Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Cervical cancer


For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Uterine cervix carcinoma.

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

Overview

Cervical cancer was once one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the US and worldwide before the introduction of Pap smear and screening. It currently accounts for a significant but declining portion of the US cancer burden, now ranking 14th in incidence. Cervical cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the cervix. It may present with vaginal bleeding although it may remain asymptomatic until the disease reaches advanced stages. Treatment consists of surgery in the early stages and chemotherapy and radiotherapy in advanced stages of the disease. An effective HPV vaccine against the two most common cancer-causing strains of HPV has recently been licensed in the US (2006). These two HPV strains together are responsible for approximately 70% of all cervical cancers. The high risk HPV E6 and E7 gene products, which are involved in viral replication and oncogenesis bind to p53 and prevent its normal activities which are G1 arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair. The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer every 3 years with cervical cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years and for women aged 30 to 65 years, every 3 years with cervical cytology alone, every 5 years with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone, or every 5 years with hrHPV testing in combination with cytology (cotesting). The most important risk factors associated with the infection by HPV are young age at coitarche (first sexual intercourse), having multiple sexual partners throughout life, or women being with men having multiple sexual partners. Male circumcision and use of condoms are factors that can reduce, but do not eliminate the transmission of human papilloma virus. Treatment of cervical neoplasia depends upon stage of cancer at the time of presentation. It consists of surgical procedure like hysterectomy, and/or radiation and chemotherapy.

Historical Perspective

In 400 BC, Hippocrates referred to cervical cancer as cancer of the uterus, little was known about cervical cancer until the Renaissance era. In 1842, an Italian physician named Mario Rigoni Stern noticed that cancer of the cervix prevalence was high among married and widowed women and low or rare among the unmarried women and absent in Italian nuns.

Classification

Cervical cancer may be classified into many subtypes based on FIGO classification. In stage I, carcinoma is strictly confined to the cervix, in stage II, the carcinoma invades beyond the uterus, but has not extended onto the lower third of the vagina or to the pelvic wall.

Pathophysiology

Persistent infection with high-risk HPV genotypes is the primary driver of cervical oncogenesis and is widely related to disrupting cell cycle growth and regulations. A summary of these mechanisms include: The high risk HPV E6 and E7 gene products which are involved in viral replication and oncogenesis bind to p53 and prevent its normal activities which are G1 arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair. HPV enters the host cells which are squamous cells of epithelium in cervix, mainly in junctional zone, between the columnar epithelium of the endocervix and the squamous epithelium of the ectocervix and that is how viral transcription and replication begins. HPV infection of the basal layer of epithelium takes place by attachment via a different mechanism of entry, this happens by cell surface heparan sulfate, stabilizing proteoglycans and Integrin.

Differential diagnosis

Cervical cancer must be differentiated from other diseases that cause abnormal vaginal bleeding, such as cervical polyp, cervical leiomyoma, invasion of the cervix from primary uterine malignancy, vaginal cancer, cervical lymphoma, metastases to cervix, and cervical ectopic pregnancy.

Epidemiology and Demographics

In terms of frequency, cervical cancer currently accounts for a significant but declining portion of the US cancer burden, now ranking 14th in incidence (while still being very common in the least developed countries). In The United States, cervical cancer is more common among Hispanics, African-Americans, Asians and Pacific Islanders, and followed by whites. Alaska Natives and American Indians have the lowest rate of incidence. The median age at diagnosis is approximately 50 years, with the disease predominantly affecting women in mid-adulthood. As of the last major statistical update in 2015, the annual incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. were 7.4 and 2.3 per 100,000 women, respectively.

Risk Factors

The most potent risk factor in the development of cervical cancer is Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Other risk factors include smoking, increased number of sexual partners, and young age at time of first sexual intercourse, high parity, use of oral contraceptives, immunodeficiency.

Screening

According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology, screening for cervical cancer by pap smear is recommended every 3 years among women age 21 to 29 years and for women aged 30 to 65 years, every 3 years with cervical cytology alone, every 5 years with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone, or every 5 years with hrHPV testing in combination with cytology (cotesting).

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Infection by high risk strain of oncogenic HPV types is an established cause of neoplastic lesions of the cervix, vagina and vulva, anus, penis and oropharynx. HPV 16 and 18 are the most common cause of approximately 70% of all cervical cancers worldwide. HPV is highly transmissible through direct skin to skin contact and intercourse, women with persistent high-risk HPV infections are at greatest risk for developing cervical cancer. Common complications of cervical cancer include vaginal bleeding, fistula and renal failure. Prognosis is generally good, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with cervical cancer is approximately 67.9%.

Diagnosis

Staging

Cervical cancer is staged by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, which is based on clinical examination, imaging studies and procedures such as hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, proctoscopy, intravenous urography, and cervical conization.

History and Symptoms

Physical examination of patients with advanced cervical cancer is typically notable for a palpable cervical lesion, pallor and pedal edema. Most women with cervical cancer are asymptomatic at the early stage of disease, those patients in advanced stages of cancer may have symptoms like abnormal vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, abdominal and pelvic pain, urinary hesitancy.

Chest Xray

Chest radiography (CXR) is the initial imaging modality used in the detection of suspected pulmonary metastasis. It has limited value in initial workup for cervical cancer, unless there is a metastasis to the lungs which typically happens in advanced stage of cancer.

CT

Computerised tomography (CT) is used for clinical staging of cervical carcinoma, it improves the accuracy of staging based on FIGO guidelines. CT scan is useful in evaluating the followings:Tumor size, parametrial invasion, Lymph node and distant metastasis, Ureteral involvement and the functional status of kidneys.

MRI

Pelvic MRI is helpful in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. In patients with advanced disease, there are several findings on MRI studies which may help early prediction of the therapeutic outcome, tumor size reduction, myometrial invasion, lymph node invasion more accurately.

Ultrasound

Transvaginal color doppler ultrasound can be used in predicting response to chemotherapy in women with cervical cancer. Doppler ultrasound can predict tumor volume based on angiogenesis, intramural vascularization and hemodynamic flow. Transvaginal ultrasound also is helpful in detecting small size tumor and invasion to lymph nodes.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Cervical biopsy is the confirmatory test for the diagnosis of cervical cancer or pre-cancer. Most women have tissue removed in the doctor’s office with local anesthesia. A pathologist checks the tissue under a microscope for abnormal cells. In Punch biopsy, a specialized forceps is utilized to obtain small samples of cervical tissue. In Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), an electric wire loop is used to slice off a thin, round piece of cervical tissue. This method allows deep excision of the transformation zone. In endocervical curettage, a curette (a small, spoon-shaped instrument) is used to scrape a small sample of tissue from the cervix. Some doctors may use a thin, soft brush instead of a curette. A conization, or cold knife cone biopsy, cone-shaped samples are removed from cervix and allows for accurate examination of biopsy specimens by pathologists. This can be done in doctor’s office or in the hospital under general anesthesia. Most significant complication of this method is hemorrhage. There is a relative contraindication for pregnant women and also conization increase the risk of preterm birth.

Treatment

Medical therapy

The optimal therapy for cervical cancer depends on the stage at diagnosis, treatment of cervical neoplasia is mainly a combination of radiation therapy and use of chemotherapeutic agents.

Surgery

The feasibility of surgery depends on the stage of cervical cancer at diagnosis, the mainstay of surgical management for cervical carcinoma is radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Surgery can be done by cold knife conization, loop electrosurgical excision procedure, total hysterectomy.

Cervical cancer during pregnancy

During pregnancy, no therapy is warranted for preinvasive lesions of the cervix, including carcinoma in situ, although expert colposcopy is recommended to exclude invasive cancer. Patients with early stage (IA) disease may safely undergo fertility-sparing treatments. For patients with advanced disease, waiting for viability is generally not acceptable.The standard of care for locally advanced disease consists of definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Primary Prevention

Prevention of cervical cancer includes a comprehensive approach involving awareness, screening, and preventative vaccinations.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

Overview

In 400 BC, Hippocrates referred to cervical cancer as cancer of the uterus, it was little known about cervical cancer until the Rennaissance era. In 1842, an Italian physician named Rigoni-stern noticed that cancer of the cervix prevalence was high among married and widowed women and low or rare among the unmarried women and absent in Italian nuns.

Historical Perspective

  • In 400 BC, Hippocrates referred to cervical cancer as cancer of the uterus which should be left untreated since there is no cure for it.[1][2]
  • In 1842, an Italian physician named Rigoni-stern noticed that cancer of the cervix prevalence was high among married and widowed women and low or rare among the unmarried women and absent in Italian nuns.[3]
  • In 1941, The Papanicolaou smear, a routine screening test for cervical cancer, proved by George Nicholaus Papanicolaou.[4][5]
  • In 1970s, Harold zur Hausen, a German physician, first discovered that infection with papillomavirus is cause of cervical cancer, his research included HPV types 16 and 18 as main cause of increased risk for cervical neoplasia.[6][7]
  • In 2006, first HPV vaccine was approved by FDA . [8]

References

  1. Nor Hayati O (January 2003). “Cancer of the cervix – from bleak past to bright future; a review, with an emphasis on cancer of the cervix in malaysia”. Malays J Med Sci. 10 (1): 13–26. PMID 23365496.
  2. Di Lonardo, Anna; Nasi, Sergio; Pulciani, Simonetta (2015). “Cancer: We Should Not Forget The Past”. Journal of Cancer. 6 (1): 29–39. doi:10.7150/jca.10336. ISSN 1837-9664.
  3. Nor Hayati O (January 2003). “Cancer of the cervix – from bleak past to bright future; a review, with an emphasis on cancer of the cervix in malaysia”. Malays J Med Sci. 10 (1): 13–26. PMID 23365496.
  4. Vilos GA (March 1998). “The history of the Papanicolaou smear and the odyssey of George and Andromache Papanicolaou”. Obstet Gynecol. 91 (3): 479–83. PMID 9491881.
  5. Michalas, Stylianos P. (2000). “The Pap test: George N. Papanicolaou (1883–1962)”. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 90 (2): 135–138. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00260-8. ISSN 0301-2115.
  6. . doi:10.1097/PAP.0b013e3182862aab. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. Nour NM (2009). “Cervical cancer: a preventable death”. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2 (4): 240–4. PMID 20111660.
  8. Kelly, Bridget J.; Leader, Amy E.; Mittermaier, Danielle J.; Hornik, Robert C.; Cappella, Joseph N. (2009). “The HPV vaccine and the media: How has the topic been covered and what are the effects on knowledge about the virus and cervical cancer?”. Patient Education and Counseling. 77 (2): 308–313. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.018. ISSN 0738-3991.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

Overview

Cervical cancer may be classified into many subtypes based on FIGO classification.

Classification

Newly revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer, included pathological and imaging findings as well as clinical manifestations.[1][2][3]


FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri (2018)

Stage Description
I The carcinoma is strictly confined to the cervix (extension to the uterine corpus should be disregarded)
IA Invasive carcinoma that can be diagnosed only by microscopy, with maximum depth of invasion <5 mma
IA1 Measured stromal invasion <3 mm in depth
IA2 Measured stromal invasion ≥3 mm and <5 mm in depth
IB Invasive carcinoma with measured deepest invasion ≥5 mm (greater than Stage IA), lesion limited to the cervix uteri
IB1 Invasive carcinoma ≥5 mm depth of stromal invasion, and <2 cm in greatest dimension
IB2 Invasive carcinoma ≥2 cm and <4 cm in greatest dimension
IB3 Invasive carcinoma ≥4 cm in greatest dimension
II The carcinoma invades beyond the uterus, but has not extended onto the lower third of the vagina or to the pelvic wall
IIA Involvement limited to the upper two‐thirds of the vagina without parametrial involvement
IIA1 Invasive carcinoma <4 cm in greatest dimension
IIA2 Invasive carcinoma ≥4 cm in greatest dimension
IIB With parametrial involvement but not up to the pelvic wall
III The carcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina and/or extends to the pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney and/or involves pelvic and/or para‐aortic lymph nodes
IIIA The carcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina, with no extension to the pelvic wall
IIIB Extension to the pelvic wall and/or hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney (unless known to be due to another cause)
IIIC Involvement of pelvic and/or para‐aortic lymph nodes, irrespective of tumor size and extent (with r and p notations)c
IIIC1 Pelvic lymph node metastasis only
IIIC2 Para‐aortic lymph node metastasis
IV The carcinoma has extended beyond the true pelvis or has involved (biopsy proven) the mucosa of the bladder or rectum. (A bullous edema, as such, does not permit a case to be allotted to Stage IV)
IVA Spread to adjacent pelvic organs
IVB Spread to distant organs

References

  1. Matsuo, Koji; Machida, Hiroko; Mandelbaum, Rachel S.; Konishi, Ikuo; Mikami, Mikio (2019). “Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system”. Gynecologic Oncology. 152 (1): 87–93. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.026. ISSN 0090-8258.
  2. Bhatla, Neerja; Aoki, Daisuke; Sharma, Daya Nand; Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy (2018). “Cancer of the cervix uteri”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 143: 22–36. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12611. ISSN 0020-7292.
  3. Chamié, Luciana Pardini; Blasbalg, Roberto; Pereira, Ricardo Mendes Alves; Warmbrand, Gisele; Serafini, Paulo Cesar (2011). “Findings of Pelvic Endometriosis at Transvaginal US, MR Imaging, and Laparoscopy”. RadioGraphics. 31 (4): E77–E100. doi:10.1148/rg.314105193. ISSN 0271-5333.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2], Aida Javanbakht, M.D.

Overview

It is established that human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of development of cervical neoplasia, only high risk strain of HPV can cause cervical cancer among women who are affected. This is because of HPV produced proteins E7 which alters epithelium of cervix mainly at junctional zone between the columnar epithelium of the endocervix and the squamous epithelium of the ectocervix.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

High risk strains of HPV, mainly HPV types 16 and 18 had been identified as a potent cause of cancer of cervix. HPV plays main role in pathogenesis of cervical cancer and it is widely related to disrupting cell cycle growth and regulations, summary of these include:[1]

There are other cofactors that cause progression of cervical neoplasia, some of these include:[2][3][4]

Genetic

Associated Conditions:

Conditions associated with cervical cancer include:[7]

Gross Pathology:

Gross pathological changes can be visualized by colposcopy and biopsy and application of a 3% acetic acid solution on biopsy speciemen and inspection under bright filtered light microscopy with 10 to 15 fold magnification. Findings in gross pathology of patients with cervical cancer include:[8]


squamous cell carcinoma of the cervixsource:Ed Uthman, MD https://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/119271511/in/set-72057594114099781/


Microscopic pathology

Microscopic morphology of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN 1) include:[9]

CIN1 morphology source:Ed Uthman, Author,LSIL (CIN 1), Cervical Biopsy



High‐grade dysplasia (CIN 2 and 3) is characterized by the following features:

  • Loss of maturation
  • Nuclear crowding
  • Loss of nuclear polarity
  • Prominent cytonuclear atypia, increase in nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratios
  • Irregular nuclear contours and coarse chromatin.
  • Increased proliferation and mitotic changes in the upper part of the epithelium.
  • In CIN2, most cytonuclear abnormalities are seen in the lower and middle third of the epithelium.
  • CIN3 characteristic features include:
    • Full‐thickness cytonuclear atypia
    • Minimal to absent maturation
    • Numerous mitotic activities


showing CIN2machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims).


CIN3 machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims).



Video

{{#ev:youtube|J3kULzKGzws}}

References

  1. Burd EM (January 2003). “Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16 (1): 1–17. PMC 145302. PMID 12525422.
  2. Arends MJ, Buckley CH, Wells M (February 1998). “Aetiology, pathogenesis, and pathology of cervical neoplasia”. J. Clin. Pathol. 51 (2): 96–103. PMID 9602680.
  3. zur Hausen H (December 1982). “Human genital cancer: synergism between two virus infections or synergism between a virus infection and initiating events?”. Lancet. 2 (8312): 1370–2. PMID 6129466.
  4. Vanakankovit N, Taneepanichskul S (January 2008). “Effect of oral contraceptives on risk of cervical cancer”. J Med Assoc Thai. 91 (1): 7–12. PMID 18386537.
  5. . doi:10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60020-1. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. Shi, Ting-Yan; Chen, Xiao-Jun; Zhu, Mei-Ling; Wang, Meng-Yun; He, Jing; Yu, Ke-Da; Shao, Zhi-Ming; Sun, Meng-Hong; Zhou, Xiao-Yan; Cheng, Xi; Wu, Xiaohua; Wei, Qingyi (2013). “A pri-miR-218variant and risk of cervical carcinoma in Chinese women”. BMC Cancer. 13 (1). doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-19. ISSN 1471-2407.
  7. Ogino, Ichiro; Okamoto, Naoyuki; Ono, Yoshimi; Kitamura, Tatsuo; Nakayama, Hiroki (2003). “Pelvic insufficiency fractures in postmenopausal woman with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiotherapy”. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 68 (1): 61–67. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00128-2. ISSN 0167-8140.
  8. Burd, E. M. (2003). “Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 16 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1128/CMR.16.1.1-17.2003. ISSN 0893-8512.
  9. Kalof, A. N; Cooper, K. (2006). “Our approach to squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix”. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 60 (5): 449–455. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.036426. ISSN 0021-9746.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2], Monalisa Dmello, M.B,B.S., M.D. [3], Daniel Adamec[4]

Overview

Cervical cancer is primarily caused by persistent infection with oncogenic (high risk) Human papillomavirus (HPV). While a necessary etiological factor, the majority of infections are transient and resolve without progressing to malignancy. HPV is transmitted through mucosal and cutaneous contact, most commonly via sexual activity.[1] In 2024, approximately 13,820 new cases and 4,360 related deaths were expected in the United States.[2] Key risk factors for acquiring HPV include early age at first intercourse and a high number of lifetime sexual partners.[3]

Causes

  • Human papillomavirus is the main cause of cervical cancer. High-risk HPV types infect the basal layer of the cervical epithelium, particularly at the transformation zone, leading to malignant transformation.[4]
  • HPV is a small, non-enveloped, double-stranded circular DNA virus of approximately 8 kb, encoding eight genes, with a virion diameter of approximately 45-55 nm.[5] It is transmitted primarily through skin-to-skin contact, in particular via sexual activity.[6]
  • Oncogenic high-risk strains include types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68.[7]
  • The viral oncogenes E6 and E7 interfere with cell cycle control by inactivating the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb, respectively. E6 promotes p53 degradation by recruiting the cellular E3 ubiquitin ligase E6-AP (UBE3A; facilitating ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation), whereas E7 inactivates pRb primarily through direct binding (disrupting E2F, enabling constitutive cell cycle entry).[8] This disruption leads to genomic instability and the abnormal proliferation of squamous and glandular cells. [6]
  • Previously the association between HPV infection and glandular type of cervical neoplasia was considered not as strong as that of squamous carcinoma of the cervix. However, current evidence establishes high-risk HPV (particularly HPV 18) as the causative agent in the majority of endocervical adenocarcinomas.[9]

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2007). Human papillomaviruses (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 90). Lyon: IARC.
  2. Siegel, R. L., Giaquinto, A. N., & Jemal, A. (2024). Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(1), 12–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820
  3. Kjaer, S. K., Chackerian, B., van den Brule, A. J. C., Svare, E. I., Paull, G., Walbomers, J. M. M., … Meijer, C. J. L. M. (2001). High-risk human papillomavirus is sexually transmitted: Evidence from a follow-up study of virgins starting sexual activity (intercourse). Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 10(2), 101–106.
  4. Doorbar, J. (2006). Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clinical Science, 110(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20050369
  5. Bernard, H.‑U., Burk, R. D., Chen, Z., van Doorslaer, K., Zur Hausen, H., & de Villiers, E.‑M. (2010). Classification of papillomaviruses (PVs) based on 189 PV types and proposal of taxonomic amendments. Virology, 401(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2010.02.002
  6. 6.0 6.1 Burd EM (January 2003). “Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16 (1): 1–17. PMID 12525422.
  7. Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., de Sanjosé, S., Herrero, R., Castellsagué, X., Shah, K. V., … Meijer, C. J. L. M. (2003). Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(6), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021641
  8. Huibregtse, J. M., Scheffner, M., & Howley, P. M. (1993). Cloning and expression of the cDNA for E6-AP, a protein that mediates the interaction of the human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein with p53. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13(2), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.13.2.775
  9. Andersson, S., Rylander, E., Larsson, B., Strand, A., Silfverswärd, C., & Wilander, E. (2001). The role of human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. European Journal of Cancer, 37(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00376-6

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Cervical Cancer from other Disorders

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

Overview

Cervical cancer must be differentiated from other diseases that cause abnormal vaginal bleeding, such as cervical polyp, cervical leiomyoma, invasion of the cervix from primary uterine malignancy, vaginal cancer, cervical lymphoma, metastases to cervix, and cervical ectopic pregnancy.

Cervical cancer differential diagnosis

  • Cervical cancer must be differentiated from a mass involving the cervix, and causing abnormal vaginal bleeding:[1][2][3]
Abnormal Uterine bleeding differential diagnosis
Ob-Gyn neoplasm and diseases Clinical manifestations Para-clinical findings Gold standard
Symptoms Physical exam Lab Findings Imaging Histopathology
Abnormal vaginal bleeding Other Genitourinary/ Gastrointestinal symptoms Abdominal pain Pelvic

pain

B symptoms Gynecological examinations Abdominal

mass

HPV

Pap smear

STI panel

Other labs Ultrasound Other forms of

imaging

Cervical cancer[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
  • Postmenopausal
  • Intermenstrual
  • Postcoital
  • Bleeding after pelvic exam

+

+ +
  • Cervical mass on exam
+ ± HPV T2-weighted MRI :
  • Ovoid, heterogeneous tumor distending the cervical canal with stromal involvement. PET/CT scan:
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:
  • CIN3: High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL); full-thickness epithelial dysplasia
Cervical polyp[12]
  • Mass on exam
  • Hyper/hypoechogenic masses with or without cysts
  • Filling the endocervical or vaginal canal
Cervical leiomyoma[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]
  • Heavy/prolonged menstrual bleeding
  • Intermenstrual bleeding
+ + ±
    • Well circumscribed hyperechoic mass
    T2-weighted MRI:
    • Hypointense masses
    • Homogeneous

    enhancement

    • Red degeneration
    • Clinical diagnosis
    Cervical lymphoma[22][23][24]
    • Difficulty urinating
    • Post-coital pain
    + + +
    • Irregularity
    + Pap smear: Immunohistochemistry markers:
    • Well-defined, solid, concentric, hypoechoic mass
    MRI:
    • Intramyometrial infiltrative nodules
    • Small tumor cells with large nuclei
    • High mitoses and proliferation
    Cervical sarcoma[25][26][27][28] + + ±
    • Cervical mass
    • protruding mass from vagina/vulva
    + Leiomyosarcoma markers:
    • characteristically positive for Desmin, Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA), and h-Caldesmon; S-100 is typically negative (useful for ruling out neural tumors)
    MRI:
    • Endometrial polypoid mass
    • Hypointense hypervascular solid components
    Cervical erosion(Ectropion)[29][30][31][32][33]
    • Post-coital pain
    • Painful cramps
    + +
    • Red, glandular area around os of cervix
    N/A N/A N/A
    Cervicitis[34][35][36][37][38]
    • Intermenstrual bleeding
    • Postcoital
    • Pain during urination
    + +
    • May have fever only
    STI panel:
      MRI:

      May be detected as retention cysts in cervix.

      • Non-specific, lymphocytic infiltration may be seen in microscopic histology.
      • Koilocytic changes in case of HPV as cause of chronic cervicitis.
      Endometriosis[39][40][41][42][43][44][45]
      • Heavy menstrual bleeding
      • Painful menstruation
      • Burning/painful urination
      • Painful bowel movement
      • Pain during or after sex
      • Infertility
      • Watery vaginal discharge
      + +

      (limited value)

      • Ground glass echogenicity of the cyst fluid (Endometrioma)
      • Cysts are unilocular
        Pelvic inflammatory diseases[46][47][48][49]
        • Bleeding after sex
        • Intermenstrual bleeding
        +
        • Febrile (Temp. >38.3°C / 101°F)
        • Vaginal/vulvar tender lesion depending on microbial causes
        STI panel:
        • WBC
        • Febrile (Temp. >38.3°C / 101°F)
        Ultrasound:
        • Thickened, fluid-filled tubes with or without free pelvic or tubo-ovarian complex
        MRI findings:
        • Inflammation in pelvic soft tissue
          • Clinical diagnosis is gold standard for diagnosing PID
          Adenomyosis[50][51][52][53][54][55]
          • Abnormal uterine bleeding
          • Painful menstruation
          + +
          • Subendometrial striations
          • Myometrial cysts
          • Asymmetrical thickness in myometrium walls
          • Heterogenous echotexture of myometrium
          MRI:
          • Thickened junctional zone
          • Presence of ectopic endometrial glands into the myometrium.
          Cervical ectopic pregnancy[56][57] +
          • Soft and disporportionally enlarged uterus.
          ± T2-weighted MRI:
          • Hypointense large mass

          T1-weighted MRI:

          • Partially hyperintense mass
          Vaginal cancer[58][59][60][61]
          • Postcoital bleeding
          + + ±
          • Ill-defined vaginal ulcer
          • In case of metastases to internal organs
          Ultrasound: MRI:
          • Isointense on T1-weighted images
          • Soft-tissue mass with intermediate-to-high signal intensity on T2-weighted images
          Biopsy findings:
          Paget’s disease of vulva to cervix[62][63][64][65][66]
          • Bleeding from lesion
          • Pain in vulva
          • Vulvar pruritus or irritation
            • Negative for S-100 and Melan-A
            N/A MRI:
            • Hyperintense on diffusion weighted imaging
            • Thick vulvar skin
            • “Cake-icing effect”, pathognomic for vulvar Paget’s disease
            Nabothian cyst[67][68][69][70]
            • Postcoital bleeding
            • In very rare cases depending upon the size of cyst it can cause abdominal pain
            • Majority of them are asymptomatic due to their small size ( few milimeters)
            N/A
            • Anechoic well defined cystic lesions
            T1-weighted
            • Intermediate or slightly high signal intensity T2-weighted
            • High signal intensity on T2-weighted images
            • Benign cystic lesion
            • Multiple benign cystic masses, usually few millimeters in diameter.
            IUD use[71][72][73]
            • Heavy bleeding
            + +
            • Normal
            • May have decreased RBC count
            • Linear echogenic intrauterine structures
            N/A N/A

            References

            1. Mwaka, Amos D.; Orach, Christopher G.; Were, Edward M.; Lyratzopoulos, Georgios; Wabinga, Henry; Roland, Martin (2016). “Awareness of cervical cancer risk factors and symptoms: cross-sectional community survey in post-conflict northern Uganda”. Health Expectations. 19 (4): 854–867. doi:10.1111/hex.12382. ISSN 1369-6513.
            2. Donovan, Kristine A.; Boyington, Alice R.; Judson, Patricia L.; Wyman, Jean F. (2014). “Bladder and bowel symptoms in cervical and endometrial cancer survivors”. Psycho-Oncology. 23 (6): 672–678. doi:10.1002/pon.3461. ISSN 1057-9249.
            3. Kim, Soo Hyun; Kang, Sokbom; Kim, Yong-Man; Kim, Byoung-Gie; Seong, Seok Ju; Cha, Soon Do; Park, Chan-Yong; Yun, Young Ho (2010). “Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety and Depression Among Cervical Cancer Survivors in Korea”. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 20 (6): 1017–1024. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e4a704. ISSN 1048-891X.
            4. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (January 2013). “Symptoms and risk factors to identify women with suspected cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm”. Br J Gen Pract. 63 (606): e11–21. doi:10.3399/bjgp13X660733. PMC 3529288. PMID 23336450.
            5. Dunyo, Priscilla; Effah, Kofi; Udofia, Emilia Asuquo (2018). “Factors associated with late presentation of cervical cancer cases at a district hospital: a retrospective study”. BMC Public Health. 18 (1). doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6065-6. ISSN 1471-2458.
            6. Khalife D, El Housheimi A, Khalil A, Saba C S, Seoud M, Rammal R, Abdallah IE, Abdallah R (February 2019). “Treatment of cervical cancer metastatic to the abdominal wall with reconstruction using a composite myocutaneous flap: A case report”. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 27: 38–41. doi:10.1016/j.gore.2018.12.006. PMC 6302027. PMID 30603660. Vancouver style error: name (help)
            7. . doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000498. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
            8. Brenner PF (September 1996). “Differential diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 175 (3 Pt 2): 766–9. PMID 8828559.
            9. Alcázar, Juan Luis; Arribas, Sara; Mínguez, José Angel; Jurado, Matías (2014). “The Role of Ultrasound in the Assessment of Uterine Cervical Cancer”. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 64 (5): 311–316. doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0622-4. ISSN 0971-9202.
            10. Qing L, Xiang T, Guofu Z, Weiwei F (September 2014). “Leukemoid reaction in cervical cancer: a case report and review of the literature”. BMC Cancer. 14: 670. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-670. PMC 4174654. PMID 25223869.
            11. Qing L, Xiang T, Guofu Z, Weiwei F (September 2014). “Leukemoid reaction in cervical cancer: a case report and review of the literature”. BMC Cancer. 14: 670. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-670. PMC 4174654. PMID 25223869.
            12. Mitchell H (May 2004). “Vaginal discharge–causes, diagnosis, and treatment”. BMJ. 328 (7451): 1306–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1306. PMC 420177. PMID 15166070.
            13. Al-Habib A, Elgamal EA, Aldhahri S, Alokaili R, AlShamrani R, Abobotain A, AlRaddadi K, Alkhalidi H (November 2016). “Large primary leiomyoma causing progressive cervical deformity”. J Surg Case Rep. 2016 (11). doi:10.1093/jscr/rjw190. PMC 5159177. PMID 27887011.
            14. Adaikkalam J (April 2016). “Lipoleiomyoma of Cervix”. J Clin Diagn Res. 10 (4): EJ01–2. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/16505.7531. PMID 27190823.
            15. Houser, L. Murray; Carrasco, C. H.; Sheehan, C. R. (1979). “Lipomatous tumour of the uterus: radiographic and ultrasonic appearance”. The British Journal of Radiology. 52 (624): 992–993. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-52-624-992. ISSN 0007-1285.
            16. Keriakos, Remon; Maher, Mark (2013). “Management of Cervical Fibroid during the Reproductive Period”. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013: 1–3. doi:10.1155/2013/984030. ISSN 2090-6684.
            17. Coronado GD, Marshall LM, Schwartz SM (May 2000). “Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study”. Obstet Gynecol. 95 (5): 764–9. PMID 10775744.
            18. Kamra, Hemlata T (2013). “Myxoid Leiomyoma of Cervix”. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6171.3805. ISSN 2249-782X.
            19. El-agwany, Ahmed Samy (2015). “Lipoleiomyoma of the uterine cervix: An unusual variant of uterine leiomyoma”. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 46 (1): 211–213. doi:10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.10.001. ISSN 0378-603X.
            20. Chaparala RP, Fawole AS, Ambrose NS, Chapman AH (March 2004). “Large bowel obstruction due to a benign uterine leiomyoma”. Gut. 53 (3): 386, 430. PMC 1773948. PMID 14960521.
            21. Yokoyama Y, Shinohara A, Hirokawa M, Maeda N (2003). “Erythrocytosis due to an erythropoietin-producing large uterine leiomyoma”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 56 (4): 179–83. doi:10.1159/000074104. PMID 14564105.
            22. Grace A, O’Connell N, Byrne P, Prendiville W, O’Donnell R, Royston D, Walsh CB, Leader M, Kay E (1999). “Malignant lymphoma of the cervix. An unusual presentation and a rare disease”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 20 (1): 26–8. PMID 10422676.
            23. Kanaan, Daniel; Parente, Daniella Braz; Constantino, Carolina Pesce Lamas; Souza, Rodrigo Canellas de (2012). “Linfoma de colo de útero: achados na ressonância magnética”. Radiologia Brasileira. 45 (3): 167–169. doi:10.1590/S0100-39842012000300009. ISSN 0100-3984.
            24. Frey NV, Svoboda J, Andreadis C, Tsai DE, Schuster SJ, Elstrom R, Rubin SC, Nasta SD (September 2006). “Primary lymphomas of the cervix and uterus: the University of Pennsylvania’s experience and a review of the literature”. Leuk. Lymphoma. 47 (9): 1894–901. doi:10.1080/10428190600687653. PMID 17065003.
            25. Wright JD, Rosenblum K, Huettner PC, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Powell MA, Gibb RK (November 2005). “Cervical sarcomas: an analysis of incidence and outcome”. Gynecol. Oncol. 99 (2): 348–51. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.021. PMID 16051326.
            26. Khosla, Divya; Gupta, Ruchi; Srinivasan, Radhika; Patel, Firuza D.; Rajwanshi, Arvind (2012). “Sarcomas of Uterine Cervix”. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 22 (6): 1026–1030. doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31825a97f6. ISSN 1048-891X.
            27. Miccò M, Sala E, Lakhman Y, Hricak H, Vargas HA (December 2015). “Imaging Features of Uncommon Gynecologic Cancers”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 205 (6): 1346–59. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12695. PMC 5502476. PMID 26587944.
            28. . doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31825a97f6. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
            29. Mitchell L, King M, Brillhart H, Goldstein A (September 2017). “Cervical Ectropion May Be a Cause of Desquamative Inflammatory Vaginitis”. Sex Med. 5 (3): e212–e214. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2017.03.001. PMC 5562466. PMID 28460993.
            30. Mitchell H (May 2004). “Vaginal discharge–causes, diagnosis, and treatment”. BMJ. 328 (7451): 1306–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1306. PMC 420177. PMID 15166070.
            31. Sharma, Abhishek; Ojha, Ranapratap; Sengupta, Parama; Chattopadhyay, Sarbani; Mondal, Soumit (2013). “Cervical intramural pregnancy: Report of a rare case”. Nigerian Medical Journal. 54 (4): 271. doi:10.4103/0300-1652.119670. ISSN 0300-1652.
            32. . doi:10.12865/CHSJ.42.02.11. Missing or empty |title= (help)
            33. Casey PM, Long ME, Marnach ML (February 2011). “Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 86 (2): 147–50, quiz 151. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0512. PMC 3031439. PMID 21270291.
            34. Mattson SK, Polk JP, Nyirjesy P (July 2016). “Chronic Cervicitis: Presenting Features and Response to Therapy”. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 20 (3): e30–3. doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000225. PMID 27243142.
            35. Rosenfeld WD, Clark J (June 1989). “Vulvovaginitis and cervicitis”. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 36 (3): 489–511. PMID 2660084.
            36. Meyer T (August 2016). “Diagnostic Procedures to Detect Chlamydia trachomatis Infections”. Microorganisms. 4 (3). doi:10.3390/microorganisms4030025. PMID 27681919.
            37. Woods, Jennifer L.; Bailey, Sarabeth L.; Hensel, Devon J.; Scurlock, Amy M. (2011). “Cervicitis in Adolescents: Do Clinicians Understand Diagnosis and Treatment?”. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 24 (6): 359–364. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2011.06.006. ISSN 1083-3188.
            38. Jayakumar, Naveen Kumar Bhagavathula (2015). “Cervicitis: How Often Is It Non-specific!”. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11594.5673. ISSN 2249-782X.
            39. Hsu AL, Khachikyan I, Stratton P (June 2010). “Invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis”. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 53 (2): 413–9. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181db7ce8. PMC 2880548. PMID 20436318.
            40. Chamié, Luciana Pardini; Blasbalg, Roberto; Pereira, Ricardo Mendes Alves; Warmbrand, Gisele; Serafini, Paulo Cesar (2011). “Findings of Pelvic Endometriosis at Transvaginal US, MR Imaging, and Laparoscopy”. RadioGraphics. 31 (4): E77–E100. doi:10.1148/rg.314105193. ISSN 0271-5333.
            41. Datta S, Kunde K (July 2008). “From vaginal discharge to endometriosis: an unusual case of endometriosis in pregnancy”. J Obstet Gynaecol. 28 (5): 552–3. doi:10.1080/01443610802247352. PMID 18850447.
            42. Chamié, Luciana Pardini; Blasbalg, Roberto; Pereira, Ricardo Mendes Alves; Warmbrand, Gisele; Serafini, Paulo Cesar (2011). “Findings of Pelvic Endometriosis at Transvaginal US, MR Imaging, and Laparoscopy”. RadioGraphics. 31 (4): E77–E100. doi:10.1148/rg.314105193. ISSN 0271-5333.
            43. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T (February 2004). “Laboratory testing for endometriosis”. Clin. Chim. Acta. 340 (1–2): 41–56. PMID 14734195.
            44. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Guerriero S, Savelli L, Paladini D, Lissoni AA, Czekierdowski A, Fischerova D, Zhang J, Mestdagh G, Testa AC, Bourne T, Valentin L, Timmerman D (June 2010). “Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 35 (6): 730–40. doi:10.1002/uog.7668. PMID 20503240.
            45. . doi:10.1148/rg.314105193. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
            46. Hoenderboom BM, van Benthem B, van Bergen J, Dukers-Muijrers N, Götz HM, Hoebe C, Hogewoning AA, Land JA, van der Sande M, Morré SA, van den Broek I (January 2019). “Relation between Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in a Dutch cohort of women previously tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial”. Sex Transm Infect. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2018-053778. PMID 30606817. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
            47. Jaiyeoba O, Soper DE (2011). “A practical approach to the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease”. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011: 753037. doi:10.1155/2011/753037. PMC 3148590. PMID 21822367.
            48. Czeyda-Pommersheim, Ferenc; Kalb, Bobby; Costello, James; Liau, Joy; Meshksar, Arash; Arif Tiwari, Hina; Martin, Diego (2016). “MRI in pelvic inflammatory disease: a pictorial review”. Abdominal Radiology. 42 (3): 935–950. doi:10.1007/s00261-016-1004-4. ISSN 2366-004X.
            49. Mitchell, Caroline; Prabhu, Malavika (2013). “Pelvic Inflammatory Disease”. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 27 (4): 793–809. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2013.08.004. ISSN 0891-5520.
            50. Filip G, Balzano A, Cagnacci A (November 2018). “Histological evaluation of the prevalence of adenomyosis, myomas and of their concomitance”. Minerva Ginecol. doi:10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04291-0. PMID 30486633.
            51. Fujino T, Watanabe T, Shinmura R, Hahn L, Nagata Y, Hasui K (December 1992). “Acute abdomen due to adenomyosis of the uterus: a case report”. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 18 (4): 333–7. PMID 1492806.
            52. Fujino T, Watanabe T, Shinmura R, Hahn L, Nagata Y, Hasui K (December 1992). “Acute abdomen due to adenomyosis of the uterus: a case report”. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 18 (4): 333–7. PMID 1492806.
            53. Zhou Y, Wu B, Li H (October 1996). “[The value of serum CA125 assays in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis]”. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi (in Chinese). 31 (10): 590–3. PMID 9275451.
            54. Tamai, Ken; Togashi, Kaori; Ito, Tsuyoshi; Morisawa, Nobuko; Fujiwara, Toshitaka; Koyama, Takashi (2005). “MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls”. RadioGraphics. 25 (1): 21–40. doi:10.1148/rg.251045060. ISSN 0271-5333.
            55. Dartmouth, Katherine (2014). “A systematic review with meta-analysis: the common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis”. Ultrasound. 22 (3): 148–157. doi:10.1177/1742271X14528837. ISSN 1742-271X.
            56. Mouhajer M, Obed S, Okpala AM (June 2017). “Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy in Resource Deprived Areas: A Rare and Difficult Diagnosis”. Ghana Med J. 51 (2): 94–97. PMC 5611908. PMID 28955106.
            57. Rathod, Setu; Samal, SunilKumar (2015). “Cervical ectopic pregnancy”. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 6 (1): 257. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.149221. ISSN 0976-9668.
            58. Tarney CM, Han J (2014). “Postcoital bleeding: a review on etiology, diagnosis, and management”. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014: 192087. doi:10.1155/2014/192087. PMC 4086375. PMID 25045355.
            59. Miccò, Maura; Sala, Evis; Lakhman, Yulia; Hricak, Hedvig; Vargas, Hebert Alberto (2015). “Imaging Features of Uncommon Gynecologic Cancers”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 205 (6): 1346–1359. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12695. ISSN 0361-803X.
            60. Kim, Hwi-Gon; Song, Yong Jung; Na, Yong Jin; Choi, Ook-Hwan (2013). “A Case of Vaginal Cancer with Uterine Prolapse”. Journal of Menopausal Medicine. 19 (3): 139. doi:10.6118/jmm.2013.19.3.139. ISSN 2288-6478.
            61. Karateke A, Tugrul S, Yakut Y, Gürbüz A, Cam C (2006). “Management of a case of primary vaginal cancer with irreducible massive uterine prolapse–a case report”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 27 (5): 528–30. PMID 17139994.
            62. van der Linden, M.; Meeuwis, K.A.P.; Bulten, J.; Bosse, T.; van Poelgeest, M.I.E.; de Hullu, J.A. (2016). “Paget disease of the vulva”. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 101: 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.008. ISSN 1040-8428.
            63. Lloyd J, Evans DJ, Flanagan AM (July 1999). “Extension of extramammary Paget disease of the vulva to the cervix”. J. Clin. Pathol. 52 (7): 538–40. PMC 501500. PMID 10605411.
            64. Shaco-Levy R, Bean SM, Vollmer RT, Papalas JA, Bentley RC, Selim MA, Robboy SJ (January 2010). “Paget disease of the vulva: a histologic study of 56 cases correlating pathologic features and disease course”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 29 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181b1cc5e. PMID 19952933.
            65. Asmouki, Hamid; Oumouloud, Rachid; Aboulfalah, Abderrahim; Soummani, Abderraouf; Marrat, Abdelouahed (2012). “Paget’s Disease of the Vulva in Premenopausal Woman Treated with Only Surgery: A Case Report”. Case Reports in Oncological Medicine. 2012: 1–4. doi:10.1155/2012/854827. ISSN 2090-6706.
            66. Gonçalves Amorim, Andressa; Batista Fraga Mendes, Brunelle; Neves Ferreira, Rodrigo; Chambô Filho, Antônio (2015). “Paget Disease of the Vulva: Diagnosis by Immunohistochemistry”. Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine. 2015: 1–5. doi:10.1155/2015/162483. ISSN 2090-6463.
            67. Casey PM, Long ME, Marnach ML (February 2011). “Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 86 (2): 147–50, quiz 151. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0512. PMC 3031439. PMID 21270291.
            68. Bin Park, Sung; Lee, Jong Hwa; Lee, Young Ho; Song, Mi Jin; Choi, Hye Jeong (2010). “Multilocular Cystic Lesions in the Uterine Cervix: Broad Spectrum of Imaging Features and Pathologic Correlation”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 195 (2): 517–523. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3619. ISSN 0361-803X.
            69. Torky, Haitham A. (2016). “Huge Nabothian cyst causing Hematometra (case report)”. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 207: 238–240. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.042. ISSN 0301-2115.
            70. Okamoto, Yoshikazu; Tanaka, Yumiko O.; Nishida, Masato; Tsunoda, Hajime; Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki; Itai, Yuji (2003). “MR Imaging of the Uterine Cervix: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation”. RadioGraphics. 23 (2): 425–445. doi:10.1148/rg.232025065. ISSN 0271-5333.
            71. Trobough GE (March 1978). “Pelvic pain and the IUD”. J Reprod Med. 20 (3): 167–74. PMID 347074.
            72. Nowitzki, Kristina M.; Hoimes, Matthew L.; Chen, Byron; Zheng, Larry Z.; Kim, Young H. (2015). “Ultrasonography of intrauterine devices”. Ultrasonography. 34 (3): 183–194. doi:10.14366/usg.15010. ISSN 2288-5919.
            73. . doi:10.5489/cuaj.11100. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)

            Template:WH Template:WS

            Epidemiology and Demographics

            Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

            Overview

            According to the Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) , cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease. One of every four deaths in the United States is due to cancer. Cervical cancer once was one of leading cause of mortality and cancer related death in women worldwide and in US, over the past 50 years, regular Pap smear screening caused significant drop in incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer. Cervical neoplasia still is very common in developing countries, studies shown there is an association between age and socoeconomic status of women and incidence of infection with human papilloma virus.

            Epidemiology and demographics

            • According to Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) , cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease. One of every four deaths in the United States is due to cancer. [1]
            • Cervical cancer once was one of leading cause of mortality and cancer related death in women worldwide and in US, over the past 50 years, regular Pap smear screening caused significant drop in incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer. In terms of frequency, it is ranked 14th now in the US but still is very common in least developed countries. [2]
            • In the United States, cervical cancer is more common among Hispanics, African-Americans, Asians and pascific islanders, and followed by whites. Native Alaskans and Indians have the lowest rate. Age of diagnosis is usually above 30 years old, in their midlife. Number of new cases of cervical cancer was 7.4 per 100,000 women per year and number of deaths was 2.3 per 100,000 women per year based on statistical datas collected on 2015. [3]
            • According to the American Cancer Society, estimates for cervical cancer in the United States for 2018 are: About 13,240 new cases of invasive cervical cancer will be diagnosed and about 4,170 women will die from cervical cancer. Based on recent CDC datas, States with highest rates of cervical cancers are Arkansas(10.4%), Louisiana(9.8%), Alabama(9.4%), Kentucky(9.4%), Texas(9.1%), Mississippi(9.1%), Kansas(9.0%), D.C(8.9%), Florida(8.7%), Nevada(8.7%).[3]

            References

            Template:WH Template:WS

            Risk Factors

            Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

            Overview

            The most common risk factor in development of cervical cancer is Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Other risk factors include smoking, increased number of sexual partners, and young age at time of first sexual intercourse, immunodeficiency, high parity.

            Risk Factor

            Common risk factors associated with cervical cancer include:[1][2]

            References

            1. Efird JT, Toland AE, Lea CS, Phillips CJ (March 2011). “The combined influence of oral contraceptives and human papillomavirus virus on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma”. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 5: 55–75. doi:10.4137/CMO.S6905. PMC 3076039. PMID 21499554.
            2. “Carcinoma of the cervix and tobacco smoking: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 13,541 women with carcinoma of the cervix and 23,017 women without carcinoma of the cervix from 23 epidemiological studies”. International Journal of Cancer. 118 (6): 1481–1495. 2006. doi:10.1002/ijc.21493. ISSN 0020-7136.

            Template:WH Template:WS

            Screening

            Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Assistant Editor-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]Monalisa Dmello, M.B,B.S., M.D. [3]

            Overview

            According to the American Cancer Society (ACS) (the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology participated in the 2021 update[1] but did not participate in this update):

            “individuals with a cervix initiate cervical cancer screening at age 25 years and undergo primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years through age 65 years (preferred); if primary HPV testing is not available, then individuals aged 25 to 65 years should be screened with cotesting (HPV testing in combination with cytology) every 5 years or cytology alone every 3 years (acceptable) (strong recommendation)..”[2]

            Importantly, self-sampling HPV testing is not yet approved by the FDA although this is a priority of the “Last Mile” initiative of the National Cancer Institute[3]

            Screening

            The Pap test screening detects and prevents the progression of HPV-induced cervical cancer and other abnormalities in the female genital tract by sampling cells from the outer opening of the cervix of the uterus and the endocervix. It is generally recommended that sexually active females seek pap smear testing annually, although guidelines may vary from country to country. [4][5][6][7][8][9]

              Screening Guidelines

              American Cancer Society (ACS), American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology

              2012 version (has since been updated in 2020

              U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)

              2018 guidelines

              American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
              When to start screening Age 21. Women aged <21 years should not be screened regardless of the age of sexual initiation or other risk factors Age 21. (A recommendation) Recommend against screening women aged <21 years (D recommendation) Age 21 regardless of the age of onset of sexual activity. Women aged <21 years should not be screened regardless of age at sexual initiation and other behavior-related risk factors (Level A evidence)
              Statement about annual screening Women of any age should not be screened annually by any screening method Individuals and clinicians can use the annual Pap test screening visit as an opportunity to discuss other health problems and preventive measures. Individuals, clinicians, and health systems should seek effective ways to facilitate the receipt of recommended preventive services at intervals that are beneficial to the patient. Efforts also should be made to ensure that individuals are able to seek care for additional health concerns as they present In women aged 30–65 years, annual cervical cancer screening should not be performed. (Level A evidence) Patients should be counseled that annual well-woman visits are recommended even if cervical cancer screening is not performed at each visit
              Screening method and intervals
              Cytology (conventional or liquid based) 21–29 years Every 3 years Every 3 years (A recommendation) Every 3 years (Level A evidence)
              30–65 years Every 3 years Every 3 years (A recommendation) Every 3 years (Level A evidence)
              HPV co-test (cytology + HPV test administered together) 21–29 years HPV co-testing should not be used for women aged <30 years Recommend against HPV co-testing in women aged <30 years (D recommendation) HPV co-testing should not be performed in women aged <30 years. (Level A evidence )
              30–65 years Every 5 years; this is the preferred method. For women who want to extend their screening interval, HPV co-testing every 5 years is an option (A recommendation) Every 5 years; this is the preferred method (Level A evidence)
              Primary hrHPV f testing (as an alternative to cotesting or g cytology alone) For women aged 30–65 years, screening by HPV testing alone is not recommended in most clinical settings Recommend against screening for cervical cancer with HPV testing (alone or in combination with cytology) in women aged <30 years (D recommendation) Not addressed
              When to stop screening Aged >65 years with adequate negative prior screening and no history of CIN2 or higher within the last 20 years Aged >65 years with adequate screening history and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer (D recommendation) Aged >65 years with adequate negative prior screening* results and no history of CIN 2 or higher (Level A evidence)
              When to screen after age 65 years When to screen after age 65 years Aged >65 years with a history of CIN2 CIN2, CIN3, or adenocarcinoma in situ, routine screening should continue for at least 20 years Women aged >65 years who have never been screened, do not meet the criteria for adequate prior screening, or for whom the adequacy of prior screening cannot be accurately accessed or documented. Routine screening should continue for at least 20 years after spontaneous regression or appropriate management of a high-grade precancerous lesion, even if this extends screening past age 65 years. Certain considerations may support screening in women aged > 65 years who are otherwise considered high risk (such as women with a highgrade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer, women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol, or women who are immunocompromised) Women aged >65 years with a history of CIN2, CIN3, or AIS should continue routine agebased screeningk for at least 20 years (Level B evidence)
              Screening post-hysterectomy Women who have had a total hysterectomy (removal of the uterus and cervix) should stop screening. Women who have had a supra-cervical hysterectomy (cervix intact) should continue screening according to guidelines Recommend against screening in women who have had a hysterectomy (removal of the cervix) (D recommendation) Women who have had a hysterectomy (removal of the cervix) should stop screening and not restart for any reason, (Level A evidence)
              The need for a bimanual pelvic exam Not addressed in 2012 guidelines but was addressed in 2002 ACS guidelines Addressed in USPSTF ovarian cancer screening recommendations. Aged <21 years, no evidence supports the routine internal examination of the healthy, asymptomatic patient. An “external-only” genital examination is acceptable. Aged ≥21 years, no evidence supports or refutes the annual pelvic examination or speculum and bimanual examination. The decision whether or not to perform a complete pelvic examination should be a shared decision after a discussion between the patient and her health care provider. Annual examination of the external genitalia should continue
              Screening among those immunized against HPV 16/18 Women at any age with a history of HPV vaccination should be screened according to the age specific recommendations for the general population The possibility that vaccination might reduce the need for screening with cytology alone or in combination with HPV testing is not established. Given these uncertainties, women who have been vaccinated should continue to be screened Women who have received the HPV vaccine should be screened according to the same guidelines as women who have not been vaccinated (Level C evidence)

              HPV = human papillomavirus; CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; AIS=adenocarcinoma in situ; hrHPV = high-risk HPV.

              See also

              Colposcopy

              References

              1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J; et al. (2012). “American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer”. CA Cancer J Clin. 62 (3): 147–72. doi:10.3322/caac.21139. PMC 3801360. PMID 22422631.
              2. Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Herzig A; et al. (2020). “Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society”. CA Cancer J Clin. 70 (5): 321–346. doi:10.3322/caac.21628. PMID 32729638 Check |pmid= value (help).
              3. https://prevention.cancer.gov/major-programs/nci-cervical-cancer-last-mile-initiative
              4. ecancermedicalscience. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2012.258. ISSN 1754-6605. Missing or empty |title= (help)
              5. Curry, Susan J.; Krist, Alex H.; Owens, Douglas K.; Barry, Michael J.; Caughey, Aaron B.; Davidson, Karina W.; Doubeni, Chyke A.; Epling, John W.; Kemper, Alex R.; Kubik, Martha; Landefeld, C. Seth; Mangione, Carol M.; Phipps, Maureen G.; Silverstein, Michael; Simon, Melissa A.; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B. (2018). “Screening for Cervical Cancer”. JAMA. 320 (7): 674. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.10897. ISSN 0098-7484.
              6. . doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001708. Check |doi= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)
              7. Huh, Warner K.; Ault, Kevin A.; Chelmow, David; Davey, Diane D.; Goulart, Robert A.; Garcia, Francisco A. R.; Kinney, Walter K.; Massad, L. Stewart; Mayeaux, Edward J.; Saslow, Debbie; Schiffman, Mark; Wentzensen, Nicolas; Lawson, Herschel W.; Einstein, Mark H. (2015). “Use of Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening”. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 125 (2): 330–337. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000669. ISSN 0029-7844.
              8. “Final Recommendation Statement: Cervical Cancer: Screening – US Preventive Services Task Force”.
              9. “Practice Advisory: Cervical Cancer Screening (Update) – ACOG”.

              Template:WH Template:WS

              Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

              Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nima Nasiri, M.D.[2]

              Overview

              Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and remains the most frequent cancer in specific high-burden regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa. There is an estimate of almost 260,000 deaths annually (2001), about 80% of which occurred in developing countries. Common complications of cervical cancer include pain, vaginal bleeding, fistula and renal failure. Prognosis is generally good, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with cervical cancer is approximately 70%. Studies have demonstrated that there is an association between age of the patients and socioeconomic status of women with higher incidence of infection with high risk HPV in underserved population in the US.

              Natural history

              • Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and remains the most frequent cancer in specific high-burden regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa. There is an estimate of almost 260,000 deaths annually, about 80% of which occurred in developing countries.[1]
              • Infection by high risk strain of oncogenic HPV types is an established cause of neoplastic lesions of the cervix, vagina and vulva, anus, penis and oropharynx. HPV genotypes 16 and 18 are responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. HPV is highly transmissible through direct skin-to-skin contact and intercourse, women with persistent high-risk HPV infections are at greatest risk for developing cervical cancer.
              • Since the identification of HPV as main cause of cervical cancer, prevention strategies have been developed by the introduction of HPV testing and cytology screening and utilizing HPV vaccines in preadolescent girls and young women who are at greater risk.[2]
              • The most important risk factors associated with the infection by HPV are young age at time of first sexual intercourse, increased number of sexual partners throughout life, or women being with men having multiple sexual partners. Male circumcision and use of condoms are factors that can reduce, but do not eliminate the transmission of human papilloma virus.[3]
              • There is an association between age and socioeconomic status of women in underserved areas of the US and higher incidence of infection with HPV. [4]

              Complications

              Advanced stage of cervical cancer can cause varieties of complications, some of which include:[5]

                Prognosis

                • The prognosis for patients with cervical cancer can vary significantly by stage at diagnosis, with an aggregate 5-year relative survival rate of 67.9%. This progress is largely attributable to annual screenings with Pap smears and the introduction of new preventive methods such as the HPV vaccination to decrease the mortality and incidence rates.
                • The majority of all cervical cancer cases can be detected early through the use of screening by Pap test and HPV DNA testing.

                References

                1. Sherris J, Herdman C, Elias C (October 2001). “Cervical cancer in the developing world”. West. J. Med. 175 (4): 231–3. PMC 1071564. PMID 11577044.
                2. Bosch, F. Xavier; Broker, Thomas R.; Forman, David; Moscicki, Anna-Barbara; Gillison, Maura L.; Doorbar, John; Stern, Peter L.; Stanley, Margaret; Arbyn, Marc; Poljak, Mario; Cuzick, Jack; Castle, Philip E.; Schiller, John T.; Markowitz, Lauri E.; Fisher, William A.; Canfell, Karen; Denny, Lynette A.; Franco, Eduardo L.; Steben, Marc; Kane, Mark A.; Schiffman, Mark; Meijer, Chris J.L.M.; Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy; Castellsagué, Xavier; Kim, Jane J.; Brotons, Maria; Alemany, Laia; Albero, Ginesa; Diaz, Mireia; Sanjosé, Silvia de (2013). “Comprehensive Control of Human Papillomavirus Infections and Related Diseases”. Vaccine. 31: I1–I31. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.026. ISSN 0264-410X.
                3. Castellsagué, Xavier (2008). “Natural history and epidemiology of HPV infection and cervical cancer”. Gynecologic Oncology. 110 (3): S4–S7. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.045. ISSN 0090-8258.
                4. Karuri AR, Kashyap VK, Yallapu MM, Zafar N, Kedia SK, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC (June 2017). “Disparity in rates of HPV infection and cervical cancer in underserved US populations”. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 9: 254–269. PMC 5935458. PMID 28410118.
                5. Schmitz, Herbert E.; Isaacs, John H. (1957). “Complications of Advanced Cervical Cancer and Their Management”. Radiology. 69 (3): 324–329. doi:10.1148/69.3.324. ISSN 0033-8419.
                6. Yuan, Chiou-Chung; Wang, Peng-Hui; Lai, Chiung-Ru; Tsu, En-Jie; Yen, Ming-Shyen; Ng, Heung-Tat (1999). “Recurrence and Survival Analyses of 1,115 Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Hysterectomy”. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 47 (2): 127–132. doi:10.1159/000010076. ISSN 0378-7346.
                7. B.K., Vishma; B., Prakash; Kulkarni, Praveen; M., Renuka (2016). “Survival and prognostic factors for cervical cancer: a hospital based study in Mysuru, India”. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health: 218–223. doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20151566. ISSN 2394-6032.
                8. Jung, Kyu-Won; Won, Young-Joo; Kong, Hyun-Joo; Oh, Chang-Mo; Shin, Aesun; Lee, Jin-Soo (2013). “Survival of Korean Adult Cancer Patients by Stage at Diagnosis, 2006-2010: National Cancer Registry Study”. Cancer Research and Treatment. 45 (3): 162–171. doi:10.4143/crt.2013.45.3.162. ISSN 1598-2998.
                9. Endo, Daisuke; Todo, Yukiharu; Okamoto, Kazuhira; Minobe, Shinichiro; Kato, Hidenori; Nishiyama, Noriaki (2015). “Prognostic factors for patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis in a Japanese cohort”. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 26 (1): 12. doi:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.12. ISSN 2005-0380.
                10. Kang, Woo Dae; Kim, Cheol Hong; Cho, Moon Kyoung; Kim, Jong Woon; Cho, Hye Yon; Kim, Yoon Ha; Choi, Ho Sun; Kim, Seok Mo (2011). “HPV-18 is a poor prognostic factor, unlike the HPV viral load, in patients with stage IB–IIA cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy”. Gynecologic Oncology. 121 (3): 546–550. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.01.015. ISSN 0090-8258.
                11. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Guy L, Cuthill S, Levine P, Serur E (January 1993). “Human immunodeficiency virus infection and invasive cervical carcinoma”. Cancer. 71 (2): 402–6. PMID 8093678.
                12. Kübler, Kirsten; Heinenberg, Sally; Rudlowski, Christian; Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise; Abramian, Alina; Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine; Büttner, Reinhard; Kuhn, Walther; Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich (2015). “c-myc copy number gain is a powerful prognosticator of disease outcome in cervical dysplasia”. Oncotarget. 6 (2). doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2706. ISSN 1949-2553.
                Diagnosis

                Diagnosis

                Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Diagnostic Studies

                Treatment

                Treatment

                Medical Therapy | Surgery | Pregnancy | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

                Case Studies

                Case Studies

                Case #1

                Template:WH Template:WS

                Looking for the patient version?

                Back to the patient-friendly article

                © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH