA (May 2006). “Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management”. Oncologist. 11 (5): 435–49. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-435. PMID 16720843.
  29. Jensen RA, Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW (1989). “Invasive breast cancer risk in women with sclerosing adenosis”. Cancer. 64 (10): 1977–83. PMID 2804888.
  30. Wang J, Costantino JP, Tan-Chiu E, Wickerham DL, Paik S, Wolmark N (2004). “Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 96 (8): 616–20. PMID 15100339.
  31. Celliers L, Wong DD, Bourke A (2010). “Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: a study of the mammographic and sonographic features”. Clin Radiol. 65 (2): 145–9. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.10.003. PMID 20103437.
  32. Salvador R, Lirola JL, Domínguez R, López M, Risueño N (2004). “Pseudo-angiomatous stromal hyperplasia presenting as a breast mass: imaging findings in three patients”. Breast. 13 (5): 431–5. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.011. PMID 15454202.
  33. Becker L, McCurdy LI, Taves DH (2001). “Superficial thrombophlebitis of the breast (Mondor’s disease)”. Can Assoc Radiol J. 52 (3): 193–5. PMID 11436415.
  34. Catania S, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Galimberti V, Bono A, Pluchinotta A (1992). “Mondor’s disease and breast cancer”. Cancer. 69 (9): 2267–70. PMID 1562972.
  35. Kudva YC, Reynolds C, O’Brien T, Powell C, Oberg AL, Crotty TB (2002). Diabetic mastopathy,” or sclerosing lymphocytic lobulitis, is strongly associated with type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes Care. 25 (1): 121–6. PMID 11772912.
  36. Draghi F, Tarantino CC, Madonia L, Ferrozzi G (2011). “Ultrasonography of the male breast”. J Ultrasound. 14 (3): 122–9. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2011.06.004. PMC 3558246. PMID 23397020.
  37. Braunstein GD (2007). “Clinical practice. Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (12): 1229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp070677. PMID 17881754.
  38. Lower EE, Hawkins HH, Baughman RP (2001). “Breast disease in sarcoidosis”. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 18 (3): 301–6. PMID 11587103.
  39. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS (1998). “Fat necrosis in the breast: sonographic features”. Radiology. 206 (1): 261–9. doi:10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423681. PMID 9423681.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

References

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Gynecomastia has the highest prevalence in elderly and neonatal age. Gynecomastia has trimodal age distribution with no racial preference.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • The prevalence of gynecomastia in infants ranges from 60,000 per 100,000 to 90,000 per 100,000.[1]
  • The prevalence of gynecomastia in pubertal age ranges from 4,000 per 100,000 to 69,000 per 100,000.[2]
  • The prevalence of gynecomastia in elderly (50-80 years) ranges from 24,000 per 100,000 to 65,000 per 100,000.[3]

Age

  • Gynecomastia has trimodal distribution.[1]
  • The first peak is found in the neonatal period affecting 60-90 percent of all newborns. Infant transient gynecomastia regresses in two to three weeks after delivery. The second peak is during puberty and it declines in the late teenage years. The last peak is found in elderly with age ranging from 50 to 80years olds.[4]

Race

Gender

Region

  • There is insufficient evidence of gynecomastia distribution on geographical basis.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Braunstein GD (1993). “Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 328 (7): 490–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302183280708. PMID 8421478.
  2. Ma NS, Geffner ME (2008). “Gynecomastia in prepubertal and pubertal men”. Curr Opin Pediatr. 20 (4): 465–70. doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e328305e415. PMID 18622206.
  3. Abaci A, Buyukgebiz A (2007). “Gynecomastia: review”. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 5 (1): 489–99. PMID 17925790.
  4. Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009). “Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management”. Mayo Clin Proc. 84 (11): 1010–5. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60671-X. PMC 2770912. PMID 19880691.
  5. Harlan WR, Grillo GP, Cornoni-Huntley J, Leaverton PE (1979). “Secondary sex characteristics of boys 12 to 17 years of age: the U.S. Health Examination Survey”. J. Pediatr. 95 (2): 293–7. PMID 448573.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]; Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [3]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of gynecomastia include the use of medicationscirrhosis, and hyperthyroidism. The less common risk factors include aromatase overexpression, androgen insensitivity syndrome and testosterone pathway defects.

Risk factors

Risk factors in the development of gynecomastia include:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Common Risk Factors

Less Common Risk Factors

References

  1. Wiseman EH, Chang YH, Lombardino JG (1976). “Piroxicam, a novel anti-inflammatory agent”. Arzneimittelforschung. 26 (7): 1300–3. PMID 12765.
  2. Rose LI, Underwood RH, Newmark SR, Kisch ES, Williams GH (1977). “Pathophysiology of spironolactone-induced gynecomastia”. Ann Intern Med. 87 (4): 398–403. PMID 907238.
  3. Deepinder F, Braunstein GD (2012). “Drug-induced gynecomastia: an evidence-based review”. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 11 (5): 779–95. doi:10.1517/14740338.2012.712109. PMID 22862307.
  4. Braunstein GD (1993). “Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 328 (7): 490–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302183280708. PMID 8421478.
  5. JACOBS EC (1948). “Gynecomastia following severe starvation”. Ann Intern Med. 28 (4): 792–7. PMID 18911010.
  6. Tseng A, Horning SJ, Freiha FS, Resser KJ, Hannigan JF, Torti FM (1985). “Gynecomastia in testicular cancer patients. Prognostic and therapeutic implications”. Cancer. 56 (10): 2534–8. PMID 4042075.
  7. Olivo J, Gordon GG, Rafii F, Southren AL (1975). “Estrogen metabolism in hyperthyroidism and in cirrhosis of the liver”. Steroids. 26 (1): 47–56. PMID 1166483.
  8. Freeman RM, Lawton RL, Fearing MO (1968). “Gynecomastia: an endocrinologic complication of hemodialysis”. Ann Intern Med. 69 (1): 67–72. PMID 5658367.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gynecomastia.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gynecomastia.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

If left untreated patients with gynecomastia may progress to develop psychosocial stresses and rarely breast cancer. The majority of physiological gynecomastia is self-limited. Pathological gynecomastia has an excellent prognosis and responds well to treatment. Pharmacological gynecomastia responds very well to the cessation of the offending agent.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Complications

Complications of gynecomastia include:[4][5][6]

Prognosis

Gynecomastia prognosis is good overall:[7][8][9]

  • Physiological gynecomastia has an excellent prognosis and the majority of physiological gynecomastia resolve spontaneously.
  • Pathological gynecomastia also responds well to treatment or removal of the underlying cause.
  • Pharmacological gynecomastia responds very well to the cessation of the offending agent.
  • Persistent gynecomastia can cause psychological stress and increases the risk of breast cancer.

References

  1. Braunstein GD (1993). “Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 328 (7): 490–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302183280708. PMID 8421478.
  2. Biro FM, Lucky AW, Huster GA, Morrison JA (1990). “Hormonal studies and physical maturation in adolescent gynecomastia”. J. Pediatr. 116 (3): 450–5. PMID 2137877.
  3. Lemaine V, Cayci C, Simmons PS, Petty P (2013). “Gynecomastia in adolescent males”. Semin Plast Surg. 27 (1): 56–61. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1347166. PMC 3706045. PMID 24872741.
  4. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). “Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes”. Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.009 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. Ordaz DL, Thompson JK (2015). “Gynecomastia and psychological functioning: A review of the literature”. Body Image. 15: 141–8. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.08.004. PMID 26408934.
  6. Rew L, Young C, Harrison T, Caridi R (2015). “A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men”. J Adolesc. 43: 206–12. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.06.007. PMID 26151806.
  7. Wiesman, IM.; et al. Gynecomastia: An Outcome Analysis.
  8. Li CC, Fu JP, Chang SC, Chen TM, Chen SG (2012). “Surgical treatment of gynecomastia: complications and outcomes”. Ann Plast Surg. 69 (5): 510–5. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318222834d. PMID 21712702.
  9. Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH (2017). “The Characteristics and Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Adolescent Gynecomastia”. Aesthetic Plast Surg. doi:10.1007/s00266-017-0886-z. PMID 28451801.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case study

Case study

Case #1

Template:Diseases of the pelvis, genitals and breasts


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH