Whipple's disease
For patient information, click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Synonyms and keywords: Intestinal lipodystrophy; Whipple disease
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple’s disease is a rare, systemic infectious disease caused by the bacterium Tropheryma whipplei. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. Following contamination, based on immunologic response, patient might present with different manifestations including acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Whipple’s disease primarily causes malabsorption but may affect any part of the body including the heart, lungs, brain, joints, and eyes. Diagnostic findings of Whipple’s disease include PAS positive inclusions in macrophages of lamina propria. Endoscopy and small bowel biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease. Antimicrobial therapy is the mainstay of therapy for Whipple’s disease.
Historical Perspective
Whipple described the disease for the first time in 1907 as a gastrointestinal disorder and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy.” Light and electron microscopy on small bowel biopsy were used to detect bacilli inside the intestinal mucosa. In 1952, systemic antibiotics were used to treat the disease which confirmed the infective nature of the disease. It took almost 100 years for investigators to cultivate the bacterium and sequenced the genome.
Classification
Whipple’s disease may be classified into two groups of acute and chronic infection. It might be classified as systemic or localized based on the organ involvement. It has four different clinical manifestations: Acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.
Pathophysiology
Whipple’s disease is a rare systemic disease. Therefore, some aspects of pathogenesis have remained unclear. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, genetic and immunologic factors play important roles in clinical manifestation of Tropheryma whipplei infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. There is a decreased activity of the T helper cells type 1 and increased activity of the T helper cells type 2. Defective phagocytic system is responsible for replication of bacteria in macrophages and spread of bacteria to other tissues. Characteristic of Whipple’s disease is presence of foamy macrophages in the lamina propria that is periodic acid-Schiff stain positive.
Causes
Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium and the causative organism of Whipple’s disease. While Tropheryma whipplei is categorized with the gram-positive Actinobacteria, the organism is commonly found to be gram-negative or gram-indeterminate when stained in the laboratory. Whipple himself probably observed the organisms as rod-shaped structures with silver stain in his original case, but no name was given to the organism until 1991 when the name Tropheryma whippelii was proposed after sections of the bacterial genome were sequenced. The name was changed to Tropheryma whipplei in 2001 (correcting the spelling of Whipple’s name) after deposition in bacterial collections.
Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases
Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain, multisystem involvement, such as celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease and systemic infections.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Whipple’s disease is a systemic disease among middle-aged white males in North America and western Europe. It affects males 8 times more than females. Few studies were done to evaluate the demographics of Whipple’s disease due to the sparsity of the disease. The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals and the prevalence is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy. Although the prevalence of carrier state is higher in Asian and African countries, the prevalence of the classic Whipple’s disease is less than American and western European countries. The case-fatality rate of Whipple’s disease is approximately 100%, if left untreated. The case-fatality rate of treated Whipple’s disease is unknown.
Risk Factors
Common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease may be environmental, genetic, and immunologic. The most important risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets. Defective cellular immunity is the less common risk factor.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Acute infection might present with gastroenteritis, pneumonia or bacteremia. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. Classic Whipple’s disease has 3 clinical phases that starts with nonspecific symptoms and joint pain. It progresses to gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, steatorrhea, malabsorption, and weight loss. in the late phase, all the other organs including CNS, joints, eyes, heart, lung, liver and skin might be involved. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality.
Complications
Common complications of Whipple’s disease include malnutrition, cardiopulmonary, neurologic and osteoarticular involvement. Malabsorption mostly presents with fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, fatigue, and weight loss. Valvular heart disease and dementia are the most common cardiac and neurologic complication, respectively.
Prognosis
The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment with antibiotics started early. Without treatment, whipple’s disease is fatal.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Criteria
There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease.
History and Symptoms
Patients with Whipple’s disease have various presentations. Most common symptoms of the classic Whipple’s disease include joint pain, weight loss, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Other organ systems can be involved in Whipple’s disease including central nervous system, cardiac system, renal system, skeletal, muscles and pulmonary system.
Physical Examination
Patients with Whipple’s disease usually appear weak. Physical examination of patients with Whipple’s disease is usually remarkable for weight loss and signs of vitamin deficiency. Further physical findings depend on the systems involved in the disease. Abnormal eye movements including oculomasticatory myorhythmia, or oculofacial-skeletal myorhythmia are pathognomonic for the Whipple’s disease.
Laboratory Findings
Some patients with Whipple’s disease may have abnormal hematological findings and elevated acute phase reactants, which is suggestive of the infection. Laboratory evidence of malabsorption including hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia may be seen.
Imaging Findings
The imaging findings associated with Whipple’s disease depend on the system involved. These findings are not diagnostic. In patients with pulmonary involvement, chest imaging including x-ray or CT scan may demonstrate pulmonary infiltrates, pleural effusion, nodular pattern, small lung volumes, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy.
Abdominal CT scan may show thickening of small bowel folds and enlarged abdominal lymph nodes.
Head CT scan may show generalized cerebral atrophy or focal lesions including small granulomas in the gray matter of the cerebral and cerebellar cortex or microinfarctions.
Other Diagnostic Studies
Endoscopy and small bowel biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease. Diagnostic findings of Whipple’s disease include, PAS positive inclusions in macrophages of lamina propria. Other diagnostic studies for Whipple’s disease include electron microscopy which demonstrate bacteria, immunofluorescent assay to detect antibodies against Tropheryma whipplei and PCR, which demonstrates 16S rRNA gene of Tropheryma whipplei.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Antimicrobial therapy is the mainstay of therapy for Whipple’s disease. Intravenous ceftriaxone or penicillin G is indicated in the acute phase of Whipple’s therapy. For maintenance therapy, patients are typically treated with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for at least 1 year. Patients who experience either Whipple’s disease or allergy to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim require a combination of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine. Dietary supplements including vitamins, iron, folic acid, calcium and magnesium is needed. Following antibiotic therapy, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) might occur that requires oral corticosteroid. Lifelong follow-up is needed to detect relapse.
Surgery
The mainstay of treatment for Whipple’s disease is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with cardiac complications and heart valves involvement.
Primary Prevention
There are no established measures for the primary prevention of Whipple’s disease. However, general measurement including proper sanitation decreases the risk of infection with Tropheryma whipplei.
Secondary Prevention
There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of Whipple’s disease.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple described the disease for the first time in 1907 as a gastrointestinal disorder and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy.” Light and electron microscopy on small bowel biopsy were used to detect bacilli inside the intestinal mucosa. In 1952, systemic antibiotics were used to treat the disease which confirmed the infective nature of the disease. It took almost 100 years for investigators to cultivate the bacterium and sequenced the genome.
Historical Perspective
- In 1907, George Hoyt Whipple described a case who died after a course of gastrointestinal, malabsorption, pulmonary, neurologic and constitutional symptoms. Pathology showed rod-like bacilli in the lamina propria and fat deposition in intestinal and mesenteric lymph nodes. He named this disease as “intestinal lipodystrophy.”[1]
- In 1947, Oliver-Pascual reported a case of “intestinal lipodystrophy” before the death of a patient.[2]
- In 1949, Black-Schaffer used periodic acid-Schiff for staining the bacilli. Also, “Intestinal lipodystrophy” was renamed to “Whipple’s disease.”[3]
- In 1952, Pauley treated a patient successfully by using systemic antibiotics, prolonged period of chloramphenicol.[4]
- In 1958, Bolt reported the use of the small bowel biopsy to differentiate malabsorption diseases and confirm the Whipple’s disease.[5]
- In 1961, Chears and Ashworth used electron microscopy and cytochemical study to detect the bacilli inside the intestinal macrophages.[6] In that year, another team, Yardley and Hendrix demonstrated the rod-shaped structures in the intestinal mucosa by combined electron and light microscopy.[7]
- In 1991, Wilson was able to partially sequence a 16S rRNA of a new bacterium. They classified this bacterium within the Actinomycetes clade.[8]
- In 1992, Relman confirmed the previous result and extended the 16S rRNA sequence by using PCR. They used the term of “Tropheryma whippleii” for the first time for this bacterium.[9]
- In 2000, Raoult reported isolation and cultivation of the bacterium responsible for the Whipple’s disease. They obtained the tissue from the mitral valve of a patient with a culture negative endocarditis.[10]
- In 2001, La Scola isolated Whipple’s disease bacillus from the cardiac valve of a patient with endocarditis and characterized it phenotypically. They slightly changed the name to “Tropheryma whipplei.”[11]
- In 2003, Bentley and Raoult analyzed and sequenced the genome of two different strains of Tropheryma whipplei.[12][13]
| Year | Investigator | Landmark event |
|---|---|---|
| 1907 | George Hoyt Whipple | Described the Whipple’s disease for the first time and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy“. |
| 1947 | Oliver-Pascual | Reported a case of “intestinal lipodystrophy” before the death of a patient. |
| 1949 | Black-Schaffer | Strained the bacilli with periodic acid-Schiff stain; renamed to “Whipple’s disease.” |
| 1952 | Pauley | Successfully used systemic antibiotics for treatment of the “Whipple’s disease.” |
| 1958 | Bolt | Used small bowel biopsy to differentiate malabsorption diseases and confirm the Whipple’s disease. |
| 1961 | Chears and Ashworth | Used electron microscopy and cytochemical study to detect the bacilli inside the intestinal macrophages. |
| 1961 | Yardley and Hendrix | Used combined electron and light microscopy to detect the rod-shaped structures in the intestinal mucosa. |
| 1991 | Wilson | Sequenced a 16S rRNA of a new bacterium partially and classified it within the Actinomycetes clade. |
| 1992 | Relman | Confirmed the previous result and extended the 16S rRNA sequence by using PCR; named the bacterium “Tropheryma whippleii” for the first time. |
| 2000 | Raoult | Reported isolation and cultivation of “Tropheryma whippleii” for the first time. |
| 2001 | La Scola | Characterized the bacterium phenotypically; slightly renamed it to “Tropheryma whipplei.” |
| 2003 | Bentley
Raoult |
Analyzed and sequenced the genome of two different strains of Tropheryma whipplei. |
Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies
- In 1952, Pauley treated a Whipple’s disease successfully by using systemic antibiotics, prolonged period of chloramphenicol.[4]
References
- ↑ Whipple G H. A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and mesenteric lymphatic tissues. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1907;198:383.
- ↑ OLIVER-PASCUAL E, GALAN J (1947). “[Not Available]”. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig Nutr (in Undetermined). 6 (3): 213–26. PMID 20251637.
- ↑ BLACK-SCHAFFER B (1949). “The tinctoral demonstration of a glycoprotein in Whipple’s disease”. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 72 (1): 225–7. PMID 15391722.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 PAULLEY JW (1952). “A case of Whipple’s disease (intestinal lipodystrophy)”. Gastroenterology. 22 (1): 128–33. PMID 12980233.
- ↑ Bolt, Robert J.; Pollard, H. Marvin; Standaert, Ludovic (1958). “Transoral Small-Bowel Biopsy as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Malabsorption States”. New England Journal of Medicine. 259 (1): 32–34. doi:10.1056/NEJM195807032590107. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ CHEARS WC, ASHWORTH CT (1961). “Electron microscopic study of the intestinal mucosa in Whipple’s disease. Demonstration of encapsulated bacilliform bodies in the lesion”. Gastroenterology. 41: 129–38. PMID 13692693.
- ↑ YARDLEY JH, HENDRIX TR (1961). “Combined electron and light microscopy in Whipple’s disease. Demonstration of “bacillary bodies” in the intestine”. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 109: 80–98. PMID 13787237.
- ↑ Wilson KH, Blitchington R, Frothingham R, Wilson JA (1991). “Phylogeny of the Whipple’s-disease-associated bacterium”. Lancet. 338 (8765): 474–5. PMID 1714530.
- ↑ Relman, David A.; Schmidt, Thomas M.; MacDermott, Richard P.; Falkow, Stanley (1992). “Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (5): 293–301. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207303270501. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ Raoult, Didier; Birg, Marie L.; Scola, Bernard La; Fournier, Pierre E.; Enea, Maryse; Lepidi, Hubert; Roux, Veronique; Piette, Jean-Charles; Vandenesch, François; Vital-Durand, Denis; Marrie, Tom J. (2000). “Cultivation of the Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 342 (9): 620–625. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003023420903. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ La Scola, B; Altwegg, M; Mallet, M N; Fournier, P E; Fenollar, F; Raoult, D (2001). “Description of Tropheryma whipplei gen. nov., sp. nov., the Whipple’s disease bacillus”. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 51 (4): 1471–1479. doi:10.1099/00207713-51-4-1471. ISSN 1466-5026.
- ↑ Bentley, Stephen D; Maiwald, Matthias; Murphy, Lee D; Pallen, Mark J; Yeats, Corin A; Dover, Lynn G; Norbertczak, Halina T; Besra, Gurdyal S; Quail, Michael A; Harris, David E; von Herbay, Axel; Goble, Arlette; Rutter, Simon; Squares, Robert; Squares, Stephen; Barrell, Bart G; Parkhill, Julian; Relman, David A (2003). “Sequencing and analysis of the genome of the Whipple’s disease bacterium Tropheryma whipplei”. The Lancet. 361 (9358): 637–644. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12597-4. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ Raoult D, Ogata H, Audic S, Robert C, Suhre K, Drancourt M, Claverie JM (2003). “Tropheryma whipplei Twist: a human pathogenic Actinobacteria with a reduced genome”. Genome Res. 13 (8): 1800–9. doi:10.1101/gr.1474603. PMC 403771. PMID 12902375.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple’s disease may be classified into two groups of acute and chronic infection. It might be classified as systemic or localized based on the organ involvement. It has four different clinical manifestations: Acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.
Classification
Whipple’s disease classification based on the duration:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Whipple’s disease may be classified to two groups of systemic and localized infection based on organ involvement.[3]
Whipple’s disease classification based on organ involvement:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Tropheryma whipplei infection may be classified to four groups based on the clinical manifestation:[1][4][5][6]
- Acute infections such as:
- Asymptomatic carrier state
- The classic Whipple’s disease
- Localized involvement of different organs including:
- Heart:
- Blood-culture negative endocarditis
- Adhesive pericarditis
- Myocardial fibrosis
- CNS:
- Eyes:
- Uveitis
- Vitritis
- Retinitis
- Retrobulbar neuritis
- Papilledema
- Lung:
- Bone:
- Serosa:
- Skin:
- Heart:
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Marth, Thomas (2009). “New Insights into Whipple’s Disease – A Rare Intestinal Inflammatory Disorder”. Digestive Diseases. 27 (4): 494–501. doi:10.1159/000233288. ISSN 1421-9875.
- ↑ Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
- ↑ Relman, David A.; Schmidt, Thomas M.; MacDermott, Richard P.; Falkow, Stanley (1992). “Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (5): 293–301. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207303270501. ISSN 0028-4793.
- ↑ Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ Ectors N, Geboes K, De Vos R, Heidbuchel H, Rutgeerts P, Desmet V, Vantrappen G (1992). “Whipple’s disease: a histological, immunocytochemical and electronmicroscopic study of the immune response in the small intestinal mucosa”. Histopathology. 21 (1): 1–12. PMID 1378814.
- ↑ Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple’s disease is a rare systemic disease. Therefore, some aspects of pathogenesis have remained unclear. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, genetic and immunologic factors play important roles in clinical manifestation of Tropheryma whipplei infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. There is a decreased activity of the T helper cells type 1 and increased activity of the T helper cells type 2. Defective phagocytic system is responsible for replication of bacteria in macrophages and spread of bacteria to other tissues. Characteristic of Whipple’s disease is presence of foamy macrophages in the lamina propria that is periodic acid-Schiff stain positive.
Pathophysiology
Pathogenesis
- Whipple’s disease is a rare bacterial systemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei.[1]
- Tropheryma whipplei is a periodic acid-Schiff stain positive, gram-positive bacillus of Actinomycetes family.[2]
- The bacterium lives in soil and wastewater. Farmers and everyone who has any contact with contaminated soil and water are at high risk of the infection.[3]
- It is transmitted through oro-oral and feco-oral routes. The poor sanitation is associated with Tropheryma whipplei infection.[4]
- It is believed that human being is the only host for this bacterium.[5]
- Tropheryma whipplei invades intestines primarily and then every other organ including the heart, CNS, joints, lymph nodes, lungs, eyes, kidneys, bone marrow, and skin. Tissues are infected by macrophage infiltration contaminated by Tropheryma whipplei. Tropheryma whipplei multiplies in macrophages and monocytes.[6] Although there is a massive infiltration of the intestinal mucosa with the bacteria, the immunologic response is not adequate to limit the infection. Bacterium-infected macrophages express less CD11b which leads to inappropriate antigen presentation. These macrophages are unable to turn into mature phagosomes and lower the thioredoxin expression. The impairment in T-helper 1 cells differentiation leads to the inability of the immune system to kill the bacteria.[7][8]
- Tropheryma whipplei infection causes four different clinical manifestations: acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.[9][10]
| Contamination via oro-oral or feco-oral route | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acute infection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antibody production | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strong immune response | Insufficient immune response | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Complete eradication | Chronic carrier | Chronic infection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Classic Whipple’s disease | Localized infection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cure | Relapse | Re-infection | Death | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Immunologic response
- It is believed that host immunologic response to Tropheryma whipplei plays an important role on the clinical manifestation of the disease.[6]
- Several studies suggested that the defective cellular immunity and humoral immunity may lead to the proliferation of the bacteria and clinical manifestation of the Whipple’s disease.[8]
Followings are some of the observations that indicate the immunologic nature of the Whipple’s disease:
Defective cellular immunity
- Reduced T cell proliferative response[8]
- Decreased CD4/CD8 ratio[11]
- Decreased T helper cells type 1 response and subsequently reduced production of interleukin 2 (IL-2)
- Enhanced expression of interleukin 4 (IL-4) and functional activity of T helper cells type 2 (Th2)[12]
- Increased numbers of regulatory T cells[13]
- Reduced peripheral T cell proliferation to phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A[8]
- Up-regulated Interleukin 16 (IL-16) in monocyte-derived macrophages that enhanced Tropheryma whipplei replication[14]
Defective macrophagic/phagocytic system
- Reduced Interleukin 12 (IL-12) production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells that leads to decreased functional activity of T helper cells type 1 (Th1) and subsequently decreased Interferon gamma secretion by peripheral blood mononuclear cells[15][16][12]
- Reduced expression of complement receptor 3 (CD11b)[8]
- Normal phagocytosis but impaired degradation[15]
Defective humoral immunity
- Increased Immunoglobulin M production in the lamina propria[11]
- Reduced Serum Immunoglobulin G2, an Interferon gamma dependent immunoglobulin subclass, and serum TGF-beta levels[15]
Genetics
There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, there is an association between Whipple’s disease and some immunologic defects.
- Studies showed that individuals with specific HLA type (HLA alleles DRB1*13 and DQB1*06) have a higher risk of Whipple’s disease.[9]
Associated Conditions
The most important conditions associated with Whipple’s disease include:
- HLA-B27 individuals
- Defective cellular immunity
- HIV infection
Gross Pathology
- On endoscopy, pale yellow mucosa with whitish spots, greenish brown and erythematous patches, and both engorged and flattened folds are characteristic findings of Whipple’s disease.[17]
Microscopic Pathology
- On microscopic histopathological analysis, PAS-positive macrophages in the lamina propria containing non-acid-fast gram-positive bacilli are characteristic findings of Whipple’s disease.[17][18]
Below images show the characteristic feature of Whipple’s disease: foamy macrophages are present in the lamina propria.[19]
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
References
- ↑ Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. Lancet Infect Dis. 8 (3): 179–90. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. PMID 18291339.
- ↑ Schwartzman, Sergio; Schwartzman, Monica (2013). “Whipple’s Disease”. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 39 (2): 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2013.03.005. ISSN 0889-857X.
- ↑ Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Diatta, Georges; Ratmanov, Pavel; Bassene, Hubert; Raoult, Didier; Roucher, Clémentine; Fenollar, Florence; Sokhna, Cheikh; Tall, Adama; Trape, Jean-François; Mediannikov, Oleg (2013). “Looking for Tropheryma whipplei Source and Reservoir in Rural Senegal”. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 88 (2): 339–343. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0614. ISSN 0002-9637.
- ↑ Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Brouqui, Philippe; Badiaga, Sékéné; Benkouiten, Samir; Ratmanov, Pavel; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 17 (1): e67–e68. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1033. ISSN 1201-9712.
- ↑ Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.
- ↑ Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Marth T, Roux M, von Herbay A, Meuer SC, Feurle GE (1994). “Persistent reduction of complement receptor 3 alpha-chain expressing mononuclear blood cells and transient inhibitory serum factors in Whipple’s disease”. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 72 (2): 217–26. PMID 7519533.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Marth, Thomas (2009). “New Insights into Whipple’s Disease – A Rare Intestinal Inflammatory Disorder”. Digestive Diseases. 27 (4): 494–501. doi:10.1159/000233288. ISSN 1421-9875.
- ↑ Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Ectors N, Geboes K, De Vos R, Heidbuchel H, Rutgeerts P, Desmet V, Vantrappen G (1992). “Whipple’s disease: a histological, immunocytochemical and electronmicroscopic study of the immune response in the small intestinal mucosa”. Histopathology. 21 (1): 1–12. PMID 1378814.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Marth T, Kleen N, Stallmach A, Ring S, Aziz S, Schmidt C, Strober W, Zeitz M, Schneider T (2002). “Dysregulated peripheral and mucosal Th1/Th2 response in Whipple’s disease”. Gastroenterology. 123 (5): 1468–77. PMID 12404221.
- ↑ Schinnerling K, Moos V, Geelhaar A, Allers K, Loddenkemper C, Friebel J, Conrad K, Kühl AA, Erben U, Schneider T (2011). “Regulatory T cells in patients with Whipple’s disease”. J. Immunol. 187 (8): 4061–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1101349. PMID 21918190.
- ↑ Desnues B, Raoult D, Mege JL (2005). “IL-16 is critical for Tropheryma whipplei replication in Whipple’s disease”. J. Immunol. 175 (7): 4575–82. PMID 16177102.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Marth T, Neurath M, Cuccherini BA, Strober W (1997). “Defects of monocyte interleukin 12 production and humoral immunity in Whipple’s disease”. Gastroenterology. 113 (2): 442–8. PMID 9247462.
- ↑ Schneider T, Stallmach A, von Herbay A, Marth T, Strober W, Zeitz M (1998). “Treatment of refractory Whipple disease with interferon-gamma”. Ann. Intern. Med. 129 (11): 875–7. PMID 9867729.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Salkic, Nermin N.; Alibegovic, Ervin; Jovanovic, Predrag (2013). “Endoscopic appearance of duodenal mucosa in Whipple’s disease”. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 77 (5): 822–823. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.016. ISSN 0016-5107.
- ↑ Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
- ↑ https://commons.wikimedia.org
- ↑ “File:Whipples Disease, PAS (6881958655).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipples Disease, GMS (6881505399).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipple disease -a- high mag.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipples Disease, PAS (6881958605).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipple disease.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipple2.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”. External link in
|title=(help) - ↑ “File:Whipple pas+.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
- ↑ “File:Whipples Disease, Kinyoun Carbolfuchsin Acid-Fast Stain (6881505345).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium and the causative organism of Whipple’s disease. While Tropheryma whipplei is categorized with the gram-positive Actinobacteria, the organism is commonly found to be gram-negative or gram-indeterminate when stained in the laboratory. Whipple himself probably observed the organisms as rod-shaped structures with silver stain in his original case, but no name was given to the organism until 1991 when the name Tropheryma whippelii was proposed after sections of the bacterial genome were sequenced. The name was changed to Tropheryma whipplei in 2001 (correcting the spelling of Whipple’s name) after deposition in bacterial collections.
Description
Tropheryma whipplei is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium. It was finally isolated in eukaryotic cells in the year 2000 and propagated in a culture at 37 degrees Celsius, but was believed to resist culturing for a long time. In fact, it still can only be cultured if part of its eukaryotic host is present. The isolation from human cells and the culturing has allowed more characterization, including sequencing its genome that has resulted in 808 predicted protein-coding gene sequences, even though it grows at a very slow rate of about 4 to 17 days.[1][2]
It is mesophilic, meaning it grows best at moderate temperatures ranging between 25 and 40 degrees Celsius. Its optimal temperature is 37 degrees Celsius. However, Tropheryma whipplei has a special ability as even though it is not affected by heat shock, it can modify its transcriptome following cold shock at a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius; this proves that although it lacks a lot of typical regulatory elements, it still has a highly adaptive response to thermal stresses that would be typical with its potential environmental origin being that of something probably at lower temperatures (something still being studied), thereby allowing it to live and adapt in cold conditions.[1][2]
Structure
Genome structure
Tropheryma whipplei has a 0.92 Mb genome, placing it in a high-GC-content gram-positive bacterial group.[2] It is the only known human pathogen with a reduced genome sequence within the class of Actinobacteria. This means that this pathogen is the smallest known within its class. It is a reduced genomic species and it does not have many genes regulating transcription. It has a circular genome of 927,303 base pairs. Tropheryma whipplei has a low GC content at 46%. Yet, it was originally considered high because 552/808 identified open reading frames have their closest homologs within other Actinobacteria class genomes. An open reading frames (ORF) is important to determine once a gene has been sequenced, as it deals with where the encoded proteins are first transcribed into messenger RNA and then translated into a protein. A particular nucleotide will start and another will stop (known as a stop codon) translation; this is an ORF. Due to its small genomic size, much has yet to be discovered.[3][4]
Cell structure
The most interesting thing about Tropheryma whipplei is the fact that it has such a tiny genome. “Dr Stephen Bentley, who led the team at The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, said, ‘This really is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Within this amazingly small genome, it has packed a sophisticated array of tools to escape our defense mechanisms. It’s an incredibly adept operator which can tell us a great deal about bacteria and their evolution'”. It is the “master of disguise”, as even though it has only caused a few cases of disease and, once again, has such a small genome, it really molds itself to its environment in a noteworthy way. Just to put into perspective how small it is, most bacterial genomes are three to four times larger, code for about 3,000 genes as opposed to around 800, and have hardly any repetitive DNA.[2] Tropheryma whipplei has about five percent of its DNA sequences repeated which also aides in its ability to deviate itself over and over again. It “carries a set of DNA sequences unlike anything previously seen in bacterial genomes.” This is the case because it, as far as research has come to discover, selects new regions that it then incorporates into the genes that encode its single outer coating; this is the reason why Dr. Stephen is quoted saying it is like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, because it never gives its host a chance to realize what it is, as it is constantly morphing and changing into something repeatedly different. Not only does it disguise itself in this manner, but it also takes the membranes from the host cells to “hide” in as well. Hence, with these two forms of camouflage, the body doesn’t or has a hard time detecting the presence of Tropheryma whipplei, as it hides in the lining of the human gut, where it gains its energy.[2] Even though it is so small, it still is well equipped for its metabolic activities. However, there are deficiencies of ten amino acids in the biosynthetic pathways. For example, there is a lack of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase gene homologues. Thioredoxin is usually in its reduced state in an NADPH-dependent reaction, acting as an electron donor. Tropheryma whipplei also has a mutation in the DNA gyrase, which relates to the fact that it is resistant to quinolone antibiotic. Because of its metabolic deficiencies, like the major energy producing system, which is the Krebs or TCA it must get the nutrients it needs from the environment, in this case, the stomach lining. It also has to rely on its host for the synthesis of essential amino acids like arginine and histidine, as it cannot produce these for itself either.[5][6]
Ecology
Tropheryma whipplei is suspected to have an environmental origin because its closest known relatives originated from the soil. However, Tropheryma whipplei is solely dependent on humans. Tropheryma whipplei inside its host is constantly reshaping itself and invade other organs. The fact that it is also very difficult to cultivate without human cells, makes understanding this pathogen harder.[7]
Pathogenesis
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Raoult D, Ogata H, Audic S, Robert C, Suhre K, Drancourt M, Claverie JM (2003). “Tropheryma whipplei Twist: a human pathogenic Actinobacteria with a reduced genome”. Genome Res. 13 (8): 1800–9. doi:10.1101/gr.1474603. PMC 403771. PMID 12902375.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Crapoulet, N.; Barbry, P.; Raoult, D.; Renesto, P. (2006). “Global Transcriptome Analysis of Tropheryma whipplei in Response to Temperature Stresses”. Journal of Bacteriology. 188 (14): 5228–5239. doi:10.1128/JB.00507-06. ISSN 0021-9193.
- ↑ {La Scola B, Fenollar F, Fournier P, Altwegg M, Mallet M, Raoult D (2001). “Description of Tropheryma whipplei gen. nov., sp. nov., the Whipple’s disease bacillus”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 51 (Pt 4): 1471–9. PMID 11491348.
- ↑ Relman D, Schmidt T, MacDermott R, Falkow S (1992). “Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple’s disease”. N Engl J Med. 327 (5): 293–301. PMID 1377787.
- ↑ Boulos, A.; Rolain, J. M.; Mallet, M. N.; Raoult, D. (2005). “Molecular evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Tropheryma whipplei in axenic medium”. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 55 (2): 178–181. doi:10.1093/jac/dkh524. ISSN 1460-2091.
- ↑ Whipple GH. (1907). “A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and msenteric lymphatic tissues”. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull. 18: 382&ndash, 91.
- ↑ Rolain, Jean-Marc; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2007). “False positive PCR detection of Tropheryma whipplei in the saliva of healthy people”. BMC Microbiology. 7 (1): 48. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-7-48. ISSN 1471-2180.
External links
Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, multisystem involvement, such as celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease and systemic infections.
Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases
Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain and multisystem involvement.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
The table below summarizes the diseases that cause malabsorption, diarrhea and abdominal pain.
Abbreviations: WBC: White blood cells; Plt: Platelets, Hgb: Hemoglobin, IgE: Immunoglobulin E, IgA: Immunoglobulin A
| Cause | Peak age of onset | History | Physical exam | Lab findings | Additional findings | Cause/Pathogenesis | Gold standard diagnosis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | Abdominal pain | Diarrhea | Weight loss | |||||||||||
| Watery | Fatty | WBC | Hgb | Plt | Other lab findings | |||||||||
| Whipple’s disease | 40-60 | ± | + | + | + | + |
|
↓ | ↓ | ↓/↑ |
| |||
| Celiac disease | Childhood
Adult |
– | + | +/- | +/- | + | – | ↓ | – |
|
|
|
||
| Cystic fibrosis | Childhood
Adult |
± | + | – | + | + |
|
– | ↓ | – |
|
|
| |
| Crohns disease | Young adults
(20th) |
+ | + | + | + | + | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ |
|
|
|
| |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | 30-50 | – | ± | ± | ± | – |
|
– | – | – |
| |||
| VIPoma | 30-50 | – | + | + | + | + |
|
– | – | – |
|
|
| |
| Zollinger-Ellison syndrome | 20-50 | – | + | + | + | + | – | ↓ | – |
|
| |||
| Lactose intolerance | Any age | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
|
|
| ||
| Eosinophilic gastroenteritis | 30th | – | + | + | + | + | ↑ | – | – |
|
|
|
| |
| Primary bile acid malabsorption | Childhood Adult | – | + | + | + | + | – | ↓ | – |
|
|
| ||
| Abetalipoproteinemia | Infancy
Adult |
– | + | + | + | + | – | – | – |
|
|
|
| |
| Microscopic colitis | 50-70 | – | + | + | – | + | – | ↓ | – |
|
|
|
| |
| Hyperthyroidism | Any age | ± | + | + | – | + | – | – | – |
|
||||
| Grain allergy | Childhood | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – |
|
|
| ||
| Chronic giardiasis | Childhood | – | + | + | + | + | ↔ | ↓ | ↔ |
|
|
| ||
References
- ↑ Hertzler SR, Savaiano DA (1996). “Colonic adaptation to daily lactose feeding in lactose maldigesters reduces lactose intolerance”. Am J Clin Nutr. 64 (2): 232–6. PMID 8694025.
- ↑ Briet F, Pochart P, Marteau P, Flourie B, Arrigoni E, Rambaud JC (1997). “Improved clinical tolerance to chronic lactose ingestion in subjects with lactose intolerance: a placebo effect?”. Gut. 41 (5): 632–5. PMC 1891556. PMID 9414969.
- ↑ BLACK-SCHAFFER B (1949). “The tinctoral demonstration of a glycoprotein in Whipple’s disease”. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 72 (1): 225–7. PMID 15391722.
- ↑ SCOBIE BA, MCGILL DB, PRIESTLEY JT, ROVELSTAD RA (1964). “EXCLUDED GASTRIC ANTRUM SIMULATING THE ZOLLINGER-ELLISON SYNDROME”. Gastroenterology. 47: 184–7. PMID 14201408.
- ↑ Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott ID, Bernstein CN, Brant SR; et al. (2005). “Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology”. Can J Gastroenterol. 19 Suppl A: 5A–36A. PMID 16151544.
- ↑ Sauter GH, Moussavian AC, Meyer G, Steitz HO, Parhofer KG, Jüngst D (2002). “Bowel habits and bile acid malabsorption in the months after cholecystectomy”. Am J Gastroenterol. 97 (7): 1732–5. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05779.x. PMID 12135027.
- ↑ Maiuri L, Raia V, Potter J, Swallow D, Ho MW, Fiocca R; et al. (1991). “Mosaic pattern of lactase expression by villous enterocytes in human adult-type hypolactasia”. Gastroenterology. 100 (2): 359–69. PMID 1702075.
- ↑ RUBIN CE, BRANDBORG LL, PHELPS PC, TAYLOR HC (1960). “Studies of celiac disease. I. The apparent identical and specific nature of the duodenal and proximal jejunal lesion in celiac disease and idiopathic sprue”. Gastroenterology. 38: 28–49. PMID 14439871.
- ↑ Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.
- ↑ Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Whipple’s disease is a systemic disease among middle-aged white males in North America and western Europe. It affects males 8 times more than females. Few studies were done to evaluate the demographics of Whipple’s disease due to the sparsity of the disease. The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals and the prevalence is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy. Although the prevalence of carrier state is higher in Asian and African countries, the prevalence of the classic Whipple’s disease is less than American and western European countries. The case-fatality rate of Whipple’s disease is approximately 100%, if left untreated. The case-fatality rate of treated Whipple’s disease is unknown.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence
- The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy.[1]
- The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 12 annually worldwide.[2]
- Between 1907 and 1987, the incidence of Whipple’s disease was estimated to be 696 cases worldwide.[2]
Prevalence
Classic Whipple’s disease
- The prevalence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy.[1]
Carrier state
- In Europe, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 1,000-11,000 per 100,000 of general adult population.[3][4]
- In Senegal, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 75,000 per 100,000 of children under 4 years of age.[5]
- In Laos, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 48,000 per 100,000 individuals by using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the feces of children.[6]
- In Ghana, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 27,500 per 100,000 individuals by using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the feces of children.[7]
Case-fatality rate
- The case-fatality rate of Whipple’s disease is approximately 100%, if left untreated.[8]
- The case-fatality rate of treated Whipple’s disease is unknown.[9]
Age
- Whipple’s disease commonly affects individuals between 40 to 60 years of age; the median age at diagnosis is 50 years.[10]
Race
- Whipple’s disease usually affects individuals of the caucasian race. Africans and Asians are less likely to develop Whipple’s disease.[11]
Gender
- Males are more commonly affected by Whipple’s disease than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 8 to 1.[10]
Region
- The majority of Whipple’s disease cases are reported in North America and western Europe.[12]
Developed Countries
- In Europe, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 1,000-11,000 per 100,000 of general adult population.[3][4]
Developing Countries
- In Senegal, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 75,000 per 100,000 of children under 4 years of age.[5]
- In Laos, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 48,000 per 100,000 individuals by using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the feces of children.[6]
- In Ghana, the prevalence of chronic carrier of Tropheryma whipplei is 27,500 per 100,000 individuals by using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the feces of children.[7]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Biagi, F.; Balduzzi, D.; Delvino, P.; Schiepatti, A.; Klersy, C.; Corazza, G. R. (2015). “Prevalence of Whipple’s disease in north-western Italy”. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 34 (7): 1347–1348. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2357-2. ISSN 0934-9723.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Dobbins W, III. 1987. Whipple’s disease. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, IL.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Fenollar, Florence; Laouira, Sonia; Lepidi, Hubert; Rolain, Jean‐Marc; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Value ofTropheryma whippleiQuantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Diagnosis of Whipple Disease: Usefulness of Saliva and Stool Specimens for First‐Line Screening”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 47 (5): 659–667. doi:10.1086/590559. ISSN 1058-4838.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Fenollar, Florence; Trani, Michèle; Davoust, Bernard; Salle, Bettina; Birg, Marie‐Laure; Rolain, Jean‐Marc; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Prevalence of AsymptomaticTropheryma whippleiCarriage among Humans and Nonhuman Primates”. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 197 (6): 880–887. doi:10.1086/528693. ISSN 0022-1899.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whippleias a commensal bacterium”. Future Microbiology. 8 (1): 57–71. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.124. ISSN 1746-0913.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Small, Pamela L.; Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Dubot-Pérès, Audrey; Phommasone, Koukeo; Sibounheuang, Bountoy; Vongsouvath, Manivanh; Mayxay, Mayfong; Raoult, Didier; Newton, Paul N.; Fenollar, Florence (2015). “High Prevalence of Tropheryma whipplei in Lao Kindergarten Children”. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 9 (2): e0003538. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003538. ISSN 1935-2735.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Vinnemeier CD, Klupp EM, Krumkamp R, Rolling T, Fischer N, OwusuDabo E, Addo MM, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Kasmaier J, Aepfelbacher M, Cramer JP, May J, Tannich E. 2016. Tropheryma whipplei in children with diarrhoea in rural Ghana. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:65.e1– 65.e3
- ↑ Durand DV, Lecomte C, Cathébras P, Rousset H, Godeau P (1997). “Whipple disease. Clinical review of 52 cases. The SNFMI Research Group on Whipple Disease. Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne”. Medicine (Baltimore). 76 (3): 170–84. PMID 9193452.
- ↑ Marth, Thomas; Raoult, Didier (2003). “Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet. 361 (9353): 239–246. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12274-X. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Marth, Thomas (2015). “Tropheryma whipplei, Immunosuppression and Whipple’s Disease: From a Low-Pathogenic, Environmental Infectious Organism to a Rare, Multifaceted Inflammatory Complex”. Digestive Diseases. 33 (2): 190–199. doi:10.1159/000369538. ISSN 0257-2753.
- ↑ Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
- ↑ Fenollar, Florence; Puéchal, Xavier; Raoult, Didier (2007). “Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 356 (1): 55–66. doi:10.1056/NEJMra062477. ISSN 0028-4793.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease may be environmental, genetic, and immunologic. The most important risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets. Defective cellular immunity is the less common risk factor.
Risk Factors
- Risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease may be environmental, genetic, and immunologic.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]
- The most potent risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets.
Common risk factors
- Common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease include:
- Poor sanitation
- Living in homeless shelters
- Absence of toilets
- Sewage influxed plants
- Close contact with patients or chronic carriers
Less common risk factors
- Less common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease include:
- Genetic predisposition including HLA DRB1*13 and HLA DQB1*06 positive
- HIV infection
- Immunosuppressed patients
References
- ↑ Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. Lancet Infect Dis. 8 (3): 179–90. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. PMID 18291339.
- ↑ Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
- ↑ Schoniger-Hekele, M.; Petermann, D.; Weber, B.; Muller, C. (2007). “Tropheryma whipplei in the Environment: Survey of Sewage Plant Influxes and Sewage Plant Workers”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73 (6): 2033–2035. doi:10.1128/AEM.02335-06. ISSN 0099-2240.
- ↑ Bureš, Jan; Kopáčová, Marcela; Douda, Tomáš; Bártová, Jolana; Tomš, Jan; Rejchrt, Stanislav; Tachecí, Ilja (2013). “Whipple’s Disease: Our Own Experience and Review of the Literature”. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2013: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/478349. ISSN 1687-6121.
- ↑ Dutly, F.; Altwegg, M. (2001). “Whipple’s Disease and “Tropheryma whippelii““. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 14 (3): 561–583. doi:10.1128/CMR.14.3.561-583.2001. ISSN 0893-8512.
- ↑ Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
- ↑ Conly JM, Johnston BL (2001). “Rare but not so rare: The evolving spectrum of Whipple’s disease”. Can J Infect Dis. 12 (3): 133–5. PMC 2094813. PMID 18159328.
- ↑ Fenollar, Florence; Lagier, Jean-Christophe; Raoult, Didier (2014). “Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple’s disease”. Journal of Infection. 69 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008. ISSN 0163-4453.
- ↑ Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Brouqui, Philippe; Badiaga, Sékéné; Benkouiten, Samir; Ratmanov, Pavel; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 17 (1): e67–e68. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1033. ISSN 1201-9712.
- ↑ Schwartzman, Sergio; Schwartzman, Monica (2013). “Whipple’s Disease”. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 39 (2): 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2013.03.005. ISSN 0889-857X.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.[1]
References
- ↑ Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Acute infection might present with gastroenteritis, pneumonia or bacteremia. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. Classic Whipple’s disease has 3 clinical phases that starts with nonspecific symptoms and joint pain. It progresses to gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, steatorrhea, malabsorption, and weight loss. in the late phase, all the other organs including CNS, joints, eyes, heart, lung, liver and skin might be involved. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality. Common complications of Whipple’s disease include malnutrition, cardiopulmonary, neurologic and osteoarticular involvement. Malabsorption mostly presents with fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, fatigue, and weight loss. Valvular heart disease and dementia are the most common cardiac and neurologic complication, respectively. The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment started early. Without treatment, Whipple’s disease is fatal.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Each of them has its own progression and natural history. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality.[1]
Acute infection
- Tropheryma whipplei causes acute infections, including:
- Gastroenteritis: Patients have watery diarrhea, steatorrhea, and colicky abdominal pain.[2]
- Pneumonia: Tropheryma whipplei causes pneumonia in HIV patients.[3]
- Bacteremia: Tropheryma whipplei infection could cause self-limiting bacteremia.[4]
Classic Whipple’s disease
Patients who developed the classic Whipple’s disease usually have 3 clinical phases:
- In the early phase, patients have nonspecific symptoms including fever and arthralgia that could last for years.[5]
- In the middle phase, patients develop gastrointestinal symptoms including diarrhea, abdominal pain and weight loss.[6]
- In the late phase, other organs might be involved. Neurologic symptoms including progressive dementia, personality changes and seizures might happen. Eyes, heart, lung, liver, and skin can be involved in this phase.[7]
Localized infection
Patients might present with localized infection instead of systemic involvement after being infected by Tropheryma whipplei.
- Endocarditis: Patients might develop blood culture-negative endocarditis.[8]
- Encephalitis: Ataxia and dementia are common. Empirical antibiotic therapy might be considered for rapid resolution.[9]
- Pulmonary involvement: Patients might present with interstitial lung disease, dry cough and shortness of breath.[10]
- Osteoarticular involvement: Isolated arthritis and spondylodiscitis are happened without systemic manifestations.[11]
- Eyes involvement: Patients might present with isolated uveitis. PCR of aqueous humor is used to establish the diagnosis.[12]
Complications
Common complications of Whipple’s disease include:[13][14][15][1][16]
- Malnutrition
- Vitamin deficiency
- Vitamin A deficiency that presents with night blindness.
- Vitamin D deficiency that presents with nonspecific symptoms including fatigue, muscle pain and osteomalacia.
- Vitamin E deficiency that presents with neuromuscular problems and immunity impairment.
- Vitamin K deficiency that presents with bleeding.
- Weight loss
- Vitamin deficiency
- Cardiac complications
- Neurologic complications
- Pulmonary complications
Prognosis
- The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment started early.[14]
- The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is generally very poor if left untreated.[13]
- The presence of neurologic symptoms is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with Whipple’s disease.[15]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
- ↑ Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence; Rolain, Jean-Marc; Minodier, Philippe; Bosdure, Emmanuelle; Li, Wenjun; Garnier, Jean-Marc; Richet, Hervé (2010). “Tropheryma whipplei in Children with Gastroenteritis”. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 16 (5): 776–782. doi:10.3201/eid1605.091801. ISSN 1080-6040.
- ↑ Lozupone, Catherine; Cota-Gomez, Adela; Palmer, Brent E.; Linderman, Derek J.; Charlson, Emily S.; Sodergren, Erica; Mitreva, Makedonka; Abubucker, Sahar; Martin, John; Yao, Guohui; Campbell, Thomas B.; Flores, Sonia C.; Ackerman, Gail; Stombaugh, Jesse; Ursell, Luke; Beck, James M.; Curtis, Jeffrey L.; Young, Vincent B.; Lynch, Susan V.; Huang, Laurence; Weinstock, George M.; Knox, Kenneth S.; Twigg, Homer; Morris, Alison; Ghedin, Elodie; Bushman, Frederic D.; Collman, Ronald G.; Knight, Rob; Fontenot, Andrew P. (2013). “Widespread Colonization of the Lung byTropheryma whippleiin HIV Infection”. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 187 (10): 1110–1117. doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2145OC. ISSN 1073-449X.
- ↑ Fenollar, Florence; Mediannikov, Oleg; Socolovschi, Cristina; Bassene, Hubert; Diatta, Georges; Richet, Hervé; Tall, Adama; Sokhna, Cheikh; Trape, Jean‐François; Raoult, Didier (2010). “Tropheryma whippleiBacteremia during Fever in Rural West Africa”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 51 (5): 515–521. doi:10.1086/655677. ISSN 1058-4838.
- ↑ Bai, J; Mazure, R; Vazquez, H; Niveloni, S; Smecuol, E; Pedreira, S; Maurino, E (2004). “Whipple’s disease”. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2 (10): 849–860. doi:10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00387-8. ISSN 1542-3565.
- ↑ Puéchal, Xavier (2013). “Whipple’s disease”. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 72 (6): 797–803. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202684. ISSN 0003-4967.
- ↑ Fleming, Jon L.; Wiesner, Russell H.; Shorter, Roy G. (1988). “Whipple’s Disease: Clinical, Biochemical, and Histopathologic Features and Assessment of Treatment in 29 Patients”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 63 (6): 539–551. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(12)64884-8. ISSN 0025-6196.
- ↑ Geissdorfer, W.; Moos, V.; Moter, A.; Loddenkemper, C.; Jansen, A.; Tandler, R.; Morguet, A. J.; Fenollar, F.; Raoult, D.; Bogdan, C.; Schneider, T. (2011). “High Frequency of Tropheryma whipplei in Culture-Negative Endocarditis”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 50 (2): 216–222. doi:10.1128/JCM.05531-11. ISSN 0095-1137.
- ↑ Fenollar, Florence; Nicoli, François; Paquet, Claire; Lepidi, Hubert; Cozzone, Patrick; Antoine, Jean-Christophe; Pouget, Jean; Raoult, Didier (2011). “Progressive dementia associated with ataxia or obesity in patients with Tropheryma whipplei encephalitis”. BMC Infectious Diseases. 11 (1). doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-171. ISSN 1471-2334.
- ↑ Urbanski, Geoffrey; Rivereau, Philippe; Artru, Laure; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier; Puéchal, Xavier (2012). “Whipple Disease Revealed by Lung Involvement”. Chest. 141 (6): 1595–1598. doi:10.1378/chest.11-1812. ISSN 0012-3692.
- ↑ Bruhlmann, P. (2000). “Diagnosis and therapy monitoring of Whipple’s arthritis by polymerase chain reaction”. Rheumatology. 39 (12): 1427–1428. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1427. ISSN 1460-2172.
- ↑ Bauerfeind, Peter; Koelz, Hans-Rudolf; Altwegg, Martin (1999). “PCR for Tropheryma whippelii”. The Lancet. 354 (9188): 1476–1477. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77620-0. ISSN 0140-6736.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Fenollar, Florence; Lagier, Jean-Christophe; Raoult, Didier (2014). “Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple’s disease”. Journal of Infection. 69 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008. ISSN 0163-4453.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Bureš, Jan; Kopáčová, Marcela; Douda, Tomáš; Bártová, Jolana; Tomš, Jan; Rejchrt, Stanislav; Tachecí, Ilja (2013). “Whipple’s Disease: Our Own Experience and Review of the Literature”. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2013: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/478349. ISSN 1687-6121.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Dutly, F.; Altwegg, M. (2001). “Whipple’s Disease and “Tropheryma whippelii““. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 14 (3): 561–583. doi:10.1128/CMR.14.3.561-583.2001. ISSN 0893-8512.
- ↑ Fenollar, Florence; Puéchal, Xavier; Raoult, Didier (2007). “Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 356 (1): 55–66. doi:10.1056/NEJMra062477. ISSN 0028-4793.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH








