Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Melanoma

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[3]

Synonyms and keywords: Malignant melanoma; Acral lentiginous melanoma; Lentiginous melanoma; Lentigo maligna melanoma; Nodular melanoma; Amelanotic melanoma; Familial melanoma; Non-pigmented melanoma; MM; Metastatic melanoma; Metastatic malignant melanoma; Cutaneous melanoma; Actinic melanosis; Solar melanoma; Melanose; Malignant nevus; Melanocyte malignancy; Melanotic cancer

Overview


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.; Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]

Overview

Malignant melanoma is the most common fatal skin cancer that arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150 – 200 per 100,000 individuals. It may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome). Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 subtypes of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations (multiple hits). The progression to melanoma usually involves the serinethreonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the subtype of melanoma and amelanotic (no pigmentation) melanomas are not uncommon. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each subtype of melanoma has unique characteristic features. The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs both horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver, and skin (distant site). The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is highly dependent on the stage at diagnosis. Staging is based on the 2010 AJCC TNM Classification and is divided into stage 0 or melanoma in situ, stage I or invasive melanoma with good prognosis, stage II or high-risk melanoma, stage III or melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis, and stage IV or melanoma with distant metastasis. The predominant treatment for primary melanoma is wide excision of the lesion margins. The choice of clinical margins is based on the tumor thickness. When lymph nodes are involved, complete dissection of the nodal basin is recommended. Chemotherapy is indicated for high risk melanomas (stages IIB-IV) as adjuvant therapy and for metastatic disease as first-line therapy. Once diagnosed, follow-up at regular intervals is recommended.

Historical Perspective

Melanoma was first described by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC. It was often described as the fatal black tumor. In 1838, the term melanoma was first proposed by Sir Robert Carswell, a British pathologist. In 1956, Henry Lancaster, an Australian mathematician, was the first to discover the association between UV radiation exposure and development of melanoma. In 2003, BRAF mutations were first identified in the pathogenesis of melanoma.

Classification

Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 subtypes of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Less common subtypes of melanoma include desmoplastic/spindle cell melanoma, nevoid melanoma, spitzoid melanocytic melanoma, angiotropic melanoma, blue nevus-like melanoma, and composite melanoma.

Pathophysiology

Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations. The progression to melanoma usually involves the serinethreonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the subtype of melanoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each subtype of melanoma has unique characteristic features. All patients with suspected melanoma require biopsy. Findings on biopsy may distinguish the subtype and the stage of melanoma.

Causes

Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome).

Differential Diagnosis

Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as other skin cancers, premalignant skin tumors, and benign skin lesions.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150 – 200 per 100,000 individuals. The majority of patients are diagnosed after the age of 65 years. Melanoma is more common among males and individuals of Caucasian race.

Risk Factors

The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Other risk factors include old age, male gender, family history of melanoma, personal history of skin cancers, immunodeficiency, and certain hereditary disorders.

Screening

The 1992-1994 free American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program provided broad skin cancer educationalinformation to general public and enabled thousands of free expert skin cancer examinations. The 2001-2005 American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program emphasized on the use of HARMM criteria to identify the higher-risk subgroup of skin cancer screening population via assessment of multiple risk factors for MM hence, both reducing the cost & increasing the yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives. MelanomaGenetics Program identifies the genetic causes of skin cancer, and provides genetic counseling to the individuals with strong family history of melanoma. Dermoscopy usage improves the ability of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer, thus saving from unnecessary expert consultations. Combination of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) in a primary care setting doubles the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosisand leads to >50% chance of reduction in excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Melanoma is an aggressive tumor characterized by early metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver, and skin (distant site). Complications of melanoma are usually related to the site of metastasis. The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is approximately 93%. Features associated with worse prognosis are tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), depth related to skin structures (Clark level), type of melanoma, presence of ulceration, presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion, location of lesion, presence of satellite lesions, and presence of regional or distant metastasis.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of melanoma include a rapidly growing existing nevus, non-healing skin ulcers, pruritus, or bone pain.

Physical Examination

Physical examination findings suggestive of malignant melanoma include ABCDE: Asymmetry of lesion, Border irregularity, Color change, large Diameter, and Evolution over time.

Laboratory Findings

There are no laboratory findings associated with the diagnosis of melanoma. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) may be elevated among patients with metastasis.

Biopsy

All patients with suspected melanoma require biopsy. Findings on biopsy may distinguish the subtype and the stage of melanoma.

Staging

Staging of melanoma is essential to determine the prognosis. Staging is based on the 2010 AJCC TNM Classification and is divided into stage 0 or melanoma in situ, stage I or invasive melanoma with good prognosis, stage II or high-risk melanoma, stage III or melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis, and stage IV or melanoma with distant metastasis.

Chest X Ray

There are no chest x-ray findings associated with melanoma.

CT

There are no CT scan findings associated with melanoma. Chest CT scan is recommended for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).

MRI

There are no MRI scan findings associated with melanoma. Brain MRI may be considered for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

There are no ultrasound findings associated with melanoma.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no PET scan findings associated with melanoma. Chest PET scan may be considered for diagnosis of metastatic lesions among patients who have been diagnosed with stage IA-IV melanoma and for secondary prevention of melanoma among patients who were previously diagnosed with stage IIB-IV melanoma (annually for 5 years).

Other Diagnostic Studies

No additional tests are recommended for the diagnosis of melanoma.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Chemotherapy is indicated for high risk melanomas (stages IIB-IV) as adjuvant therapy and for metastatic disease as first-line therapy. Several single agent and combination regimens have been studied, all with modest impact on survival. All current guidelines still recommend enrollment in clinical trials over current available regimens for patients with metastatic disease. Interferon therapy is the only regimen recommended as adjuvant therapy.

Surgery

The predominant treatment for primary melanoma is wide excision of the lesion margins. The choice of clinical margins is based on the tumor thickness. When lymph nodes are involved, complete dissection of the nodal basin is recommended.

Primary Prevention

Primary prevention of melanoma includes avoidance of sunlight/ultraviolet radiation exposure.

Secondary Prevention

The choice of work-up for secondary prevention of melanoma is based on the stage of melanoma at diagnosis. Secondary prevention includes monthly self-exams, routine dermatologic evaluations, and chest and brain imaging.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Melanoma was first described by Hippocrates in the 5th century BC. It was often described as the fatal black tumor. In 1838, the term melanoma was first proposed by Sir Robert Carswell, a British pathologist. In 1956, Henry Lancaster, an Australian mathematician, was the first to discover the association between UV radiation exposure and development of melanoma. In 2003, BRAF mutations were first identified in the pathogenesis of melanoma.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Karamanou M, Liappas I, Stamboulis E, Lymperi M, Kyriakis K, Androutsos G (2012). “Sir Robert Carswell (1793-1857): coining the term “melanoma. J BUON. 17 (2): 400–2. PMID 22740229.
  2. Urteaga O, Pack GT (1966). “On the antiquity of melanoma”. Cancer. 19 (5): 607–10. PMID 5326247.
  3. Norris W. (1820). “Case of fungoid disease”. Edinb Med Surg J. 16: 562–565.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Rebecca VW, Sondak VK, Smalley KS (2012). “A brief history of melanoma: from mummies to mutations”. Melanoma Res. 22 (2): 114–22. doi:10.1097/CMR.0b013e328351fa4d. PMC 3303163. PMID 22395415.
  5. LANCASTER HO (1956). “Some geographical aspects of the mortality from melanoma in Europeans”. Med J Aust. 43 (26): 1082–7. PMID 13347440.
  6. Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, Denoyelle C, Kuilman T, van der Horst CM; et al. (2005). “BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi”. Nature. 436 (7051): 720–4. doi:10.1038/nature03890. PMID 16079850.
  7. Breslow A, Macht SD (1977). “Optimal size of resection margin for thin cutaneous melanoma”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 145 (5): 691–2. PMID 910211.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Melanoma may be classified into either cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanomas. The most common 4 sub-types of cutaneous melanoma include superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma. Less common sub-types of melanoma include desmoplastic/spindle cell melanoma, nevoid melanoma, spitzoid melanocytic melanoma, angiotropic melanoma, blue nevus-like melanoma, and composite melanoma.

Classification of Melanoma

Shown below is a table that demonstrates the various sub-classes of melanoma:[1][2]

Subtype Frequency Clinical Features
Common Subtypes
Superficial spreading melanoma 70%
  • Most common sub-type
  • Usually affects sun exposed sites among both men and women aged 50-70 years
  • Characterized by the presence of abundant junctional intra-epidermal spread of malignant melanocytes
Nodular melanoma 15-25%
  • Second most common subtype
  • Usually affects sun exposed sites among both men and women aged 50-70 years
  • Characterized by the absence of junctional intra-epidermal spread of malignant melanocytes
Acral lentiginous melanoma 5%
Lentigo maligna melanoma 1-5%
Non-cutaneous melanoma 5%
Less Common Subtypes
Desmoplastic/Spindle cell melanoma Rare
  • Lesion typically amelanotic and has a morphology similar to a scar tissue
  • Appears indolent but is highly infiltrative
  • Characterized by local recurrence and perineural spread
  • Usually affects males aged 60-70 years in sun exposed sites
  • May be de novo or can be associated with a pre-existing melanoma
  • Has several subtypes:
Nevoid melanoma Rare
Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasm Rare
Angiotropic melanoma Rare
Blue nevus-like melanoma Rare
  • Melanoma that develops from a pre-existing blue nevus
  • One of the rarest forms of melanoma
  • Appears as a blue nevus that has recently been rapidly expanding with irregular contours
  • Typically affects middle-aged men
Composite melanoma Rare

References

  1. Schanderdorf D, Kochs C, Livingstone E (2013). Handbook of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer.
  2. Mooi W, Krausz T (2007). Pathology of Melanocytic Disorders 2nd Ed. CRC Press.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Development of melanoma is the result of multiple genetic mutations. The progression to melanoma usually involves the serine-threonine kinases of the MAPK/ERK pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase) following mutation of either the N-RAS or BRAF oncogene. On gross pathology, the majority of melanomas appear as hyperkeratotic, black-brown, asymmetric nodules with irregular borders, but the morphology of the lesion mostly depends on the sub-type of melanoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, each sub-type of melanoma has unique characteristic features.

Pathophysiology

Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties).

Genetics

Pathology

Melanoma Subtype Features on Gross Pathology Features on Histopathological Microscopic Analysis
Superficial spreading melanoma
  • Brown/black color, but may include reddish brown or white
  • Hyperkeratotic, diffused borders with no distinct demarcation
  • Irregular and elevated
Nodular melanoma
  • Tan/reddish brown color
  • Sharp borders
  • Well-demarcated, dome-shaped papular/verrucous lesion
Acral lentiginous melanoma
  • Brown/black color, but may include reddish brown or white
  • Hyperkeratotic, diffused borders with no distinct demarcation
  • Irregular and elevated
Lentigo maligna melanoma
  • Brown/black color, but may include reddish brown or white
  • Hyperkeratotic, diffused borders with no distinct demarcation
  • Irregular and elevated
Non-cutaneous melanoma
Desmoplastic/Spindle cell melanoma
Nevoid melanoma
Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasm
Angiotropic melanoma
Blue nevus-like melanoma
Composite melanoma

Features of more than one sub-type on gross pathology

  • Features of more than one sub-type on microscopic analysis
  • May be characterized by one of the following:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Miller AJ, Mihm MC (2006). “Melanoma”. N Engl J Med. 355 (1): 51–65. doi:10.1056/NEJMra052166. PMID 16822996.
  2. Schanderdorf D, Kochs C, Livingstone E (2013). Handbook of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer.
  3. Mooi W, Krausz T (2007). Pathology of Melanocytic Disorders 2nd Ed. CRC Press.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photo-protective properties). Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes (e.g. familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome).

Causes

Malignant melanoma arises from the epidermal melanocytes, which are neural crest cells involved in the synthesis of melanin (a brown pigment with photoprotective properties). Melanoma may be caused by sporadic genetic mutations (e.g. BRAF and/or N-RAS) or may be part of familial syndromes.[1]

Sporadic Melanoma

Familial Melanoma

Melanoma may be caused by hereditary diseases (10%) and is associated with mutations of the P16/CDKN2A gene:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 O’Brien O, Lyons T, Murphy S, Feeley L, Power D, Heffron C (November 2017). “BRAF V600 mutation detection in melanoma: a comparison of two laboratory testing methods”. J. Clin. Pathol. 70 (11): 935–940. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204367. PMID 28424234. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  2. Wong K, Robles-Espinoza CD, Rodriguez D, Rudat SS, Puig S, Potrony M, Wong CC, Hewinson J, Aguilera P, Puig-Butille JA, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Zattara H, van der Weyden L, Fletcher C, Brenn T, Arends MJ, Quesada V, Newton-Bishop JA, Lopez-Otin C, Bishop DT, Harms PW, Johnson TM, Durham AB, Lombard DB, Adams DJ (December 2018). “Association of the POT1 Germline Missense Variant p.I78T With Familial Melanoma”. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3662. PMID 30586141. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  3. Ponti G, Manfredini M, Greco S, Pellacani G, Depenni R, Tomasi A, Maccaferri M, Cascinu S (December 2017). “BRAF, NRAS and C-KIT Advanced Melanoma: Clinico-pathological Features, Targeted-Therapy Strategies and Survival”. Anticancer Res. 37 (12): 7043–7048. doi:10.21873/anticanres.12175. PMID 29187493.
  4. Parekh V, Sobanko J, Miller CJ, Karakousis G, Xu W, Letrero R, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Elder DE, Amaravadi R, Schuchter LM, Nathanson KL, Wilson MA, Chu EY (December 2018). “NRAS Q61R and BRAF G466A mutations in atypical melanocytic lesions newly arising in advanced melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib”. J. Cutan. Pathol. doi:10.1111/cup.13401. PMID 30552700.
  5. Perkins A, Duffy RL (June 2015). “Atypical moles: diagnosis and management”. Am Fam Physician. 91 (11): 762–7. PMID 26034853.
  6. Cremin C, Howard S, Le L, Karsan A, Schaeffer DF, Renouf D, Schrader KA (2018). “CDKN2A founder mutation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients without cutaneous features of Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome”. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 16: 7. doi:10.1186/s13053-018-0088-y. PMC 5842519. PMID 29541281.
  7. Chan AK, Han SJ, Choy W, Beleford D, Aghi MK, Berger MS, Shieh JT, Bollen AW, Perry A, Phillips JJ, Butowski N, Solomon DA (2017). “Familial melanoma-astrocytoma syndrome: synchronous diffuse astrocytoma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in a patient with germline CDKN2A/B deletion and a significant family history”. Clin. Neuropathol. 36 (5): 213–221. doi:10.5414/NP301022. PMC 5628627. PMID 28699883.
Differentiating Melanoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as other skin cancers, premalignant skin tumors, and benign skin lesions.

Differential Diagnosis

Melanoma must be differentiated from other causes of skin lesions, such as:

Oral melanoma must be differentiated from other mouth lesions such as oral candidiasis and aphthous ulcer

Disease Presentation Risk Factors Diagnosis Affected Organ Systems Important features Picture
Diseases predominantly affecting the oral cavity
Oral Candidiasis
  • Denture users
  • As a side effect of medication, most commonly having taken antibiotics. Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of lung conditions (e.g, asthma or COPD) may also result in oral candidiasis which may be reduced by regularly rinsing the mouth with water after taking the medication.
  • Clinical diagnosis
  • Confirmatory tests rarely needed
Localized candidiasis

Invasive candidasis

Tongue infected with oral candidiasis – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=11717223.jpg
Herpes simplex oral lesions
  • Stress
  • Recent URTI
  • Female sex
  • The symptoms of primary HSV infection generally resolve within two weeks
Oral herpes simplex infection – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=19051042.jpg
Aphthous ulcers
  • Painful, red spot or bump that develops into an open ulcer
  • Physical examination
  • Diagnosis of exclusion
  • Oral cavity
  • Self-limiting , Pain decreases in 7 to 10 days, with complete healing in 1 to 3 weeks
By Ebarruda – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, httpscommons.wikimedia.orgwindex.phpcurid=7903358
Squamous cell carcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma – By Luca Pastore, Maria Luisa Fiorella, Raffaele Fiorella, Lorenzo Lo Muzio – http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/showImageLarge.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0050212.g001, CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15252632
Leukoplakia
  • Vulvar lesions occur independent of oral lesions
Leukoplakia – By Aitor III – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9873087
Melanoma
Oral melanoma – By Emmanouil K Symvoulakis, Dionysios E Kyrmizakis, Emmanouil I Drivas, Anastassios V Koutsopoulos, Stylianos G Malandrakis, Charalambos E Skoulakis and John G Bizakis – Symvoulakis et al. Head & Face Medicine 2006 2:7 doi:10.1186/1746-160X-2-7 (Open Access), [1], CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9839811
Fordyce spots
Fordyce spots – Por Perene – Obra do próprio, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=19772899
Burning mouth syndrome
Torus palatinus
Torus palatinus – By Photo taken by dozenist, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=846591
Diseases involving oral cavity and other organ systems
Behcet’s disease
Behcet’s disease – By Ahmet Altiner MD, Rajni Mandal MD – http://dermatology.cdlib.org/1611/articles/18_2009-10-20/2.jpg, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17863021
Crohn’s disease
Agranulocytosis
Syphilis[25]
oral syphilis – By CDC/Susan Lindsley – http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20021114/34/PHIL_2385_lores.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2134349
Coxsackie virus
  • Symptomatic treatment
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
Chicken pox
Chickenpox – By James Heilman, MD – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=52872565
Measles
  • Unvaccinated individuals[26][27]
  • Crowded and/or unsanitary conditions
  • Traveling to less developed and developing countries
  • Immunocompromized
  • Winter and spring seasons
  • Born after 1956 and never fully vaccinated
  • Health care workers
Koplick spots (Measles) – By CDC – http://phil.cdc.gov/PHIL_Images/20040908/4f54ee8f0e5f49f58aaa30c1bc6413ba/6111_lores.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=824483

References

  1. Dumitrache N, Neiderer K, Martin B, Dancho J (2013). “Angiokeratoma presenting as a melanoma: a case report”. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 103 (3): 241–2. PMID 23697732.
  2. Pujani M, Hassan MJ, Jetley S (2015). “Atypical fibroxanthoma in a young female misdiagnosed clinically as a malignant melanoma–An unusual presentation”. J Cancer Res Ther. 11 (4): 1027. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.150353. PMID 26881598.
  3. AlJasser MI, Martinka M, Kalia S (January 2014). “Dermatofibroma mimicking melanoma dermoscopically”. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 39 (1): 69–70. doi:10.1111/ced.12155. PMID 24256198.
  4. Bahuau M, Vidaud D, Kujas M, Palangié A, Assouline B, Chaignaud-Lebreton M, Prieur M, Vidaud M, Harpey JP, Lafourcade J, Caille B (1997). “Familial aggregation of malignant melanoma/dysplastic naevi and tumours of the nervous system: an original syndrome of tumour proneness”. Ann. Genet. 40 (2): 78–91. PMID 9259954.
  5. Uzzauto MT (January 2015). “Melanoma hidden in a hemangioma”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 72 (1 Suppl): S56–7. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.011. PMID 25500044.
  6. Wakimoto H, Harada K, Arai T, Maeda T, Irisawa R, Tsuboi R (February 2017). “Reduced expression of the ATP2A2 gene in vemurafenib-induced keratoacanthoma-like papules in a melanoma patient”. Int. J. Dermatol. 56 (2): e33–e35. doi:10.1111/ijd.13430. PMID 27805257.
  7. Charifa A, Chen C. PMID 29489150. Vancouver style error: initials (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  8. Imafuku K, Hata H, Yanagi T, Kitamura S, Inamura-Takashima Y, Nishimura M, Kitamura S, Moriwaki S, Shimizu H (July 2017). “Multiple skin cancers in patients with mycosis fungoides after long-term ultraviolet phototherapy”. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 42 (5): 523–526. doi:10.1111/ced.13121. PMID 28543586.
  9. Gu GM, Epstein JB, Morton TH (October 2003). “Intraoral melanoma: long-term follow-up and implication for dental clinicians. A case report and literature review”. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 96 (4): 404–13. doi:10.1016/S1079210403003202. PMID 14561964.
  10. Kelati A, Baybay H, Moscarella E, Argenziano G, Gallouj S, Mernissi FZ (November 2017). “Dermoscopy of Pigmented Actinic Keratosis of the Face: A Study of 232 Cases”. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 108 (9): 844–851. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2017.05.002. PMID 28705516.
  11. Campagnoli TR, Medina CA, Singh AD (2016). “CHOROIDAL MELANOMA INITIALLY TREATED AS HEMANGIOMA: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CONSIDERATIONS”. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 10 (2): 175–82. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000000220. PMID 26448544.
  12. Borgenvik TL, Karlsvik TM, Ray S, Fawzy M, James N (May 2017). “Blue nevus-like and blue nevus-associated melanoma: a comprehensive review of the literature”. ANZ J Surg. 87 (5): 345–349. doi:10.1111/ans.13946. PMID 28318130.
  13. Hussain A, Sidiropoulos M, Das S, Munoz DG, Nijhawan N (June 2017). “Orbital cellular blue nevus complicated by malignant melanoma”. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 52 (3): e111–e113. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.025. PMID 28576220.
  14. Ribeiro F, Leocadia E, Macarenco RS, Lapins J, Huet P, Akay BN, Steiner D (July 2017). “Reticulated acanthoma with sebaceous differentiation mimicking melanoma”. Dermatol Pract Concept. 7 (3): 35–37. doi:10.5826/dpc.0703a07. PMC 5661163. PMID 29085717.
  15. Carrera C, Segura S, Aguilera P, Scalvenzi M, Longo C, Barreiro A, Broganelli P, Cavicchini S, Llambrich A, Zaballos P, Thomas L, Malvehy J, Puig S, Zalaudek I (June 2017). “Dermoscopic Clues for Diagnosing Melanomas That Resemble Seborrheic Keratosis”. JAMA Dermatol. 153 (6): 544–551. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0129. PMC 5540029. PMID 28355453.
  16. Braun RP, Ludwig S, Marghoob AA (September 2017). “Differential Diagnosis of Seborrheic Keratosis: Clinical and Dermoscopic Features”. J Drugs Dermatol. 16 (9): 835–842. PMID 28915278.
  17. Cohen DN, Lumbang WA, Boyd AS, Sosman JA, Zwerner JP (May 2014). “Spindle cell squamous carcinoma during BRAF inhibitor therapy for advanced melanoma: an aggressive secondary neoplasm of undetermined biologic potential”. JAMA Dermatol. 150 (5): 575–7. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.7784. PMID 24577111.
  18. Boespflug A, Debarbieux S, Depaepe L, Chouvet B, Maucort-Boulch D, Dalle S, Balme B, Thomas L (April 2018). “Association of subungual melanoma and subungual squamous cell carcinoma: A case series”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78 (4): 760–768. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.038. PMID 28947295.
  19. Tchernev G, Chokoeva AA, Wollina U, Lotti T (May 2016). “Persistent subungual and periungual hematoma versus melanoma: to cut it or to leave it?”. Dermatol Ther. 29 (3): 150–1. doi:10.1111/dth.12293. PMID 26333508.
  20. Deinlein T, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Zalaudek I (November 2016). “Acral melanoma mimicking subungual hematoma”. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 75 (5): e181–e183. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.02.1222. PMID 27745646.
  21. Damsky WE, Bosenberg M (October 2017). “Melanocytic nevi and melanoma: unraveling a complex relationship”. Oncogene. 36 (42): 5771–5792. doi:10.1038/onc.2017.189. PMC 5930388. PMID 28604751.
  22. Rodrigues M (April 2017). “Skin Cancer Risk (Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers/Melanoma) in Vitiligo Patients”. Dermatol Clin. 35 (2): 129–134. doi:10.1016/j.det.2016.11.003. PMID 28317522.
  23. Ann M. Gillenwater, Nadarajah Vigneswaran, Hanadi Fatani, Pierre Saintigny & Adel K. El-Naggar (2013). “Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL): a review of an elusive pathologic entity!”. Advances in anatomic pathology. 20 (6): 416–423. doi:10.1097/PAP.0b013e3182a92df1. PMID 24113312. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  24. Andrès E, Zimmer J, Affenberger S, Federici L, Alt M, Maloisel F. (2006). “Idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis: Update of an old disorder”. Eur J Intern Med. 17 (8): 529–35. Text “pmid 17142169” ignored (help)
  25. title=”By Internet Archive Book Images [No restrictions], via Wikimedia Commons” href=”https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_manual_of_syphilis_and_the_venereal_diseases%2C_(1900)_(14595882378).jpg
  26. Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, Hoffman RE (2000). “Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization”. JAMA. 284 (24): 3145–50. PMID 11135778.
  27. Ratnam S, West R, Gadag V, Williams B, Oates E (1996). “Immunity against measles in school-aged children: implications for measles revaccination strategies”. Can J Public Health. 87 (6): 407–10. PMID 9009400.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[3]

Overview

The prevalence of melanoma is approximately 150-200 per 100,000 individuals. The majority of patients are diagnosed after the age of 65 years. Melanoma is more common among males and individuals of the Caucasian race. In 2025, cutaneous melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the U.S.[1], and by 2040, it is expected to become the second most common. [2]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • In the United States, the age-adjusted prevalence of melanoma was 187 per 100,000 individuals in 2011.[3]

Incidence

  • The delay-adjusted incidence of melanoma in 2011 was estimated to be 23.21 per 100,000 persons in the United States.[3]
  • In 2011, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma was 22.74 per 100,000 persons in the United States.[3]
  • In 2025, an estimated 104,960 new cases of cutaneous melanoma are expected in the U.S., comprising 60,550 in males and 44,410 in females.[1]

Age

  • While the overall age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in the United States between 2007 and 2011 is 21.3 per 100,000, the age-adjusted incidence of melanoma by age category is:[3]
    • Under 65 years: 12.6 per 100,000
    • 65 and over: 81.1 per 100,000
  • Shown below is an image that demonstrates the delay-adjusted incidence and observed incidence of melanoma by age and gender in the United States between 1975 and 2011. These graphs are adapted from SEER: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute.[3]

Delay-adjusted incidence and observed incidence of melanoma by age and gender in the United States between 1975 and 2011

Gender

  • There is a slight male preponderance to the development of melanoma.
  • The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2-1.6 to 1.
  • Between 1999 and 2021, melanoma incidence rose by 57.5% in females and 47.4% in males based on age-adjusted rates.
  • The image below shows trends in melanoma incidence by gender from 1999 to 2021.[4]

Race

  • There is a racial preponderance to the development of melanoma, where Caucasian individuals are at a significantly increased risk compared to dark-skinned individuals.
  • Shown below is a table that demonstrates the age-adjusted prevalence of melanoma by race in 2011 in the United States.[3]
All Races White Black Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic
Age-adjusted prevalence 187 per 100,000 234.5 per 100,000 7.5 per 100,000 11.1 per 100,000 37.9 per 100,000
  • Shown below is a table that demonstrates the annual age-adjusted incidence of melanoma by race in 2024 in the United States.[2]
Race Asian Black Hispanic Native American Hispanic
Age-adjusted incidence 1.3 per 100,000 1.0 per 100,000 4.8 per 100,000 10.3 per 100,000 30.6 per 100,000
  • Shown below is an image depicting the trends for incidence of melanoma by race in the United States between 1999 and 2021.[4]


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A (2025). “Cancer statistics, 2025”. CA Cancer J Clin. 75 (1): 10–45. doi:10.3322/caac.21871. PMC 11745215 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 39817679 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A (2024). “Cancer statistics, 2024”. CA Cancer J Clin. 74 (1): 12–49. doi:10.3322/caac.21820. PMID 38230766 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z,Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Okobi OE, Abreo E, Sams NP, Chukwuebuni OH, Tweneboa Amoako LA, Wiredu B, Uboh EE, Ekechi VC, Okafor AA (October 2024). “Trends in Melanoma Incidence, Prevalence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival: An Analysis of the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) Database”. Cureus. 16 (10): e70697. doi:10.7759/cureus.70697. PMC 11529802 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 39493095 Check |pmid= value (help).


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

The two most potent risk factors in the development of melanoma are light-colored skin and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Other risk factors include old age, male gender, family history of melanoma, personal history of skin cancers, immunodeficiency, and certain hereditary disorders.

Risk Factors

Risk Factors
Heritable
  • Lighter skin pigmentation that burns easily (*Fitzpatrick phototype 1 and 2).[3]
  • Eye pigmentation (blue, green, hazel, gray).[3]
  • Family history of melanoma in a first-degree relative (18-24). [1]
  • Hereditary diseases including:
Modifiable
  • Sunburn
  • Tanning bed use
  • immunosuppression:[3]
  • Kidney transplant recipient.
  • Solid organ transplant recipient.
  • Exposure to environmental chemicals such as:
Non-modifiable Risk Factors

* Fitzpack Patrick phototypes: Ⅰ( always burns, never tans), Ⅱ ( usually burns, tans less than average), Ⅲ ( sometimes mild burns, tans about average), and IV( rarely burns, tans more than average).[9]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ghiasvand R, Rueegg CS, Weiderpass E, Green AC, Lund E, Veierød MB (February 2017). “Indoor Tanning and Melanoma Risk: Long-Term Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study”. Am. J. Epidemiol. 185 (3): 147–156. doi:10.1093/aje/kww148. PMID 28077359.
  2. Leiter U, Garbe C (2008). “Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer–the role of sunlight”. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 624: 89–103. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_8. PMID 18348450.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Joshi UM, Kashani-Sabet M, Kirkwood JM (August 2025). “Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13074. PMID 40853557 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. Herraiz C, Jiménez-Cervantes C, Sánchez-Laorden B, García-Borrón JC (June 2018). “Functional interplay between secreted ligands and receptors in melanoma”. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 78: 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.021. PMID 28676423.
  5. Francis JH, Levin AM, Abramson DH (2016). “Update on Ophthalmic Oncology 2014: Retinoblastoma and Uveal Melanoma”. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 5 (5): 368–82. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000213. PMID 27632029.
  6. Naouali C, Jones M, Nabouli I, Jerbi M, Tounsi H, Ben Rekaya M, Ben Ahmed M, Bouhaouala B, Messaoud O, Khaled A, Zghal M, Abdelhak S, Boubaker S, Yacoub-Youssef H (January 2017). “Epidemiological trends and clinicopathological features of cutaneous melanoma in sporadic and xeroderma pigmentosum Tunisian patients”. Int. J. Dermatol. 56 (1): 40–48. doi:10.1111/ijd.13448. PMID 27785785.
  7. Yin L, Pang G, Niu C, Habasi M, Dou J, Aisa HA (June 2018). “A novel psoralen derivative-MPFC enhances melanogenesis via activation of p38 MAPK and PKA signaling pathways in B16 cells”. Int. J. Mol. Med. 41 (6): 3727–3735. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3529. PMID 29512683.
  8. Müller C, Wendt J, Rauscher S, Sunder-Plassmann R, Richtig E, Fae I, Fischer G, Okamoto I (December 2018). “Risk Factors of Subsequent Primary Melanomas in Austria”. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4645. PMID 30566178.
  9. Gupta V, Sharma VK (2019). “Skin typing: Fitzpatrick grading and others”. Clin Dermatol. 37 (5): 430–436. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.07.010. PMID 31896400.
Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D. Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]

Overview

The 1992-1994 free American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program provided broad skin cancer educational information to general public and enabled thousands of free expert skin cancer examinations. The 2001-2005 American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program emphasized on the use of HARMM criteria to identify the higher-risk subgroup of skin cancer screening population via assessment of multiple risk factors for MM hence, both reducing the cost & increasing the yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives. Melanoma Genetics Program identifies the genetic causes of skin cancer, and provides genetic counseling to the individuals with strong family history of melanoma. Dermoscopy usage improves the ability of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer, thus saving from unnecessary expert consultations. Combination of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) in a primary care setting doubles the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis and leads to >50% chance of reduction in excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions.

Screening

According to different studies going on for so many years, following data is available regarding the different methods/tools and their effectiveness for skin cancer screening:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 “Skin Cancer (Melanoma) Treatment Program – Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA”.
  2. Koh HK, Norton LA, Geller AC, Sun T, Rigel DS, Miller DR; et al. (1996). “Evaluation of the American Academy of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 34 (6): 971–8. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90274-1. PMID 8647990.
  3. Goldberg MS, Doucette JT, Lim HW, Spencer J, Carucci JA, Rigel DS (2007). “Risk factors for presumptive melanoma in skin cancer screening: American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program experience 2001-2005”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 57 (1): 60–6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.010. PMID 17490783.
  4. Gauwerky K, Ruzicka T, Berking C (2009). “[Skin cancer screening at the family doctor’s office]”. MMW Fortschr Med. 151 (25): 38–42, quiz 43. PMID 19739523.
  5. Treiber N, Huber MA, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Schneider LA (2014). “[Early detection of skin cancer]”. MMW Fortschr Med. 156 (4): 37–40. PMID 24908774.
  6. Mierzwa T, Zegarski W, Placek W, Zegarska B (2004). “[Skin cancer screening program in the population of Bydgoszcz]”. Wiad Lek. 57 Suppl 1: 211–4. PMID 15884241.
  7. Bajaj S, Wolner ZJ, Dusza SW, Braun RP, Marghoob AA, DeFazio J (2019). “Total Body Skin Examination Practices: A Survey Study Amongst Dermatologists at High-Risk Skin Cancer Clinics”. Dermatol Pract Concept. 9 (2): 132–138. doi:10.5826/dpc.0902a09. PMC 6502292 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 31106016.
  8. Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Bakos RM, Bergman W, Blum A; et al. (2012). “Total body skin examination for skin cancer screening in patients with focused symptoms”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 66 (2): 212–9. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.039. PMID 21757257.
  9. “Skin Cancer Screening: MedlinePlus Lab Test Information”.
  10. Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, Sera F, Corona R, Alsina M; et al. (2006). “Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer”. J Clin Oncol. 24 (12): 1877–82. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0864. PMID 16622262.
  11. Menzies SW, Emery J, Staples M, Davies S, McAvoy B, Fletcher J; et al. (2009). “Impact of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging for the management of pigmented lesions in primary care: a sequential intervention trial”. Br J Dermatol. 161 (6): 1270–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09374.x. PMID 19747359.
  12. van der Rhee JI, Bergman W, Kukutsch NA (2010). “The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented lesions in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists: a prospective study”. Br J Dermatol. 162 (3): 563–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09551.x. PMID 19832836.
  13. Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR; et al. (2018). “Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD011902. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011902.pub2. PMC 6517096 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 30521682.
  14. Ferrante di Ruffano L, Takwoingi Y, Dinnes J, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Davenport C; et al. (2018). “Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD013186. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013186. PMC 6517147 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 30521691.
  15. Ferrante di Ruffano L, Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Davenport C; et al. (2018). “Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12: CD013189. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013189. PMID 30521690.
  16. Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, Chelmow D, Coker TR, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Jaén CR, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Rao G, Ruiz JM, Stevermer J, Tsevat J, Underwood SM, Wong JB (April 2023). “Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement”. JAMA. 329 (15): 1290–1295. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.4342. PMID 37071089 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. Henrikson NB, Ivlev I, Blasi PR, Nguyen MB, Senger CA, Perdue LA, Lin JS (April 2023). “Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force”. JAMA. 329 (15): 1296–1307. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.3262. PMID 37071090 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Serge Korjian M.D.; Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Anum Ijaz M.B.B.S., M.D.[2]

Overview

If left untreated, melanoma progression occurs horizontally (radial growth plate) and vertically (vertical growth plate) and is then followed by dermal invasion and distant metastasis. Melanoma is an aggressive tumor characterized by early metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bones, brain, kidneys, lungs, liver and skin (secondary distant site). Complications of melanoma are usually related to the site of metastasis. The 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma is approximately 93%. Features associated with worse prognosis are tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), depth related to skin structures (Clark level), type of melanoma, presence of ulceration, presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion, location of lesion, presence of satellite lesions, and the presence of regional or distant metastasis.

Natural History

Complications

Complications of melanoma are usually due to distant metastasis. Common sites of metastasis are shown below:

Prognosis

Determinants of Prognosis

TNM Staging

Please check the staging page for more details about the staging scheme and the TNM classification.

Breslow’s Depth

  • The Breslow’s depth is independent of other features of the tumor and has been demonstrated to be associated with 5-year survival:
Breslow’s Depth 5-year survival
< 0.76 mm 95% to 100%
0.76-1.5 mm 80% to 96%
1.5-4 mm 60% to 75%
> 4 mm 37% to 50%

Micro-metastasis vs. Macro-metastasis

5-Year Survival

  • When stratified by age, the 5-year relative survival of patients with melanoma was 92.7% and 88.2% for patients <65 and ≥ 65 years of age respectively.[3]
  • When there is distant metastasis, the cancer is generally considered incurable. The five year survival rate is less than 10%.[4]
Stage 5-year relative survival (%), 2004-2010
All stages 91.3%
Localized 98.1%
Regional 62.6%
Distant 16.1%
Unstaged 78.4%
  • Shown below is an image depicting the 5-year conditional relative survival (probability of surviving in the next 5-years given the cohort has already survived 0, 1, 3 years) between 1998 and 2010 of melanoma by stage at diagnosis according to SEER. These graphs are adapted from SEER: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute.[3]

5-year conditional relative survival (probability of surviving in the next 5-years given the cohort has already survived 0, 1, 3 years) between 1998 and 2010 of melanoma by stage at diagnosis according to SEER

  • The 5-year relative survival rate for melanoma of the skin for diagnoses during 2014-2020 was 94% for all races and ethnicities, including White individuals.[5]
  • For Black individuals, the 5-year relative survival rate for melanoma of the skin during 2014-2020 was 70%. [5]

References

  1. Brant JM (November 2013). “Breathlessness with pulmonary metastases: a multimodal approach”. J Adv Pract Oncol. 4 (6): 415–22. PMC 4093448. PMID 25032021.
  2. Homsi J, Kashani-Sabet M, Messina J, Daud A (2005). “Cutaneous melanoma: prognostic factors”. Cancer Control. 12 (4): 223–9. PMID 16258493.Full text (PDF)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z,Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014.
  4. Balch C, Buzaid A, Soong S, Atkins M, Cascinelli N, Coit D, Fleming I, Gershenwald J, Houghton A, Kirkwood J, McMasters K, Mihm M, Morton D, Reintgen D, Ross M, Sober A, Thompson J, Thompson J (2001). “Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma”. J Clin Oncol. 19 (16): 3635–48. PMID 11504745.Full text
  5. 5.0 5.1 Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A (2025). “Cancer statistics, 2025”. CA Cancer J Clin. 75 (1): 10–45. doi:10.3322/caac.21871. PMC 11745215 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 39817679 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Biopsy | Chest X ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

2019 AAD Guidelines for management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma (CM)

2019 AAD Guidelines for management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma (CM)

Guidelines for Diagnosis of Primary CM | Guidelines for Treatment of Primary CM | Guidelines for management of Primary CM in Pregnancy

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:Epithelial neoplasms


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH