Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Pulseless electrical activity

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1],Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maneesha Nandimandalam, M.B.B.S.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: PEA; electromechanical dissociation; EMD; non-perfusing rhythm

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1], Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maneesha Nandimandalam, M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Pulseless electrical activity is defined as the absence of a pulse or cardiac contractility despite the presence of electrocardiographic activity. The most common causes are respiratory failure and hypovolemia, Hypoxia, Hydrogen ions (Acidosis), HypothermiaHyperkalemiaor Hypokalemia, Hypoglycemia, Tablets or Toxins (Drug overdose) such as beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, or calcium channel blockers, Tamponade, Tension pneumothorax, Thrombosis (Myocardial infarction), Thrombosis (Pulmonary embolism), Trauma (Hypovolemia from blood loss), Covid-19. PEA is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly if the underlying cause is not readily identifiable and treated. Absence of palpable pulse is the main finding. Echocardiogram can identify several rapidly reversible causes of PEA such as cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cardiac rupture and underfilling of the ventricle due to hypovolemia. ECG findings shows sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia, with discernible P waves and QRS complexes. Sometimes there is a bradycardia, with or without P waves, and often there is a wide QRS complex. According to the current American Heart Association-Advanced Cardiac Life Support (AHA-ACLS) guidelines CPR is the mainstay of treatment in all patients. Administering 100% oxygen to reverse hypoxia, intubate the patient, establishing IV access should be the priority. The mainstay of drug therapy for PEA is epinephrine 1mg every 3–5 minutes. Immediately after administering epinephrine attention should be directed to reverse any possible causes of PEA as they are the most common causes like hypovolemia (i.e. hypovolemic shock) which should be treated with IV fluidsor packed red blood cell transfusion.

Historical Perspective

Pulseless electrical activity as the main approach for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) was not completely studied until the middle of the 1980’s. The explanation for this, is that ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), were the main causes for the morbidity and mortality of SCA. However there has been a change in approaching the causes of SCA, pointing to PEA as the initial rhythm leading to SCA.

Pathophysiology

PEA( pulseless electrical activity) usually occurs when an insult involves the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal or the respiratory systems. Any such event can lead to decrease in cardiac contractility, and the situation gets even worse by potential acidosis, hypoxia, and worsening vagal tone. A severe initial insult often reduces cardiac output which may in turn cause myocardial ischemia, left ventricular failure, hypoxia and metabolic acidosis. These pathophysiologic disturbances further reduce cardiac output further exacerbating the downward spiral with loss of cardiac output; hypotension, loss of consciousness and apnea rapidly ensue. Other possible mechanisms for pulseless electrical activity include Elevated Afterload, Electromechanical Dissociation, Reduced Contractility, Parasympathetic theory.

Causes

Common causes of PEA include respiratory failure in 40% to 50% of cases, and hypovolemia. Hypovolemia, Hypoxia, Hydrogen ions (Acidosis), HypothermiaHyperkalemiaor Hypokalemia, Hypoglycemia, Tablets or Toxins (Drug overdose) such as beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, or calcium channel blockers, Tamponade, Tension pneumothorax, Thrombosis (Myocardial infarction), Thrombosis (Pulmonary embolism), Trauma (Hypovolemia from blood loss), Covid-19.

Differentiating Pulseless Electrical Activity from Other Diseases

PEA(Pulseless electrical activity) should be differentiated from asystole, ventricular fibrillation, Ventricular flutter, Torsade de Pointes. In asystole, there is cessation of any cardiac activity and lack of cardiac output on this basis. In Ventricular fibrillation there is no organized electrical activity present, while there are only fine fibrillatory waves. Peripheral arterial disease can also present with inability to feel a peripheral pulse so it should be differentiated based on other findings as well.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of SCA ranges between 300,000 to 370,000 cases per year, 50% of which are due to PEA. PEA accounts for approximately 20% of out-hospital cardiac arrests and for a third of the in-hospital cardiac arrests. There is a slight female preponderance for PEA in addition, PEA is associated with increased age and black race.

Risk Factors

The administration of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers is associated with an increased risk of PEA. This may be due to their effect on Ca / troponin interactions, and their inhibition of myocardial contractility.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

PEA is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly if the underlying cause is not readily identifiable and treated. The presence of a QRS interval > 0.20 seconds is associated with a poorer prognosis. The survival of in hospital PEA is only 11.2%. The survival for out of hospital occurrence of PEA is higher (19.5%) than for in hospital PEA, likely due to the higher incidence of reversible causes among patients with out of hospital arrest. The survival of PEA as a presenting rhythm is poorer than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study Of Choice

History and Symptoms

Absence of palpable pulse is the main finding. Depending upon the cause of pulseless electrical activity the following might be found, Tracheal deviation or the unilateral absence of breath sounds in case of tension pneumothorax, decreased skin turgor, Cool extremities, Tachycardia in case of hypotension, traumatic chest, , Cyanosis etc

Echocardiography

A rapid beside echocardiogram can identify several rapidly reversible causes of PEA such as cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cardiac rupture and underfilling of the ventricle due to hypovolemia. Elevated right heart filling pressures suggest pulmonary embolism. Tension pneumothorax can also be observed on a bedside echocardiogram.

Laboratory Findings

Athough there are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with PEA(pulseless electrical activity) testing should be ordered to rule out the most common reversible causes of PEA(pulseless electrical activity) like Hyperkalemia or Hypokalemia, hypoxia and acidosis which can be seen withABG, exsanguination hematocrit.

Electrocardiogram

The appearance of the electrocardiogram in the setting of PEA varies, but several common patterns exist. There may be a normal sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia, with discernible P waves and QRS complexes. Sometimes there is a bradycardia, with or without P waves, and often there is a wide QRS complex. The presence of a QRS interval > 0.20 seconds is associated with a poorer prognosis. The EKG should be carefully evaluated for signs of Hyperkalemia, ST segment elevation MI, hypothermia, QRS interval prolongation suggests tricyclic antidepressant overdose

CT scan

There are no CT scan findings associated with pulseless electrical activity. However it can be used to identify some of the causes of pulseless electrical activity like cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax.Superior vena cava andInferior vena cava enlargement, Hepatic and renal vein enlargment, Periportal edema, Compression of coronary sinus, Angulation of interventricular septum,Pericardial thickening, Collapse of the right atrium, Aortic blood contrast level these are seen in cardiac tamponade CT.

Treatment

Medical therapy

The current American Heart Association-Advanced Cardiac Life Support (AHA-ACLS) guidelines advise the following be undertaken in all patients start CPR immediately, administer 100% oxygen to reverse hypoxia,Intubate the patient, establish IV access.The mainstay of drug therapy for PEA is epinephrine 1mg every 3–5 minutes.Higher doses of epinephrine can be administered in patients with suspected beta blocker and calcium channel blocker overdose.Immediately after administering epinephrine attention should be directed to reverse any possible causes of PEA as they are the most common causes like hypovolemia (i.e. hypovolemic shock) which should be treated with IV fluidsor packed red blood cell transfusion. Others like electrolyte abnormalities including hyper/hypokalemia should be corrected immediately as they can be life threatening as well as tension pneumothorax.

Surgery

External and internal pacing have not been shown to improve outcome and are not recommended. There may be capture of the signals, but there is no improvement in contractility.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

Pulseless electrical activity as the main approach for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) was not completely studied until the middle of the 1980’s. The explanation for this, is that ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), were the main causes for the morbidity and mortality of SCA. However there has been a change in approaching the causes of SCA, pointing to PEA as the initial rhythm leading to SCA.

Historical Perspective

The first approach against trying to decrease mortality due to SCA, was to target tachyarrhythmias, especially ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). This was mainly achieved by the improvements in CPR techniques, the availability of defibrillators to lay responders and the use of implantable cardioverter- defibrillators. Nevertheless, there is and increase in prevalence of PEA and asystolia, which makes them now more frequent than VT and VF. There is still not clear if this can be due to a proportional increase, rather than an absolute increase in cases of PEA. Studies suggest that there is a need to change this approach, because of the increased proportion of PEA cases, and mainly because of the better outcomes for survival in PEA patients, than those with VF/VT [1] [2]. Deeper studies will achieve ultimately a better therapeutic strategy, leading to better patient outcomes and a subsequent impact in overall mortality due to SCA.

There was a workshop created by Myerburg from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [2] as an attempt to record the current knowledge and direct the future research in the field. This workshop also described some of the pathophysiology of PEA, which may translate to improved clinical care.

  • Although the ECG findings of Brugada syndrome were first reported among survivors of cardiac arrest in 1989, it was only in 1992 that the Brugada brothers recognized it as a distinct clinical entity, causing sudden death by causing ventricular fibrillation[3][4]

References

  1. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Dervan C, Uy-Evanado A, Samara M, Mariani R; et al. (2010). “Factors associated with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation: the Oregon sudden unexpected death study”. Circulation. 122 (21): 2116–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966333. PMID 21060069.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM; et al. (2013). “Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop”. Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.
  3. Martini B, Nava A, Thiene G, Buja GF, Canciani B, Scognamiglio R, Daliento L, Dalla Volta S. Ventricular fibrillation without apparent heart disease: description of six cases. Am Heart J 1989 Dec;118(6):1203-9 PMID 2589161
  4. Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Nov 15;20(6):1391-6. PMID 1309182

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

PEA can be classified as cardiac and non cardiac depending on the initial underlying etiology. Cardiac PEA can be further classified as primary and secondary to a preceding ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.[1] Pulseless electrical activity can be classified either by the intensity of cardiac contractions or their electrical manifestations (true or psuedo PEA). There can be found different electrocardiographic patterns in each of the electrical manifestations classification.[2] There is also one type of pulseless electrical activity seen in a post- shock EKG, which should not be classified, and therefore approached as a true PEA.

Classification

EKG Patterns

According to waveform morphology PEA can be classified from a normal QRS width, with isolectric ST and P waves, to waveforms beyond QRS, P and T wave recognition. Waveform analysis has been studied for ultimately predict treatment outcomes, specially regarding ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) as the final goal. In a study made by Dragsund et al in Norway, they mainly studied waveforms for ventricular fibrillation but they hypothesize that the outcome may be similar for PEA. They suggest that PEA waveforms can be categorized quantitatively depending on the rhythm they spontaneously transformed to before they transitioned to either ROSC or asystole.

Classification by Intensity of Cardiac Contractions

True PEA

There are no cardiac contractions despite electrical activity.

Pseudo PEA

There are very weak cardiac contractions present that fail to generate a blood pressure compatible with systemic perfusion and life despite electrical activity. Pseudo PEA is characterized by narrow QRS complexes, short RR intervals, and a faster rate than true PEA. Pseudo PEA has been associated with a better response to treatment compared to true PEA.

Post Defibrillation PEA

Following defibrillation, there can be a period of electromechanical dissociation where electrocardiographic complexes do not generate a pulse. Post defibrillator PEA can result either from myocardial injury or from the termination of the ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.[1] As a result of post defibrillation PEA, it is often useful to continue CPR for up to one minute following restoration of a perfusing rhythm.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM; et al. (2013). “Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop”. Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.
  2. {{Dragsund, I, K Gundersen, M Risdal, J Kramer-Johansen, D Edelson, F Sterz, and T Eftestøl. “Analysing the dynamics of pulseless electrical activity during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.” Computers in cardiology, 2006 17-20 Sept. 2006, [Valencia, Spain. Piscataway, N.J.: IEEE Xplore, 2008. 749 – 752. Print.}}

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

PEA( pulseless electrical activity) usually occurs when an insult involves the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal or the respiratory systems. Any such event can lead to decrease in cardiac contractility, and the situation gets even worse by potential acidosis, hypoxia, and worsening vagal tone. A severe initial insult often reduces cardiac output which may in turn cause myocardial ischemia, left ventricular failure, hypoxia and metabolic acidosis. These pathophysiologic disturbances further reduce cardiac output further exacerbating the downward spiral with loss of cardiac output, hypotension, loss of consciousness and apnea rapidly ensue. Other possible mechanisms for pulseless electrical activity include elevated afterload, electromechanical dissociation, reduced contractility, parasympathetic theory.

Pathophysiology

Pulseless electrical activity is nothing but the loss of cardiac muscle to generate adequate force in response to electrical depolarization. It usually occurs when an insult involves the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal or the respiratory systems. Any such event can lead to decrease in cardiac contractility, and the situation gets even worse by potential acidosis, hypoxia, and worsening vagal tone. The more and more the inotropic state of the cardiac muscle gets compromised it leads to insufficient mechanical activity, despite the presence of electrical activity. It causes degeneration of cardiac rhythm, and eventually, death follows. Respiratory failure leading to hypoxia is one of the most common causes of pulseless electrical activity. The following are other possible mechanisms for pulseless electrical activity:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Reduced Preload and Inadequate Filling Of the Left Ventricle

PEA may be due to inadequate filling of the left ventricle with blood to stretch the cardiac sarcomeres adequately to result in a cardiac contraction (i.e. there is inadequate preload). Examples include rapid fluid or blood loss as occurs in major trauma and ruptured aortic aneurysm. Cardiac tamponade, pneumothorax, and pulmonary embolism are other conditions associated with decreased preload, predisposing to PEA.

Elevated Afterload

Elevated afterload is rarely a cause of PEA.

Electromechanical Dissociation

In some cases, PEA may be caused by electromechanical dissociation. The normal condition when electrical activation of muscle cells precedes mechanical contraction is known as electromechanical coupling. This coupling is lost in some forms of PEA, and this is known as electromechanical dissociation.[8][9][10][11]

Reduced Contractility

Contraction of the myocardium depends upon the integrity of the troponin subunits.

Reduced Calcium Influx

Calcium binding to troponin is required for contractility. This binding can be reduced in calcium channel blocker overdoses.

Reduced Affinity of Troponin for Calcium

In the setting of hypoxia, calcium binds less avidly to troponin.

Parasympathetic Theory

There is a theory suggested by DeBehnke in which a vagotomy was performed after PEA provoked by asphyxia. Vagotomy was performed in randomized canines. All of them were managed first with CPR and chemical cardioversion with epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg every five minutes). He found that ROSC (Return of Spontaneous Circulation) was achieved in 13% of canines with no vagotomy, versus a 75% in those with vagotomy (P = .02). There were also performed hemodynamic and arterial blood gas values at 5, 10 and 15 minutes after ROSC with no significant differences between the 16 canines. 16 canines were induced by asphyxia until PEA presented [12][13].[7].

References

  1. Oliver TI, Sadiq U, Grossman SA. PMID 30020721. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. Saarinen S, Salo A, Boyd J, Laukkanen-Nevala P, Silfvast C, Virkkunen I, Silfvast T (November 2018). “Factors determining level of hospital care and its association with outcome after resuscitation from pre-hospital pulseless electrical activity”. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 26 (1): 98. doi:10.1186/s13049-018-0568-0. PMC 6245922. PMID 30454005.
  3. Weber F, Guha R, Weinberg G, Steinbach F, Gitman M (June 2019). “Prolonged Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest After Intranasal Injection of Lidocaine With Epinephrine: A Case Report”. A A Pract. 12 (11): 438–440. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000000962. PMID 30663992.
  4. Sillers L, Handley SC, James JR, Foglia EE (2019). “Pulseless Electrical Activity Complicating Neonatal Resuscitation”. Neonatology. 115 (2): 95–98. doi:10.1159/000493357. PMID 30352434.
  5. Littmann L, Bustin DJ, Haley MW (2014). “A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity”. Med Princ Pract. 23 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1159/000354195. PMC 5586830. PMID 23949188.
  6. Patil KD, Halperin HR, Becker LB (June 2015). “Cardiac arrest: resuscitation and reperfusion”. Circ. Res. 116 (12): 2041–9. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304495. PMC 5920653. PMID 26044255.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM, Goldhaber JI, Lathrop DA, Liu P, Niemann JT, Ornato JP, Sopko G, Van Eyk JE, Walcott GP, Weisfeldt ML, Wright JD, Zipes DP (December 2013). “Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop”. Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.
  8. Ewy GA (September 1984). “Defining electromechanical dissociation”. Ann Emerg Med. 13 (9 Pt 2): 830–2. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80452-7. PMID 6476549.
  9. Aufderheide TP, Thakur RK, Stueven HA, Aprahamian C, Zhu YR, Fark D, Hargarten K, Olson D (April 1989). “Electrocardiographic characteristics in EMD”. Resuscitation. 17 (2): 183–93. doi:10.1016/0300-9572(89)90070-1. PMID 2546234.
  10. Stueven HA, Aufderheide T, Waite EM, Mateer JR (April 1989). “Electromechanical dissociation: six years prehospital experience”. Resuscitation. 17 (2): 173–82. doi:10.1016/0300-9572(89)90069-5. PMID 2546233.
  11. Stueven HA, Aufderheide T, Thakur RK, Hargarten K, Vanags B (April 1989). “Defining electromechanical dissociation: morphologic presentation”. Resuscitation. 17 (2): 195–203. doi:10.1016/0300-9572(89)90071-3. PMID 2546235.
  12. DeBehnke DJ (1993). “Effects of vagal tone on resuscitation from experimental electromechanical dissociation”. Ann Emerg Med. 22 (12): 1789–94. PMID 8239096.
  13. DeBehnke DJ (1993). “Atropine use in electromechanical dissociation”. Am J Emerg Med. 11 (3): 312. PMID 8489681.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahmoud Sakr, M.D. [2]

Overview

Pulseless electrical activity is defined as the absence of a pulse or cardiac contractility despite the presence of electrocardiographic activity. Pulseless electrical activity is a life-threatening condition and must be treated as such irrespective of the causes. Common causes of PEA include respiratory failure in 40% to 50% of cases, and hypovolemia. Hypovolemia, Hypoxia, Hydrogen ions (Acidosis), HypothermiaHyperkalemiaor Hypokalemia, Hypoglycemia, Tablets or Toxins (Drug overdose) such as beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, or calcium channel blockers, Tamponade, Tension pneumothorax, Thrombosis (Myocardial infarction), Thrombosis (Pulmonary embolism), Trauma (Hypovolemia from blood loss), Covid-19.

Causes

Life Threatening Causes

Pulseless electrical activity is a life-threatening condition and must be treated as such irrespective of the causes. Life-threatening conditions can result in death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated.[1][2]

Common Causes

Common causes of PEA include the following: The common causes of PEA can be remembered using the mnemonic “The Hs and Ts”.[3][4][5][2][6][7]

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular Acute coronary syndrome, aortic aneurysm rupture, Brugada syndrome, cardiac amyloidosis,[8] Cardiac tamponade , cardiac tumor, complete heart block, congenital heart disease, congestive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, long QT syndrome, myocardial infarction, myocarditis, NSTEMI, pericarditis, rheumatic valvular disease,[9] STEMI, valvular heart disease
Chemical/Poisoning Alcohol
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic No underlying causes
Drug Side Effect Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digitalis, methylphenidate,[10] propofol, quinidine, risperidone[11]
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine Diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia
Environmental Hypothermia
Gastroenterologic Bowel necrosis,[12] tension pneumoperitoneum[13]
Genetic Brugada syndrome, congenital heart block, congenital heart disease
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic Cardiac transplantation, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart surgery, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy alcohol septal ablation,[14] postdefibrillation[15]
Infectious Disease Aspiration pneumonia, myocarditis, pericarditis, septic shock
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic No underlying causes
Neurologic Seizure
Nutritional/Metabolic Hypermagnesemia, metabolic acidosis
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic Cardiac tumor
Ophthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose/Toxicity Alcohol,[16] propofol, quinidine
Psychiatric Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
Pulmonary Aspiration pneumonia, bronchospasm, hypoxia, tension pneumothorax
Renal/Electrolyte Hyperkalemia, Hypovolemia, renal failure
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy Cardiac amyloidosis,[8] rheumatic valvular disease, severe anaphylaxis to syntocinon[17]
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma Myocardial contusion, severe brain injury
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous No underlying causes

Causes in Alphabetical Order

References

  1. Shao F, Xu S, Ma X, Xu Z, Lyu J, Ng M, Cui H, Yu C, Zhang Q, Sun P, Tang Z (April 2020). “In-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China”. Resuscitation. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.005. PMC 7151543 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 32283117 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Stueven H, Troiano P, Thompson B, Mateer JR, Kastenson EH, Tonsfeldt D; et al. (1986). “Bystander/first responder CPR: ten years experience in a paramedic system”. Ann Emerg Med. 15 (6): 707–10. PMID 3706861.
  3. ACLS: Principles and Practice. p. 71-87. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2003. ISBN 0-87493-341-2.
  4. ACLS for Experienced Providers. p. 3-5. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2003. ISBN 0-87493-424-9.
  5. “2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care – Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest.” Circulation 2005; 112: IV-58 – IV-66.
  6. Sandberg WS (2005). “Endobronchial blocker dislodgement leading to pulseless electrical activity”. Anesth Analg. 100 (6): 1728–30. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000149895.99151.20. PMID 15920204.
  7. Li H, Liu SM, Yu XH, Tang SL, Tang CK (March 2020). “Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): current status and future perspectives”. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents: 105951. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105951. PMC 7139247 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 32234466 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Hess EP, White RD (2004). “Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: presenting rhythms, management and outcomes in four patients”. Resuscitation. 60 (1): 105–11. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.007. PMID 14987790.
  9. Virkkunen I, Paasio L, Ryynänen S, Vuori A, Sajantila A, Yli-Hankala A; et al. (2008). “Pulseless electrical activity and unsuccessful out-of-hospital resuscitation: what is the cause of death?”. Resuscitation. 77 (2): 207–10. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.12.006. PMID 18249482.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Daly MW, Custer G, McLeay PD (2008). “Cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity associated with methylphenidate in an adolescent with a normal baseline echocardiogram”. Pharmacotherapy. 28 (11): 1408–12. doi:10.1592/phco.28.11.1408. PMID 18957001.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ravin DS, Levenson JW (1997). “Fatal cardiac event following initiation of risperidone therapy”. Ann Pharmacother. 31 (7–8): 867–70. PMID 9220048.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Fang AC, Carnell J, Stein JC (2012). “Constipation in a 7-year-old boy: congenital band causing a strangulated small bowel and pulseless electrical activity”. J Emerg Med. 42 (3): 283–7. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.092. PMID 20832966.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Peppriell JE, Bacon DR (2000). “Acute abdominal compartment syndrome with pulseless electrical activity during colonoscopy with conscious sedation”. J Clin Anesth. 12 (3): 216–9. PMID 10869921.
  14. 14.0 14.1 ten Cate FJ, Soliman OI, Michels M, Theuns DA, de Jong PL, Geleijnse ML, Serruys PW (2010). “Long-term outcome of alcohol septal ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a word of caution”. Circulation. Heart Failure. 3 (3): 362–9. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.862359. PMID 20332420. Retrieved 2012-02-11. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. 15.0 15.1 Geddes LA, Roeder RA, Rundell AE, Otlewski MP, Kemeny AE, Lottes AE (2006). “The natural biochemical changes during ventricular fibrillation with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the onset of postdefibrillation pulseless electrical activity”. Am J Emerg Med. 24 (5): 577–81. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.030. PMID 16938597.
  16. Stueven HA, Aufderheide T, Waite EM, Mateer JR (1989). “Electromechanical dissociation: six years prehospital experience”. Resuscitation. 17 (2): 173–82. PMID 2546233.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Pant D, Vohra VK, Pandey SS, Sood J (2009). “Pulseless electrical activity during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a case report of severe anaphylactic reaction to Syntocinon”. Int J Obstet Anesth. 18 (1): 85–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.09.004. PMID 19111230.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Pulseless Electrical Activity from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1],Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maneesha Nandimandalam, M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

PEA(Pulseless electrical activity) should be differentiated from asystole and ventricular fibrillation, Ventricular flutter, Torsade de Pointes, Asystole etc.

Differentiating Pulseless Electrical Activity from Other Diseases

The table below provides information on the differential diagnosis of pulseless electrical activity in terms of ECG appearance:

Disease Name Causes ECG Characteristics ECG view
Ventricular tachycardia [1][2][3][4][5]
[6]
Ventricular fibrillation [7][8][9][10]
[11]
Ventricular flutter [12][13][14]
[15]
Asystole [16][17]
  • There is no electrical activity in the asystole
[18]
Pulseless electrical activity [19][20][21][22]
[23]
Torsade de Pointes [24][25][26]
  1. Paroxysms of VT with irregular RR intervals.
  2. A ventricular rate between 200 and 250 beats per minute.
  3. Two or more cycles of QRS complexes with alternating polarity.
  4. Changing amplitude of the QRS complexes in each cycle in a sinusoidal fashion.
  5. Prolongation of the QT interval.
  6. Is often initiated by a PVC with a long coupling interval, R on T phenomenon.
  7. There are usually 5 to 20 complexes in each cycle.
[27]

References

  1. Ajijola, Olujimi A.; Tung, Roderick; Shivkumar, Kalyanam (2014). “Ventricular tachycardia in ischemic heart disease substrates”. Indian Heart Journal. 66: S24–S34. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2013.12.039. ISSN 0019-4832.
  2. Meja Lopez, Eliany; Malhotra, Rohit (2019). “Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease”. Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management. 10 (8): 3762–3773. doi:10.19102/icrm.2019.100801. ISSN 2156-3977.
  3. Coughtrie, Abigail L; Behr, Elijah R; Layton, Deborah; Marshall, Vanessa; Camm, A John; Shakir, Saad A W (2017). “Drugs and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia risk: results from the DARE study cohort”. BMJ Open. 7 (10): e016627. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016627. ISSN 2044-6055.
  4. El-Sherif, Nabil (2001). “Mechanism of Ventricular Arrhythmias in the Long QT Syndrome: On Hermeneutics”. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 12 (8): 973–976. doi:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00973.x. ISSN 1045-3873.
  5. de Riva, Marta; Watanabe, Masaya; Zeppenfeld, Katja (2015). “Twelve-Lead ECG of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease”. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 8 (4): 951–962. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002847. ISSN 1941-3149.
  6. ECG found in of https://en.ecgpedia.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
  7. Koplan BA, Stevenson WG (March 2009). “Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 84 (3): 289–97. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61149-X. PMC 2664600. PMID 19252119.
  8. Maury P, Sacher F, Rollin A, Mondoly P, Duparc A, Zeppenfeld K, Hascoet S (May 2017). “Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in tetralogy of Fallot”. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 110 (5): 354–362. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2016.12.006. PMID 28222965.
  9. Saumarez RC, Camm AJ, Panagos A, Gill JS, Stewart JT, de Belder MA, Simpson IA, McKenna WJ (August 1992). “Ventricular fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with increased fractionation of paced right ventricular electrograms”. Circulation. 86 (2): 467–74. doi:10.1161/01.cir.86.2.467. PMID 1638716.
  10. Bektas, Firat; Soyuncu, Secgin (2012). “Hypokalemia-induced Ventricular Fibrillation”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 42 (2): 184–185. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.079. ISSN 0736-4679.
  11. ECG found in https://en.ecgpedia.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
  12. Thies, Karl-Christian; Boos, Karin; Müller-Deile, Kai; Ohrdorf, Wolfgang; Beushausen, Thomas; Townsend, Peter (2000). “Ventricular flutter in a neonate—severe electrolyte imbalance caused by urinary tract infection in the presence of urinary tract malformation”. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 18 (1): 47–50. doi:10.1016/S0736-4679(99)00161-4. ISSN 0736-4679.
  13. Koster, Rudolph W.; Wellens, Hein J.J. (1976). “Quinidine-induced ventricular flutter and fibrillation without digitalis therapy”. The American Journal of Cardiology. 38 (4): 519–523. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(76)90471-9. ISSN 0002-9149.
  14. Dhurandhar RW, Nademanee K, Goldman AM (1978). “Ventricular tachycardia-flutter associated with disopyramide therapy: a report of three cases”. Heart Lung. 7 (5): 783–7. PMID 250503.
  15. ECG found in https://en.ecgpedia.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
  16. ACLS: Principles and Practice. p. 71-87. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2003. ISBN 0-87493-341-2.
  17. ACLS for Experienced Providers. p. 3-5. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2003. ISBN 0-87493-424-9.
  18. ECG found in https://en.ecgpedia.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
  19. “2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care – Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest.” Circulation 2005; 112: IV-58 – IV-66.
  20. Foster B, Twelve Lead Electrocardiography, 2nd edition, 2007
  21. Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM, Goldhaber JI, Lathrop DA, Liu P, Niemann JT, Ornato JP, Sopko G, Van Eyk JE, Walcott GP, Weisfeldt ML, Wright JD, Zipes DP (December 2013). “Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop”. Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.
  22. Littmann L, Bustin DJ, Haley MW (2014). “A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity”. Med Princ Pract. 23 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1159/000354195. PMC 5586830. PMID 23949188.
  23. ECG found in wikimedia Commons
  24. Li M, Ramos LG (July 2017). “Drug-Induced QT Prolongation And Torsades de Pointes”. P T. 42 (7): 473–477. PMC 5481298. PMID 28674475.
  25. Sharain, Korosh; May, Adam M.; Gersh, Bernard J. (2015). “Chronic Alcoholism and the Danger of Profound Hypomagnesemia”. The American Journal of Medicine. 128 (12): e17–e18. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.051. ISSN 0002-9343.
  26. Khan IA (2001). “Twelve-lead electrocardiogram of torsades de pointes”. Tex Heart Inst J. 28 (1): 69. PMC 101137. PMID 11330748.
  27. ECG found in https://en.ecgpedia.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

Over the last three decades, the incidence of PEA has increased in parallel to a decrease in the incidence of VF and VT.[1] There is a slight female preponderance of PEA. In addition, PEA is associated with increased age and black race.[2][3]

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • The incidence of SCA ranges between 300,000 to 370,000 cases per year, 50% of which are due to PEA.[1][4]
  • PEA accounts for approximately 20% of out-hospital cardiac arrests and for a third of the in-hospital cardiac arrests.[5] PEA is responsible for 10% of in-hospital deaths.[6]
  • The decrease in the prevalence of VF and VT has been accompanied by a parallel relative increase in the incidence of PEA among patients with SCA.[1] In fact, following adequate management of VF and VT, the prevalence of VT/VF has dropped by 20% while the prevalence of PEA increased by 11% between 1979 and 2000.[7]
  • There is a slight female preponderance of PEA. In addition, PEA is associated with increased age and black race.[2][3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM; et al. (2013). “Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop”. Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Becker LB, Han BH, Meyer PM, Wright FA, Rhodes KV, Smith DW; et al. (1993). “Racial differences in the incidence of cardiac arrest and subsequent survival. The CPR Chicago Project”. N Engl J Med. 329 (9): 600–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM199308263290902. PMID 8341333.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Chu K, Swor R, Jackson R, Domeier R, Sadler E, Basse E; et al. (1998). “Race and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a suburban community”. Ann Emerg Med. 31 (4): 478–82. PMID 9546017.
  4. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Ayala J, Mariani R, Wittwer L, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS (September 2012). “Survival advantage from ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity in women compared to men: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study”. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 34 (3): 219–25. doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9669-2. PMC 3627722. PMID 22406930.
  5. Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, Carey SM, Kaye W, Mancini ME, Nichol G, Lane-Truitt T, Potts J, Ornato JP, Berg RA (2006). “First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults”. JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association. 295 (1): 50–7. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.50. PMID 16391216. Retrieved 2012-09-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. Raizes G, Wagner GS, Hackel DB (1977). “Instantaneous nonarrhythmic cardiac death in acute myocardial infarction”. The American Journal of Cardiology. 39 (1): 1–6. PMID 831417. Retrieved 2012-09-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  7. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Dervan C, Uy-Evanado A, Samara M, Mariani R; et al. (2010). “Factors associated with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation: the Oregon sudden unexpected death study”. Circulation. 122 (21): 2116–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966333. PMID 21060069.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

The administration of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers is associated with an increased risk of PEA. This may be due to their effect on the interactions between calcium and troponin and their inhibition of myocardial contractility. Syncope and pulmonary disease is also associated with a higher risk of PEA.

Risk Factors

The following are the major common risk factors for the PEA(pulseless electrical activity):[1] [2][3][1] [2][4] [5][6][7][8][6]


Beta Blockers and Calcium Channel Blockers as Risk Factors for PEA

It is not yet well established why beta blockers and ACE inhibitors are risk factors for PEA. One possible explanation is that the use of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors in the context of ventricular fibrillation might lead to the conversion of ventricular fibrillation (VF) to pulseless electrical activity (PEA).[9] Another explanation for the association is that the pharmacological treatment with beta blockers and ACE inhibitors of patients with VF have lead to a decrease in the prevalence of VF and subsequent relative increase in the incidence of PEA among patients with SCA.[10] [11]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Becker LB, Han BH, Meyer PM, Wright FA, Rhodes KV, Smith DW; et al. (1993). “Racial differences in the incidence of cardiac arrest and subsequent survival. The CPR Chicago Project”. N Engl J Med. 329 (9): 600–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM199308263290902. PMID 8341333.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Chu K, Swor R, Jackson R, Domeier R, Sadler E, Basse E; et al. (1998). “Race and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a suburban community”. Ann Emerg Med. 31 (4): 478–82. PMID 9546017.
  3. Jayaraman R, Reinier K, Nair S, Aro AL, Uy-Evanado A, Rusinaru C, Stecker EC, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS (April 2018). “Risk Factors of Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young: Multiple-Year Community-Wide Assessment”. Circulation. 137 (15): 1561–1570. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031262. PMC 5918307. PMID 29269388.
  4. Pirolo JS, Hutchins GM, Moore GW (1985). “Electromechanical dissociation: pathologic explanations in 50 patients”. Hum Pathol. 16 (5): 485–7. PMID 3988275.
  5. Herlitz J, Rosenfelt M, Bång A, Axelsson A, Ekström L, Wennerblom B; et al. (1996). “Prognosis among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest judged as being caused by deterioration of obstructive pulmonary disease”. Resuscitation. 32 (3): 177–84. PMID 8923578.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Dervan C, Uy-Evanado A, Samara M, Mariani R; et al. (2010). “Factors associated with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation: the Oregon sudden unexpected death study”. Circulation. 122 (21): 2116–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966333. PMID 21060069.
  7. Allan KS, Morrison LJ, Pinter A, Tu JV, Dorian P (January 2019). “Unexpected High Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Psychiatric Disease Among Young People With Sudden Cardiac Arrest”. J Am Heart Assoc. 8 (2): e010330. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010330. PMC 6497342. PMID 30661423.
  8. Sadeghi R, Adnani N, Sohrabi MR, Alipour Parsa S (September 2013). “Risk of sudden cardiac death”. ARYA Atheroscler. 9 (5): 274–9. PMC 3845694. PMID 24302935.
  9. Gessman LJ (2009). “Do beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors decrease the duration of ventricular fibrillation, or cause spontaneous conversion of ventricular fibrillation?”. Crit Care Med. 37 (1): 329–30. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181930578. PMID 19112286.
  10. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Copass MK (2002). “Changing incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, 1980-2000”. JAMA. 288 (23): 3008–13. PMID 12479765.
  11. Herlitz J, Andersson E, Bång A, Engdahl J, Holmberg M, lindqvist J; et al. (2000). “Experiences from treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 17 years in Göteborg”. Eur Heart J. 21 (15): 1251–8. doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2150. PMID 10924315.

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

PEA is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly if the underlying cause is not readily identified and treated. The presence of a QRS interval > 0.20 seconds is associated with a poorer prognosis. The survival of patients with PEA as a presenting rhythm for sudden cardiac arrest is poorer than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.[1]

Natural History

  • The symptoms of (disease name) usually develop in the first/ second/ third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as ___.
  • The symptoms of (disease name) typically develop ___ years after exposure to ___.
  • If left untreated, [#]% of patients with [disease name] may progress to develop [manifestation 1], [manifestation 2], and [manifestation 3].

Complications

  • Common complications of [disease name] include:
    • [Complication 1]
    • [Complication 2]
    • [Complication 3]

Prognosis

  • Prognosis is generally poor, and the 1/5/10-year mortality/survival rate of patients with [disease name] is approximately [–]%.
  • Depending on the extent of the [tumor/disease progression] at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor/good/excellent.
  • The presence of [characteristic of disease] is associated with a particularly [good/poor] prognosis among patients with [disease/malignancy].
  • The prognosis varies with the [characteristic] of tumor; [subtype of disease/malignancy] have the most favorable prognosis.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

  • The survival of patients with out of hospital occurrence of PEA is 19.5% compared to 11.2% among patients with in hospital PEA, likely due to the higher incidence of reversible causes among patients with out of hospital arrest.[1][2][3]
  • Among 11,963 patients with PEA, only 11% survived, 62% of which had good neurological outcomes.[4]
  • According to the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, the survival of patients with SCA during hospitalization is 8% among subjects with PEA compared to 30.5% for subjects with VT or VF; therefore, strategies for improving survival after PEA due to SCA should be implemented.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Meaney PA, Nadkarni VM, Kern KB, Indik JH, Halperin HR, Berg RA (2010). “Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest”. Critical Care Medicine. 38 (1): 101–8. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b43282. PMID 19770741. Retrieved 2012-09-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Thomas AJ, Newgard CD, Fu R, Zive DM, Daya MR (September 2013). “Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms”. Resuscitation. 84 (9): 1261–6. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.016. PMC 3947599. PMID 23454257.
  3. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Ayala J, Mariani R, Wittwer L, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS (September 2012). “Survival advantage from ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity in women compared to men: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study”. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 34 (3): 219–25. doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9669-2. PMC 3627722. PMID 22406930.
  4. Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, Carey SM, Kaye W, Mancini ME; et al. (2006). “First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults”. JAMA. 295 (1): 50–7. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.50. PMID 16391216.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Chest X Ray | Echocardiography

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters

de:Elektromechanische Entkoppelung


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH