Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Breast lumps


For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Breast mass, Breast lesion

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Breast lumps are considered as one of the prevalent symptoms among women. Breast lumps can be found by individuals or clinical breast examination. Although, breast lumps are often determined as benign masses, they could be the first common presentation of breast cancer and require more clinical and imaging studies and medical interventions. Benign breast disease includes wide range of lesions which originate from either mammary epithelium or other mammary tissues. Breast lumps may be related to vascular, inflammatory or traumatic pathologies. Breast lumps are usually palpable, nodular masses and could be associated with or without particular characteristics. Breast lumps could also be found in children, adolescents and hopefully they are considered as benign tumors.The first step for evaluation of breast lumps is clinical examination then if examination was suspicious later imaging studies such as mammography, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging are required for further evaluation. Breast lumps management depends on disease pattern, available facilities and specialist.

Historical Perspective

Throughout the history many women experienced breast diseases but there were not any courage to express their problem to the public. In 1970s, all women with malignant breast lumps underwent radical mastectomy rather than performing previous biopsies. Although fine needle aspiration biopsy was introduce in 1930, it was used for breast lumps in 1950s. Breast ultrasound was used in 1950s and mammography was found in 1975 to diagnose early stages of breast cancers.

Classification

Breast lumps may be classified according to epithelial hyperplasia into 3 subtypes: non-proliferative, proliferative disease and proliferative disease without atypia. Breast lumps may be classified into 3 sub-types based on histological regions: lobular region, ductal region, different origins.

Pathophysiology

Breast development is influenced by different hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, prolactin, and estradiol. The pathophysiology of breast lumps depends on the histological subtypes. Histological findings of breast lumps are different from each other which lead to diagnosis. It is thought that breast lumps are the result of hormonal events and genetic mutations. Estrogen and progesterone may increase risk of benign proliferative disease to 74% and benign breast lesion in post-menopausal women receiving estrogen with or without progesteron for more than 8 years raise by 1.7 fold. Gene mutations are classified into 3 categories based on cancer risk such as BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 considered as high risk mutations, Homozygous ataxia-telangiectasia, somatic mutation in CHEK2, BRIP1, PALB2 moderate risk mutations, and low risk genes mutation are not determined yet.

Causes

Breast lumps causes can be classified to various groups according to gender and age. Causes of female breast mass could be cancer, inflammatory, infectious, hormonal imbalance, trauma. Male breast enlargement identified as gynecomastia. Causes of gynecomastia may be multifactorial, hormonal imbalance, genetic factors, endocrine factors.Breast lumps may develop among children and adolescents, however, there are probably benign ones and related to peripubertal and pubertal phases.

Differentiating Breast lumps from Other Diseases

Breast lumps must be differentiated from other diseases such as malignancy, cysts, inflammation and non-inflammatory solid lumps. Breast symptoms such as nipple discharge and mastalgia require assessment as well. Differentiating different types of breast lumps are based on imaging findings and breast clinical exam results.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence rate of breast lumps is not particularly clear due to the fact that breast lumps is not considered as a life threatening condition and majority of the women who receives medical therapies or surgeries come into account.The prevalence of benign breast disease is approximately 68% among all breast diseases and the incidence of breast diseases is higher on the left upper/outer quadrant of breast. Fibrocystic diseases are more frequent in age of 40-44 years and fibroadenoma is more frequent between 15-35 years. Fibroadenoma rate is higher in black women. African-American women have worse prognosis and higher mortality rate in comparison European American women.

Risk Factors

Risk factors of breast lumps are generally age (higher cancer risk while aging), past history of breast disease or biopsy, positive familial history in first-degree relatives, genetic mutations such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, endogenous hormonal exposure such as age at menarch, first pregnancy, menopause, breast feeding, and parity, exogenous hormonal exposure such as usage of contraceptive pills and hormonal replacement therapy, and lifestyle factors such as alcohol consumption, inactivity, obesity, and previous history of radiation exposure.

Screening

Screening for breast lumps is recommended by breast examination, ultrasound, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

If benign breast lumps left untreated, those proved to be benign both by clinical examination and cytological diagnosis, do not become malignant and 68% of benign breast lumps resolve by time mostly after 2 years. Benign breast lumps should approved to be benign both clinically and cytologicaly. Because some of breast lumps which thought to be benign ones can turn to be malignant by cytological results. Breast lumps which approved to be benign both clinically and cytologicaly in women under 35 years can resolve over time if do not excised.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Mammography is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of breast lumps in women aged >40 years old. Ultrasound is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of breast lumps in women aged <40 years old. Management and medical therapy of breast lumps depends on women’s age (age> 40 or age <40) and mammography results in women aged > 40 years. In women aged > 40 years; no further evaluation is needed in case of clearly benign mass in mammography; however, ultrasound imaging is required for the rest of the findings mammography. Approach to breast lumps in women >40 years is depended on breast imaging reporting and data systems (BI-RADS) stages. Medical therapy of breast lumps in women< 40 years is depended on ultrasound results and BI-RADS categories.

History and Symptoms

The important key to breast lumps diagnosis is history and physical exams. History must be complete and include all details regarding to age, parity, pregnancy, past history of breast diseases, familial history, and drug history. Common symptoms of breast lumps include breast pain, palpable mass, nipple discharge, galactorrhea.

Physical Examination

Physical examination of patients with breast lumps should perform both in sitting position and supine position to examine all 4 quadrants of breast. Careful physical examination may lead to diagnosis. Breast physical exam should include information about, number, size, location, shape, mobility, consistancy of masses, nipple discharge, and axillary lymph nodes.

Laboratory Findings

There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with breast lumps.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with breast lumps.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with breast lumps.

Ultrasound

Breast ultrasound is the first imaging modality in patients with palpable masses under age 40 years old and is adjunctive modality to mammography for patients older than 40 years. Breast sonography is a type of imaging used to confirm abnormal findings on mammography or MRI. Breast ultrasound improves breast cancer detection rate.

CT scan

There are no CT scan findings associated with breast lumps.

MRI

MRI is considered as the primary imaging modality in selected patients and may be used when results of other imaging modalities are indeterminate. Breast MRI has some indications and does not use regularly. Breast MRI is not the primary modality for diagnosis of breast lumps and does not provide any additional findings to ultrasound and mammographic results and has both false-positive and false-negetive results.

Other Imaging Findings

Mammography is considered as the first and mainstay for evaluation of palpable masses in women over the age of 40 years. Diagnostic mammogram contains particular views by focal compression of specific part of breast tissue.There is standard method for reporting mammographic findings which is called breast imaging reporting and database system (BI-RADS) which is classified into 7 categories.

Other Diagnostic Studies

The only certain method to approve the presence of breast malignancy is breast lump biopsy.The three types of biopsies are core-needle biopsy, open surgical biopsy, and fine needle biopsy. Core-needle biopsy has different types such as ultrasound guided-core needle biopsy, stereotactic-guided core-needle biopsy, MRI-guided core-needle biopsy, and freehand core-needle biopsy. Core-needle biopsy has high sensitivity and specificity. Triple test score is used by surgeons for assessment of palpable breast lumps. Classic type of triple test includes clinical breast examination, FNA, and mammography and modified version includes clinical breast examination, core-needle biopsy and ultrasound.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

There is no specific medical therapy for breast lump. However, there are certain medications that may be used prophylactically to reduce the risk of transformation of breast lump into breast carcinoma.

Surgery

Surgical management of breast lumps depends on the type of masses based on core-needle biopsy. Atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia. Multiple, peripheral and atypic papillomas, large sclerosing adenosis and radical scar >10mm, atypic and enlargic fibroadenomas, desmoid tumor, mammary fibromatosis, phyllodes tumor, symptomatic and large pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia requires surgical consultation and excision. The rest of breast lumps require observation and follow-up. The final decision for excisional biopsy is based on recommendations from pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons.

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of breast lumps.

Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention of breast lumps consists of modifiable risk factors and preventive factors to decrease the rates of breast cancer. The protective factors include controlling alcohol consumption, weight control, physical activity, healthy diet, breast feeding, prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, hormonal replacement therapy avoidance, and use of tamoxifen for high risk women aged > 35 years. In order to reduce breast cancer recurrence, surveillance and follow-up by either physical examination and mammography are required.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Throughout the history many women experienced breast diseases but there were not any courage to express their problem to the public. In 1970s, all women with malignant breast lumps underwent radical mastectomy rather than performing previous biopsies. Although fine needle aspiration biopsy was introduce in 1930, it was used for breast lumps in 1950s. Breast ultrasound was used in 1950s and mammography was found in 1975 to diagnose early stages of breast cancers.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

  • Breast cancer influenced women throughout the history; however, American women did not speak about the breast cancer till 20th century.[1]
  • The American Society for the Control of Cancer (ASCC) established in 1913 with Elsie Mead and Marjorie Illigand leadership and changed to American Cancer Society in 1945.[2]
  • Babette Rosmond and Shirley Temple Black who were both diagnosed with breast cancer wrote a book about finding right to decide for performing biopsy before other treatment for breast lumps.[3][4]
  • Martin and Ellis introduce fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in 1930.[5]
  • The Scandinavians used FNAB for diagnosis of palpable breast lumps in 1950s.[6]
  • Mammography technique for detection of early stage of breast cancer has found over 80 years ago especially in 1975.[7][8]
  • The first application for using breast sonography was in 1950. Wild and Neal explained acoustical findings of both benign and malignant breast tumor.[9]

Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies

References

  1. Bristow NK (2002). “Battling breast cancer. [Review of: Lerner, BH. The breast cancer wars: hope, fear, and the pursuit of a cure in twentieth-century America. Oxford University Press, 2001]”. Rev Am Hist. 30 (1): 114–23. PMID 11949674.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Osuch JR, Silk K, Price C, Barlow J, Miller K, Hernick A; et al. (2012). “A historical perspective on breast cancer activism in the United States: from education and support to partnership in scientific research”. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 21 (3): 355–62. doi:10.1089/jwh.2011.2862. PMC 3298674. PMID 22132763.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Crile, G. (1973). What women should know about the breast cancer controversy. New York: Macmillan
  4. Lerner BH (2001). “No shrinking violet: Rose Kushner and the rise of American breast cancer activism”. West J Med. 174 (5): 362–5. PMC 1071404. PMID 11342526.
  5. Martin HE, Ellis EB (1930). “BIOPSY BY NEEDLE PUNCTURE AND ASPIRATION”. Ann Surg. 92 (2): 169–81. PMC 1398218. PMID 17866350.
  6. Bauermeister DE (1980). “The role and limitations of frozen section and needle aspiration biopsy in breast cancer diagnosis”. Cancer. 46 (4 Suppl): 947–9. PMID 7397673.
  7. Eisenberg, R. L. (1992). Radiology: an illustrated history. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book
  8. Feig SA: “Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.” Radiologic clinics of North America, vol. 25, no. 5, 1987, pp. 897-911, https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/3306772/Mammography_equipment:_principles_features_selection_. Accessed December 18, 2018
  9. Dempsey, P. J. (1988). Breast Sonography: Historical Perspective, Clinical Application, and Image Interpretation. Ultrasound Quarterly, 6(1), 69.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Breast lumps may be classified according to epithelial hyperplasia into 3 subtypes: non-proliferative, proliferative disease and proliferative disease without atypia. Breast lumps may be classified into 3 sub-types based on histological regions: lobular region, ductal region, different origins.

Classification

Classification of breast lumps based on epithelial hyperplasia:[1][2][3]

Classification of benign breast lesion according to histological region:[7]

References

  1. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K; et al. (2005). “Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer”. N Engl J Med. 353 (3): 229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa044383. PMID 16034008.
  2. London SJ, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Colditz GA (1992). “A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer”. JAMA. 267 (7): 941–4. PMID 1734106.
  3. Dupont WD, Page DL (1985). “Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease”. N Engl J Med. 312 (3): 146–51. doi:10.1056/NEJM198501173120303. PMID 3965932.
  4. Love SM, Gelman RS, Silen W (1982). “Sounding board. Fibrocystic “disease” of the breast–a nondisease?”. N Engl J Med. 307 (16): 1010–4. doi:10.1056/NEJM198210143071611. PMID 7110289.
  5. Dupont WD, Page DL (1985). “Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease”. N Engl J Med. 312 (3): 146–51. doi:10.1056/NEJM198501173120303. PMID 3965932.
  6. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982). “Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only”. Cancer. 49 (4): 751–8. PMID 6275978.
  7. Lanyi, M (2003). Mammography : diagnosis and pathological analysis. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 9783540441137.
  8. Lai EC, Chan WC, Ma TK, Tang AP, Poon CS, Leong HT (2005). “The role of conservative treatment in idiopathic granulomatous mastitis”. Breast J. 11 (6): 454–6. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00127.x. PMID 16297091.
  9. Kudva YC, Reynolds C, O’Brien T, Powell C, Oberg AL, Crotty TB (2002). Diabetic mastopathy,” or sclerosing lymphocytic lobulitis, is strongly associated with type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes Care. 25 (1): 121–6. PMID 11772912.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Breast development is influenced by different hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, prolactin, and estradiol. The pathophysiology of breast lumps depends on the histological subtypes. Histological findings of breast lumps are different from each other which lead to diagnosis. It is thought that breast lumps are the result of hormonal events and genetic mutations. Estrogen and progesterone may increase risk of benign proliferative disease to 74% and benign breast lesion in post-menopausal women receiving estrogen with or without progesteron for more than 8 years raise by 1.7 fold. Gene mutations are classified into 3 categories based on cancer risk such as BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 considered as high risk mutations, Homozygous ataxia-telangiectasia, somatic mutation in CHEK2, BRIP1, PALB2 moderate risk mutations, and low risk genes mutation are not determined yet.

Pathophysiology

Physiology

Histological changes of breast

Histological changes of breast undergo continuous changes throughout the life:[4]

  • Fibrocystic disease
    • Histological apperance change from predominance of ducts, lobules to fibrous change, and cyst formation
    • Fibrocystic changes are not associated with breast cancer
  • Diagnostic subtypes and histologic subtypes are described according to their relative risk for cancer as below:[7]
Diagnostic Subtypes
Diagnostic Subtypes Breast cancer relative risk
Non-proliferative disease 1.17
Proliferative disease without atypia 1.76
Benign breast disease 2.07
Atypical hyperplasia 3.93
Histologic Subtypes
Histological subtypes Relative risk|Breast cancer relative risk
Adenosis 2.00
Atypical ductal hyperplasia 3.28
Atypical lobular hyperplasia 3.92
Cysts 1.55
Fibroadenoma 1.41
Papilloma 2.06
Histological findings of breast lumps
Breast lumps Histological findings
Atypical hyperplasia[8]
  • Clonal neoplastic proliferations is present.
Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)[9]
  • Localized intraductal proliferations,having some microscopic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), usually associated with calcification, duct spaces consist of complex proliferation of monotonous luminal-type cells by creating bridging feature.
  • Differentiation of ADH from DCIS : ADH has less cytological atypia than DCIS.
  • Distribution in severe ADH is restricted to less than 3 contiguous ducts and less than 0.2 cm in size.
Lobular neoplasia[10]
  • Associated to decrease expression or missing expression of E-cadherine, lobular neoplasia is considered to be as incidental findings in during microcalcification evaluation.
Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)[11]
  • ALH is containing monomorphic cells and distend into lobular acini and adjacent terminal ducts.
  • Differentiation between ALH and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) associated with quantitative degrees about lobules and architecture feature.
Apocrine proliferative lesions[12]
  • Apocrine atypia is described by a 3-fold variation in nuclear size or by cribriform structures with nuclear atypia, associated with sclerosing adenosis or complex sclerosing lesion.
Columnar cell lesions (CCL)[13]
  • CCL has heterogeneous set of lesions distinguished by reduplication and microcystic changes in lobular acini, elevated estrogen receptor expression, increased proliferative rate, associated with sclerosing adenosis, clacification and pleomorphic appearnace.
Papillary lesions[14]
  • Arborescent fibrovascular stalk lined to the myoepithelium are present.
Radical scars and complex sclerosing lesions[15]
  • Radial scars are tumor like lesions with stellate nidus of dense elastotic collagen, surrounding with epithelial elements and sclerosing adenosis.
  • Complex sclerosing lesions are kind of radial scars larger than 1 cm which has distorted glandular tissue.
Fibroadenoma[16]
Phyllodes tumor[17]
Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia[18]
Sclerosing adenosis[19]

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Associated Conditions

  • There are no other associated conditions with breast lumps.

Gross pathology

Gross findings Gross pathology
  • Fibrotic capsule and infiltrated the surrounding tissue[33]
  • Gray-white color and moderately increased consistency
Gross feature of fibroadenoma Source: Netha Hussain , from Wikimedia Commons
  • Stellate area of cancer 2cm in diameter
  • Felt as a hard mobile mass
  • Histology as a moderately well differentiated duct carcinoma
Gross image of breast cancer Source: John Hayman , from Wikimedia Commons

Microscopic Pathology

Pathologic findings Microscopic image
Histopathologic image of Phyllodes tumor Source: Nephron, from Wikimedia Commons
  • Sclerosing adenosis microscopic pathology has increased numbers of small
    breast acini with collapsed lumens, fibrosis surrounds the acini,
    considered as benign lesion with increased risk of breast cancer.
Histopathologic image of sclerosing adenosis Source: Nephron, from Wikimedia Commons
Histopathologic image of atypical ductal hyperplasia Source: Nephron, from Wikimedia Commons

References

  1. Going JJ, Anderson TJ, Battersby S, MacIntyre CC (1988). “Proliferative and secretory activity in human breast during natural and artificial menstrual cycles”. Am J Pathol. 130 (1): 193–204. PMC 1880536. PMID 3337211.
  2. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJ (1987). “Aberrations of normal development and involution (ANDI): a new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature of benign breast disorders”. Lancet. 2 (8571): 1316–9. PMID 2890912.
  3. Santen RJ. Benign Breast Disease in Women. [Updated 2018 May 25]. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278994/
  4. Love, Susan M.; Sue Gelman, Rebecca; silen, William (1982). “Fibrocystic Disease of the Breast — A Nondisease?”. New England Journal of Medicine. 307 (16): 1010–1014. doi:10.1056/NEJM198210143071611. ISSN 0028-4793.
  5. Pearlman MD, Griffin JL (2010). “Benign breast disease”. Obstet Gynecol. 116 (3): 747–58. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ee9fc7. PMID 20733462.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Huh SJ, Oh H, Peterson MA, Almendro V, Hu R, Bowden M; et al. (2016). “The Proliferative Activity of Mammary Epithelial Cells in Normal Tissue Predicts Breast Cancer Risk in Premenopausal Women”. Cancer Res. 76 (7): 1926–34. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1927. PMC 4873436. PMID 26941287.
  7. Dyrstad SW, Yan Y, Fowler AM, Colditz GA (2015). “Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis”. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 149 (3): 569–75. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3254-6. PMID 25636589.
  8. Lakhani SR, Collins N, Stratton MR, Sloane JP (1995). “Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: clonal proliferation with loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 16q and 17p”. J Clin Pathol. 48 (7): 611–5. PMC 502709. PMID 7560165.
  9. Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF, Page DL (2001). “Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting”. Am J Surg Pathol. 25 (8): 1017–21. PMID 11474285.
  10. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985). “Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study”. Cancer. 55 (11): 2698–708. PMID 2986821.
  11. Middleton LP, Sneige N, Coyne R, Shen Y, Dong W, Dempsey P; et al. (2014). “Most lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed on core needle biopsy can be managed clinically with radiologic follow-up in a multidisciplinary setting”. Cancer Med. 3 (3): 492–9. doi:10.1002/cam4.223. PMC 4101740. PMID 24639339.
  12. Guray M, Sahin AA (2006). “Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management”. Oncologist. 11 (5): 435–49. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-435. PMID 16720843.
  13. Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A (2003). “Columnar cell lesions of the breast”. Adv Anat Pathol. 10 (3): 113–24. PMID 12717115.
  14. Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WC (2008). “Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191 (3): 700–7. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3483. PMID 18716096.
  15. Krishnamurthy S, Bevers T, Kuerer H, Yang WT (2012). “Multidisciplinary considerations in the management of high-risk breast lesions”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198 (2): W132–40. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7799. PMID 22268202.
  16. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K; et al. (2005). “Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer”. N Engl J Med. 353 (3): 229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa044383. PMID 16034008.
  17. Karim RZ, Gerega SK, Yang YH, Spillane A, Carmalt H, Scolyer RA; et al. (2009). “Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a clinicopathological analysis of 65 cases from a single institution”. Breast. 18 (3): 165–70. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2009.03.001. PMID 19329316.
  18. Hoda SA, Rosen PP (2004). “Observations on the pathologic diagnosis of selected unusual lesions in needle core biopsies of breast”. Breast J. 10 (6): 522–7. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21412.x. PMID 15569209.
  19. Ferrara A (2011). “Benign breast disease”. Radiol Technol. 82 (5): 447M–62M. PMID 21572066.
  20. Rohan TE, Miller AB (1999). “Hormone replacement therapy and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast”. Eur J Cancer Prev. 8 (2): 123–30. PMID 10335458.
  21. Rohan TE, Negassa A, Chlebowski RT, Lasser NL, McTiernan A, Schenken RS; et al. (2008). “Estrogen plus progestin and risk of benign proliferative breast disease”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 17 (9): 2337–43. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0380. PMC 2584343. PMID 18725513.
  22. Tan-Chiu E, Wang J, Costantino JP, Paik S, Butch C, Wickerham DL; et al. (2003). “Effects of tamoxifen on benign breast disease in women at high risk for breast cancer”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95 (4): 302–7. PMID 12591986.
  23. Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, Thor AD, Allred DC, Clark GM; et al. (2000). “Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 124 (7): 966–78. doi:10.1043/0003-9985(2000)124<0966:PFIBC>2.0.CO;2. PMID 10888772.
  24. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM (1998). “Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis”. Mod Pathol. 11 (2): 155–68. PMID 9504686.
  25. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ; et al. (2007). “American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer”. J Clin Oncol. 25 (1): 118–45. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775. PMID 17159189.
  26. Hicks DG, Kulkarni S (2008). “HER2+ breast cancer: review of biologic relevance and optimal use of diagnostic tools”. Am J Clin Pathol. 129 (2): 263–73. doi:10.1309/99AE032R9FM8WND1. PMID 18208807.
  27. O’Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC (1998). “Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 90 (9): 697–703. PMID 9586667.
  28. Sharif S, Moran A, Huson SM, Iddenden R, Shenton A, Howard E; et al. (2007). “Women with neurofibromatosis 1 are at a moderately increased risk of developing breast cancer and should be considered for early screening”. J Med Genet. 44 (8): 481–4. doi:10.1136/jmg.2007.049346. PMC 2597938. PMID 17369502.
  29. Seal S, Thompson D, Renwick A, Elliott A, Kelly P, Barfoot R; et al. (2006). “Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles”. Nat Genet. 38 (11): 1239–41. doi:10.1038/ng1902. PMID 17033622.
  30. Wong MW, Nordfors C, Mossman D, Pecenpetelovska G, Avery-Kiejda KA, Talseth-Palmer B; et al. (2011). “BRIP1, PALB2, and RAD51C mutation analysis reveals their relative importance as genetic susceptibility factors for breast cancer”. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 127 (3): 853–9. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1443-0. PMID 21409391.
  31. Thompson D, Duedal S, Kirner J, McGuffog L, Last J, Reiman A; et al. (2005). “Cancer risks and mortality in heterozygous ATM mutation carriers”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 97 (11): 813–22. doi:10.1093/jnci/dji141. PMID 15928302.
  32. Lalloo F, Evans DG (2012). “Familial breast cancer”. Clin Genet. 82 (2): 105–14. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01859.x. PMID 22356477.
  33. Gashi-Luci LH, Limani RA, Kurshumliu FI (2009). “Invasive ductal carcinoma within fibroadenoma: a case report”. Cases J. 2: 174. doi:10.1186/1757-1626-2-174. PMC 2783130. PMID 19946485.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jyostna Chouturi, M.B.B.S [2], João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3], Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[4]

Overview

Breast lumps causes can be classified to various groups according to gender and age. Causes of female breast mass could be cancer, inflammatory, infectious, hormonal imbalance, trauma. Male breast enlargement identified as gynecomastia. Causes of gynecomastia may be multifactorial, hormonal imbalance, genetic factors, endocrine factors.Breast lumps may develop among children and adolescents, however, there are probably benign ones and related to peripubertal and pubertal phases.

Causes In Female

Life Threatening Causes

There are no life-threatening causes.[1]

Common Causes In Female

The most common causes of breast lumps in females are:[1][2][3][4][5]

Causes In Female by Organ System

Cardiovascular Angiosarcoma of the breast, Mondor’s disease
Chemical/Poisoning No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic Breast abscess,Cysts of Montgomery, epithelioma of the nipple, hives, intraductal papilloma, lymphocytoma cutis, Paget’s disease of the breast, retroareolar cyst, sclerosing adenosis, sebaceous cyst, skin lumps, Zuska’s disease
Drug Side Effect Aldactone, aldomet (alphamethyldopa),alefacept, beta blockers, bicalutamide, casodex, chlorpromazine, cyclosporine, dalmane , digitalis, estazolam, etonogestrel, hormone replacement therapy, efalizumab, estradiol, estrogen, estrogen and progestin, etanercept, etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol, flurazepam, flutamide, itraconazole, implanon, medroxyprogesterone, metoclopramide, norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol, nilandron, nizoral, oral contraceptive pills,progestin
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine Aberration of normal development and involution (ANDI), breast fibroadenoma, chronic cystic mastitis, fibro-adenosis of the newborn, fibroadenoma, galactocele, giant fibroadenoma, glandular thickening due to hormonal changes of pregnancy, hormone replacement therapy,hyalinized fibroadenoma, lactation, premenstrual syndrome, puberty, simple cyst
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic No underlying causes
Genetic[5] Aberration of normal development and involution (ANDI), adenoid cystic carcinoma, apocrine metaplasia, apocrine or squamous metaplasia, apocrine papillary carcinoma, ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygosity, breast cancer, cancer, colloidal breast cancer, Cowden syndrome, cyclosporine, cyst wall cancer, ductal carcinoma, extramedullary myeloid tumor, giant mammary hamartoma, hamartoma, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, Hodgkin’s disease, inflammatory breast cancer, juvenile secretory carcinoma, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, lymphoma, malignant carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, metastatic breast cancer, metastatic cancer, mucinous carcinoma, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, primary breast cancer, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome
Hematologic Extramedullary myeloid tumor, Hodgkin’s disease, lymphoma, medullary carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcoma, venous thrombosis
Iatrogenic Abscess, alefacept, breast abscess, breast fat necrosis, breast implant, complicated cyst, cyclosporine, efalizumab, estradiol, estrogen, estrogen and progestin, etanercept, etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol, hematoma, medroxyprogesterone, norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol, postoperative scar/hematoma, progestin, radial scar, radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast
Infectious Disease[6] Abscess, acute mastitis, benign inflammatory periductal mastitis, breast abscess, breast cyst, breast infection, tuberculosis of the breast
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic No underlying causes
Neurologic Ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygosity
Nutritional/Metabolic ginseng
Obstetric/Gynecologic[7] Aberration of normal development and involution (ANDI), adenoid cystic carcinoma, apocrine metaplasia, apocrine or squamous metaplasia, apocrine papillary carcinoma, benign inflammatory periductal mastitis, breast abscess, breast cancer, breast duct papilloma, breast fat necrosis, breast fibroadenoma, breast implant, breast injury,breast trauma, chronic cystic mastitis, colloidal breast cancer, complicated cyst, cowden syndrome, cyst wall cancer, cystosarcoma phyllodes, cysts of Montgomery, duct ectasia of breast, ductal carcinoma, epithelioma of the nipple, fat necrosis, fibro-adeno-lipoma, fibro-adenosis of the newborn, fibroadenoma, galactocele, giant fibroadenoma, giant mammary hamartoma, glandular thickening due to hormonal changes of pregnancy, gynecomastia, hyalinized fibroadenoma, intraductal papilloma, lactation, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, lobular neoplasia, lymphocytic mastitis, mammary duct ectasia, mastitis, metastatic breast cancer, mucinous carcinoma, nipple conditions., paget’s disease of the breast, periductal mastitis, phyllodes tumor, plasma cell mastitis, primary breast cancer, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, retroareolar cyst, ruptured cyst or duct, sclerosing adenosis, tuberculosis of the breast, Zuska’s disease
Oncologic[8] Adenoid cystic carcinoma, angiosarcoma of the breast, apocrine papillary carcinoma, ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygosity, benign breast disease, breast cancer, cancer, colloidal breast cancer, cyst wall cancer, cystosarcoma phyllodes, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, ductal carcinoma, epithelioma of the nipple, extramedullary myeloid tumor, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, Hodgkin’s disease, inflammatory breast cancer, juvenile secretory carcinoma, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, lymphoma, malignant carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, metastatic breast cancer, metastatic cancer, metastatic cancer, mucinous carcinoma, paget’s disease of the breast, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, phyllodes tumor, primary breast cancer, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast, rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcoma, secretory breast carcinoma
Ophthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose/Toxicity No underlying causes
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal/Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy Benign inflammatory periductal mastitis, cysts of Montgomery, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, hives, inflammatory breast cancer, intramammary lymph node, lymphatic obstruction, lymphocytoma cutis, lymphocytic mastitis, mastitis, Mondor’s disease, periductal mastitis, plasma cell mastitis, Zuska’s disease
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma Breast fat necrosis, breast injury, breast trauma, blow on the breast, fat necrosis, hematoma, ruptured cyst or duct, traumatic fat necrosis,
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous Fibro-adeno-lipoma, hypertrophy, lipoma, lymphatic obstruction, oil cyst, postoperative scar/hematoma, radial scar, ruptured cyst or duct, venous thrombosis,

Causes In Female In Alphabetical Order

Causes In Males

Life-Threatening Causes

There are no life-threatening causes.

Common Causes In Male

Breast enlargement in male adolescents is defined as gynecomastia. Common causes of breast lumps in male include:[9][10][11][12][13][14]

Causes in Male by Organ System

Cardiovascular[15] Cantalamessa-baldini-ambrosi syndrome
Chemical/Poisoning No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic Cantalamessa-baldini-ambrosi syndrome, gingival fibromatosis hypertrichosis, H syndrome, Pachydermoperiostosis ,
Drug Side Effect Aldactone, bicalutamide, chloropromazine, cimetidine, flutamide, itraconazole, metoclopramide, nizoral
Ear Nose Throat Gingival fibromatosis hypertrichosis, H syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa, deafness, mental retardation, hypogonadism- syndrome
Endocrine[16] 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency , Androgen insensitivity syndrome , Brugschs syndrome, Camera-marugo-cohen syndrome, Cantalamessa-baldini-ambrosi syndrome, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia 17-alpha-hydroxylase deficiency, 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, Empty sella syndrome , Feminization, Forbes-Albright syndrome , luteinizing hormone releasing hormone deficiency, Gynecomastia, H syndrome, Hanhart syndrome, Heller-nelson syndrome, Hormone replacement therapy, Hyperprolactinemia, Klinefelter syndrome, Lactotroph adenoma, Newborn infant breast swelling, Obal syndrome, Partial androgen insensitivity, Primrose syndrome, pseudohermaphroditism male,Puberty, Salvioli syndrome, Sohval-Soffer syndrome, Summitt syndrome, Tang Hsi Ryu syndrome, Vasquez Hurst Sotos syndrome, Wilson turner syndrome, XX male syndrome, de la chapelle syndrome
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic Cirrhosis of the liver, Hepatocellular carcinoma (fibrolamellar variant), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, Tang Hsi Ryu syndrome
Genetic[12] 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, 46,XX testicular disorder of sex development, Androgen insensitivity syndrome , Brugschs syndrome, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia 17-alpha-hydroxylase deficiency, 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, Fragile X syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Lesch-Nyhan’s syndrome, Obal syndrome, Summitt syndrome, Tang Hsi Ryu syndrome, Vasquez Hurst Sotos syndrome, XX male syndrome, de la chapelle syndrome
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic No underlying causes
Infectious Disease Lymphatic filariasis,
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic Brugschs syndrome, Camera-marugo-cohen syndrome, Lesch-Nyhan’s syndrome, Salvioli syndrome, Sohval-Soffer syndrome,Summitt syndrome
Neurologic Camera-marugo-cohen syndrome, Fragile X syndrome,progressive spinobulbar muscular atrophy, Retinitis pigmentosa, deafness, mental retardation, hypogonadism, Sohval-Soffer syndrome, Spinal muscular atrophy, Summitt syndrome, Tang Hsi Ryu syndrome, Vasquez Hurst Sotos syndrome, wilson turner syndrome,
Nutritional/Metabolic No underlying causes
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic Breast cancer
Ophthalmologic Cantalamessa-baldini-ambrosi syndrome, Obal syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa, deafness, mental retardation, hypogonadism.
Overdose/Toxicity No underlying causes
Psychiatric sexual arousal
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal/Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy No underlying causes
Sexual sexual arousal
Trauma No underlying causes
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous No underlying causes

Causes in Male in Alphabetical order

Causes in Children

Causes in Male Adolescents

Causes in Female Adolescents

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Santen RJ. Benign Breast Disease in Women. [Updated 2018 May 25]. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278994/
  2. Rohan TE, Negassa A, Chlebowski RT, Lasser NL, McTiernan A, Schenken RS; et al. (2008). “Estrogen plus progestin and risk of benign proliferative breast disease”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 17 (9): 2337–43. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0380. PMC 2584343. PMID 18725513.
  3. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). “Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes”. Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMC 5922622. PMID https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00437-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00437-1 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. Ferzoco RM, Ruddy KJ (2016). “The Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer”. Curr Oncol Rep. 18 (1): 1. doi:10.1007/s11912-015-0487-4. PMID 26694922.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Informed Health Online [Internet]. Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2006-. Breast cancer: Overview. 2013 Nov 6 [Updated 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279422/
  6. Gollapalli V, Liao J, Dudakovic A, Sugg SL, Scott-Conner CE, Weigel RJ (2010). “Risk factors for development and recurrence of primary breast abscesses”. J Am Coll Surg. 211 (1): 41–8. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.007. PMID 20610247.
  7. Yu JH, Kim MJ, Cho H, Liu HJ, Han SJ, Ahn TG (2013). “Breast diseases during pregnancy and lactation”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 56 (3): 143–59. doi:10.5468/ogs.2013.56.3.143. PMC 3784111. PMID 24327995.
  8. Sharma GN, Dave R, Sanadya J, Sharma P, Sharma KK (2010). “Various types and management of breast cancer: an overview”. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 1 (2): 109–26. PMC 3255438. PMID 22247839.
  9. Ormandy CJ, Hall RE, Manning DL, Robertson JF, Blamey RW, Kelly PA; et al. (1997). “Coexpression and cross-regulation of the prolactin receptor and sex steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82 (11): 3692–9. doi:10.1210/jcem.82.11.4361. PMID 9360527.
  10. Durmaz E, Ozmert EN, Erkekoglu P, Giray B, Derman O, Hincal F; et al. (2010). “Plasma phthalate levels in pubertal gynecomastia”. Pediatrics. 125 (1): e122–9. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0724. PMID 20008419.
  11. Braunstein GD (2007). “Clinical practice. Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (12): 1229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp070677. PMID 17881754.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Swerdloff RS, Ng JCM. Gynecomastia: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. [Updated 2015 Aug 3]. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279105/
  13. Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009). “Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management”. Mayo Clin Proc. 84 (11): 1010–5. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60671-X. PMC 2770912. PMID 19880691.
  14. McKiernan JF, Hull D (1981). “Breast development in the newborn”. Arch Dis Child. 56 (7): 525–9. PMC 1627340. PMID 7271286.
  15. Al Qassabi SS, Al-Harthi SM, Al-Osali ME (2015). “Mixed gynecomastia”. Saudi Med J. 36 (9): 1115–7. doi:10.15537/smj.2015.9.11778. PMC 4613638. PMID 26318471.
  16. Ismail AA, Barth JH (2001). “Endocrinology of gynaecomastia”. Ann Clin Biochem. 38 (Pt 6): 596–607. doi:10.1258/0004563011900993. PMID 11732643.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Greydanus DE, Matytsina L, Gains M (2006). “Breast disorders in children and adolescents”. Prim Care. 33 (2): 455–502. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2006.02.002. PMID 16713771.
  18. Kaplowitz P, Bloch C, Section on Endocrinology, American Academy of Pediatrics (2016). “Evaluation and Referral of Children With Signs of Early Puberty”. Pediatrics. 137 (1). doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3732. PMID 26668298.
  19. 19.0 19.1 De Silva NK, Brandt ML (2006). “Disorders of the breast in children and adolescents, Part 2: breast masses”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 19 (6): 415–8. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.09.002. PMID 17174833.
  20. Braunstein GD (2007). “Clinical practice. Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (12): 1229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp070677. PMID 17881754.
  21. Deepinder F, Braunstein GD (2012). “Drug-induced gynecomastia: an evidence-based review”. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 11 (5): 779–95. doi:10.1517/14740338.2012.712109. PMID 22862307.
  22. Templeman C, Hertweck SP (2000). “Breast disorders in the pediatric and adolescent patient”. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 27 (1): 19–34. PMID 10693180.
  23. Sanders LM, Sharma P, El Madany M, King AB, Goodman KS, Sanders AE (2018). “Clinical breast concerns in low-risk pediatric patients: practice review with proposed recommendations”. Pediatr Radiol. 48 (2): 186–195. doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4007-6. PMID 29080125.
  24. Parker SJ, Harries SA (2001). “Phyllodes tumours”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (909): 428–35. PMC 1760996. PMID 11423590.
  25. Pistolese CA, Tanga I, Cossu E, Perretta T, Yamgoue M, Bonanno E; et al. (2009). “A phyllodes tumor in a child”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 22 (3): e21–4. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2007.11.006. PMID 19539191.
  26. Schwartz GF (1982). “Benign neoplasms and “inflammations” of the breast”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 25 (2): 373–85. PMID 6286199.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Differentiating Breast lumps from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2], Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[3]

Overview

Breast lumps must be differentiated from other diseases such as malignancy, cysts, inflammation and non-inflammatory solid lumps. Breast symptoms such as nipple discharge and mastalgia require assessment as well. Differentiating different types of breast lumps are based on imaging findings and breast clinical exam results.

Differentiating Breast lumps from other Diseases

ABBREVIATIONS
LAP=Lymphadenopathy, HRT=Hormonal replacement therapy, FNA=Fine needle aspiration, DCIS=Ductal carcinoma in-situ

Diseases Benign or

Malignant

Clinical manifestation Paraclinical findings Gold standard diagnosis
Demography History Symptoms Signs Histopathology Imaging
Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP
Fibroadenoma[1] + ±
  • Solitary
  • Well-defined
  • Mobile mass
Ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid mass
Breast cyst[2]
  • May resolve after aspiration
  • Further evaluation for unresolved masses
+ ±
  • Solitary
  • Cluster of small masses or an ill-defined mass
  • Smooth, firm, and frequently tender
  • Nonproliferative breast lesions
Ultrasound:
  • Simple cyst: Well circumscribed, posterior acoustic enhancement without internal echoes
  • Complicated cyst: Homogenous low-level internal echoes due to without solid components
  • Complex cyst: Thick walls greater than 0.5 mm with solid component
Fibrocystic change[3]
  • Unknown prevalence among adolescents
  • >50% in women of reproductive age
+ + ±
  • Nonproliferative breast lesions
Ultrasound:
  • Small cysts in mammary zone
  • Fibroglandular tissue around the mass
Galactocele[4][5] + ± ± Mammography:
  • Intermediate mass in absence of classic fat-fluid level

Ultrasound:

  • Complex mass
Cysts of montgomery[6]
  • Most common in age of 10-20 years old
  • More than 80% resolve spontaneously
  • Drainage is essential in rare cases
+ ± ±
  • Asymptomatic subareolar mass
  • Drainage of clear to brownish fluid
± Ultrasound:
  • Single cystic lesion in retroareolar area
Hamartoma[7]
  • Common in women older than 35 years old
± ± Mammography:
  • Well-described
  • Discrete, solid, and encapsulated lesion
Breast abscess[8][9]
  • Complication of lactational mastitis in 14% of cases
  • Common among African-American women, heavy smokers , and obese patients
+ + + Ultrasound:
  • Fluid collection
Mastitis[10][11] ± + ± + Breast parenchyma inflammation: Ultrasound:
  • Ill-defined area with hyperechogenicity with inflamed fat lobules
  • Skin thickening
Diseases Benign or
Malignant
Demography History Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP Histopathology Imaging Gold standard diagnosis
Breast carcinoma[12][13][14]
  • Most common diagnosed cancer among women
  • Leading cause of cancer death in women 40-49 years old
+ ±
  • Hard
  • Immobile
  • Solitary
  • Irregular margin
± ± Mammography:

Ultrasound:

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)[15][16] ± ±
  • May have normal physical exam
Mammography:
Microinvasive breast cancer[17]
  • Rare
  • Commonly referred to DCIS with microinvasion
  • Average age 50-60 years old
+ ±
  • Solitary
  • Firm palpable mass
±
  • Associated with high grade DCIS
Mammography:
Breast sarcoma[18]
  • Rare type, < 1% of all breast malignancies
  • Average age of between 45-50 years
+
  • Well-defined
  • Firm mass
± Mammography:
  • Noncalcified oval mass Indistinct margins
Phyllodes tumor[19][20] ±
  • Smooth and multinodular
  • Well-defined
  • Firm mass
  • Mobile
  • Nonepithelial breast neoplasm with average size of 5 cm
Ultrasound:
  • Solid mass
  • Hypoechoic
  • Well-circumscribed

Mammography:

  • Smooth mass
  • Polylobulated mass
Lymphoma[21][22]
  • Extremely rare ( 0.04%-0.5%)
  • Average age 55-60 years
+
  • Well-defined, firm mass
  • Multiple
± Mammography:
Duct ectasia[23]
  • Usually resolve spontaneously
± ± ±
  • Usually asymptomatic
  • Distention of subareolar ducts
Ultrasound:
  • Dilated milk ducts
  • Fluid-filled ducts
Intraductal papilloma[24]
  • Common in women between 35-55 years old
+ ± ±
  • Solitary or multiple lesion
  • Large lump near nipple
  • Growth of papillary cell into a lumen
Ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid nodule
Lipoma[25]
  • Common between age of 40-60 years old
  • Benign tumors
  • May experience recurrence
+
  • Solitary
  • Mobile
  • Soft mass
Ultrasound:
  • Well-Circumscribed
  • Hypoechoic lesion
Sclerosing adenosis[26][27]
  • Recurrent pain during mensturation
  • May present as a mass or incidental finding on mammogram
  • No treatment is needed
± +
  • Multiple lesion
  • Firm
  • Tender nodules
±
  • Proliferative disease
Mammography:
Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia[28][29]
  • Common in reproductive age women
+
  • Solitary firm mass
  • Thickening
Mammography and ultrasound:
  • Well-defined
  • Solid mass
  • Noncalcified
Mondor’s disease[30][31]
  • Benign and self-limiting disease
  • Resolve after 4-6 weeks
+ +
  • Thick and tender cord on breast skin
+
  • N/A
Ultrasound:
  • Tubular anechoic structure
  • Multiple narrowing areas
Diseases Benign or
Malignant
Demography History Mass Mastalgia Nipple discharge Breast exam Skin changes LAP Histopathology Imaging Gold standard diagnosis
Diabetic mastopathy[32]
  • Suspicious breast mass
  • After diagnosis, excision is not required
+
  • Ill-defined mass
  • Immobile
Ultrasound:
  • Irregular mass
  • Hypoechoic
  • Dense lesion
Gynecomastia[33][34]
  • Benign breast tissue swelling among men and boys around puberty
+ ± ±
  • Unilateral or bilateral firm mass
  • Breast swelling
  • Rubbery mass
Ultrasound:
Sarcoidosis[35]
  • Rare in patients with systemic involvement
+
  • Firm mass
  • Hard mass
Mammography:
  • Irregular
  • Ill-defined
  • Spiculated solid mass
Fat necrosis[36] + ±
  • Hard or smooth mass
  • Solitary mass
  • Mobile
  • Collections of liquefied fat
Ultrasound:
  • Collections of liquefied fat
  • Oil cysts

References

  1. Pinto, Joana; Aguiar, Ana Teresa; Duarte, Hálio; Vilaverde, Filipa; Rodrigues, Ângelo; Krug, José Luís (2014). “Simple and Complex Fibroadenomas”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 33 (3): 415–419. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.3.415. ISSN 0278-4297.
  2. Courtillot C, Plu-Bureau G, Binart N, Balleyguier C, Sigal-Zafrani B, Goffin V; et al. (2005). “Benign breast diseases”. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 10 (4): 325–35. doi:10.1007/s10911-006-9006-4. PMID 16900392.
  3. Templeman C, Hertweck SP (2000). “Breast disorders in the pediatric and adolescent patient”. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 27 (1): 19–34. PMID 10693180.
  4. Yu JH, Kim MJ, Cho H, Liu HJ, Han SJ, Ahn TG (2013). “Breast diseases during pregnancy and lactation”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 56 (3): 143–59. doi:10.5468/ogs.2013.56.3.143. PMC 3784111. PMID 24327995.
  5. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de las Heras P; et al. (2007). “Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation”. Radiographics. 27 Suppl 1: S101–24. doi:10.1148/rg.27si075505. PMID 18180221.
  6. De Silva NK, Brandt ML (2006). “Disorders of the breast in children and adolescents, Part 2: breast masses”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 19 (6): 415–8. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.09.002. PMID 17174833.
  7. Tse GM, Law BK, Ma TK, Chan AB, Pang LM, Chu WC; et al. (2002). “Hamartoma of the breast: a clinicopathological review”. J Clin Pathol. 55 (12): 951–4. PMC 1769817. PMID 12461066.
  8. D’Alfonso TM, Ginter PS, Shin SJ (2015). “A Review of Inflammatory Processes of the Breast with a Focus on Diagnosis in Core Biopsy Samples”. J Pathol Transl Med. 49 (4): 279–87. doi:10.4132/jptm.2015.06.11. PMC 4508565. PMID 26095437.
  9. Dixon JM (2007). “Breast abscess”. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 68 (6): 315–20. doi:10.12968/hmed.2007.68.6.23574. PMID 17639835.
  10. Dixon JM, Ravisekar O, Chetty U, Anderson TJ (1996). “Periductal mastitis and duct ectasia: different conditions with different aetiologies”. Br J Surg. 83 (6): 820–2. PMID 8696751.
  11. Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007). “ACOG Committee Opinion No. 361: Breastfeeding: maternal and infant aspects”. Obstet Gynecol. 109 (2 Pt 1): 479–80. PMID 17267864.
  12. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (January 2018). “Cancer statistics, 2018”. CA Cancer J Clin. 68 (1): 7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442. PMID 29313949.
  13. Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR (October 2005). “Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer”. Br. J. Cancer. 93 (9): 1046–52. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602787. PMC 2361680. PMID 16175185.
  14. Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, Caggiano V (2009). “Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004”. Breast J. 15 (6): 593–602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00822.x. PMID 19764994.
  15. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (February 2010). “Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102 (3): 170–8. doi:10.1093/jnci/djp482. PMID 20071685.
  16. Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD, Anderson WF (November 2008). “Recent trends in breast cancer among younger women in the United States”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100 (22): 1643–8. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn344. PMC 2720764. PMID 19001605.
  17. Sue GR, Lannin DR, Killelea B, Chagpar AB (October 2013). “Predictors of microinvasion and its prognostic role in ductal carcinoma in situ”. Am. J. Surg. 206 (4): 478–81. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.039. PMID 23791403.
  18. Smith TB, Gilcrease MZ, Santiago L, Hunt KK, Yang WT (April 2012). “Imaging features of primary breast sarcoma”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198 (4): W386–93. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7341. PMID 22451578.
  19. Geisler DP, Boyle MJ, Malnar KF, McGee JM, Nolen MC, Fortner SM, Broughan TA (April 2000). “Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a review of 32 cases”. Am Surg. 66 (4): 360–6. PMID 10776873.
  20. Chaney AW, Pollack A, McNeese MD, Zagars GK, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Hunt KK (October 2000). “Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast”. Cancer. 89 (7): 1502–11. PMID 11013364.
  21. Brogi E, Harris NL (June 1999). “Lymphomas of the breast: pathology and clinical behavior”. Semin. Oncol. 26 (3): 357–64. PMID 10375092.
  22. Barişta I, Baltali E, Tekuzman G, Kars A, Ruacan S, Ozişik Y, Güler N, Güllü IH, Atahan IL, Firat D (2000). “Primary breast lymphomas–a retrospective analysis of twelve cases”. Acta Oncol. 39 (2): 135–9. PMID 10859001.
  23. Schwartz GF (June 1982). “Benign neoplasms and “inflammations” of the breast”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 25 (2): 373–85. PMID 6286199.
  24. Wen X, Cheng W (January 2013). “Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors”. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 20 (1): 94–101. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2590-1. PMID 22878621.
  25. Guray M, Sahin AA (May 2006). “Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management”. Oncologist. 11 (5): 435–49. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-435. PMID 16720843.
  26. Jensen RA, Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW (1989). “Invasive breast cancer risk in women with sclerosing adenosis”. Cancer. 64 (10): 1977–83. PMID 2804888.
  27. Wang J, Costantino JP, Tan-Chiu E, Wickerham DL, Paik S, Wolmark N (2004). “Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 96 (8): 616–20. PMID 15100339.
  28. Celliers L, Wong DD, Bourke A (2010). “Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: a study of the mammographic and sonographic features”. Clin Radiol. 65 (2): 145–9. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.10.003. PMID 20103437.
  29. Salvador R, Lirola JL, Domínguez R, López M, Risueño N (2004). “Pseudo-angiomatous stromal hyperplasia presenting as a breast mass: imaging findings in three patients”. Breast. 13 (5): 431–5. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.011. PMID 15454202.
  30. Becker L, McCurdy LI, Taves DH (2001). “Superficial thrombophlebitis of the breast (Mondor’s disease)”. Can Assoc Radiol J. 52 (3): 193–5. PMID 11436415.
  31. Catania S, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Galimberti V, Bono A, Pluchinotta A (1992). “Mondor’s disease and breast cancer”. Cancer. 69 (9): 2267–70. PMID 1562972.
  32. Kudva YC, Reynolds C, O’Brien T, Powell C, Oberg AL, Crotty TB (2002). Diabetic mastopathy,” or sclerosing lymphocytic lobulitis, is strongly associated with type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes Care. 25 (1): 121–6. PMID 11772912.
  33. Draghi F, Tarantino CC, Madonia L, Ferrozzi G (2011). “Ultrasonography of the male breast”. J Ultrasound. 14 (3): 122–9. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2011.06.004. PMC 3558246. PMID 23397020.
  34. Braunstein GD (2007). “Clinical practice. Gynecomastia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (12): 1229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp070677. PMID 17881754.
  35. Lower EE, Hawkins HH, Baughman RP (2001). “Breast disease in sarcoidosis”. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 18 (3): 301–6. PMID 11587103.
  36. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS (1998). “Fat necrosis in the breast: sonographic features”. Radiology. 206 (1): 261–9. doi:10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423681. PMID 9423681.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

The incidence rate of breast lumps is not particularly clear due to the fact that breast lumps is not considered as a life threatening condition and majority of the women who receives medical therapies or surgeries come into account.The prevalence of benign breast disease is approximately 68% among all breast diseases and the incidence of breast diseases is higher on the left upper/outer quadrant of breast. Fibrocystic diseases are more frequent in age of 40-44 years and fibroadenoma is more frequent between 15-35 years. Fibroadenoma rate is higher in black women. African-American women have worse prognosis and higher mortality rate in comparison European American women.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence rate of benign breast disease is unclear due to the fact that breast lumps is not considered as a life threatening condition.[1]
  • Majority of the women who receives medical therapies or surgeries come into account.
  • Particular detection rate is unknown and not estimated.

Prevalence

  • The prevalence of benign breast disease is approximately 68% among all breast diseases.[2]
  • Approximately 60% of benign breast diseases occur in left breast and 40% in the right breast.
  • 100% of definite palpable lumps are characteristics of fibroadenoma, phyllodes tumor, and adenomyoepithelioma.
  • 64% of lumps located in upper outer quadrant, 26% of lumps in lower outer quadrant, 10% of lumps in upper inner quadrant.

Age

Age-specific incidence rate of benign breast diseases.[1]

  • The incidence rate of fibrocystic disease is 137 per 100,000 in women aged 25-29 years, 411 per 100,000 in age of 40-44 years and 387 per 100,000 in 45-49 years.
  • The incidence rate of fibroadenoma is 115 per 100,000 in women aged 20-24 years.
  • The peak incidence rate of fibroadenoma is between 15-35 years.[3]
  • Fibrocystic disease, phyllodes tumor, and adenomyoepithelioma are usually seen in 3rd and 4th decade of life.[2]

Race


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Goehring C, Morabia A (1997). “Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with special attention to histologic types”. Epidemiol Rev. 19 (2): 310–27. PMID 9494790.
  2. 2.0 2.1 M, Dr. Vijayalakshmi; Rao, Dr. J Yadigiri; Shekar, Dr. T.Y.; Balakrishnan, Dr. Shobha; M, Dr. Divya; K, Dr. Sameera; N, Dr. Alekya; JVNK, Dr. Aravind (2016). “Prevalence of Benign Breast Disease and Risk of Malignancy in Benign Breast Diseases”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 15 (08): 32–36. doi:10.9790/0853-1508083236. ISSN 2279-0861.
  3. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJ (1987). “Aberrations of normal development and involution (ANDI): a new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature of benign breast disorders”. Lancet. 2 (8571): 1316–9. PMID 2890912.
  4. Gupta V, Haque I, Chakraborty J, Graff S, Banerjee S, Banerjee SK (2018). “Racial disparity in breast cancer: can it be mattered for prognosis and therapy”. J Cell Commun Signal. 12 (1): 119–132. doi:10.1007/s12079-017-0416-4. PMC 5842180. PMID 29188479.
  5. Oluwole SF, Freeman HP (1979). “Analysis of benign breast lesions in blacks”. Am J Surg. 137 (6): 786–9. PMID 453472.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Risk factors of breast lumps are generally age (higher cancer risk while aging), past history of breast disease or biopsy, positive familial history in first-degree relatives, genetic mutations such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, endogenous hormonal exposure such as age at menarch, first pregnancy, menopause, breast feeding, and parity, exogenous hormonal exposure such as usage of contraceptive pills and hormonal replacement therapy, and lifestyle factors such as alcohol consumption, inactivity, obesity, and previous history of radiation exposure.

Risk Factors

Risk factors leading to female breast cancer:[1][2]

References

  1. Shah R, Rosso K, Nathanson SD (2014). “Pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer”. World J Clin Oncol. 5 (3): 283–98. doi:10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.283. PMC 4127601. PMID 25114845.
  2. Clemons M, Goss P (2001). “Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer”. N Engl J Med. 344 (4): 276–85. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101253440407. PMID 11172156.


Template:WikiDoc Sources


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

Screening for breast lumps is recommended by breast examination, ultrasound, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging.

Screening

The Screening methods of breast lesions:[1]

  • Breast examination
    • Self breast examination
      • Although this is controversial, most clinicians recommend women to perform self examination monthly.
    • Clinical breast examination
      • Women with age> 40 years is recommended to have clinical breast examination, annually.
  • Ultrasound
  • Mammography[3]
    • Gold standard test of screening
    • Early detection of non-palpabale masses
    • According to 2013 NCCN guidelines
      • Annual screening in average risk women aged ≥ 40 years
      • Annual screening in high risk women from age of 25 years
    • Sensitivity of 0.33-0.39 and specificity of 0.95
  • Magnetic resonance imaging[3][4]
    • Significant method for detection, assessment, and management of breast cancer
    • Sensitivity of 0.77-0.79 and specificity of 0.86-0.89
    • According on 2013 NCCN guidelines
      • Annual MRI for individuals with > 20% risk of developing breast cancer in lifetime starting at age of 25 years
    • Beneficial modality for screening in high risk individuals
    • Valuable screening method in individuals with equivocal results from other screening tests
    • Usable for individuals with ineffective mammography results due to breast augmentation

References

  1. Shah R, Rosso K, Nathanson SD (2014). “Pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer”. World J Clin Oncol. 5 (3): 283–98. doi:10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.283. PMC 4127601. PMID 25114845.
  2. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ (2010). “Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts”. Eur Radiol. 20 (3): 734–42. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y. PMC 2822222. PMID 19727744.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM; et al. (2004). “Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition”. N Engl J Med. 351 (5): 427–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa031759. PMID 15282350. Review in: ACP J Club. 2005 Jan-Feb;142(1):23
  4. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008). “Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer”. Ann Intern Med. 148 (9): 671–9. PMID 18458280.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shadan Mehraban, M.D.[2]

Overview

If benign breast lumps left untreated, those proved to be benign both by clinical examination and cytological diagnosis, do not become malignant and 68% of benign breast lumps resolve by time mostly after 2 years. Benign breast lumps should approved to be benign both clinically and cytologicaly. Because some of breast lumps which thought to be benign ones can turn to be malignant by cytological results. Breast lumps which approved to be benign both clinically and cytologicaly in women under 35 years can resolve over time if do not excised.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Complications

Prognosis

The relative risk (RR) of following breast cancer in different types of breast lumps:[5][6][7]

  • Non-proliferative breast lesions have RR 1.2-1.4.
  • Proliferative diseases (PD) have RR 1.7-2.1.
  • Proliferative diseases (PD) with atypia have RR more than 4 for breast cancer.
  • PD and PD with atypia may be considered as early stages of breast cancer.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sainsbury JR, Nicholson S, Needham GK, Wadehra V, Farndon JR (1988). “Natural history of the benign breast lump”. Br J Surg. 75 (11): 1080–2. PMID 3208039.
  2. Kern WH, Clark RW (1973). “Retrogression of fibroadenomas of the breast”. Am J Surg. 126 (1): 59–62. PMID 4123521.
  3. Pick PW, Iossifides IA (1984). “Occurrence of breast carcinoma within a fibroadenoma. A review”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 108 (7): 590–4. PMID 6329129.
  4. Haagensen, C. D. Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971. Print.
  5. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K; et al. (2005). “Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer”. N Engl J Med. 353 (3): 229–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa044383. PMID 16034008.
  6. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985). “Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study”. Cancer. 55 (11): 2698–708. PMID 2986821.
  7. Neal L, Sandhu NP, Hieken TJ, Glazebrook KN, Mac Bride MB, Dilaveri CA; et al. (2014). “Diagnosis and management of benign, atypical, and indeterminate breast lesions detected on core needle biopsy”. Mayo Clin Proc. 89 (4): 536–47. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.004. PMID 24684875.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH