Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Whipple's disease

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Intestinal lipodystrophy; Whipple disease

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple’s disease is a rare, systemic infectious disease caused by the bacterium Tropheryma whipplei. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. Following contamination, based on immunologic response, patient might present with different manifestations including acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Whipple’s disease primarily causes malabsorption but may affect any part of the body including the heart, lungs, brain, joints, and eyes. Diagnostic findings of Whipple’s disease include PAS positive inclusions in macrophages of lamina propria. Endoscopy and small bowel biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease. Antimicrobial therapy is the mainstay of therapy for Whipple’s disease.

Historical Perspective

Whipple described the disease for the first time in 1907 as a gastrointestinal disorder and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy.” Light and electron microscopy on small bowel biopsy were used to detect bacilli inside the intestinal mucosa. In 1952, systemic antibiotics were used to treat the disease which confirmed the infective nature of the disease. It took almost 100 years for investigators to cultivate the bacterium and sequenced the genome.

Classification

Whipple’s disease may be classified into two groups of acute and chronic infection. It might be classified as systemic or localized based on the organ involvement. It has four different clinical manifestations: Acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.

Pathophysiology

Whipple’s disease is a rare systemic disease. Therefore, some aspects of pathogenesis have remained unclear. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, genetic and immunologic factors play important roles in clinical manifestation of Tropheryma whipplei infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. There is a decreased activity of the T helper cells type 1 and increased activity of the T helper cells type 2. Defective phagocytic system is responsible for replication of bacteria in macrophages and spread of bacteria to other tissues. Characteristic of Whipple’s disease is presence of foamy macrophages in the lamina propria that is periodic acid-Schiff stain positive.

Causes

Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium and the causative organism of Whipple’s disease. While Tropheryma whipplei is categorized with the gram-positive Actinobacteria, the organism is commonly found to be gram-negative or gram-indeterminate when stained in the laboratory. Whipple himself probably observed the organisms as rod-shaped structures with silver stain in his original case, but no name was given to the organism until 1991 when the name Tropheryma whippelii was proposed after sections of the bacterial genome were sequenced. The name was changed to Tropheryma whipplei in 2001 (correcting the spelling of Whipple’s name) after deposition in bacterial collections.

Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases

Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain, multisystem involvement, such as celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease and systemic infections.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Whipple’s disease is a systemic disease among middle-aged white males in North America and western Europe. It affects males 8 times more than females. Few studies were done to evaluate the demographics of Whipple’s disease due to the sparsity of the disease. The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals and the prevalence is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy. Although the prevalence of carrier state is higher in Asian and African countries, the prevalence of the classic Whipple’s disease is less than American and western European countries. The case-fatality rate of Whipple’s disease is approximately 100%, if left untreated. The case-fatality rate of treated Whipple’s disease is unknown.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease may be environmental, genetic, and immunologic. The most important risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets. Defective cellular immunity is the less common risk factor.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Acute infection might present with gastroenteritis, pneumonia or bacteremia. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. Classic Whipple’s disease has 3 clinical phases that starts with nonspecific symptoms and joint pain. It progresses to gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, steatorrhea, malabsorption, and weight loss. in the late phase, all the other organs including CNS, joints, eyes, heart, lung, liver and skin might be involved. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality.

Complications

Common complications of Whipple’s disease include malnutrition, cardiopulmonary, neurologic and osteoarticular involvement. Malabsorption mostly presents with fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, fatigue, and weight loss. Valvular heart disease and dementia are the most common cardiac and neurologic complication, respectively.

Prognosis

The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment with antibiotics started early. Without treatment, whipple’s disease is fatal.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease.

History and Symptoms

Patients with Whipple’s disease have various presentations. Most common symptoms of the classic Whipple’s disease include joint pain, weight loss, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Other organ systems can be involved in Whipple’s disease including central nervous system, cardiac system, renal system, skeletal, muscles and pulmonary system.

Physical Examination

Patients with Whipple’s disease usually appear weak. Physical examination of patients with Whipple’s disease is usually remarkable for weight loss and signs of vitamin deficiency. Further physical findings depend on the systems involved in the disease. Abnormal eye movements including oculomasticatory myorhythmia, or oculofacial-skeletal myorhythmia are pathognomonic for the Whipple’s disease.

Laboratory Findings

Some patients with Whipple’s disease may have abnormal hematological findings and elevated acute phase reactants, which is suggestive of the infection. Laboratory evidence of malabsorption including hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia may be seen.

Imaging Findings

The imaging findings associated with Whipple’s disease depend on the system involved. These findings are not diagnostic. In patients with pulmonary involvement, chest imaging including x-ray or CT scan may demonstrate pulmonary infiltrates, pleural effusion, nodular pattern, small lung volumes, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Abdominal CT scan may show thickening of small bowel folds and enlarged abdominal lymph nodes.

Head CT scan may show generalized cerebral atrophy or focal lesions including small granulomas in the gray matter of the cerebral and cerebellar cortex or microinfarctions.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Endoscopy and small bowel biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease. Diagnostic findings of Whipple’s disease include, PAS positive inclusions in macrophages of lamina propria. Other diagnostic studies for Whipple’s disease include electron microscopy which demonstrate bacteria, immunofluorescent assay to detect antibodies against Tropheryma whipplei and PCR, which demonstrates 16S rRNA gene of Tropheryma whipplei.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Antimicrobial therapy is the mainstay of therapy for Whipple’s disease. Intravenous ceftriaxone or penicillin G is indicated in the acute phase of Whipple’s therapy. For maintenance therapy, patients are typically treated with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for at least 1 year. Patients who experience either Whipple’s disease or allergy to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim require a combination of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine. Dietary supplements including vitamins, iron, folic acid, calcium and magnesium is needed. Following antibiotic therapy, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) might occur that requires oral corticosteroid. Lifelong follow-up is needed to detect relapse.

Surgery

The mainstay of treatment for Whipple’s disease is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with cardiac complications and heart valves involvement.

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of Whipple’s disease. However, general measurement including proper sanitation decreases the risk of infection with Tropheryma whipplei.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of Whipple’s disease.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple described the disease for the first time in 1907 as a gastrointestinal disorder and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy.” Light and electron microscopy on small bowel biopsy were used to detect bacilli inside the intestinal mucosa. In 1952, systemic antibiotics were used to treat the disease which confirmed the infective nature of the disease. It took almost 100 years for investigators to cultivate the bacterium and sequenced the genome.

Historical Perspective

Year Investigator Landmark event
1907 George Hoyt Whipple Described the Whipple’s disease for the first time and named it as “intestinal lipodystrophy“.
1947 Oliver-Pascual Reported a case of “intestinal lipodystrophy” before the death of a patient.
1949 Black-Schaffer Strained the bacilli with periodic acid-Schiff stain; renamed to “Whipple’s disease.”
1952 Pauley Successfully used systemic antibiotics for treatment of the “Whipple’s disease.”
1958 Bolt Used small bowel biopsy to differentiate malabsorption diseases and confirm the Whipple’s disease.
1961 Chears and Ashworth Used electron microscopy and cytochemical study to detect the bacilli inside the intestinal macrophages.
1961 Yardley and Hendrix  Used combined electron and light microscopy to detect the rod-shaped structures in the intestinal mucosa.
1991 Wilson Sequenced a 16S rRNA of a new bacterium partially and classified it within the Actinomycetes clade.
1992 Relman Confirmed the previous result and extended the 16S rRNA sequence by using PCR; named the bacterium “Tropheryma whippleii” for the first time.
2000 Raoult Reported isolation and cultivation of “Tropheryma whippleii” for the first time.
2001 La Scola Characterized the bacterium phenotypically; slightly renamed it to “Tropheryma whipplei.”
2003 Bentley

Raoult

Analyzed and sequenced the genome of two different strains of Tropheryma whipplei.

Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies

References

  1. Whipple G H. A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and mesenteric lymphatic tissues. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1907;198:383.
  2. OLIVER-PASCUAL E, GALAN J (1947). “[Not Available]”. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig Nutr (in Undetermined). 6 (3): 213–26. PMID 20251637.
  3. BLACK-SCHAFFER B (1949). “The tinctoral demonstration of a glycoprotein in Whipple’s disease”. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 72 (1): 225–7. PMID 15391722.
  4. 4.0 4.1 PAULLEY JW (1952). “A case of Whipple’s disease (intestinal lipodystrophy)”. Gastroenterology. 22 (1): 128–33. PMID 12980233.
  5. Bolt, Robert J.; Pollard, H. Marvin; Standaert, Ludovic (1958). “Transoral Small-Bowel Biopsy as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Malabsorption States”. New England Journal of Medicine. 259 (1): 32–34. doi:10.1056/NEJM195807032590107. ISSN 0028-4793.
  6. CHEARS WC, ASHWORTH CT (1961). “Electron microscopic study of the intestinal mucosa in Whipple’s disease. Demonstration of encapsulated bacilliform bodies in the lesion”. Gastroenterology. 41: 129–38. PMID 13692693.
  7. YARDLEY JH, HENDRIX TR (1961). “Combined electron and light microscopy in Whipple’s disease. Demonstration of “bacillary bodies” in the intestine”. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 109: 80–98. PMID 13787237.
  8. Wilson KH, Blitchington R, Frothingham R, Wilson JA (1991). “Phylogeny of the Whipple’s-disease-associated bacterium”. Lancet. 338 (8765): 474–5. PMID 1714530.
  9. Relman, David A.; Schmidt, Thomas M.; MacDermott, Richard P.; Falkow, Stanley (1992). “Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (5): 293–301. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207303270501. ISSN 0028-4793.
  10. Raoult, Didier; Birg, Marie L.; Scola, Bernard La; Fournier, Pierre E.; Enea, Maryse; Lepidi, Hubert; Roux, Veronique; Piette, Jean-Charles; Vandenesch, François; Vital-Durand, Denis; Marrie, Tom J. (2000). “Cultivation of the Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 342 (9): 620–625. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003023420903. ISSN 0028-4793.
  11. La Scola, B; Altwegg, M; Mallet, M N; Fournier, P E; Fenollar, F; Raoult, D (2001). “Description of Tropheryma whipplei gen. nov., sp. nov., the Whipple’s disease bacillus”. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 51 (4): 1471–1479. doi:10.1099/00207713-51-4-1471. ISSN 1466-5026.
  12. Bentley, Stephen D; Maiwald, Matthias; Murphy, Lee D; Pallen, Mark J; Yeats, Corin A; Dover, Lynn G; Norbertczak, Halina T; Besra, Gurdyal S; Quail, Michael A; Harris, David E; von Herbay, Axel; Goble, Arlette; Rutter, Simon; Squares, Robert; Squares, Stephen; Barrell, Bart G; Parkhill, Julian; Relman, David A (2003). “Sequencing and analysis of the genome of the Whipple’s disease bacterium Tropheryma whipplei”. The Lancet. 361 (9358): 637–644. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12597-4. ISSN 0140-6736.
  13. Raoult D, Ogata H, Audic S, Robert C, Suhre K, Drancourt M, Claverie JM (2003). “Tropheryma whipplei Twist: a human pathogenic Actinobacteria with a reduced genome”. Genome Res. 13 (8): 1800–9. doi:10.1101/gr.1474603. PMC 403771. PMID 12902375.

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple’s disease may be classified into two groups of acute and chronic infection. It might be classified as systemic or localized based on the organ involvement. It has four different clinical manifestations: Acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.

Classification

  • Whipple’s disease may be classified to two groups of acute and chronic based on the duration.[1][2]


Whipple’s disease classification based on the duration:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Whipple’s disease classification
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acute
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chronic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gastroenteritis
 
Pneumonia
 
Bacteremia
 
Asymptomatic carrier state
 
 
Classic Whipple’s disease
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chronic localized infection
 
 
 
 
 
 



Whipple’s disease classification based on organ involvement:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Whipple’s disease classification
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Systemic involvement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Localized involvement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Heart
 
CNS
 
Eye
 
Lung
 
Bone
 
Serosa
 
Skin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blood culture negative endocarditis
• Adhesive pericarditis
Myocardial fibrosis
 
Encephalitis
• Progressive dementia
Cerebellar ataxia
Personality changes
Hemiparesis
Seizure
Wernicke’s encephalopathy
Hypothalamic involvement
Supranuclear ophthalmoplegia
 
Uveitis
Vitritis
Retinitis
Retrobulbar neuritis
Papilledema
 
• Chronic cough
Dyspnea
 
Arthritis
Spondylodiscitis
 
Pleuritic chest pain
 
Hyperpigmentation
 
 



References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Marth, Thomas (2009). “New Insights into Whipple’s Disease – A Rare Intestinal Inflammatory Disorder”. Digestive Diseases. 27 (4): 494–501. doi:10.1159/000233288. ISSN 1421-9875.
  2. Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
  3. Relman, David A.; Schmidt, Thomas M.; MacDermott, Richard P.; Falkow, Stanley (1992). “Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (5): 293–301. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207303270501. ISSN 0028-4793.
  4. Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
  5. Ectors N, Geboes K, De Vos R, Heidbuchel H, Rutgeerts P, Desmet V, Vantrappen G (1992). “Whipple’s disease: a histological, immunocytochemical and electronmicroscopic study of the immune response in the small intestinal mucosa”. Histopathology. 21 (1): 1–12. PMID 1378814.
  6. Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple’s disease is a rare systemic disease. Therefore, some aspects of pathogenesis have remained unclear. Tropheryma whipplei is usually transmitted through oral route to human hosts. There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, genetic and immunologic factors play important roles in clinical manifestation of Tropheryma whipplei infection. Individuals with positive HLA-B27 and defective cellular immunity including AIDS are at risk for Whipple’s disease. Impaired macrophage function and cellular immunity are the main factors in replication of the bacteria and disease expansion to every tissue. There is a decreased activity of the T helper cells type 1 and increased activity of the T helper cells type 2. Defective phagocytic system is responsible for replication of bacteria in macrophages and spread of bacteria to other tissues. Characteristic of Whipple’s disease is presence of foamy macrophages in the lamina propria that is periodic acid-Schiff stain positive.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

  • The bacterium lives in soil and wastewater. Farmers and everyone who has any contact with contaminated soil and water are at high risk of the infection.[3]
  • It is transmitted through oro-oral and feco-oral routes. The poor sanitation is associated with Tropheryma whipplei infection.[4]
  • It is believed that human being is the only host for this bacterium.[5]
  • Tropheryma whipplei infection causes four different clinical manifestations: acute infection, asymptomatic carrier state, the classic Whipple’s disease, and localized chronic infection.[9][10]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contamination via oro-oral or feco-oral route
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acute infection
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Antibody production
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Strong immune response
 
 
 
 
 
Insufficient immune response
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Complete eradication
 
 
 
Chronic carrier
 
 
Chronic infection
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Classic Whipple’s disease
 
 
 
Localized infection
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cure
 
Relapse
 
Re-infection
 
Death
 

Immunologic response

Followings are some of the observations that indicate the immunologic nature of the Whipple’s disease:

Defective cellular immunity

Defective macrophagic/phagocytic system

Defective humoral immunity

Genetics

There is no known causative genetic factor for Whipple’s disease. However, there is an association between Whipple’s disease and some immunologic defects.

  • Studies showed that individuals with specific HLA type (HLA alleles DRB1*13 and DQB1*06) have a higher risk of Whipple’s disease.[9]

Associated Conditions

The most important conditions associated with Whipple’s disease include:

Gross Pathology

  • On endoscopy, pale yellow mucosa with whitish spots, greenish brown and erythematous patches, and both engorged and flattened folds are characteristic findings of Whipple’s disease.[17]

Microscopic Pathology

Below images show the characteristic feature of Whipple’s disease: foamy macrophages are present in the lamina propria.[19]

Periodic acid-Schiff stain of a small intestinal lesion of Whipple’s disease by Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA[20]
GMS stain of a small intestinal lesion of Whipple’s disease by Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA[21]
High magnification micrograph of Whipple’s disease. H&E stain. Duodenal biopsy by Nephron[22]
Periodic acid-Schiff stain of a small intestinal lesion of Whipple’s disease by Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA[23]
Periodic acid-Schiff stain of a small intestinal lesion of Whipple’s disease by By Mrwick1[24]
Light microscopy of intestine – Whipples Disease From PEIR – University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Pathology[25]
Periodic acid-Schiff stain of a small intestinal lesion of Whipple’s disease by Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA[26]
Acid-fast stain negative bacilli in a patient with Whipple’s disease by Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA[27]

References

  1. Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. Lancet Infect Dis. 8 (3): 179–90. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. PMID 18291339.
  2. Schwartzman, Sergio; Schwartzman, Monica (2013). “Whipple’s Disease”. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 39 (2): 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2013.03.005. ISSN 0889-857X.
  3. Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Diatta, Georges; Ratmanov, Pavel; Bassene, Hubert; Raoult, Didier; Roucher, Clémentine; Fenollar, Florence; Sokhna, Cheikh; Tall, Adama; Trape, Jean-François; Mediannikov, Oleg (2013). “Looking for Tropheryma whipplei Source and Reservoir in Rural Senegal”. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 88 (2): 339–343. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0614. ISSN 0002-9637.
  4. Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Brouqui, Philippe; Badiaga, Sékéné; Benkouiten, Samir; Ratmanov, Pavel; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 17 (1): e67–e68. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1033. ISSN 1201-9712.
  5. Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.
  7. Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Marth T, Roux M, von Herbay A, Meuer SC, Feurle GE (1994). “Persistent reduction of complement receptor 3 alpha-chain expressing mononuclear blood cells and transient inhibitory serum factors in Whipple’s disease”. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 72 (2): 217–26. PMID 7519533.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Marth, Thomas (2009). “New Insights into Whipple’s Disease – A Rare Intestinal Inflammatory Disorder”. Digestive Diseases. 27 (4): 494–501. doi:10.1159/000233288. ISSN 1421-9875.
  10. Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ectors N, Geboes K, De Vos R, Heidbuchel H, Rutgeerts P, Desmet V, Vantrappen G (1992). “Whipple’s disease: a histological, immunocytochemical and electronmicroscopic study of the immune response in the small intestinal mucosa”. Histopathology. 21 (1): 1–12. PMID 1378814.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Marth T, Kleen N, Stallmach A, Ring S, Aziz S, Schmidt C, Strober W, Zeitz M, Schneider T (2002). “Dysregulated peripheral and mucosal Th1/Th2 response in Whipple’s disease”. Gastroenterology. 123 (5): 1468–77. PMID 12404221.
  13. Schinnerling K, Moos V, Geelhaar A, Allers K, Loddenkemper C, Friebel J, Conrad K, Kühl AA, Erben U, Schneider T (2011). “Regulatory T cells in patients with Whipple’s disease”. J. Immunol. 187 (8): 4061–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1101349. PMID 21918190.
  14. Desnues B, Raoult D, Mege JL (2005). “IL-16 is critical for Tropheryma whipplei replication in Whipple’s disease”. J. Immunol. 175 (7): 4575–82. PMID 16177102.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Marth T, Neurath M, Cuccherini BA, Strober W (1997). “Defects of monocyte interleukin 12 production and humoral immunity in Whipple’s disease”. Gastroenterology. 113 (2): 442–8. PMID 9247462.
  16. Schneider T, Stallmach A, von Herbay A, Marth T, Strober W, Zeitz M (1998). “Treatment of refractory Whipple disease with interferon-gamma”. Ann. Intern. Med. 129 (11): 875–7. PMID 9867729.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Salkic, Nermin N.; Alibegovic, Ervin; Jovanovic, Predrag (2013). “Endoscopic appearance of duodenal mucosa in Whipple’s disease”. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 77 (5): 822–823. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.016. ISSN 0016-5107.
  18. Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
  19. https://commons.wikimedia.org
  20. “File:Whipples Disease, PAS (6881958655).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  21. “File:Whipples Disease, GMS (6881505399).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  22. “File:Whipple disease -a- high mag.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  23. “File:Whipples Disease, PAS (6881958605).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  24. “File:Whipple disease.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  25. “File:Whipple2.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”. External link in |title= (help)
  26. “File:Whipple pas+.jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.
  27. “File:Whipples Disease, Kinyoun Carbolfuchsin Acid-Fast Stain (6881505345).jpg – Wikimedia Commons”.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium and the causative organism of Whipple’s disease. While Tropheryma whipplei is categorized with the gram-positive Actinobacteria, the organism is commonly found to be gram-negative or gram-indeterminate when stained in the laboratory. Whipple himself probably observed the organisms as rod-shaped structures with silver stain in his original case, but no name was given to the organism until 1991 when the name Tropheryma whippelii was proposed after sections of the bacterial genome were sequenced. The name was changed to Tropheryma whipplei in 2001 (correcting the spelling of Whipple’s name) after deposition in bacterial collections.

Description

Tropheryma whipplei is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium. It was finally isolated in eukaryotic cells in the year 2000 and propagated in a culture at 37 degrees Celsius, but was believed to resist culturing for a long time. In fact, it still can only be cultured if part of its eukaryotic host is present. The isolation from human cells and the culturing has allowed more characterization, including sequencing its genome that has resulted in 808 predicted protein-coding gene sequences, even though it grows at a very slow rate of about 4 to 17 days.[1][2]

It is mesophilic, meaning it grows best at moderate temperatures ranging between 25 and 40 degrees Celsius. Its optimal temperature is 37 degrees Celsius. However, Tropheryma whipplei has a special ability as even though it is not affected by heat shock, it can modify its transcriptome following cold shock at a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius; this proves that although it lacks a lot of typical regulatory elements, it still has a highly adaptive response to thermal stresses that would be typical with its potential environmental origin being that of something probably at lower temperatures (something still being studied), thereby allowing it to live and adapt in cold conditions.[1][2]

Structure

Genome structure

Tropheryma whipplei has a 0.92 Mb genome, placing it in a high-GC-content gram-positive bacterial group.[2] It is the only known human pathogen with a reduced genome sequence within the class of Actinobacteria. This means that this pathogen is the smallest known within its class. It is a reduced genomic species and it does not have many genes regulating transcription. It has a circular genome of 927,303 base pairs. Tropheryma whipplei has a low GC content at 46%. Yet, it was originally considered high because 552/808 identified open reading frames have their closest homologs within other Actinobacteria class genomes. An open reading frames (ORF) is important to determine once a gene has been sequenced, as it deals with where the encoded proteins are first transcribed into messenger RNA and then translated into a protein. A particular nucleotide will start and another will stop (known as a stop codon) translation; this is an ORF. Due to its small genomic size, much has yet to be discovered.[3][4]

Cell structure

The most interesting thing about Tropheryma whipplei is the fact that it has such a tiny genome. “Dr Stephen Bentley, who led the team at The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, said, ‘This really is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Within this amazingly small genome, it has packed a sophisticated array of tools to escape our defense mechanisms. It’s an incredibly adept operator which can tell us a great deal about bacteria and their evolution'”. It is the “master of disguise”, as even though it has only caused a few cases of disease and, once again, has such a small genome, it really molds itself to its environment in a noteworthy way. Just to put into perspective how small it is, most bacterial genomes are three to four times larger, code for about 3,000 genes as opposed to around 800, and have hardly any repetitive DNA.[2] Tropheryma whipplei has about five percent of its DNA sequences repeated which also aides in its ability to deviate itself over and over again. It “carries a set of DNA sequences unlike anything previously seen in bacterial genomes.” This is the case because it, as far as research has come to discover, selects new regions that it then incorporates into the genes that encode its single outer coating; this is the reason why Dr. Stephen is quoted saying it is like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, because it never gives its host a chance to realize what it is, as it is constantly morphing and changing into something repeatedly different. Not only does it disguise itself in this manner, but it also takes the membranes from the host cells to “hide” in as well. Hence, with these two forms of camouflage, the body doesn’t or has a hard time detecting the presence of Tropheryma whipplei, as it hides in the lining of the human gut, where it gains its energy.[2] Even though it is so small, it still is well equipped for its metabolic activities. However, there are deficiencies of ten amino acids in the biosynthetic pathways. For example, there is a lack of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase gene homologues. Thioredoxin is usually in its reduced state in an NADPH-dependent reaction, acting as an electron donor. Tropheryma whipplei also has a mutation in the DNA gyrase, which relates to the fact that it is resistant to quinolone antibiotic. Because of its metabolic deficiencies, like the major energy producing system, which is the Krebs or TCA it must get the nutrients it needs from the environment, in this case, the stomach lining. It also has to rely on its host for the synthesis of essential amino acids like arginine and histidine, as it cannot produce these for itself either.[5][6]

Ecology

Tropheryma whipplei is suspected to have an environmental origin because its closest known relatives originated from the soil. However, Tropheryma whipplei is solely dependent on humans. Tropheryma whipplei inside its host is constantly reshaping itself and invade other organs. The fact that it is also very difficult to cultivate without human cells, makes understanding this pathogen harder.[7]

Pathogenesis

See Whipple’s disease

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Raoult D, Ogata H, Audic S, Robert C, Suhre K, Drancourt M, Claverie JM (2003). “Tropheryma whipplei Twist: a human pathogenic Actinobacteria with a reduced genome”. Genome Res. 13 (8): 1800–9. doi:10.1101/gr.1474603. PMC 403771. PMID 12902375.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Crapoulet, N.; Barbry, P.; Raoult, D.; Renesto, P. (2006). “Global Transcriptome Analysis of Tropheryma whipplei in Response to Temperature Stresses”. Journal of Bacteriology. 188 (14): 5228–5239. doi:10.1128/JB.00507-06. ISSN 0021-9193.
  3. {La Scola B, Fenollar F, Fournier P, Altwegg M, Mallet M, Raoult D (2001). “Description of Tropheryma whipplei gen. nov., sp. nov., the Whipple’s disease bacillus”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 51 (Pt 4): 1471–9. PMID 11491348.
  4. Relman D, Schmidt T, MacDermott R, Falkow S (1992). “Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple’s disease”. N Engl J Med. 327 (5): 293–301. PMID 1377787.
  5. Boulos, A.; Rolain, J. M.; Mallet, M. N.; Raoult, D. (2005). “Molecular evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Tropheryma whipplei in axenic medium”. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 55 (2): 178–181. doi:10.1093/jac/dkh524. ISSN 1460-2091.
  6. Whipple GH. (1907). “A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and msenteric lymphatic tissues”. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull. 18: 382&ndash, 91.
  7. Rolain, Jean-Marc; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2007). “False positive PCR detection of Tropheryma whipplei in the saliva of healthy people”. BMC Microbiology. 7 (1): 48. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-7-48. ISSN 1471-2180.

Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, multisystem involvement, such as celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease and systemic infections.

Differentiating Whipple’s disease from other Diseases

Whipple’s disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain and multisystem involvement.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]

The table below summarizes the diseases that cause malabsorption, diarrhea and abdominal pain.

Abbreviations: WBC: White blood cells; Plt: Platelets, Hgb: Hemoglobin, IgE: Immunoglobulin E, IgA: Immunoglobulin A

Cause Peak age of onset History Physical exam Lab findings Additional findings Cause/Pathogenesis Gold standard diagnosis
Fever Abdominal pain Diarrhea Weight loss
Watery Fatty WBC Hgb Plt Other lab findings
Whipple’s disease 40-60 ± + + + + ↓/↑
Celiac disease Childhood

Adult

+ +/- +/- +
  • IgA endomysial antibody
  • Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody
  • Anti-gliadin antibody
  • IgA endomysial antibody
  • IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody
Cystic fibrosis Childhood

Adult

± + + +
  • Positive DNA analysis for CFTR
  • Evaluated nasal transepithelial potential difference (NPD)
Crohns disease Young adults

(20th)

+ + + + +
  • Abnormal immune response to self antigens
Irritable bowel syndrome 30-50 ± ± ±
  • Diagnosis of exclusion
VIPoma 30-50 + + + +
  • Primary secretory tumor
  • Elevated VIP levels
  • Followed by imaging
Zollinger-Ellison syndrome 20-50 + + + +
  • Elevated basal or stimulated serum gastrin> 120 pg/mL
Lactose intolerance Any age + +
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis  30th + + + +
Primary bile acid malabsorption Childhood Adult + + + +
Abetalipoproteinemia Infancy

Adult

+ + + +
Microscopic colitis 50-70 + + +
Hyperthyroidism Any age ± + + +
  • Elevated T4
  • Elevated T3
  • Decreased TSH
Grain allergy Childhood + + +
Chronic giardiasis Childhood + + + +
  • Flatulence
  • Foul-smelling stools
  • May mimic IBS or other malabsorptive disorders
  • Caused by Giardia lamblia, a flagellated protozoan
  • Transmitted via fecal-oral route
  • Adheres to small intestinal mucosa, causing mucosal injury, enzyme dysfunction, and malabsorption without invasion
  • Stool antigen test (ELISA or immunoassay) or PCR
  • Stool ova and parasite exam
  • Duodenal biopsy or aspirate (if stool tests negative and high index for suspicion)

References

  1. Hertzler SR, Savaiano DA (1996). “Colonic adaptation to daily lactose feeding in lactose maldigesters reduces lactose intolerance”. Am J Clin Nutr. 64 (2): 232–6. PMID 8694025.
  2. Briet F, Pochart P, Marteau P, Flourie B, Arrigoni E, Rambaud JC (1997). “Improved clinical tolerance to chronic lactose ingestion in subjects with lactose intolerance: a placebo effect?”. Gut. 41 (5): 632–5. PMC 1891556. PMID 9414969.
  3. BLACK-SCHAFFER B (1949). “The tinctoral demonstration of a glycoprotein in Whipple’s disease”. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 72 (1): 225–7. PMID 15391722.
  4. SCOBIE BA, MCGILL DB, PRIESTLEY JT, ROVELSTAD RA (1964). “EXCLUDED GASTRIC ANTRUM SIMULATING THE ZOLLINGER-ELLISON SYNDROME”. Gastroenterology. 47: 184–7. PMID 14201408.
  5. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott ID, Bernstein CN, Brant SR; et al. (2005). “Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology”. Can J Gastroenterol. 19 Suppl A: 5A–36A. PMID 16151544.
  6. Sauter GH, Moussavian AC, Meyer G, Steitz HO, Parhofer KG, Jüngst D (2002). “Bowel habits and bile acid malabsorption in the months after cholecystectomy”. Am J Gastroenterol. 97 (7): 1732–5. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05779.x. PMID 12135027.
  7. Maiuri L, Raia V, Potter J, Swallow D, Ho MW, Fiocca R; et al. (1991). “Mosaic pattern of lactase expression by villous enterocytes in human adult-type hypolactasia”. Gastroenterology. 100 (2): 359–69. PMID 1702075.
  8. RUBIN CE, BRANDBORG LL, PHELPS PC, TAYLOR HC (1960). “Studies of celiac disease. I. The apparent identical and specific nature of the duodenal and proximal jejunal lesion in celiac disease and idiopathic sprue”. Gastroenterology. 38: 28–49. PMID 14439871.
  9. Street, Sara; Donoghue, Helen D; Neild, GH (1999). “Tropheryma whippelii DNA in saliva of healthy people”. The Lancet. 354 (9185): 1178–1179. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03065-2. ISSN 0140-6736.
  10. Marth T, Strober W (1996). “Whipple’s disease”. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 7 (1): 41–8. PMID 8903578.
  11. Schneider, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Loddenkemper, Christoph; Marth, Thomas; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 8 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. ISSN 1473-3099.
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Whipple’s disease is a systemic disease among middle-aged white males in North America and western Europe. It affects males 8 times more than females. Few studies were done to evaluate the demographics of Whipple’s disease due to the sparsity of the disease. The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals and the prevalence is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy. Although the prevalence of carrier state is higher in Asian and African countries, the prevalence of the classic Whipple’s disease is less than American and western European countries. The case-fatality rate of Whipple’s disease is approximately 100%, if left untreated. The case-fatality rate of treated Whipple’s disease is unknown.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

  • The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy.[1]
  • The incidence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 12 annually worldwide.[2]
  • Between 1907 and 1987, the incidence of Whipple’s disease was estimated to be 696 cases worldwide.[2]

Prevalence

Classic Whipple’s disease

  • The prevalence of Whipple’s disease is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals in north-western Italy.[1]

Carrier state

Case-fatality rate

Age

  • Whipple’s disease commonly affects individuals between 40 to 60 years of age; the median age at diagnosis is 50 years.[10]

Race

  • Whipple’s disease usually affects individuals of the caucasian race. Africans and Asians are less likely to develop Whipple’s disease.[11]

Gender

  • Males are more commonly affected by Whipple’s disease than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 8 to 1.[10]

Region

  • The majority of Whipple’s disease cases are reported in North America and western Europe.[12]

Developed Countries

Developing Countries

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Biagi, F.; Balduzzi, D.; Delvino, P.; Schiepatti, A.; Klersy, C.; Corazza, G. R. (2015). “Prevalence of Whipple’s disease in north-western Italy”. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 34 (7): 1347–1348. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2357-2. ISSN 0934-9723.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Dobbins W, III. 1987. Whipple’s disease. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, IL.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Fenollar, Florence; Laouira, Sonia; Lepidi, Hubert; Rolain, Jean‐Marc; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Value ofTropheryma whippleiQuantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Diagnosis of Whipple Disease: Usefulness of Saliva and Stool Specimens for First‐Line Screening”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 47 (5): 659–667. doi:10.1086/590559. ISSN 1058-4838.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Fenollar, Florence; Trani, Michèle; Davoust, Bernard; Salle, Bettina; Birg, Marie‐Laure; Rolain, Jean‐Marc; Raoult, Didier (2008). “Prevalence of AsymptomaticTropheryma whippleiCarriage among Humans and Nonhuman Primates”. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 197 (6): 880–887. doi:10.1086/528693. ISSN 0022-1899.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whippleias a commensal bacterium”. Future Microbiology. 8 (1): 57–71. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.124. ISSN 1746-0913.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Small, Pamela L.; Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Dubot-Pérès, Audrey; Phommasone, Koukeo; Sibounheuang, Bountoy; Vongsouvath, Manivanh; Mayxay, Mayfong; Raoult, Didier; Newton, Paul N.; Fenollar, Florence (2015). “High Prevalence of Tropheryma whipplei in Lao Kindergarten Children”. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 9 (2): e0003538. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003538. ISSN 1935-2735.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Vinnemeier CD, Klupp EM, Krumkamp R, Rolling T, Fischer N, OwusuDabo E, Addo MM, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Kasmaier J, Aepfelbacher M, Cramer JP, May J, Tannich E. 2016. Tropheryma whipplei in children with diarrhoea in rural Ghana. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:65.e1– 65.e3
  8. Durand DV, Lecomte C, Cathébras P, Rousset H, Godeau P (1997). “Whipple disease. Clinical review of 52 cases. The SNFMI Research Group on Whipple Disease. Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne”. Medicine (Baltimore). 76 (3): 170–84. PMID 9193452.
  9. Marth, Thomas; Raoult, Didier (2003). “Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet. 361 (9353): 239–246. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12274-X. ISSN 0140-6736.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Marth, Thomas (2015). “Tropheryma whipplei, Immunosuppression and Whipple’s Disease: From a Low-Pathogenic, Environmental Infectious Organism to a Rare, Multifaceted Inflammatory Complex”. Digestive Diseases. 33 (2): 190–199. doi:10.1159/000369538. ISSN 0257-2753.
  11. Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
  12. Fenollar, Florence; Puéchal, Xavier; Raoult, Didier (2007). “Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 356 (1): 55–66. doi:10.1056/NEJMra062477. ISSN 0028-4793.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of Whipple’s disease may be environmental, genetic, and immunologic. The most important risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets. Defective cellular immunity is the less common risk factor.

Risk Factors

  • The most potent risk factor in the development of Whipple’s disease is poor sanitation including living in homeless shelters and absence of toilets.

Common risk factors

Less common risk factors

References

  1. Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2008). “Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment”. Lancet Infect Dis. 8 (3): 179–90. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2. PMID 18291339.
  2. Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
  3. Schoniger-Hekele, M.; Petermann, D.; Weber, B.; Muller, C. (2007). “Tropheryma whipplei in the Environment: Survey of Sewage Plant Influxes and Sewage Plant Workers”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73 (6): 2033–2035. doi:10.1128/AEM.02335-06. ISSN 0099-2240.
  4. Bureš, Jan; Kopáčová, Marcela; Douda, Tomáš; Bártová, Jolana; Tomš, Jan; Rejchrt, Stanislav; Tachecí, Ilja (2013). “Whipple’s Disease: Our Own Experience and Review of the Literature”. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2013: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/478349. ISSN 1687-6121.
  5. Dutly, F.; Altwegg, M. (2001). “Whipple’s Disease and “Tropheryma whippelii“. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 14 (3): 561–583. doi:10.1128/CMR.14.3.561-583.2001. ISSN 0893-8512.
  6. Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.
  7. Conly JM, Johnston BL (2001). “Rare but not so rare: The evolving spectrum of Whipple’s disease”. Can J Infect Dis. 12 (3): 133–5. PMC 2094813. PMID 18159328.
  8. Fenollar, Florence; Lagier, Jean-Christophe; Raoult, Didier (2014). “Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple’s disease”. Journal of Infection. 69 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008. ISSN 0163-4453.
  9. Keita, Alpha Kabinet; Brouqui, Philippe; Badiaga, Sékéné; Benkouiten, Samir; Ratmanov, Pavel; Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence (2013). “Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 17 (1): e67–e68. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1033. ISSN 1201-9712.
  10. Schwartzman, Sergio; Schwartzman, Monica (2013). “Whipple’s Disease”. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 39 (2): 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2013.03.005. ISSN 0889-857X.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Whipple’s disease.[1]

References

  1. Dolmans, Ruben A. V.; Boel, C. H. Edwin; Lacle, Miangela M.; Kusters, Johannes G. (2017). “Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei Infections”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 30 (2): 529–555. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. ISSN 0893-8512.

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Acute infection might present with gastroenteritis, pneumonia or bacteremia. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. Classic Whipple’s disease has 3 clinical phases that starts with nonspecific symptoms and joint pain. It progresses to gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, steatorrhea, malabsorption, and weight loss. in the late phase, all the other organs including CNS, joints, eyes, heart, lung, liver and skin might be involved. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality. Common complications of Whipple’s disease include malnutrition, cardiopulmonary, neurologic and osteoarticular involvement. Malabsorption mostly presents with fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, fatigue, and weight loss. Valvular heart disease and dementia are the most common cardiac and neurologic complication, respectively. The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment started early. Without treatment, Whipple’s disease is fatal.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Tropheryma whipplei infection has different clinical manifestations. It could cause acute infection, localized infection and the classic Whipple’s disease. Each of them has its own progression and natural history. Acute infection might resolve without treatment but usually progress to systemic infection or carrier state. The risk of relapse is approximately 40%, if treatment is not completed. Relapse of Whipple’s disease might occur up to 30 years after treatment and it is commonly responsible for morbidity and mortality.[1]

Acute infection

Classic Whipple’s disease

Patients who developed the classic Whipple’s disease usually have 3 clinical phases:

Localized infection

Patients might present with localized infection instead of systemic involvement after being infected by Tropheryma whipplei.

Complications

Common complications of Whipple’s disease include:[13][14][15][1][16]

Prognosis

  • The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is good if diagnosed properly and long-term treatment started early.[14]
  • The prognosis of Whipple’s disease is generally very poor if left untreated.[13]
  • The presence of neurologic symptoms is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with Whipple’s disease.[15]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Marth, Thomas; Moos, Verena; Müller, Christian; Biagi, Federico; Schneider, Thomas (2016). “Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (3): e13–e22. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00537-X. ISSN 1473-3099.
  2. Raoult, Didier; Fenollar, Florence; Rolain, Jean-Marc; Minodier, Philippe; Bosdure, Emmanuelle; Li, Wenjun; Garnier, Jean-Marc; Richet, Hervé (2010). “Tropheryma whipplei in Children with Gastroenteritis”. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 16 (5): 776–782. doi:10.3201/eid1605.091801. ISSN 1080-6040.
  3. Lozupone, Catherine; Cota-Gomez, Adela; Palmer, Brent E.; Linderman, Derek J.; Charlson, Emily S.; Sodergren, Erica; Mitreva, Makedonka; Abubucker, Sahar; Martin, John; Yao, Guohui; Campbell, Thomas B.; Flores, Sonia C.; Ackerman, Gail; Stombaugh, Jesse; Ursell, Luke; Beck, James M.; Curtis, Jeffrey L.; Young, Vincent B.; Lynch, Susan V.; Huang, Laurence; Weinstock, George M.; Knox, Kenneth S.; Twigg, Homer; Morris, Alison; Ghedin, Elodie; Bushman, Frederic D.; Collman, Ronald G.; Knight, Rob; Fontenot, Andrew P. (2013). “Widespread Colonization of the Lung byTropheryma whippleiin HIV Infection”. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 187 (10): 1110–1117. doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2145OC. ISSN 1073-449X.
  4. Fenollar, Florence; Mediannikov, Oleg; Socolovschi, Cristina; Bassene, Hubert; Diatta, Georges; Richet, Hervé; Tall, Adama; Sokhna, Cheikh; Trape, Jean‐François; Raoult, Didier (2010). “Tropheryma whippleiBacteremia during Fever in Rural West Africa”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 51 (5): 515–521. doi:10.1086/655677. ISSN 1058-4838.
  5. Bai, J; Mazure, R; Vazquez, H; Niveloni, S; Smecuol, E; Pedreira, S; Maurino, E (2004). “Whipple’s disease”. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2 (10): 849–860. doi:10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00387-8. ISSN 1542-3565.
  6. Puéchal, Xavier (2013). “Whipple’s disease”. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 72 (6): 797–803. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202684. ISSN 0003-4967.
  7. Fleming, Jon L.; Wiesner, Russell H.; Shorter, Roy G. (1988). “Whipple’s Disease: Clinical, Biochemical, and Histopathologic Features and Assessment of Treatment in 29 Patients”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 63 (6): 539–551. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(12)64884-8. ISSN 0025-6196.
  8. Geissdorfer, W.; Moos, V.; Moter, A.; Loddenkemper, C.; Jansen, A.; Tandler, R.; Morguet, A. J.; Fenollar, F.; Raoult, D.; Bogdan, C.; Schneider, T. (2011). “High Frequency of Tropheryma whipplei in Culture-Negative Endocarditis”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 50 (2): 216–222. doi:10.1128/JCM.05531-11. ISSN 0095-1137.
  9. Fenollar, Florence; Nicoli, François; Paquet, Claire; Lepidi, Hubert; Cozzone, Patrick; Antoine, Jean-Christophe; Pouget, Jean; Raoult, Didier (2011). “Progressive dementia associated with ataxia or obesity in patients with Tropheryma whipplei encephalitis”. BMC Infectious Diseases. 11 (1). doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-171. ISSN 1471-2334.
  10. Urbanski, Geoffrey; Rivereau, Philippe; Artru, Laure; Fenollar, Florence; Raoult, Didier; Puéchal, Xavier (2012). “Whipple Disease Revealed by Lung Involvement”. Chest. 141 (6): 1595–1598. doi:10.1378/chest.11-1812. ISSN 0012-3692.
  11. Bruhlmann, P. (2000). “Diagnosis and therapy monitoring of Whipple’s arthritis by polymerase chain reaction”. Rheumatology. 39 (12): 1427–1428. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1427. ISSN 1460-2172.
  12. Bauerfeind, Peter; Koelz, Hans-Rudolf; Altwegg, Martin (1999). “PCR for Tropheryma whippelii”. The Lancet. 354 (9188): 1476–1477. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77620-0. ISSN 0140-6736.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Fenollar, Florence; Lagier, Jean-Christophe; Raoult, Didier (2014). “Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple’s disease”. Journal of Infection. 69 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008. ISSN 0163-4453.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Bureš, Jan; Kopáčová, Marcela; Douda, Tomáš; Bártová, Jolana; Tomš, Jan; Rejchrt, Stanislav; Tachecí, Ilja (2013). “Whipple’s Disease: Our Own Experience and Review of the Literature”. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2013: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/478349. ISSN 1687-6121.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Dutly, F.; Altwegg, M. (2001). “Whipple’s Disease and “Tropheryma whippelii“. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 14 (3): 561–583. doi:10.1128/CMR.14.3.561-583.2001. ISSN 0893-8512.
  16. Fenollar, Florence; Puéchal, Xavier; Raoult, Didier (2007). “Whipple’s Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine. 356 (1): 55–66. doi:10.1056/NEJMra062477. ISSN 0028-4793.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

External Links

​​ ​

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH